Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements, presented in U.S. dollars, have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and represent the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Third-party equity interests in the Operating Partnership and a consolidated variable interest entity, Copper Beech at Ames, LLC, are reflected as non-controlling interests in the consolidated financial statements. The Company also has interests in unconsolidated real estate ventures which have ownership in several property owning entities that are accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation, primarily related to discontinued operations associated with the asset dispositions discussed in Note 7. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Reclassifications |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company reclassified its development and construction services companies as discontinued operations due to its strategic repositioning initiatives (see Note 4). Accordingly, the Company has reclassified the results of these operations to “Income (loss) from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. The development and construction services companies were included within the development, construction and management services segment in the Company’s prior year consolidated financial statements. |
|
In December 2013, the Company sold four wholly-owned properties: The Grove at Jacksonville, Alabama, The Grove at Jonesboro, Arkansas, The Grove at Wichita, Kansas, and The Grove at Wichita Falls, Texas. These four properties were included within the student housing operations segment in the prior year consolidated financial statements. Prior period amounts related to the December 2013 asset dispositions have also been reclassified as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant assumptions and estimates are used by management in recognizing construction and development revenue (which is included in income (loss) from discontinued operations) under the percentage of completion method, useful lives of student housing properties, valuation of investment in real estate and investments in unconsolidated entities and land and property held for sale, initial valuation and underlying allocation of purchase price to newly acquired student housing properties, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, determination of fair value for impairment assessments, determination of the effect of not exercising the Copper Beech option, fair value of guarantee obligations related to unconsolidated entities, allowance for doubtful accounts, insurance proceeds receivable from damaged assets, fair value of the debt and equity components of the exchangeable notes at the date of issuances and the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, including derivatives. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts and such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the periods in which they occur. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investment In Real Estate [Policy Text Block] | Investment in Real Estate and Depreciation |
|
Investment in real estate is recorded at historical cost. Major improvements that extend the life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated over a period equal to the shorter of the life of the improvement or the remaining useful life of the asset. The cost of ordinary repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: |
|
Land improvements | 15 years | | | | | | | | | |
Buildings and leasehold improvements | 10-40 years | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 5-10 years | | | | | | | | | |
|
The cost of buildings and improvements includes all pre-development, entitlement and project costs directly associated with the development and construction of a real estate project, which include interest, property taxes and the amortization of deferred financing costs recognized while the project is under construction, as well as certain internal costs related to the development and construction of the Company’s student housing properties. All costs are capitalized as development in process until the asset is ready for its intended use, which is typically at the completion of the project. Interest totaling approximately $6.3 million, $3.3 million, and $2.4 million was capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 respectively. |
|
The Company capitalizes costs during the development of assets beginning with the determination that development of a future asset is probable until the asset, or a portion of the asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use. During development efforts, the Company capitalizes all direct costs and indirect costs that have been incurred as a result of the development. These costs include interest and related loan fees, property taxes as well as other direct and indirect costs. The Company capitalizes interest costs for debt incurred for project specific financing and for capital contributions to equity method investees who utilize such funds for construction-related activities. Indirect project costs, which include personnel, office and administrative costs that are clearly associated with the Company’s development and redevelopment efforts, are capitalized. Indirect costs not clearly related to the acquisition, development, redevelopment and construction activity, including general and administrative expenses, are expensed in the period incurred. Capitalized indirect costs associated with the Company’s development activities were $10.8 million, $9.0 million, and $7.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. All such costs are capitalized as development in process until the asset is delivered and ready for its intended use, which is typically at the completion of the project. Upon completion, costs are transferred into the applicable asset category and depreciation commences. |
|
Pre-development costs are capitalized when they are directly identifiable with the specific property and would be capitalized if the property were already acquired and acquisition of the property or an option to acquire the property is probable. Capitalized pre-development costs are expensed when management believes it is no longer probable that a contract will be executed and/or construction will commence. Because the Company frequently incurs these pre-development expenditures before a financing commitment and/or required permits and authorizations have been obtained, the Company will bear the risk of loss of these pre-development expenditures if financing cannot ultimately be arranged on acceptable terms or the Company is unable to successfully obtain the required permits and authorizations. As such, management evaluates the status of projects where the Company has not yet acquired the target property or where the Company has not yet commenced construction on a periodic basis and write-off any pre-development costs related to projects whose current status indicates the acquisition or commencement of construction is not probable. In 2013 and 2012, such write-offs are included within income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). In 2014, such write-offs were included within impairment of land and pre-development costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had no capitalized pre-development costs related to development projects for which construction had not commenced and as of December 31, 2013, the Company deferred approximately $10.5 million in pre-development costs related to development projects for which construction had not commenced (see Note 4). As of December 31, 2014, the Company owned four strategically held land parcels that could be used for the development of four phase two properties with an aggregate bed count ranging from approximately 1,000 to 1,500 (unaudited), and twelve additional land parcels, six of which were sold in January 2015, with the remaining parcels expected to be sold during 2015. The costs associated with the four strategically held land parcels are included in land held for investment on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The costs associated with the parcels in which the Company intends to divest are included in land held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Management assesses whether there has been impairment in the value of the Company’s investment in real estate whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of investment in real estate is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of a student housing property to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the property over the expected hold period. Impairment is recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows, including proceeds from disposition, are less than the carrying value of the property. The estimation of future undiscounted cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions regarding current and future economic and market conditions. If such conditions change, then an adjustment reducing the carrying value of the Company’s long-lived assets could occur in the future period in which conditions change. To the extent that a property is impaired, the excess of the carrying amount of the property over its estimated fair value is recorded as an impairment charge. Fair value is determined based upon the discounted cash flows of the property, quoted market prices or independent appraisals, as considered necessary. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Property Acquisition [Policy Text Block] | Property Acquisitions |
|
Campus Crest allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities based on the fair values of these assets and liabilities for both consolidated entities and investments in unconsolidated entities. Fair value estimates are based on information obtained from independent appraisals, market data, information obtained during due diligence and information related to the marketing and leasing at the specific property. The value of in-place leases is based on the difference between (i) the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and (ii) the property valued “as-if” vacant. As lease terms are typically one year or less, rates on in-place leases generally approximate market rental rates. Factors considered in the valuation of in-place leases include an estimate of the carrying costs during the expected lease-up period considering current market conditions, nature of the tenancy and costs to execute similar leases. Carrying costs include estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, net of variable operating expenses. The value of in-place leases is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining initial term of the respective leases, generally less than one year. The purchase price of property acquisitions is not expected to be allocated to tenant relationships, considering the terms of the leases and the expected levels of renewals. |
|
Additionally, mortgage debt premiums and discounts represent fair value adjustments for the difference between the stated rates and market rates of mortgage debt assumed in connection with the Company’s acquisitions. The mortgage debt premiums and discounts are amortized to interest expense of the respective investee over the term of the related mortgage loans using the effective-interest method. The fair value debt and purchase accounting adjustments included in equity in earnings (loss) related to Copper Beech were approximately $6.5 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Acquisition-related costs such as due diligence, legal, accounting and advisory fees are either expensed as incurred for acquisitions that are consolidated or capitalized for acquisitions accounted for under the equity method of accounting. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Long-Lived Assets – Held for Sale |
|
Long-lived assets to be disposed of are classified as held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met: |
|
| a. | Management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the assets. | | | | | | | | |
|
| b. | The asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets. | | | | | | | | |
|
| c. | An active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated. | | | | | | | | |
|
| d. | The sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year. | | | | | | | | |
|
| e. | The asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value. | | | | | | | | |
|
| f. | Actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plans will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. | | | | | | | | |
|
Concurrent with this classification, the land and property held for sale is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs, and depreciation ceases. As discussed in more detail in Note 4, the Company reduced the carrying amount of land and properties held for sale to their estimated fair value less estimated selling costs which resulted in an impairment charge. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Ground Leases [Policy Text Block] | Ground Leases |
|
Ground lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | In-Place Lease Intangible Assets |
|
In-place lease intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining term of the underlying leases, typically one year or less. Amortization expense was approximately $1.5 million, $0.7 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The amortization of intangible assets is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash |
|
Campus Crest considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash is excluded from cash for the purpose of preparing the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company maintains cash balances in various banks. At times the Company’s balances may exceed the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company does not believe this presents significant exposure for the business. |
|
Restricted cash includes escrow accounts held by lenders for the purpose of paying taxes, insurance and funding capital improvements. The Company’s funds in escrow are typically held in interest bearing accounts covered under FDIC insurance with applicable limits. At December 31, 2013, we held approximately $28.2 million with a qualified intermediary to facilitate a tax deferred Section 1031 like-kind exchange in conjunction with the disposition of four properties (see Note 7). Our funds in escrow are typically held in interest bearing accounts covered under FDIC insurance with applicable limits. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred Financing Costs [Policy Text Block] | Deferred Financing Costs |
|
Campus Crest defers costs incurred in obtaining financing and amortizes these costs using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, over the expected terms of the related loans. Deferred financing costs as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $11.7 million and $11.0 million, respectively, and accumulated amortization was approximately $4.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Upon repayment of the underlying debt agreement, any unamortized costs are charged to earnings. Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, are included in other assets |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Noncontrolling Interests [Policy Text Block] | Noncontrolling Interests |
|
Noncontrolling interests represent the portion of equity in the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries which are not attributable to the Company’s stockholders. Accordingly, noncontrolling interests are reported as a component of equity, separate from stockholders’ equity, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), operating results are reported at their consolidated amounts, including both the amount attributable to the Company and to noncontrolling interests. See also “Consolidated Variable Interest Entity.” |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Real Estate Ventures |
|
Campus Crest holds interests in its properties, both under development and in operation, through interests in both consolidated and unconsolidated real estate ventures. The Company assesses its investments in real estate ventures to determine if a venture is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). Generally, an entity is determined to be a VIE when either (1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest, (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and substantially all of the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately fewer voting rights. The Company consolidates entities that are VIEs for which the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary. In instances where the Company is not the primary beneficiary, the Company does not consolidate the entity for financial reporting purposes. The primary beneficiary is the entity that has both (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Entities that are not defined as VIEs are consolidated where the Company is the general partner (or the equivalent) and the limited partners (or the equivalent) in such investments do not have rights which would preclude control. |
|
For entities where the Company is the general partner (or the equivalent), but do not control the real estate venture, and the other partners (or the equivalent) hold substantive participating rights, the Company uses the equity method of accounting. For entities where the Company is a limited partner (or the equivalent), management considers factors such as ownership interest, voting control, authority to make decisions and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners (or the equivalent) to determine if the presumption that the general partner controls the entity is overcome. In instances where these factors indicate the Company controls the entity, the Company would consolidate the entity; otherwise the Company accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. |
|
Under the equity method of accounting, investments are initially recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at cost and are subsequently adjusted to reflect the Company’s proportionate share of net earnings or losses of the entity, distributions received, contributions and certain other adjustments, as appropriate. Any difference between the carrying amount of these investments on the Company’s balance sheet and the underlying equity in net assets is amortized as an adjustment to equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities. When circumstances indicate there may have been a loss in value of an equity method investment, and the Company determines the loss in value is other than temporary, the Company recognizes an impairment charge to reflect the investment at fair value (see Note 4). |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Segments |
|
The Company has identified two reportable business segments: (i) student housing operations and (ii) property management services. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating income (loss). All inter-segment sales pricing is based on current market conditions. Unallocated corporate amounts include general expenses associated with managing the Company’s two reportable operating segments. Prior to the third quarter of 2014, the Company’s segments consisted of student housing operations and construction, development and management services. Upon discontinuation of the construction and development operations of the business, the Company identified its two segments as student housing operations and property management services. All construction and development activities are reported in discontinued operations at December 31, 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Student Housing Revenue [Policy Text Block] | Student Housing Revenue |
|
Students are required to execute lease contracts with payment schedules that vary from annual to monthly payments. The Company recognizes revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease contracts which for new tenants is typically 11.5 months and for renewing tenants is typically 12 months. Generally, unless sufficient income can be verified, each executed contract is required to be accompanied by a signed parental/guardian guaranty. Amounts received in advance of the occupancy period or prior to the contractual due date are recorded as deferred revenues and included in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Property Management Services [Policy Text Block] | Property Management Services |
|
Management fees are recognized when earned in accordance with each management contract. Incentive management fees are recognized when the incentive criteria are met. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Development Construction And Management Services [Policy Text Block] | Development and Construction Services |
|
Development and construction service revenue is recognized using the percentage of completion method, as determined by construction costs incurred relative to total estimated construction costs for each property under development and construction. For the purpose of applying this method, significant estimates are necessary to determine the percentage of completion as of the balance sheet date. This method is used because management considers total cost to be the best measure of progress toward completion of the contract. Any changes in significant judgments and/or estimates used in determining construction and development revenue could significantly change the timing or amount of construction and development revenue recognized. |
|
Development and construction service revenue is recognized for contracts with entities the Company does not consolidate. For projects where revenue is based on a fixed price, any cost overruns incurred during construction, as compared to the original budget, will reduce the net profit ultimately recognized on those projects. Profit derived from these projects is eliminated to the extent of the Company’s interest in the unconsolidated entity. Any incentive fees, net of the impact of the Company’s ownership interest if the entity is unconsolidated, are recognized when the project is complete and performance has been agreed upon by all parties, or when performance has been verified by an independent third party. When total development or construction costs at completion exceed the fixed price set forth within the related contract, such cost overruns are recorded as additional investment in the unconsolidated entity. Entitlement fees and arrangement fees, where applicable, are recognized when earned based on the terms of the related contracts. |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings represents the excess of construction costs and profits recognized to date using the percentage of completion method over billings to date on certain contracts. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings represents the excess of billings to date over the amount of contract costs and profits recognized to date using the percentage of completion method on certain contracts. Total billings to date on such contracts totaled $49.3 million and $51.3 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company expects to bill and collect the cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings in 2015. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance For Doubtful Accounts [Policy Text Block] | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
Allowances for student receivables are maintained to reduce the Company’s receivables to the amount that management estimates to be collectible, which approximates fair value. The allowance is estimated based on past due balances not received on contractual terms, as well as historical collections experience and current economic and business conditions. When management has determined that receivables are uncollectible, they are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Recoveries of accounts previously written off are recorded when received. |
|
The allowance for doubtful accounts is summarized as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 539 | | $ | 121 | | $ | 246 | |
Charged to expense | | | 3,249 | | | 3,432 | | | 1,728 | |
Write-offs | | | -3,329 | | | -2,433 | | | -1,853 | |
Sale of properties | | | - | | | -581 | | | - | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 459 | | $ | 539 | | $ | 121 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Marketing and Advertising Costs [Policy Text Block] | Marketing and Advertising Costs |
|
Marketing and advertising costs are expensed during the period incurred and included in student housing and general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Marketing and advertising expenses were $1.5 million, $1.5 million, and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
|
Campus Crest enters into interest rate cap and interest rate swap agreements to manage floating interest rate exposure with respect to amounts borrowed, or forecasted to be borrowed, under credit facilities. These contracts effectively exchange existing or forecasted obligations to pay interest based on floating rates for obligations to pay interest based on fixed rates. The Company had no interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2014. |
|
All derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at their respective fair values. Changes in fair value are recognized either in earnings or as other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether the derivative has been designated as a cash flow hedge and whether it qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, the nature of the exposure being hedged and how effective the derivative is at offsetting movements in underlying exposure. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when: (i) it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; or (iv) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. In situations in which hedge accounting is not initially designated, or is discontinued and a derivative remains outstanding, gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded in current period earnings as a component of other income (expense) line item on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the fair value of derivative contracts was insignificant. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Commitments and Contingencies |
|
Liabilities for loss contingencies, arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, penalties and other sources, are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes |
|
The Company has made an election to qualify, and believes it is operating so as to qualify, as a REIT under Sections 856 through 859 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company’s qualification as a REIT depends upon its ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual investment and operating results, various complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code relating to, among other things, the sources of the Company’s gross income, the composition and values of the Company’s assets, the Company’s distribution levels and the diversity of ownership of its stock. The Company believes that it is organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and that the Company’s intended manner of operation will enable it to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. |
|
As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on taxable income that it distributes currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates and generally will be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year during which it lost its REIT qualification. Accordingly, the Company’s failure to qualify as a REIT could materially and adversely affect the Company, including its ability to make distributions to its stockholders in the future. |
|
Campus Crest has made the election to treat TRS Holdings, the Company’s subsidiary which holds the Company’s management companies (as well as the development and construction companies included within discontinued operations) that provide services to entities in which the Company does not own 100% of the equity interests, as a TRS. As a TRS, the operations of TRS Holdings and its subsidiaries are generally subject to federal, state and local income and franchise taxes. The Company’s TRS accounts for its income taxes in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which includes an estimate of the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities of the TRS entities are recognized based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. |
|
Campus Crest follows a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when the Company concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. De-recognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when the Company subsequently determines a tax position no longer met the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. The use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for de-recognition of tax positions is prohibited. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), which consists of unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive income (loss) is presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is displayed as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock Issuance Costs [Policy Text Block] | Common Stock Issuances and Costs |
|
Specific incremental costs directly attributable to the Company’s equity offerings are deferred and charged against the gross proceeds of the offering. As such, underwriting commissions and other common stock issuance costs are reflected as a reduction of additional paid in capital. See Note 13 for an expanded discussion on common stock issuances and costs. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company grants restricted stock and restricted Operating Partnership ("OP Unit”) awards that typically vest over either a three or five year period. A restricted stock or OP Unit award is an award of shares of the Company’s common stock or OP Units that are subject to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions determined by the Company’s compensation committee at the date of grant. A grant date generally is established for a restricted stock award or restricted OP Unit award upon approval from the Company’s compensation committee and Board of Directors. The restrictions may lapse over a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of pre-established criteria as the Company’s compensation committee may determine. Except to the extent restricted under the award agreement, a participant awarded restricted stock or OP Units has all the rights of a stockholder or OP Unit holder as to these shares or units, including the right to vote and the right to receive dividends or distributions on the shares or units. The fair value of the award generally is determined based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period for the entire award with cost recognized at the end of any period being at least equal to the shares that were then vested. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign Currency |
|
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in local currency at actual exchange rates at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet dates are reported at the rates of exchange prevailing at those dates. Any gains or losses arising on monetary assets and liabilities from a change in exchange rates subsequent to the date of the transaction have been included in discontinued operations, if resulting from operations within the Company’s development or construction service company, or other income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had foreign currency exposure to the Canadian dollar. The aggregate transaction gains and losses included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were not significant. |
|
The financial statements of certain equity method investees and certain foreign subsidiaries are translated from their respective functional currencies into U.S. dollars using current and historical exchange rates. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are reported separately and included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Upon classification as held for sale, sale or liquidation of the Company’s investments, the translation adjustment would be reported as part of the gain or loss on classification, sale or liquidation. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized a foreign currency translation loss of approximately $2.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to its investment in CSH Montreal, LP ("CSH Montreal”). Foreign currency translation loss is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and in comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Insurance Premiums Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Insurance Recoveries |
|
Insurance recoveries are amounts due or received under the Company’s applicable insurance policies for asset damage and business interruption relating to the previously disclosed fire at The Grove at Pullman, Washington and to the damage at The Grove at Wichita Kansas, and The Grove at Wichita Falls, Texas. Business interruption recovery is recorded when realized and included as a reduction within student housing operations expenses within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized approximately $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively of business interruption recovery. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a receivable for property damage of $5.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidation, Variable Interest Entity, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Consolidated Variable Interest Entity |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company entered into a variable interest entity ("VIE") with Copper Beech Townhome Communities, LLC ("CBTC") to develop, construct and manage a student housing property in Ames, Iowa (“Copper Beech at Ames”). The Company concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of Copper Beech at Ames as the Company funded all of the equity of this entity, resulting in the Copper Beech investor’s interest being deemed a de facto agent of Campus Crest. Therefore, the Company has consolidated the financial position and the results of operations of Copper Beech at Ames in the accompanying balance sheet, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The Company recorded $1.3 million and $0.5 million in revenues and expenses, respectively, related to the VIE for the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company recorded $33.5 million in assets, $22.3 million in liabilities, and $5.6 million of noncontrolling interests on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014. The creditors of the loan for Copper Beech at Ames do not have recourse to the assets of Campus Crest, nor is the Company required to provide financial support to Copper Beech at Ames. On January 30, 2015, in connection with the Copper Beech purchase transaction (see Note 19), the Company’s ownership interest in Copper Beech at Ames increased to a 100% interest. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Accounting Changes And Corrections [Policy Text Block] | Immaterial Correction |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company was made aware of a tax liability at one of its properties that extends back to the year ended December 31, 2009. The total impact of the tax liability is approximately $2.3 million, of which $0.4 million relates to 2014. The Company has adjusted the prior year consolidated financial statements presented herein to reflect the impact of this liability. For both the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, student housing operations expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) has been increased by approximately $0.4 million, and accumulated deficit and distributions on the accompanying consolidated statement of changes in equity as of December 31, 2011 has been increased by $1.1 million. In addition, accrued accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 was increased by $1.9 million. No changes in net cash provided by operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows resulted from the immaterial correction to prior periods. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810)", which amends the consolidation requirements in ASC 810, “Consolidation”. ASU 2015-02 affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments: (i) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities ("VIEs") or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, (iii) affect the consolidated analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships and (iv) provide a scope exception for certain entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance and the impact is not known. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, "Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360) - Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity" ("ASU 2014-08"). ASU 2014-08 changes the threshold for disclosing discontinued operations and the related disclosure requirements. Pursuant to ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift, such as a major line of business, a major geographical area or a major equity investment, should be presented as a discontinued operation. The guidance is to be applied prospectively to new disposals and new classifications of disposal groups as held for sale after the effective date. ASU 2014-08 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2014-08 as of January 1, 2014. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This ASU requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. |
| | | | | | | | | | |