Auxillium Energy (AXLM) 10-Q 14 Nov 14 2014 Q3 Quarterly report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Nov. 11, 2014
Document And Entity Information	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'Auxillium Energy Inc.	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001478132	'
Document Type	'10-Q	'
Document Period End Date	30-Sep-14	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--12-31	'
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	'No	'
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	'No	'
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	'Yes	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	134,300,000
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'Q3	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Current assets:	'	'
Cash	$0	$46
Total Current Assets	0	46
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method):	'	'
Unproved oil and gas property acreage	3,739	95,295
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method):	3,739	95,295
Total assets	3,739	95,341
Current liabilities:	'	'
Accrued expenses	8,598	41,692
Advances from stockholders	157,133	123,013
Total current liabilities	165,731	164,705
Total liabilities	165,731	164,705
Stockholders' equity (deficit):	'	'
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	0	0
Common stock at $0.001 par value: 750,000,000 shares authorized, 134,300,000 shares issued and outstanding	13,430	13,430
Additional paid-in capital	171,040	171,040
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage	-346,462	-253,834
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)	-161,992	-69,364
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$3,739	$95,341

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Preferred Stock	'	'
Preferred stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred stock, authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, issued	0	0
COMMON STOCK	'	'
Common Stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, Authorized	750,000,000	750,000,000
Common stock, Issued	134,300,000	134,300,000

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Loss) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Revenue	'	'	'	'
Revenue	$0	$0	$0	$0
Cost of revenues during the exploration stage:	'	'	'	'
State license fees	748	28,800	748	28,800
Gross margin	-748	-28,800	-748	-28,800
Operating expenses:	'	'	'	'
Professional fees	7,747	10,047	26,506	33,652
General and administrative expenses	181	155	579	1,314
Loss from abandonment of oil and gas properties	95,295	0	95,295	0
Total operating expenses	103,223	10,202	122,380	34,966
Loss from operations	-103,971	-39,002	-123,128	-63,766
Other (income) expense:	'	'	'	'
Forgiveness of accrued legal expenses	-30,500	0	-30,500	0
Other (income) expense, net	-30,500	0	-30,500	0
Loss before income tax provision	-73,471	-39,002	-92,628	-63,766
Income tax provision	0	0	0	0
Net loss	($73,471)	($39,002)	($92,628)	($63,766)
Net loss per common share	'	'	'	'
- Basic and diluted:	$ 0	$0	$0	$0
Weighted average common shares outstanding	'	'	'	'
- Basic and diluted	134,300,000	134,300,000	134,300,000	134,300,000

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:	'	'
Net loss	($92,628)	($63,766)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:	'	'
Loss from abandonment of oil and gas properties	95,295	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	'	'
Accrued expenses	-33,094	10,120
Net cash used in operating activities	-30,427	-53,646
Cash flows from investing activities:	'	'
Purchase of unproved oil and gas property acreage	-3,739	0
Net cash used in investing activities	-3,739	0
Cash flows from financing activities:	'	'
Advances from stockholders	34,120	53,649
Net cash provided by financing activities	34,120	53,649
Net change in cash	-46	3
Cash at beginning of period	46	97
Cash at end of period	0	100
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:	'	'
Interest paid	0	0
Income tax paid	$0	$0

Note_1_Organization_and_Operat

Note 1 - Organization and Operations	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 1 - Organization and Operations	'
	Note 1 – Organization and Operations
	Selga Inc.
	Selga Inc. (“Selga”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on November 9, 2009.
	Selga intended to export new and used cars from the United States to South America, Europe and Africa upon formation through August 29, 2011 (the date of discontinuance of auto export business).
	Change in Control and Scope of Business
	On March 31, 2011, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) by and among the Company’s then sole officer and director Olegs Petusko (“OP”), the Company and Warmond Fang (“WF”) was executed and a closing was held under the SPA.
	Pursuant to the SPA (i) WF purchased an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company (80.5% of the outstanding shares) from OP for a purchase price of $400,700; (ii) the Company disposed of its operating subsidiary by transferring its membership interest to OP;  (iii) WF and Jatinder S. Bhogal were elected directors of the Company; (iv) WF was elected President and CEO of the Company and Frank J. Hariton was elected secretary of the Company; and (v) OP resigned as an officer and director of the Company.   The Company entered into a six month consulting agreement with Selga Auto LLC, a company owned by OP to assist the Company in operating its business for a consulting fee of $300 per automobile sold which was terminated on July 11, 2011 with no automobiles being sold. With the change in control, management undertook efforts to identify additional commercial opportunities for the Company, and determined to investigate and commercially pursue the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties.
	Acquisition of Auxuillium Spółka Zograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością in Poland
	On July 11, 2011 a share sale agreement was entered into by and between Selga Inc. and House Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością. Under the terms of the share sale agreement, Selga purchased all of the shares of Auxillium Spółka zograniczoną odpowiedzialnością (“Auxillium Poland”), a Polish corporation for 2,653 Zlotys (approximately $953). Upon consummation of the share sale agreement, Auxillium Spółka zograniczoną odpowiedzialnością was established as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Selga Inc., and tasked with investigating oil and gas opportunities in Poland.
	Auxillium Poland is currently inactive.
	Formation of Auxillium Alaska, Inc.
	On August 18, 2011, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Auxillium Alaska Inc., registered and incorporated under the laws of the state of Alaska, to engage in oil and gas exploration activities in Alaska. Prior to August 29, 2011 (the date of acquisition of oil and gas properties), Auxillium Alaska Inc. is inactive.
	Discontinuance of Auto Export Business
	On August 29, 2011 the Company discontinued the business of exporting new and used cars from the United States to South America, Europe and Africa and now engages in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties. Loss from disposal of the discontinued operations amounted to $1,917.
	The consolidated financial statements have been presented to give retroactive effect to this discontinuance.
	Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
	On February 6, 2013, the “Company” filed Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, and changed its name from Selga Inc. to Auxillium Energy Inc. (“Auxillium Energy” or the “Company”).

Note_2_Significant_and_Critica

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices	'
	Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
	Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
	Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information
	The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014.
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:
	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
			(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	Auxillium Poland	Republic of Poland	11-Jul-11	100%
	Auxillium Alaska	The State of Alaska, U.S.A.	18-Aug-11	100%
	The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, Auxillium Poland, and Auxillium Alaska as of reporting period ending date(s) and for the reporting period(s) then ended.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
	Exploration Stage Company
	Although the Company started to investigate and commercially pursue the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties upon acquisition of oil and gas properties on August 29, 2011, a substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved establishing the business and the Company has neither started exploring the oil and gas properties, nor generated any revenue to date. Upon entry into the oil and gas exploration business the Company became an exploration stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. All activities since August 29, 2011 have been considered as part of the Company’s exploration stage activities.
	The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. Upon adoption, the Company no longer presents or discloses inception-to-date information and other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915.
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
	Oil and Gas Properties
	The Company follows Topic 932 “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Topic 932”) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its oil and gas properties and accounts for its oil and gas exploration and production activities using the successful efforts method. Under this method, all property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and development wells are capitalized when incurred, pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves. If an exploratory well does not find proved reserves, the costs of drilling the well are charged to expense and included within cash flows from investing activities in the statements of cash flows pursuant to Topic 932. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether productive or nonproductive. Oil and gas lease acquisition costs are also capitalized. Interest cost is capitalized as a component of property cost for significant exploration and development projects that require greater than six months to be readied for their intended use.
	Other exploration costs, including certain geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for oil and gas leases, are charged to expense as incurred. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate. A gain or loss is recognized for all other sales of proved properties and is classified in other operating revenues. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.
	Unevaluated properties are assessed periodically on a property-by-property basis and any impairment in value is charged to expense. If the unevaluated properties are subsequently determined to be productive, the related costs are transferred to proved oil and gas properties. Proceeds from sales of partial interests in unproved leases are accounted for as a recovery of cost without recognizing any gain until all costs are recovered.
	The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of oil and gas properties is calculated on a field-by-field basis using the unit-of-production method. Oil is converted to natural gas equivalents, Mcf, at the rate of one barrel to six Mcf. Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values.
	To date, the Company has no declared oil and gas reserves.
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amount due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
	Commitments and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
	The Company will derive revenue primarily from the sale of produced natural gas and crude oil. The Company reports revenue as the gross amount received before taking into account production taxes and transportation costs, which are reported as separate expenses. Revenue is recorded in the month the Company’s production is delivered to the purchaser, but payment is generally received between thirty (30) and ninety (90) days after the date of production. No revenue is recognized unless it is determined that title to the product has transferred to the purchaser. At the end of each month, the Company estimates the amount of production delivered to the purchaser and the price the Company will receive.
	Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision
	The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
	Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions
	The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.
Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control
Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.
There were no potentially outstanding dilutive shares for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 or 2013.
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.
The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.
The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations.
Finally, the amendments remove paragraph 810-10-15-16. Paragraph 810-10-15-16 states that a development stage entity does not meet the condition in paragraph 810-10-15-14(a) to be a variable interest entity if (1) the entity can demonstrate that the equity invested in the legal entity is sufficient to permit it to finance the activities that it is currently engaged in and (2) the entity’s governing documents and contractual arrangements allow additional equity investments.
The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage.
The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.
Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915.
In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).
In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.
When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):
	a.	Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:
	a.	Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note_3_Going_Concern

Note 3 - Going Concern	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 3 - Going Concern	'
	Note 3 – Going Concern
	The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).
	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	The Company is attempting to commence exploration and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence explorations and generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.
	The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note_4_Oil_and_Gas_Properties

Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties	'
	Note 4 – Oil and Gas Properties
	Purchase of Oil and Gas Properties in the State of Alaska on August 29, 2011
	On August 29, 2011 Auxillium Alaska Inc. entered into an agreement to acquire an oil and gas prospect in Alaska’s North Slope region from Union Energy (Alaska), LLC (the “Leases”). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to pay $95,295 to Union Energy (Alaska), LLC and $24,000 to the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources. Furthermore, pursuant to such agreement Union Energy (Alaska) LLC will deliver to Auxillium Alaska an 81.25% Net Revenue Interest in the Leases and retain a 6.25% overriding royalty interest on additional oil and gas leasehold acquired or purchased by Auxillium Alaska within the Prospect Area of Mutual Interest (“AMI”) with the remaining 12.5% as royalty interest to be paid to the State of Alaska. Auxillium Alaska and Union will be subject to the AMI relating to the Properties.
	On August 31, 2011 the Company paid $24,000 due to the State of Alaska and on December 28, 2011 the Company made the full payment of $95,295 owed to Union Energy (Alaska), LLC for the Leases pursuant to the agreement. With the balance of $95,295 paid to Union Energy (Alaska) LLC, there are no further payments or monies owed to Union Energy (Alaska) LLC and the Company has received assignment of the leases. Under the terms of the leases, there are oil and gas rental payments that the Company is required to pay to the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources annually to maintain the leases. The payments are due on September 1st of each year.
	On August 31, 2013 and 2012, Auxillium Alaska paid $28,800 due to the State of Alaska under their two (2) leases, respectively.
	On August 31, 2014, Auxillium Alaska surrendered the leases in its entirety to the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources. The total cost of $95,295 for the surrendered leases was recorded as loss from abandonment of oil and gas properties.
	Purchase of Oil and Gas Properties in the State of Alaska on September 11, 2014
	On April 28, 2014, Auxillium Alaska submitted to the State of Alaska a bid for an oil and gas lease (tract AP0802) for an estimated 880 acres in the Alaska Peninsula. Auxillium Alaska paid $900 to the State of Alaska for a 20% deposit of the total $4,400 bid.
	On September 11, 2014 the State of Alaska awarded the lease, which actually contained 748 acres. Auxillium Alaska paid the bid balance of 2,839 along with the first year annual rental payment of $748 for a total balance of $3,587 to the State of Alaska

Note_5_Related_Party_Transacti

Note 5 - Related Party Transactions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 5 - Related Party Transactions	'
	Note 5 – Related Party Transactions
	Advances from Stockholders
	From time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
	The chairman, CEO and a principal stockholder, Mr. Warmond Fang, advanced $123,013 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013.
	The chairman, CEO and a principal shareholder, Mr. Warmond Fang, advanced an additional $34,120 for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 bringing the total advance to $157,133.

Note_6_Stockholders_Deficit

Note 6 - Stockholders' Deficit	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 6 - Stockholders' Deficit	'
	Note 6 – Stockholders’ Deficit
	Shares Authorized
	Upon formation the total number of shares of common stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Seventy Five Million (75,000,000) shares, par value $.001 per share.
	Certificate of Change to the Certificate of Incorporation
	On December 21, 2012, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. The Certificate of Change effectuated a ten for one (10:1) forward stock split (the “Stock Split”) and certain other changes as set forth herein. As a result of the filing of the Certificate of Change, (i) each of the 13,430,000 issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, was changed to the ten (10) shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; (ii) the number of outstanding shares of common stock was increased from 13,430,000 to 134,300,000 shares; (iii) the par value of the Registrant’s common stock was changed from $0.001 per share to $0.0001 per share; and (iv) the number of shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to issue was increased from 75,000,000 shares to 750,000,000 shares.
	All shares and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the Stock Split.

Note_7_Subsequent_Events

Note 7 - Subsequent Events	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 7 - Subsequent Events	'
	Note 7 – Subsequent Events
	The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed.

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information	'
	Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information
	The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014.
Principles of Consolidation	'
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:
	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
			(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	Auxillium Poland	Republic of Poland	11-Jul-11	100%
	Auxillium Alaska	The State of Alaska, U.S.A.	18-Aug-11	100%
	The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, Auxillium Poland, and Auxillium Alaska as of reporting period ending date(s) and for the reporting period(s) then ended.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Exploration Stage Company	'
	Exploration Stage Company
	Although the Company started to investigate and commercially pursue the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties upon acquisition of oil and gas properties on August 29, 2011, a substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved establishing the business and the Company has neither started exploring the oil and gas properties, nor generated any revenue to date. Upon entry into the oil and gas exploration business the Company became an exploration stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. All activities since August 29, 2011 have been considered as part of the Company’s exploration stage activities.
	The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. Upon adoption, the Company no longer presents or discloses inception-to-date information and other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions	'
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	'
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	'
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.
Cash Equivalents	'
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Oil and Gas Properties	'
	Oil and Gas Properties
	The Company follows Topic 932 “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Topic 932”) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its oil and gas properties and accounts for its oil and gas exploration and production activities using the successful efforts method. Under this method, all property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and development wells are capitalized when incurred, pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves. If an exploratory well does not find proved reserves, the costs of drilling the well are charged to expense and included within cash flows from investing activities in the statements of cash flows pursuant to Topic 932. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether productive or nonproductive. Oil and gas lease acquisition costs are also capitalized. Interest cost is capitalized as a component of property cost for significant exploration and development projects that require greater than six months to be readied for their intended use.
	Other exploration costs, including certain geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for oil and gas leases, are charged to expense as incurred. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate. A gain or loss is recognized for all other sales of proved properties and is classified in other operating revenues. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.
	Unevaluated properties are assessed periodically on a property-by-property basis and any impairment in value is charged to expense. If the unevaluated properties are subsequently determined to be productive, the related costs are transferred to proved oil and gas properties. Proceeds from sales of partial interests in unproved leases are accounted for as a recovery of cost without recognizing any gain until all costs are recovered.
	The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of oil and gas properties is calculated on a field-by-field basis using the unit-of-production method. Oil is converted to natural gas equivalents, Mcf, at the rate of one barrel to six Mcf. Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values.
	To date, the Company has no declared oil and gas reserves.
Related Parties	'
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amount due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitments and Contingencies	'
	Commitments and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.
Revenue Recognition	'
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
	The Company will derive revenue primarily from the sale of produced natural gas and crude oil. The Company reports revenue as the gross amount received before taking into account production taxes and transportation costs, which are reported as separate expenses. Revenue is recorded in the month the Company’s production is delivered to the purchaser, but payment is generally received between thirty (30) and ninety (90) days after the date of production. No revenue is recognized unless it is determined that title to the product has transferred to the purchaser. At the end of each month, the Company estimates the amount of production delivered to the purchaser and the price the Company will receive.
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision	'
	Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision
	The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
	Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions
	The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.
	Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control
	Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.
Earnings per Share	'
	Earnings per Share
	Earnings per share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.
	There were no potentially outstanding dilutive shares for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 or 2013.
Cash Flows Reporting	'
	Cash Flows Reporting
	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events	'
	Subsequent Events
	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	'
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.
	The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.
	The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations.
	Finally, the amendments remove paragraph 810-10-15-16. Paragraph 810-10-15-16 states that a development stage entity does not meet the condition in paragraph 810-10-15-14(a) to be a variable interest entity if (1) the entity can demonstrate that the equity invested in the legal entity is sufficient to permit it to finance the activities that it is currently engaged in and (2) the entity’s governing documents and contractual arrangements allow additional equity investments.
	The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage.
	The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.
	Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915.
	In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).
	In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.
	When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):
		a.	Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)
		b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
		c.	Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:
		a.	Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
		b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
		c.	Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.
	Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_1

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Controlled Entities	'
	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	Date of incorporation	Attributable interest
			or formation
			(date of acquisition,
			if applicable)
	Auxillium Poland	Republic of Poland	11-Jul-11	100%
	Auxillium Alaska	The State of Alaska, U.S.A.	18-Aug-11	100%

Note_7_Income_Tax_Provision_Ta

Note 7 - Income Tax Provision (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Net deferred tax assets - Non-current	'
		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12
	Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	86,303		$	61,480
	Less valuation allowance		(86,303	)		(61,480	)
	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-
Reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows	'
		For the Year			For the Year
		Ended			Ended
		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12
	Federal statutory income tax rate		34	%		34	%
	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)
	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%

Note_1_Organization_and_Operat1

Note 1 - Organization and Operations (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Aug. 31, 2014	Aug. 18, 2011	Jul. 11, 2011	Apr. 01, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'	'
Common stock shares purchased by new affiliate from previous affiliate	'	'	'	10,000,000
Percent of outstanding shares represented by purchase by new affiliate from previous affiliate	'	'	'	80.50%
Purchase price of shares by new affiliate from previous affiliate	'	'	'	$400,700
Consulting fee paid to Selga Auto LLC per automobile sold	'	'	'	300
Purchase price of all shares in Auxillium Poland	'	'	953	'
Loss from disposal of the discontinued operations	$95,295	$1,917	'	'

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_2

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Controlled entities (Details)	Dec. 31, 2013
Auxillium Poland	'
Attributable equity interest by Selga, Inc.	100.00%
Auxillium Alaska	'
Attributable equity interest by Selga, Inc.	100.00%
Auxillium Energy, Inc.	'
Attributable equity interest by Selga, Inc.	100.00%

Note_4_Oil_and_Gas_Properties_

Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 11, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014	Apr. 28, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013	Aug. 31, 2012	Dec. 28, 2011	Aug. 31, 2011	Aug. 29, 2011	Aug. 18, 2011
	acre				acre
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Percent of Union's interest in leases purchased by Auxillium Alaska	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	100.00%	'
Purchase price of Union's leases	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$95,295	'
Time period to purchase leases before expiration	'	'90 days	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Payment amount due to State of Alaska according to agreement	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	24,000	'
Payment due date to State of Alaska	'	'2011-09-01	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Net revenue interest in leases purchased from Union	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	81.25%	'
Overriding royalty interest retained by Union	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	6.25%	'
Royalty interest paid to State of Alaska	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	12.50%	'
Payment made to the State of Alaska	'	'	'	'	'	28,000	28,800	'	24,000	'	'
Purchase payment made to Union	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	95,295	'	'	'
Payment #2 for oil and leasehold in Alaska, acres	'	'	'	'	880	'	'	'	'	'	'
Payment #2 amount due to State of Alaska according to agreement	'	'	'	'	4,400	'	'	'	'	'	'
Payment #2 due date to State of Alaska	'2014-06-30	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Payment #2 made to the State of Alaska	'	'	2,839	'	900	'	'	'	'	'	'
Payment #2 made to State of Alaska, deposit percent	'	'	'	'	20.00%	'	'	'	'	'	'
Payment #2 due to State of Alaska	'	'	'	'	3,587	'	'	'	'	'	'
First year rental payment paid to State of Alaska	'	'	748	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Loss from abandonment of Alaska oil and gas properties	'	'	'	$95,295	'	'	'	'	'	'	$1,917
Lease acreage awarded from Alaska	748	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'

Note_5_Related_Party_Transacti1

Note 5 - Related Party Transactions (Details Narrative) (USD $)	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'
Advance from CEO and principal shareholder, duration	$34,120	$53,649	$123,013
Advance from CEO and principal shareholder, instant	$157,133	'	$123,013

Note_6_Stockholders_Deficit_De

Note 6 - Stockholders' Deficit (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 21, 2012	Dec. 20, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'	'
Forward stock split	'	'	10	'
Common stock, Issued	134,300,000	134,300,000	134,300,000	13,430,000
Common Stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, Authorized	750,000,000	750,000,000	750,000,000	75,000,000
Common stock par value	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00