Rental Property | Rental Property The following table summarizes the components of rental property as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands): September 30, December 31, Land $ 219,775 $ 191,238 Buildings, net of accumulated depreciation of $97,525 and $75,116, respectively 1,178,956 1,042,086 Tenant improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $25,525 and $20,943, respectively 23,439 22,619 Building and land improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $16,973 and $9,730, respectively 69,893 54,233 Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $189,937 and $146,026, respectively 264,115 247,904 Total rental property, net $ 1,756,178 $ 1,558,080 Acquisitions The following table summarizes the acquisitions of the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 : Location of property Square Feet Buildings Purchase Price (in thousands) Burlington, NJ (1) 503,490 1 $ 34,883 Greenville, SC 157,500 1 4,800 North Haven, CT 824,727 3 57,400 Three months ended March 31, 2015 1,485,717 5 $ 97,083 Plymouth, MI 125,214 1 6,000 Oakwood Village, OH 75,000 1 4,398 Stoughton, MA 250,213 2 10,675 Oklahoma City, OK 223,340 1 12,135 Clinton, TN (1) 166,000 1 5,000 Knoxville, TN 108,400 1 4,750 Fairborn, OH 258,680 1 9,100 El Paso, TX 126,456 1 9,700 Phoenix, AZ 102,747 1 9,500 Charlotte, NC 123,333 1 7,500 Machesney Park, IL 80,000 1 5,050 Three months ended June 30, 2015 1,639,383 12 $ 83,808 Macedonia, OH 201,519 1 12,192 Novi, MI 125,060 1 8,716 Grand Junction, CO 82,800 1 5,254 Tulsa, OK 175,000 1 13,000 Chattanooga, TN 646,200 3 21,160 Libertyville, IL (1) 287,102 2 11,121 Greer, SC 290,000 4 9,025 Piedmont, SC 400,000 3 12,000 Belvidere, IL 100,000 1 5,938 Conyers, GA 201,403 1 9,880 Three months ended September 30, 2015 2,509,084 18 $ 108,286 Nine months ended September 30, 2015 5,634,184 35 $ 289,177 (1) The Company also acquired a vacant land parcel adjacent to each of the buildings acquired. Subject to receipt of any required governmental permits, these vacant parcels may be used for building expansion or otherwise sold as developable parcels. The following table summarizes the allocation of the consideration paid at the date of acquisition during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 for the acquired assets and liabilities in connection with the acquisitions identified in the table above. Acquired assets and liabilities (dollars in thousands) Nine Months Ended Weighted Average Amortization Period (years) Intangibles Land $ 31,618 N/A Buildings 172,858 N/A Tenant improvements 5,449 N/A Building and land improvements 12,799 N/A Deferred leasing intangibles - In-place leases 40,011 5.9 Deferred leasing intangibles - Tenant relationships 21,736 8.2 Deferred leasing intangibles - Above market leases 7,159 8.5 Deferred leasing intangibles - Below market leases (2,600 ) 5.4 Above market assumed debt adjustment (418 ) 1.4 Other assets 565 N/A Total purchase price $ 289,177 Less: Mortgage notes assumed (22,343 ) N/A Net assets acquired $ 266,834 On January 22, 2015, the Company acquired a property located in Burlington, NJ for approximately $34.9 million . As consideration for the property acquired, the Company (i) granted 812,676 Other Common Units with a fair value of approximately $21.9 million , (ii) paid $1.2 million in cash, (iii) and assumed an $11.8 million mortgage note. The mortgage note was paid in full immediately subsequent to the acquisition. For a discussion of the method used to determine the fair value of the Other Common Units issued, see Note 7. On June 25, 2015, the Company assumed a mortgage note of approximately $4.9 million in connection with the acquisition of the property located in Charlotte, NC. On September 29, 2015, the Company assumed a mortgage note of approximately $5.7 million in connection with the acquisition of the property located in Conyers, GA. For a discussion of the method used to determine the fair value of the mortgage notes, see Note 4. The table below sets forth the results of operations for the properties acquired during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition: Results of operations (in thousands) Three months ended September 30, 2015 Nine months ended September 30, 2015 Revenue $ 5,712 $ 9,783 Property acquisition costs $ 882 $ 2,156 Net loss $ (288 ) $ (1,362 ) The following tables set forth pro forma information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. The below pro forma information does not represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the acquisitions outlined above occurred on the first day of the applicable reporting period, nor do they predict the results of operations of future periods. The pro forma information has not been adjusted for property sales. Nine months ended September 30, 2015 Pro Forma (in thousands) (1) Total revenue $ 171,476 Net loss $ (8,511 ) (2) Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (16,124 ) Nine months ended September 30, 2014 Pro Forma (in thousands) (3) Total revenue $ 160,083 Net loss $ (6,544 ) (2) Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (13,845 ) (1) The pro forma information for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is presented as if the acquisition of the properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 had occurred at January 1, 2014, the beginning of the reporting period prior to acquisition. (2) The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 excludes $2.2 million of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of properties that closed during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , and the net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was adjusted to include these acquisition costs. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 excludes $3.3 million of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of buildings that closed during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . (3) The pro forma information for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is presented as if the acquisition of the properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 had occurred at January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2013, respectively, the beginning of the reporting period prior to acquisition. Dispositions The following tables summarize the dispositions made by the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 (in millions, except for square feet and building count). All of the dispositions were accounted for under the full accrual method. Property Location Square Feet Buildings Carrying Value Sales Price Net Proceeds Gain (Loss) on Sale Hazelwood, MO 242,630 1 $ 4.4 $ 4.4 $ 4.3 $ (0.1 ) Round Rock, TX 79,180 1 3.1 5.2 4.9 1.8 Nine months ended September 30, 2015 321,810 2 $ 7.5 $ 9.6 $ 9.2 $ 1.7 Loss on Impairments The Company recorded a loss on impairment for the three months ended June 30, 2015 related to a vacant building in Hazelwood, MO. The Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell this property prior to June 30, 2015 to a third party market participant. The Company tested the property for impairment at December 31, 2014 and no impairment was noted. The Company updated the impairment calculation quarterly for changes in assumptions as necessary. The Company tested the property for impairment as of June 30, 2015 and it was determined that the carrying value of the asset group, based on the Company’s assessment of the various hold and sell scenarios, was not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Accordingly, the property was written down to its estimated fair value of $4.4 million and the Company recorded an impairment loss of $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. This loss was recorded in loss on impairments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the property was based on unobservable inputs ("Level 3") and this was a non-recurring fair value measurement. This property was sold during the three months ended September 30, 2015. The Company recorded a loss on impairment for the three months ended September 30, 2015 related to the property located in Canton, OH. The Company entered into a letter of intent to sell this property prior to September 30, 2015 to a third party market participant. The Company tested the property for impairment as of September 30, 2015 and it was determined that the carrying value of the asset group, based on the Company’s assessment of the various hold and sell scenarios, was not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Accordingly, the property was written down to its estimated fair value of $1.6 million and the Company recorded an impairment loss of $2.9 million based on a discounted cash flow analysis. This loss was recorded in loss on impairments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the property is based on Level 3 inputs and this is a non-recurring fair value measurement. The fair value was calculated using the following key Level 3 inputs: discount rate of 9.0% and exit capitalization rate of 12.0% . The letter of intent for the property included various contingencies, and was terminated subsequent to September 30, 2015. The Company recorded a loss on impairment for the three months ended September 30, 2015 related to the property located in Jefferson, NC. The Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell this property prior to September 30, 2015 to a third party market participant. The Company tested the property for impairment as of September 30, 2015 and it was determined that the carrying value of the asset group, based on the Company’s assessment of the various hold and sell scenarios, was not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Accordingly, the property was written down to its estimated fair value of $1.0 million based on pricing from market transactions for comparable properties and the Company recorded an impairment loss of $1.4 million . This loss was recorded in loss on impairments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the property is based on Level 3 inputs and this is a non-recurring fair value measurement. Since the purchase and sale agreement for the property includes various contingencies, the Company can make no assurance that it will sell the property or, if it does, what the timing of the sale will be. The Company recorded a loss on impairment for the three months ended September 30, 2015 related to the property located in Milwaukee, WI. The Company entered into a letter of intent to sell this property prior to September 30, 2015 to a third party market participant. The Company tested the property for impairment as of September 30, 2015 and it was determined that the carrying value of the asset group, based on the Company’s assessment of the various hold and sell scenarios, was not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Accordingly, the property was written down to its estimated fair value of $3.9 million based on pricing from market transactions for comparable properties and the Company recorded an impairment loss of $1.4 million . This loss was recorded in loss on impairments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the property is based on Level 3 inputs and this is a non-recurring fair value measurement. Since the letter of intent for the property includes various contingencies, the Company can make no assurance that it will sell the property or, if it does, what the timing of the sale will be. Deferred Leasing Intangibles The Company allocates the purchase price of business combinations of properties based upon the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired, which generally consist of land, buildings, tenant improvements, mortgage debt assumed, and deferred leasing intangibles which includes in‑place leases, above market and below market leases, and tenant relationships. The portion of the purchase price that is allocated to above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in‑place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease term plus the term of any bargain renewal options. The above and below market lease values are amortized into rental income over the remaining term plus the terms of bargain renewal options of the respective leases. The purchase price is further allocated to in‑place lease values and tenant relationships based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and its overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in‑place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of deferred leasing intangibles, are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships) as increases or decreases to depreciation and amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of above and below market leases are accelerated into rental income and the in‑place lease value and tenant relationships are accelerated into depreciation or amortization expense over the shortened lease term. The purchase price allocated to deferred leasing intangible assets are included in rental property on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and the purchase price allocated to deferred leasing intangible liabilities are included in the deferred leasing intangibles on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets under the liabilities section. Deferred leasing intangibles on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following (in thousands): September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Gross Accumulated Amortization Net Gross Accumulated Amortization Net Above market leases $ 68,569 $ (31,360 ) $ 37,209 63,830 $ (25,381 ) $ 38,449 Other intangible lease assets 385,483 (158,577 ) 226,906 $ 330,100 (120,645 ) 209,455 Total deferred leasing intangible assets $ 454,052 $ (189,937 ) $ 264,115 $ 393,930 $ (146,026 ) $ 247,904 Below market leases $ 19,109 $ (8,397 ) $ 10,712 $ 16,745 $ (6,565 ) $ 10,180 Total deferred leasing intangible liabilities $ 19,109 $ (8,397 ) $ 10,712 $ 16,745 $ (6,565 ) $ 10,180 The following table sets forth the amortization expense and the net decrease to rental revenue for the amortization of deferred leasing intangibles during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively (in millions): Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30, Deferred Leasing Intangibles Amortization 2015 2014 2015 2014 Net decrease to rental revenue related to above and below market lease amortization $ 2.0 $ 1.6 $ 6.3 $ 4.6 Amortization expense of other intangible lease assets $ 15.3 $ 12.5 $ 44.3 $ 36.1 As of September 30, 2015 , the amortization of deferred leasing intangibles over the next five years is as follows (in thousands): Amortization Expense of Other Intangible Lease Assets Net Decrease to Rental Revenue of Above and Below Market Lease Amortization Remainder of 2015 $ 15,416 $ 1,952 2016 $ 54,544 $ 5,986 2017 $ 44,670 $ 4,284 2018 $ 34,870 $ 3,004 2019 $ 25,055 $ 2,666 |