Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
Commission File Number: 53915
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57744/57744dbe03f3d69979f457fd55c2098adddceb65" alt=""
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 84-1080045 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
12222 Merit Drive, Suite 1850 Dallas, Texas | | 75251 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
972-770-4700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer o |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of April 30, 2013, the registrant had 26,709,758 shares of common stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained in all parts of this document relate to future events, including, but not limited to, any and all statements regarding future operations, financial results, business plans and cash needs and other statements that are not historical facts are forward looking statements. When used in this document, the words “anticipate,” “budgeted,” “planned,” “targeted,” “potential,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “project,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to be among the statements that identify forward looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those relating to the current economic downturn and credit crisis, the volatility of natural gas and oil prices, our dependence on our key personnel, factors that affect our ability to manage our growth and achieve our business strategy, technological changes, our significant capital requirements, the potential impact of government regulations and the taxation of the oil and gas industry, adverse regulatory determinations, litigation, competition, , availability of drilling, completion and production equipment and materials, business and equipment acquisition risks, weather, availability of financing and the terms of any such financing, financial condition of our industry partners, ability to obtain permits, drilling and completion of wells, infrastructure for salt water disposal, costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting other operations, competition in the oil and natural gas industry, developments in oil producing and natural gas producing countries, and other factors detailed herein. Some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements are described under “Risk Factors” and in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.
3
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) | | December 31, 2012 | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,165,677 | | $ | 1,484,386 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | 561,027 | | 2,539,976 | |
Marketable securities | | 514,713 | | 514,244 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | 89,913 | | 114,589 | |
Deferred tax asset, net | | 5,576 | | 3,452 | |
Total current assets | | 3,336,906 | | 4,656,647 | |
| | | | | |
Restricted cash | | 4,313,753 | | 4,313,599 | |
Property and equipment, net | | 1,507,652 | | 681,555 | |
Deferred financing costs | | 12,500 | | 12,500 | |
Deposits and other | | 59,296 | | 9,296 | |
| | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 9,230,107 | | $ | 9,673,597 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 517,134 | | $ | 743,495 | |
Deposits held in trust | | 587,083 | | 369 | |
Revenues payable | | 120,313 | | 230,947 | |
Debt - current portion | | 276,490 | | 299,767 | |
Total current liabilities | | 1,501,020 | | 1,274,578 | |
| | | | | |
Other liabilities: | | | | | |
Debt | | 370,959 | | 416,016 | |
Derivative liabilities | | 2,510 | | 2,510 | |
Asset retirement obligation | | 7,912 | | — | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | 5,576 | | 3,452 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities | | 1,887,977 | | 1,696,556 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Mezzanine equity: | | | | | |
Preferred stock, Series A convertible, $0.001 par value; and redemption value of 5,763,869 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | | 5,763,869 | | 5,763,869 | |
| | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 27,695,048 shares issued and 26,695,457 outstanding at March 31, 2013 and 27,652,749 shares issued and 26,653,158 outstanding at December 31, 2012 | | 27,695 | | 27,653 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 20,584,047 | | 20,546,744 | |
Treasury stock, at cost: 999,591 shares at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | | (1,859,890 | ) | (1,859,890 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | (17,176,089 | ) | (16,506,529 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 2,498 | | 5,194 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 1,578,261 | | 2,213,172 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 9,230,107 | | $ | 9,673,597 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
| | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | |
Land services | | $ | 330,382 | | $ | 950,110 | |
Oil and gas sales | | 119,191 | | 12,430 | |
Total revenues | | 449,573 | | 962,540 | |
| | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | |
Oil & gas lease operating expenses | | 107,018 | | 6,566 | |
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | | 5,062 | | 18,336 | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 994,801 | | 439,068 | |
Total operating expenses | | 1,106,881 | | 463,970 | |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | (657,308 | ) | 498,570 | |
| | | | | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | |
Interest and dividend income | | 7,332 | | — | |
Gain on sale of securities | | 585 | | — | |
Interest expense | | (18,359 | ) | (178,881 | ) |
Total other income (expense) | | (10,442 | ) | (178,881 | ) |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | (667,750 | ) | 319,689 | |
Income tax provision | | (1,810 | ) | (9,547 | ) |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | (669,560 | ) | 310,142 | |
Discontinued Operations | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations, before taxes | | — | | (7,127,893 | ) |
Income tax benefit | | — | | 249,740 | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | — | | (6,878,153 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss | | (669,560 | ) | (6,568,011 | ) |
Non-controlling interest | | — | | 5,017 | |
Net loss attributable to NYTEX Energy Holdings, Inc. | | (669,560 | ) | (6,562,994 | ) |
Preferred stock dividends | | — | | (129,272 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss to common stockholders | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,692,266 | ) |
| | | | | |
Basic and diluted earnings per share: | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | |
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | — | | (0.25 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) |
| | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted | | | | | |
Basic | | 26,657,389 | | 27,472,558 | |
Diluted | | 26,657,389 | | 27,889,764 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
| | | | | |
Net loss to common stockholders | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,692,266 | ) |
| | | | | |
Other comprehensive income | | | | | |
Unrealized holding loss on securities available for sale | | (2,696 | ) | — | |
| | | | | |
Other comprehensive income | | (2,696 | ) | — | |
| | | | | |
Comprehensive loss to common stockholders | | $ | (672,256 | ) | $ | (6,692,266 | ) |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
| | Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In | | Treasury Stock | | Accumulated | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | | Non-Controlling | | | |
| | Shares | | Amounts | | Shares | | Amounts | | Capital | | Shares | | Amounts | | Deficit | | Income | | Interest | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | 5,761,028 | | $ | 5,761 | | 27,467,723 | | $ | 27,468 | | $ | 25,974,600 | | — | | $ | — | | $ | (10,775,161 | ) | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 15,232,668 | |
Shares issued for debt | | | | | | 20,000 | | 20 | | 32,980 | | | | | | | | | | | | 33,000 | |
Share based compensation | | | | | | | | | | 50,133 | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,133 | |
Dividends declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (129,272 | ) | | | | | (129,272 | ) |
Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (6,562,994 | ) | | | (5,017 | ) | (6,568,011 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2012 | | 5,761,028 | | $ | 5,761 | | 27,487,723 | | $ | 27,488 | | $ | 26,057,713 | | — | | $ | — | | $ | (17,467,427 | ) | $ | — | | $ | (5,017 | ) | $ | 8,618,518 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | — | | $ | — | | 27,652,749 | | 27,653 | | $ | 20,546,744 | | 999,591 | | $ | (1,859,890 | ) | $ | (16,506,529 | ) | $ | 5,194 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,213,172 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares issued for share based compensation and services | | | | | | 42,299 | | 42 | | 37,303 | | | | | | | | | | | | 37,345 | |
Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (2,696 | ) | | | (2,696 | ) |
Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (669,560 | ) | | | | | (669,560 | ) |
Comprehensive loss to common stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (672,256 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2013 | | — | | $ | — | | 27,695,048 | | $ | 27,695 | | $ | 20,584,047 | | 999,591 | | $ | (1,859,890 | ) | $ | (17,176,089 | ) | $ | 2,498 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,578,261 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net Loss | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,568,011 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | | 4,960 | | 2,291,432 | |
Bad debt expense | | — | | (80,943 | ) |
Share-based compensation | | 37,345 | | 50,133 | |
Deferred income taxes | | — | | (307,496 | ) |
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations | | 102 | | — | |
Amortization of debt discount | | 16,449 | | 15,028 | |
Amortization of deferred financing fees | | — | | 99,122 | |
Accretion of Senior Series A redeemable preferred stock liability | | — | | 943,182 | |
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | | — | | 4,267,000 | |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net | | — | | 63,732 | |
Gain on sale of securities, net | | (585 | ) | — | |
Change in working capital: | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 1,978,949 | | 2,288,168 | |
Inventories | | — | | (186,336 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other | | (25,324 | ) | 871,293 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | (226,361 | ) | (731,569 | ) |
Deposits held in trust | | 586,714 | | — | |
Other liabilities | | (110,634 | ) | 1,286 | |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 1,592,055 | | 3,016,021 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Additions to property and equipment | | (37,514 | ) | (300,687 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | 93,736 | | 26,613 | |
Investments in oil and gas properties | | (879,469 | ) | — | |
Restricted cash | | (154 | ) | — | |
Purchase of marketable securities | | (2,580 | ) | — | |
| | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (825,981 | ) | (274,074 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Borrowings under senior facility | | — | | 21,600,264 | |
Payments under senior facility | | — | | (23,178,807 | ) |
Payments on notes payable | | (84,783 | ) | (1,134,296 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (84,783 | ) | (2,712,839 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 681,291 | | 29,108 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 1,484,386 | | 10,817 | |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 2,165,677 | | $ | 39,925 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
NYTEX Energy Holdings, Inc. (“NYTEX Energy”) is an energy holding company with principal operations centralized in its wholly-owned subsidiary, NYTEX Petroleum, Inc. (“NYTEX Petroleum”). NYTEX Petroleum is an early-stage exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition, development, and production of oil and natural gas reserves from low-risk, high rate-of-return wells in shallow carbonate reservoirs.
Prior to May 4, 2012, NYTEX Energy, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, NYTEX FDF Acquisition, Inc. (“Acquisition Inc.”), owned a 100% membership interest in New Francis Oaks, LLC (“New Francis Oaks”) and its wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Francis Drilling Fluids, Ltd. (“Francis Drilling Fluids,” or “FDF” and, together with New Francis Oaks, the “Francis Group”), a full-service provider of drilling, completion, and specialized fluids, dry drilling and completion products, technical services, industrial cleaning services, and equipment rental for the oil and gas industry. On May 4, 2012, certain subsidiaries of ours entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with an unaffiliated third party, FDF Resources Holdings LLC (the “Purchaser”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, New Francis Oaks was merged into the Purchaser and, as a result, FDF is now owned by an unaffiliated third party.
In March 2012, NYTEX Energy created Petro Staffing Group, LLC, doing business as KS Energy Search Group (“KS Search”), as a full-service executive recruiting and placement agency providing the energy marketplace with full-time professionals. Prior to November 5, 2012, NYTEX Energy owned 80% of KS Search resulting in a non-controlling interest. On November 5, 2012, NYTEX Energy acquired the remaining 20% interest in KS Search. On April 30, 2013, the Company elected to cease the operations of its staffing services business, Petro Staffing Group, LLC, doing business as KS Energy Search Group.
NYTEX Energy and subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our.”
NYTEX Energy and its subsidiaries are headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
NOTE 2. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. These financial statements include the accounts of NYTEX Energy and entities in which it holds a controlling interest. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in non-controlled entities over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. In applying the equity method of accounting, the investments are initially recognized at cost, and subsequently adjusted for our proportionate share of earnings and losses and distributions.
The interim financial data as of March 31, 2013 and for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are unaudited; in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto as filed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation. Land services revenues consists of fees generated from analyzing land and mineral title reports, leasehold title analysis and reports, land title runsheets, sourcing, negotiating and acquiring leases, document preparation and performing title curative functions. Such revenues had previously been reported as Other revenues on the consolidated statements of operations.
Discontinued Operation
The consolidated financial statements present the operations of our former oilfield services segment (FDF) as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 205-20-55 for all periods presented.
9
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3. DISPOSITION OF FDF
On May 4, 2012, (the “Closing Date”), Acquisition Inc., together with New Francis Oaks, entered into the Merger Agreement with the Purchaser. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, New Francis Oaks merged with and into the Purchaser, and the Purchaser continued as the surviving entity after the merger (the “Disposition” or the “Merger”). New Francis Oaks owns 100% of the outstanding shares of FDF, and, as a result of the Disposition, we no longer own FDF.
The total consideration for the Merger paid by the Purchaser on the Closing Date was $62,500,000 (the “Merger Proceeds”). After: (i) an adjustment to the amount of the Merger Proceeds based upon the level of estimated working capital of the Francis Group on the Closing Date; (ii) the payment or provision for payment of all indebtedness of the Francis Group on the Closing Date; (iii) the payment of all indebtedness of Acquisition Inc. on the Closing Date (including under its senior secured credit facility with PNC Bank; (iv) the payment of the Put Payment Amount (as defined below) due to WayPoint Nytex, LLC (“WayPoint”) under the WayPoint Purchase Agreement (as defined below); (v) the payment of all transaction expenses relating to the Merger; (vi) the payment to the Company of $812,500 of accrued management fees and $110,279 of expense reimbursement due and payable to the Company under the Management Services Agreement, dated November 23, 2010, between the Company and FDF (the “Management Agreement”); (vii) the payment of certain transaction bonuses payable to certain FDF employees; and (viii) the Purchaser’s delivery of $6,250,000 of the Merger Proceeds (the “Escrow Fund”) to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as escrow agent, to be held in escrow under the Escrow Agreement (as defined below) and reported as restricted cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012, Acquisition Inc. received on the Closing Date remaining cash transaction proceeds in the amount of approximately $4,481,000. The Merger Agreement provides that, to the extent that the final amount of working capital of the Francis Group on the Closing Date is greater than the estimated amount of working capital, as determined under the Merger Agreement, the Purchaser will pay to Acquisition Inc. the amount of such working capital surplus, provided that, pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement (as defined below), WayPoint is entitled to receive 87.5% of any such working capital surplus payment. To the extent that the final amount of working capital of the Francis Group on the Closing Date is less than the estimated amount of working capital, Acquisition Inc. will pay to the Purchaser the amount of such working capital deficit, which payment will be made out of the Escrow Fund, provided that, pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement, WayPoint is obligated to pay to Acquisition Inc. 87.5% of the amount of any such working capital deficit.
In connection with the consummation of the Merger, we entered into an Omnibus Agreement (the “Omnibus Agreement”) with WayPoint and the Francis Group. The Omnibus Agreement became effective upon the consummation of the Merger.
Pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement, upon the consummation of the Merger:
(i) the Management Agreement was terminated;
(ii) Waypoint paid $150,000 to the Company out of the Put Payment Amount due and payable to WayPoint;
(iii) the Company was paid $812,500 from the Merger Proceeds, which sum represented accrued management fees due and payable to the Company from FDF under the Management Agreement; and
(iv) the Company was paid $110,279 from the Merger Proceeds, which sum represented reimbursement by FDF of certain expenses previously incurred by the Company in respect of certain professional services provided, and which reimbursement was due and payable to the Company from FDF under the Management Agreement.
In the Omnibus Agreement, the Company, WayPoint, and the Francis Group also agreed to mutual releases from and to each other, and their related parties, relating to facts existing on or before the Closing Date that relate to the Merger, the WayPoint Purchase Agreement, the related documents, and the relations among the parties. The releases also covered claims that any of the parties could assert against any employees of the FDF Group. In addition, the parties agreed that WayPoint would bear 87.5% of any post-closing working capital deficit under the Merger Agreement and WayPoint would receive 87.5% of any post-closing working capital surplus under the Merger Agreement.
Further, in connection with the consummation of the Merger, we entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with WayPoint, the Francis Group, and Michael G. Francis and Bryan Francis (together, the “Francises”). The Settlement Agreement became effective upon the consummation of the Merger.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, upon the consummation of the Merger:
(i) WayPoint paid out of the Put Payment Amount a $100,000 bonus to Michael G. Francis, the President of NYTEX Acquisition, and a $25,000 bonus to Jude N. Gregory, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Acquisition Inc.;
10
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(ii) (A) the Company caused the release of the $1,800,000 of Escrowed Cash (as defined in the Escrow Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2010, by and among Acquisition Inc., Bryan Francis and The F&M Bank & Trust Company (the “Francis Escrow Agreement”)) then being held in escrow pursuant to the Francis Escrow Agreement, in accordance with the terms of the Francis Escrow Agreement, and (B) Michael G. Francis transferred and assigned back to the Company 625,000 shares of common stock of the Company then owned by Michael G. Francis and originally issued to him pursuant to the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2010 (the “Francis Purchase Agreement”), and then being held in escrow pursuant to the Francis Escrow Agreement;
(iii) (A) Michael G. Francis transferred and assigned back to the Company all of the remaining 2,197,063 shares of common stock then owned by him and originally issued to him pursuant to the Francis Purchase Agreement, and (B) Bryan Francis transferred and assigned back to the Company all of the 381,607 shares of common stock originally issued to him pursuant to the Francis Purchase Agreement, as well as all of the 27,225 shares of NYTEX Common Stock issued to him in connection with his employment by FDF;
(iv) the employment agreements of Michael G. Francis and Bryan Francis terminated and they became at-will employees of the FDF Group;
(v) each of the three designees of WayPoint then serving as directors of Acquisition Inc., which included John Henry Moulton, Thomas Drechsler and Lee Buchwald, resigned as directors of Acquisition Inc., effective immediately upon the consummation of the Merger; and
(vi) in exchange for receipt by WayPoint of the Put Payment Amount (which consisted of $30,000,000, less an aggregate of $306,639 of dividends previously received by WayPoint on account of the WayPoint Senior Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock, less an aggregate of $275,000 payable by WayPoint to the Company, Michael G. Francis and Jude N. Gregory pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, less an additional $449,072 (representing 87.5% of the estimated working capital deficit of the Francis Companies on the Closing Date, but subject to the right of WayPoint to subsequently receive 87.5% of any final working capital surplus of the Francis Companies on the Closing Date and the obligation of WayPoint to subsequently pay 87.5% of any final working capital deficit of the Francis Companies on the Closing Date, pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement); the “Put Payment Amount”), WayPoint transferred and assigned (A) the Senior Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock back to Acquisition Inc., (B) the Purchaser Warrant and the Control Warrant back to the Company, and (C) the WayPoint Series B Share back to the Company, and all such securities were cancelled.
In the Settlement Agreement, the Company, WayPoint, the Francis Group, and the Francises also agreed to mutual releases from and to each other, and their related parties, relating to facts existing on or before the Closing Date that relate to the Merger, the WayPoint Purchase Agreement, the related documents, and the relations among the parties, including in connection with any employment agreements or arrangements of the Francises. The releases also covered claims that any of the parties could assert against any employees of the FDF Group.
In August 2012, the Purchaser delivered a proposed final closing statement, which included, among other things, a calculation of the final closing date net working capital, to the Company. Under the terms of the Omnibus Agreement, WayPoint agreed to bear 87.5% of any post-closing working capital deficit and conversely, we granted to WayPoint the authority to make all decisions, including the right to dispute any item contained in the final closing date net working capital, on our behalf with regards to the proposed final closing statement and final closing date net working capital.
In November 2012, WayPoint delivered to the Purchaser a notice of disagreement disputing certain items in the proposed closing statement and calculation of the final closing date net working capital. In January 2013, NYTEX, WayPoint, and the Purchaser agreed in principal to the final closing statement amounts, along with the calculation of the final closing date net working capital. Part of this agreement in principal included the planned release of funds from the Escrow Fund to the Purchaser in the amount of $1,936,762 (“Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow”).
A dispute between NYTEX and WayPoint arose with regards to the amounts due under the Omnibus Agreement to NYTEX with respect to WayPoint’s obligation to bear 87.5% of the Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow. Following substantial negotiations, on March 8, 2013, NYTEX and WayPoint agreed to settle this dispute such that WayPoint would pay to NYTEX $1,075,000 to satisfy its obligation under the Omnibus Agreement. On March 14, 2013, NYTEX was paid $1,075,000 and on March 15, 2013, the Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow was released to the Purchaser. As the events that gave rise to both NYTEX’s settlement with WayPoint and the release from escrow of the Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow existed as of December 31, 2012, the amount paid by WayPoint of $1,075,000 has been recognized as a receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012. In addition, the amount of funds to be released from the
11
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Escrow Fund of $1,936,762 has been recognized as a reserve against the restricted cash balance on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012.
NOTE 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment which includes our oil and gas properties at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consist of the following:
| | March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | |
Oil and gas properties - proved | | $ | 611,926 | | $ | 229,844 | |
Oil and gas properties - proved | | 939,542 | | 528,076 | |
Total oil and gas properties | | 1,551,468 | | 757,920 | |
Furniture, fixtuers, and equipment | | 139,266 | | 101,770 | |
Total property, plant, & equipment | | 1,690,734 | | 859,690 | |
Accumulated DD&A | | (183,082 | ) | (178,135 | ) |
| | | | | |
Property & equipment, net | | $ | 1,507,652 | | $ | 681,555 | |
Depreciation and depletion from continuing operations related to our property and equipment was $5,062 and $6,277 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
NOTE 5. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
At March 31, 2013, we had one derivative on our consolidated balance sheet which was related to the warrants issued to the holders of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The agreement setting forth the terms of the warrants issued to the holders of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock includes an anti-dilution provision that requires a reduction in the instrument’s exercise price should subsequent at-market issuances of the Company’s common stock be issued below the instrument’s original exercise price of $2.00 per share. Accordingly, we consider the warrants to be a derivative; and, as a result, the fair value of the derivative is included as a derivative liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of the warrants issued to the holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was $2,510.
Changes in fair value of the derivative liabilities are included as a separate line item within other income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and are not taxable or deductible for income tax purposes.
12
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 6. DEBT
A summary of our outstanding debt obligations as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is presented as follows:
| | March 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | |
5.5% Insurance Financing due August 2013 | | $ | 31,705 | | $ | 55,484 | |
Revolving Line of Credit due July 2014 | | 108,355 | | 108,355 | |
Francis Promissory Note (non-interest bearing) due October 2015 | | 269,716 | | 292,938 | |
Promissory Note (non-interest bearing) due December 2015 | | 221,333 | | 241,453 | |
7.5% Secured Equipment Loan due March 2016 | | 16,340 | | 17,553 | |
| | | | | |
Total debt | | 647,449 | | 715,783 | |
Less: current maturities | | (276,490 | ) | (299,767 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 370,959 | | $ | 416,016 | |
Carrying values in the table above include net unamortized debt discount of $166,660 and $183,109 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which is amortized to interest expense over the terms of the related debt.
Revolving Line of Credit
On July 11, 2012, we entered into a revolving line of credit agreement with a commercial bank providing for loans up to $325,000. The revolving credit line bears an annual interest rate based on the 30 day LIBOR plus 1.95% and matures on July 11, 2014. Payments of interest only are payable monthly with any outstanding principal and interest due in full, at maturity. The revolving line of credit is secured by our marketable securities. We pay no fee for the unused portion of the revolving line of credit nor are there any prepayment penalties. At March 31, 2013, amounts available under the revolving line of credit were $216,645.
Francis Promissory Note
In connection with the FDF acquisition, on November 23, 2010, we entered into a promissory note payable to a former interest holder of FDF (“Francis Promissory Note”) in the face amount of $750,000. The Francis Promissory Note is an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan that requires quarterly payments of $37,500 and matures October 1, 2015. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we have recorded the Francis Promissory Note as a discounted debt of $269,716 and $292,938 respectively, using an imputed interest rate of 9%.
Other Loans
In November 2012, we entered into a promissory note with a third party to finance premiums related to certain insurance policies. The promissory note bears an annual interest rate of 5.5% with principal and interest payments of $8,109 due monthly through maturity in August 2013.
In December 2012, we entered into an unsecured, non-interest bearing promissory note with a former vendor in the amount of $342,500 as a settlement for outstanding payables due to the former vendor. The promissory note required an initial payment of $75,000 with monthly payments of $7,430.55 due through maturity, on December 31, 2015. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we have recorded the promissory note as a discounted debt of $221,333 and $241,453, respectively, using an imputed interest rate of 7.5%.
We also have a secured equipment loan outstanding that requires a monthly principal and interest payment based on a fixed interest rate of 7.5% that matures March 2016.
13
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The Company leases office space under a non-cancelable operating lease which provides for minimum annual rentals. At March 31, 2013, future minimum obligations under this lease agreement are as follows:
April 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013 | | $ | 60,253 | |
2014 | | 81,583 | |
2015 | | 71,791 | |
2016 | | 58,283 | |
2017 | | — | |
Thereafter | | — | |
| | | |
| | $ | 271,910 | |
Total lease rental expense related to continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $20,907 and $22,875 respectively. Included in discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 is $901,498 of lease rental expense related to the FDF operations.
Litigation
We may become involved from time to time in litigation on various matters, which are routine to the conduct of our business. We believe that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or operations, although any adverse decision in these cases, or the costs of defending or settling such claims, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operations, and cash flows.
NOTE 8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The authorized capital of NYTEX Energy consists of 200 million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share; and, 10 million shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock have the same voting rights and powers as the holders of common stock. Each holder of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock may, at any time, convert their shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock at an initial conversion ratio of one-to-one. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we did not issue any shares of common stock related to conversions of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
Redemption of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
On March 28, 2013, we provided notice to the holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of our election to redeem on May 1, 2013 (the “Redemption Date”) an aggregate $1,000,000 in principal amount of outstanding shares of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $1.00 per share. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will be redeemed pro rata based on the number of shares held by each holder of record relative to the total number of Series A Convertible Preferred shares outstanding as of the Redemption Date.
Treasury Stock
On May 4, 2012, in connection with the disposition of FDF, we received as an assignment a total of 3,230,895 shares of the Company’s common stock. On June 5, 2012, Michael K. Galvis, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, surrendered one million shares of common stock pursuant to an agreement entered into with the Company on November 23, 2010. All such shares are being held as treasury stock at cost. In October 2012, 3,231,304 shares were re-issued from treasury to Series A Holders in connection with the restructuring of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
Warrants
The fair value of our warrants is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulation. The expected term of each warrant is estimated based on the contractual term or an expected time-to-liquidity event. The volatility assumption is estimated based on expectations of volatility over the term of the warrant as indicated by implied volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate for a term commensurate with the expected
14
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
term of the warrant. A summary of warrant activity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
| | Warrants | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Warrants | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at beginning of period | | 4,748,690 | | $ | 0.13 | | 46,335,949 | | $ | 0.13 | |
Issued | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Adjustment for WayPoint Warrant | | — | | — | | (9,068 | ) | 0.01 | |
Exercised | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Forfeited or expired | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Outstanding at end of period | | 4,748,690 | | $ | 0.13 | | 46,326,881 | | $ | 0.13 | |
On May 4, 2012, as a condition to the disposition of FDF, warrants held by WayPoint to acquire 41,583,569 shares of our common stock were forfeited and terminated.
NOTE 9. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
In November 2012, the Board of Directors adopted the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan for the purpose of attracting and retaining the services of key employees, consultants, and non-employee members of the Board of Directors and to provide such persons with a proprietary interest in the Company through the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, and/or other awards.
In March 2013, the Company granted to its executive officers, Board of Directors, and certain key employees nonqualified stock options and restricted stock under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. Nonqualified stock options to purchase an aggregate 227,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.42 per share were awarded; these options vest ratably over a service period of three years. A total of 136,200 shares of restricted stock were granted and such awards vest over a three year period. The total grant date fair value of all of these awards was approximately $101,000. At March 31, 2013, the unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to all awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years is approximately $95,000.
Stock Options
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we recognized approximately $400 in stock-based compensation related to stock options. We did not have any stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2013:
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2012 | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | |
Granted | | 227,000 | | $ | 0.42 | | $ | 0.19 | | | |
Exercised | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | |
Cancelled / Forfeited | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | |
Outstanding, March 31, 2013 | | 227,000 | | $ | 0.42 | | $ | 0.19 | | 10.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at March 31, 2013 | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | — | |
15
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The following table shows the weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes calculation of the fair value of the stock option grants for the three months ended March 31, 2013:
Expected dividend yield | | 0.0 | % |
Volatility | | 47.3 | % |
Risk free interest rate | | 1.3 | % |
Expected life | | 6.0 Years | |
Restricted stock
Restricted stock awards are awards of common stock that are subject the restrictions on transfer and to a risk of forfeiture if the awardee terminates employment with the Company prior to the lapse of the restrictions. The fair value of such stock was determined using the closing price on the grant date and compensation expense is recorded over the applicable vesting periods. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, we recognized approximately $37,000 and $4,700, respectively, in stock-based compensation related to restricted stock awards. The following table summarizes our restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2013:
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | |
Unvested, December 31, 2012 | | 116,666 | | $ | 0.48 | |
Granted | | 136,200 | | $ | 0.42 | |
Vested | | (62,067 | ) | $ | 0.42 | |
Forfeited | | — | | $ | — | |
Unvested, March 31, 2013 | | 190,799 | | $ | 0.46 | |
NOTE 10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, marketable securities, accounts payable, derivative liabilities, and long-term debt. Because of their short maturity, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value. The fair value of debt is the estimated amount we would have to pay to repurchase our debt, including any premium or discount attributable to the difference between the stated interest rate and market rate of interest at each balance sheet date. Debt fair values are based on quoted market prices for identical instruments, if available, or based on valuations of similar debt instruments. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we estimate the fair value of our debt to be $647,449 and $715,783, respectively.
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We utilize a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.
· Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. These are typically obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets.
· Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices included for identical or similar assets and liabilities that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. These are typically obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments.
· Level 3 — Unobservable inputs, where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own beliefs about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, based on the best information available in the circumstances.
As discussed in Note 5, we consider the warrants issued to the holders of the Company’s Series A Convertible
16
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Preferred Stock to be derivatives, and, as a result, the fair value of the derivative liabilities are reported on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We value the derivative liabilities using a Monte Carlo simulation which contains significant unobservable, or Level 3, inputs. The use of valuation techniques requires us to make various key assumptions for inputs into the model, including assumptions about the expected behavior of the instruments’ holders and expected future volatility of the price of our common stock. At certain common stock price points within the Monte Carlo simulation, we assume holders of the instruments will convert into shares of our common stock. In estimating the fair value, we estimated future volatility by considering the historic volatility of the stock of a selected peer group over a five year period.
We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale, which are reported at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related income tax effect, if any, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from income and are reported as accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses from securities classified as available-for-sale are included in income. We measure the fair value of our marketable securities based on quoted prices for identical securities in active markets, or Level 1 inputs. As of March 31, 2013, available-for-sale securities consisted of the following:
| | Cost | | Gross Unrealized | | Fair | |
Available For Sale | | Basis | | Gains | | Losses | | Value | |
Fixed-income mutual funds | | $ | 499,590 | | $ | 2,498 | | $ | — | | $ | 502,088 | |
Money-market funds | | 12,625 | | — | | — | | 12,625 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 512,215 | | $ | 2,498 | | $ | — | | $ | 514,713 | |
The realized earnings from our marketable securities portfolio include realized gains and losses, based upon specific identification, and dividend and interest income. Realized earnings were $3,647 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. We did not have any marketable securities during the three month periods ended March 31, 2012.
In accordance with ASC Topic 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities, we review our marketable securities to determine whether a decline in fair value of a security below the cost basis is other than temporary. Should the decline be considered other than temporary, we write down the cost basis of the security and include the loss in current earnings as opposed to an unrealized holding loss. We did not recognize any losses for other than temporary impairments in our marketable securities portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Financial assets and liabilities from continuing operations measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
March 31, 2013 | | Carrying Amount | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | |
Marketable securities | | $ | 514,713 | | $ | 514,713 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Derivative liabilities | | $ | 2,510 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,510 | |
March 31, 2012 | | Carrying Amount | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | |
Derivative liabilities | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The fair value of the derivative liabilities related to warrants issued to the holders of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was $0 at March 31, 2012. There were no changes in Level 3 fair value measurements of the derivative liabilities for both the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
NOTE 11. INCOME TAXES
Income tax provision from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013, was $1,810 and the income tax provision from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $9,547. The change in income tax provision in the first quarter of 2013, compared to the first quarter of 2012, was primarily the result of the differences in the mix of our pre-tax earnings and losses. At March 31, 2013, we had deferred income tax assets of $7,660,261 and a valuation allowance of $7,506,238 resulting in an estimated recoverable amount of deferred income tax assets of $154,023. This reflects a net increase of the valuation allowance of $234,715 from the December 31, 2012 balance
17
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
of $7,271,523. At March 31, 2013, we had deferred income tax liabilities of $154,023.
The balance of the valuation allowance as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $7,506,238 and $7,271,523, respectively. The anticipated effective income tax rate is expected to continue to differ from the Federal statutory rate primarily due to the effect of state income taxes, permanent differences between book and taxable income, changes to the valuation allowance, and certain discrete items.
18
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The following table reconciles net loss and common shares outstanding used in the calculations of basic and diluted net loss per share.
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Basic net income (loss) per share: | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | 310,142 | |
Net loss from discontinued operations | | — | | (6,878,153 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,568,011 | ) |
Noncontrolling interest | | — | | 5,017 | |
Attributable to preferred stockholders | | — | | (129,272 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,692,266 | ) |
| | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic | | 26,657,389 | | 27,472,558 | |
| | | | | |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | |
Discontinued operations | | — | | (0.25 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) |
Net loss attirbutable to noncontrolling interest | | — | | — | |
Attributable to preferred shareholders | | — | | — | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) |
| | | | | |
Diluted net income (loss) per share: | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | 310,142 | |
Net loss from discontinued operations | | — | | (6,878,153 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,568,011 | ) |
Noncontrolling interest | | — | | 5,017 | |
| | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,562,994 | ) |
| | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic | | 26,657,389 | | 27,472,558 | |
Plus: incremental shares from assumed conversions | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive warrants | | — | | 417,206 | |
| | | | | |
Shares used in calcuating diluted loss per share | | 26,657,389 | | 27,889,764 | |
| | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | |
Discontinued operations | | — | | (0.25 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) |
Net loss attirbutable to noncontrolling interest | | — | | — | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) |
| | | | | |
Earnings per share amounts may not foot due to rounding | | | | | |
19
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Basic earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share amounts assume the conversion, exercise, or issuance of all potential common stock instruments unless the effect is anti-dilutive, thereby reducing the loss or increasing the income per common share.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, certain common share equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as their effect on earnings per share was antidilutive. These excluded shares totaled 10,512,559 and 40,981,512 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
NOTE 13. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On May 4, 2012, Acquisition Inc., together with New Francis Oaks, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquisition Inc., entered into the Merger Agreement with an unaffiliated third party, FDF Resources Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“FDF Resources”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, New Francis Oaks merged with and into FDF Resources, and FDF Resources continued as the surviving entity after the Disposition. New Francis Oaks owns 100% of the outstanding shares of FDF, and, as a result of the disposition, we no longer own FDF.
We recognized a net after-tax loss of approximately $1,470,000 from the sale transaction during 2012, which represents the excess of the sale price over the book value of the assets sold.
We determined that the disposition of FDF met the definition of a discontinued operation. As a result, this business has been presented as a discontinued operation for all periods. Financial information for the discontinued operation was as follows:
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | |
Revenues | | | |
Oilfield Services | | $ | 17,730,316 | |
Drilling Fluids | | 2,319,900 | |
| | | |
Total revenues | | 20,050,216 | |
| | | |
Expenses | | | |
Cost of goods sold - drilling fluids | | 778,968 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 2,273,096 | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 17,727,094 | |
Loss on sale of assets | | 63,732 | |
Interest expense | | 1,129,459 | |
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | | 4,267,000 | |
Accretion of preferred stock liability | | 943,182 | |
Other | | (4,422 | ) |
| | | |
Total expenses | | 27,178,109 | |
| | | |
Loss before income taxes | | $ | (7,127,893 | ) |
NOTE 14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Our primary business segments are vertically integrated within the oil and gas industry. These segments are separately managed due to distinct operational differences and unique technology, distribution, and marketing requirements. Our two reportable operating segments are oil and gas exploration and professional staffing services. The oil and gas exploration and production segment explores for and produces natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and NGLs. The energy staffing segment consists of our Petro Staffing Group business, which is a full-service staffing agency providing the energy
20
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
marketplace with temporary and full-time professionals. The oilfield services segment, which consisted solely of the operations of FDF, was disposed of on May 4, 2012, and is no longer reflected within segment information.
The following tables present selected financial information of our operating segments for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Information presented below as “Corporate, Other, and Intersegment Eliminations” includes results from operating activities that are not considered operating segments, as well as corporate and certain financing activities.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we had two customers that accounted for more than 10% of our total consolidated revenues at a rate of 53% and 20% respectively.
| | Oil & Gas | | Energy Staffing | | Corporate and Intersegment Eliminations | | Total | |
As of March 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets | | $ | 1,570,769 | | $ | 57,741 | | $ | 1,708,396 | | $ | 3,336,906 | |
Restricted cash | | — | | — | | 4,313,753 | | 4,313,753 | |
Property and equipment, net | | 1,462,618 | | 3,872 | | 41,162 | | 1,507,652 | |
Deferred financing cost | | — | | — | | 12,500 | | 12,500 | |
Other assets | | 59,296 | | — | | — | | 59,296 | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,092,683 | | $ | 61,613 | | $ | 6,075,811 | | $ | 9,230,107 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | $ | 885,735 | | $ | — | | $ | 615,286 | | $ | 1,501,021 | |
Long-term debt | | 10,722 | | — | | 360,237 | | 370,959 | |
Asset retirement obligation | | 7,912 | | — | | — | | 7,912 | |
Derivative liabilities | | — | | — | | 2,510 | | 2,510 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 5,576 | | — | | — | | 5,576 | |
Mezzanine equity | | — | | — | | 5,763,869 | | 5,763,869 | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | 2,182,738 | | 61,613 | | (666,091 | ) | 1,578,260 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | $ | 3,092,683 | | $ | 61,613 | | $ | 6,075,811 | | $ | 9,230,107 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Additions to long-lived assets from continuing operations | | $ | 909,520 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,463 | | $ | 916,983 | |
| | Oil & Gas | | Energy Staffing | | Corporate and Intersegment Eliminations | | Total | |
As of March 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets | | $ | 67,896 | | $ | 871 | | $ | 37,523 | | $ | 106,290 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | 42,621 | | — | | 5,155 | | 47,776 | |
Other assets | | 9,296 | | — | | — | | 9,296 | |
Total assets | | $ | 119,813 | | $ | 871 | | $ | 42,678 | | $ | 163,362 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | $ | 705,218 | | $ | — | | $ | 3,912,574 | | $ | 4,617,792 | |
Long-term debt | | 1,209,825 | | — | | 412,500 | | 1,622,325 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 143,642 | | — | | — | | 143,642 | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | (1,938,872 | ) | 871 | | (4,282,396 | ) | (6,220,397 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | $ | 119,813 | | $ | 871 | | $ | 42,678 | | $ | 163,362 | |
21
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | Oil & Gas | | Energy Staffing | | Corporate and Intersegment Eliminations | | Total | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
Land services | | $ | 330,382 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 330,382 | |
Oil & gas sales | | 119,191 | | — | | — | | 119,191 | |
Total Revenues | | 449,573 | | — | | — | | 449,573 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and other, net: | | | | | | | | | |
Lease operating expenses | | 107,018 | | — | | — | | 107,018 | |
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | | 3,426 | | 355 | | 1,281 | | 5,062 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 263,623 | | 90,148 | | 641,030 | | 994,801 | |
Gain on sale of securities | | — | | — | | (585 | ) | (585 | ) |
Interest and dividend income | | — | | — | | (7,332 | ) | (7,332 | ) |
Interest expense | | 360 | | — | | 17,999 | | 18,359 | |
Total expenses and other, net | | 374,427 | | 90,503 | | 652,393 | | 1,117,323 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | 75,146 | | (90,503 | ) | (652,393 | ) | (667,750 | ) |
Income tax provision | | (1,810 | ) | — | | — | | (1,810 | ) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 73,336 | | $ | (90,503 | ) | $ | (652,393 | ) | $ | (669,560 | ) |
| | Oil & Gas | | Energy Staffing | | Corporate and Intersegment Eliminations | | Total | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
Land services | | $ | 950,110 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 950,110 | |
Oil & gas | | 12,430 | | — | | — | | 12,430 | |
Total Revenues | | 962,540 | | — | | — | | 962,540 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and other, net: | | | | | | | | | |
Lease operating expenses | | 6,566 | | — | | — | | 6,566 | |
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | | 18,055 | | — | | 281 | | 18,336 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 15,167 | | 24,906 | | 398,995 | | 439,068 | |
Interest expense | | 30,288 | | — | | 148,593 | | 178,881 | |
Total expenses and other, net | | 70,076 | | 24,906 | | 547,869 | | 642,851 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | 892,464 | | (24,906 | ) | (547,869 | ) | 319,689 | |
Income tax provision | | (9,547 | ) | — | | — | | (9,547 | ) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 882,917 | | $ | (24,906 | ) | $ | (547,869 | ) | $ | 310,142 | |
22
Table of Contents
NYTEX ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 15. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Additional cash flow information was as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | |
Total cash paid for interest | | $ | 1,910 | | $ | 378,048 | |
Total cash paid for taxes | | $ | 60,000 | | $ | — | |
Cash paid for interest — related party | | $ | — | | $ | 2,670 | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information: | | | | | |
Shares issued to retire debt | | $ | — | | $ | 33,000 | |
Dividend declared | | $ | — | | $ | 129,272 | |
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
Overview
NYTEX Energy Holdings, Inc. is an early-stage exploration and production (E&P) company engaged in the acquisition, development, and production of oil and gas reserves from low-risk, high rate-of-return wells in shallow carbonate reservoirs. Our strategy is to enhance value for our shareholders through the development of a well-balanced portfolio of natural resource-based assets at discounted acquisition and development costs. Further, we may acquire oilfield service companies at below-market acquisition prices that complements our portfolio of natural resource-based assets and leverages the inherent synergies across the energy industry.
We are an energy holding company consisting of two operating segments:
Oil and Gas - consisting of our wholly-owned subsidiary, NYTEX Petroleum, Inc. (“NYTEX Petroleum”), an early-stage E&P company engaged in the acquisition, development, and production of oil and gas reserves from low-risk, high rate-of-return wells in shallow carbonate reservoirs; and
Energy Staffing - consisting of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Petro Staffing Group, LLC, (“PSG”), a full-service staffing agency formed in March 2012 providing the energy marketplace with temporary and full-time professionals. On April 30, 2013, the Company elected to cease the operations of its staffing services business, Petro Staffing Group, LLC, doing business as KS Energy Search Group.
NYTEX Energy Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “NYTEX Energy,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “its,” and the “Company”.
General Industry Overview
The U.S. economy experienced a modest recovery during 2012 with much of that recovery driven by the U.S. energy industry. However, uncertainty persists as federal deficit issues continue to leave ambiguities with U.S. businesses and consumers including what policies and practices may be implemented to resolve these matters. It remains challenging to predict the economic consequences on the U.S. energy industry, specifically the supply and demand for oil and gas, as governments struggle to resolve these issues.
Oil and Gas
NYTEX Petroleum, Inc. is an exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition, development and production of oil & gas reserves from low-risk, high rate-of-return wells in shallow carbonate reservoirs. By focusing on early, low and no-cost entry into “tight oil” resource plays in North Texas, using multiple entry methods, NYTEX Petroleum has swiftly amassed interest in more than 87,000 leasehold acres. We believe these plays can be developed uniformly over expansive geographical areas with a high rate of success due to the recent advancements in horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing technologies. In the first quarter of 2013, we drilled our first two wells as the operator of record.
Discontinued Operations - Oilfield Services
Disposition of FDF
On May 4, 2012, (the “Closing Date”), Acquisition Inc., together with New Francis Oaks, entered into the Merger Agreement with the Purchaser. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, New Francis Oaks merged with and into the Purchaser, and the Purchaser continued as the surviving entity after the merger (the “Disposition” or the “Merger”). New Francis Oaks owns 100% of the outstanding shares of FDF, and, as a result of the Disposition, we no longer own FDF.
The total consideration for the Merger paid by the Purchaser on the Closing Date was $62,500,000 (the “Merger Proceeds”). After: (i) an adjustment to the amount of the Merger Proceeds based upon the level of estimated working capital of the Francis Group on the Closing Date; (ii) the payment or provision for payment of all indebtedness of the Francis Group on the Closing Date; (iii) the payment of all indebtedness of Acquisition Inc. on the Closing Date (including under its senior secured credit facility with PNC Bank; (iv) the payment of the Put Payment Amount (as defined below) due to WayPoint Nytex, LLC (“WayPoint”) under the WayPoint Purchase Agreement (as defined below); (v) the payment of all transaction expenses relating to the Merger; (vi) the payment to the Company of $812,500 of accrued management fees and $110,279 of expense reimbursement due and payable to the Company under the Management Services Agreement, dated November 23, 2010, between the Company and FDF (the “Management Agreement”); (vii) the payment of certain transaction bonuses payable to certain FDF employees; and (viii) the Purchaser’s delivery of $6,250,000 of the Merger Proceeds (the “Escrow
24
Table of Contents
Fund”) to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as escrow agent, to be held in escrow under the Escrow Agreement (as defined below) and reported as restricted cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012, Acquisition Inc. received on the Closing Date remaining cash transaction proceeds in the amount of approximately $4,481,000. The Merger Agreement provides that, to the extent that the final amount of working capital of the Francis Group on the Closing Date is greater than the estimated amount of working capital, as determined under the Merger Agreement, the Purchaser will pay to Acquisition Inc. the amount of such working capital surplus, provided that, pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement (as defined below), WayPoint is entitled to receive 87.5% of any such working capital surplus payment. To the extent that the final amount of working capital of the Francis Group on the Closing Date is less than the estimated amount of working capital, Acquisition Inc. will pay to the Purchaser the amount of such working capital deficit, which payment will be made out of the Escrow Fund, provided that, pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement, WayPoint is obligated to pay to Acquisition Inc. 87.5% of the amount of any such working capital deficit.
In connection with the consummation of the Merger, we entered into an Omnibus Agreement (the “Omnibus Agreement”) with WayPoint and the Francis Group. The Omnibus Agreement became effective upon the consummation of the Merger.
Pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement, upon the consummation of the Merger:
(i) the Management Agreement was terminated;
(ii) Waypoint paid $150,000 to the Company out of the Put Payment Amount due and payable to WayPoint;
(iii) the Company was paid $812,500 from the Merger Proceeds, which sum represented accrued management fees due and payable to the Company from FDF under the Management Agreement; and
(iv) the Company was paid $110,279 from the Merger Proceeds, which sum represented reimbursement by FDF of certain expenses previously incurred by the Company in respect of certain professional services provided, and which reimbursement was due and payable to the Company from FDF under the Management Agreement.
In the Omnibus Agreement, the Company, WayPoint, and the Francis Group also agreed to mutual releases from and to each other, and their related parties, relating to facts existing on or before the Closing Date that relate to the Merger, the WayPoint Purchase Agreement, the related documents, and the relations among the parties. The releases also covered claims that any of the parties could assert against any employees of the FDF Group. In addition, the parties agreed that WayPoint would bear 87.5% of any post-closing working capital deficit under the Merger Agreement and WayPoint would receive 87.5% of any post-closing working capital surplus under the Merger Agreement.
Further, in connection with the consummation of the Merger, we entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with WayPoint, the Francis Group, and Michael G. Francis and Bryan Francis (together, the “Francises”). The Settlement Agreement became effective upon the consummation of the Merger.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, upon the consummation of the Merger:
(i) WayPoint paid out of the Put Payment Amount a $100,000 bonus to Michael G. Francis, the President of NYTEX Acquisition, and a $25,000 bonus to Jude N. Gregory, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Acquisition Inc.;
(ii) (A) the Company caused the release of the $1,800,000 of Escrowed Cash (as defined in the Escrow Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2010, by and among Acquisition Inc., Bryan Francis and The F&M Bank & Trust Company (the “Francis Escrow Agreement”)) then being held in escrow pursuant to the Francis Escrow Agreement, in accordance with the terms of the Francis Escrow Agreement, and (B) Michael G. Francis transferred and assigned back to the Company 625,000 shares of common stock of the Company then owned by Michael G. Francis and originally issued to him pursuant to the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2010 (the “Francis Purchase Agreement”), and then being held in escrow pursuant to the Francis Escrow Agreement;
(iii) (A) Michael G. Francis transferred and assigned back to the Company all of the remaining 2,197,063 shares of common stock then owned by him and originally issued to him pursuant to the Francis Purchase Agreement, and (B) Bryan Francis transferred and assigned back to the Company all of the 381,607 shares of common stock originally issued to him pursuant to the Francis Purchase Agreement, as well as all of the 27,225 shares of NYTEX Common Stock issued to him in connection with his employment by FDF;
(iv) the employment agreements of Michael G. Francis and Bryan Francis terminated and they became at-will employees of the FDF Group;
(v) each of the three designees of WayPoint then serving as directors of Acquisition Inc., which included John
25
Table of Contents
Henry Moulton, Thomas Drechsler and Lee Buchwald, resigned as directors of Acquisition Inc., effective immediately upon the consummation of the Merger; and
(vi) in exchange for receipt by WayPoint of the Put Payment Amount (which consisted of $30,000,000, less an aggregate of $306,639 of dividends previously received by WayPoint on account of the WayPoint Senior Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock, less an aggregate of $275,000 payable by WayPoint to the Company, Michael G. Francis and Jude N. Gregory pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, less an additional $449,072 (representing 87.5% of the estimated working capital deficit of the Francis Companies on the Closing Date, but subject to the right of WayPoint to subsequently receive 87.5% of any final working capital surplus of the Francis Companies on the Closing Date and the obligation of WayPoint to subsequently pay 87.5% of any final working capital deficit of the Francis Companies on the Closing Date, pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement); the “Put Payment Amount”), WayPoint transferred and assigned (A) the Senior Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock back to Acquisition Inc., (B) the Purchaser Warrant and the Control Warrant back to the Company, and (C) the WayPoint Series B Share back to the Company, and all such securities were cancelled.
In the Settlement Agreement, the Company, WayPoint, the Francis Group, and the Francises also agreed to mutual releases from and to each other, and their related parties, relating to facts existing on or before the Closing Date that relate to the Merger, the WayPoint Purchase Agreement, the related documents, and the relations among the parties, including in connection with any employment agreements or arrangements of the Francises. The releases also covered claims that any of the parties could assert against any employees of the FDF Group.
In August 2012, the Purchaser delivered a proposed final closing statement, which included, among other things, a calculation of the final closing date net working capital, to the Company. Under the terms of the Omnibus Agreement, WayPoint agreed to bear 87.5% of any post-closing working capital deficit and conversely, we granted to WayPoint the authority to make all decisions, including the right to dispute any item contained in the final closing date net working capital, on our behalf with regards to the proposed final closing statement and final closing date net working capital.
In November 2012, WayPoint delivered to the Purchaser a notice of disagreement disputing certain items in the proposed closing statement and calculation of the final closing date net working capital. In January 2013, NYTEX, WayPoint, and the Purchaser agreed in principal to the final closing statement amounts, along with the calculation of the final closing date net working capital. Part of this agreement in principal included the planned release of funds from the Escrow Fund to the Purchaser in the amount of $1,936,762 (“Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow”).
A dispute between NYTEX and WayPoint arose with regards to the amounts due under the Omnibus Agreement to NYTEX with respect to WayPoint’s obligation to bear 87.5% of the Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow. Following substantial negotiations, on March 8, 2013, NYTEX and WayPoint agreed to settle this dispute such that WayPoint would pay to NYTEX $1,075,000 to satisfy its obligation under the Omnibus Agreement. On March 14, 2013, NYTEX was paid $1,075,000 and on March 15, 2013, the Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow was released to the Purchaser. As the events that gave rise to both NYTEX’s settlement with WayPoint and the release from escrow of the Net Payment to Purchaser from Escrow existed as of December 31, 2012, the amount paid by WayPoint of $1,075,000 has been recognized as a receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012. In addition, the amount of funds to be released from the Escrow Fund of $1,936,762 has been recognized as a reserve against the restricted cash balance on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012.
26
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Selected Data
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Financial Results | | | | | |
Reveneus - Land Lease | | $ | 330,382 | | $ | 950,110 | |
Revenues - Oil and Gas sales | | 119,191 | | 12,430 | |
| | | | | |
Total revenues | | 449,573 | | 962,540 | |
| | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | 1,106,881 | | 463,970 | |
Total other (income) expense | | 10,442 | | 178,881 | |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | (667,750 | ) | 319,689 | |
Income tax provision | | (1,810 | ) | (9,547 | ) |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | 310,142 | |
| | | | | |
Operating Results | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA - Oil and Gas | | $ | 78,932 | | | (2) |
Adjusted EBITDA - Staffing Services | | (90,148 | ) | | (2) |
Adjusted EBITDA - Corporate and Intersegment Eliminations | | (633,698 | ) | | (2) |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1) | | $ | (644,914 | ) | $ | 516,906 | |
(1)See Results of Operations—Adjusted EBITDA for a description of Adjusted EBITDA, which is not a U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) measure, and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, which is presented in accordance with GAAP.
(2)Due to the disposition of FDF, the Company operated as a single segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
Three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012
On May 4, 2012, our subsidiary, FDF, was sold to an unaffiliated third party and is accounted for as a discontinued operation. As a result, all financial information included in this report including information contained within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read and considered in such context.
Revenues. Revenues from continuing operations decreased $512,967 for the three ended March 31, 2013 compared to the prior year period. This was primarily due to a decrease from land services revenue of $619,728 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in land services revenue is directly related to the timing of our ability to purchase and sell oil and gas leasehold properties. Our land services provide focused project management for companies looking to acquire and build positions in lease plays throughout North and West Texas. From generating land and mineral title reports, leasehold title analysis and reports, and land title run sheets to sourcing, negotiating and acquiring leases, document preparation, and performing title curative functions. We anticipate revenues from land services and oil & gas sales to increase over time as we continue to focus on opportunities in recently discovered resource plays in Texas and North America.
Revenues from oil and gas sales increased to $119,191 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $12,430 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in oil and gas revenue is related to the continued growth of our oil and gas business as we seek to actively participate in oil and gas drilling projects in the lease plays we have identified throughout North Texas.
Oil & gas lease operating expenses. Lease operating expenses from continuing operations increased $100,452 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2012. The change is due to an overall increase related to drilling activity on wells in which we have a working interest.
27
Table of Contents
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization (“DD&A”) from continuing operations decreased over the prior period primarily as a result of certain long-lived assets that either became fully depreciated or were disposed during 2012.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses from continuing operations increased for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the prior year three months ended March 31, 2012. This increase was due to an overall increase in professional fees and expenses in the quarter including accounting and legal costs, and increases in payroll related costs due in part to the increase in personnel. SG&A consists primarily of salary and wages, contract labor, professional fees, lease rental costs, and insurance costs.
Interest expense. Interest expense associated with continuing operations decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the prior year period due to (i) a general reduction in the outstanding principal balances of our outstanding debt, and (ii) in June 2012, an early redemption of the 9% and 12% convertible debentures.
Income tax provision. The income tax provision from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2103 of $1,810 is the result of utilizing existing and current net operating losses to offset taxable income generated by our oil and gas segment. The provision is due to limitations placed on our ability to fully offset taxable income by available net operating loss carryforwards.
Adjusted EBITDA
To assess the continuing operating results of our segments, our chief operating decision maker analyzes net income (loss) before income taxes, interest expense, DD&A, impairments, gains or losses resulting from the sale of assets or resolution of commercial disputes, changes in fair value attributable to derivative liabilities, and discontinued operations (“Adjusted EBITDA”). Our definition of Adjusted EBITDA, which is not a GAAP measure, excludes interest expense to allow for assessment of segment operating results without regard to our financing methods or capital structure. Similarly, DD&A and impairments are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of segment operating performance because capital expenditures are evaluated at the time capital costs are incurred. In addition, changes in fair value attributable to derivative liabilities and the accretion of preferred stock liability are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA since these unrealized (gains) losses are not considered to be a measure of asset-operating performance. Management believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information useful in assessing the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and that Adjusted EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company’s ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and make distributions to stockholders.
Adjusted EBITDA, as we define it, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Therefore, our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in conjunction with net income (loss) and other performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, such as operating income or cash flow from operating activities. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes certain items that affect net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Below is a reconciliation of consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated net income (loss) to common stockholders as reported on our consolidated statements of operations.
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP Net Income (Loss): | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (669,560 | ) | $ | (6,568,011 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | — | | 6,878,153 | |
Income tax provision | | 1,810 | | 9,547 | |
Interest expense | | 18,359 | | 178,881 | |
DD&A | | 5,062 | | 18,336 | |
Gain on sale of securities | | (585 | ) | — | |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | (644,914 | ) | $ | 516,906 | |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our working capital needs have historically been satisfied through operations, equity and debt investments from private investors, loans with financial institutions, and through the sale of assets. Historically, our primary use of cash has been to pay for acquisitions and investments, service our debt, and for general working capital requirements. As of March 31, 2013, we have cash and marketable securities less the cash portion of deposits held in trust totaling $2,196,896
28
Table of Contents
that we have available, along with cash flow from operations, to provide capital to support the growth of our business, service our debt, and for general working capital requirements.
On July 11, 2012, we entered into a revolving line of credit agreement with a commercial bank providing for loans up to $325,000. The revolving credit line bears an annual interest rate based on the 30 day LIBOR plus 1.95% and matures on July 11, 2014. The line of credit is secured by our marketable securities. We pay no fee for the unused portion of the revolving line of credit. At March 31, 2013 and as of the date of this report, amounts available under the revolving line of credit were $216,645.
Redemption of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
On March 28, 2013, we provided notice to the holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (a “Series A Holder”) of our election to redeem, on May 1, 2013 (the “Redemption Date”), an aggregate $1,000,000 in principal amount of outstanding shares of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $1.00 per share. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will be redeemed pro rata based on the number of shares held by the Series A Holder relative to the total number of Series A Convertible Preferred shares outstanding as of the Redemption Date.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows and has been derived from our unaudited financial statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
| | Three Months Ended March, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Cash flow provided by operating activities | | $ | 1,592,055 | | $ | 3,016,021 | |
Cash flow used in investing activities | | (825,981 | ) | (274,074 | ) |
Cash flow used in financing activities | | (84,783 | ) | (2,712,839 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 681,291 | | 29,108 | |
Beginning cash and cash equivalents | | 1,484,386 | | 10,817 | |
| | | | | |
Ending cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,165,677 | | $ | 39,925 | |
Cash flows from operating activities decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2013 by $1,423,966 compared to cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This decrease was mainly due to a reduction in non-cash adjustments over the prior year totaling $7,282,919. This amount was offset by a decrease in the net loss of $5,898,451 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. There was also an overall reduction in working capital of $39,498.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 were $825,981 compared to cash used of $274,074 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The change primarily represents cash outflows of $879,469 related to investments in oil and gas properties. These outflows were offset by a reduction in cash outflows year over year related to additions of property and equipment of $263,173 as well as an increase year over year in proceeds from the sale of assets of $67,123.
Cash flows used in financing activities were $84,783 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to cash used in financing activities of $2,712,839 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The overall change is primarily related to the disposition of FDF, and the retirement of the debt related to that entity. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the financing activity consisted of payments on notes payable. There were no additional borrowings during this period.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies
Preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We believe the most complex and sensitive
29
Table of Contents
judgments, because of their significance to the Consolidated Financial Statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results in these areas could differ from management’s estimates. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting estimates during the first three months of 2013.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information is not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management performed an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2013.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system cannot provide absolute assurance due to its inherent limitations; it is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. A control system also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of such limitations, disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting cannot prevent or detect all misstatements, whether unintentional errors or fraud. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
30
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
At March 31, 2013, the Company was a party to lawsuits that were incurred in the normal course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is considered material by management in relation to the Company’s financial position or results of operations. In management’s opinion, the Company’s consolidated financial statements would not be materially affected by the outcome of these legal proceedings, commitments, or asserted claims.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the company’s risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits set forth on the accompanying Exhibit Index have been filed as part of this Form 10-Q.
31
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NYTEX Energy Holdings, Inc. |
| |
| By: | /s/ Michael K. Galvis |
| | Michael K. Galvis |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
May 13, 2013
32
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | | Document |
| | |
2.1 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 4, 2012, by and among FDF Resources Holdings LLC, New Francis Oaks, LLC and NYTEX FDF Acquisition, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed May 10, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
3.1 | | Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-12G/A filed August 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
3.2 | | Bylaws of Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-12G/A filed August 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.1 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation in respect of Senior Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.2 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation in respect of Senior Series B Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.3 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation in respect of Series A convertible Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.4 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation in respect of Senior Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.5 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation in respect of Senior Series B Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.6 | | NYTEX Energy Holdings, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.7 | | NYTEX Energy Holdings, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with on February 7, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
31.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
31.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32.1* | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*** |
| | |
101.INS** | | XBRL Instance Document. |
| | |
101.SCH** | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. |
| | |
101.CAL** | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. |
| | |
101.DEF** | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. |
33
Table of Contents
101.LAB** | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. |
| | |
101.PRE** | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. |
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
*** In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
34