Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation |
|
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative United States GAAP as defined in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, T2 Biosystems Securities Corporation. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
|
Unaudited Interim Financial Information | Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
|
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statement have been condensed or omitted. Accordingly, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. |
|
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2015, the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related financial data and other information disclosed in these notes are unaudited. The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited annual financial statements, and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015, any other interim periods, or any future year or period. |
|
|
Segment Information | Segment Information |
|
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing the enterprise’s performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer. The Company views its operations and manages its business in one operating segment, which is the business of developing and launching commercially its diagnostic products aimed at reducing mortality rates, improving patient outcomes and reducing the cost of healthcare by helping medical professionals make targeted treatment decisions earlier. |
|
|
|
Net Loss Per Share | Net Loss Per Share |
|
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders, which is net loss plus accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value in the period, by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents outstanding for the period, determined using the treasury-stock method for outstanding stock options and warrants. For purposes of the diluted net loss per share calculation, redeemable convertible preferred stock, warrants to purchase redeemable convertible preferred stock and stock options are considered to be common stock equivalents, but have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share, as their effect, including the related impact to the numerator of the fair value adjustment of the warrant and the impact to the denominator of the warrant shares, would be anti-dilutive for all periods presented. Therefore, basic and diluted net loss per share applicable to common stockholders was the same for all periods presented. |
|
|
Guarantees | Guarantees |
|
From time to time, the Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, indemnification agreements with directors and officers, within its lease agreements for office, laboratory and manufacturing space, and with certain suppliers and business partners. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had not experienced any material losses related to these indemnification obligations, and no material claims with respect thereto were outstanding. The Company does not expect significant claims related to these indemnification obligations and, consequently, concluded that the fair value of these obligations is negligible, and no related reserves were established. |
|
|
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company generates revenue from product sales and research and development agreements with government agencies and other third parties. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”). Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: |
|
| i. | | Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists |
|
| ii. | | Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered |
|
| iii. | | The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable |
|
| iv. | | Collectability is reasonably assured |
|
Amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue. |
|
The Company offers customers the choice either to purchase a T2Dx outright or to receive possession of a T2Dx pursuant to a “reagent rental” agreement wherein, the Company retains title to the T2DX and earn revenue for the usage of the instrument and related maintenance services through the amount charged for reagents. |
|
Revenue earned from activities performed pursuant to research and development agreements is reported as research revenue in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss, using the proportional performance method as the work is completed, and the related costs are expensed as incurred as research and development expense. The timing of receipt of cash from the Company’s research and development agreements generally differs from when revenue is recognized. |
|
For multiple-element arrangements, the Company identifies the deliverables included within each agreement and evaluates which deliverables represent separate units of accounting. The Company accounts for those components as separate elements when the following criteria are met: (1) the delivered items have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis; and, (2) if there is a general right of return relative to the delivered items, delivery or performance of the undelivered items is considered probable and within its control. The consideration received is allocated among the separate units of accounting based on management’s best estimate of selling price, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate units. The determination that multiple elements in an arrangement meet the criteria for separate units of accounting requires the Company’s management to exercise its judgment. |
|
|
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements | Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements |
|
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies and adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations upon adoption. |
|
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). This standard amends existing guidance to require the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of a deferred charge. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2015-03 is applied retrospectively. The Company has not adopted the guidance prescribed by ASU 2015-03 and does not expect the new guidance to have a material effect on its condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance, ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which is applicable to revenue recognition that will be effective for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017. In April 2015, the FASB issued an exposure draft of a proposed ASU that would delay by one year the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard, or until the year ended December 31, 2018 for the Company, if ratified. The new guidance must be adopted using either a full retrospective approach for all periods presented or a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption prior to the original adoption date of ASU 2014-09 is not permitted. The new guidance applies a more principles-based approach to revenue recognition. The Company is evaluating the new guidance and the expected effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
|