UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
or
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34753
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 27-2053069 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
5964 La Place Court Carlsbad, California | 92008-8829 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 760-448-4300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock on May 1, 2014 was 41,610,023.
GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | Page |
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
Item 1. | | |
Item 2. | | |
Item 3. | | |
Item 4. | | |
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION | |
Item 1. | | |
Item 1A. | | |
Item 2. | | |
Item 3. | | |
Item 4. | | |
Item 5. | | |
Item 6. | | |
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Current Assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 27,883 |
| | $ | 35,723 |
|
Investments | 69,793 |
| | 69,866 |
|
Accounts receivable - net of allowances of $2,736 and $2,736 | 2,576 |
| | 2,859 |
|
Inventories | 1,768 |
| | 2,102 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 627 |
| | 552 |
|
Total current assets | 102,647 |
| | 111,102 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 9,590 |
| | 8,591 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 1,140 |
| | 1,197 |
|
Restricted cash | 758 |
| | 758 |
|
Other long-term assets | 106 |
| | 106 |
|
Total assets | $ | 114,241 |
| | $ | 121,754 |
|
Current liabilities | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 3,833 |
| | $ | 3,863 |
|
Accrued compensation | 3,385 |
| | 3,375 |
|
Loan payable | — |
| | 37 |
|
Other current liabilities | 2,895 |
| | 2,962 |
|
Total current liabilities | 10,113 |
| | 10,237 |
|
Long-term liabilities | | | |
Deferred rent | 1,566 |
| | 1,601 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities | 745 |
| | 748 |
|
Total liabilities | 12,424 |
| | 12,586 |
|
Stockholders’ equity | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000 authorized, none issued | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000 authorized; 41,585 and 41,520 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 4 |
| | 4 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 334,777 |
| | 333,363 |
|
Accumulated deficit | (232,992) |
| | (224,209) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 28 |
| | 10 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity | 101,817 |
| | 109,168 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 114,241 |
| | $ | 121,754 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Revenue | | | |
Product revenue | $ | 7,866 |
| | $ | 10,968 |
|
License and other revenue | 47 |
| | 133 |
|
Total revenue | 7,913 |
| | 11,101 |
|
Cost of revenue | 3,710 |
| | 5,034 |
|
Gross profit | 4,203 |
| | 6,067 |
|
Operating expenses | | | |
Sales and marketing | 2,979 |
| | 2,359 |
|
General and administrative | 2,814 |
| | 2,558 |
|
Research and development | 7,270 |
| | 5,381 |
|
Total operating expenses | 13,063 |
| | 10,298 |
|
Loss from operations | (8,860) |
| | (4,231) |
|
Other income (expense) | | | |
Interest income | 284 |
| | 75 |
|
Interest expense | (1 | ) | | (7 | ) |
Other income (expense) | (200) |
| | (5 | ) |
Total other income (expense) | 83 |
| | 63 |
|
Loss before income taxes | (8,777) |
| | (4,168) |
|
Provision for income taxes | (6 | ) | | (7 | ) |
Net loss | $ | (8,783 | ) | | $ | (4,175 | ) |
Net loss per share, basic and diluted | $ | (0.21 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 41,079 |
| | 31,835 |
|
Other comprehensive loss | | | |
Net loss | $ | (8,783 | ) | | $ | (4,175 | ) |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments, net of tax | 12 |
| | (4 | ) |
Comprehensive loss | $ | (8,771 | ) | | $ | (4,179 | ) |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Operating activities | | | |
Net loss | $ | (8,783 | ) | | $ | (4,175 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 574 |
| | 498 |
|
Amortization of premiums on investments | 198 |
| | — |
|
Stock-based compensation | 1,389 |
| | 697 |
|
Provision for bad debt | — |
| | 29 |
|
Non-cash inventory adjustments | 219 |
| | 403 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts receivable | 283 |
| | (1,202 | ) |
Inventories | 169 |
| | (1,531 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 107 |
| | (116 | ) |
Accounts payable | (449 | ) | | 129 |
|
Accrued compensation | 10 |
| | (856 | ) |
Other liabilities | (101 | ) | | 20 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities | (6,384 | ) | | (6,104 | ) |
Investing activities | | | |
Change in restricted cash | — |
| | 249 |
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities | (13,039 | ) | | (13,848 | ) |
Payments for intellectual property licenses | — |
| | (345 | ) |
Purchases of property and equipment | (1,149 | ) | | (1,003 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities | 5,499 |
| | 2,000 |
|
Maturities of short-term investments | 7,250 |
| | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,439 | ) | | (12,947 | ) |
Financing activities | | | |
Principal repayment of borrowings | (42 | ) | | (287 | ) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises | 25 |
| | 105 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | (17 | ) | | (182 | ) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (7,840 | ) | | (19,233 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 35,723 |
| | 51,250 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 27,883 |
| | $ | 32,017 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities | | | |
Transfer of systems from property and equipment into inventory | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 54 |
|
Property and equipment costs incurred but not paid included in accounts payable | $ | 1,022 |
| | $ | 333 |
|
Intellectual property acquisition included in other noncurrent liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 453 |
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures | | | |
Cash paid for income taxes, net | $ | 8 |
| | $ | — |
|
Cash received for interest | $ | 284 |
| | $ | 75 |
|
Cash paid for interest | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 7 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., the Company or GenMark, was formed by Osmetech plc, or Osmetech, as a Delaware corporation in February 2010, and had no operations prior to its initial public offering, or the IPO, which was completed in June 2010. Immediately prior to the closing of the IPO, GenMark acquired all of the outstanding ordinary shares of Osmetech in a reorganization under the applicable laws of the United Kingdom. As a result of the reorganization, all of the issued ordinary shares in Osmetech were cancelled in consideration of (i) the issuance of common stock of GenMark to the former shareholders of Osmetech and (ii) the issuance of new shares in Osmetech to GenMark. Following the reorganization, Osmetech became a subsidiary controlled by GenMark, and the former shareholders of Osmetech received shares of GenMark. Any historical discussion of GenMark relates to Osmetech and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to the reorganization. In September 2012, GenMark placed Osmetech into liquidation to simplify its corporate structure. The liquidation of Osmetech was completed in the fourth quarter of 2013.
As the reorganization was deemed to be a transaction under common control, GenMark accounted for the reorganization in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests, meaning:
| |
i. | assets and liabilities were carried over at their respective carrying values; |
| |
ii. | common stock was carried over at the nominal value of the shares issued by GenMark; |
| |
iii. | additional paid-in capital represented the difference between the nominal value of the shares issued by GenMark, and the total of the additional paid-in capital and nominal value of Osmetech’s shares cancelled pursuant to the reorganization; and |
| |
iv. | the accumulated deficit represented the aggregate of the accumulated deficit of Osmetech and GenMark. |
Once the reorganization became effective, all stock options granted under the Osmetech plc 2003 U.S. Equity Compensation Plan, long term incentive awards and all warrants issued by Osmetech were exchanged for options and warrants exercisable for common stock of the Company.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses from operations since its inception and had an accumulated deficit of $233.0 million at March 31, 2014. Management expects operating losses to continue for the foreseeable future. The Company's ability to transition to profitable operations is dependent upon achieving a level of revenues adequate to support its cost structure through expanding its product offerings and consequently increasing its product revenues. Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments at March 31, 2014 were $98.4 million. The Company has prepared cash flow forecasts which indicate, based on the Company’s current cash resources available, that the Company will have sufficient resources to fund its business for at least the next 12 months.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, and applicable regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 11, 2014. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Interim period operating results may not be indicative of the operating results for the full year or any future period.
Segment Information
The Company currently operates in one reportable business segment, which encompasses the development, manufacturing, sales and support of instruments and molecular tests based on its proprietary eSensor® detection technology. Substantially all of the Company’s operations and assets are in the United States of America.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, or other standard setting bodies that the Company adopts as of the specified effective date. The Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations upon adoption.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit with banks, money market instruments and certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. Short-term investments consist of certificates of deposit that mature in greater than three months, but less than one year from the date of purchase. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, if any, are stated at cost which approximates their fair market value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents amounts designated for uses other than current operations and included $758,000 at March 31, 2014, which is held as security for the Company’s letter of credit with Banc of California related to the Company's facility lease.
Receivables
Accounts receivable consist of amounts due to the Company for sales to customers and are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on an assessment of the collectability of specific customer accounts, the aging of accounts receivable, and a reserve for unknown items based upon the Company’s historical experience.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the notes thereto. The Company’s significant estimates included in the preparation of the financial statements are related to accounts receivable, inventories, property and equipment, intangible assets, employee related compensation accruals, warranty liabilities, tax valuation accounts and stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Product Shipment Costs
Product shipment costs are included in cost of revenues in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Shipping and handling costs were approximately $58,000 and $97,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Product Warranties
The Company generally offers a one-year warranty for its systems sold to customers and typically up to a sixty day warranty for reagents. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty reserves include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty repairs and the cost per repair. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of the warranty reserve and adjusts the amount as necessary.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are comprised of licenses or sublicenses to technology covered by patents owned by third parties, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives of these assets, which is generally 10 years. Amortization of licenses typically begins upon the Company obtaining access to the licensed technology and is recorded in cost of revenues for licenses supporting commercialized products. The amortization of licenses to technology supporting products in development is recorded in research and development expenses.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets, including intangible assets, by periodically evaluating the carrying value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If impairment is indicated, the Company writes down the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value. This fair value is primarily determined based on estimated discounted cash flows.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and include direct labor, materials, and manufacturing overhead. The Company periodically reviews inventory for evidence of slow-moving or obsolete parts, and writes inventory down to market. This write down is based on management’s review of inventories on hand, compared to estimated future usage and sales, shelf-life assumptions, and assumptions about the likelihood of obsolescence. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by the Company, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Inventory impairment charges establish a new cost basis for inventory and charges are not reversed subsequently to income, even if circumstances later suggest that increased carrying amounts are recoverable.
Property and Equipment, net
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which are identified below.
|
| |
Machinery and laboratory equipment | 3 - 5 years |
Instruments | 4 years |
Office equipment | 5 years |
Leasehold improvements | over the shorter of the remaining life of the lease or the useful economic life of the asset |
Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes
Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. A deferred income tax liability or asset is established for the expected future tax consequences resulting from the differences in financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A full valuation allowance has been recorded against the Company’s net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the Company’s ability to utilize these assets in the future. The Company provides for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards prescribed by the authoritative guidance on income taxes. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted in periods when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled. The Company recognizes accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
A tax position that is more likely than not to be realized is measured at the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with the taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Measurement of a tax position that meets the more likely than not threshold considers the amounts and probabilities of the outcomes that could be realized upon settlement using the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date.
2. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units granted to employees and directors in exchange for services. The compensation expense is based on the fair value of the applicable award utilizing various assumptions regarding the underlying attributes of the award. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded in cost of sales, sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administration expenses based on the employee's respective function.
The estimated fair value of stock options granted, net of forfeitures expected to occur during the vesting period, is amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis to reflect vesting as it occurs. The expense is derived from the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model that uses several judgment-based variables to calculate the expense. The inputs include the expected term of the stock option, the expected volatility and other factors.
| |
• | Expected Term. Expected term represents the period that the stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding and is determined by using the simplified method. |
| |
• | Expected Volatility. Expected volatility represents the volatility in the Company’s estimated stock price over the expected term of the stock option and is determined by review of the Company’s and similar companies’ historical experience. |
| |
• | Expected Dividend. The Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model calls for a single expected dividend yield as an input. The Company assumed no dividends as it has never paid dividends and has no current plans to do so. |
| |
• | Risk-Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model is based on published U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected term of the option. |
The compensation expense related to the grant of restricted stock awards or units is calculated as the fair market value of the stock on the grant date as further adjusted to reflect expected forfeitures.
Employee participation in the Company's 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2010 Plan, is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. All stock options granted under the 2010 Plan are exercisable at a per share price equal to the closing quoted market price of a share of the Company’s stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on the grant date and generally vest over a period of between one and four years.
Stock options are generally exercisable for a period of up to 10 years after grant and are typically forfeited if employment is terminated before the options vest. As of March 31, 2014, there were 355,915 shares available for future grant under the 2010 Plan. Each grant of stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units reduces the number of shares available for grant under the 2010 Plan.
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the three month period ended March 31, 2014:
|
| | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 1,821,216 |
| | $ | 6.89 |
|
Granted | 805,414 |
| | $ | 12.30 |
|
Exercised | (5,816) |
| | $ | 4.35 |
|
Cancelled | (27,549) |
| | $ | 6.82 |
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2014 | 2,593,265 |
| | $ | 8.58 |
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2014 | 1,182,398 |
| | $ | 5.90 |
|
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $7.79. Options that were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 had a remaining weighted average contractual term of 6.84 years, and an aggregate intrinsic value of $4,870,078. As of March 31, 2014, there were 2,593,265 stock options outstanding, which had a remaining weighted average contractual term of 7.98 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $6,017,259.
Valuation of Stock-Based Awards
The assumptions used in the valuation of stock-based awards for the periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are summarized in the following table:
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Expected volatility (%) | 70 | % | | 74 | % |
Expected life (years) | 6.08 |
| | 6.08 |
|
Risk free interest rate (%) | 1.82 | % | | 1.08 | % |
Expected dividend yield (%) | 0 | % | | 0 | % |
In March 2013, the Company transitioned to granting restricted stock units under the 2010 Plan in lieu of granting restricted stock awards. The Company’s restricted stock award and restricted stock unit activity for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted Stock Awards | | Restricted Stock Units |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Non-vested at December 31, 2013 | 508,606 |
| | $ | 4.54 |
| | 474,847 |
| | $ | 11.51 |
|
Granted | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 367,382 |
| | $ | 12.30 |
|
Vested | (139,162) |
| | $ | 4.33 |
| | (59,112) |
| | $ | 10.92 |
|
Canceled or expired | (13,094) |
| | $ | 4.71 |
| | (12,512) |
| | $ | 10.70 |
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2014 | 356,350 |
| | $ | 4.61 |
| | 770,605 |
| | $ | 11.95 |
|
As of March 31, 2014, there was $1,532,995 of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.87 years. The total fair value of restricted stock awards that vested during the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $1,746,771 and $147,221, respectively. As of March 31, 2014, there was $8,160,500 of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.08 years.
Restricted stock awards or units may be granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors under the 2010 Plan in connection with the hiring or retention of personnel and are subject to certain conditions. Restrictions expire at certain dates in accordance with specific provisions in the applicable award agreement. During the three month period ended March 31, 2014, the Company did not grant any shares of restricted stock. The Company granted 367,382 restricted stock units during the three month period ended March 31, 2014, which had a grant date fair value of $12.30 per share. During the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, stock compensation expense for restricted stock units and awards was charged to expense over the restriction period and amounted to $911,119 and $384,000, respectively.
The Company issued performance-based restricted stock units for the first time in March 2014. The vesting and issuance of Company stock pursuant to these awards depends on obtaining regulatory clearance of various products within a defined timeline. Stock-based compensation expense for these performance-based awards is recognized when it is probable that the applicable performance criteria will be satisfied. The probability of achieving the relevant performance criteria is evaluated on a quarterly basis. At March 31, 2014, there was $531,360 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to these awards.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Following the adoption of the GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP, by the Company’s Board of Directors in March 2013, the Company's stockholders approved the ESPP in May 2013 at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A total of 650,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were originally reserved for issuance under the ESPP, which permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll deductions.
The price at which stock is purchased under the ESPP is equal to 85% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the first or the last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. Generally, each offering under the ESPP will be for a period of six months as determined by the Company's Board of Directors; provided that no offering period may exceed 27 months. Employees may invest up to 10% of their qualifying gross compensation through payroll deductions. In no event may an employee purchase more than 1,500 shares of common stock during any six-month offering period. As of March 31, 2014, there were 616,561 shares of common stock available for issuance under the ESPP. As the ESPP is a compensatory plan as defined by the authoritative guidance for stock compensation, stock-based compensation expense has been recorded during the three month period ended March 31, 2014.
The fair value of each purchase option under the ESPP is estimated at the beginning of each six-month offering period
using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
| | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2014 |
Expected volatility (%) | 47 | % |
Expected life (years) | 0.5 |
|
Risk free rate (%) | 0.07 | % |
Expected dividend yield (%) | 0 | % |
3. Net Loss per Common Share
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing loss available to stockholders of our common stock (the numerator) by the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the period (the denominator). Shares issued during the period and shares reacquired during the period are weighted for the portion of the period that they were outstanding. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a similar way to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential shares had been issued, unless the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The computations of diluted net loss per share for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 did not include the effects of the following stock options and restricted stock awards which were outstanding as of the end of each period because the inclusion of these securities would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands).
|
| | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Options outstanding to purchase common stock | 2,593 | | 1,888 |
Unvested restricted stock | 1,127 | | 797 |
Total | 3,720 | | 2,685 |
4. Inventories
Inventory on hand as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Raw materials | $ | 741 |
| | $ | 713 |
|
Work-in-process | 659 |
| | 437 |
|
Finished goods | 368 |
| | 952 |
|
| $ | 1,768 |
| | $ | 2,102 |
|
5. Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment comprised the following as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Property and equipment—at cost: | | | |
Plant and machinery | $ | 4,404 |
| | $ | 3,260 |
|
Instruments | 6,874 |
| | 7,013 |
|
Office equipment | 1,352 |
| | 1,325 |
|
Leasehold improvements | 4,013 |
| | 3,755 |
|
Total property and equipment—at cost | 16,643 |
| | 15,353 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation | (7,053 | ) | | (6,762 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 9,590 |
| | $ | 8,591 |
|
Depreciation expense was $516,000 and $416,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
6. Intangible Assets, net
Intangible assets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| Gross carrying amount | | Accumulated amortization | | Net carrying amount | | Gross carrying amount | | Accumulated amortization | | Net carrying amount |
Licensed intellectual property | $ | 2,347 |
| | (1,207) | | $ | 1,140 |
| | $ | 2,409 |
| | (1,212) | | $ | 1,197 |
|
Intellectual property licenses have a weighted average remaining amortization period of 7.03 years as of March 31, 2014. Amortization expense for intangible assets for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $58,000 and $64,000, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense for these licenses (assuming no impairment charges) is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
Fiscal Years Ending | Future Amortization Expense |
Remaining in 2014 | $ | 107 |
|
2015 | 142 |
|
2016 | 140 |
|
2017 | 140 |
|
2018 | 140 |
|
Thereafter | 471 |
|
Total | $ | 1,140 |
|
7. Loan Payable
In September 2012, the Company entered into a term loan with Banc of California, consisting of the following two loans.
1) The Company increased the letter of credit provided to its landlord of its Carlsbad, California facility to $758,000 from the previous letter of credit of $500,000. The increase in the letter of credit was required by the Company’s landlord in connection with the Company’s lease of additional space at this facility. This letter of credit was secured with $758,000 of restricted cash at March 31, 2014.
2) The Company obtained a variable rate term loan from Banc of California in the amount of $836,000 with an initial interest rate of 3.75% that expired in July 2013. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had repaid all outstanding amounts under this loan.
8. Leases
The Company has operating and capital lease agreements for its office, manufacturing, warehousing and laboratory space and for office equipment. Rent and operating expenses charged under these arrangements was $295,000 and $199,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Pursuant to the Company's lease agreements, a portion of the monthly rent has been deferred. The balance of deferred rent as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $1,698,000 and $1,725,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2014, the future minimum lease payments required over the next five years under the Company's lease arrangements are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | |
Fiscal Years Ending | | Amount |
Remaining in 2014 | | $ | 793 |
|
2015 | | 1,084 |
|
2016 | | 1,116 |
|
2017 | | 1,123 |
|
2018 | | 1,155 |
|
Thereafter | | 3,045 |
|
Total minimum lease payments | | $ | 8,316 |
|
9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of financial instruments, such as cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate the related fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
The Company uses a fair value hierarchy with three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and
the last unobservable, to measure fair value:
• Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2 — Inputs, other than Level 1, that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
• Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the financial statements of the Company and the valuation approach applied to each class of financial instruments at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 |
| Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total |
Money market funds (cash equivalents) | $ | 10 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10 |
|
Corporate notes and bonds | — |
| | 25,469 |
| | — |
| | 25,469 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities | — |
| | 36,032 |
| | — |
| | 36,032 |
|
Commercial paper | — |
| | 8,292 |
| | — |
| | 8,292 |
|
| $ | 10 |
| | $ | 69,793 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 69,803 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 |
| Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total |
Money market funds (cash equivalents) | $ | 20 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 20 |
|
Corporate notes and bonds | — |
| | 22,954 |
| | — |
| | 22,954 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities | — |
| | 43,115 |
| | — |
| | 43,115 |
|
Commercial paper | — |
| | 3,797 |
| | — |
| | 3,797 |
|
| $ | 20 |
| | $ | 69,866 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 69,886 |
|
Level 2 available-for-sale securities are priced using quoted market prices for similar instruments or nonbinding market prices that are corroborated by observable market data. The Company uses inputs such as actual trade data, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, and other similar data, which are obtained from quoted market prices, independent pricing vendors, or other sources, to determine the ultimate fair value of these assets and liabilities. The Company uses such pricing data as the primary input to make its assessments and determinations as to the ultimate valuation of its investment portfolio and has not made, during the periods presented, any material adjustments to such inputs.
10. Investments
The following table summarizes the Company’s available-for-sale investments at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2014 | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Estimated Fair Value |
Corporate notes and bonds | | $ | 25,469 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,469 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities | | 36,020 |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| | 36,032 |
|
Commercial paper | | 8,292 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,292 |
|
Total | | $ | 69,781 |
| | $ | 12 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 69,793 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2013 | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Estimated Fair Value |
Corporate notes and bonds | | $ | 22,950 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 22,954 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities | | 43,124 |
| | — |
| | (9 | ) | | 43,115 |
|
Commercial paper | | 3,797 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,797 |
|
Total | | $ | 69,871 |
|
| $ | 4 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 69,866 |
|
The following table summarizes the maturities of the Company’s available-for-sale securities at March 31, 2014 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Estimated Fair Value |
Due in one year or less | $ | 56,020 |
| | $ | 56,031 |
|
Due after one year through two years | 13,761 |
| | 13,762 |
|
Total | $ | 69,781 |
| | $ | 69,793 |
|
11. Income Taxes
The Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates, to determine its quarterly provision for income taxes. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rates from quarter to quarter.
As of March 31, 2014, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against all of its net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the Company’s ability to utilize these assets in the future. Provision for income taxes was $6,000 and $7,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Due to the Company’s losses, it only records a tax provision or benefit related to minimum tax payments or refunds and interest related to its uncertain tax positions.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $382,000 as of each of December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014, which would impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. The gross liability for income taxes related to unrecognized tax benefits is included in other long-term liabilities in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The total balance of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was $228,000 as of March 31, 2014. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. The Company expects its unrecognized tax benefits to change during the next 12 months due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for the tax year in which the benefit was taken.
The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and in various state jurisdictions. In previous years, the Company was also subject to income taxes in the United Kingdom based upon its legacy operations. As of March 31, 2014, the Company’s tax years after 2008 are subject to examination by the U.K. tax authorities. Except for net operating losses generated in prior years carrying forward to the current year, as of March 31, 2014, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, or local examinations for years before 2007.
| |
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report, as well as the audited financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections and the beliefs and assumptions of our management, including, without limitation, our expectations regarding our results of operations, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses, and the sufficiency of our cash for future operations. Words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “target,” “project,” “believe,” “goals,” “estimate,” “potential,” “predict,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “might,” “could,” “intend,” variations of these terms or the negative of those terms and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements.
Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by our forward-looking statements are those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 11, 2014. We assume no obligation to update these forward looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
Overview
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., or GenMark, was formed by Osmetech plc, or Osmetech, as a Delaware corporation in February 2010. GenMark had no operations prior to its initial public offering, which was completed in June 2010. Immediately prior to the closing of the initial public offering, GenMark acquired all of the outstanding ordinary shares of Osmetech in a reorganization under the applicable laws of the United Kingdom. As a result of the reorganization, all of the issued ordinary shares in Osmetech were cancelled in consideration of: (i) the issuance of common stock of GenMark to the former shareholders of Osmetech; and (ii) the issuance of new shares in Osmetech to GenMark. Following the reorganization, Osmetech became a wholly-owned subsidiary controlled by GenMark, and the former shareholders of Osmetech received shares of GenMark. Once the reorganization became effective, all stock options granted under the Osmetech plc 2003 U.S. Equity Compensation Plan, long term incentive awards and all warrants issued by Osmetech were exchanged for options and warrants exercisable for the common stock of GenMark. Any historical discussion of GenMark relates to Osmetech and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to the reorganization. In September 2012, GenMark placed Osmetech into liquidation to simplify its corporate structure. The liquidation of Osmetech was completed in the fourth quarter of 2013.
We are a molecular diagnostics company focused on developing and commercializing our proprietary eSensor® detection technology. Our proprietary electrochemical technology enables fast, accurate and highly sensitive detection of up to 72 distinct biomarkers in a single sample. Our XT-8 system received 510(k) clearance from the FDA and is designed to support a broad range of molecular diagnostic tests with a compact and easy-to-use workstation and self-contained, disposable test cartridges. Within approximately 30 minutes of receipt of an extracted and amplified nucleic acid sample, our XT-8 system produces clear and accurate results. Our XT-8 system supports up to 24 independent test cartridges, each of which can be run independently, resulting in a highly convenient and flexible workflow for our target customers, which are hospitals and reference laboratories. As of March 31, 2014, we had an installed base of 444 XT-8 analyzers, or placements, with our customers.
Since inception, we have incurred net losses from operations each year, and we expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. Our net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $8,783,000 and $4,175,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $232,992,000. Our operations to date have been funded principally through sales of capital stock, borrowings and cash from operations. We expect to incur increasing expenses over the next several years, principally to develop our NexGen system and additional diagnostic tests, as well as to further increase our capability to manufacture, sell and market our products.
Our Products and Technology
We have developed eight tests for use with our XT-8 system. Four of our diagnostic tests have received FDA clearance, including our Cystic Fibrosis Genotyping Test, which detects genetic changes associated with cystic fibrosis, our Warfarin Sensitivity Test, which determines an individual’s ability to metabolize the oral anticoagulant warfarin, our Thrombophilia Risk Test, which detects an individual’s increased risk of blood clots, and our Respiratory Viral Panel, which simultaneously detects and differentiates 14 clinically relevant viruses from patients with influenza-like illnesses. Our eSensor® technology has demonstrated 100% accuracy in clinical studies compared to DNA sequencing and other standards in our Cystic Fibrosis Genotyping Test, our Warfarin Sensitivity Test and our Thrombophilia Risk Test. We have also developed two HCV genotyping tests, a 3A4/3A5 genotyping test and a 2C19 genotyping test, versions of which are available for research use only (RUO).
In addition, we are developing our NexGen system, which is being designed to integrate automated nucleic acid extraction and amplification with our eSensor® detection technology to enable technicians using the NexGen system to place a raw or a minimally prepared patient sample directly into our test cartridge and obtain results without any additional steps. This sample-to-answer capability is enabled by the robust nature of our eSensor® detection technology, which is not impaired by sample impurities that we believe hinder competing technologies. We are designing our NexGen system to further simplify workflow and provide powerful, cost-effective molecular diagnostics solutions to a significantly expanded group of hospitals and reference laboratories.
We are also currently developing seven assays for our NexGen system, which include gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial identification panels, a respiratory panel (RP), a gastrointestinal (GI) panel, an HCV genotyping panel, a central nervous system (CNS) infection panel, and a fungal infection panel. We intend to continue investing in our NexGen system and its related test menu for the foreseeable future. We currently expect to complete the development of our NexGen system in the summer of 2014, initiate the European launch of the system in late 2014, and launch the system in the United States in the second half of 2015.
Revenue
Revenue from operations includes product sales, principally of our diagnostic tests for use with our XT-8 system. We primarily place our XT-8 system with customers through a reagent rental agreement, under which we retain title to the instrument and customers commit to purchasing minimum quantities of reagents and test cartridges over a period of one to three years. We also offer our XT-8 system for sale.
Revenue also includes licensing revenue from the out-licensing of our electrochemical detection technology. We may enter into additional sub-licenses of our technology generating additional revenue, but do not anticipate that this will provide a significant portion of our future revenue.
Our growth plans in 2014 focus primarily on reagent rental agreements and sales of our current XT-8 system. In late 2014 and beyond, our growth plans also focus on sales and placements of our NexGen system that is currently under development. We do not anticipate any U.S. sales of our NexGen system in 2014 and expect only a limited number of international sales of our NexGen system in late 2014. We plan to continue expanding our base of XT-8 customers and systems as well as test utilization among our customers. We expect sales of our XT-8 test cartridges to be our primary source of revenue during 2014 and until the commercial launch of our NexGen system and related tests.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues includes the cost of materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead costs used in the manufacture of our consumable test kits for our XT-8 system, including royalties on product sales. Cost of revenues also includes depreciation on revenue generating systems that have been placed with our customers under a reagent rental agreement, amortization of licenses related to our products and other costs such as warranty, royalty and customer technical support. We manufacture our test cartridges in our facility and have recently invested in significant capacity for expansion. This potential underutilized capacity may result in a high cost of revenues relative to revenue, if manufacturing volumes are not able to fully absorb operating costs. Our XT-8 systems are procured from a contract manufacturer and are generally capitalized as fixed assets and depreciated on a straight line basis over their useful life as a charge to cost of revenues. We expect our cost of revenues to increase as we place additional XT-8 systems and manufacture and sell our menu of accompanying diagnostic tests; however, we expect our gross margins to increase as manufacturing efficiencies, improved procurement practices, instrument reliability increases and other improvements decrease costs as a percentage of sales.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses include costs associated with our direct sales force, sales management, marketing, technical support and business development activities. These expenses primarily consist of salaries, commissions, benefits, stock-based compensation, travel, advertising, promotions, samples and trade shows. We expect sales and marketing costs to increase as we scale-up our domestic and international commercial efforts to expand our customer base.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses primarily include expenses related to the development of our NexGen instrument and related test menu. These expenses also include certain clinical study expenses incurred in preparation for FDA clearance for these products, intellectual property prosecution and maintenance costs, and quality assurance expenses. These expenses primarily consist of salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation costs, outside design and consulting services, laboratory supplies, contract research organization expenses, clinical study supplies and facility costs. We expense all research and development costs in the periods in which they are incurred. We expect research and development costs to increase as we complete development of our NexGen system and invest in expanding its related test menu.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses include expenses related to our executive, accounting and finance, compliance, information technology, legal, facilities, human resource, administrative and investor relations activities. These expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation costs, independent auditor costs, legal fees, consultants, travel, insurance, and public company expenses, such as stock transfer agent fees and listing fees for NASDAQ.
Foreign Exchange Gains and Losses
Transactions in currencies other than our functional currency are translated at the prevailing rates on the dates of the applicable transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses arise from differences in exchange rates during the period between the date a transaction denominated in a foreign currency is consummated and the date on which it is settled or translated. Prior to our initial public offering in 2010, exchange gains and losses included those arising on cash balances held by Osmetech denominated in currencies other than its functional currency, the British Pound. Since the initial public offering, the functional currency of GenMark has been the U.S. dollar.
Interest Income and Interest Expense
Interest income includes interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and investments. Interest expense represents interest incurred on our loan payable and on other liabilities.
Provision for Income Taxes
We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.
We assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. We consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income, and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for our valuation allowance. If it is more likely than not that we will not recover our deferred tax assets, we will increase our provision for income taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable.
Our income tax returns are based on calculations and assumptions that are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. While we believe we have appropriate support for the positions taken on our tax returns, we regularly assess the potential outcomes of examinations by tax authorities in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjust the income tax provision, income taxes payable and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
Results of Operations — Three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Revenue | $ | 7,913 |
| | $ | 11,101 |
| | $ | (3,188 | ) | | (29 | )% |
Our product revenue consists primarily of revenue from the sale of reagents and test cartridges (consumables) with a small component due to our sale of instruments and other revenue. Revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 decreased by $3,188,000, or 29%, compared to the same quarter of 2013, due to lower consumable revenues of $7,433,000 versus $10,806,000 in the comparable period ended March 31, 2013. This decrease in consumable revenue was primarily driven by a lack of purchases from Natural Molecular Testing Corporation, or NMTC, during the current period. Our base business, which excludes revenues attributable to NMTC, grew 84% to approximately $7,913,000 in the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with $4,312,000 in the same period of 2013. Reagent revenue during the current quarter from the Company's base business increased by 85% over the prior year period. The increase in revenue from our base business during the current quarter compared to the same period last year was primarily attributable to a significant increase in the purchase of our infectious disease assays. Pricing changes did not have an impact on revenue during the quarter.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Cost of Revenue | $ | 3,710 |
| | $ | 5,034 |
| | $ | (1,324 | ) | | (26 | )% |
Gross Profit | $ | 4,203 |
| | $ | 6,067 |
| | $ | (1,864 | ) | | (31 | )% |
The decrease in cost of revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2013 was primarily related to the decrease in consumable revenues in the current period. Decreases in our cost of revenue were primarily attributable to decreased standard product costs of $1,364,000, lower headcount and temporary labor costs of $412,000, lower royalties and license amortization expense of $52,000, and lower inventory reserve expense of $107,000. We incurred higher instrument depreciation, warranty and repair costs of $112,000, reagent warranty expense of $23,000 and reduced benefit from manufacturing efficiencies of $105,000. The decrease in gross profit of $1,864,000 was primarily due to decreased sales volumes.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Sales and Marketing | $ | 2,979 |
| | $ | 2,359 |
| | $ | 620 |
| | 26 | % |
The increase of $620,000 in sales and marketing expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, was primarily driven by an increase in personnel related costs of $706,000, including stock-based compensation expense of $203,000, incurred in connection with our commitment to build our global commercial team. This increase was primarily offset by a decrease in professional marketing support services of $205,000.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | $ Change | | % Change |
General and Administrative | $ | 2,814 |
| | $ | 2,558 |
| | $ | 256 |
| | 10 | % |
General and administrative expense increased $256,000 to $2,814,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $2,558,000 for the same period last year. The overall increase was primarily due to stock-based compensation expense of $341,000, employee related costs of $128,000, and software maintenance and other fees of $67,000, offset by a decrease in professional fees of $334,000 paid for accounting and auditing related support.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Research and Development | $ | 7,270 |
| | $ | 5,381 |
| | $ | 1,889 |
| | 35 | % |
The increase in research and development expense of $1,889,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, was primarily due to increased NexGen platform and assay development expenses of $1,417,000 and $809,000, respectively, which were partially offset by a decrease in professional fees for software development of $346,000. Overall increases in research and development were attributable to increases in headcount to support the development of our NexGen system.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Other Income (Expense) | $ | 83 |
| | $ | 63 |
| | $ | 20 |
| | 32 | % |
Other income (expense) represents non-operating income and expense, including, but not limited to, earnings on cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, interest expense related to debt, and capital leases. The change in other income (expense) for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, was due primarily to an increase in interest earned on marketable securities of $209,000, offset by amortization expense of $197,000 from related investment activity.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Provision for Income Taxes | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | 1 |
| | 14 | % |
Due to net losses incurred, we have only recorded tax provisions related to interest on uncertain tax positions and minimum tax payments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
To date, we have funded our operations primarily from the sale of our common stock, borrowings and cash from operations. We have incurred net losses from continuing operations each year and have not yet achieved profitability. At March 31, 2014, we had $92,534,000 of working capital, including $97,676,000 in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, |
Three months ended (in thousands): | 2014 | | 2013 |
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (6,384 | ) | | $ | (6,104 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,439 | ) | | (12,947 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (17 | ) | | (182 | ) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (7,840 | ) | | $ | (19,233 | ) |
Cash flows used in operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities increased $280,000 to $6,384,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $6,104,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The increased use of cash during the first three months of 2014 was primarily due to an increase in our net loss of $4,608,000, offset by increases in stock-based compensation of $692,000, and decreases in accounts receivable of $1,485,000, inventories of $1,700,000, and other assets of $223,000.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $11,508,000 to net cash used of $1,439,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $12,947,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to increases in proceeds from sales of marketable securities of $3,499,000 and maturity of short-term investments of $7,250,000.
Cash flows used in financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $165,000 to net cash used of $17,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $182,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, due to a decrease of principal repayment of borrowings of $245,000 offset by a decrease in the proceeds from stock option exercises of $80,000.
We have prepared cash flow forecasts which indicate, based on our current cash resources available, that we will have sufficient resources to fund our business for at least the next 12 months. We expect capital outlays and operating expenditures to increase over the next several years as we grow our customer base and revenues, and expand our research and development, commercialization and manufacturing activities. Factors that could affect our capital requirements, in addition to those previously identified, include, but are not limited to:
| |
• | the level of revenues and the rate of our revenue growth; |
| |
• | change in demand from our customers; |
| |
• | the level of expenses required to expand our commercial (sales and marketing) activities; |
| |
• | the level of research and development investment required to develop our NexGen system and related test menu and maintain our XT-8 system; |
| |
• | our need to acquire or license complementary technologies; |
| |
• | the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights; |
| |
• | competing technological and market developments; and |
| |
• | changes in regulatory policies or laws that affect our operations. |
On August 19, 2013, we completed the public offering of 8,765,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $9.84 per share and raised approximately $80,672,000 in net proceeds.
Although we do not currently anticipate requiring additional capital, if additional capital is required, we cannot be certain that it will be available when needed or that our actual cash requirements will not be greater than anticipated. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders could be significantly diluted, and these newly issued securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If we obtain additional debt financing, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness, and the terms of the debt securities issued could impose significant restrictions on our operations. If we raise additional funds through collaborations and licensing arrangements, we may be required to relinquish significant rights to our technologies or products, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.
In September 2012, we entered into a term loan with Banc of California, consisting of the following two loans.
1) We increased the letter of credit provided to our landlord of our Carlsbad, California facility to $758,000 from the previous letter of credit of $500,000. The increase in the letter of credit was required by our landlord in connection with our lease of additional space at this facility. This letter of credit was secured with $758,000 of restricted cash at March 31, 2014.
2) We obtained a variable rate term loan from Banc of California in the amount of $836,000 with an initial interest rate of 3.75% that expired in July 2013. As of December 31, 2013, we had repaid all outstanding amounts under this loan.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to doubtful accounts, inventories, valuation of intangibles and other long-term assets, income taxes, and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and there have been no material changes to such policies or estimates during the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements. We have provided a $758,000 standby letter of credit to our landlord as security for future rent in connection the lease of our Carlsbad, California facility, which is recorded as restricted cash on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
| |
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
There have been no material changes in our market risks during the quarter ended March 31, 2014.
Our exposure to market risk is limited to our cash and cash equivalents, all of which have maturities of less than three months, and short-term investments, which have maturities of less than one year. The goals of our investment policy are preservation of capital, fulfillment of liquidity needs and fiduciary control of cash and investments. We also seek to maximize income from our investments without assuming significant risk. To achieve our goals, we may in the future maintain a portfolio of cash equivalents and investments in a variety of securities that management believes to be of high credit quality. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Because of the short-term maturities of our cash equivalents and short-term investments, we do not believe that an increase in market rates would have a material negative impact on the value of our portfolio.
Interest Rate Risk
As of March 31, 2014, based on current interest rates and total borrowings outstanding, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would have an insignificant pre-tax impact on our results of operations.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risks
All of our operating facilities are located within the United States. We are a U.S. entity and our functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Virtually all of our revenues are based in the United States. In 2010, we entered into a license agreement that required payment in Euros, which is now terminated, and a small portion of our expenses in the first quarter of 2010 relating to our corporate office were transacted in British Pounds. Although we incorporated our Swiss subsidiary, GenMark Diagnostics Europe GmbH, in the first quarter of 2014, we currently have no material operations outside of the United States, which significantly diminishes the extent of any foreign currency exchange risk we currently face.
| |
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods and accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of management, concluded that, as of March 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the quarterly period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
We are from time to time subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that there are currently no claims or legal actions that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors during the three months ended March 31, 2014. For additional information regarding risk factors, refer to Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
| |
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None.
| |
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
| |
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
None.
None.
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index are incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | | GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC. |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: | May 6, 2014 | By: | /s/ Hany Massarany |
| | | Hany Massarany |
| | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: | May 6, 2014 | By: | /s/ Richard B. Slansky |
| | | Richard B. Slansky |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| | | |
EXHBIT INDEX
Listed and indexed below are all Exhibits filed as part of this report.
|
| |
Exhibit | Description |
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-165562) filed with the Commission on March 19, 2010). |
3.2 | Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-165562) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2010). |
10.1 | The GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. 2014 Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 11, 2014).† |
10.2 | Form of Amendment of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit and/or Stock Option Agreement(s).† |
10.3 | Employment Offer Letter dated April 1, 2013 by and between Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc., d.b.a. GenMark Diagnostics and Ingo Chakravarty.† |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. §1350. |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
† | Management compensation plan. |