This Amendment No. 11 (this “Amendment”) to Schedule 14D-9 amends and supplements the Schedule 14D-9 previously filed by Wright Medical Group N.V., a public limited liability company organized under the laws of the Netherlands (the “Company”), with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 13, 2019 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Schedule 14D-9”), with respect to the tender offer made by Stryker B.V., a private company with limited liability organized under the laws of the Netherlands (“Purchaser”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Stryker Corporation, a Michigan corporation (“Stryker”), to purchase all of the outstanding ordinary shares, par value €0.03 per share, of the Company (the “Shares”) at a purchase price of $30.75 per Share without interest and less applicable withholding taxes, payable in cash to the holders thereof (such amount or any higher amount per Share paid pursuant to the Offer (as defined below), the “Offer Consideration”), on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated December 13, 2019 (the “Offer to Purchase”), and in the related Letter of Transmittal (the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, as each may be amended from time to time, the “Offer”). The Offer is described in a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (the “Schedule TO”) filed by Stryker and Purchaser with the SEC on December 13, 2019, and the Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal have been filed as Exhibits (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B) thereto, respectively, as each may be amended or supplemented from time to time.
Five complaints have been filed by purported shareholders of the Company alleging that the Schedule 14D-9 contains omissions and misrepresentations that render it false and misleading. On January 15, 2020, a purported shareholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Thompson v. Wright Medical Group N.V., et al, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-61, against the Company, the members of the Company’s board of directors, and Stryker and the Purchaser (the “Thompson Complaint”). The Thompson Complaint is filed with the Schedule 14D-9 as Exhibit No. (a)(5)(M). On January 31, 2020, another purported shareholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, captioned Grubb v. Wright Medical Group N.V., et al, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00553, against the Company and its board of directors (the “Grubb Complaint”). The Grubb Complaint is filed with the Schedule 14D-9 as Exhibit No. (a)(5)(N). On April 9, 2020, another purported shareholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Woodward v. Wright Medical Group N.V., et al., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-494, against the Company and its board of directors (the “Woodward Complaint”). On April 15, 2020, a purported shareholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Curtis v. Wright Medical Group N.V., et al. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00509, against the Company, the members of the Company’s board of directors, and Stryker and the Purchaser. On April 28, 2020, a purported shareholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Stein v. Wright Medical Group N.V., et al., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-582, against the Company, the members of the Company’s board of directors, and Stryker and the Purchaser. The complaints in these five cases allege that, among other things, the defendants violated Sections 14(e), 14(d), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as Rule 14d-9 promulgated thereunder, by omitting or misrepresenting certain allegedly material information from the Schedule 14D-9 in connection with the Offer. The complaints allege that these omissions and misrepresentations rendered the Schedule 14D-9 false and misleading. We refer to the five complaints collectively as the “Tender Offer Litigation.”
The Company believes the allegations and claims asserted in the Tender Offer Litigation are without merit and that supplemental disclosures are not required or necessary under applicable laws. However, in order to avoid the risk of the Tender Offer Litigation delaying or otherwise adversely affecting the transactions and to minimize the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in defending the Tender Offer Litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, the Company is hereby voluntarily amending and supplementing the Schedule 14D-9 as described in this Amendment. The Company denies that it has violated any laws or breached any duties to the Company’s shareholders. Nothing in this Amendment shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein.
The following supplemental disclosures will not affect the merger consideration to be received by shareholders of the Company in connection with the Offer or the timing of the Offer, which will expire at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on September 30, 2020 (the “Expiration Time,” unless the Offer is extended in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, in which event “Expiration Time” will mean the latest time and date at which the Offer, as so extended by Purchaser, will expire).
2