Auxillium Energy (AXLM) 10-K 31 Mar 14 2013 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 24, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Document And Entity Information	'	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'Auxillium Energy Inc.	'	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001478132	'	'
Document Type	'10-K	'	'
Document Period End Date	31-Dec-13	'	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--12-31	'	'
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	'No	'	'
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	'No	'	'
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	'Yes	'	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'	'
Entity Public Float	'	'	$1,372,000
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	134,300,000	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'FY	'	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2013	'	'

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current assets:	'	'
Cash	$46	$97
Total Current Assets	46	97
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method):	95,295	95,295
Total assets	95,341	95,392
Current liabilities:	'	'
Accrued expenses	41,692	24,648
Advances from stockholders	123,013	67,098
Total current liabilities	164,705	91,746
Total liabilities	164,705	91,746
Stockholders' equity (deficit):	'	'
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	0	0
Common stock at $0.001 par value: 750,000,000 shares authorized, 134,300,000 shares issued and outstanding	13,430	13,430
Additional paid-in capital	171,040	171,040
Accumulated deficit	-34,470	-34,470
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage	-219,364	-146,354
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)	-69,364	3,646
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$95,341	$95,392

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Preferred Stock	'	'
Preferred stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred stock, authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, issued	0	0
COMMON STOCK	'	'
Common Stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, Authorized	750,000,000	750,000,000
Common stock, Issued	134,300,000	134,300,000

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Loss) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		28 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Revenues	'	'	'
Revenues earned during the exploration stage	$0	$0	$0
Cost of revenues during the exploration stage:	'	'	'
State license fees	28,800	28,800	81,600
Gross margin	-28,800	-28,800	-81,600
Operating expenses:	'	'	'
General and administrative expenses	2,284	954	4,366
Professional fees	41,926	52,212	133,398
Total operating expenses	44,210	53,166	137,764
Loss before income tax provision	-73,010	-81,966	-219,364
Income tax provision	0	0	0
Net loss	($73,010)	($81,966)	($219,364)
Net loss per common share	'	'	'
Basic and diluted:	$0	$0	'
Weighted average common shares outstanding	'	'	'
- Basic and diluted	134,300,000	134,300,000	'

Consolidated_Statement_of_Stoc

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (USD $)	Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value	Additional Paid-in Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage	Total
Beginning Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2010	$12,430	$21,870	($27,867)	$0	$6,433
Beginning Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2010	124,300,000	'	'	'	'
Forgiveness of debt by former stockholders	'	170	'	'	170
Issuance of common shares for cash at $0.15 per share in December 2011, shares	10,000,000	'	'	'	'
Issuance of common shares for cash at $0.15 per share in December 2011, amount	1,000	149,000	'	'	150,000
Net loss	'	'	-6,603	-64,388	-70,991
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2011	13,430	171,040	-34,470	-64,388	85,612
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2011	134,300,000	'	'	'	'
Forgiveness of debt by former stockholders	'	'	'	'	0
Net loss	'	'	'	-81,966	-81,966
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2012	13,430	171,040	-34,470	-146,354	3,646
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2012	134,300,000	'	'	'	'
Net loss	'	'	'	-73,010	-73,010
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2013	$13,430	$171,040	($34,470)	($219,364)	($69,364)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2013	134,300,000	'	'	'	'

Consolidated_Statement_of_Stoc1

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]	'
Price per common share	$0.15

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended		28 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:	'	'	'
Net loss	($73,010)	($81,966)	($219,364)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	'	'	'
Accrued expenses	17,044	11,783	41,692
Net cash used in operating activities	-55,966	-70,183	-177,672
Cash flows from investing activities:	'	'	'
Purchase of unproved oil and gas property acreage	0	0	95,295
Net cash used in investing activities	0	0	-95,295
Cash flows from financing activities:	'	'	'
Advances received from stockholders	55,915	24,466	123,013
Proceeds from sale of common stock	0	0	150,000
Net cash provided by financing activities	55,915	24,466	273,013
Net change in cash	-51	-45,717	46
Cash at beginning of period	97	45,814	0
Cash at end of period	46	97	46
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:	'	'	'
Interest paid	0	0	0
Income tax paid	$0	$0	$0

Note_1_Organization_and_Operat

Note 1 - Organization and Operations	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 1 - Organization and Operations	'
	Note 1 – Organization and Operations
	Auxillium Energy Inc. (formerly Selga Inc.)
	Selga Inc. (“Selga”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on November 9, 2009.
	Selga intended to export new and used cars from the United States to South America, Europe and Africa upon formation through August 29, 2011 (the date of discontinuance of auto export business). On August 29, 2011 the management of the Company decided to investigate and commercially pursue the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties. On February 6, 2013, Selga filed Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, and changed its name from Selga Inc. to Auxillium Energy Inc. (“Auxillium Energy” or the “Company”).
	Acquisition of Auxuillium Spółka Zograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością in Poland
	On July 11, 2011 a share sale agreement was entered into by and between Selga Inc. and House Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością. Under the terms of the share sale agreement, Selga purchased all of the shares of Auxillium Spółka zograniczoną odpowiedzialnością (“Auxillium Poland”), a Polish corporation for 2,653 Zlotys (approximately $953). Upon consummation of the share sale agreement, Auxillium Spółka zograniczoną odpowiedzialnością was established as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Selga Inc., and tasked with investigating oil and gas opportunities in Poland.
	Auxillium Poland is currently inactive.
	Formation of Auxillium Alaska, Inc.
	On August 18, 2011, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Auxillium Alaska Inc., registered and incorporated under the laws of the state of Alaska, to engage in oil and gas exploration activities in Alaska. Prior to August 29, 2011 (the date of acquisition of the oil and gas properties), Auxillium Alaska Inc. is inactive.

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
	Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
	Basis of Presentation
	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
	Exploration Stage Company
	Although the Company started to investigate and commercially pursue the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties upon acquisition of oil and gas properties on August 29, 2011, a substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved establishing the business and the Company has neither started exploring the oil and gas properties, nor generated any revenue to date. Upon entry into the oil and gas exploration business the Company became an exploration stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. All activities since August 29, 2011 have been considered as part of the Company’s exploration stage activities.
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:
	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
			(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	Auxillium Energy, Inc.	Nevada	9-Nov-09	100%
	Auxillium Poland	Republic of Poland	11-Jul-11	100%
	Auxillium Alaska	Alaska	18-Aug-11	100%
	The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, Auxillium Poland, and Auxillium Alaska as of the reporting period ending date(s) and for the reporting period(s) then ended.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include unproved oil and gas properties, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized oil and gas properties taking into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous oil and gas operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. When a determination is made that a project or property will be abandoned, or its carrying value will be impaired, a provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property.
	The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
	Oil and Gas Properties
	The Company follows Topic 932 “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Topic 932”) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its oil and gas properties and accounts for its oil and gas exploration and production activities using the successful efforts method. Under this method, all property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and development wells are capitalized when incurred, pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves. If an exploratory well does not find proved reserves, the costs of drilling the well are charged to expense and included within cash flows from investing activities in the statements of cash flows pursuant to Topic 932. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether productive or nonproductive. Oil and gas lease acquisition costs are also capitalized. Interest cost is capitalized as a component of property cost for significant exploration and development projects that require greater than six months to be readied for their intended use.
	Other exploration costs, including certain geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for oil and gas leases, are charged to expense as incurred. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate. A gain or loss is recognized for all other sales of proved properties and is classified in other operating revenues. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.
	Unevaluated properties are assessed periodically on a property-by-property basis and any impairment in value is charged to expense. If the unevaluated properties are subsequently determined to be productive, the related costs are transferred to proved oil and gas properties. Proceeds from sales of partial interests in unproved leases are accounted for as a recovery of cost without recognizing any gain until all costs are recovered.
	The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of oil and gas properties is calculated on a field-by-field basis using the unit-of-production method. Oil is converted to natural gas equivalents, Mcf, at the rate of one barrel to six Mcf. Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values.
	To date, the Company has no declared oil and gas reserves.
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amount due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
	Commitments and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
	The Company will derive revenue primarily from the sale of produced natural gas and crude oil. The Company reports revenue as the gross amount received before taking into account production taxes and transportation costs, which are reported as separate expenses. Revenue is recorded in the month the Company’s production is delivered to the purchaser, but payment is generally received between thirty (30) and ninety (90) days after the date of production. No revenue is recognized unless it is determined that title to the product has transferred to the purchaser. At the end of each month, the Company estimates the amount of production delivered to the purchaser and the price the Company will receive.
	Income Tax Provision
	The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.
Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control
Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.
There were no potentially outstanding dilutive shares for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date." This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note_3_Going_Concern

Note 3 - Going Concern	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 3 - Going Concern	'
	Note 3 – Going Concern
	The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the exploration stage at December 31, 2013, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	The Company is attempting to commence explorations and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds.
	The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note_4_Oil_and_Gas_Properties

Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties	'
	Note 4 – Oil and Gas Properties
	Oil and Gas Properties in the State of Alaska
	On August 29, 2011 Auxillium Alaska Inc. entered into an agreement to acquire an oil and gas prospect in Alaska’s North Slope region from Union Energy (Alaska), LLC (the “Leases”). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to pay $95,295 to Union Energy (Alaska), LLC and $24,000 to the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources. Furthermore, pursuant to such agreement Union Energy (Alaska) LLC will deliver to Auxillium Alaska an 81.25% Net Revenue Interest in the Leases and retain a 6.25% overriding royalty interest on additional oil and gas leaseholds acquired or purchased by Auxillium Alaska within the Prospect Area of Mutual Interest (“AMI”) with the remaining 12.5% as royalty interest to be paid to the State of Alaska. Auxillium Alaska and Union will be subject to the AMI relating to the Properties.
	On August 31, 2011 the Company paid $24,000 due to the State of Alaska and on December 28, 2011 the Company made the full payment of $95,295 owed to Union Energy (Alaska), LLC for the Leases pursuant to the agreement. With the balance of $95,295 paid to Union Energy (Alaska) LLC, there are no further payments or monies owed to Union Energy (Alaska) LLC and the Company has received assignment of the leases. Under the terms of the leases, there are oil and gas rental payments that the Company is required to pay to the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources annually to maintain the leases. The payments are due on September 1st of each year.
	On August 31, 2013 and 2012, Auxillium Alaska paid $28,800 due to the State of Alaska under their two (2) leases, respectively.
		(i)	Impairment Test
	The Company completed its annual impairment testing of mining properties and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of mining properties, substantially exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2013.
		(ii)	Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Expenses
	No depreciation, depletion and amortization was recorded for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 as the Company has not yet commenced operations.

Note_5_Related_Party_Transacti

Note 5 - Related Party Transactions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 5 - Related Party Transactions	'
	Note 5 – Related Party Transactions
	Advances from Stockholders
	From time to time, the principal stockholder and CEO of the Company advances funds to the Company for working capital purposes. These advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
	The major stockholder and officer advanced $42,632 to the Company for the period from July 1, 2011 (change of control) through December 31, 2011.
	The principal shareholder and CEO advanced $24,466 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2012.
	The principal shareholder and CEO advanced $55,915 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013.
	No repayments have been made on any advances from stockholders.

Note_6_Stockholders_Deficit

Note 6 - Stockholders' Deficit	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 6 - Stockholders' Deficit	'
	Note 6 – Stockholders’ Deficit
	Shares Authorized
	Upon formation the total number of shares of common stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Seventy Five Million (75,000,000) shares, par value $.001 per share.
	Certificate of Change to the Certificate of Incorporation
	On December 21, 2012, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. The Certificate of Change effectuated a ten for one (10:1) forward stock split (the “Stock Split”) and certain other changes as set forth herein. As a result of the filing of the Certificate of Change, (i) each of the 13,430,000 issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, was changed to the ten (10) shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; (ii) the number of outstanding shares of common stock was increased from 13,430,000 to 134,300,000 shares; (iii) the par value of the Registrant’s common stock was changed from $0.001 per share to $0.0001 per share; and (iv) the number of shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to issue was increased from 75,000,000 shares to 750,000,000 shares.
	All shares and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the Stock Split.
	Common Stock
	On December 24, 2009, the Company issued 100,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.0001 per share for total cash proceeds of $10,000.
	In May and June 2010, the Company issued 16,900,000 shares of common stock at $0.001 per share for total cash proceeds of $16,900. In July and August 2010, the Company issues 7,400,000 shares of common stock at $0.001 per share for total cash proceeds of $7,400.
	In December 2011, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at $0.015 per share to two (2) investors for total cash proceeds of $150,000.
	Additional Paid-in Capital
	On April 1, 2011, as part of the change in control the former sole stockholder and officer agreed to forgive debt outstanding to him totaling $170 which has been recorded as contributed capital.

Note_7_Income_Tax_Provision

Note 7 - Income Tax Provision	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 7 - Income Tax Provision	'
	Note 7 – Income Tax Provision
	Deferred Tax Assets
	At December 31, 2013, the Company has available for federal income tax purposes a net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of $253,834 that may be used to offset future taxable income through the fiscal year ending December 31, 2033. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements since the Company believes that the realization of its net deferred tax asset of approximately $86,303 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by the full valuation allowance.
	Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realization.  The valuation allowance increased approximately $24,823 and $27,873 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:
		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12
	Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	86,303		$	61,480
	Less valuation allowance		(86,303	)		(61,480	)
	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-
	Income Tax Provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
	A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows:
		For the Year			For the Year
		Ended			Ended
		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12
	Federal statutory income tax rate		34	%		34	%
	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)
	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%
	Tax Returns Remaining subject to IRS Audits
	The Company has not yet filed its corporation income tax returns for the reporting period from November 9, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2013, all of which will remain subject to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three (3) years from the date they are filed.

Note_8_Subsequent_Events

Note 8 - Subsequent Events	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 8 - Subsequent Events	'
	Note 8 – Subsequent Events
	The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed.

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_1

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Basis of Presentation	'
	Basis of Presentation
	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Exploration Stage Company	'
	Exploration Stage Company
	Although the Company started to investigate and commercially pursue the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties upon acquisition of oil and gas properties on August 29, 2011, a substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved establishing the business and the Company has neither started exploring the oil and gas properties, nor generated any revenue to date. Upon entry into the oil and gas exploration business the Company became an exploration stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. All activities since August 29, 2011 have been considered as part of the Company’s exploration stage activities.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions	'
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation	'
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:
	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
			(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	Auxillium Energy, Inc.	Nevada	9-Nov-09	100%
	Auxillium Poland	Republic of Poland	11-Jul-11	100%
	Auxillium Alaska	Alaska	18-Aug-11	100%
	The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, Auxillium Poland, and Auxillium Alaska as of the reporting period ending date(s) and for the reporting period(s) then ended.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	'
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	'
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include unproved oil and gas properties, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized oil and gas properties taking into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous oil and gas operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. When a determination is made that a project or property will be abandoned, or its carrying value will be impaired, a provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property.
	The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.
Cash Equivalents	'
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Oil and Gas Properties	'
	Oil and Gas Properties
	The Company follows Topic 932 “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Topic 932”) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its oil and gas properties and accounts for its oil and gas exploration and production activities using the successful efforts method. Under this method, all property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and development wells are capitalized when incurred, pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves. If an exploratory well does not find proved reserves, the costs of drilling the well are charged to expense and included within cash flows from investing activities in the statements of cash flows pursuant to Topic 932. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether productive or nonproductive. Oil and gas lease acquisition costs are also capitalized. Interest cost is capitalized as a component of property cost for significant exploration and development projects that require greater than six months to be readied for their intended use.
	Other exploration costs, including certain geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for oil and gas leases, are charged to expense as incurred. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate. A gain or loss is recognized for all other sales of proved properties and is classified in other operating revenues. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.
	Unevaluated properties are assessed periodically on a property-by-property basis and any impairment in value is charged to expense. If the unevaluated properties are subsequently determined to be productive, the related costs are transferred to proved oil and gas properties. Proceeds from sales of partial interests in unproved leases are accounted for as a recovery of cost without recognizing any gain until all costs are recovered.
	The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of oil and gas properties is calculated on a field-by-field basis using the unit-of-production method. Oil is converted to natural gas equivalents, Mcf, at the rate of one barrel to six Mcf. Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values.
	To date, the Company has no declared oil and gas reserves.
Related Parties	'
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amount due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitments and Contingencies	'
	Commitments and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition	'
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
	The Company will derive revenue primarily from the sale of produced natural gas and crude oil. The Company reports revenue as the gross amount received before taking into account production taxes and transportation costs, which are reported as separate expenses. Revenue is recorded in the month the Company’s production is delivered to the purchaser, but payment is generally received between thirty (30) and ninety (90) days after the date of production. No revenue is recognized unless it is determined that title to the product has transferred to the purchaser. At the end of each month, the Company estimates the amount of production delivered to the purchaser and the price the Company will receive.
Income Tax Provision	'
	Income Tax Provision
	The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
	Uncertain Tax Positions
	The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.
	Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control
	Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share	'
	Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
	Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.
	There were no potentially outstanding dilutive shares for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.
Cash Flows Reporting	'
	Cash Flows Reporting
	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events	'
	Subsequent Events
	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	'
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date." This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.
	Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_2

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Controlled Entities	'
	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	Date of incorporation	Attributable interest
			or formation
			(date of acquisition,
			if applicable)
	Auxillium Poland	Republic of Poland	11-Jul-11	100%
	Auxillium Alaska	The State of Alaska, U.S.A.	18-Aug-11	100%

Note_7_Income_Tax_Provision_Ta

Note 7 - Income Tax Provision (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Net deferred tax assets - Non-current	'
		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12
	Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	86,303		$	61,480
	Less valuation allowance		(86,303	)		(61,480	)
	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-
Reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows	'
		For the Year			For the Year
		Ended			Ended
		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12
	Federal statutory income tax rate		34	%		34	%
	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)
	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%

Note_1_Organization_and_Operat1

Note 1 - Organization and Operations (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Aug. 18, 2011	Jul. 11, 2011	Apr. 01, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'
Common stock shares purchased by new affiliate from previous affiliate	'	'	'10,000,000
Percent of outstanding shares represented by purchase by new affiliate from previous affiliate	'	'	80.50%
Purchase price of shares by new affiliate from previous affiliate	'	'	$400,700
Consulting fee paid to Selga Auto LLC per automobile sold	'	'	300
Purchase price of all shares in Auxillium Poland	'	953	'
Loss from disposal of the discontinued operations	$1,917	'	'

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_3

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Controlled entities (Details)	Dec. 31, 2013
Auxillium Poland	'
Attributable equity interest by Selga, Inc.	100.00%
Auxillium Alaska	'
Attributable equity interest by Selga, Inc.	100.00%
Auxillium Energy, Inc.	'
Attributable equity interest by Selga, Inc.	100.00%

Note_4_Oil_and_Gas_Properties_

Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Aug. 31, 2013	Aug. 31, 2012	Dec. 28, 2011	Aug. 31, 2011	Aug. 29, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Percent of Union's interest in leases purchased by Auxillium Alaska	'	'	'	'	'	'	100.00%
Purchase price of Union's leases	'	'	'	'	'	'	$95,295
Time period to purchase leases before expiration	'	'	'	'	'	'	'90 days
Payment amount due to State of Alaska according to agreement	'	'	'	'	'	'	24,000
Payment due date to State of Alaska	'	'	'	'	'	'	'2011-09-01
Net revenue interest in leases purchased from Union	'	'	'	'	'	'	81.25%
Overriding royalty interest retained by Union	'	'	'	'	'	'	6.25%
Royalty interest paid to State of Alaska	'	'	'	'	'	'	12.50%
Payment made to the State of Alaska	'	'	28,000	28,800	'	24,000	'
Purchase payment made to Union	'	'	'	'	95,295	'	'
Impairment	0	'	'	'	'	'	'
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	$0	$0	'	'	'	'	'

Note_5_Related_Party_Transacti1

Note 5 - Related Party Transactions (Details Narrative) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		28 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'	'
Advance from CEO and principal shareholder	$42,632	$55,915	$24,466	$123,013
Repayments of advances	$0	$0	$0	'

Note_6_Stockholders_Deficit_De

Note 6 - Stockholders' Deficit (Details Narrative) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	2 Months Ended		12 Months Ended		28 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Aug. 31, 2010	Jun. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 21, 2012	Dec. 20, 2012	Apr. 01, 2011	Dec. 24, 2009	Nov. 09, 2009
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Forward stock split	'	'	'	'	'	'	10	'	'	'	'
Common stock, Issued	'	'	'	134,300,000	134,300,000	134,300,000	134,300,000	13,430,000	'	'	'
Common Stock, par value	'	'	'	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	'	'	$0.00
Common stock, Authorized	'	'	'	750,000,000	750,000,000	750,000,000	750,000,000	75,000,000	'	'	'
Common stock par value	'	'	'	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	'	'	$0.00
Shares issued for cash, instant	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	100,000,000	'
Shares issued for cash, duration	10,000,000	7,400,000	16,900,000	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Price per share of issued stock, instant	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$0.00	'
Price per share of issued stock, duration	$0.02	$0.00	$0.00	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total price for stock issued, instant	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$10,000	'
Total price for stock issued, duration	150,000	7,400	16,900	0	0	150,000	'	'	'	'	'
Debt forgiven and recorded as contributed capital	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$170	'	'

Note_7_Net_Deferred_Tax_Assets

Note 7 - Net Deferred Tax Assets - Non-Current (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Net deferred tax assets - Non-current:	'	'
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$86,303	$61,480
Less valuation allowance	-86,303	-61,480
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$0	$0

Note_7_Income_Tax_Provision_De

Note 7 - Income Tax Provision (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'
Federal statutory income tax rate	34.00%	34.00%
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards	-34.00%	-34.00%
Effective income tax rate	0.00%	0.00%

Note_7_Income_Tax_Provision_De1

Note 7 - Income Tax Provision (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'
Net operating loss ("NOL") carry-forwards	$253,834	'
Valuation allowance increase	$24,823	$27,873