must comply, including the following two financial maintenance tests (each of the capitalized terms as defined in the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreements):
| • | | a total leverage ratio (Total Debt to Adjusted EBITDA) of no greater than 7.50 to 1.00 for the four fiscal quarters following the consummation of the Transactions, stepping down to 6.00 to 1.00 thereafter (with a further step up to 7.50 to 1.00 if ATC consummates a Qualified Acquisition (as defined in the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreements)); and |
| • | | a senior secured leverage ratio (Senior Secured Debt to Adjusted EBITDA) of no greater than 3.00 to 1.00 for ATC and its subsidiaries. |
Any failure to comply with the financial and operating covenants of the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreements may constitute a default, which could result in, among other things, the amounts outstanding, including all accrued interest and unpaid fees, becoming immediately due and payable.
The foregoing description is only a summary of certain provisions of the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreements and is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreements, which are incorporated herein by reference. We have filed copies of the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreements as Exhibits (b)(5) and (b)(6) to the Schedule TO.
Bridge Facility
On November 14, 2021, ATC entered into a debt commitment letter and certain related letters (collectively, the “Bridge Commitment Letter”) with JPM (and, together with any lenders that become parties to the Bridge Commitment Letter, the “Commitment Parties”), in respect of the Bridge Facility. The interest rate for borrowings under the Bridge Facility would be, if effective before January 1, 2022, at the option of ATC, (i) the London interbank offered rate or (ii) an alternate base rate, plus, in each case, a spread based on ATC’s senior unsecured debt rating. The Bridge Facility would contain certain reporting, information, financial and operating covenants and other restrictions (including limitations on additional debt, guaranties, sales of assets and liens) with which ATC and its subsidiaries must comply. The Bridge Facility would also include financial maintenance tests substantially consistent with those in the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreements described above.
The commitments of the Commitment Parties were conditioned upon, among other things, the consummation of the Transactions, absence of a material adverse effect with respect to CoreSite, accuracy in all material respects of certain representations and warranties and delivery of certain financial statements.
Effective December 8, 2021, the Bridge Commitment Letter was fully terminated as a result of the $10.5 billion in committed amounts available under the 2021 Multicurrency Credit Facility, the 2021 Credit Facility, the 2019 Term Loan and the 2021 USD Delayed Draw Term Loans, as described above. ATC did not make any borrowings with respect to the commitments under the Bridge Commitment Letter.
The foregoing summary of the Bridge Commitment Letter does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Bridge Commitment Letter, which is incorporated herein by reference. We previously filed a copy of the Bridge Commitment Letter as Exhibit (b)(1) to the Schedule TO.”
Section 15 (“Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals”) of the Offer to Purchase is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing in its entirety the subsection titled “Legal Proceedings Relating to the Tender Offer” on page 51 to read as follows:
“Legal Proceedings Relating to the Tender Offer. On November 30, 2021, a complaint was filed by a purported stockholder of CoreSite regarding the Mergers. The complaint, filed on an individual basis by the plaintiff in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, was captioned O’Dell v. CoreSite Realty Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-10156 (S.D.N.Y). That complaint was subsequently voluntarily dismissed and re-filed on December 3, 2021 by the same plaintiff in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, and is captioned O’Dell v. CoreSite Realty Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01709 (D. Del.) (the “O’Dell Complaint”). The O’Dell Complaint names as defendants CoreSite and each member of the CoreSite Board. On December 2, 2021, another complaint was filed by a purported stockholder of CoreSite regarding the Mergers. The complaint, filed on an individual basis by the plaintiff, is captioned Ciccotelli v. CoreSite Realty Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01702 (D. Del.) (the “Ciccotelli Complaint”). The Ciccotelli Complaint names as defendants CoreSite, the OP, each member of the CoreSite Board, ATC, Parent, Holdco, Purchaser and OP Merger Sub. On December 6, 2021, another complaint was filed by a purported stockholder of CoreSite regarding the Mergers. The complaint, filed on an individual basis by the plaintiff, is captioned Schwartz v. CoreSite Realty Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-10404 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Schwartz Complaint”). The Schwartz Complaint names as defendants CoreSite and each member of the CoreSite Board. On December 8, 2021, another complaint was filed by a purported stockholder of CoreSite regarding the Mergers. The complaint, filed on an individual basis by the plaintiff, is captioned Kubicek v. CoreSite Realty Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03292 (D. Colo.) (the “Kubicek Complaint”). The Kubicek Complaint names as defendants CoreSite and each member of the CoreSite Board. On December 8, 2021, another complaint was filed by a purported stockholder of CoreSite regarding the Mergers. The complaint, filed on an individual basis by the plaintiff, is captioned Kent v. CoreSite Realty Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03294 (D. Colo.) (the “Kent Complaint”). The Kent Complaint names as defendants CoreSite and each member of the CoreSite Board. On December 9, 2021, another complaint was filed by a purported