2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Notes | |
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
Basis of Accounting |
|
The accompanying financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
|
Presentation of Financial Statements |
|
The prior periods' financial statements were presented as a development stage enterprise which required the labeling of the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, the presentation of certain inception to date information and a description of the development stage activities. In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-10. This ASU removed from the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) the previously mentioned requirements. ASU 2014-10 was effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 5, 2014, with earlier application permitted. The Company early adopted this ASU in the preparation of its December 31, 2014 and the two years then ended financial statements. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement,” specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs). In accordance with ASC 820, the following summarizes the fair value hierarchy: |
|
Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities in an active market that the Company has the ability to access. |
|
Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. |
|
Level 3 Inputs – Inputs based on prices or valuation techniques that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurements. |
|
ASC 820 requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurements. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. As of December 31, 2014 and December, 2013, none of the Company’s assets and liabilities were required to be reported at fair value on a recurring basis. Carrying values of accounts payable and notes payable approximate their fair values due to the short term nature of these financial instruments. There were no changes in methods or assumptions during the periods presented. |
|
Risks and Uncertainties |
|
The Company’s continued existence and future are dependent in a large part on its ability to develop its business model, commence operations and achieve profitability. The Company's operations are subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial and operational risks and the potential risk of business failure. The Company has been and continues to be totally dependent on the support of its major stockholder. The Company’s inability to commence operations and achieve profitability could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. |
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
|
The Company computes net income (loss) per common share in accordance with FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“ASC 260”) and SEC SAB 98. Under the provisions of ASC 260 and SAB 98, basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted income per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the effect of any dilutive shares outstanding during the period. Accordingly, the number of weighted average shares outstanding as well as the amount of net income (loss) per share are presented for basic and diluted per share calculations for all periods reflected in the accompanying statements of operations. There were no dilutive shares outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Section 740, “Income Taxes”, which requires the recognition of deferred income taxes for differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences for those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for operating losses that are available to offset future taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. |
|
ASC 740 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position would be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company does not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
There are no recent accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. |