ENTEROLOGICS, INC
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(A) Organization
Enterologics, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 2, 2009 to develop, test, and obtaining regulatory approvals for, manufacturing, commercializing and selling new prescription drug products.
On September 6, 2011 Enterologics, Inc acquired BioBalance Corp and BioBalance LLC, and they are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Enterologics, Inc.
Activities during the development stage include developing the business plan, acquiring technology and raising capital.
(B) Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(C) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company at times has cash in excess of FDIC insurance limits and places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At March 31, 2012 and 2010 the Company did not have any balances that exceeded FDIC insurance limits.
(D) Website Development
The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 350 Intangible-Goodwills and Other. Costs incurred in the planning stage of a website are expensed, while costs incurred in the development stage are capitalized and amortized over the estimated three year life of the asset. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $3,145 respectively, in website development costs. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, amortization of $1,048 and $786 respectively has been taken.
(E) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements included the accounts of Enterologics, Inc and its wholly-owned subsidiary Biobalance Corp, and Biobalance LLC, from the date of acquisition of September 6, 2011 through March 31, 2012. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(F) Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant. The Company applies this statement prospectively.
Equity instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
(G) Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net (loss) per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no common share equivalents outstanding.
(H) Research and Development
In accordance with ASC Topic 730, “Research and Development”, expenditures for research and development of the Company’s products and services are expensed when incurred, and are included in operating expenses. The Company recognized research and development costs of $28,995 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
(I) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company's accounts payable, accrued expenses, and notes payable related approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.
(J) Acquisitions and Intangible Assets
We account for acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”) and ASC 350, Intangibles- Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”). The acquisition method of accounting requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at their fair values on the date of a business acquisition. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and results of operations reflect an acquired business from the completion date of an acquisition.
The judgments that we make in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can materially impact net income in periods following an asset acquisition.
(K) Long-lived Assets
Management evaluates the recoverability of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360, which generally requires the assessment of these assets for recoverability when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment exists. Events and circumstances considered by the Company in determining whether the carrying value of identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to: significant changes in performance relative to expected operating results, significant changes in the use of the assets, significant negative industry or economic trends, a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time, and changes in the Company’s business strategy. In determining if impairment exists, the Company estimates the undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the use and ultimate disposition of these assets. If impairment is indicated based on a comparison of the assets’ carrying values and the undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair market value of the assets.
(L) Fair Value
The Company measures the fair value of its assets and liabilities under the guidance of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements, but its provisions apply to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurement.
ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants based on the highest and best use of the asset or liability. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC 820 requires the Company to use valuation techniques to measure fair value that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized as follows:
| | · | Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
| | · | Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborated inputs; and |
| | · | Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets or liabilities. |
The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
| | A. | Market approach - Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities |
| | B. | Income approach - Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts, including present value techniques, option-pricing models and excess earnings method |
| | C. | Cost approach - Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost) |
The Company also adopted the provisions of ASC 825, Financial Instruments. ASC 825allows companies to choose to measure eligible assets and liabilities at fair value with changes in value recognized in earnings. Fair value treatment may be elected either upon initial recognition of an eligible asset or liability or, for an existing asset or liability, if an event triggers a new basis of accounting. The Company did not elect to re-measure any of its existing financial assets or liabilities under the provisions of this Statement and did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets and liabilities transacted in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2010. All of the Company’s intangible assets are valued using the level 3 inputs as of March 31, 2012.
(N) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU No. 2011-02; A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring(“TDR”).In April, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, intended to provide additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and are to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The Company has adopted the methodologies prescribed by this ASU.
ASU No. 2011-03; Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. In April, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03. The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to the transferor’s ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. The amendments in this ASU also eliminate the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets.
The guidance in this ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company has adopted the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and the ASU will does not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
ASU No. 2011-04; Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. In May, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04. The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of Topic 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.
The Company has adopted the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and the ASU does not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
ASU No. 2011-05; Amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. In June, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No.2011-05. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.
The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company has adopted ASU 2011-05, as of December 31, 2011.
NOTE 2 ASSET PURCHASE AQUISITION
On September 6, 2011, the Company acquired 100% of the common stock of Bio Balance Corp and its subsidiary Bio Balance LLC from New York Health Care,,Inc for $300,000 in cash, 393,391 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $150,000 based on the fair value on the date of the grant and a Note Payable for $100,000 to be paid in three equal installments of $33,333.33 with the first installment due on September 6, 2012, and annually thereafter with the last payment due no later than September 6, 2014. This note accrues interest at a rate of 5% per annum and $1,264 of interest expense was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2012. These financial statements are presented in a consolidated format.
| Purchase price | | $ | 550,000 | |
| Patents | | $ | 93,644 | |
| Goodwill | | | 481,353 | |
| Less: Assumption of Accounts Payable | | | -24,997 | |
| Total assets acquired | | $ | 550,000 | |
The table below summarizes the unaudited pro forma information of the results of operations as though the acquisitions had been completed as of January 1, 2011:
| | | Enterologics Corp and Subsidiary year ended December 31, 2011 | |
| Gross revenue | | $ | - | |
| Total expenses | | | (243,542) | |
| Net income (loss) before taxes | | $ | (243,542) | ) |
| Earnings (loss) per share | | $ | (0.01) | |
NOTE 3 NOTES PAYABLE- RELATED PARTIES
On March 23, 2009 a related party loaned $3,500 to the Company for initial start-up costs. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and matured on February 28, 2010. As of December 31, 2009 the Company recorded accrued interest of $135. In February 2010, the loan and accrued interest of $151 was repaid. (See note 5).
On August 17, 2010 a related party loaned $5,000 to the Company for initial start-up costs. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and originally matures on November 15, 2010, which was extended until February 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded accrued interest of $93. On January 10, 2010 the loan and accrued interest of $21 were repaid. (See note 5).
On October 22, 2010 a related party loaned $5,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and matures on January 15, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded accrued interest of $45. On January 10, 2010 the loan and accrued interest of $21 were repaid. (See note 5).
On November 24, 2010 a related party loaned $2,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and matures on May 23, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded accrued interest of $10On January 10, 2010 the loan and accrued interest of $8 were repaid. (See note 5).
On January 7, 2011, the Company entered into a loan agreement for a series of loans up to an aggregate of $50,000 and borrowed an initial $20,000 and issued 7% promissory notes to the lender. The principal and accrued interest under the note is due and payable on the earlier of October 9, 2011 or the date the Company receives $350,000 or more in proceeds from the sale of securities in a private offering or through an effective registration statement. During February 2011, the Company issued an additional promissory note for $10,000 due the earlier of October 9, 2011 or the date the Company receives proceeds from the sale of securities in a private offering or through an effective registration statement. In consideration of the loan commitments, the Company issued the lender 500,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $25,000 ($.05 per share) based on the most recent cash offering price (See Notes 2 and 5). On April 11, 2011 $30,000 plus accrued interest of $301 was repaid against all of the previously issued promissory notes.
On September 14, 2011 a related party loaned $50,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The Demand Promissory Note is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 6%, and be demanded to be repaid on or after October 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2012 the Company recorded accrued interest of $1,667. The loan has not been repaid as of April 25, 2012 and is currently in default. (See note 5).
On December 2, 2011 a related party loaned $25,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The Demand Promissory Note is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and be demanded to be repaid not before December 31, 2011. On January 18, 2012 the loan and accrued interest of $104 were repaid. (See note 5).
On December 19, 2011 a related party loaned $25,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The Demand Promissory Note is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and be demanded to be repaid not before December 31, 2011. On January 18, 2012 the loan and accrued interest of $161 were repaid. (See note 5).
NOTE 4 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY / (DEFICIENCY)
(A) Common Stock Issued to Founders for Cash
In September 2009 the Company sold a total of 10,300,000 shares of common stock to four founders for $1,030 ($.0001 per share).
(B) Common Stock Issued for Cash
In 2009, the Company sold a total of 15,700,000 shares of common stock to 55 individuals for cash of $47,080 and a subscription receivable of $20 ($.003 per share). Cash of $20 was collected during the year ended December 31, 2010.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 the Company sold a total of 8,500,000 shares of common stock to 3 individuals for cash of $425,000 ($0.05 per share).
On September 6, 2011, the Company issued 393,391 share of common stock as part of an asset purchase acquisition of Bio Balance Corp and its subsidiary Bio Balance LLC from New York Health Care. In addition $300,000 in cash was paid to New York Health Care and a Note Payable was issued for $100,000 to New York Health Care to be paid in three equal installments of $33,333.33 with the first installment due on September 6, 2012, and the annually thereafter with the last payment due no later than September 6, 2014. This note accrues interest at a rate of 5% per annum and $1,263 of interest expense was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
(C) Loan Commitment Fee
On January 7, 2011 the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to a related party valued at ($.05 per share) the most recent cash offering price, as a loan commitment fee. The commitment ends on September 7, 2011. The Company is amortizing the value over the term of the commitment.
(D) Imputed Compensation
During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, an individual contributed services to the Company at a fair value of $0 and $3,000 respectively.
(E)Stock Issued for Services
In May 2010 Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock to an outside vendor for services with a fair value of $60 ($.003 per share), based on a recent cash offering price.
(F) Preferred Stock
In October 2009, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase its authorized shares to 155,000,000 shares which shall consist of 150,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $.0001 and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $.0001 with rights and preferences to be determined by the Board of Directors.
NOTE 5 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On March 23, 2009 a related party loaned $3,500 to the Company for initial start-up costs. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and matured on February 28, 2010. As of December 31, 2009 the Company recorded accrued interest of $135. In February 2010, the loan and accrued interest of $151 was repaid.
On August 17, 2010 a related party loaned $5,000 to the Company for initial start-up costs. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and originally matures on November 15, 2010, which was extended until February 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded accrued interest of $93. On January 10, 2010 the loan and accrued interest of $21 were repaid.
On October 22, 2010 a related party loaned $5,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and matures on January 15, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded accrued interest of $45. On January 10, 2010 the loan and accrued interest of $21 were repaid.
On November 24, 2010 a related party loaned $2,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The loan is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and matures on May 23, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded accrued interest of $10On January 10, 2010 the loan and accrued interest of $8 were repaid.
On September 14, 2011 a related party loaned $50,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The Demand Promissory Note is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 6%, and be demanded to be repaid on or after October 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2012 the Company recorded accrued interest of $1,667. The loan has not been repaid as of April 25, 2012 and is currently in default.
On December 2, 2011 a related party loaned $25,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The Demand Promissory Note is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and be demanded to be repaid not before December 31, 2011. On January 18, 2012 the loan and accrued interest of $104 were repaid.
On December 19, 2011 a related party loaned $25,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The Demand Promissory Note is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 5%, and be demanded to be repaid not before December 31, 2011. On January 18, 2012 the loan and accrued interest of $161 were repaid.
NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On January 12, 2011, the Company entered into a letter of intent with UST pursuant to which it was granted a right of first refusal until May 15, 2012 to enter into a definitive license agreement for the exclusive, world-wide license to UST’s intellectual property for the preservation/stabilization of E. coli probiotic bacteria. The license is intended to specifically cover E. coli bacteria when used as a probiotic and exclude use as a system for delivering vaccine materials to the gastrointestinal tract.
On May 15, 2011, the company entered into a one-year development agreement for UST to conduct suitability studies and protocols to produce data demonstrating the suitability of its stabilization technology to produce a thermostable, commercially viable formulation of an E. coli probiotic satisfying their specifications. It is contemplated that during such one-year development project the Company will make monthly payments of at least CA$8,333 (which amount may be increased depending on the scope of the work). From January 15, 2011 to May 15, 2012 UST will not negotiate with, or entertain or consider offers from, any third party with respect to the same terms of the letter of intent. The Company’s right to enter into a definitive license agreement with UST will terminate if it fails to make such monthly payments.
The letter of intent provides that the Company will negotiate in good faith with UST to enter into a license agreement by May 15, 2012 for the exclusive, worldwide license to develop, manufacture, use, sublicense, market and sell UST’s patents, patent applications, know-how and trade secrets relating to its preservation/stabilization of E. coli bacteria. Such agreement will expire on the later of (i) 20 years or (ii) the last to expire patent included in the licensed intellectual property.
Upon execution of the license agreement, the Company will be required to issue 100,000 shares of our common stock to UST and to pay CA$75,000 as license issue and technology transfer fees. In addition, the Company will be obligated to pay UST CA$50,000 for each new patent granted, minimum annual license payments of CA$25,000 until the first FDA approval of the BLA and CA$50,000 following the approval of the BLA, with annual payments increasing by CA$25,000 thereafter to a maximum of CA$100,000 for a orphan drug and CA$150,000 for a drug for a larger indication market. The Company will also be required to make royalty payments of up to 3% on net sales of the licensed products sold by us or our sublicenses. The Company’s right to sublicense under the license agreement is subject to UST’s approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld. In the event that the Company receives other than cash consideration from a sublicense, it will be required to pay 20% of the fair market value of such consideration to UST and in the case of equity, 20% of shares issued.
All amounts required to be paid to UST by the Company will be made in Canadian dollars at UST’s request. The Company will be required to cover any currency conversion and bank transfer costs up to 1% of the total payment. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 the company made payments to UST totaling $25,222 US Dollars.
NOTE 7 NOTES PAYABLE
On January 11, 2012 the Company entered into a letter of agreement for a series of loans up to an aggregate of $100,000 and on January 17, 2012 borrowed an initial $50,000 and issued 5% promissory notes to the lender. The principal and accrued interest under the note is due and payable on July 16, 2012. On February 3, 2012 the Company borrowed an additional $25,000 and issued 5% promissory notes to the lender. The principal and accrued interest under the note is due and payable on August 1, 2012. On March 14, 2012 the Company borrowed an additional $25,000 and issued 5% promissory notes to the lender. The principal and accrued interest under the note is due and payable on September 14, 2012. This was the final borrowing under the letter of agreement.
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company is in the development stage with no operations, a net loss of $362,114 from inception, used cash in operations from inception of $306,257. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company's ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
On April 27, 2012 a related party loaned $10,000 to the Company for operating expenses. The Demand Promissory Note is unsecured, carries an interest rate of 6%, and be demanded to be repaid on or after May 30, 2012. The loan was repaid on May 10, 2012 with accrued interest of $21.37.
On May 10, 2012, the Company entered into a loan agreement for $50,000 and issued a 5% promissory note to the lender. The principal and accrued interest under the note is due and payable on November 10, 2012 and has a conversion feature . In consideration of the loan, the Company issued the lender 250,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $12, 500 ($.05 per share) based on the most recent cash offering price.
On May 14, 2012 the Company and UST extended the time to enter into a license agreement until August 15, 2012.
NOTE 10 RECLASSIFICATION
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications were limited to the Consolidated Balance Sheet presentation and did not impact the Consolidated Statement of Operations, and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
For the period ended March 31, 2012, $100,000 was reclassified to “Notes payable – related party” from “Notes payable” to conform to current year’s presentation.
