JOINDER AGREEMENT
This Joinder Agreement dated as of ____________________, 2007 is by and among RNK, Inc., a Massachusetts- corporation, and RNK VA, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“RNK”) (collectively, the“Companies” and each a“Company”), Greystone Business Credit II, L.L.C., as Lender, Wave2Wave Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation(“Borrower Representative”) Wave2Wave VolP Conamimications, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Wave2Wave Data Communications, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Wave2Wave Communications Mid-West Region, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
WHEREAS, Borrower Representative and the Wilmington Trust Company and George Jeff Mennen as co-trustees U/A/D November 25, 1970, as amended for the benefit of John Henry Mennen (the“Mennen Trust” and collectively with Borrower Representative,“Borrowers” and each a“Borrower”), and Lender have entered into a Loan Agreement dated as of October 2007 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the“Loan Agreement”);
WHEREAS, each of Wave2Wave VoIP Communications, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Wave2Wave Data Communications, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Wave2Waire Communications Mid-West Region, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, have executed and. delivered the Subsidiary Guaranty to guaranty all of the obligations of Borrowers under the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents, executed and delivered the Subsidiary Security Agreement to secure each of their obligations under the Subsidiary Guaranty and documents related thereto and executed and delivered the Seller Subordination Agreement to provide for the subordination of certain indebtedness to the Obligations; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, Borrower Representative has asserted that the final Regulatory Approval has been obtained and Borrower Representative acknowledges that it is a condition under the Loan Agreement that each of the Companies join the Subsidiary Guaranty, the Subsidiary Security Agreement and the Seller Subordination Agreement as parties thereto;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
Section 1.Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Joinder Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Loan Agreement or, if not defined therein, in the Security Agreement.
Section 2.Joinder. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Joinder Agreement, each Companyishereby joined to the Subsidiary Guaranty, the Subsidiary Security Agreement and the Seller Subordination-Agreement, and each Company hereby agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions (including without limitation all of the representations and Warranties and covenants, as qualified by the attached schedules referred to below) of each Loan Document to which a Guarantor (as such term is defined in the Subsidiary Guaranty), Grantor (as such term is defined in the Subsidiary Security Agreement) or a Loan. Party (as such term is defined in the Seller Subordination Agreement) is a party, including without limitation the Subsidiary Guaranty, the Subsidiary Security Agreement and the Seller Subordination Agreement, as a Guarantor, a Grantor or a Loan Party as applicable, in each case as if such Company were a direct signatory thereto. In furtherance of the preceding sentence, without limiting any provision of any Loan Document to which each Company is now becoming a party and in accordance with the-terms of the Loan Documents, each Company acknowledges that it is an Obligor and agrees to be jointly and severally “liable with the Borrowers and all other Obligors for the Obligations, whether currently or hereafter outstanding.
Section 3.Grant of Security Interest. TO secure the full payment and performance of the Guarantied Obligations, each Company hereby assigns to Lender and grants to Lender a continuing security interest in the following .property of such Company, whether tangible or intangible, now or hereafter owned, existing, acquired or arising and wherever now or hereafter located (all being collectively referred to herein as the“Collateral”):
(a) all Accounts and all Goods whose sale, lease or other disposition by such Company has given rise to Accounts and have been returned to, or repossessed or stopped in transit by, such Company;
(b) all Chattel Paper, Instruments, Documents and General Intangibles (including all patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, trade names, trade secrets, goodwill; copyrights, copyright applications, registrations, licenses, software, franchises, customer lists, tax refund claims, claims against carriers and shippers, guarantee claims, contracts rights, payment intangibles, security interests, security deposits and rightstOindemnification);
(c) all Inventory;
(d) all Goods (other than Inventory), including Equipment, vehicles and Fixtures;
(e) all Investment Property; . all Deposit
Accounts, bank accounts, deposits and cash;
(g)”’ all Letter-of-Credit Rights;
(h) all Commercial Tort Claims listed in Section 14 of Schedule A;
(i) all Supporting Obligations;
(j) any other property of any Company now or hereafter in the possession, custody or control of Lender or any agent or any parent, Affiliate or Subsidiary of Lender or any participant with any Lender in the Loans, for any purpose (whether for safekeeping, deposit, collection, custody, pledge, transmission or otherwise); and
(lc) all additions and accessions to, substitutions for, and replacements, products and Proceeds of the foregoing property, including proceeds of all insurance policies insuring the foregoing property, and all of such company’s books and records relating to any of.the foregoing and to such Corapany’S business. • ’
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 3, the types or items of Collateral of Companies shall not include (i) any rights or interest in any contract, license, or license agreement that is now or hereafter held by any Company but only-to the extent that such item contains a term or is subject to a rule of law, statute or regulation that restricts, prohibits, or, requires a consent (that has not been obtained) of a Person (other than an Obligor) to, the creation, attachment or perfection of the security interest granted herein, and any such restriction, prohibition and/or requirement of consent is effective and enforceableunderapplicable law and is not rendered ineffective by applicable law (including, without limitation, pursuant to Sections 9-406, 9-407, 9-408 or 9-409 of the UCC) (provided, however, that (A) the provisions of this clause (i) shall not include, any Proceeds of any such item and (B) any such item that at any time ceases to satisfy the criteria of this clause (i) (whether as a result of obtaining any necessary consent, any change in any rule of law, statute or regulation, or otherwise), shall be Collateral hereunder), and (ii) any equipment or other property now existing or hereafter- acquired- in-accordance with clause (1) of the definition of Permitted Liens in the Loan Agreement and which is subject to a lease
-2-
or other financing arrangement, the terms of which prohibit the granting of a lien or security interest in such property.
Section 4.Effectiveness. This Joinder Agreement shall be effective upon the execution and delivery hereof by the parties hereto.
Section 5.Representations and Warranties. Each Company represents and warrants to Lender that after giving effect to the consummation of this Joinder Agreement (i) each of the representations and warranties of each Company set forth in the Subsidiary Guaranty, the. Subsidiary Security Agreement, the Seller Subordination Agreement and the other Loan Documents are true, correct and complete in all material respects as of the date here,64 and (ii) no Default or Event of Default has •occurred and is continuing. After the execution and delivery by each Company Of this Joinder Agreement, each Company shall be deemed to have made, the representations and warranties as a Guarantor, a Grantor or a Loan Party, as applicable, at the times required by thetean Document.
Section 6.Schedules to Security Agreement. To make the schedules to the Subsidiary Security Agreement true, correct and complete, each Grantor and each Company hereby agree that the schedules to the Subsidiary Security Agreement are each hereby supplemented as set forth on the correspondingly numbered schedules attached hereto.
Section 7.Scope. Except as expressly modified by this Joinder Agreement, the Subsidiary Guaranty, the Subsidiary Security Agreement, the Seller Subordination Agreement and all of the other Loan Documents shall remain in full force and effect as executed.
Section 8.Governing Law. THIS JOINDER AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS PRINCIPLES.
Section 9.Counterparts; Electronic Signatures. This Joinder Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and bythedifferent parties hereto on separate counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Joinder Agreement. Receipt by telecopy or electronic portable format (pdf)of any executed signature page to this Joinder Agreement shall constitute effective delivery of such signature page.
[signature page follows]
-3-
- IN WITNESSWHEREOF; this Joinder Atteement haS bedn duirexeCtited as of the date -first above written.
| | | | |
| RNK, INC., a Massachusetts corporation |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| | | | |
| RNKVA, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| | | | |
| WAVE2WAVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., as Borrower Representative |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| | | | |
| WAVE2WAVE VOIP COMMUNICATIONS, LLC |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| | | | |
| WAVEZWAVE DATA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| | | | |
| WAVE2WAVE COMMUNICATIONS MIDWEST REGION, LLC |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| | | | |
| GREYSTONE BUSINESS CREDIT II, L.L.C., as Lender |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
SCHEDULES
9. Information:
(a) Prior Names of each Grantor:
(i) RNK, Inc.
None.
(ii) RNK VA, LLC
None.
(b) Prior Trade Names of each Grantor:
(i) RNK, Inc.
None.
(ii) RNK VA, LLC
None.
(c) Exitting Trade Names of each Grantor:
(i) RNK, Inc.
RNK Communications
RNK Telecom
RNK VoIP
RNK Prepaid
RNK Connect
RNK Carrier
Half-Priced Telecom
Phone Number BankDial
aroundtheworld.com
RNK VA, LLC
None.
(d) Chief Ettentive Office of each Grantor:
(i) RNK, Inc.
333 Elm St., Suite 310, Dedham, MA
RNK. VA, LLC
333 Elm St., Suite 310, Dedham, MA
(e) Other Locations:
(i) RNK,
Leased Facilities
175 The Great Road
Bedford, MA 01730
333 Elm St.
Dedham, MA 02026 •
Co-Location Facilities
60 Page St. •
Bedford, MA 01730
300 Carpenter St.
Providence, RI 02909
1 Sundial Ave.
Manchester, NH 03103
60 Hudson St.:
New York, NY 10013
50 NE 9th Street.
Miami, FL 33132
165 Halsey St.
Newark, NJ 07102
(ii) RNK VA, LLC
None.
(i) Inventory Locations
(i) RNK, Inc.
None.
(ii) RNK VA, LLC
None.
(ii) Other Locations
(i) RNK, Inc.
None.
(ii) RNK. VA, LLC
None.
(1) Litigation:
(i) RNK,
| | |
1. | Jane Doe v. RNK. Inc. d/b/a RNK Telecom. Civil Action No, 05-CIV-2602 (SCR)(LMS1 (SONY). |
| | |
| a. | On March 7, 2005, Jane Doe, a minor and resident of the State of New York, commenced a civil action against RNK, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, White Plains Division. |
| | |
| b. | Jane Doe asserts that RNK was negligent in failing to comply with certain orders of the New York Public Service Commission and accordingly is liable to her for any and all damages resulting from such violations. |
| | |
| c. | The federal court’s jurisdiction over this.matter is based on diversity jurisdiction, meaning the parties are citizens of different states and the matter in controversy exceeds the threshold amount of $75,000. No specific amount of damages, however, was alleged by the plaintiff in the Complaint. |
| | |
| d. | Chubb’ Insurance has assumed coverage for the defense of this dispute under RNK’s general umbrella insurance policy and has retained defense counsel, Cheryl Heller, Esq. of Ward, Norris, Heller & Reidy, L.L.P. in Rochester, New York to defend RNK. The insurance policy has a limit of $2,000,000 with a $10,000 deductible. |
| | |
| e. | The plaintiff has indicated no objectives other than the recovery of monetary damages. |
| | |
| f. | As of April 30, 2007, discovery had finished, with both parties exchanging information pursuant to agreed upon and required deadlines, and depositions were taken by both sides. |
| | |
| g. | The parties have agreed to mediation on October 9, 2007 in an attempt to settle all dispetes. |
| | |
2. | Farmers Insurance v RNK and Ripple Communications |
| | |
| a. | On March 13, 2007, Farmers Insurance filed a Declaratory Judgment complaint against RNK and Ripple Communications, Inc. in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Docket No. 07 CA 10494 JLT,Farmers Insurance Exchange vs, Ripple Communications Inc and RNK Inc d/b/a RNK Telecom. Farmers is seeking declaratory judgment against RNK that Farmers has no duty to indemnify RNIC if damages are awarded |
| | |
| | in the ongoing United States District Court of Southern District of New York action,. JaneDoe et. Al. vs. RNK Inc d//b/a RNK Telecom(Docket No. 05 CW 2602 (SCR) (LMS)). RNK’s insurance company, CHUBB Group of Insurance Companies, requested that Ripple Communications Inc. indemnify RNK for attorney fees and any damages that may be awarded in the on going Jane Doe dispute: CHUBB contends that the Jane Doe action is due to the conduct and/or negligence of Ripple Communications, a company that contracted with RNK to provide telecommunication services. CHUBS sought to enforce the indemnification language in the.contract between RNK and Ripple. Ripple’sinsurer,Farmers Insurance, declined to indenuiify RNK, and has filed this Declaratory Judgment action. |
| | |
| b. | On September 12, 2007, the parties attended a scheduling conference and agreed to stay the proceeding until November 30, 2007 to allow for the completion of the mediation in the-underlying matter, Jane Doe v. RNK Inc., scheduled for October, 9, 2007. |
| | |
3. | Bedford, Massachusetts Lease Dispute |
| | |
| a. | On or about March 14, 2006, RNK staffreceived notice from Elie Jarnrnal, General Manager of Bedford 175 Great Road, LLC, (“Landlord”), which owns a building rented by RNK at 175 The Great Road, Bedford, Massachusetts, and at which RNK maintains its critical network facilities, that commencing March 1, 2006, RNK would be billed annually for property insurance and other costs associated with the building. RNK had signed a lease extension, via amendment of the existing lease, with the Landlord on November 29, 2005 with an initial term of four years. starting on March 1, 2006, and ending February 28; 2010, with options for two additional terms of three years each. With the receipt of this notice, RNK realized that it was being charged too much for expenses as defined in the lease. Asaresult, RNK attempted to resolve the issue informally with the Landlord, but the Landlord was not interested, and informed RNK that he believed the parties had changed the specific language within the underlying lease covering expenses by including the term “triple-net” as a suffix to the per-square foot pricing term in the amendment. The Landlord then sent RNK notice of default. At that time, on the advice of counsel, RNK determined it would be best to pay the additionalrentunder protest, and reserving all rights, giving RNK the ability to file suit for the additional rent at any time. RNK continues to pay its rent and additional expenses on time each month under protest, has had no additional unresolved disputes with the landlord, enjoys an otherwise stable business relationship with the Landlord, and does not intend to address the issue unless RNK determines it wishes to move from its Bedford location. |
| | |
4. | Vonage/Verizon Patent Dispute - |
| | |
| a. | RNK has examined the Verizon vs. Vonagepatent dispute for its relevance to - RNK, and believes that due to the technical manner in which RNK has set up its VoIP service, which differs materially•from Vonage’s system, RNK is not at major risk for a similar patent infringement suit from Verizon. In addition, due to the relatively small size of RNK’s VofP program as compared to Vonage’s, RNK believes it is less likely that Verizon would see RNK as worthy of a litigation effort. |
| | |
5. | New Hampshire Numbering Review |
| | |
| a. | On November 9, 2006, in its long-running docket regarding the deployment by.carriers of, and compensation for, so-called “Virtual NXX” (VNXX) calls, the New Hampshire PUC staff issued a memorandum recommending to the CommiSsion investigate certain uses of numbering resources by New Hampshire carriers, including Level 3 |
| | |
| | Communications, Global NAPs, Paetee, and RNK. Specifically, the memorandum indicates there might be evidence that the carriers are using numbering resources for interstate toll bypass, and recommended an investigation by the ‘Commission into such usage. Further, the memorandum requested that the Commission implement its orders regarding the permissive use of VNXX, or, alternatively, ban theuseof VNXX services, completely deregulate them, or consider limiting them exclusively for the purposes of provisioning dial-up access to the internet. |
| | |
| b. | As of August 31, 2007, however, there is no evidence that the NH PUC intends to expend additional resources to examine this issue, and furtherniore, has riot taken any action in this docket whatsoever since January 2006. Further, RNK notes the recent departure of key staff person, Katy Mulholand, Assistant Director.of the Telecommunications Division, which has likely hampered the PUC’s ability to handle additional work, especially complex dockets. |
| | |
6. | 7-11 Dispute |
| | |
| a. | RNK and 7-Eleven, Inc. (“7-11”) entered into a Marketing Development Fund Agreement (the “MDP”), dated January 5, 2007 whereby the Parties agreed to share certain marketing costs associated with the marketing of RNK products in 7-11 stores. Pursuant to Section 2(c) of the MDF, 7-Eleven was to submit to RNK its marketing plan for each period of the marketing campaign (with section 1 of the Agreement also specifically requiring that 7-11 submit the actual timeframe and details of the marketing campaign), which plans had to be approved by RNK prior to the commencement of the relevant period. Under section 4 of the Agreement, approval for such projects could only be granted in writing in advance by RNK. 7-11 seeks reimbursement for costs which RNK disputes because no plans or campaigns were submitted to, or approved by, RNK in the manner set forth inthe Agreement. RNK also disputes these claims on the grounds that all invoices were submitted well after the contractual bar for submission of invokes. Total disputed amounts equal $300,000. |
| | |
| b. | The Parties are in negotiations to settle the matter amicably. RNK expects the matter to settle for some amount less than the’disputed amount. |
| | |
7. | Sprint/Vonage Patent Dispute |
| | |
| a. | RNK is currently conducting an examination of the recent Sprint vs. Vonage patent dispute for its relevance to RNK. After a preliminary investigation, RNK predicts that if these patents remain valid upon•appoal they may encompass a substantial amount Of the:Voil). industry. The claims. involVed appear very broad in nature, which rnayindicate the possibility that the appeals court would narrow the claims’ scope or invalidate them. The breadth of these patents may be a strong incentive for the industry to seek their invalidation. In addition, due to the relatively small size of RNK’s VollY program as compared to Vonage’s there is likely the additional reality that Sprint would not see RNK as worthy of a litigation effort. |
(ii) RNK VA, LLC
None.
(j) Taxes
| |
| (I) RNK, Inc. |
|
| None. |
|
| (ii) RNK VA, LLC |
|
| None. |
(k) Existing Debt
(i) RNK, Inc.
| |
| Citizens Bank Irrevocable Transferable Standby Letter of Credit with RNK, Inc. as applicant in the amount of $90,000 with NS Norfolk Acquisition LLC as beneficiary. Expiration: June 15, 2008 |
| |
| Sovereign Bank Irrevocable Transferable Standby Letter of Credit with RNK, Inc. as applicant in the amount of $40,000 with Verizon, Inc. as beneficiary. Expiration: September 15, 2008 Sovereign Bank IrreVocable Transferable Standby Letter of Credit with RNK, Inc. as applicant in the amount of $20,000 with Verizon, Inc. as beneficiary. Expiration: September 15, 2008 Sovereign Bank Irrevocable Transferable Standby Letter of Credit with RNK, Inc. as applicant in the amount of $40,000 with Verizon, Inc. as beneficiary. Expiration: September 15, 2008 |
| |
| Sovereign Bank Irrevocable Transferable Standby Letter of Credit with RNK Holding Company. as applicant in the amount of $50,000 with Acstar Insurance Company as beneficiary. Expiration: June 26, 2008 |
| |
| (ii) RNK VA, LLC |
| |
| None. |
| |
| (1) Existing Liens |
| |
| (i) RNK, Inc. |
| |
| RNK, Inc. Cash Collateral Account Number 63900064393 at- Sovereign Bank, containing no 0 more than $150,000 securing those letters of credit described in Section (k)(i) above. |
| |
| (ii) RNK VA, LLC |
| |
| None. |
| |
| 10. Description of Real Property: |
| |
| (i) RNK, Inc. |
None.
(ii) RNK VA, LLC
None.
12. • Other Covenants: Grantors shall promptly provide Lender with copies of any material communication delivered in connection with any material agreement or contract (including, without limitation, any material distribution agreement).
14. Coinmercial Tort Claims
(1) RNK, Inc.
None.
(ii) RNK VA, LLC
None.
15. Deposit Accounts
| | | |
Bank | | | Aceount Number |
|
|
|
Sovereign | | | 60600020030 |
Sovereign | | | 63904953971 |
Sovereign | | | 63900064393 |
Sovereign | | | 63904953989 |
Sovereign | | | 63904954003 |
Sovereign | | | 63904953997 |
Sovereign | | | 63904956909 |
Sovereign | | | 75860032277- |
TRADEMARK. SECURITY AGREEMENT
This TRADEMARK SECURITY AGREEMENT (as amended, amended. and restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Trademark Security Agreement”) is made this day of , 2007, by RNK, INC., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Assignor”), in favor of GREYSTONE BUSINESS CREDIT II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (the “Lender”).
WITNES SETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated as of October [1, 2007 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Loan and Security Agreement”) among Wave2Wa.ve Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), an affiliate of Borrower and Lender, Lender-is willing to make certain financial accommodations available to the Borrower and its affiliate pursuant to the terms and conditions thereof;
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Corporate Guaranty of even date herewith (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Guaranty”) by Assignor and certain affiliates of Assignor in favor of Lender, Assignor has agreed to guaranty the Borrower’s obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement;
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Security Agreement of even date herewith (as amended, restated, .supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Security Agreement”) by Assignor and certain affiliates of Assignor in favor of Lender, Assignor has granted a lien on its assets in favor of Lender to secure its obligations under the Guaranty; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Security Agreement, Assignor is required to execute and deliver to Lender this Trademark Security Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby agrees as follows:
1.DEFINED TERMS. All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Loan and Security Agreement.
2.GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN TRADEMARK COLLATERAL. To secure the full payment and performance of all of the Obligations, Assignor hereby grants to Lender a continuing first priority security interest in all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in, to and under the following, whether presently existing or hereafter created or acquired (collectively, the “Trademark Collateral”):
(a) (i) all of its trademarks, trade names, registered trademarks, trademark applications, service marks, registered service marks and service mark applications,
throughout the world and (A) all renewals thereof, (B) all income, royalties,. damages and payments now and hereafter due and/or payable under and with respect thereto, including, without limitation, payments under all licenses entered into in connection thereWith and damages and payments for past or future infringements or dilutions thereof, (C) the right to sue for past, present and future infringements and dilutions thereof, (D) the goodwill of Assignor’s business symbolized by the foregoing and connected therewith, and (E) all of Assignor’s rights corresponding thereto (the “Trademarks”), including, without limitation, those Trademarks. filed with-the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as set forth onSchedule A hereto, and (ii) any rights under or interest in any Trademark, and the right to-use the foregoing in connection with the enforcement of Lender’s rights under the Loan Documents, including, without limitation, the right to prepare for sale and sell any and all Inventory and Equipment now or hereafter owned by Assignor and now or hereafter covered by such licenses (the “Trademark Licenses”) to which it is a party, includingthose referred to onSchedule A hereto;
(b) all reissues, continuations or extensions of the foregoing;
(c) all goodwill of the business connected with the use of; and symbolized by, each Trademark and each Trademark licensed under any Trademark License; and
(d) all products and proceeds of the foregoing, including, without limitation, any claim by Assignor against third parties for past, present or future (i) infringement or dilution of any Trademark or any Trademark licensed under any Trademark License or (ii) injury to the goodwill associated with any Trademark oranyTrademark licensed under any Trademark License.
3.SECURITY AGREEMENTS The security interests granted pursuant to this Trademark Security Agreement are granted in conjunction with the security interests granted to Lender by Assignor pursuant to the Security Agreement. Assignor hereby acknowledges and affirms that the rights and remedies of Lender with respect to the security interest in the Trademark Collateral made and granted hereby are more fully set forth in the Security Agreement, the terms and provisions of each of which are incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein.
4.AUTHORIZATION TO SUPPLEMENT. If Assignor shall obtain rights to any new trademarks, the provisions. of this Trademark Security Agreement shall automatically apply thereto. Assignor shall give prompt notice in writing to Lender with respect to any such new trademarks or renewal or extension of any trademark registration. Without limiting Assignor’s obligations under thisSection 4, Assignor hereby. authorizes Lender unilaterally to modify this Trademark Security Agreement by amendingSchedule A to include any such new trademark rights of Assignor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure to so modify this Agreement or amendSchedule A shall in any way affect, invalidate or detract from Lender’s continuing security interest in all Collateral, whether or-not listed onSchedule A.
-2-
5.COUNTERPARTS. Thisiradenaark Security Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such separate counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. In proving this Trademark Security Agreement or any other Loan Document in any judicial proceedings, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart signed by the party against whom such enforcement is sought. Any signatures delivered by a party by facsimile transmission or by e-mail transmission shall be deemed an original signature hereto.
[Signature Page Follows}
-3-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor has caused this Trademark Security Agreement. to-be executed and.delivered by its duly authorized officer as of the date first set forth above.
| | | | |
| RNK, INC., |
| as Assignor |
| | | | |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| |
| ACCEPTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY: |
| |
| GREYSTONE BUSINESS CREDIT II, L.L.C., as Lender |
| |
| By: | |
| |
|
| Name: | |
| |
|
| Title: | |
| |
|
| |
Signature Page to Trademark Security Agreement
SCHEDULE A
- to
RNK. TRADEMARK SECURITY AGREEMENT
Trademark Registrations/Applications
| | | | | | | | | |
Assignor | | Country | | Mark | | Application/ Registration No. | | App/Reg Date | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
RNK, Inc. dba RNK Communications | | USA | | Phone Number Bank | | N/A• | | N/A | |
RNK, Inc. dba RNK Communications | | USA | | Phone Number Bank | | N/A | | N/A | |
RNK,Inc. | | USA | | Mytempnumber | | N/A | | N/A | |
RNK Inc. | | USA | | RNK Communications | | N/A | | N/A | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | RNK Communications | | N/A | | N/A | |
RNK Inc. | | USA | | Bridge2Voip | | 3174072 | | 11/21/2006 | |
RNK Inc. | | USA | | Revos | | 3171488 | | .11/14/2006 | |
RNK Inc. | | USA | | Voip2Go | | 3171467 | | . 11/14/2006 | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | Subjecttalk | | N/A | | N/A | |
RNK Inc. | | USA | | RNKvoip | | 3192154 | - | 1/2/2007 | |
RNK, Inc. dba RNK Telecom | | USA | | PVG | | 2628302 | | 10/1/2002 | |
RNK, Inc. dba RNK Telecom | | USA | | Hello PVG Personal Voice Greeting | | 2697484 | | 3/18/2003 | |
RNK, Inc. dba RNK Telecom | | USA | | HDC Tel | | 2674615 | | 1/14/2003 | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | Bucket of Minutes | | 2607069 | | 8/13/2002 | |
RNK, Inc | | USA | | RNK Telecom | | 2607068 | | 8/13/2002 | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | None (Design only) | | 2506948 | | 11/13/2001 | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | RNK Telecom | | 2607067. | | 8/13/2002 | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | Dialaroundtheworld.com | | 2480071 | | 8/21/2001 | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | RNK Telecom | | 57956 | | 10/5/1999 | |
RNK, Inc. | | USA | | HDC Tel | | 60961 . | | 12/13/2001 | |
Trade Names
| |
| RNK Telecom, Inc. |
| RNK Maryland, Inc. |
| RNKCommunications |
| RNK Communications, Inc. |
| RNK Telecom |
| RNKVoIP |
| Halfprice Telecom |
| Dialaroundtheworld.com |
| HDC Tel |
| 781-382-Talk.com |
Schedule A
| | |
| Supportforvoip.com | |
| SubjectTalk | |
| ConferenceCallingPro | |
| RNK VA LLC | Phone Number Bank |
| VoIP2Go | |
| Revos | |
| Bridge2VolP | |
| RNK Pennsylvania, Inc. | |
| RNK Michigan Inc. | |
Common Law Trademarks
None.
TrademarksNotCurrently IntJse
None.
Trademark Licenses
None.
-6-