As previously disclosed, on October 31, 2020, Nielsen Holdings plc (the “Company” or “Nielsen”), Indy US Bidco, LLC (“US Purchaser”) and Indy Dutch Bidco B.V. (“Dutch Purchaser”) (US Purchaser and Dutch Purchaser, collectively, “Purchaser”), entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which Purchaser will acquire the Company’s Global Connect business (such business, “Connect,” and the acquisition of Connect, the “Transaction”) by means of a sale of the equity interests of certain subsidiaries held by the Company which operate Connect.
On December 23, 2020, Nielsen filed a definitive proxy statement in connection with the Transaction (the “Proxy Statement”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
As of February 1, 2021, five lawsuits had been filed relating to the Transaction in federal and state courts, including one purported class action lawsuit, by purported Nielsen shareholders against Nielsen and the members of the Nielsen board of directors (collectively, the “Actions”). The cases are, in the order by which they were filed: Jeffrey Oram v. Nielsen Holdings plc, et al., 1:20-cv-10893 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2020), which was subsequently dismissed and re-filed as Jeffrey Oram v. Nielsen Holdings plc, et al., 1:21-cv-0067-UNA (D. Del. Jan. 21, 2021); Brian Levy v. Nielsen Holdings plc, et al., Index No. 66687/2020 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Dec. 29, 2020); Bryan Anderson v. Nielsen Holdings plc, et al., 1:21-cv-00374 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2021); Frank Gallo v. Nielsen Holdings plc, et al., 2:21-cv-00433 (C. D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2021); and Marc Waterman v. Nielsen Holdings plc. 2:21-cv-00319 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 22, 2021).
The Actions generally allege that the Proxy Statement misrepresents and/or omits certain purportedly material information and assert violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder or negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment in violation of New York common law and breach of duty of disclosure under the laws of England and Wales. The alleged material misstatements and omissions relate to, among other topics, certain forecasted financial information for Connect prepared by Nielsen’s management, the opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan”), Nielsen’s financial advisor, in connection with the Transaction, the interests of Nielsen’s directors and officers in the Transaction and certain background events that occurred in connection with the Transaction.
The plaintiffs in each of the Actions seek, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the Transaction or, in the alternative, rescission damages, as well as an award of costs and expenses (including attorneys’ and experts’ fees and expenses).
The Proxy Statement is modified and superseded by, and should be read as part of, and in conjunction with, the disclosures set forth in this Current Report on Form 8-K. To the extent that information in this Current Report on Form 8-K differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement, the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K shall supersede or modify the information in the Proxy Statement.
Supplemental Disclosures
Nielsen believes that no further disclosure is required to supplement the Proxy Statement under applicable law. Without admitting in any way that the disclosures below are material or required to be made, Nielsen makes the following supplemental disclosures in connection with its response to the Actions. In light of the supplemental disclosures, the plaintiffs in the Actions have agreed to dismiss the Actions in their entirety, with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs only and without prejudice to all other members of the putative class. Nothing in this supplement shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality of any of the disclosures set forth herein. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to those terms in the Proxy Statement. All page references are to the Proxy Statement. For clarity, new text within restated paragraphs from the Proxy Statement are highlighted with bold text.
The Proxy Statement is hereby amended and supplemented on page 25 by replacing the third paragraph under the section entitled “Strategic Review Process” with the following:
2