New Accounting Standards | New Accounting Standards Adopted in the current period In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , which modifies how all entities recognize revenue, and consolidates into one ASC Topic (FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ) the guidance found in FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition , and various other revenue accounting standards for specialized transactions and industries. FASB ASC Topic 606 outlines a comprehensive five-step revenue recognition model based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We adopted FASB ASC Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. Refer to Note 16, "Revenue Recognition," for additional details on this implementation and the required disclosures. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities , which addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The new recognition and measurement guidance requires entities to measure equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method, those that result in consolidation of the investee, and certain other investments) either at fair value, with changes to fair value recognized in net income, or, in certain instances, by use of a measurement alternative. Under the measurement alternative, such investments are measured at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018, which resulted in no impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. Refer to Note 11, "Fair Value Measures," for further detail regarding the application of the measurement alternative to our $50.0 million equity investment in Series B Preferred Stock of Quanergy, Inc ("Quanergy"), which does not have a readily determinable fair value. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost , which requires a change in the presentation of net periodic benefit cost on the consolidated statements of operations. Specifically, entities must present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same financial statement line item(s) as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the related employees during the period, whereas the non–service components of net periodic benefit cost must be presented separately from the financial statement line item(s) that include service cost and outside of operating income. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and, as a result, we present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the Cost of revenue, Research and development, and Selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") expense line items, and we present the non–service components of net periodic benefit cost in Other, net. Refer to Note 13, "Other, net," for the total other components of net periodic benefit cost. All prior period amounts have been recast to reflect the revised presentation, and the adjustments made to revise the presentation of our prior year condensed consolidated statement of operations are presented in Note 8, "Pension and Other Post–Retirement Benefits." To be adopted in a future period In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) , which establishes new accounting and disclosure requirements for leases. FASB ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to classify most leases as either finance or operating leases and to initially recognize a lease liability and right-of-use asset. Entities may elect to account for certain short-term leases (with a term of one year or less) using a method similar to the current operating lease model. The statements of operations will include, for finance leases, separate recognition of interest on the lease liability and amortization of the right-of-use asset and for operating leases, a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a straight-line basis. At December 31, 2017, we were contractually obligated to make future payments of $68.6 million under our operating lease obligations in existence as of that date, primarily related to long-term facility leases. While we are in the early stages of our implementation process for FASB ASU No. 2016-02 and have not yet determined its impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations, these leases would potentially be required to be presented on the balance sheet in accordance with the requirements of FASB ASU No. 2016-02, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. FASB ASU No. 2016-02 must be applied using a modified retrospective approach, which requires the recognition and measurement of leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented, with certain practical expedients available. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) , which changes both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results, in order to better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships. The amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. FASB ASU No. 2017-12 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of FASB ASU No. 2017-12 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. Revenue Recognition I n May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , which modifies how all entities recognize revenue, and consolidates into one Accounting Standards Codification Topic (FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ) the guidance found in FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition , and various other revenue accounting standards for specialized transactions and industries. FASB ASC Topic 606 outlines a comprehensive five-step revenue recognition model based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We adopted FASB ASC Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the vast majority of our revenue was derived from the sale of tangible products for which we recognize revenue at a point in time. The contracts that relate to these product shipments are purchase orders that have firm purchase commitments generally only for a short period of time. As a result, the adoption of FASB ASC Topic 606 did not have a material effect on our financial statements or results of operations, and no cumulative catch-up adjustment was required. We used the related practical expedients that allow us to not disclose the transaction price allocated to remaining unsatisfied obligations and an explanation of when we expect to recognize the related revenue. In adopting FASB ASC Topic 606, we applied the new guidance only to contracts that were not completed on January 1, 2018. The following table presents revenue by segment, further disaggregated by end-market: For the three months ended March 31, 2018 Performance Sensing Sensing Solutions Total Automotive $ 529,793 $ 13,856 $ 543,649 HVOR 133,036 — 133,036 Appliance and HVAC — 54,317 54,317 Industrial — 82,385 82,385 Aerospace — 41,706 41,706 Other — 31,200 31,200 Total $ 662,829 $ 223,464 $ 886,293 Performance Obligations Our revenue and related cost of revenue are primarily the result of promises to transfer products to our customers. Revenue is recognized when our performance obligation has been met, which is generally when the product is shipped from our warehouse or, in limited instances, when it is received by the customer, depending on the specific terms of the arrangement. Product sales are recorded net of value-added tax and similar taxes. Amounts billed to our customers for shipping and handling are recorded in revenue. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenue. Sales to customers generally include a right of return for defective or non-conforming product. Sales returns have not historically been significant in relation to our net revenue and have been within our estimates. Product sales are recorded net of variable consideration, such as trade discounts (including volume and early payment incentives) and sales returns. Our standard terms of sale provide our customers with a warranty against faulty workmanship and the use of defective materials, which, depending on the product, generally exists for a period of twelve to eighteen months after the date we ship the product to our customer or for a period of twelve months after the date the customer resells our product, whichever comes first. We do not offer separately priced extended warranty or product maintenance contracts. Our liability associated with this warranty is, at our option, to repair the product, replace the product, or provide the customer with a credit. We also sell products to customers under negotiated agreements or where we have accepted the customer’s terms of purchase. In these instances, we may provide additional warranties for longer durations, consistent with differing end market practices, and where our liability is not limited. In addition, many sales take place in situations where commercial or civil codes, or other laws, would imply various warranties and restrict limitations on liability. Payment for products is due in accordance with the terms agreed upon with customers, generally within 90 days of shipment to the customer. Accordingly, our contracts with customers do not include a significant financing component. Contract Assets and Liabilities We generally invoice the customer and recognize revenue once we have satisfied our performance obligation. Accordingly, our contract assets comprise accounts receivable. In certain cases, we receive payment by customers related to our promise to satisfy performance obligations in the future. Such payments are recorded as contract liabilities, which are not material. |