Fair Value Disclosures | 3 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2013 |
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | ' |
Fair Value Disclosures | ' |
NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES |
|
FASB ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and, (iv) willing to transact. |
|
FASB ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement costs). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, FASB ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. |
|
The fair value hierarchy is as follows: |
|
Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date, or convert to cash in the short term. |
|
Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (for example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
|
Level 3 Inputs - Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
|
A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. |
|
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. |
|
Available for Sale Securities – Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U. S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. |
|
Impaired Loans – Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 3 inputs based on internally customized discounting criteria. |
|
Loans Held for Sale – These loans are reported at the lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is determined based on expected proceeds based on sales contracts and commitments and are considered Level 2 inputs. |
|
Repossessed Assets – Fair values are valued at the time the loan is foreclosed upon and the asset is transferred from loans. The value is based upon primary third party appraisals, less costs to sell. The appraisals are generally discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business. Such discounts are typically significant and result in Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Repossessed assets are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on same or similar factors above. |
|
Loan Subject to Fair Value Hedge – The Company has one loan that is carried at fair value subject to a fair value hedge. Fair value is determined utilizing valuation models that consider the scheduled cash flows through anticipated maturity and is considered a Level 3 input. |
|
Derivative financial instruments – Fair values for interest rate swap agreements are based upon the amounts required to settle the contracts. These instruments are valued using Level 3 inputs utilizing valuation models that consider: (a) time value, (b) volatility factors and (c) current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Although the Company utilizes counterparties’ valuations to assess the reasonableness of its prices and valuation techniques, there is not sufficient corroborating market evidence to support classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 2. |
|
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
| | 30-Sep-13 | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total Fair | | | | | |
| | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Value | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government and agency | | $ | - | | | $ | 48,208 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 48,208 | | | | | |
Municipal obligations | | | - | | | | 81,314 | | | | - | | | | 81,314 | | | | | |
Corporate obligations | | | - | | | | 7,005 | | | | - | | | | 7,005 | | | | | |
Mortgage backed securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
government backed | | | - | | | | 26,199 | | | | - | | | | 26,199 | | | | | |
CMOs - government backed | | | - | | | | 39,106 | | | | - | | | | 39,106 | | | | | |
Loan subject to fair value hedge | | | - | | | | 11,161 | | | | - | | | | 11,161 | | | | | |
Loans held-for-sale | | | - | | | | 20,717 | | | | - | | | | 20,717 | | | | | |
Financial Liability: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | - | | | | 45 | | | | - | | | | 45 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 30-Jun-13 | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total Fair | | | | | |
| | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Value | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government and agency | | $ | - | | | $ | 50,931 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 50,931 | | | | | |
Municipal obligations | | | - | | | | 84,436 | | | | - | | | | 84,436 | | | | | |
Corporate obligations | | | - | | | | 9,061 | | | | - | | | | 9,061 | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
government backed | | | - | | | | 26,902 | | | | - | | | | 26,902 | | | | | |
Private lable CMOs | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | |
CMOs - government backed | | | - | | | | 47,633 | | | | - | | | | 47,633 | | | | | |
Loan subject to fair value hedge | | | - | | | | 11,306 | | | | - | | | | 11,306 | | | | | |
Loans held-for-sale | | | - | | | | 20,807 | | | | - | | | | 20,807 | | | | | |
Financial Liability: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | - | | | | 115 | | | | - | | | | 115 | | | | | |
|
|
The following tables presents, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the changes in loan subject to fair value hedges and the related derivative financial instrument that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. |
|
|
|
| | | | | Total Realized/ | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Unrealized Gains | | | Purchases, | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance | | | (Losses) Included | | | Sales, | | | Balance | | | | | |
| | as of | | | in Noninterest | | | Issuances, and | | | as of | | | | | |
| | 1-Jul-13 | | | Income | | | Settlements, net | | | 30-Sep-13 | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Financial Assets (Liability): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan subject to fair value hedge | | $ | 11,306 | | | $ | (61 | ) | | $ | (84 | ) | | $ | 11,161 | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | (115 | ) | | | 70 | | | | - | | | | (45 | ) | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | Total Realized/ | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Unrealized Gains | | | Purchases, | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance | | | (Losses) Included | | | Sales, | | | Balance | | | | | |
| | as of | | | in Noninterest | | | Issuances, and | | | as of | | | | | |
| | 1-Jul-12 | | | Income | | | Settlements, net | | | 30-Sep-12 | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Assets (Liability): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan subject to fair value hedge | | $ | 12,372 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | (85 | ) | | $ | 12,331 | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | (1,054 | ) | | | (7 | ) | | | - | | | | (1,061 | ) | | | | |
|
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). |
|
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value: |
|
|
| | 30-Sep-13 | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total Fair | | | | | |
| | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Value | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,251 | | | $ | 1,251 | | | | | |
Repossessed assets | | | - | | | | - | | | | 496 | | | | 496 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 30-Jun-13 | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total Fair | | | | | |
| | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Value | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,015 | | | $ | 2,015 | | | | | |
Repossessed assets | | | - | | | | - | | | | 550 | | | | 550 | | | | | |
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, certain impaired loans were remeasured and reported at fair value through a specific valuation allowance allocation of the allowance for possible loan losses based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral. Impaired loans with a carrying value of $1,285,000 were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling $34,000 to a total reported fair value of $1,251,000 based on collateral valuations utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs. |
|
|
Quantitative Information about Significant Unobservable Inputs Used in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements – The following table represents the Banks’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities, the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of those financial assets and liabilities, and the significant unobservable inputs and the ranges of values for those inputs: |
|
|
Instrument | | Fair Value at September 30, 2013 | | Principal Valuation Technique | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Range of Significant Input Values | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Dollars In Thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Appraisal of | Appraisal | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 1,251 | | collateral (1) | adjustments | | | 30-Oct | % | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Appraisal of | Liquidation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repossessed Assets | | $ | 496 | | collateral (1)(3) | expenses (2) | | | 30-Oct | % | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
(1) | Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various level 3 inputs which are not identifiable, less associated allowance. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2) | Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(3) | Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
FASB ASC Topic 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized in the statement of financial position, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Below is a table that summarizes the fair market values of all financial instruments of the Company at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, followed by methods and assumptions that were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of the classes of financial instruments. |
|
The estimated fair value amounts of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. |
|
| | 30-Sep-13 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Total | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Estimated | | | Carrying | |
| | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Fair Value | | | Amount | |
Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 7,126 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 7,126 | | | $ | 7,126 | |
FHLB stock | | | 1,914 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,914 | | | | 1,914 | |
Loans receivable, net | | | - | | | | - | | | | 238,199 | | | | 238,199 | | | | 233,345 | |
Accrued interest on dividends receivable | | | 2,339 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,339 | | | | 2,339 | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,463 | | | | 4,463 | | | | 3,420 | |
Cash surrender value of life insurance | | | 10,953 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 10,953 | | | | 10,953 | |
Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-maturing interest bearing deposits | | | - | | | | - | | | | 209,470 | | | | 209,470 | | | | 209,470 | |
Non-interest bearing deposits | | | 62,533 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 62,533 | | | | 62,533 | |
Time certificates of deposit | | | - | | | | - | | | | 157,058 | | | | 157,058 | | | | 156,277 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 3,761 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,761 | | | | 3,761 | |
Advances from the FHLB & other borrowings | | | - | | | | - | | | | 29,001 | | | | 29,001 | | | | 28,466 | |
Subordinated debentures | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,858 | | | | 3,858 | | | | 5,155 | |
Off-balance-sheet instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forward loan sales commitments | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commitments to extend credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Rate lock commitments | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
|
|
| | 30-Jun-13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Total | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Estimated | | | Carrying | |
(Dollars in Thousands) | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Fair Value | | | Amount | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 6,161 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 6,161 | | | $ | 6,161 | |
FHLB stock | | | 1,931 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,931 | | | | 1,931 | |
Loans receivable, net | | | - | | | | - | | | | 219,894 | | | | 219,894 | | | | 214,677 | |
Accrued interest on dividends receivable | | | 2,387 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,387 | | | | 2,387 | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,589 | | | | 3,589 | | | | 3,192 | |
Cash surrender value of life insurance | | | 10,869 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 10,869 | | | | 10,869 | |
Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest bearing deposits | | | - | | | | - | | | | 207,288 | | | | 207,288 | | | | 207,288 | |
Non-interest bearing deposits | | | 52,972 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 52,972 | | | | 52,972 | |
Time certificates of deposit | | | - | | | | - | | | | 158,452 | | | | 158,452 | | | | 157,491 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 3,535 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,535 | | | | 3,535 | |
Advances from the FHLB & other borrowings | | | - | | | | - | | | | 35,611 | | | | 35,611 | | | | 34,861 | |
Subordinated debentures | | | | | | | | | | | 3,860 | | | | 3,860 | | | | 5,155 | |
Off-balance-sheet instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forward loan sales commitments | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commitments to extend credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Rate lock commitments | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of the following classes of financial instruments. However, the 2013 Form 10-K provides additional description of valuation methodologies used in estimating fair value of these financial instruments. |
|
Cash, interest-bearing accounts, accrued interest and dividend receivable, and accrued expenses and other liabilities – The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization. |
|
Stock in the FHLB – The fair value of stock in the FHLB approximates redemption value. |
|
Loans receivable – Fair values are estimated by stratifying the loan portfolio into groups of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as real estate, commercial, and consumer, with each category further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms. For mortgage loans, the Company uses the secondary market rates in effect for loans that have similar characteristics. The fair value of other fixed rate loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the anticipated maturities adjusted for prepayment estimates. Adjustable interest rate loans are assumed to approximate fair value because they generally reprice within the short term. |
|
Fair values are adjusted for credit risk based on assessment of risk identified with specific loans, and risk adjustments on the remaining portfolio based on credit loss experience. |
|
Assumptions regarding credit risk are judgmentally determined using specific borrower information, internal credit quality analysis, and historical information on segmented loan categories for non-specific borrowers. |
|
Mortgage servicing rights – The fair value of servicing rights was determined using discount rates ranging from 9.0% to 20.0%, prepayment speeds ranging from 140% to 324% PSA, depending on stratification of the specific right. The fair value was also adjusted for the effect of potential past dues and foreclosures. |
|
Deposits and time certificates of deposit – The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as checking, passbook, and money market, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of time certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar maturities. |
|
Advances from the FHLB & Subordinated Debentures – The fair value of the Company’s advances and debentures are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the interest rate that would be effective September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively if the borrowings repriced according to their stated terms. |
|
Off-balance-sheet instruments - Fair values for off-balance-sheet, credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair values of these financial instruments are considered insignificant. Additionally, those financial instruments have no carrying value. |