Heritage Financial 10K 2011 Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

Commission File Number 000-51305

Heritage Financial Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		38-3814230
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

721 N. Westover Blvd., Albany, GA		31707
(Address of principal executive officers)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 229-420-0000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 per share		Nasdaq Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of each class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

o Large accelerated filer	x Accelerated filer
o Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	o Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes x No

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2011 was approximately $95.3 million, computed by reference to the last sales price for the registrant’s common stock on Nasdaq Global Market on that date.

As of March 15, 2012, there were 8,668,752 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of Form 10-K – Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Heritage Financial Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Heritage” or the “Company”), is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiary, HeritageBank of the South, a Georgia savings bank (“HeritageBank” or the “Bank”).

During 2011, we made two assisted transactions under loss-share agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), which significantly increased our asset size and deposit base and increased our central eastern Georgia market presence in and around the Savannah and the Statesboro markets. On February 18, 2011, we acquired Citizens Bank of Effingham headquartered in Springfield, Georgia with $139 million in loans and $206 million in deposits, and on August 19, 2011, we acquired First Southern National Bank headquartered in Statesboro, Georgia with $108 million in loans and $137 million in deposits. We also expanded our Georgia footprint in 2011 by opening mortgage production offices in Alpharetta, Gainesville, LaGrange and Macon.

The Company was formed by its federally chartered predecessor, Heritage Financial Group (the “Predecessor”) in connection with a second-step conversion and public offering conducted in the latter half of 2010, in which the Predecessor merged into the Company and converted from a mutual holding company structure to a stock holding company structure (“Conversion”). In that merger, each public share of common stock of the Predecessor was exchanged for 0.8377 shares of the Company’s common stock. Prior period shares and per share data, including dividends per share, included in the Form 10-K have been adjusted to reflect the 0.8377 exchange ratio. The words “we,” “our” and “us” in this Form 10-K refer to Heritage and HeritageBank on a consolidated basis and for periods prior to the closing of the second-step conversion on November 30, 2010, to the Predecessor and HeritageBank on a consolidated basis, unless indicated otherwise herein.

At December 31, 2011, we had total assets of $1.1 billion, loans of $560.6 million, deposits of $884.2 million and stockholders’ equity of $124.1 million. Our executive offices are located at 721 N. Westover Boulevard, Albany, Georgia 31707. Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “HBOS.” For more information about our business, see Item 7. - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – General.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors which are beyond our control. The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “should,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to those described below under “Risk Factors.”

Market Area

We intend to continue to be a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities we serve. We are headquartered in Albany, Georgia. At December 31, 2011, we primarily served southern Georgia through offices in the Albany Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”), Statesboro MSA, Savannah MSA, Valdosta MSA, Appling County (Baxley), Cook County (Adel), Jeff Davis County (Hazlehurst) and Tattnall County (Reidsville and Collins) and north central Florida through offices in the Ocala MSA and Lake City MSA. We occasionally make loans beyond our market area to meet customer needs and to develop new business.

The following table sets forth our deposit market share, including acquisitions, as of June 30, 2011, based on the most recent data available from the FDIC.

Market Area	Market Share	Market Share Rank	Institutions in Market

Albany, Georgia MSA	16.1%	1	16
Statesboro, Georgia MSA	20.8	3	8
Savannah, Georgia MSA	2.9	9	23
Valdosta, Georgia MSA	0.8	17	21
Adel, Georgia	21.6	2	5
Baxley, Georgia	10.8	5	5
Hazlehurst, Georgia	19.6	1	4
Tattnall County, Georgia	11.7	4	5
Ocala, Florida MSA	1.2	16	22
Lake City, Florida MSA	5.3	6	7

Information regarding the local economy, major employers, unemployment levels and recent and projected population growth in our 10 market areas is provided below. (The unemployment and demographic (population) data was obtained from the website of SNL Financial at www.snl.com. SNL Financial is a provider of news, financial data and analysis on the banking business.) Overall, these 10 market areas are experiencing higher unemployment levels than the nation or their respective states. As of December 2011, the national unemployment rate was 8.5%, and the rates in Georgia and Florida were 9.4% and 9.7%, respectively. However, the average unemployment rates for December 2011 in our eight Georgia market areas and our two Florida market areas were 10.3% and 10.6%, respectively. Our eight Georgia market areas experienced average population growth of 9.8% from 2000 to 2010 and are expected to experience average population growth of 3.8% over the next five years. Our two Florida market areas experienced average population growth of 28.6% from 2000 to 2010 and are expected to experience average population growth in our market areas of 8.6% over the next four years.

Southwest Georgia Market - Albany MSA. The Albany MSA was historically based on manufacturing and agriculture, but it has become more service-oriented in the last two decades. Median household income and per capita income are below the state and national averages, reflecting the rural nature of the market and limited availability of high paying white collar and technical jobs. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 9.9%, compared with 13.7% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the MSA include the Marine Corps Logistic Base, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Procter & Gamble, Teleperformance USA, Albany State University, Darton College, and MillerCoors Brewing Company. This MSA has a population of approximately 165,000. Population growth in this area has remained relatively flat, with a 4.6% growth from 2000 to 2010. Over the next four years, the population is expected to grow 1.5%.

South Central Georgia Market – Valdosta MSA. The Valdosta MSA is a traditional manufacturing and agriculture economy that has become more service-oriented in the last 20 years. Median household income levels are below the state and national averages, reflecting the rural economy and limited availability of higher paying white collar and technology jobs. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 8.6%, compared with 9.4% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include Moody Air Force Base, with approximately 6,000 personnel. Other major employers include South Georgia Medical Center, Lowe’s Home Centers, and Conversys Corporation. Valdosta is a regional hub for communities in south central Georgia. This market has a population of approximately 135,000. Population growth has been steady, growing 13.3% from 2000 to 2010, and is expected to grow by 5.2% over the next four years. A major reason for growth in this area has been Valdosta State University, which has approximately 12,000 full-time students.

Southeast Georgia Market – Statesboro MSA. The Statesboro MSA is a service-based economy. Median and household income levels are below the state and national averages. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 10.0%, compared with 12.1% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include Georgia Southern University, Briggs & Stratton Corp., East Georgia Regional Medical Center and Viracon Georgia, Inc. Statesboro is a regional retail hub for many small communities in southeast Georgia. This market has a population of approximately 68,000. Population growth has been steady, growing 21.8% from 2000 to 2010, and is expected to grow by 7.3% over the next four years. A major driver of growth for this area has been Georgia Southern University, which has approximately 18,000 full-time students.

Southeast Georgia Market – Savannah MSA. The Savannah MSA is a five-tiered economy consisting of manufacturing, the port and transportation, tourism, the military, and miscellaneous and other businesses such as health care. Median and household income levels are below the state and national averages. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 8.8%, compared with 8.9% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include Gulfstream Aerospace, International Paper, Georgia Pacific Savannah River Site, Memorial Health, and Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield. The transportation industry, centered on the Port of Savannah, is a vital element of the economy and is the fifth largest container port in the country, handling more than 2.1 million container units in 2010 and shipping to more than 150 countries around the world. This MSA has a population of approximately 347,000. Population growth has been steady, growing 18.3% from 2000 to 2010, and is expected to grow by 7.6% over the next four years.

Southwest Georgia Market – Adel/Cook County. The Adel/Cook County market is based primarily on agriculture and manufacturing. Median and household income levels are below the state and national averages. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 11.9%, compared with 13.1% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include BASF Sparks LLC, Jimmy Bullard and Sons, and J-M Manufacturing Co. The market has a population of approximately 17,000. Population growth has been relatively flat, with growth of 5.9% from 2000 to 2010. The population is expected to grow 1.4% over the next four years.

Southeast Georgia Market - Baxley/Appling County. The Baxley/Appling County market is a service- based economy, with strong roots in manufacturing and agriculture. Median and household income are below the state and national averages. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 10.5%, compared with 10.0% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Altamaha Homecare and Rayonier Wood Products. The market has a population of approximately 18,000. Population growth has been relatively flat, with a 3.5% growth rate from 2000 to 2010. The population is expected to grow 2.1% over the next four years.

Southeast Georgia Market – Hazlehurst/Jeff Davis County. The Hazlehurst/Jeff Davis County market is a service-based economy, with strong roots in manufacturing and agriculture. Median and household income levels are below that state and national averages. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 13.3%, compared with 14.2% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include Propex Inc., McPherson Manufacturing Corp. and Beasley Forest Products. The market has a population of approximately 13,000. Population growth has been relatively flat, with growth of 5.8% from 2000 to 2010. The population is expected to grow 3.2% over the next four years.

Southeast Georgia Market - Tattnall County. The Tattnall County market is largely based on agriculture. Median and household income are below the state and national averages. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 9.2%, compared with 10.1% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the market include Fries Farms and Tattnall State Prison. This market has a population of approximately 24,000. Population growth in this area has remained relatively flat, with a 5.4% growth from 2000 to 2010. Over the next four years, the population is expected to grow 2.3%.

North Central Florida Market - Ocala Metropolitan Statistic Area. The Ocala MSA is a service based economy. The area is known for its world-class equestrian training facilities and its booming retirement communities. Median household income and per capita income are below the state and national averages. However, due to the large retirement population, much more of the income is disposable in nature compared to other markets. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 11.6%, compared with 15.7% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include Monroe Regional Medical Centers, Wal-Mart Stores, AT&T, Publix Supermarkets, Emergency One, Lockheed Martin, ClosetMaid, and Central Florida Community College. This MSA has a population of approximately 344,000, and has experienced growth of 32.8% from 2000 to 2010. Over the next four years, the population is expected to grow 9.1%.

North Central Florida Market - Lake City Metropolitan Statistic Area. The Lake City MSA is service-based. Median household income and per capita income are below the state and national averages. As of December 2011, the market area reported an unemployment rate of 9.9%, compared with 13.7% for the same period in the prior year and 8.5% for the national average. Major employers in the area include the Veterans Administration Medical Center, TIMCO and Sitel. This MSA has a population of approximately 70,000, and has experienced growth of 24.5% from 2000 to 2010. Over the next four years, the population is expected to grow 8.0%.

Competition

We face strong competition in originating commercial, real estate and other loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating real estate loans comes primarily from other banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers. Other banks, credit unions and finance companies also provide vigorous competition in consumer and commercial lending.

We attract deposits through our branch office system. Competition for those deposits is principally from other banks and credit unions located in the same community, as well as mutual funds and other alternative investments. We compete for these deposits by offering superior service and a variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates.

Available Information

Heritage maintains a website at www.eheritagebank.com. The Company currently makes available on or through its website its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, amendments to these reports, and all other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings. These materials are also available free of charge on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

Lending Activities

The following table presents information concerning the composition of HeritageBank's loan portfolio in dollar amounts and in percentages (before deductions for allowances for losses) as of the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2011					2010					2009					2008					2007
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Real Estate
Non residential	$	138,970		24.79	%	$	110,079		26.27	%	$	71,158		21.30	%	$	52,477		17.35	%	$	41,630		13.66	%
Multifamily		15,797		2.82			13,598		3.25			12,135		3.63			10,719		3.54			12,297		4.04
Farmland		17,921		3.20			12,339		2.94			9,013		2.70			5,744		1.90			4,818		1.58
Total		172,688		30.80			136,016		32.46			92,306		27.63			68,940		22.79			58,745		19.28

Construction and land		26,804		4.78			24,522		5.85			28,385		8.49			43,297		14.31			51,308		16.84

Consumer Real Estate
Mortgage loans, 1-4 families		129,745		23.14			131,293		31.34			87,469		26.18			79,727		26.36			74,752		24.54
Home equity		26,154		4.67			26,091		6.23			18,778		5.62			18,344		6.06			17,257		5.66
Total		155,899		27.81			157,384		37.57			106,247		31.80			98,071		32.42			92,009		30.20

Commercial and industrial loans		55,179		9.84			52,589		12.55			45,837		13.72			42,838		14.17			44,922		14.74
Consumer and other loans		23,872		4.26			27,115		6.47			36,943		11.06			49,342		16.31			57,689		18.94

Loans acquired through
FDIC-assisted transactions
Non-Covered		18,721		3.34			21,371		5.10			24,420		7.30			-		-			-		-
Covered		107,457		19.17			-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-
Total		126,178		22.51			21,371		5.10			24,420		7.30			-		-			-		-

Total loans		560,620		100.00	%		418,997		100.00	%		334,138		100.00	%		302,488		100.00	%		304,673		100.00	%
Less allowance for loan losses		7,494					8,101					6,060					4,951					4,416
Total loans, net	$	553,126				$	410,896				$	328,078				$	297,537				$	300,257

The following table shows the composition of HeritageBank's loan portfolio by fixed- and adjustable-rates at the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2011					2010					2009					2008					2007
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-Rate Loans:
Real Estate
Consumer real estate	$	117,336		20.93	%	$	102,626		24.49	%	$	98,462		29.47	%	$	72,353		23.92	%	$	69,841		22.92	%
Multi-family		12,340		2.20			10,190		2.43			6,455		1.93			5,210		1.72			7,178		2.36
Nonresidential		113,761		20.29			77,033		18.39			58,419		17.48			42,084		13.91			32,634		10.71
Farmland		14,534		2.59			8,086		1.93			4,789		1.43			2,174		0.72			3,337		1.10
Construction and land		20,799		3.71			12,966		3.09			8,752		2.62			8,426		2.79			13,903		4.56
Total real estate loans		278,770		49.73			210,901		50.33			176,877		52.93			130,247		43.06			126,893		41.65
Consumer and other loans		19,953		3.56			20,021		4.78			21,992		6.58			45,168		14.93			53,618		17.60
Commercial and industrial loans		28,523		5.09			21,964		5.24			18,997		5.69			14,218		4.70			16,482		5.41
Total fixed-rate loans		327,246		58.37			252,886		60.35			217,866		65.20			189,633		62.69			196,993		64.66

Adjustable-Rate Loans:
Real Estate
Consumer real estate		38,563		6.88			8,335		1.99			7,785		2.33			7,374		2.44			4,911		1.61
Multifamily		3,457		0.62			580		0.14			5,680		1.70			5,509		1.82			5,119		1.68
Nonresidential		25,209		4.50			20,449		4.88			12,739		3.81			10,393		3.44			8,996		2.95
Farmland		3,387		0.60			3,689		0.88			4,224		1.27			3,569		1.18			1,481		0.49
Construction and land		6,005		1.07			9,460		2.26			19,633		5.88			34,871		11.53			37,405		12.28
Total real estate loans		76,621		13.67			45,513		10.15			50,061		14.99			61,716		20.41			57,912		19.01
Consumer and other loans		3,919		0.70			21,892		5.22			14,951		4.48			22,518		7.44			21,328		7.00
Commercial and industrial loans		26,656		4.75			28,231		6.74			26,840		8.03			28,621		9.46			28,440		9.33
Total adjustable-rate loans		107,196		19.12			92,636		22.11			91,852		27.50			112,855		37.31			107,680		35.34
		434,442		77.49			345,522		82.46			309,718		92.70			302,488		100.00			304,673		100.00

Loans acquired through
FDIC-assisted transactions
Non-Covered		18,721		3.34			21,371		5.10			24,420		7.30			-		-			-		-
Covered		107,457		19.17			-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-
Total		126,178		22.51			21,371		5.10			24,420		7.30			-		-			-		-
Total loans		560,620		100.00	%		418,997		100.00	%		334,138		100.00	%		302,488		100.00	%		304,673		100.00	%
Less allowance for loan losses		7,494					8,101					6,060					4,951					4,416
Total loans, net		553,126					410,896				$	328,078				$	297,537				$	300,257

The following schedule illustrates the contractual maturity of HeritageBank's loan portfolio at December 31, 2011, excluding purchased loans. Mortgages that have adjustable or renegotiable interest rates are shown as maturing in the period during which the contract is due. The schedule does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or enforcement of due-on-sale clauses.

	Consumer and Commercial Real Estate					Construction and land					Consumer and Other					Commercial and Industrial					Total
Due During Years Ending December 31, 2011	Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
2012(1)	$	59,667		5.93	%	$	18,756		5.45	%	$	7,018		7.88	%		28,909		5.04	%	$	114,350		5.67	%
2013		53,207		5.62			1,678		5.61			4,829		8.28			7,380		5.31			67,094		5.78
2014		39,097		5.66			1,716		6.33			4,688		7.37			3,270		5.86			48,771		5.87
2015 to 2016		51,297		5.70			2,531		5.76			4,370		6.01			8,092		5.28			66,290		5.67
2017 to 2021		61,707		5.24			341		6.53			2,799		7.04			7,528		4.56			72,375		5.25
2022 to 2026		24,488		4.89			1,363		4.83			56		7.15			-		-			25,907		4.89
2027 and following		39,124		5.11			419		5.40			112		8.64			-		-			39,655		5.13
Total	$	328,587		5.51		$	26,804		5.52			23,872		7.34			55,179		5.09			434,442		5.54

(1)	Includes demand loans, loans having no stated maturity and overdraft loans.

Lending authority. The Board of Directors has established lending authorities for its officers. Based on individual experience, Market Presidents and Commercial Lenders have established lending authorities up to $500,000, Consumer and Mortgage Lenders have lending authorities up to $100,000. Regional Managers and Regional Presidents may make and approve secured loans up to $1.0 million. Regional Credit Officers may approve secured loans up to $1.5 million. The Chief Banking Officer’s lending authority covers loans and relationships up to $2.0 million. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Credit Officer may approve loans and relationships up to $5.0 million. These higher lending authorities are granted in conjunction with the written recommendations and analysis of the commercial managers, regional presidents and regional credit officers. Relationships and exposures that exceed $5.0 million must be approved by the Board of Directors.

We are subject to lending limits established under Georgia law for loans to one borrower and the borrower's related entities. See “How We Are Regulated - HeritageBank - Georgia Regulation.” Based on our capital level at December 31, 2011, the maximum amount under Georgia law that we could loan to any one borrower and the borrower's related entities was $20.6 million for fully secured loans (including loans secured by real estate for which we have an independent appraisal) and $12.4 million for all other loans. Internally, we have set a limit of $5.0 million for all loans to any one borrower and the borrower’s related entities. This internal limit may be exceeded with the approval of the Board of Directors.

Major loan customers. Our ten largest lending relationships, excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions, are with commercial borrowers and total $53.3 million in the aggregate, or 9.0% of our $560.6 million loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. These relationships consist of $6.8 million to a specialty chemical business and their related interests in southwest Georgia; $6.2 million to a nursing home secured by real estate located in southwest Georgia; $6.2 million for a finance company secured by accounts receivable and real estate in southwest Georgia; $5.5 million for the permanent financing of a hotel in north central Florida; $5.0 million secured by real estate in north central Florida; $5.0 million to a retail pharmacy business secured by inventory and real estate located primarily in southwest Georgia; $4.9 million secured primarily by multifamily and residential rental real estate in southwest Georgia; $4.6 million to a franchise restaurant chain in north central Florida; $4.6 million to a restaurant in southwest Georgia; and $4.5 million secured primarily by multifamily and residential rental real estate in southwest Georgia. As of the date of this filing, these major customer relationships were performing and rated as pass credits.

For further information on credit quality, see the discussion under the headings Item 1 - Asset Quality -- Delinquent Loans and -- Classified Assets and see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Consumer Real Estate Lending. We originate loans secured by first mortgages on one- to four-family residences, including home equity lines of credit, in our lending area, and on occasion, outside our lending area for customers whose primary residences are within our lending area. The majority of these loans are originated by us and sold to other lenders. At December 31, 2011, we had $155.9 million, or 27.81% of gross loans, in consumer residential loans, of which $117.3 million were fixed-rate loans and $38.6 million were adjustable rate loans.

Our home equity lines of credit totaled $26.2 million and accounted for 4.7% of gross loans at December 31, 2011. These loans may be originated in amounts, together with the amount of the existing first mortgage, of up to 100% of the value of the property securing the loan. Home equity lines of credit generally have a 15-year draw period and require the payment of 1.5% of the outstanding loan balance per month during the draw period, which may be reborrowed at any time during the draw period. We also offer a 15-year home equity line of credit that requires interest-only payments for the first five years, then fully amortizing payments over the remaining 10 years of the loan. At December 31, 2011, unfunded commitments on home equity lines of credit totaled $15.7 million. Other consumer loan terms vary according to the type of collateral, length of contract and creditworthiness of the borrower.

We generally underwrite our one- to four-family owner-occupied loans based on the applicant's employment and credit history and the appraised value of the subject property. Presently, we lend up to 90% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price for one- to four-family residential loans. Properties securing our one- to four-family loans are appraised by independent fee appraisers approved by the Board of Directors. We require our borrowers to obtain title insurance, hazard insurance and, if necessary, flood insurance. We currently originate one- to four-family mortgage loans on either a fixed- or adjustable-rate basis, as consumer demand dictates. Our pricing strategy for mortgage loans includes setting interest rates that are competitive with other local financial institutions and consistent with our internal needs. Fixed-rate loans generally have a 15- to 30-year term.

Adjustable-rate mortgage, or ARM, loans are generally offered with annual repricing with a maximum annual rate change of 1% and maximum overall rate change of 4%. We use a variety of indices to reprice our ARM loans. Our ARM loans generally provide for specified minimum and maximum interest rates, with a lifetime cap and floor, and a periodic adjustment of the interest rate over the rate in effect on the date of origination. As a consequence of using caps, the interest rates on these loans may not be as rate sensitive as is our cost of funds. Our ARM loans are written using generally accepted underwriting guidelines. ARM loans generally pose different credit risks than fixed-rate loans, primarily because as interest rates rise, the borrower's payment rise, increasing the potential for default. We do not offer initial discounted rates or “teaser” rates on adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Our real estate loans contain a “due on sale” clause allowing us to declare the unpaid principal balance due and payable upon the sale of the collateral.

We generally underwrite our non-owner-occupied, one- to four-family loans primarily based on a 1.25 times debt service coverage, though we also consider the applicant's creditworthiness and the appraised value of the property. Presently, we lend up to 85% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price for the residence. These loans are offered with a fixed rate or an adjustable rate using The Wall Street Journal prime rate as the index. These loans have terms of up to 15 years and are not assumable. We generally obtain title opinions from our counsel regarding these properties.

Commercial Real Estate Lending. We offer a variety of multifamily, nonresidential, and farmland real estate loans. These loans are secured primarily by multifamily dwellings, retail establishments, hotels, motels, warehouses, small office buildings, farmland, and other properties located in our market areas. At December 31, 2011, commercial real estate totaled $172.7 million, or 30.8% of gross loans. Nonresidential real estate totaled $139.0 million, or 24.8% of gross loans, and multifamily real estate totaled $15.8 million, or 2.82% of gross loans as December 31, 2011.

Nonresidential and multifamily loans are originated with either a fixed or adjustable interest rate over various terms and structures. The interest rate on adjustable-rate loans is based on a variety of indices, generally determined through negotiation with the borrower. Loan-to-value ratios on our nonresidential and multifamily real estate loans typically do not exceed 80% of the appraised value of the property securing the loan. Loans secured by nonresidential and multifamily real estate are underwritten based on the income producing potential of the property and the financial strength of the borrower. The net operating income, which is the income derived from the operation of the property less all operating expenses, must be sufficient to cover the payments related to the outstanding debt. We generally require personal guarantees of the borrowers and an assignment of rents or leases in order to be assured that the cash flow from the project will be used to repay the debt. Appraisals on properties securing nonresidential and multifamily real estate loans are performed by independent state certified or licensed fee appraisers approved by the board of directors, with a second independent appraisal review performed if the loan exceeds $500,000.

We generally do not maintain a tax or insurance escrow account for loans secured by nonresidential and multifamily real estate. In order to monitor the adequacy of cash flows on income-producing properties, the borrower is generally required to provide periodic financial information.

Loans secured by nonresidential and multifamily real estate properties generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than single family residential mortgage loans. These loans typically involve large balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Because payments on loans secured by nonresidential and multifamily real estate properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of these loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, or if leases are not obtained or renewed, the borrower's ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

Our loans secured by farmland totaled $17.9 million, or 3.2% of gross loans, and are originated with either a fixed or adjustable interest rate over a three-or five-year term with a balloon payment generally based on a 15-year amortization. The interest rate on adjustable-rate loans is based on a variety of indices, generally determined through negotiation with the borrower. Loan-to-value ratios on our farmland loans typically do not exceed 80% of the appraised value of the property securing the loan. Farmland loans are underwritten based on the income-producing potential of the property and the financial strength of the borrower. In order to monitor the adequacy of cash flows from farm operations, the borrower is required to provide periodic financial information.

Loans secured by farmland generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family residential loans. These loans typically involve large balances, and repayments are often dependent on the successful operation of the farm, making them subject to adverse weather and economic conditions. If the cash flow from the farm operations declines, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan is impaired.

Construction and Land Lending. Our construction loan portfolio consists of loans for the construction of one- to four-family residences, multifamily residences and commercial properties. Construction lending generally affords us an opportunity to receive interest at rates higher than those obtainable from residential lending and to receive higher origination and other loan fees. In addition, construction loans are generally made with adjustable rates of interest for six- to nine-month terms, with interest-only payments due during the construction period. At December 31, 2011, we had $26.8 million in construction loans outstanding, representing 4.8% of gross loans.

Construction loans also involve additional risks because funds are advanced upon the security of the project under construction, which is of uncertain value prior to the completion of construction. Moreover, because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, delays arising from labor problems, material shortages, and other unpredictable contingencies, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project, and the related loan-to-value ratios. We fund our construction loans based on percentage of completion as determined by physical property inspections. Acquisition and development loans are required to be paid down as lots are sold, though on an accelerated basis so that we are repaid before all the lots are sold. See also the discussion under the headings “Classified Assets” and “Loan Delinquencies and Defaults.”

Commercial and Industrial Lending. At December 31, 2011, commercial business loans totaled $55.2 million or 9.8% of gross loans. Our commercial business lending activities encompass loans with a variety of purposes and security, including loans to finance accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Our commercial business lending policy includes credit file documentation and analysis of the borrower's background, capacity to repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower's capital and collateral as well as an evaluation of other conditions affecting the borrower. Analysis of the borrower's past, present and future cash flows is also an important aspect of our credit analysis.

Commercial business loans are generally secured by business assets, such as accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. This collateral may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself (which, in turn, is often dependent in part upon general economic conditions). We generally obtain personal guarantees on our commercial business loans. Nonetheless, these loans are believed to carry higher credit risk than traditional single family loans.

Consumer and Other Lending. We offer a variety of secured consumer loans, new and used auto loans, boat and recreational vehicle loans, and loans secured by deposit accounts. We also offer a limited amount of low dollar, unsecured loans. We originate our consumer and other loans primarily in our market areas. At December 31, 2011, our consumer and other loan portfolio totaled $23.9 million, or 4.3% of gross loans.

We originate auto loans on a direct basis and, in very limited circumstances, on an indirect basis. Auto loans may be written for up to six years and usually have fixed rates of interest. Loan-to-value ratios are up to 100% of the sales price for new autos and 100% of retail value on used autos, based on valuation from official used car guides. Consumer loans generally have shorter terms to maturity, which reduces our exposure to changes in interest rates, and carry higher rates of interest than do one- to four-family residential mortgage loans.

Management believes that offering consumer loan products helps to expand and create stronger ties to our existing customer base by increasing the number of customer relationships and providing cross-market selling opportunities. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do single family residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles and recreational vehicles. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. As a result, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability and, thus, are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy.

Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Repayments and Servicing

We originate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans primarily through referrals from real estate agents, builders and from existing customers. Loan origination fees earned totaled $814,000, $824,000 and $557,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

While we originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans, our ability to originate loans is dependent upon customer demand for loans in our market areas. Demand is affected by competition and the interest rate environment. Loans and participations purchased must conform to our underwriting guidelines. Furthermore, during the past few years, we, like many other financial institutions, experienced significant prepayments on loans due to customer preferences to deleverage since the 2008 economic recession. In periods of economic uncertainty, the ability of financial institutions, including ours, to originate or purchase large dollar volumes of real estate loans may be substantially reduced or restricted, which in turn lowers our interest income.

In addition to the categories of loans originated by us and described above, as of December 31, 2011, $126.2 million, or 22.5% of gross loans, consisted of loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, with $107.5 million covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC. Due diligence performed on these loans was limited due to the quick timing required for these transactions; however, the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC provides coverage for 80% of the covered loan balance, which significantly mitigates the credit risk exposure for these loans. See Item 8 - Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about these loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions.

We have agreements with mortgage lenders, pursuant to which we originate and fund residential mortgage loans for these lenders in accordance with their policies, terms, and conditions. We charge the borrower an origination fee for processing the application in accordance with the lender's specifications. We also may earn a premium on these loans based on the difference between the rate on the loan and the lock-in rate accepted by the lender. During 2011, we originated $94.0 million of mortgage loans for these lenders, generating approximately $2.3 million in mortgage banking income on these loans. During 2010, we originated $30.0 million of mortgage loans for these lenders, generating approximately $607,000 in mortgage banking income on those loans.

In addition to interest earned on loans and loan origination fees, we receive fees for loan commitments, late payments and other miscellaneous services. The fees vary from time to time, generally depending on the supply of funds and other competitive conditions in the market. Fees for late payments totaled $246,000, $267,000 and $283,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Asset Quality

When a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan, we attempt to cure the delinquency by contacting the borrower. Delinquent consumer loan customers are contacted by the lender and a centralized collections department. Delinquent commercial loan customers are contacted by the lender and are turned over to our special assets division if collection efforts by the lender are not successful. If the borrower does not cure the delinquency then we undertake an analysis of the best means to maximize our collection efforts, which may include litigation, taking a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, and/or initiating foreclosure proceedings. In the event we take title to underlying collateral, we generally seek to sell the asset as soon as practicable.

Delinquent Loans. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of delinquent loans that were still accruing interest at December 31, 2011, excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, that were 30 to 89 days past due in the amount of their contractual principal balances totaling approximately $371,000:

	Thirty to fifty-nine days			Sixty to eighty-nine days			Total thirty to eighty-nine days
	(Dollars in thousands)

Delinquent Loans:
Consumer real estate	$	147		$	24		$	171
Multifamily		-			-			-
Non Residential		111			-			111
Farmland		-			-			-
Construction and land		-			-			-
Consumer and other		29			-			29
Commercial and industrial		60			-			60
Total	$	347		$	24		$	371
Total as a percentage of total loans		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.1	%

Nonperforming Assets. The following table sets forth the amounts and categories of nonperforming assets in our loan portfolio. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when the collection of principal and/or interest becomes doubtful. Our loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions are excluded from the nonperforming loan table below because they are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30. See Item 8 - Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. At all dates presented, we had no accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent.

At December 31, 2011, we had troubled debt restructurings totaling $10.4 million, which involve forgiving a portion of interest or principal on any loans or making loans at a rate materially less than that of market rates. Included in nonaccruing loans at December 31, 2011, are troubled debt restructurings of $4.2 million. In addition, at that date we had troubled debt restructurings totaling $6.2 million that were performing in accordance with their modified terms and are not included in nonaccruing loans. Foreclosed assets owned include assets acquired in settlement of loans.

	December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccruing Loans:
Consumer real estate	$	4,772		$	4,873		$	1,505		$	689		$	373
Multifamily		2			1,770			122			-			-
Nonresidential		361			1,586			236			988			35
Farmland		111			-			-			-			-
Construction and development		442			1,423			2,863			4,882			2,357
Commercial and industrial		1,179			88			3,248			147			-
Consumer and other		176			165			489			575			447
Total nonaccruing loans		7,043			9,905			8,463			7,281			3,212

Foreclosed Assets:
Consumer real estate		498			468			583			115			-
Multifamily		-			-			-			-			-
Nonresidential		45			1,095			362			284			287
Construction and development		2,806			2,126			794			1,666			-
Commercial and industrial		-			-			-			-			-
Consumer and other		7			-			56			55			78
Total foreclosed assets		3,356			3,689			1,795			2,120			365
Total nonperforming assets	$	10,399		$	13,594		$	10,258		$	9,401		$	3,577
Total as a percentage of total assets		0.95	%		1.80	%		1.79	%		1.87	%		0.76	%

For the year ended December 31, 2011, there was approximately $267,000 of gross interest income that would have been recorded had the non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms. No significant amount was included in interest income on these loans for this period.

See Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 --- Delinquencies and Non-performing Assets for more information on our non-performing assets.

Other Loans of Concern. In addition to the nonperforming assets set forth in the table above, as of December 31, 2011, there was also an aggregate of $22.8 million of loans with respect to which known information about the possible credit problems of the borrowers have caused management to have doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply fully with present loan repayment terms and that may result in the future inclusion of those loans in the non-performing asset categories. These loans include all criticized and classified loans and certain other past due loans that are not in a non-performing loan category. These loans have been considered in management's determination of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses.

At December 31, 2011, we had five other loans of concern of over $1.0 million totaling approximately $10.5 million. The largest was a $3.5 million loan secured by 219.8 acres of land in Ocala, Florida. The remaining loans of concern over $1.0 million at December 31, 2011 consisted of a $2.7 million loan secured by various residential properties in southwest Georgia, a $1.6 million loan secured by various residential properties in southwest Georgia, $1.5 million secured by non residential properties in southwest Georgia, and $1.1 million in various residential properties in southeast Georgia.

Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide for the classification of loans and other assets, such as debt and equity securities considered to be of lesser quality, as "substandard," "doubtful" or "loss." An asset is considered "substandard" if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. "Substandard" assets include those characterized by the "distinct possibility" that the insured institution will sustain "some loss" if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as "doubtful" have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified "substandard," with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make "collection or liquidation in full," on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, "highly questionable and improbable." Assets classified as "loss" are those considered "uncollectible" and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted.

When HeritageBank classifies problem assets as either substandard, doubtful, or loss, the loans are charged down to appraised value less selling costs while specific allowances are used for loans that do not qualify for a charge-off but the loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we establish general allowances based on historical loss history and migration analysis. General allowances represent loss allowances that have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets. Our determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (“GDBF”), which may order the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.

We regularly review the problem assets in our portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations. On the basis of management's review of our assets, at December 31, 2011, we had $23.9 million of our assets internally classified, of which $20.5 million consisted of loans and $3.4 million was other real estate and repossessions. All of these assets were classified as substandard. We had no assets classified as doubtful or loss at December 31, 2011. The total amount classified represented 19.2% of our equity capital and 2.2% of our assets at December 31, 2011. All of our $10.4 million in nonperforming assets at December 31, 2011, were included in our classified assets at that date, and the allowance for loan losses related to those nonperforming assets at that date was $1.9 million.

Allowance for Loan Losses. We maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, management considers the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, migration analysis, probability of default, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate, small commercial real estate, home equity and consumer loans, are evaluated in the aggregate using historical loss factors. More complex loans, such as multifamily, commercial real estate loans, and commercial and industrial loans, are evaluated individually for impairment, primarily through the evaluation of collateral values.

At December 31, 2011, our allowance for loan losses was $7.5 million or 1.3% of the total loan portfolio compared with a balance of $8.1 million, or 1.9% of total loans at December 31, 2010. Total criticized and classified loans decreased by $4.6 million during the period to $33.2 million at December 31, 2011 from $37.8 million at December 31, 2010. Nonaccrual loans decreased $2.9 million during the period to $7.0 million at December 31, 2011 compared with $9.9 million at December 31, 2010. Loans past due thirty days and still accruing, excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, decreased by $1.5 million to $371,000 at December 31, 2011 compared with $1.9 million at December 31, 2010.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which management believes is adequate to absorb all probable losses on loans then present in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is affected by: (1) loan charge-offs, which decrease the allowance; (2) recoveries on loans previously charged-off, which increase the allowance; (3) the provision for possible loan losses charged against income, which increases the allowance; and (4) credit mark transfers as a result of acquired loan pools experiencing credit losses in excess of the fair value discounts established, which increases the allowance. The allowance is discussed further in Item 8 - Notes 1 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation Critical Accounting Policies -Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth an analysis of our allowance for loan losses.

	December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	8,101		$	6,060		$	4,951		$	4,416		$	4,076

Charge-offs:
Consumer real estate		(3,177	)		(1,278	)		(494	)		(81	)		(55	)
Commercial real estate		(573	)		(412	)		(25	)		(773	)		(29	)
Construction and land		(18	)		(704	)		(3,100	)		(1,414	)		(435	)
Commercial and industrial		(330	)		(804	)		(2,338	)		(47	)		(116	)
Consumer and other		(264	)		(488	)		(664	)		(687	)		(398	)
		(4,362	)		(3,686	)		(6,621	)		(3,002	)		(1,033	)

Recoveries:
Consumer real estate		18			10			-			-			-
Commercial real estate		495			-			-			4			-
Construction and land		2			-			-			2			-
Commercial and industrial		-			-			50			20			-
Consumer and other		148			217			180			161			195
		663			227			230			187			195

Net charge-offs		(3,699	)		(3,459	)		(6,391	)		(2,815	)		(838	)

Credit mark transfer in		197			-			-			-			-

Provision charged to operations		2,895			5,500			7,500			3,350			1,178

Balance at end of period	$	7,494		$	8,101		$	6,060		$	4,951		$	4,416

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loansoutstanding during period		0.91	%		0.87	%		2.13	%		1.58	%		0.29	%

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average nonperforming assets		31.90	%		36.23	%		65.54	%		58.51	%		36.12	%

Allowance as a percentage of nonperforming loans		106.40	%		81.79	%		71.61	%		67.99	%		137.49	%

Allowance as a percentage of total loans (end of period)		1.72	%		2.04	%		1.81	%		1.64	%		1.45	%

____________

(1)	Ratios are on an annualized basis and exclude loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions.

The distribution of our allowance for losses on loans at the dates indicated is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2011					2010					2009					2008					2007
	Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)

Consumer real estate	$	2,440		27.81	%	$	2,197		37.57	%	$	1,422		31.80	%	$	637		32.42	%	$	553		30.20	%
Commercial real estate		1,878		30.80			1,721		32.46			1,176		27.63			1,015		22.79			1,012		19.28
Construction and land		1,270		4.78			1,977		5.85			1,419		8.49			1,275		14.31			1,616		16.84
Consumer and other		355		4.26			605		6.47			850		11.06			890		16.31			740		18.94
Commercial and Industrial		1,551		9.84			1,601		12.55			1,193		13.72			1,134		14.17			495		14.74
Loans acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions		-		22.51			-		5.10			-		7.30			-		-			-		-
Unallocated		-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-
Total	$	7,494		100.00	%	$	8,101		100.00	%	$	6,060		100.00	%	$	4,951		100.00	%	$	4,416		100.00	%

Investment Activities

Georgia savings banks have the authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including United States Treasury obligations, securities of various federal, state and local agencies and jurisdictions, including callable agency securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, certain bankers' acceptances, repurchase agreements, federal funds, and other investments. Subject to various restrictions, Georgia savings banks also may invest their assets in investment grade commercial paper and corporate debt securities and mutual funds whose assets conform to the investments that a Georgia savings bank is otherwise authorized to make directly. See "How We Are Regulated - HeritageBank of the South - Georgia Regulation" for a discussion of additional restrictions on our investment activities.

The Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have the basic responsibility for the management of our investment portfolio. They consider various factors when making decisions, including the marketability, maturity, and tax consequences of the proposed investment. The maturity structure of investments will be affected by various market conditions, including the current and anticipated slope of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, the trend of new deposit inflows, and the anticipated demand for funds via deposit withdrawals and loan originations and purchases. The general objectives of our investment portfolio are to provide liquidity when loan demand is high, to assist in maintaining earnings when loan demand is low and to maximize earnings while satisfactorily managing risk, including credit risk, reinvestment risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk. See Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk.

Our investment securities currently consist of mortgage-backed securities, federal agency securities, preferred stocks, state and local government securities, and corporate debt securities. See Item 8 - Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, we had $4.1 million in stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta valued at cost at December 31, 2011. We maintain the minimum amount of stock the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta allows based on our level of borrowings. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we received $37,000 in dividends from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.

The following table sets forth the composition of our securities portfolio and other investments at the dates indicated. Our securities portfolio at December 31, 2011, did not contain securities of any single issuer with an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity capital, excluding those issued by the United States Government or its sponsored entities.

	December 31,
	2011					2010					2009
	Carrying Value		% of Total			Carrying Value		% of Total			Carrying Value		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities available for sale:
U. S. Government sponsored agencies (GSE) securities and U.S. Treasury Securities	$	45,737		17.65	%	$	89,032		37.35	%	$	30,462		25.27	%
Corporate debt securities		1,956		0.76			1,700		0.71			1,910		1.58
GSE residential mortgage- backed securities		162,963		62.92			125,336		52.58			54,537		45.26
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		-		0.00			2,807		1.18			3,874		3.21
State and municipal securities		48,204		18.61			19,160		8.04			29,123		24.16
Equity and other		157		0.06			342		0.14			621		0.52
		259,017		100.00	%		238,377		100.00	%	$	120,527		100.00	%
Other earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	$	43,101		62.54	%	$	10,911		63.02	%	$	43,236		74.76	%
Federal funds sold		21,753		31.56			2,700		15.59			11,340		19.61
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,067		5.90			3,703		21.39			3,253		5.63
	$	68,921		100.00	%	$	17,314		100.00	%	$	57,829		100.00	%

The composition and maturities of the securities portfolio, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank stock, as of December 31, 2011 are indicated in the following table. Yields on tax exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis. For further information on the ratings of these securities, see Item 8 - Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation - Critical Accounting Policies -- Estimates of Fair Value and - Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

	Less than One Year					One to Five Years					Over Five to Ten Years					Over Ten Years					Total Securities
	Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Fair Value
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Securities Available for Sale:
U. S. Government sponsored agencies (GSE) securities		-		-	%	$	3,028		1.47	%	$	4,456		2.03	%	$	37,657		2.26	%	$	45,141		2.19	%	$	45,737
State and municipal		-		-			1,180		4.13			7,045		3.30			38,942		3.61			47,167		3.58			48,204
Corporate debt securities		1,007		6.01			1,153		7.19			-		-			-		-			2,160		6.64			1,956
GSE mortgage-backed securities		-		-			256		1.76			23,172		2.39			138,526		1.75			161,954		1.85			162,963
Equity and other		-		-			-		-			-		-			207		5.90			207		5.90			157
Total investment securities	$	1,007		6.01	%	$	5,617		3.22	%	$	34,673		2.53	%	$	215,332		2.18	%	$	256,629		2.27	%	$	259,017

Sources of Funds

General. Our sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, payment of principal and interest on loans, interest earned on or maturation of other investment securities and funds provided from operations.

Deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts to both consumers and businesses having a wide range of interest rates and terms. Our deposits consist of savings and checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, NOW, demand accounts, and certificates of deposit. We solicit deposits primarily in our market areas and rely on competitive pricing policies, marketing and customer service to attract and retain these deposits. In addition, we solicit brokered deposits when terms and rates are more favorable than those in the markets we serve. At December 31, 2011, we had $45.2 million in brokered deposits, of which $34.8 million were money market deposits from a broker/dealer, and $10.4 million were in certificates of deposit in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service® or CDARS®.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in prevailing interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts we offer has allowed us to be competitive in obtaining funds and to respond with flexibility to changes in consumer demand. We have become more susceptible to short-term fluctuations in deposit flows, as customers have become more interest rate conscious. We try to manage the pricing of our deposits in keeping with our asset and liability management, liquidity and profitability objectives, subject to competitive factors. Based on our experience, we believe that our deposits are relatively stable sources of funds. Despite this stability, our ability to attract and maintain these deposits and the rates paid on them has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.

Under regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”), we are required to maintain noninterest-bearing reserves at specified levels against our transaction accounts, primarily checking and NOW accounts. At December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with these federal requirements and, as a result, would have been deemed to be in compliance with a similar reserve requirement under Georgia law.

The following table sets forth our deposit flows during the periods indicated.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)

Opening balance	$	534,243		$	426,607		$	338,546
Net deposits and withdrawals		341,588			103,031			81,589
Interest credited		8,356			4,605			6,472

Ending balance	$	884,187		$	534,243		$	426,607

Net increase	$	349,944		$	107,636		$	88,061

Percent increase		65.5	%		25.23	%		26.01	%

The following table indicates the amount of our certificates of deposit and other deposits by time remaining until maturity as of December 31, 2011.

	Maturity as of December 31, 2011
	Three Months or Less		Over Three to Six Months		Over Six to Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Time deposits of less than $100,000	$	34,604	$	32,684	$	37,642	$	49,176	$	154,106
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		40,111		28,221		43,161		43,180		154,673
Total time deposits	$	74,715	$	60,905	$	80,803	$	92,356	$	308,779

The following tables set forth the average dollar amount of deposits in the various types of non-interest bearing and interest-bearing deposit programs we offered during the periods indicated and the average rate paid on the interest-bearing accounts.

	For the twelve months ended December 31,
	2011					2010					2009
	Average Balance		Average Rate			Average Balance		Average Rate			Average Balance		Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)

Non-interest bearing deposits	$	70,120		N/A		$	41,446		N/A		$	20,875		N/A

Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-bearing demand	$	135,608		0.60	%	$	92,147		1.00	%	$	50,679		1.05	%
Savings and money market accounts		288,378		0.82			186,870		1.09			122,453		1.27
Retail time deposits		271,634		1.54			159,366		1.60			122,332		3.10
Wholesale time deposits		11,666		1.60			11,293		2.29			17,981		3.32
Total interest-bearing deposits	$	707,286		1.07	%	$	449,676		1.28	%	$	303,445		2.09	%

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of deposits in the various types of deposit programs offered at the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2011					2010					2009
	Amount		Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Transaction and Savings Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	$	78,823		8.91	%	$	44,769		8.38	%	$	28,882		6.77	%
Interest bearing demand		151,765		17.16			109,329		20.46			67,321		15.78
Savings and money market		344,820		39.01			211,105		39.52			154,740		36.27
Total transaction and savings		575,408		65.08			365,203		68.36			250,943		58.82
Certificates:
0.00-1.99%		221,786		25.08			85,326		15.97			77,824		18.27
2.00-3.99%		73,587		8.32			70,743		13.24			82,109		19.28
4.00-5.99%		13,406		1.52			12,586		2.36			14,636		3.43
6.00% and over		-		-			385		0.07			382		0.09
Total certificates		308,779		34.92			169,040		31.64			174,951		41.08

Total deposits	$	884,187		100.00	%	$	534,243		100.00	%	$	425,894		100.00	%

The following table shows rate and maturity information for our certificates of deposit at December 31, 2011.

	0.00- 1.99%			2.00-3.99%			4.00- 5.99%			6.00% and over			Total			Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Certificates maturing in quarter ending:
March 31, 2012	$	66,095		$	7,555		$	1,065		$	-		$	74,715			24.20	%
June 30, 2012		53,552			5,476			1,878			-			60,906			19.72
September 30, 2012		36,617			6,202			2,379			-			45,198			14.64
December 31, 2012		31,772			3,029			803			-			35,604			11.53
March 31, 2013		8,232			3,212			536			-			11,980			3.88
June 30, 2013		7,281			3,290			980			-			11,551			3.74
September 30, 2013		4,791			5,904			3,574			-			14,269			4.62
December 31, 2014		6,658			4,684			909			-			12,251			3.97
March 31, 2014		589			4,593			158			-			5,340			1.73
June 30, 2014		1,609			1,834			375			-			3,818			1.24
September 30, 2014		1,111			1,951			-			-			3,062			0.99
December 31, 2014		481			2,759			-			-			3,240			1.05
Thereafter		2,998			23,098			749			-			26,845			8.69
Total	$	221,786		$	73,587		$	13,406		$	-		$	308,779			100.00	%

Percent of Total		71.83	%		23.83	%		4.34	%		0.00	%		100.00	%

Borrowings. Although deposits are our primary source of funds, we may utilize borrowings when they are a less costly source of funds, when we desire additional capacity to fund loan demand, or when they meet our asset/liability management goals. Our borrowings consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”), federal funds purchased, and securities sold under repurchase agreements. See Item 8 - Notes 13 and Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Advances from the FHLB require borrowing capacity supported by the pledging of certain loans or securities. These advances may be made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate, range of maturities, and call features. At December 31, 2011, we had $35.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances outstanding and the ability to borrow an additional $72.8 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.

We have the ability to borrow from securities broker-dealers and customers by pledging investments. These arrangements are known as securities sold under repurchase agreements. These borrowings can be done on an overnight, short-term or long-term basis. As of December 31, 2011, we had $30.1 million borrowed under long-term agreements with broker-dealers and $3.4 million borrowed under overnight agreements with customers.

We also have the ability to borrow up to $42.0 million from correspondent banks, pursuant to renewable lines of credit. In addition, we also borrow from Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia on an overnight basis, depending on their liquidity needs. At December 31, 2011, we had approximately $1.6 million in federal funds purchased from that bank compared with $13,000 at December 31, 2010.

We are authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's “discount window" after it has exhausted other reasonable alternative sources of funds, including FHLB advances.

The following table sets forth the average and weighted average rate paid, period-end balance, maximum month-end balance and average balance of FHLB advances for the periods indicated.

	At or For the Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
Maximum Balance:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	62,500		$	62,500		$	52,500

Average Balance:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	46,473		$	42,983		$	47,268

Average interest rate paid during the period		3.19	%		3.70	%		3.87	%

End of Period Balance:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	35,000		$	62,500		$	42,500

Weighted average interest rate of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		3.68	%		2.65	%		3.68	%

The following table sets forth the maximum month-end balance and average balance of federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements for the periods indicated.

	At or For the Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
Maximum Balance:
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	36,750		$	35,446			$	53,279

Average Balance:
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	33,383		$	34,097			$	40,112

Average interest rate paid during the period		3.94	%		2.71	%			1.23	%

End of Period Balance:
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	35,049		$	32,421			$	32,843

Weighted average interest rate of Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		3.77	%		2.98	%			1.08	%

Subsidiary and Other Activities

We are engaged in the sale of securities and insurance products to customers through an agreement with a third-party broker-dealer. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we earned $1.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in gross fees and commissions from this activity. This activity is conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of federal and state insurance and securities laws.

In 2008, we acquired 4.9% of the outstanding shares of Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia, a de novo bank in Gainesville, Georgia, for approximately $1.0 million. This investment provides us with the opportunity to further expand outside of southwest Georgia. We also participate in loans generated by Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia that exceed its legal lending limits, allowing us to generate loan volume and exposure to the northeast Georgia market without incurring building and personnel costs. O. Leonard Dorminey, our President and Chief Executive Officer, serves on the board of directors, executive committee and loan committee of Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia. As of December 31, 2011, we had $3.0 million in loan participations with and $1.6 million in federal funds purchased from Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia.

We currently do not have any active subsidiaries.

Employees

At December 31, 2011, we had a total of 327 full-time equivalent employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations to be good.

How We Are Regulated

As a result of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), effective July 20, 2011, Heritage’s regulation and supervision as a savings and loan holding company was transferred from the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) to the FRB. This oversight by the FRB is currently substantially similar to that conducted by the OTS, except for a FRB regulation requiring that Heritage serve as a source of financial and managerial strength for HeritageBank, particularly when HeritageBank is in financial distress. HeritageBank is a Georgia savings bank subject to regulation and supervision by the GDFB and the FDIC, which also insures our deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) that has authority to promulgate regulations intended to protect consumers with respect to financial products and services, including those provided by HeritageBank, and to restrict unfair, deceptive or abusive conduct by providers of consumer financial products and services. These regulations had previously been enacted by HeritageBank’s primary federal regulator. As a public company, Heritage is subject to the regulation and reporting requirements of the SEC.

Set forth below is a brief description of material information regarding certain laws and regulations that are and will be applicable to Heritage and HeritageBank.

Legislation is introduced from time to time in the United States Congress and Georgia General Assembly that may affect our operations. In addition, the regulations governing Heritage and HeritageBank may be amended from time to time by the GDBF, the FDIC, the FRB, the CFPB or the SEC, as appropriate. Any legislative or regulatory changes, including those resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act, in the future could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. This includes the authority from the Dodd-Frank Act effective July 21, 2011, for financial institutions to pay interest on demand deposits, which could increase our interest expense. See “- The Dodd-Frank Act” below for additional information on its provisions.

The GDBF, the FDIC and the FRB, as appropriate, have extensive enforcement authority over Heritage and HeritageBank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with the FDIC. Except under certain circumstances, public disclosure of formal enforcement actions by the FDIC and FRB is required by law.

HeritageBank of the South

HeritageBank, as a Georgia savings bank, is subject to regulation and periodic examination by the GDBF and the FDIC. This regulation extends to all aspects of its operations. HeritageBank is required to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital and is subject to some limitations on the payment of dividends to Heritage. See “Regulatory Capital Requirements” and “Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions.” State and federal laws and regulations prescribe the investment and lending authority and activities of Georgia savings banks. The FDIC also insures the deposits of HeritageBank to the maximum extent permitted by law. This regulation of HeritageBank is generally intended for the protection of depositors and the insurance of accounts fund and not for the purpose of protecting stockholders.

Georgia Regulation. HeritageBank is subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the GDBF. The GDBF regularly examines HeritageBank, often jointly with the FDIC. As a Georgia savings bank, HeritageBank is required to have no more than 50% of its assets in commercial real estate and business loans. HeritageBank is in compliance with this requirement. Our lending and investment authority and other activities are governed by Georgia law and regulations and policies of the GDBF. We are subject to a statutory lending limit for aggregate loans to one person or a group of persons combined because of certain common interests. That limit is 15% of our statutory capital base, except for loans fully secured by good collateral or ample security, which includes real estate with an independent appraisal, in which case that limit is increased to 25%. Our statutory capital base consists of our stock, paid-in-capital and surplus, capital debt and appropriated retained earnings, which is that portion of our retained earnings designated by the board of directors as not available for dividends, reduced by intangible assets. We have not appropriated any retained earnings. Georgia law limits our ability to invest in real estate, including a limit on fixed assets of 60% of our statutory capital base, except for temporary grants of authority to exceed that limit granted by the GDBF. We are in compliance with limitations on our fixed assets as of December 31, 2011.

Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC. The FDIC regularly examines HeritageBank and prepares reports for the consideration of its board of directors on any deficiencies that it may find in operations. HeritageBank generally must notify or obtain the approval of the FDIC if it or any of its subsidiaries intend to engage in activities not authorized for national banks. During examinations, the FDIC may require the Bank to establish additional reserves for loan losses, which decreases the Company’s net income. The FDIC has adopted guidelines establishing safety and soundness standards on such matters as loan underwriting and documentation, asset quality, earnings standards, internal controls and audit systems, interest rate risk exposure, and compensation and other employee benefits. Any institution that fails to comply with these standards must submit a compliance plan.

HeritageBank’s deposits are insured up to the applicable limits by the FDIC, and such insurance is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. The basic deposit insurance is $250,000 per each separately insured depositor, as defined in FDIC regulations. As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require reporting by insured institutions. Our deposit insurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 2011 were approximately $887,000. Those premiums have increased in recent years and may continue to increase in the future. Also, if the Bank experiences financial distress or operates in an unsafe or unsound manner, these deposit premiums will increase based on the formula established by the FDIC.

As a result of a decline in the reserve ratio (the ratio of the net worth of the deposit insurance fund to estimated insured deposits) and concerns about expected failure costs and available liquid assets in the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC required each insured institution to prepay on December 30, 2009, the estimated amount of its quarterly assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all quarters through the end of 2012 (in addition to the regular quarterly assessment for the third quarter which was due on December 30, 2009). The prepaid amount is recorded as an asset with a zero risk weight and the institution will continue to record quarterly expenses for deposit insurance. For purposes of calculating the prepaid amount, assessments were measured at the institution’s assessment rate as of September 30, 2009, with a uniform increase of 3 basis points effective January 1, 2011, and were based on the institution’s assessment base for the third quarter of 2009, with growth assumed quarterly at an annual rate of 5%. If events cause actual assessments during the prepayment period to vary from the prepaid amount, institutions will pay excess assessments in cash, or receive a rebate of prepaid amounts not exhausted after collection of assessments due on June 30, 2013, as applicable. Collection of the prepayment does not preclude the FDIC from changing assessment rates or revising the risk-based assessment system in the future. The rule included a process for exemption from the prepayment for institutions whose safety and soundness would be affected adversely.

On February 7, 2011, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC adopted new regulations, which became effective April 1, 2011, that redefined the “assessment base” used for calculating deposit insurance assessments. Rather than the previous system, whereby the assessment base is calculated by using an insured depository institution’s domestic deposits less a few allowable exclusions, the new assessment base is calculated using the average consolidated total assets of an insured depository institution less the average tangible equity (Tier 1 capital) of such institution. The FDIC continues to utilize a risk-based assessment system in which institutions will be subject to assessment rates ranging from 2.5 to 45 basis points, subject to adjustments for unsecured debt and, in certain cases, brokered deposits. The new rules eliminated adjustments for secured liabilities.

The new rules retain the FDIC’s flexibility to, without further notice-and-comment rulemaking, adopt rates that are higher or lower than the stated base assessment rates, provided that the FDIC cannot (i) increase or decrease the total rates from one quarter to the next by more than two basis points, or (ii) deviate by more than two basis points from the stated base assessment rates. Although the Dodd-Frank Act makes the FDIC’s payment of a dividend to depository institutions discretionary, as opposed to mandatory, when the reserve ratio exceeds a certain threshold, the FDIC’s new rule establishes a decreasing schedule of assessment rates that would take effect when the DIF reserve ratio first meets or exceeds 1.15%. If the DIF reserve ratio meets or exceeds 1.15%, base assessment rates would range from 1.5 to 40 basis points; if the DIF reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2%, base assessment rates would range from 1 to 38 basis points; and if the DIF reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2.5%, base assessment rates would range from 0.5 to 35 basis points. All base assessment rates would continue to be subject to adjustments for unsecured debt and brokered deposits. ally expected to have a positive effect on small institutions (those with less than $10 billion in assets), such as HeritageBank, because the large bulk of such institutions are expected to see a decrease in assessments, the impact of the new rule and/or additional FDIC special assessments or other regulatory changes affecting the financial services industry could negatively affect our liquidity and results of operations in future periods.

The FDIC also collects a deposit-based assessment from insured financial institutions on behalf of The Financing Corporation (“FICO”). The funds from these assessments are used to service debt issued by FICO in its capacity as a financial vehicle for the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation. The FICO assessment rate is set quarterly and in 2011 ranged from 0.68 cents to 1.02 cents per $100 of assessable deposits. These assessments will continue until the debt matures between 2017 and 2019.

The FDIC also may prohibit any insured institution from engaging in any activity that it determines by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to the deposit insurance fund and may terminate our deposit insurance if it determines we have engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or are in an unsafe or unsound condition.

Heritage

As the holding company of a Georgia savings bank, Heritage is subject to regulation and examination by the GDBF and the FRB. This regulation extends to all aspects of its operations. Our federal and state regulators impose minimum capital requirements on us and the other holding companies and financial institutions they regulate. They also may impose higher capital requirements on an individualized basis if they believe the financial institution or holding company is subject to excessive risk. See “Regulatory Capital Requirements” and “Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions.”

Regulation by the FRB. Heritage is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FRB. Applicable federal law and regulations limit the activities of Heritage and require the approval of the FRB for any acquisition or divestiture of a subsidiary, including another financial institution or holding company thereof. The Bank is required to file reports with the FRB, beginning for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, and is subject to regulation and examination by the FRB, including regulations requiring that the Company serve as a source of financial and managerial strength for the Bank, particularly when the Bank is in financial distress.

Generally, transactions between HeritageBank and its affiliates are required to be on terms as favorable to the institution as transactions with non-affiliates, and certain of these transactions, such as loans to an affiliate, are restricted to a percentage of HeritageBank's capital. In addition, HeritageBank may not lend to any affiliate engaged in activities not permissible for a bank holding company or acquire the securities of most affiliates. Heritage is an affiliate of HeritageBank.

Under federal law, if HeritageBank fails the qualified thrift lender test, Heritage must obtain the approval of the FRB prior to continuing, directly or through other subsidiaries, any business activity other than those approved for multiple savings association holding companies or their subsidiaries. In addition, within one year of such failure, Heritage must register as, and will become subject to, the restrictions applicable to bank holding companies. The qualified thrift lender test requires a savings institution to have at least 65% of its portfolio assets, as defined by regulation, in qualified thrift investments on a monthly average for nine out of every 12 months on a rolling basis. As an alternative, the savings institution may maintain 60% of its assets in those assets specified in Section 7701(a)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under either test, such assets primarily consist of residential housing related loans and investments. At December 31, 2011, HeritageBank met the test.

Georgia Regulation. The GDBF has supervisory and examination authority over HeritageBank. Under this authority, there are limits on the amount of debt that can be incurred by the holding companies, and they must file periodic reports and annual registration forms.

Regulatory Capital Requirements for HeritageBank. HeritageBank is required to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital under regulations of the FDIC and polices of the GDBF. These regulations established two capital standards, a leverage capital requirement and a risk-based capital requirement. The FDIC also may impose capital requirements in excess of these standards on individual institutions on a case-by-case basis based on the particular circumstances or risk profile of the institution. See Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Capital Resources” for information on the Bank’s compliance with these capital requirements.

The capital standards generally require Tier 1 capital equal to at least 4.0% of adjusted total assets, deducting most intangibles. The FDIC also requires HeritageBank to have Tier 1 capital of at least 4.0% of risk weighted-assets and total capital of at least 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet items, will be multiplied by a risk weight, ranging from 0% to 100%, based on the risk inherent in the type of asset. Total capital consists of Tier 1 capital, as defined above, and Tier 2 capital, which consists of certain permanent and maturing capital instruments that do not qualify as Tier 1 capital and of the allowance for possible loan and lease losses up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Tier 2 capital may be used to satisfy these risk-based requirements only to the extent of Tier 1 capital. The FDIC is authorized to require HeritageBank to maintain an additional amount of total capital to account for concentration of credit risk, level of interest rate risk, equity investments in non-financial companies and the risk of non-traditional activities.

The FDIC is authorized and, under certain circumstances, required to take certain actions against banks that fail to meet their capital requirements. The FDIC is generally required to take action to restrict the activities of an “undercapitalized institution," which is an institution with less than either a 4% leverage capital ratio, a 4% Tier 1 risked-based capital ratio or an 8% total risk-based capital ratio. Any such institution must submit a capital restoration plan and until such plan is approved by the FDIC may not increase its assets, acquire another institution, establish a branch or engage in any new activities, and generally may not make capital distributions. The FDIC is authorized to impose the additional restrictions.

Any institution that fails to comply with its capital plan or has Tier 1 risk-based or leverage capital ratios of less than 3% or a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0% is considered "significantly undercapitalized" and must be made subject to one or more additional specified actions and operating restrictions that may cover all aspects of its operations and may include a forced merger or acquisition of the institution. An institution with tangible equity to total assets of less than 2% is "critically undercapitalized" and becomes subject to further mandatory restrictions on it. The FDIC generally is authorized to reclassify an institution into a lower capital category and impose the restrictions applicable to such category if the institution is engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or is in an unsafe or unsound condition. The imposition by the FDIC of any of these measures on HeritageBank may have a substantial adverse effect on its operations and profitability.

The imposition by the FDIC of any of these measures on HeritageBank may have a substantial adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

Georgia imposes a capital requirement based on the leverage capital requirement of the FDIC. A Georgia savings bank must have at least a 4.5% leverage capital ratio, though the GDBF can impose a higher requirement for the specific circumstances and risks of the institution. Many banks are required to have a 5.5% ratio to address these specific circumstances and risks, and any bank with a less than 5.5% leverage capital ratio must submit a two-year capital plan with the GDBF.

Regulatory Capital Requirements for Heritage. Heritage is required to maintain a certain level of capital under a policy of the GDBF that imposes a Tier 1 capital to total assets capital ratio of 4%, or higher for holding companies engaged in more risky, non-financial businesses. This level is based on the capital requirement imposed on bank holding companies by the FRB and is similar to the Tier 1 leverage ratio imposed on HeritageBank. If Heritage fails to meet this requirement, it must file a capital plan and focus on reducing its more risky operations, and it may be subject to an enforcement action, including a capital directive.

Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions

The ability of the Bank to pay dividends depends on its earnings and capital levels and may be limited by FDIC or GDBF directives or orders. Unless it meets certain financial criteria, HeritageBank must obtain the prior written approval of the GDBF before paying any dividend to Heritage. Those financial criteria are having: (1) classified assets of no more than 80% of Tier 1 capital plus an allowance for loan losses at the time of its last examination; (2) paid no more than 50% of last calendar year's net income in dividends in the current calendar year, and (3) a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 6%. Georgia law prohibits HeritageBank from paying a dividend if its debt to equity ratio is 30% or more or if it is not meeting its capital requirement. No dividends were paid by HeritageBank in 2011 or 2010.

As a subsidiary financial institution of a savings association holding company, any distributions of capital by Heritage, including dividends and stock redemptions or repurchases, are subject to regulation by the FRB. Heritage must file a notice with the FRB before declaring any dividend. The FRB will consult the FDIC about the appropriateness of the proposed dividend, and the FRB may object to any proposed dividend.

Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates

Heritage and HeritageBank are subject to the provisions of Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. Section 23A places limits on the amount of:

·	a bank’s loans or extensions of credit to affiliates;

·	a bank’s investment in affiliates;

·	assets a bank may purchase from affiliates, except for real and personal property exempted by the FRB;

·	loans or extensions of credit made by a bank to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of affiliates; and

·	a bank’s guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit issued on behalf of an affiliate.

The total amount of the above transactions is limited in amount, as to any one affiliate, to 10% of a bank’s capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates combined, to 20% of a bank’s capital and surplus. In addition to the limitation on the amount of these transactions, each of the above transactions must also meet specified collateral requirements. HeritageBank must also comply with other provisions designed to avoid taking low-quality assets.

Heritage and HeritageBank are also subject to the provisions of Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, which, among other things, prohibit an institution from engaging in the above transactions with affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the institution or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies.

The Dodd-Frank Act enhances the requirements for certain transactions with affiliates under Section 23A and 23B, including an expansion of the definition of “covered transactions” and increasing the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered transactions must be maintained.

HeritageBank is also subject to restrictions on extensions of credit to its executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their related interests. These extensions of credit (1) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties, and (2) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Effective July 21, 2011, an insured depository institution is prohibited from engaging in asset purchases or sales transactions with its officers, directors or principal shareholders unless on market terms and, if the transaction represents greater than 10% of the capital and surplus of the bank, it has been approved by a majority of the disinterested directors.

The Dodd-Frank Act

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was enacted in July 2010, have had a broad impact on the financial services industry. Its provisions include significant regulatory and compliance changes that are designed to improve the supervision, oversight, safety and soundness of the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act establishes a new framework for systemic risk oversight within the financial system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies, including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the FRB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC.

Some of the Dodd-Frank Act’s most far-reaching provisions, such as those regulating derivatives and proprietary trading activity and hedge funds, providing for enhanced supervision of “systemically significant” institutions, and phasing out Tier 1 capital treatment for trust preferred securities, apply only to institutions with over $10 billion in assets or to business lines in which we do not engage. Certain provisions do, however, apply to or affect us, including provisions that:

·	Change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from a deposit-based to an asset-based calculation as described in “—Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC” above;

·	Make permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until December 31, 2012 for non-interest-bearing demand transaction accounts;

·	Repeal the federal prohibition on payment of interest on demand deposits;

·	Impose new mortgage lending requirements, including minimum underwriting standards, originator compensation restrictions, consumer protections for certain types of loans, and disclosure to borrowers;

·	Apply to bank holding companies the same leverage and risk-based capital requirements that apply to insured depository institutions;

·	Permit de novo and interstate branching; and

·	Impose new limits on affiliate transactions as described in “—Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates” above.

Federal Taxation

Heritage and HeritageBank are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Heritage or HeritageBank.

Heritage will file a consolidated federal income tax return with HeritageBank. Accordingly, it is anticipated that any cash distributions made by Heritage to its stockholders would be considered to be taxable dividends and not as a nontaxable return of capital to stockholders for federal and state tax purposes.

Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, HeritageBank currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a fiscal year ending on December 31 for filing its federal income tax return.

Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code imposes an alternative minimum tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences, called alternative minimum taxable income. The alternative minimum tax is payable to the extent such alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of an exemption amount. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. Certain payments of alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years.

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards. A financial institution may carryback net operating losses to the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years. This provision applies to losses incurred in taxable years beginning after August 6, 1997. At December 31, 2011, Heritage had no net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes.

Corporate Dividends-Received Deduction. Because it files a consolidated return with its wholly owned subsidiary, HeritageBank, dividends from HeritageBank are not included as income to Heritage. The corporate dividends-received deduction is 100%, or 80% in the case of dividends received from corporations with which a corporate recipient does not file a consolidated tax return, depending on the level of stock ownership of the payor of the dividend. Corporations that own less than 20% of the stock of a corporation distributing a dividend may deduct 70% of dividends received or accrued on their behalf.

State Taxation

Heritage and HeritageBank are subject to Georgia and Florida corporate income tax, which is assessed at the rate of 6%. For this purpose, taxable income generally means federal taxable income subject to certain modifications provided for in Georgia and Florida law. Heritage and HeritageBank also are subject to Georgia business occupation taxes computed on gross receipts after deducting exempt income and interest paid on deposits and other liabilities. The tax rates assessed vary from one municipality to another. The total occupation taxes expensed in 2011 was $297,000.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following are certain risk factors that could impact our business, financial results, and results of operations. Investing in our common stock involves risks, including those described below. These risk factors should be considered by prospective and current investors in our common stock when evaluating the disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (particularly the forward-looking statements). These risk factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. If any of the events in the following risks actually occur, or if additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we believe are immaterial do materialize, then our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely impacted. In addition, the trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of the events described in these risks.

The United States economy has been gradually improving but unemployment is still elevated, and another economic downturn impacting our geographic market areas would adversely affect our business and financial results.

The United States experienced a severe economic recession beginning in 2008 and many of the effects of that recession are expected to continue in 2012. While economic growth has resumed recently, the rate of growth has been slow and unemployment remains at very high levels and is not expected to improve greatly in the near future. Furthermore, our primary market areas in southern Georgia and northern and central Florida have experienced unemployment rates higher than the national average. Loan portfolio quality has deteriorated at many financial institutions reflecting, in part, the weak U.S. economy and high unemployment. In addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages have declined and may continue to decline. The continuing real estate downturn also has resulted in reduced demand for the construction of new housing and increased delinquencies in construction, residential and commercial mortgage loans for many lenders. Stock prices for financial institutions and their holding companies have declined substantially, and it is significantly more difficult for those entities to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets.

Continued negative developments in the financial services industry and the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the market for and value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Moreover, continued declines in the stock market in general, or in stock values of financial institutions and their holding companies specifically, could adversely affect our stock performance.

Our expansion efforts, particularly through new and acquired branches, may not be successful if we fail to manage our growth effectively.

A key component of our strategy to grow and improve profitability is to expand our branch network into communities within or adjacent to Georgia and Florida markets in which we currently conduct business. In February 2011, we acquired four branches west of Savannah, Georgia in an FDIC-assisted transaction subject to a loss-sharing agreement. In August 2011, we acquired one branch in Statesboro, Georgia in an FDIC-assisted transaction subject to a loss-sharing agreement. We intend to continue to pursue a growth strategy for our business. Operating branches outside of our original southwest Georgia market and beyond our current market areas may subject us to additional risk, including the local risks related to the new market areas, management of employees from a distance, additional credit risks, logistical operational issues and management time constraints.

We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions and expansion opportunities, and, if appropriate opportunities present themselves, we expect to engage in selected acquisitions of financial institutions in the future, including FDIC-assisted transactions, branch acquisitions, or other business growth initiatives or undertakings. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify appropriate opportunities, that we will be able to negotiate or finance such activities or that such activities, if undertaken, will be successful. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to manage the costs and implementation risks associated with this strategy so that expansion of our branch network will be profitable. In addition, if we were to conclude that the value of an acquired business had decreased and that the related goodwill had been impaired, that conclusion would result in an impairment of goodwill charge to us, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

We have engaged in three FDIC-assisted transactions with two subject to loss-sharing agreements and may engage in more such transactions in the future, which could present additional risks to our financial condition and earnings.

We have engaged in three FDIC-assisted acquisitions with two subject to loss-sharing agreements. These acquisitions involve risks similar to acquiring existing banks, even though the FDIC might provide assistance to mitigate certain risks, such as sharing in exposure to loan losses and providing indemnification against certain liabilities of the failed institution. As is typical in the acquisition of a failed financial institution, many of the loans acquired in these acquisitions were non-performing and had poor documentation, including a lack of current financial information on borrowers and of current evidence of collateral value.

In December 2009, we acquired a failed bank in southeast Georgia in an FDIC-assisted transaction, including $37.5 million in loans. This FDIC-assisted transaction did not involve a loss-share agreement pursuant to which the FDIC covers portions of the losses incurred or the assets acquired. We did, however, receive a $15.0 million purchase discount paid by the FDIC. These loans are carried on our books at fair value, based on an estimate of future cash flows, which we review and evaluate quarterly and, under GAAP. Because of the condition and terms of these loans, the actual amount recognized by us on these assets could differ materially from this fair value, and we also anticipate incurring foreclosure and collection expenses on certain of these loans over the next five years, which will increase our non-interest expense. Therefore, we may incur losses on this acquired loan portfolio.

In February 2011, we acquired a failed bank in east Georgia with $145 million in loans, and in August 2011, we acquired a failed bank in southeast Georgia with $99 million in loans. In each of these transactions, we entered into a loss-share agreement under which the FDIC will reimburse us for 80% of the losses on covered loans and other real estate owned. These loss-share agreements require us to follow specific servicing and reporting procedures. Failure to properly follow these procedures or other breach of the loss-share agreements by us could result in the loss of the FDIC reimbursement of losses on covered loans and other real estate owned, which could have a material negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

At December 31, 2011, we had an FDIC loss-share receivable of $83.9 million associated with our loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC. This receivable always reflects the present value of our expected losses related to FDIC-assisted acquisitions plus reimbursable expenses less recoveries. The receivable is adjusted for improvements in cash flow by reducing the receivable through negative accretion. Conversely, if losses are greater than anticipated, the receivable would be increased.

In the current economic environment, we expect to be presented with more opportunities to acquire the assets and liabilities of failed banks through FDIC-assisted transactions. However, these acquisitions are structured in a manner that does not allow us the time normally associated with preparing for and evaluating an acquisition, including preparing for integration of an acquired institution. Therefore, we may face additional risks, including the loss of customers, strain on management resources related to collection and management of problem loans and problems related to integration of personnel and operating systems. We cannot assure that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with FDIC-assisted transactions. Our inability to overcome these risks could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our business strategy and maintain our market value and profitability. Moreover, even though we are inclined to participate in an FDIC-assisted transaction, we can offer no assurances that we would be successful in acquiring the financial institution or assets that we are seeking.

Changes in national and local economic conditions could lead to higher than anticipated loan charge-offs on assets acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions.

The fluctuations in national, regional and local economic conditions, including those related to local residential, commercial real estate and construction markets, may increase the level of charge-offs that we make to our loan portfolio, and, consequently, reduce our net income, and may also increase the level of charge-offs on the loan portfolios that we have acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions and correspondingly reduce our net income. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled and may have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition even if other favorable events occur.

Although we have entered into two loss-share agreements with the FDIC providing a significant portion of losses related to specified loan portfolios that we acquired in connection with our two 2011 FDIC-assisted transactions will be borne by the FDIC, we are not protected for all losses resulting from charge-offs with respect to those specified loan portfolios. Additionally, the loss-share agreements have limited terms; therefore, any charge-off of related losses that we experience after the term of the loss-sharing agreements will not be reimbursable by the FDIC and will negatively impact our net income.

Our business may be affected adversely by credit risk associated with residential property.

As of December 31, 2011, residential mortgage loans, including home equity loans and lines of credit, totaled $155.9 million, or 27.81%, of total loans. This type of lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that may significantly affect the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. The decline in residential real estate values resulting from the downturn in local housing markets has reduced the value of the real estate collateral securing the majority of our loans and has increased the risk that we would incur losses if borrowers default on their loans. In addition, borrowers seeking to sell their homes may find that they cannot sell their properties for an amount equal to or greater than the unpaid principal balance of their loans. Continued declines in both the volume of real estate sales and sales prices, coupled with high levels of unemployment, may result in higher loan delinquencies or problem assets, a decline in demand for our products and services or a decrease in our deposits. These potential negative events may cause us to incur losses, which would adversely affect our capital and liquidity and could damage our financial condition and business operations. These declines may have a greater impact on our earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of financial institutions that have more diversified loan portfolios.

We are subject to credit risks in connection with the concentration of adjustable rate loans in our portfolio.

Adjustable rate loans totaled $107.2 million, or 19.12%, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. Borrowers with adjustable rate loans are exposed to increased monthly payments when the related interest rate adjusts upward under the terms of the loan to the rate computed in accordance with the applicable index and margin. Any rise in prevailing market interest rates may result in increased payments for borrowers who have adjustable-rate loans, increasing the possibility of default. Borrowers seeking to avoid these increased monthly payments by refinancing their loans may no longer be able to find available replacement loans at comparably lower interest rates. In addition, declining housing prices may prevent refinancing or a sale of the home because borrowers may then have insufficient equity in their homes. These events, alone or in combination, may contribute to higher delinquency rates and negatively impact our earnings.

If our nonperforming assets increase, our earnings will be negatively impacted.

At December 31, 2011, our nonperforming assets (which consist of non-accrual loans, loans 90 days or more delinquent, nonperforming troubled debt restructurings and foreclosed real estate assets) totaled $10.4 million, which was a decrease of $3.2 million or 23.0% over non-performing assets at December 31, 2010. Our non-performing assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or real estate owned. We must reserve for estimated credit losses, which are established through a current period charge to the provision for loan losses, and from time to time, if appropriate, we must write down the value of properties in our other real estate owned portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs including taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our other real estate owned. Further, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires the active involvement of management, potentially distracting them from the overall supervision of our operations and other income-producing activities.

If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.

We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and delinquency experience, and we evaluate economic conditions. Management recognizes that significant new growth in loan portfolios, new loan products, and the refinancing of existing loans can result in portfolios comprised of unseasoned loans that may not perform in a historical or projected manner. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual losses, resulting in additions to our allowance. Additions to our allowance decrease our net income. Our allowance for loan losses, excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, was 1.72% of gross loans, excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, and 106.40% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2011, compared to 2.04% of gross loans, excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, and 81.79% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2010.

Our emphasis on originating commercial and consumer real estate and commercial and industrial loans is one of the more significant factors in evaluating the allowance for loan losses. As we continue to increase our originations of these loans, increased provisions for loan losses may be necessary, resulting in decreased earnings.

Our regulators and external auditor periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their review. These increases in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If our investments in real estate are not properly valued or sufficiently reserved to cover actual losses, or if we are required to increase our valuation reserves, our earnings could be reduced.

We obtain updated valuations in the form of appraisals and broker price opinions when a loan has been foreclosed and the property taken in as other real estate owned (“OREO”), and at certain other times during the asset’s holding period. Our net book value (“NBV”) in the loan at the time of foreclosure and thereafter is compared to the updated market value of the foreclosed property less estimated selling costs (fair value). A charge-off is recorded for any excess in the asset’s NBV over its fair value. If our valuation process is incorrect, the fair value of our investments in real estate may not be sufficient to recover our NBV in such assets, resulting in the need for additional charge-offs. Additional material charge-offs to our investments in real estate could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our bank regulator periodically reviews our REO and may require us to recognize further charge-offs. Any increase in our charge-offs, as required by our regulator, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our securities portfolio may be negatively impacted by fluctuations in market value and interest rates, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our securities portfolio may be impacted by fluctuations in market value, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings. Fluctuations in market value may be caused by decreases in interest rates, lower market prices for securities and limited investor demand. Our securities portfolio is evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis. If this evaluation shows impairment to the actual or projected cash flows associated with one or more securities, a potential loss to earnings may occur. Changes in interest rates can have an adverse effect on our financial condition, as our available-for-sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value, and therefore are impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. We increase or decrease our stockholders’ equity by the amount of change in the estimated fair value of the available-for-sale securities, net of taxes. At December 31, 2011, the change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale from the level at December 31, 2010 was an increase of $5.5 million.

Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our results of operations and financial condition are affected significantly by changes in interest rates. Our results of operations depend substantially on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Because interest-bearing liabilities generally reprice or mature more quickly than interest-earning assets, an increase in interest rates generally would tend to result in a decrease in net interest income.

Changes in interest rates may affect the average life of loans and mortgage-related securities. Decreases in interest rates can result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance to reduce their borrowing costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent that we are unable to reinvest the cash received from such prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates on existing loans and securities. Additionally, increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable-rate loans. Also, increases in interest rates may extend the life of fixed-rate assets, which would limit the funds we have available to reinvest in higher-yielding alternatives, and may result in customers withdrawing certificates of deposit early so long as the early withdrawal penalty is less than the interest they could receive as a result of the higher interest rates.

Changes in interest rates also affect the current fair value of our interest-earning securities portfolio. Generally, the value of securities moves inversely with changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2011, the fair value of our portfolio of available-for-sale securities totaled $259.0 million. Gross unrealized gains on these securities totaled $3.6 million, while gross unrealized losses on these securities totaled $1.2 million, resulting in a net unrealized gain of $2.4 million at December 31, 2011.

At December 31, 2011, the Company’s internal simulation model indicated that our net portfolio value would decrease by 0.3% if there was an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in market interest rates. See the Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk.

Our strategies to modify our interest rate risk profile may be difficult to implement.

Our asset/liability management strategies are designed to decrease our interest rate risk sensitivity. One such strategy is increasing the amount of adjustable rate and/or short-term assets. We offer adjustable rate loan products as a means to achieve this strategy. The availability of lower rates on fixed-rate loans would generally create a decrease in borrower demand for adjustable rate assets. Additionally, these adjustable-rate assets may prepay. At December 31, 2011, 19.12% of our loan portfolio consisted of adjustable-rate loans, compared to 22.11% at December 31, 2010.

We also are managing our liabilities to moderate our interest rate risk sensitivity. Customer demand is primarily for short-term certificates of deposit. Using short-term liabilities to fund long-term, fixed-rate assets will increase the interest rate sensitivity of any financial institution. We are utilizing FHLB advances and repurchase agreements to mitigate the impact of customer demand by lengthening the maturities of these advances or entering into longer term repurchase agreements, depending on liquidity or investment opportunities.

FHLB advances and repurchase agreements are entered into as liquidity is needed or to fund assets that provide for a spread considered sufficient by management. If we are unable to originate adjustable rate assets at favorable rates or fund loan originations or securities purchases with long-term advances or structured borrowings, we may have difficulty executing this asset/liability management strategy and/or it may result in a reduction in profitability.

We face risks related to covenants in our loan sales to investors and secondary mortgage market conditions.

Our agreements with investors to sell our loans generally contain covenants that require us to repurchase loans under certain circumstances, including some delinquencies, or to return premiums paid by those investors if the loans are paid off early. If we are required to repurchase sold loans under these covenants, they may be deemed troubled loans, with the potential for charge-offs and/or loss provision changes, which could impact our earnings and asset quality ratios adversely. We did not incur any losses in conjunction with these agreements in 2011.

Our ability to sell loans on the secondary mortgage market is impacted by interest rate changes and investor demand or expected return. If this market becomes less liquid, we may not be able to rely as much on loan sales to reduce our interest rate and credit risk.

We face significant operational risks.

We operate in many different financial service businesses and rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process a significant number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss from operations, including fraud by employees or outside persons, employees’ execution of incorrect or unauthorized transactions, data processing and technology errors or hacking and breaches of internal control systems.

A tightening of credit markets and liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition.

Liquidity is essential to our business. A tightening of the credit markets and the inability to obtain adequate funding to replace deposits and fund continued loan growth may affect asset growth, our earnings capability, and capital levels negatively. We rely on a number of different sources in order to meet our potential liquidity demands. Our primary sources of liquidity are increases in deposit accounts, including brokered deposits, as well as cash flows from loan payments and our securities portfolio. Borrowings, especially from the FHLB and repurchase agreements, also provide us with a source of funds to meet liquidity demands. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans, and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity.

Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities or on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically, or the financial services industry or economy in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include adverse regulatory action against us or a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated. Our ability to borrow also could be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financial markets, negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry in light of the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations, or continued deterioration in credit markets.

We may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. In that regard, a number of financial institutions have recently raised considerable amounts of capital in response to the deterioration in their results of operations and financial condition arising from the turmoil in the mortgage loan market, deteriorating economic conditions, declines in real estate values, and other factors. Should we be required by regulatory authorities to raise additional capital, we may seek to do so through the issuance of, among other things, our common stock or preferred stock. The issuance of additional shares of common stock or convertible securities to new stockholders would be dilutive to our current stockholders.

Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions, and a number of other factors, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure our ability to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

There may be future sales of additional common stock or preferred stock or other dilution of our equity, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We are not restricted from issuing additional common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or preferred stock or any substantially similar securities. The market value of our common stock could decline as a result of sales by us of a large number of shares of common stock or preferred stock or similar securities in the market or the perception that such sales could occur.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue additional common stock, as well as classes or series of preferred stock, generally without any action on the part of the stockholders. In addition, the board has the power, generally without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, and preferences over the common stock with respect to dividends or upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of our business and other terms. If we issue preferred stock in the future that has a preference over the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of holders of the common stock or the market value of the common stock could be adversely affected.

Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our stockholders.

Provisions in our charter and bylaws, the corporate law of the State of Maryland and federal regulations could delay, defer or prevent a third party from acquiring us, despite the possible benefit to our stockholders, or otherwise adversely affect the market price of any class of our equity securities, including our common stock. These provisions include: a prohibition on voting shares of common stock beneficially owned in excess of 10% of total shares outstanding, supermajority voting requirements for certain business combinations with any person who beneficially owns more than 10% of our outstanding common stock; the election of directors to staggered terms of three years; advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors; and for proposing matters that stockholders may act on at stockholder meetings, a requirement that only directors may fill a vacancy in our Board of Directors, supermajority voting requirements to remove any of our directors and the other provisions of our charter. Our charter also authorizes our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock, and preferred stock could be issued as a defensive measure in response to a takeover proposal. In addition, pursuant to federal and state laws and regulations, as a general matter, no person or company, acting individually or in concert with others, may acquire more than 10% of our common stock without prior approval from our regulators.

These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts, discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of, our common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for holders of our common stock to elect directors other than the candidates nominated by our Board of Directors.

The voting limitation provision in our charter could limit your voting rights as a holder of our common stock.

Our charter provides that any person or group who acquires beneficial ownership of our common stock in excess of 10% of the outstanding shares may not vote the excess shares. Accordingly, if you acquire beneficial ownership of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, your voting rights with respect to the common stock will not be commensurate with your economic interest in our company.

We currently hold a significant amount of bank-owned life insurance.

At December 31, 2011, we held $39.7 million of bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) on key employees and executives, with a cash surrender value of $15.6 million and plan to add another $7 million in 2012. The policies are maintained to fund amounts owed under executive supplemental retirement plans. The eventual repayment of the cash surrender value is subject to the ability of the various insurance companies to pay death benefits or to return the cash surrender value to us if needed for liquidity purposes. We continually monitor the financial strength of the various companies with whom we carry these policies. However, any one of these companies could experience a decline in financial strength, which could impair its ability to pay benefits or return our cash surrender value. If we need to liquidate these policies for liquidity purposes, we would be subject to taxation on the increase in cash surrender value and penalties for early termination, both of which would adversely impact earnings.

If our investment in the FHLB of Atlanta becomes impaired, our earnings and stockholders’ equity could decrease.

At December 31, 2011, we owned $4.1 million in FHLB of Atlanta stock. We are required to own this stock to be a member of and to obtain advances from our FHLB. This stock is not marketable and can only be redeemed by our FHLB. Our FHLB’s financial condition is linked, in part, to the eleven other members of the FHLB System and to accounting rules and asset quality risks that could materially lower their capital, which would cause our FHLB stock to be deemed impaired, resulting in a decrease in our earnings and assets.

Changes in laws and regulations and the cost of regulatory compliance with new laws and regulations may adversely affect our operations and our income.

The Bank and the Company are subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and examination by federal and state regulators, which have extensive discretion in connection with its supervisory and enforcement activities, including the ability to impose restrictions on a bank’s operations, reclassify assets, determine the adequacy of a bank’s allowance for loan losses and determine the level of deposit insurance premiums assessed. Because our business is highly regulated, the laws and applicable regulations are subject to frequent change. Any change in these regulations and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, new regulations, or legislation or additional deposit insurance premiums could have a material impact on our operations.

In response to the recent financial crisis, Congress took actions that are intended to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in financial institutions, and the FDIC has taken actions to increase insurance coverage on deposit accounts. The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act provides for the creation of the CFPB, which has broad authority to issue regulations governing the services and products we provide consumers. This additional regulation could increase our compliance costs and otherwise adversely impact our operations. That legislation also contains provisions that, over time, could result in higher regulatory capital requirements and loan loss provisions for the Company and the Bank and may increase interest expense due to the ability to pay interest on all demand deposits. The potential exists for additional federal or state laws and regulations, or changes in policy, affecting lending and funding practices and liquidity standards. See “How We Are Regulated.”

In this recent economic downturn, federal and state banking regulators have been active in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations and have issued many formal enforcement orders requiring capital ratios in excess of regulatory requirements. The FDIC and GDBF govern the activities in which the Bank may engage, primarily for the protection of depositors and not for the protection or benefit of stockholders. In addition, new laws and regulations may increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and otherwise affect our operations. New laws and regulations may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our loans and investments, the fees we can charge and our ongoing operations, costs, and profitability. For example, recent legislative proposals require changes to our overdraft protection programs that decrease the amount of fees we receive for these services. During 2011, overdraft protection and nonsufficient fund fees totaled $4.1 million. Further, legislative proposals limiting our rights as a creditor could result in credit losses or increased expense in pursuing our remedies as a creditor.

Increases in deposit insurance premiums and special FDIC assessments will negatively impact our earnings.

The Dodd-Frank Act established 1.35% of total insured deposits as the minimum reserve ratio. The FDIC has adopted a plan under which it will meet this ratio by the statutory deadline of September 30, 2020. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the FDIC to offset the effect on institutions with assets less than $10 billion of the increase in the minimum reserve ratio to 1.35% from the former minimum of 1.15%. The FDIC has not announced how it will implement this offset. In addition to the statutory minimum ratio, the FDIC must set a designated reserve ratio or DRR, which may exceed the statutory minimum. The FDIC has set 2.0% as the DRR.

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC has adopted final regulations under which insurance premiums are based on an institution's average consolidated total assets minus its tangible equity instead of its deposits. While our FDIC insurance premiums initially may be reduced by these regulations, it is possible that our future insurance premiums will increase under the final regulations. See “- How we are Regulated” and “Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC.”

Strong competition within our market areas may limit our growth and profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. We compete with numerous commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, securities brokers, and investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. Because of the many recent bank failures in Georgia and Florida, a number of new competitors that have acquired failed banks have entered our primary market areas. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have, have greater name recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting business, and offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more aggressively than we do. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our market area. The greater resources and deposit and loan products offered by some of our competitors may limit our ability to increase our core deposits and interest earning assets.

Our accounting policies and methods impact how we report our financial condition and results of operations. Application of these policies and methods may require management to make estimates about matters that are uncertain.

Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. Our management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods so they comply with generally accepted accounting principles and reflect management’s judgment of the most appropriate manner to report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in our reporting materially different amounts than would have been reported under a different alternative. These accounting policies are critical to presenting our financial condition and results of operations. They may require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions.

Our controls and procedures may be ineffective.

We regularly review and update our internal controls, disclosure controls, and procedures and corporate governance policies and procedures. As a result, we may incur increased costs to maintain and improve our controls and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of our controls or procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

System failure or breaches of our network security could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.

The computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, or a similar catastrophic event, as well as from security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms, and other disruptive problems caused by hackers. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Computer break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us and cause existing and potential customers to refrain from doing business with us.

Although we, with the help of third-party service providers, intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures to prevent such damage, there can be no assurance that these security measures will be successful. In addition, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we and our third-party service providers use to encrypt and protect customer transaction data. A failure of such security measures could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition and results of operations.

The Implementation of our stock-based incentive plan may dilute stockholders’ ownership interests.

As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 58,956 restricted shares and 117,673 stock options reserved for future awards under our two equity incentive plans. These stock-based incentive plans may be funded either through open market purchases or from the issuance of authorized but unissued shares of Heritage common stock. While our intention is to fund this plan through open market purchases, stockholders would experience approximately a 2.0% reduction in ownership interest in the event 176,629 newly issued shares of our common stock are issued upon exercise of stock options or issued as restricted stock under these plans.

Additional compensation and benefit expenses associated with the implementation of our stock-based incentive benefit plans will affect our profitability adversely.

As awards are granted under our two equity incentive plans, our non-interest expenses are likely to increase as we will recognize additional annual employee compensation and benefit expenses related to the shares granted to employees, executives and directors under these plans. We cannot predict the actual amount of these new stock-related compensation and benefit expenses because applicable accounting practices require that expenses be based on the fair market value of the shares of common stock at specific points in the future; however, we expect them to be material. In addition, we will recognize expense for our employee stock ownership plan when shares are committed to be released to participants’ accounts (i.e., as the loan used to acquire these shares is repaid), and we will recognize expense for restricted stock awards and stock options over the vesting period of awards made to recipients.

Our common stock trading volume may not provide adequate liquidity for investors.

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market. However, the average daily trading volume in our common stock is less than that of many larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired depth, liquidity, and orderliness depends on the presence of a sufficient number of willing buyers and sellers for our common stock at any given time. This presence is impacted by general economic and market conditions and investors’ views of our Company. Because our trading volume is limited, any significant sale of our shares is subject to significant volatility in the price of our common stock.

The ownership interest of management and employees could enable insiders to prevent a merger that may provide stockholders a premium for their shares.

Our directors and executive officers own 473,521 shares, or 5.4%, of the Company’s common stock and options for an additional 606,695 shares. In addition, our employee stock ownership plan owns 7.5% of the outstanding shares of Heritage common stock. This may result in management, directors, and employees controlling a significant percentage of shares of Heritage common stock. If these individuals were to act together, they could have significant influence over the outcome of any stockholder vote. This voting power may discourage a potential sale of Heritage that its public stockholders may desire.

Various factors may make takeover attempts more difficult to achieve.

Provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, federal regulations, Georgia and Maryland law, and various other factors may make it more difficult for companies or persons to acquire control of Heritage without the consent of our Board of Directors. Stockholders may want a takeover attempt to succeed because, for example, a potential acquiror could offer a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Description of Properties

At December 31, 2011, we had 22 full-service offices, 11 mortgage loan production offices, one loan production office, and three investment offices. At December 31, 2011, 20 full-service offices were owned by HeritageBank while two full-service offices were leased, and five mortgage loan production offices and two investment offices were located in existing full-service offices while six mortgage loan production offices, one loan production office, and one investment office were leased. In 2011, we opened ten mortgage loan production offices and completed the construction of a full-service office located in Lee County, Georgia. In the second quarter of 2011, we purchased four new full-service offices from the FDIC in connection with our purchase of a failed bank in southeast Georgia, west of Savannah, through an FDIC-assisted transaction. In August 2011, we acquired one new full-service office through our purchase of a failed bank in Statesboro, Georgia through an FDIC-assisted transaction. We will not exercise our option to purchase the property at appraised value from the FDIC during the first quarter of 2012. Also in 2011, we began the construction of a full-service office located in Valdosta, Georgia, which is expected to be placed into service in 2012.

At December 31, 2011, one of our branch locations was held for sale. We operate a full service branch at this location; however, we have excess office space at this location that we no longer use. When this location is sold, we plan to leaseback the portion of the building needed for our branch or relocate by purchasing or leasing office space in the area. For more information on our fixed assets, see Item 8 - Note 8 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Location

Owned or Leased

Net Book Value at

December 31, 2011

		(In thousands)
MAIN OFFICE:
721 North Westover Boulevard
Albany, GA 31721	Owned	$4,340

GEORGIA FULL-SERVICE OFFICES:
Downtown(1)
310 West Oglethorpe Boulevard
Albany, GA 31701	Owned	1,080
East Albany
200 Loftus Drive
Albany GA 31705	Owned	592
Lee County
104 Heritage Ln
Leesburg, GA 31763	Owned	3,026
Sylvester
504 North Main Street
Sylvester, GA 31791	Owned	725
Reidsville
104 North Main Street
Reidsville, Georgia 30453	Owned	967
Collins
204 SW Main Street
Collins, Georgia 30421	Owned	120
Adel
301 W. Fourth Street
Adel, Georgia 31620	Owned	1,149
Baxley
198 East Parker Street
Baxley, Georgia 31513	Owned	298
Hazlehurst
22 East Jarman Street
Hazlehurst, Georgia 31539	Owned	227
Statesboro - Main Street
335 South Main Street
Statesboro, Georgia 30458	Owned	1,168
Statesboro - Main Street (3)
202 South Main Street
Statesboro, Georgia 30458	Leased
Statesboro - Northside Drive
726 Northside Drive
Statesboro, Georgia 30458	Owned	433
Springfield
802 South Laurel St
Springfield, GA 31329	Owned	1,151
Rincon
600 S Columbia Ave
Rincon, GA 31326	Owned	561
Guyton
109 W Central Ave
Guyton, GA 31312	Owned	350
Port Wentworth
7224 Hwy 21
Port Wentworth, GA	Owned	936
Valdosta (4)
3277 Inner Perimeter Road
Valdosta, GA 31604	Owned	1,546

Location

Owned or Leased

Net Book Value at

December 31, 2011

Valdosta
103 Roosevelt Drive
Valdosta, Georgia 31602	Leased	-
Valdosta Loan Production Office
2935 North Ashley Street
Valdosta, Georgia 30253	Leased	-

GEORGIA MORTGAGE LOAN PRODUCTION OFFICES:
McDonough Mortgage Loan Production Office
2220 Keys Ferry Court
McDonough, Georgia 30253	Leased	-
Macon Mortgage Loan Production Office
3200 Riverside Dr
Macon, Georgia 31210	Leased	-
Gainesville Mortgage Loan Production Office
643 EE Butler Parkway
Gainesville, GA 30501	Leased	-
LaGrange Mortgage Loan Production Office
104 Greenville St
LaGrange, GA 30241	Leased	-
Warner Robins Mortgage Loan Production Office
339 Margie Drive
Warner Robins, GA 31088	Leased	-
Alpharetta Mortgage Loan Production Office
11675 Rainwater Dr
Alpharetta, GA 30009	Leased	-
Albany Investment Center
2829 Old Dawson Rd
Albany, GA 31707	Leased	-

FLORIDA FULL-SERVICE OFFICES:
Ocala-Heath Brook
4726 SW College Road
Ocala, Florida 34474	Owned	3,091
Ocala-Boulevard(2)
1409 East Silver Springs Boulevard
Ocala, Florida 34470	Owned	1,821
Lake City
463 West Duval Street
Lake City, FL 32055	Owned	533

____________________

(1)	This branch location is held for sale and its carrying value has been adjusted downward to reflect the anticipated sale proceeds.
(2)	The ground at this location is subject to a land lease that expires in 2072 and carries monthly rent of $1,100. The building at this location is owned by HeritageBank, and the net book value reflects the carrying value for the building.
(3)	This location is currently owned by the FDIC.
(4)	This location is under construction. Construction is expected to be completed at the end of 2012.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

��

The Company is not a party to any pending claims or lawsuits that management believes would have a material effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “HBOS.” The shares began trading on November 30, 2010. Prior to that date, the shares of common stock of the Predecessor also traded on that market under the same symbol. As of December 31, 2011, the Company estimates that it had approximately 1,825 stockholders, including approximately 845 beneficial owners holding shares in nominee or “street” name.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the shares of common stock of the Company and cash dividends paid to public stockholders, adjusted to reflect the 0.8377 exchange ratio in the second-step conversion that closed on November 30, 2010.

	High		Low		Dividends Paid Per Share(1)

2011
Fourth quarter (10/01/2011 through 12/31/2011)	$	11.93	$	10.01	$	0.03
Third quarter (07/01/2011 through 09/30/2011)		12.18		10.07		0.03
Second quarter (04/01/2011 through 06/30/2011)		12.97		11.00		0.03
First quarter (01/01/2011 through 03/31/2011)		13.52		11.15		0.03

2010
Fourth quarter (10/01/2010 through 12/31/2010)	$	12.75	$	9.32	$	0.11
Third quarter (07/01/2010 through 09/30/2010)		14.07		9.53		0.11
Second quarter (04/01/2010 through 06/30/2010)		15.52		12.92		0.11
First quarter (01/01/2010 through 03/31/2010)		14.55		9.26		0.11

________________

1. All dividends paid by the Predecessor were paid to all stockholders, except Heritage MHC, which waived the dividend.

The Company intends to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis and the continued payment of dividends also will depend on a number of factors, including our capital requirements, our financial condition and results of operations, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory limitations, and general economic conditions. On February 22, 2012 the Company announced it would pay a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share on March 23, 2012 to stockholders of record as of March 9, 2012. No assurance can be given that we will continue to pay dividends or that they will not be reduced or eliminated in the future.

The Company’s ability to pay dividends depends on the Company’s unconsolidated available funds and earnings thereon, as well as dividends from HeritageBank. Under the rules of the FRB, the Company is not permitted to pay dividends on its common stock if its stockholders’ equity would be reduced below the amount of the liquidation account established in connection with the conversion. Similarly, HeritageBank will not be permitted to pay dividends to the Company, its sole stockholder, if HeritageBank’s stockholder’s equity would be reduced below the amount of the liquidation account established in connection with the conversion. In addition, HeritageBank will not be permitted to make a capital distribution if, after making such distribution, capital would be below regulatory capital guidelines or if it does not receive FRB authorization to pay the dividend. Georgia law and regulations imposes limits on dividend payments by HeritageBank and certain levels of dividends require the prior approval of the GDBF. See Item 1 – Business – Limitations on Dividends and other Capital Distributions.

Maryland law generally limits dividends by Heritage to an amount equal to the excess of our capital surplus over payments that would be owed upon dissolution to stockholders whose preferential rights upon dissolution are superior to those receiving the dividend, and to an amount that would not make us insolvent. Finally, pursuant to FRB regulations, during the three-year period following the conversion, we may not take any action to declare an extraordinary dividend to stockholders that would be treated by recipients as a tax-free return of capital for federal income tax purposes.

The Company has two equity incentive plans providing for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock, restricted share units and stock appreciation rights. The first is a plan that originally was adopted by the Predecessor in May 2006 and became the Company’s plan in the second-step conversion, when awards and available shares under the plan were adjusted to reflect the 0.8377 exchange ratio. In June 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the second equity incentive plan, which reserved an additional 573,481 shares of common stock for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock, restricted share units and stock appreciation rights. The following table includes certain information with respect to certain awards and remaining shares available for awards under these equity incentive plans as of December 31, 2011:

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		738,560	$	13.51		117,673
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		-		-		-

Total		738,560	$	13.51		117,673

In July 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to 163,852 shares. Under this program 116,942 shares were repurchased during 2011 at a cost of $1.3 million. The program will expire in July 2012 unless completed sooner or otherwise extended. In December 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized another stock repurchase program. The program authorizes the Company to repurchase up to 435,000 shares. Under this program the Company did not repurchase any shares during 2011. The program will expire in December 2012 unless completed sooner or otherwise extended. Information on the shares repurchased during 2011 is as follows:

Information on the shares purchased during 2011 is a follows:

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July		-	$	-		-		163,852
August		88,833		11.25		88,833		75,019
September		28,000		11.05		28,000		47,019
October		-		-		-		47,019
November		-		-		-		47,019
December		109	$	10.98		109		481,910
Total		116,833	$	$11.15		116,833		481,910

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY

The summary financial information presented below is derived in part from the consolidated financial statements of Heritage and its subsidiary. The information at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements of Heritage that are included in Item 8. The information at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, is derived in part from audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Form 10-K. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the operations for the unaudited periods have been made. The following information is only a summary, and you should read it in conjunction with Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 - Consolidated Financial Statements.

	December 31,
	2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
	(In thousands)
Selected Financial Condition Data:

Total assets	$	1,089,852	$	755,436	$	571,948	$	502,058	$	468,672
Loans, net		553,126		410,896		328,078		297,537		300,257
Securities available for sale, at fair value:
U.S. government and agency securities and U.S Treasury Securities		45,737		89,032		30,462		21,165		14,996
Corporate and other debt securities		1,956		1,700		1,910		1,789		3,854
Mortgage-backed securities		162,963		128,143		58,410		65,408		55,598
State and municipal		48,204		19,160		29,122		27,511		31,878
Equity and other investments		157		342		621		268		1,540
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		4,067		3,703		3,253		3,186		2,970
Other equity securities, at cost		1,010		1,010		1,010		1,010		-
Deposits		884,187		534,243		426,607		338,546		330,629
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		35,000		62,500		42,500		52,500		50,000
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		35,049		32,421		32,843		41,497		15,288
Stockholders’ equity		124,136		119,340		60,817		62,213		65,592

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
	(In thousands)
Selected Operations Data:

Total interest income	$	39,449		$	28,439		$	23,401		$	27,195		$	27,997
Total interest expense		10,350			8,274			8,793			12,494			13,462
Net interest income		29,099			20,165			14,608			14,701			14,535
Provision for loan losses		2,800			5,500			7,500			3,350			1,178
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		26,204			14,665			7,108			11,351			13,357
Fees and service charges		7,811			6,177			4,953			5,245			5,129
Impairment loss on securities		(43	)		-			-			(3,119	)		-
Gain (loss) on sales of investment securities		684			294			909			235			(355	)
Life insurance proceeds		32			916			-			-			-
Bargain purchase gain		4,217			2,722			-			-			-
Other noninterest income		4,766			2,375			1,925			2,227			1,916
Total noninterest income		17,467			12,484			7,787			4,588			6,690
Total noninterest expense		38,746			26,049			18,271			17,429			17,976
Income before tax expense (benefit)		4,925			1,099			(3,376	)		(1,490	)		2,071
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,100			(307	)		(1,724	)		(1,228	)		(850	)
Net income (loss)	$	3,825		$	1,406		$	(1,652	)	$	(262	)	$	2,921

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:

Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets		0.39	%		0.22	%		(0.34	%)		(0.05	%)		0.66	%
Return on average equity		3.12	%		2.09	%		(2.62	%)		(0.41	%)		4.55	%
Dividend payout ratio		25.80	%		49.08	%	NM			NM				26.12	%
Net interest spread		3.58	%		3.55	%		3.31	%		3.16	%		3.22	%
Net interest margin		3.62	%		3.66	%		3.49	%		3.45	%		3.70	%
Operating expense to average total assets(1)		3.92	%		4.04	%		3.72	%		3.55	%		4.05	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		103.63	%		107.36	%		108.97	%		110.34	%		114.66	%
Efficiency ratio		83.21	%		79.79	%		81.59	%		90.36	%		84.69	%
Total loans to total deposits		63.41	%		78.43	%		78.32	%		89.35	%		92.15	%

Asset Quality Ratios (excluding Loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions) (1) :
Nonperforming assets to total assets at end of period		0.95	%		1.80	%		1.81	%		1.87	%		0.76	%
Nonperforming assets and troubled debt restructurings to total assets at end of period		1.53	%		2.67	%		2.35	%		1.87	%		0.76	%
Nonperforming loans to total loans		1.62	%		2.49	%		2.53	%		2.41	%		1.05	%
Nonperforming loans and troubled debt restructurings to total loans		3.06	%		4.14	%		3.48	%		2.41	%		1.05	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		106.40	%		81.79	%		71.61	%		67.99	%		137.49	%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.72	%		2.04	%		1.81	%		1.64	%		1.45	%
Net charge offs to average loans outstanding(1)		0.91	%		0.87	%		2.13	%		1.58	%		0.29	%

Capital Ratios:
Tangible equity to total assets at end of period		10.95	%		15.41	%		10.36	%		12.19	%		13.78	%
Equity to total assets at end of period		11.39	%		15.80	%		10.63	%		12.39	%		14.00	%
Average equity to average assets		12.42	%		10.46	%		12.84	%		13.05	%		14.47	%

Common Share Data and Other Ratios:
Gross shares outstanding at year-end(3)		8,712,031			8,710,511			9,595,303			9,593,628			9,586,406
Less treasury stock(3)		-			-			883,843			832,253			515,967
Net shares outstanding at year-end(3)		8,712,031			8,710,511			8,711,460			8,761,375			9,070,439
Shares owned by Heritage, MHC(2) (3)		-			-			6,591,756			6,591,756			6,591,756
Public shares outstanding(3)		8,712,031			8,710,511			2,119,704			2,169,619			2,478,683
Unearned ESOP shares(3)		439,138			492,320			203,045			239,963			276,880

Book value per share(3)	$	15.01		$	14.52		$	7.14		$	7.30		$	7.46
Tangible book value per share(3)	$	14.42		$	14.17		$	6.96		$	7.18		$	7.35
Basic income (loss) per share(3)	$	0.47		$	0.17		$	(0.20	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.34
Diluted income (loss) per share(3)	$	0.47		$	0.17		$	(0.20	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.34

Cash dividends paid on public shares outstanding	$	986,434		$	690,125		$	720,775		$	786,914		$	762,971
Cash dividends paid to Heritage MHC(2)		-			30,600			-			-			42,900
Cash dividends waived by Heritage MHC		-			2,802,195			2,518,040			2,203,285			1,845,630
Pro forma cash dividends that would have been paid without waiver(2)(3)	$	986,434		$	3,522,920		$	3,238,765		$	2,990,199		$	2,651,501
Cash dividends per share (excluding shares held by Heritage MHC)(2)(3)	$	0.12		$	0.43		$	0.32		$	0.33		$	0.29
Pro forma cash dividends per share (on all outstanding shares with no waiver by Heritage MHC) (3)	$	0.12		$	0.08		$	0.08		$	0.07		$	0.08

Other Data:
Number of full-service offices		22			16			10			8			7
Mortgage loan production offices		11			1			-			-			-

________________

1. Loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions are recorded in our assets at a discount from the contractual principal value. See Item 8 – Notes 2 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. Effective November 30, 2010, Heritage MHC was eliminated in the second-step conversion, and all dividends declared from that date are paid to all stockholders.

3. All prior year common share data and per share calculations have been adjusted to reflect the 0.8377 share exchange.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

Heritage Financial Group, Inc. (“Heritage” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation that was organized in 2010 to become the holding company of HeritageBank after the completion of a second-step conversion and related public offering. In the conversion, Heritage succeeded to all of the business and operations of Heritage Financial Group and Heritage MHC, which merged into the Company and thereby converted from a mutual holding company structure to a stock holding company structure. Its stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “HBOS.”

The principal business of Heritage is operating its wholly owned subsidiary, HeritageBank. On an unconsolidated basis, Heritage has no significant assets, other than 100% of the outstanding common stock of HeritageBank, the liquid assets it acquired with the net proceeds it retained from the offering and the loan to the employee stock ownership plan and certain liquid assets, and it has no significant liabilities. Heritage uses staff and offices of HeritageBank and pays HeritageBank for these services. If Heritage expands or changes its business in the future, it may hire its own employees. In the future, it may pursue other business activities, including mergers and acquisitions, investment alternatives and diversification of operations. There are, however, no current understandings or agreements for these activities.

HeritageBank was originally chartered in 1955 as a federal credit union, serving the Marine Corps Logistic Base in Albany, Georgia. Over the years, it evolved into a full-service, multi-branch community credit union in Dougherty, Lee, Mitchell and Worth counties in Georgia. It was converted from a federal credit union charter to a federal mutual savings bank in July 2001. The objective of that charter conversion was to better serve customers and the local community though the broader lending ability of a savings bank and to expand our customer base beyond the limited field of membership permitted for credit unions. In February 2002, HeritageBank converted to stock form in a reorganization into a two-tier mutual holding company structure, which was eliminated in the second-step conversion. On January 1, 2005, HeritageBank converted to a Georgia-chartered stock savings bank because that charter best suited continued efforts to grow and expand our commercial business. We now operate from 22 full-service branch locations, 11 mortgage production offices, and 3 investment offices located throughout Georgia and Florida market footprint.

The principal business of HeritageBank consists of attracting retail and commercial deposits from the general public and investing those funds primarily in permanent loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences, multifamily residences and commercial property, and a variety of consumer and commercial business loans. Revenues from this business are derived principally from interest on loans and securities and fee income.

HeritageBank offers a variety of deposit accounts having a wide range of interest rates and terms, which generally include savings accounts, money market deposit, term certificate accounts, and checking accounts. The Bank solicits deposits in our market areas.

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans and investments, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, consisting of savings and checking accounts, money market accounts, time deposits, federal funds purchased, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and borrowings. Our results of operations also are affected by our provisions for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense. Noninterest income consists primarily of service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage banking income, transaction fees, bank-owned life insurance, commissions from investment services, and net accretion for the FDIC loss-share receivable. Noninterest expense consists primarily of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment and data processing, advertising, professional fees and other costs. Our results of operations also may be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

HeritageBank is subject to extensive regulation by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance and the FDIC. As the holding company of HeritageBank, the Company is subject to regulation by the GDBF and the FRB.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have established certain accounting and financial reporting policies to govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in Item 8 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management which has a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions made by management, actual results could differ from the judgments and estimates adopted by management, which could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the results of our operations. We believe the following accounting policies applied by us represent critical accounting policies. For more information on our accounting policies, see Item 8 - Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Acquisition Accounting. GAAP requires the use of fair value accounting in determining the carrying values of certain assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and accordingly we recorded assets purchased and liabilities assumed in our FDIC-assisted acquisitions at their fair values. The fair value of the loan portfolios acquired in these transactions was recorded and is being accounted for under the principles prescribed by ASC 310.

On the date of acquisition all loans acquired are assigned a fair value based on the present value of projected future cash flows. An accretable discount is determined based on the timing of the projected cash flows and is taken into income over the projected life of the loans. Such accretion is included in interest income. Expected cash flows are re-estimated at each reporting date. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses.

Because we record loans acquired in connection with FDIC-assisted acquisitions at fair value, we record no allowance for loan losses related to the acquired covered loans on the acquisition date, given that the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk.

FDIC Receivable for Loss-Share Agreements. A significant portion of our loan and other real estate assets are covered under loss share agreements with the FDIC in which the FDIC has agreed to reimburse us 80% of all losses as well as certain expenses incurred in connection with those assets. We estimated the amount that we will receive from the FDIC under the loss share agreements that will result from losses incurred as we dispose of covered loans and other real estate assets, and we recorded the estimate as a receivable from the FDIC. We discounted the receivable for the expected timing and receipt of those cash flows using a risk free rate plus a premium for risk. The accretion of the FDIC receivable discount is recorded into noninterest income using the level yield method over the estimated life of the receivable.

The loss-share agreements also include a provision whereby if our losses do not exceed a calculated threshold, we are obligated to compensate the FDIC. This is referred as a clawback liability and, if applicable, is paid at the end of ten years. The formula for the clawback liability varies from transaction-to-transaction and will be calculated using the formula provided in the individual loss-sharing agreements and will not be consolidated into one calculation. The FDIC receivable for loss-sharing agreements is measured separately from the related covered assets because it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable if we sell the assets. We will review and update the fair value of the FDIC receivable at each reporting date in conjunction with the re-estimation of cash flows. The FDIC receivable will fluctuate as loss estimates and expected cash flows related to covered loans and other real estate owned change.

Allowance for Loan Losses (ALLL). The Company establishes provisions for loan losses, which are charged to operations, at a level we believe will reflect probable credit losses based on historical loss trends and an evaluation of specific credits in the loan portfolio.

In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, we consider the types and amount of loans in the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, and past due status and trends.

We analyze the non-FDIC acquired loan portfolios through the use of pools of homogenous loan types and through a specific quarterly review of larger problem loans. It is expected that a certain percentage of loans will move through the asset quality grades from pass, to classified, and ultimately loss. See Item 8 - Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on asset quality grade. We evaluate our non-FDIC loan portfolio through review of four loan pool categories.

Pass credits with risk ratings 1-4

Other assets especially mentioned with risk rating 5

Substandard with risk rating 6 and still accruing

Impaired Loans – Nonaccrual and troubled debt restructures

The allowance consists of two components:

A general amount – We analyze the historical migration of loans through each risk rating category and analyze the history of losses as it relates to the various loan types and collateral types in order to evaluate and estimate the volume and magnitude of the expected loss. These risk factors and other factors are applied to our review of the loan Pass credits within the risk ratings 1-4 pool and other assets especially mentioned within the risk rating 5 pool. These factors are applied to the substandard pool; however, in addition to reviewing the pool, a select group of individual loans are reviewed individually. The results of the individual reviews are factored in with the historical loss analysis and applied to the pool.

A specific amount – Impaired loans are reviewed individually for specific amounts that are representative of identified credit exposures that are readily predictable by the current performance of the borrower and underlying collateral.

Even though the ALLL is composed of two components, the entire ALLL is available to absorb any credit losses.

The Company assesses the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and makes provisions for loan losses as necessary in order to maintain the proper level of allowance. While the Company uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future loan loss provisions may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additional provisions based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that represents management's best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio, with such losses being both probable and reasonably estimable. The level of the allowance is based on estimates and the ultimate losses may vary from the estimates.

Income Taxes. The calculation of our income tax expense requires significant judgment and the use of estimates. We periodically assess tax positions based on current tax developments, including enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. In analyzing our overall tax position, we consider the amount and timing of recognizing income tax liabilities and benefits. In applying the tax and accounting guidance to the facts and circumstances, we adjust income tax balances appropriately through the income tax provision. We maintain reserves for income tax uncertainties at levels we believe are adequate to absorb probable payments. Actual amounts paid, if any, could differ significantly from income tax estimates.

Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. In addition, the tax treatment of FDIC-assisted acquisitions is complex and subject to interpretations that may result in future adjustments of deferred taxes. We assess deferred tax assets based on expected realizations, and we establish a valuation allowance for any amounts we do not expect to realize. No valuation allowance is currently recorded.

Estimates of Fair Value. The estimation of fair value is significant to a number of Heritage’s assets, including, but not limited to, investment securities, goodwill, other real estate owned and other repossessed assets. These are all recorded at either fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. Fair values are volatile and may be influenced by a number of factors. Circumstances that could cause estimates of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities to change include a change in prepayment speeds, discount rates, or market interest rates. Our estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period in which they are determined to be necessary.

Fair values for most investment securities are based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on the quoted prices of similar instruments. The fair values of other real estate owned typically are determined based on appraisals by third parties, less estimated costs to sell. Estimates of fair value also are required in performing an impairment analysis of goodwill. Heritage reviews goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis and whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment would be applicable if the carrying value exceeds the fair value of a reporting unit.

Recent Accounting Standards

For discussion of Recent Accounting Standards, please see Item 8 - Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Evolution of Business Strategy

Our current business strategy is to operate a well-capitalized and profitable commercial and retail financial institution dedicated to serving the needs of our customers. We strive to be the primary financial institution in the market areas we serve. We offer a broad range of products and services while stressing personalized and efficient customer service and convenient access to these products and services. We intend to continue to operate as a commercial and consumer lender. We have structured operations around a branch system that is staffed with knowledgeable and well-trained employees. Subject to capital requirements and our ability to grow in a reasonable and prudent manner, we may open or acquire additional branches as opportunities arise. In addition to our branch system, we continue to expand electronic services for our customers. We attempt to differentiate ourselves from our competitors by providing a higher level of customer service.

Expansion Efforts. A key element of our business strategy is increasing our presence and growing the “Heritage” brand in the markets we currently serve and expanding our operations beyond our original southwest Georgia market by entering new markets in other parts of southern and central Georgia, north central Florida and other adjacent communities that present attractive opportunities for expansion consistent with our capital availability.

During 2011, we made two assisted transactions under loss-share agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), which significantly increased our asset size and deposit base. In each of these transactions, we entered into a loss-share agreement under which the FDIC will reimburse us for 80% of the losses on covered loans and other real estate owned. We also expanded out Georgia footprint in 2011 by opening up mortgage production offices in Alpharetta, Gainesville, LaGrange, and Macon.

In February 2011, we acquired four branch offices west of Savannah, in Springfield, Guyton, Rincon, and Port Wentworth, Georgia, through an FDIC-assisted transaction. In that acquisition, we acquired $215.0 million in assets, including $139.2 million in loans with a fair value of $72.7 million and assumed $212.5 million of the liabilities, including $206.3 million in deposits of the former Citizens Bank of Effingham. Under the loss-share agreement, the FDIC will provide reimbursement for losses on $152.9 million of covered loans and other real estate owned acquired in the acquisition. The $215.0 million of acquired assets were purchased at a $25.1 million discount, which was approximately 11.7% of assets acquired and a 16.4% discount to covered assets. This acquisition expanded our footprint into the Savannah, Georgia market.

In August 2011, we acquired one branch office in Statesboro, Georgia, through an FDIC-assisted transaction. In that acquisition, we acquired $156.2 million in assets, including $108.0 million in loans with a fair value of $68.1 million and assumed $138.7 million of the liabilities, including $137.2 million in deposits of the former First Southern National Bank. Under the loss-share agreement, the FDIC will provide reimbursement for losses on $107.8 million of covered loans and other real estate owned acquired in the acquisition. The $156.2 million of acquired assets were purchased at a $16.3 million discount, which was approximately 10.4% of assets acquired and a 15.1% discount to covered assets. This acquisition expanded our footprint in the Statesboro, Georgia market.

See Item 8 - Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about these acquisitions.

We have pursued this expansion program through both prudent, disciplined internal growth and strategic acquisitions. Because many of the financial institutions in our market areas are experiencing financial difficulties, these opportunities have increased in recent months. As those troubled banks have closed or curtailed their lending activities, disposed of assets or sold branches to improve their capital levels, we have experienced increased loan demand and branch acquisition opportunities, hired highly regarded and experienced lending officers and commercial bankers and expanded into new market areas that are contiguous to our existing market areas. Our recent activities reflect our ability to take advantage of these expansion opportunities.

Our community banking philosophy emphasizes personalized service and building broad and deep customer relationships, which has provided us with a substantial base of lower cost core deposits. Our newer markets are managed by senior level, experienced decision makers in a decentralized structure that differentiates us from many of our larger competitors. We believe this structure, which includes involvement and knowledge of local markets with prudent oversight and direction from our home office, will continue to provide growth and assist us in managing risk.

We plan to continue a long-term strategy of expanding and diversifying our franchise in terms of revenue, profitability, asset size and location. We anticipate continuing consolidation in the financial services industry in our market areas and will seek to enhance our franchise through future acquisitions of whole banks or branches, including in FDIC-assisted transactions.

Core Business. Our core business is composed of the following:

Commercial Banking and Small Business Lending. We focus on the commercial real estate and business needs of individuals and small to medium-sized businesses in our market area. In addition, we focus on high net worth individuals and small business owners. The commercial banking department is composed of seasoned commercial lenders and a support staff with extensive commercial banking experience.

Retail Banking. We currently operate a network of 22 branches located in southern and central Georgia and north central Florida. Each office is staffed with knowledgeable banking professionals who strive to deliver quality service.

Mortgage Lending. Staffed with experienced mortgage originators and processors, our mortgage lending department originates residential mortgage loans that are primarily sold in the secondary market through 11 production offices throughout central and southern Georgia and north central Florida. We collect a fee on the origination of these loans. We opened ten new mortgage production offices in 2011 and hired experienced mortgage sales and operation managers and originators both within and outside of our branch network.

Brokerage/Investment Services. We offer investment products, life, health, disability and long-term care insurance through our brokerage department. We also added two advisors in 2011 to better serve our market footprint.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

General. Total assets increased by $334.4 million, or 44.3%, to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2011, from $755.4 million at December 31, 2010. Cash and due from banks increased $5.7 million, or 19.9%, to $34.5 million at December 31, 2011 from $28.8 million at December 31, 2010. Total interest-earning assets increased $220.7 million, or 32.9%, to $891.9 million at December 31, 2011, from $671.2 million at December 31, 2010. Loans, including loans held for sale, increased $149.1 million, and securities available for sale increased $20.6 million, federal funds increased $19.0 million and interest-bearing deposits in banks increased $32.1 million. At the same time, deposits increased by $350.0 million, borrowings decreased by $24.9 million, and stockholders’ equity increased by $4.8 million.

Cash and Securities. We decreased our liquidity position as a percentage of total assets to utilize excess liquidity to grow interest earning assets primarily through FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2011 but did increase the liquidity position on an aggregate basis. Cash and securities (including bank deposits and federal funds sold) increased in the aggregate $77.6 million, or 27.6%, to $358.4 million, or 32.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2011, from $280.8 million, or 37.2% of total assets, at December 31, 2010.

	At December 31,				Amount		Percent
	2011		2010		Change		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and due from banks	$	34,521	$	28,803	$	5,718		19.85	%
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		43,101		10,912		32,189		294.99
Federal funds sold		21,753		2,700		19,053		705.67
Securities available for sale, at fair value		259,017		238,377		20,640		8.66
Total	$	358,392	$	280,792	$	77,600		27.64	%

The increase in cash and due from banks was primarily the result of our increased branch network and customer base as compared to the prior year. The increase in interest-bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold was the result of the cash and cash equivalents acquired through the FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2011 coupled with our success in liquidating some of the FDIC-assisted acquired assets during the year. The increase in securities available for sale was the result of $35.7 million in securities acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2011 partially offset by a reduction in those investment portfolios prior to year-end.

At December 31, 2011, our securities portfolio consisted of $45.7 million in U.S. Government agency securities, $163.0 million U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities, $48.2 million in state and municipal securities, and $2.1 million in corporate debt and equity securities. These corporate debt and equity securities had a net unrealized loss based on fair value of $254,000. We currently intend on holding these securities to maturity. Based on our quarterly impairment analysis of these securities, one corporate equity security was other than temporarily impaired through non-interest income by $43,000 at December 31, 2011. We believe it is probable that we will be able to collect the amounts due under the contractual terms of the remainder of the securities portfolio. Therefore we do not believe any other securities expressed other than temporary impairment at December 31, 2011. See Item 8 - Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our securities portfolio and impairment analysis at December 31, 2011.

We expect to continue gradually lowering our excess liquidity balance on a percent of total assets basis in cash, funds due from banks, federal funds sold, and securities in 2012. We believe that utilizing some of our excess liquidity to increase our loan portfolio or fund deposit run-off is a prudent strategy to maintain through 2012.

Loans. Our loan portfolio increased $141.6 million, or 33.8%, to $560.6 million at December 31, 2011, from $419.0 million at December 31, 2010. Overall, this increase reflects an increase in loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions of $104.8 million and organic loan growth across our market footprint of $36.8 million.

The following table reflects the changes in the types of loans in our portfolio at the end of 2011 as compared to the end of 2010.

	December 31,				Amount			Percentage
	2011		2010		Change			Change
Commercial real estate:
Non Residential	$	138,970	$	110,079	$	28,891			26.25	%
Multifamily		15,797		13,598		2,199			16.17
Farmland		17,921		12,339		5,582			45.24
Total commercial real estate loans		172,688		136,016		36,672			26.96

Construction and land		26,804		24,522		2,282			9.31

Consumer real estate:
Mortgage loans, 1-4 families		129,745		131,293		(1,548	)		(1.18	)
Home equity		26,154		26,091		63			0.24
Total consumer real estate loans		155,899		157,384		(1,485	)		(0.94	)

Consumer and other:
Indirect auto loans		3,741		8,646		(4,905	)		(56.73	)
Direct auto loans		6,430		8,446		(2,016	)		(23.87	)
Other		13,701		10,023		3,678			36.70
Total consumer loans		23,872		27,115		(3,243	)		(11.96	)

Commercial and industrial loans		55,179		52,589		2,590			4.92

		434,442		397,626		36,816			9.26
Loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions
Non-Covered		18,721		21,371		(2,650	)		(12.40	)
Covered		107,457		-		107,457			100.00
Total loans	$	560,620	$	418,997	$	141,623			33.80	%

Overall the change in the loan portfolio is consistent with our strategy to grow our loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions and organically grow our nonresidential commercial real estate lending. The increase in commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans reflects our continued emphasis on commercial lending. The increase in farmland loans reflects solid growth in our southeast and southwest Georgia agricultural markets. The increase in multifamily mortgages reflects an increased emphasis on lending in this area. The decreases in consumer real estate and consumer and other loans reflect the continued downward pressure experienced throughout our market footprint as a result of the economic recession.

Due to our renewed focus on finding new lending relationships from high-quality borrowers in 2011, we expanded our core loan portfolio by $36.8 million. We also see more opportunities to take market share from the regional and community banks competing within our market footprint. We continue to seek opportunities to grow our loan portfolio through organic growth, branch acquisitions, loan purchases, FDIC-assisted opportunities, and whole bank acquisitions.

At December 31, 2011, we had approximately $7.5 million in loans held for sale, which are mortgage loans generated to be sold to investors, and compares to $225,000 at the end of 2010. The increase was driven by our 2011 expansion of ten mortgage loan production offices. We typically hold these loans for thirty days and earn the stated rate on the note until they are purchased by the investor.

Delinquencies and Nonperforming Assets. As of December 31, 2011, our total loans delinquent for 30 to 89 days was $371,000 or 0.09% of total loans, excluding FDIC-assisted acquired loans.

At December 31, 2011, our nonperforming assets totaled $10.4 million, or 0.95% of total assets, compared to $13.6 million, or 1.80% of total assets at December 31, 2010. This $3.2 million, or 23.5% decrease is the result of improvement in our ability to resolve problem assets and improvement in our nonperforming trends.

Our loan portfolio has included loans acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions since December 2009, which are generally recorded in our assets at a deep discount from the contractual principal value and accounted for under ASC 310-30. See Item 8 - Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions are excluded from the delinquent loan tables below because they are accounted for in a different manner. See Item 8 – Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. At December 31, 2011, we had troubled debt restructurings totaling $10.4 million, which involve forgiving a portion of interest or principal on loans or making loans at a rate materially below market. Included in nonperforming loans at December 31, 2011, are troubled debt restructurings of $4.2 million.

The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of non-performing assets in our loan portfolio, excluding loans and foreclosed assets acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, at the dates indicated.

	Non-performing Assets at December 31,
	2011		2010		Amount Change			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accruing loans	$	7,043	$	9,905	$	(2,862	)		(28.89	)%
Foreclosed assets		3,356		3,689		(333	)		(9.03	)
Total	$	10,399	$	13,594	$	(3,195	)		(23.50	)%

Non-performing loans to total loans decreased to 1.62% of total loans at the end of 2011 from 2.49% at the end of 2010.

At December 31, 2011, our largest non-performing loan was $1.9 million secured by residential and commercial properties throughout southwest Georgia. The remainder of our non-performing loans consists of various consumer and commercial loans, none exceeding $1.0 million. Current appraisals on real estate loans, expected cost of foreclosure or other disposition, and other probable losses on these loans are considered in our analysis of the allowance for loan losses.

Foreclosed assets, excluding assets acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, decreased from $3.7 million at December 31, 2010, to $3.4 million at December 31, 2011. The Company continues to aggressively confront credit quality issues in its loan portfolio. Foreclosed assets, which consist almost entirely of OREO, experienced additions in excess of sales for 2011. However, write-downs were the primary reason for the decrease from the prior year. At December 31, 2011, our largest OREO was $1.4 million on undeveloped property in the Atlanta metropolitan market. Our next largest was $1.1 million secured by 20.1 acres of land in Ocala, Florida. We believe the current value represents our estimated disposition value based on current appraisals and market data. The remainder of our foreclosed assets consists of various properties, primarily located in southwest Georgia, with no single property having a book value greater than $1.0 million. All of these properties are being marketed actively for disposition. During 2011, we had gross proceeds on sales of OREO, excluding assets acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, of approximately $1.7 million and recorded net losses of approximately $388,000 on those sales.

Our internally criticized (watch list) and classified assets, excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, totaled $33.2 million at December 31, 2011, compared to $37.8 million at December 31, 2010. This includes loans with respect to which known information about the possible credit problems of the borrowers have caused management to have doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and which may result in the future inclusion of such items in the nonperforming asset categories. These balances include the aforementioned nonperforming loans, other real estate, and repossessed assets. These loans have been considered in management's determination of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. Our internal loan review processes strive to identify weaknesses in loans prior to performance issues. However, our processes do not always provide sufficient time to work out plans with borrowers that would avoid foreclosure and/or losses.

We continue to see weakness in our loan portfolio as economic conditions remain difficult. We expect this situation to continue until we see improvement in the overall economy. We have taken actions to prevent losses in our current portfolio, including the development of a special assets committee. We have also taken steps to better evaluate the capital and liquidity positions of our commercial loan guarantors, particularly those involved in commercial real estate construction and development.

Allowance for Loan Losses. Our allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2011 was $7.5 million compared to $8.1 million at December 31, 2010. Excluding loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.72% at December 31, 2011 and 2.04% at December 31, 2010. This decrease reflects improving credit trends in our loan portfolio; however, we are cautiously optimistic the improvement will continue into 2012.

The following table sets forth asset quality information, excluding loans acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions for the periods indicated:

	At and For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.72	%		2.04	%
Allowance for loan losses to average loans		1.32			2.03
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		106.40			81.79

Loans 30 to 89 days past due and still accruing	$	371		$	1,879

Nonaccrual loans	$	7,043		$	9,905
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing		-			-
Total non-performing loans		7,043			9,905
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		3,356			3,689
Total non-performing assets	$	10,399		$	13,594

Non-performing loans to total loans		1.62	%		2.49	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		0.95			1.80
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)		0.91			0.87
Net charge-offs	$	3,502		$	3,459

We assess the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and make provisions for loan losses as necessary in order to maintain the proper level of allowance. While we use available information to recognize losses on loans, future loan loss provisions may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require us to recognize additional provisions based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that represents management's best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio, and such losses were both probable and reasonably estimable. The level of the allowance is based on estimates and the ultimate losses may vary from the estimates.

Premises and Equipment. Premises and equipment increased $8.1 million, or 37.9%, at December 31, 2011, of which approximately $3.2 million was due to acquiring four branches in the second quarter of 2011 from the FDIC related to the FDIC-assisted acquisition of Citizens Bank of Effingham, and $2.5 million related to the construction of the Lee County, Georgia branch completed in the third quarter of 2011. In addition, we have begun construction on a new branch in Valdosta, Georgia, scheduled to open in 2012, at an approximate cost of $1.9 million.

FDIC Loss-share Receivable. The FDIC loss-share receivable was $83.9 million at December 31, 2011 and represents the present value of 80% of our expected losses and reimbursable expenses associated with the covered assets acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2011. At December 31, 2011, $3.1 million in reimbursements from the FDIC had been recorded and net accretion totaled $381,000.

Intangible Assets, Goodwill and Other Assets. Intangible assets and goodwill increased from $2.9 million by 66.5% to $4.8 million, primarily related to the core deposit intangibles recorded for our two FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2011. Additionally, we recorded $692,000 in amortization expense related to core deposit intangibles in 2011.

Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) increased from $15.0 million at December 31, 2010 to $15.6 million at December 31, 2011 as the value of those policies grew in value during 2011. Other assets increased 7.6% during 2011, primarily due to an increase in receivables from the FDIC as a result of our 2011 FDIC-assisted transactions.

Deposits. Total deposits increased $350.0 million, or 65.5%, to $884.2 million at December 31, 2011 compared with $534.2 million at December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of the two FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2011. A summary of deposit accounts with the corresponding weighted average cost of funds is presented below (in thousands).

	As of December 31, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
	Amount		Wtd. Avg. Rate			Amount		Wtd. Avg. Rate
Checking (noninterest)	$	78,823		0.00	%	$	44,769		0.00	%
NOW (interest)		151,765		0.28			109,329		1
Savings		60,552		0.16			48,762		0.22
Money Market		284,268		0.56			162,343		1.38
Certificates		308,779		1.67			169,040		1.65
Total	$	884,187		0.89	%	$	534,243		1.28	%

Borrowings and Other Liabilities. The total amount of other borrowings decreased by $27.5 million from $62.5 million at the end of 2010 to $35.0 million at the end of 2011, as we reduced borrowings with excess liquidity. The weighted average rate on these advances was 3.68% in 2011 compared to 3.70% in 2010. Federal funds purchased increased by $1.5 million and securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased by $1.1 million for a net increase of $2.6 million, or 8.1%, as a result of an increase in our Fed Funds purchased from Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia and due to the increased commercial accounts with corresponding repurchase agreements.

Equity. Total equity increased $4.8 million to $124.1 million at December 31, 2011, compared with $119.3 million at December 31, 2010, primarily driven by 2011 net income of $3.8 million. In addition, stock-based compensation of $728,000, the allocation of $620,000 in ESOP shares, and other comprehensive income of $1.8 million also increased equity, which was offset by the repurchase of common shares of $1.3 million and dividends of $987,000 paid during the year.

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid

The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates. Yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis using an assumed tax rate of 34%. Nonaccruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011								2010								2009
	Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans	$	512,956		$	33,428		6.53	%	$	379,461		$	23,800		6.28	%	$	299,399		$	18,555		6.21	%
Loans Held for Sale		4,137			297		4.00			235			10		4.26			-			-		-
Taxable investment securities		197,739			4,536		2.29			118,204			3,495		2.96			84,455			3,604		4.27
Tax-exempt investment Securities		22,424			880		5.95			24,097			960		3.98			29,883			1,174		5.95
Federal funds sold		23,563			60		0.26			17,472			45		0.26			21,102			54		0.25
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		54,867			248		0.56			26,075			129		0.50			1,931			14		0.72
Total interest-earning assets		815,686			39,449		4.89			565,544			28,439		5.03			436,770			23,401		5.50

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand		135,608			817		0.60			92,147			917		1.00			50,679			534		1.05
Savings and money market		288,378			2,368		0.82			186,870			2,030		1.09			122,453			1,553		1.27
Retail time deposits		271,634			4,178		1.54			159,366			2,554		1.60			122,332			3,788		3.10
Wholesale time deposits		11,666			187		1.60			11,293			258		2.29			17,981			597		3.32
Borrowings		79,856			2,800		3.51			77,081			2,515		3.26			87,380			2,322		2.66
Total interest- bearing liabilities		787,142			10,350		1.31			526,757			8,274		1.57			400,825			8,794		2.19

Net interest income				$	29,099							$	20,165							$	14,607
Net interest rate spread							3.58	%							3.55	%							3.31	%
Net earning assets	$	28,544							$	38,787							$	35,945
Net interest margin							3.62	%							3.66	%							3.49	%

Average interest- earning assets to average interest- bearing liabilities		1.04	x							1.07	x							1.09	x

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following schedule presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between the changes related to outstanding balances and those due to the changes in interest rates. The change in interest attributable to rate has been determined by applying the change in rate between years to average balances outstanding in the later year. The change in interest due to volume has been determined by applying the rate from the earlier year to the change in average balances outstanding between years. Changes that are not solely due to volume have been consistently attributed to rate.

	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,
	2011 vs. 2010									2010 vs. 2009									2009 vs. 2008
	Increase (Decrease) Due to						Total Increase			Increase (Decrease) Due to						Total Increase			Increase (Decrease) Due to						Total Increase
	Volume			Rate			(Decrease)			Volume			Rate			(Decrease)			Volume			Rate			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	7,579		$	2,049		$	9,628		$	4,827		$	417		$	5,244		$	(592	)	$	(1,735	)	$	(2,327	)
Loans held for sale		288			(1	)		287			10			-			10
Taxable investment securities		1,801			(760	)		1,041			1,012			(1,121	)		(109	)		(266	)		(1,020	)		(1,286	)
Tax exempt investment securities		(67	)		(13	)		(80	)		(245	)		31			(214	)		6			(8	)		(2	)
Federal funds sold		15			-			15			(10	)		2			(8	)		77			(255	)		(178	)
Interest bearing deposits with banks		102			17			119			121			(6	)		115			15			(16	)		(1	)

Total interest-earning assets	$	9,718		$	1,292		$	11,010		$	5,715		$	(677	)		5,038		$	(760	)	$	(3,034	)		(3,794	)

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Interest bearing demand		345			(445	)		(100	)		410			(27	)		383		$	81		$	(33	)	$	48
Savings and money market		991			(653	)		338			968			(490	)		478			509			(346	)		163
Retail time deposits		2,535			(911	)		1,624			(162	)		(1,072	)		(1,234	)		(148	)		(1,347	)		(1,495	)
Wholesale time deposits		(26	)		(45	)		(71	)		(187	)		(154	)		(341	)		(877	)		(410	)		(1,287	)
Borrowings		135			150			285			(146	)		340			194			(432	)		(697	)		(1,129	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	3,980			(1,904	)	$	2,076		$	883			(1,403	)		(520	)	$	(867	)	$	(2,833	)		(3,700	)

Net interest income							$	8,934								$	5,558								$	(94	)

Comparison of Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

General. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded net income of $3.8 million, or $0.47 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to a net income of $1.4 million, or $0.17 basic and diluted earnings per share, for the year ended December 31, 2010. This $2.4 million improvement in operating results reflects an increase in net interest income, a decrease in loan loss provision expense, and an increase in noninterest income, which were partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

Interest Income. Total interest income for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased $11.0 million, or 38.7%, to $39.4 million, compared to $28.4 million during 2010. The increase was due to a $250.1 million, or 44.2%, increase in average interest-earning assets during 2011 to $815.7 million, compared to $565.5 million during 2010. This increase in average interest-earning assets was due primarily to the two FDIC-assisted acquisitions completed in 2011 and, to a lesser extent, organic loan growth. This increase in the average balance of earning assets was offset by a 23 basis point decrease in yield on interest-earning assets to 4.89% during 2011 as compared to 5.12% in 2010, as a result of the effects of the rate cuts by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System since 2007.

Interest income on loans for 2011 was $33.4 million compared to $23.8 million for 2010. The $9.6 million increase in interest income on loans was primarily a result of the loans acquired in our FDIC-assisted transactions and our expansion in new markets, which is reflected in an $133.5 million increase in the average loan portfolio balance in addition to a 25 basis point increase in the weighted average yield on loans to 6.53% for 2011 compared to 6.28% in 2010.

Interest income on investment securities for 2011 was $5.4 million compared to $4.4 million in 2010. Our average taxable investment securities increased by $79.5 million to $197.7 million offset by a decrease in tax exempt securities of $1.7 million in 2011 as a result of the investment of increased liquid assets and the purchase of $35.7 million in securities through FDIC-assisted acquisitions. Tax exempt securities average yield increased by 197 basis points from 2010; however, the average yield on taxable investment securities decreased by 67 basis points to 2.29%.

Interest income on federal funds sold and bank deposits for 2011 were $308,000 compared to $174,000 in 2010. Our average federal funds sold and bank deposits increased $34.9 million to $78.4 million as a result of the growth in liquid assets from our FDIC-assisted acquisitions. The average yield on federal funds sold remained unchanged while the average yield on bank deposits increased by 6 basis points for 2011.

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased $2.1 million or 25.3% to $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $8.3 million during 2010. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 26 basis points to 1.31% during 2011 compared with 1.57% during 2010, as a result of the continued downward trends in the rate cycle. This decrease in costs was offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities during 2011 to $787.1 million, an increase of $260.3 million compared to $526.8 million during 2010 primarily driven by the deposits acquired through two FDIC-assisted acquisitions occurring in 2011. We expect the decreases in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities to slow and level off during the latter half of 2012 as we near the bottom of the current rate cycle for deposit repricing.

Interest expense on deposits for 2011 was $7.6 million compared to $5.8 million for 2010. The $1.2 million increase in interest expense on deposits was due to the deposits acquired through two FDIC-assisted acquisitions occurring in 2011 partially offset by a reduction in average deposit rates as deposits are repriced to lower market rates. The average rate paid on the deposit portfolio decreased 20 basis points from 1.28% for 2010 to 1.08% for 2011. This decrease in the rate paid on deposits was offset by a $257.6 million increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits portfolio, primarily driven by two FDIC-assisted acquisitions occurring in 2011.

Interest expense on other borrowings, consisting of FHLB advances, federal funds purchased, and securities sold under agreement to repurchase, for 2011 was $2.8 million compared to $2.5 million for 2010. This reflects a $2.8 increase in average other borrowings to $79.9 million for 2011 and an increased yield paid on these borrowings, from an average rate paid of 3.26% for 2010 compared to 3.51% for 2011. The increase in expense was the result of variable rates on the structured repurchase agreements adjusting to higher fixed rates in accordance with their contractual terms.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for 2011 increased $8.9 million or 44.3% to $29.1 million from $20.2 million for 2010, primarily due to the increase in acquired interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at a net positive spread through two FDIC-assisted acquisitions occurring in 2011. The net interest spread increased 3 basis points to 3.58% for 2011 compared with 3.55% during 2010. The net interest margin decreased 4 basis points for 2011 to 3.62% compared with 3.66% for 2010. Also see Item 7 - Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid and – Rate/Volume Analysis.

Our asset-liability management policy seeks to mitigate interest rate risk by making our balance sheet as neutral as possible to changes in interest rates. Although our goal is to be neutral to changes in rates, we will not take undue risk to achieve this goal. Therefore, we remain exposed to fluctuation in interest rates. For more information on the effect of changes in interest rates, see Item 7 - Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk.

Provision for Loan Losses. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded a $2.9 million provision for loan losses, which is a decrease of $2.6 million, or 47.3%, compared to the $5.5 million provision recorded during 2010. The primary difference in provision expense was due to improvement in the underlying credit trends in the loan portfolio. We expect improving credit trends to continue throughout 2012; however, these improving credit trends may not translate into lower provision expense.

Our loan portfolio includes $126.2 million of loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions, which are generally recorded at a deep discount and subject to accounting under ASC 310-30. These FDIC-assisted loans were not subject to provision expense for 2011, but if conditions in the portfolios deteriorated in excess of the discounts the portfolios could be subject to additional provision expense. See Item 8 – Notes 2 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our internally criticized and classified assets totaled $33.2 million at December 31, 2011, compared to $37.8 million at December 31, 2010. These balances include nonperforming loans, other real estate, and repossessed assets. Our internal loan review processes strive to identify weaknesses in loans prior to performance issues. However, our processes do not always provide sufficient time to work out plans with borrowers that would avoid foreclosure and/or losses.

We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to operations, at a level we believe will reflect probable credit losses based on historical loss trends and an evaluation of specific credits in the loan portfolio. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, we consider the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, and past due status and trends.

Noninterest Income. A summary of noninterest income, excluding securities transactions, bargain purchase gains, and gain on BOLI life insurance proceeds, follows:

	Year Ended December 30,
	2011			2010			$ Chg			% Chg
	(Dollars in thousands)

Service charges on deposit accounts	$	4,777		$	4,113		$	664			16.1	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees		3,034			2,064			970			47.0	%
Brokerage fees		1,386			1,070			316			29.5	%
Mortgage banking fees		2,285			606			1,679			277.1	%
Bank-owned life insurance		588			610			(22	)		(3.6	)%
Accretion of FDIC loss-share receivable		381			-			381			100.0	%
Other		126			88			38			43.2	%
Total noninterest income	$	12,577		$	8,551		$	4,026			47.1	%
Noninterest income as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		1.27	%		1.33	%

The increase in service charges on deposit accounts, other service charges, commissions and fees is due primarily to the increase in new deposits accounts and new market activity from our FDIC-assisted acquisitions. Recent regulatory changes to the offering of overdraft privileges on ATM and debit cards may cause significant decreases in our overdraft fees in future periods. At this time, the overdraft income per customer account has slightly decreased but the increase in the customer-base has entirely offset the reduction in per account activity. In 2011, we established a fee income committee and continue to explore several other fee options to better diversify our deposit account service charge income.

The increase in brokerage fees during the year was due to an increase in assets under management during the year, due primarily to the increases seen in the equity markets. These fees are expected to increase in 2012 with our expanded brokerage business in the Statesboro and Ocala markets.

Mortgage banking fees increased due to our rapid expansion of opening 10 mortgage production offices in 2011 throughout our central and southern Georgia and north central Florida markets. During 2012, we expect mortgage banking fees to increase due primarily to our expansion activity.

Accretion of FDIC loss-share receivable resulted in $381,000 in noninterest income in 2011, which consisted of $903,000 in present value adjustments partially offset by $522,000 of negative accretion associated with improvement in expected cash flows associated with the loan portfolios acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions. We expect the negative accretion to outpace the present value adjustments in 2012 which will result in a net negative impact to noninterest income.

Noninterest Expense. A summary of noninterest expense follows:

	Year Ended
	December 31,
	2011			2010			$ Chg			% Chg
	(Dollars in thousands)

Salaries and employee benefits	$	20,393		$	12,676		$	7,717			60.9	%
Equipment		1,996			1,131			865			76.5	%
Occupancy		2,279			1,512			767			50.7	%
Advertising and marketing		785			593			192			32.4	%
Legal and accounting		588			616			(28	)		(4.5	)%
Directors fees and retirement		699			563			136			24.2	%
Consulting and other professional fees		716			364			352			96.7	%
Telecommunications		829			517			312			60.3	%
Supplies		547			350			197			56.3	%
Data processing fees		2,846			2,190			656			30.0	%
Loss (gain) on sales and write-downs of other real estate owned		388			(18	)		406			2255.6	%
Foreclosed asset expenses		725			1,013			(288	)		(28.4	)%
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees		954			924			30			3.3	%
Acquisition related expenses		1,309			627			682			108.8	%
Deposit intangible expenses		692			276			416			150.7	%
Other operating		3,000			1,715			1,285			74.9	%
Total noninterest expenses	$	38,746		$	25,049		$	13,697			54.7	%
Noninterest expenses as a percentage of average assets		3.92	%		3.89	%
Efficiency ratio		83.21	%		79.79	%

The increase in salaries and employee benefits was due to an increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees to 327 at December 31, 2011, compared to 217 at December 31, 2010, primarily related to our FDIC-assisted acquisitions and our mortgage banking expansion. We added approximately 57 employees associated with the two FDIC-assisted acquisitions and added approximately 20 employees associated with our mortgage banking expansion. In 2012, we plan to hire additional staff for our new Valdosta, Georgia office or in connection with any future branch acquisitions, but plan to limit corporate hiring in our finance, operations, and credit areas.

Equipment and occupancy expenses increased primarily due to the two FDIC-assisted acquisitions occurring in 2011.

Consulting and other professional fees increased in 2011, because we hired outside advisors to assist us in evaluating expansion and acquisition opportunities and in integrating our recently acquired branches.

The increase in telecommunications expenses and supplies is related to our acquisition and expansion activity, and we expect this trend to continue in 2012.

The increase in data processing fees reflects our expanded operations and the increased use of debit and ATM cards; however, this cost was more than offset by the income we received on these transactions. We expect this trend to continue in 2012.

The increase in loss on sale of OREO was driven by our increased resolution activity related to our FDIC-assisted portfolio. As we continue to dispose of property in this portfolio, we may record further losses or gains.

Foreclosed asset and collection expenses decreased primarily due to the FDIC sharing in the costs for the FDIC-assisted portfolios we acquired in 2011. We expect foreclosed asset and collection expenses on our other assets to remain elevated in 2012 due to our increased levels of FDIC-assisted problem loans and foreclosed assets.

Other operating expenses increased primarily due to the amortization of core deposit intangibles associated with our 2011 FDIC-assisted acquisition activity. In addition, we recorded acquisition expenses of approximately $1.3 million in 2011 related to the cost associated with our acquisitions and conversion of the operating systems in these branches to our existing operating system.

Income Tax Expense. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded an income tax expense of $1.1 million, compared to a tax benefit of $307,000 during 2010. See Item 8 – Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

General. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded net income of $1.4 million or $0.17 basic and diluted earnings per share compared to a net loss of $1.7 million or $(0.20) basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2009. This $3.1 million improvement in operating results reflects an increase in net interest income, a decrease in loan loss provision expense and an increase in noninterest income, which were partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

Interest Income. Total interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010, increased $5.0 million or 21.4% to $28.4 million, compared to $23.4 million during 2009. The increase was due to a $128.7 million, or 29.5%, increase in average interest-earning assets during 2010 to $565.5 million, compared to $436.8 million during 2009. This increase in average interest-earning assets was due primarily to the branch and FDIC-assisted acquisitions during the fourth quarter of 2009 and first half of 2010, as well as the opening of a new office in Valdosta in the third quarter of 2010. This increase in the average balance of earning assets was offset by a 38 basis point decrease in yield on average-earning assets to 5.12% during 2010 as compared to 5.50% in 2009, as a result of the effects of the rate cuts by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System since 2007. In addition, our overall yield on average interest-earning assets decreased in 2010, because we carried excess liquidity on our balance sheet, primarily from our branch and FDIC-assisted acquisitions and the net proceeds of the conversion stock offering, which have not yet been fully deployed. We expect the yield on our interest-earning assets to continue as rates remain low and excess liquidity is maintained.

Interest income on loans for 2010 was $23.8 million compared to $18.6 million for 2009. The $5.2 million increase in interest income on loans was primarily a result of the loans acquired in our branch and FDIC-assisted transactions and our expansion in new markets, which is reflected in an $80.1 million increase in the average loan portfolio balance in addition to a 7 basis point increase in the weighted average yield on loans to 6.28% for 2010 compared to 6.21% in 2009.

Interest income on investment securities for 2010 was $4.4 million compared to $4.8 million in 2009. Our average taxable investment securities increased by $33.4 million to $118.2 million offset by a decrease in tax exempt securities of $5.7 million in 2010 as a result of the investment of increased liquid assets in our acquisitions and the stock offering. Tax exempt securities average yield increased by 8 basis points from 2009; however, the average yield on taxable investment securities decreased by 131 basis points to 2.96 %.

Interest income on federal funds sold and bank deposits for 2010 was $174,000 compared to $68,000 in 2009. Our average federal funds sold and bank deposits increased by $20.5 million to $43.5 million a result of the investment of increased liquid assets from our acquisitions and the stock offering. However, the average yield on federal funds sold increased by 1 basis point while the average yield on bank deposits decreased by 22 basis points for 2010.

Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased $500,000 or 5.7% to $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $8.8 million during 2009. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 63 basis points to 1.57% during 2010 compared with 2.20% during 2009, as a result of the continued downward trends in the rate cycle. This decrease in costs was offset partially by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities during 2010 to $526.8 million, an increase of $126.0 million compared to $400.8 million during 2009, which reflects increases in deposits from our acquisitions and market expansion and an increase in FHLB advances during 2010. We expect these decreases in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities will slow during 2011 as we near the end of the current rate cycle and because changes in Federal law authorize interest to be paid on business accounts in July 2011.

Interest expense on deposits for 2010 was $5.8 million compared to $6.5 million for 2009. The $700,000 decrease in interest expense on deposits was due to decreased rates on the entire deposit portfolio, primarily the certificate of deposit and money market portfolios, due to the portfolios repricing to lower market rates. The average rate paid on the deposit portfolio decreased 78 basis points from 2.06% for 2009 to 1.28% for 2010. This decrease in the rate paid on deposits was partially offset by a $136.3 million increase in the average balance of the interest-bearing deposits portfolio, primarily as a result of our acquisitions and market expansion.

Interest expense on other borrowings, consisting of FHLB advances, federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase, for 2010 was $2.5 million compared to $2.3 million for 2009. This reflects an $10.3 million decrease in average other borrowings to $77.1 million for 2010 and an increased yield paid on these borrowings, from an average rate paid of 2.66% for 2009 compared to 3.26% for 2010.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for 2010 increased $5.6 million or 38.3% to $20.2 million from $14.6 million for 2009, primarily due to the decrease in interest expense even with a significant increase in interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest spread increased 24 basis to 3.55% for 2010 compared with 3.31% during 2009. The net interest margin increased 17 basis points for 2010 to 3.66% compared with 3.49% for 2009. Also see Item 7 - Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid and – Rate/Volume Analysis.

Provision for Loan Losses. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded a $5.5 million provision for loan losses, which is a decrease compared to the $7.5 million provision recorded during 2009. The primary difference in provision expense was due to a large chargeoff that took place in the fourth quarter of 2009. We expect provision expense to remain elevated until economic conditions improve.

Our loan portfolio has included purchased loans since December 2009, which are recorded in our assets at a discount from the contractual principal value. See Item 8 - Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These purchased loans are included in delinquent loans in the amount of their contractual principal balances when they are 30 to 89 days past due and are considered nonaccrual and are included in nonperforming loans in the amount of their contractual principal balances when they reach 90 days past due or greater. As of December 31, 2010, $1.9 million in purchased loans were included in our nonperforming loans.

Our internally criticized and classified assets totaled $37.8 million at December 31, 2010, compared to $35.8 million at December 31, 2009. These balances include nonperforming loans, other real estate, and repossessed assets. Our internal loan review processes strive to identify weaknesses in loans prior to performance issues. However, our processes do not always provide sufficient time to work out plans with borrowers that would avoid foreclosure and/or losses.

Noninterest Income. A summary of noninterest income, excluding securities transactions and bargain purchase gain, follows:

	Year Ended December 30,
	2010			2009			$ Chg			% Chg
	(Dollars in thousands)

Service charges on deposit accounts	$	4,113		$	3,547		$	566			16.0	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees		2,064			1,406			658			46.9	%
Brokerage fees		1,070			914			156			17.1	%
Mortgage banking fees		606			345			261			75.7	%
Bank-owned life insurance		610			621			(11	)		(1.8	)%
Life insurance proceeds		916			-			916			100.	%
Other		88			45			43			95.5	%
Total noninterest income	$	9,467		$	6,878		$	2,589			37.6	%
Noninterest income as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		1.5	%		1.4	%

The increase in service charges on deposit accounts, other service charges, commissions and fees is due primarily to the increase in new deposits accounts and new market activity from our acquisitions. Recent regulatory changes to the offering of overdraft privileges on ATM and debit cards may cause significant decreases in our overdraft fees in future periods. At this time, we are unable to estimate accurately the effect this and other potential legislation may have on our overdraft income. We are currently analyzing our options to replace this income stream if it is significantly affected by legislation or by a significant change in consumer behavior. These options most likely will result in a major change in the fees we charge to our deposit customers. We otherwise expect to see this trend continue.

The increase in brokerage fees during the year was due to an increase in assets under management during the year, due primarily to the increases seen in the equity markets. These fees are expected to increase in 2011 with our expanded brokerage business in the Statesboro markets.

Mortgage banking fees increased due to the expansion of our mortgage services to the Statesboro Market. During 2011, we expect to add more mortgage originators in other markets and expect mortgage banking fees to increase.

During 2010, we recorded $916,000 of life insurance proceeds on a former officer. We expect this to be a one time event.

Noninterest Expense. A summary of noninterest expense follows:

	Year Ended
	December 31,
	2010			2009			$ Chg			% Chg
	(Dollars in thousands)

Salaries and employee benefits	$	12,676		$	8,899		$	3,777			42.4	%
Equipment		1,131			985			146			14.8	%
Occupancy		1,511			1,198			313			26.1	%
Advertising and marketing		593			439			154			35.1	%
Legal and accounting		616			493			123			24.9	%
Directors fees and retirement		563			553			10			2.0	%
Consulting and other professional fees		364			297			67			22.6	%
Telecommunications		517			239			278			116.3	%
Supplies		351			177			174			98.3	%
Data processing fees		2,190			1,606			584			36.4	%
(Gain) loss on sales and write-downs of other real estate owned		(17	)		422			(439	)		104.0	%
Foreclosed asset expenses		1,013			257			756			294.2	%
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees		924			872			52			5.8	%
Impairment loss of premise for sale		-			502			(502	)		N/A
Impairment loss on intangible asset		1,000			-			1,000			N/A
Other operating		2,617			1,332			1,285			96.5	%
Total noninterest expenses	$	26,049		$	18,271		$	7,778			42.6	%
Noninterest expenses as a percentage of average assets		4.0	%		3.7	%
Efficiency ratio		79.8	%		81.6	%

The increase in salaries and employee benefits was due to an increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees to 217 at December 31, 2010, compared to 134 at December 31, 2009, primarily related to our de novo and acquired branches. We added approximately 45 employees associated with our May 2010 acquisition and increased our full-time equivalent employees by five at our new branch office in Valdosta, Georgia. In 2011, we may hire additional staff for our new Lee County office and in our finance, operations and credit areas to assist with the integration and operation of our recently acquired branches.

Equipment and occupancy expenses increased primarily due to the May 2010 acquisition and our other expansion activities.

Advertising and marketing expenses increased with our expansion into new market areas.

The increase in legal and accounting fees was due primarily to increased legal fees related to problem assets. We expect these legal fees to increase during 2011 due to the level of our foreclosed assets and problem loans. Accounting fees remained level for 2010; however, we expect accounting fees to increase in 2011 due to our increased asset size.

Consulting and other professional fees increased in 2010, because we hired outside advisors to assist us in evaluating expansion and acquisition opportunities and in integrating our recently acquired branches.

The increase in telecommunications expenses and supplies is related to our acquisition and expansion activity, and we expect this trend to continue in 2011.

During 2010, we recorded a gain on the sale of other real estate owned. This gain related to the disposition of several properties we acquired in our FDIC-assisted acquisition. As we continue to dispose of property in this portfolio, we may record further gains. However, these gains may or may not be sufficient to offset other losses and write-downs we incur that are related to other real estate owned.

Foreclosed asset and collection expenses increased primarily due to the increase in foreclosed assets as a result of our FDIC-assisted transaction. We expect foreclosed asset and collection expenses on our other assets to remain high in 2011 due to our increased levels of problem loans and foreclosed assets.

FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees increased during 2010. This increase is due primarily to increased deposit assessment rates charged by the FDIC as well as a significant increase in deposits. This trend will continue for the foreseeable future as the FDIC insurance continues to experience large losses on bank closures and assessment rates remain high. In addition, our FDIC insurance will increase due to increased deposits associated with our expansion efforts and may increase due to the new assessment system in place that charges premiums on non-deposit liabilities.

During 2009, we had a $502,000 impairment on an asset that had been held for sale, and, in 2010, we had a $1.0 million pre-tax charge in the third quarter to write-off an intangible asset from our initial entry into Florida due to a change in federal law. Both of these were one time non-interest expense items that we do not anticipate having in 2011.

Other operating expenses increased primarily due to the amortization of core deposit intangibles associated with our acquisition activity in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the second quarter of 2010. In addition, we recorded conversion expenses of approximately $627,000 in 2010 related to cost associated with our acquisitions and conversion of the operating systems in these branches to our existing operating system.

Income Tax Expense. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded an income tax benefit of $307,000, compared to a tax benefit of $1.7 million during 2009. Our nontaxable income exceeded total net income and thus a tax benefit was recorded for both periods.

Liquidity

We are required to have enough cash and investments that qualify as liquid assets in order to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure a safe and sound operation. Liquidity may increase or decrease depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments in relation to the return on loans. Historically, we have maintained liquid assets above levels believed to be adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. Cash flow projections are regularly reviewed and updated to assure that adequate liquidity is maintained.

Liquidity management involves the matching of cash flow requirements of customers, who may be either depositors desiring to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs and the ability of the Company to manage those requirements. The Company strives to maintain an adequate liquidity position by managing the balances and maturities of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities so that the balance in short-term investments at any given time will adequately cover any reasonably anticipated immediate need for funds. Our liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents, is a product of our operating, investing and financing activities. Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments, such as overnight deposits and federal funds. On a longer term basis, we maintain a strategy of investing in various lending products and investment securities, including mortgage-backed securities.

If additional liquidity were needed, the Bank would turn to short-term borrowings as an alternative immediate funding source and would consider other appropriate actions such as promotions to increase core deposits or the sale of a portion of our unpledged investment portfolio. In addition, we could draw on additional alternative immediate funding sources from lines of credit extended to us from our correspondent banks and/or the FHLB. At December 31, 2011, the Bank had total federal funds credit lines with four correspondent banks of $42 million, with no outstanding advances. The Bank also maintains a credit facility with the FHLB of $107.8 million with total outstanding advances of $35.0 million at December 31, 2011.

On February 18, 2011 we acquired Citizens Bank of Effingham (“Citizens”) in an FDIC-assisted deal which provided approximately $57.9 million in cash and cash equivalents. Deposits in the amount of $206.3 million were also assumed. Of this amount, $23.0 million were non-interest bearing demand deposits and certificates of deposit and interest bearing accounts comprised the remaining $183.3 million. In accordance with our loss-share agreement with the FDIC, we substantially lowered the rate paid on $50.2 million of national or out-of-market deposit accounts that had no identifiable relationship with the Bank. As anticipated, approximately all of these deposits have left the Bank.

On August 19, 2011 we acquired First Southern National Bank (“First Southern”) in an FDIC-assisted deal which provided approximately $9.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. Deposits in the amount of $137.2 million were also assumed. Of this amount, $17.2 million were non-interest bearing demand deposits and certificates of deposit and interest bearing accounts comprised the remaining $120.0 million. In accordance with our loss-share agreement with the FDIC, we substantially lowered the rate paid on $19.3 million of national or out-of-market deposit accounts that had no identifiable relationship with the Bank. As anticipated, approximately all of these deposits have left the Bank.

The FDIC-assisted acquisitions of Citizens and First Southern had a significant impact on our liquidity position, initially increasing our excess liquidity. These excess liquidity balances were managed downward through the anticipated run-off of higher costing national or out-of-market deposit accounts and the repayment of an FHLB advance following the Citizens acquisition.

At December 31, 2011, total deposits increased $350.0 million, or 65.5%, to $884.2 million from $534.2 million at December 31, 2010 primarily driven from the Citizens and First Southern acquisitions. Excluding acquired deposits from Citizens and First Southern, non-interest bearing deposits decreased $6.2 million or 13.4%, to $38.6 million at December 31, 2011 as compared to $44.8 million at December 31, 2010 and interest-bearing deposits increased $12.6 million, or 2.6%, to $502.1 million at December 31, 2011 as compared to $489.5 million at December 31, 2010. Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased $2.6 million, or 7.4%, to $35.0 million at December 31, 2011 as compared to $32.4 million at December 31, 2010. Also, FHLB advances decreased $27.5 million, or 44.0%, to $35 million at December 31, 2011 as compared to $62.5 million at December 31, 2010.

The liquidity and capital resources of the Company are monitored continuously by the Company’s Board-authorized Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) and on a periodic basis by state and federal regulatory authorities. As determined under guidelines established by these regulatory authorities, the Company’s and the Bank’s liquidity ratios at December 31, 2011, were considered satisfactory. At that date, the Bank’s short-term investments were adequate to cover any reasonably immediate need for funds. The Company is aware of no events or trends likely to result in a negative material change in liquidity.

The consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 details cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. For the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash provided by operating and investing activities were $2.3 million and $29.3 million, respectively, offset in part by net cash used in financing activities of $25.9 million, resulting in a net increase in cash during 2011 of $5.7 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table presents our longer term, non-deposit related, contractual obligations and commitments to extend credit to our borrowers, in aggregate and by payment due dates. In addition to the commitments below, we had overdraft protection available in the amounts of $11.5 million at December 31, 2011.

	December 31, 2011
	Less than One Year		One through Three Years		Four through Five Years		After Five Years		Total
	(In thousands)
Contractual obligations:
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		-		5,000		20,000		10,000		35,000
Repurchase agreement		1,555		5,000		5,000		20,000		31,555
Other borrowings		3,494		-		-		-		3,494
Operating leases (premises)		440		370		26		732		1,568
Total advances and operating Leases		5,489		10,370		25,026		30,732		71,617

Off-balance sheet loan commitments:
Undisbursed portions of loans closed		-		-		-		-		-
Commitments to originate loans		-		-		-		-		-
Unused lines of credit		58,531		6,849		2,767		14,519		82,666
Total loan commitments		58,531		6,849		2,767		14,519		82,666
Total contractual obligations and loan commitments										154,283

Capital Resources

Heritage and HeritageBank are subject to minimum capital requirements imposed by the GDBF, FDIC and FRB. Based on their capital levels at December 31, 2011, Heritage and HeritageBank exceeded these state and federal requirements. Consistent with our goals to operate a sound and profitable organization, our policy is for HeritageBank to maintain a "well-capitalized" status under the capital categories of the FDIC. Based on capital levels at December 31, 2011, HeritageBank was considered to be well-capitalized.

As reflected below, Heritage and HeritageBank exceeded the minimum capital ratios at December 31, 2011:

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Minimum Required to be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Heritage Consolidated	$	127,854		22.4	%	$	45,570		8.0	%		N/A		-
HeritageBank	$	102,208		18.8	%	$	43,603		8.0	%	$	54,504		10.0	%

Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Heritage Consolidated	$	121,033		21.2	%	$	22,785		4.0	%		N/A		-
HeritageBank	$	95,357		17.5	%	$	21,802		4.0	%	$	32,703		6.0	%

Tier I Capital to Average Total Assets:
Heritage Consolidated	$	121,033		11.2	%	$	43,407		4.0	%		N/A		-
HeritageBank	$	95,357		8.9	%	$	43,017		4.0	%	$	53,722		5.0	%

Impact of Inflation

The effects of price changes and inflation can vary substantially for most financial institutions. While management believes that inflation affects the economic value of total assets, it believes that it is difficult to assess the overall impact. Management believes this to be the case due to the fact that generally neither the timing nor the magnitude of changes in the consumer price index coincides with changes in interest rates or asset values. For example, the price of one or more of the components of the consumer price index may fluctuate considerably, influencing composite consumer price index, without having a corresponding effect on interest rates, asset values, or the cost of those goods and services normally purchased by us. In years of high inflation and high interest rates, intermediate and long-term interest rates tend to increase, adversely impacting the market values of investment securities, mortgage loans and other long-term fixed rate loans. In addition, higher short-term interest rates tend to increase the cost of funds. In other years, the opposite may occur.

Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market rates change over time. Like other financial institutions, our results of operations are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

How We Measure Our Risk of Interest Rate Changes. As part of our attempt to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and comply with applicable regulations, we monitor our interest rate risk. In doing so, we analyze and manage assets and liabilities based on their interest rates and payment streams, timing of maturities, repricing opportunities, and sensitivity to actual or potential changes in market interest rates.

To manage the potential for adverse effects of material and prolonged increases in interest rates on our results of operations, we adopted asset and liability management policies to understand, measure, monitor, and control the risk. These policies are designed to allow us to implement strategies to minimize the effects of interest rate changes to net income and capital position by properly matching the maturities and repricing terms of our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. These policies are implemented by the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which is composed of senior management members. The ALCO establishes guidelines for and monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources, taking into account relative costs and spreads, interest rate sensitivity and liquidity requirements. The objectives are to manage assets and funding sources to produce results that limit negative changes in net income and capital while supporting liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk, and profitability goals. Senior managers oversee the process on a daily basis.

The ALCO meets monthly to review, among other things, economic conditions and interest rate outlook, current and projected needs and capital position, anticipated changes in the volume and mix of assets and liabilities, interest rate risk exposure, liquidity position, and net portfolio present value. The committee also recommends strategy changes, as appropriate, based on their review. The committee is responsible for reviewing and reporting the effects of the policy implementations and strategies to the board of directors on a quarterly basis.

In order to manage our assets and liabilities and achieve the desired liquidity, credit quality, interest rate risk, profitability, and capital targets, we have focused our strategies on:

Limiting the percentage of long-term fixed-rate loans within our portfolio;

Originating a mix of variable-rate and shorter term fixed-rate loans;

Originating prime-based home equity lines of credit;

Managing deposit relationships for stability and a lower cost of funds position; and

Continuing the origination of consumer loans.

The ALCO has oversight over the asset-liability management of Heritage. This committee regularly reviews interest rate risk by forecasting the impact of alternative interest rate environments on net income and the market value of portfolio equity. Market value of portfolio equity is a measurement of the value of the balance sheet at a fixed point in time. It is summarized as the fair value of assets less the fair value of liabilities. The committee reviews computations of the value of capital at current interest rates and alternative interest rates. The variance in the net portfolio value between current interest rate computations and alternative rate computations represents the potential impact on capital if rates were to change.

We are exposed only to U.S. dollar interest rate changes, and, accordingly, we manage exposure by considering the possible changes in the net interest margin. We do not have any trading instruments nor do we classify any portion of the investment portfolio as held for trading. We monitor its sensitivity to changes in interest rates and may use derivative instruments to hedge this risk. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Finally, we do not have exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity price risk.

Interest rates play a major part in the net interest income of a financial institution. The sensitivity to rate changes is known as “interest rate risk.” The repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities can influence the changes in net interest income.

We use simulation analysis to monitor changes in net interest income due to changes in market interest rates. The simulation of rising, declining and flat interest rate scenarios allows management to monitor and adjust interest rate sensitivity to minimize the impact of market interest rate swings. The analysis of the impact on net interest income over a twelve-month period is subjected to a shock in interest rates of 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis point increase or decrease in market rates on net interest income and is monitored on a quarterly basis. We also monitor regulatory required interest rate risk analysis which simulates more dramatic changes to rates.

Our strategy is to mitigate interest risk to the greatest extent possible. Based on our analysis of overall risk to changes in interest rates, we structure investment and funding transactions to reduce this risk. These strategies aim to achieve neutrality to interest rate risk. Although we strive to have our net interest income neutral to changes in rates, due to the inherent nature of our business, we will never be completely neutral to changes in rates. As of December 31, 2011, a drop in interest rates would increase our net interest income, also known as being “liability sensitive,” and an increase in rates would also increase our net interest income, also known as being “asset sensitive.” The asset sensitivity position was driven by an increase in FRB balances having immediate repricing characteristics, and the decision to start booking loans without interest rate floors. Booking loans without floors lowers the interest that we otherwise would collect with floors; however, due to the absence of floors, these loans will reprice when rates rise. We feel the level of interest rate risk is at an acceptable level, and is within our internal policy limits.

The following table sets forth the distribution of the repricing of our earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2011, the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitivity liabilities), the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative sensitivity gap ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which earning assets and liabilities will mature or may reprice in accordance with their contractual terms. However, the table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the repricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is subject to competitive pressures and the needs of our customers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within the same period may in fact reprice at different times within such period and at different rates.

	December 31, 2011
	Maturing or Repricing Within
	Zero to Three Months			Three Months to One Year			One to Five Years			Over Five Years			Total
	(Dollars in thousands)

Earning assets:
Short-term assets		64,854			-			-			-			64,854
Investment securities		20,333			47,425			121,850			69,409			259,017
Loans held for sale		7,471			-			-			-			7,471
Loans		154,243			127,294			302,121			(23,038	)		560,620
		246,901			174,719			423,971			46,371			891,962

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		(151,765	)		-			-			-			(151,765	)
Savings and money market		(344,820	)		-			-			-			(344,820	)
Time deposits		(74,769	)		(141,251	)		(92,218	)		(541	)		(308,779	)
Other borrowings		(35,049	)		-			-			-			(35,049	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		-			-			(25,000	)		(10,000	)		(35,000	)
		(606,403	)		(141,251	)		(117,218	)		(10,541	)		(875,413	)

Interest rate sensitivity gap		(359,502	)		33,468			306,753			35,830			16,549
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap		(359,502	)		(326,034	)		(19,281	)		16,549
Interest rate sensitivity gap ratio		(0.41	)		(1.24	)		(3.62	)		(4.40	)
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio		(0.41	)		(0.56	)		(0.98	)		(1.02	)

The following table shows the results of our projections for net interest income expressed as a percentage change over our net interest income projection for an immediate change or “shock” in market interest rates over a twelve month period. Due to the historically low level of interest rates, we do not believe downward shocks greater than 100 basis points are relevant. In addition, due to the historically low interest rate environment, there is concern that we may see dramatic increases in interest rates when they begin to rise. To address this concern, we increased our upward interest rates shocks to include a shock of 400 basis points.

Market Rate Change		Effect on Net Interest Income
+400		5.8%
+300		2.2%
+200		-0.2%
+100		2.0%
-100		-2.0%

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009	F-6

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009	F-7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009	F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-11

***

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Heritage Financial Group, Inc.

and Subsidiary

Albany, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Heritage Financial Group and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heritage Financial Group and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 15, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting

/s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC

Albany, Georgia
March 15, 2012.

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Heritage Financial Group, Inc.

and Subsidiary

Albany, Georgia

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Heritage Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 of the Company and our report dated March 15, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC

Albany, Georgia
March 15, 2012.

F-2

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	34,521		$	28,803
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		43,101			10,911
Federal funds sold		21,753			2,700
Securities available for sale, at fair value		259,017			238,377
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at cost		4,067			3,703
Other equity securities, at cost		1,010			1,010
Loans held for sale		7,471			225

Loans		453,163			418,997
Covered loans		107,457			-
Less allowance for loan losses		7,494			8,101
Loans, net		553,126			410,896

Other real estate owned		3,362			3,689
Covered other real estate owned		10,047			-
Total other real estate owned		13,409			3,689

FDIC loss-share receivable		83,901			-
Premises and equipment, net		29,532			21,412
Premises held for sale		1,080			1,080
Accrued interest receivable		4,689			2,907
Goodwill and intangible assets		4,848			2,912
Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		15,611			15,024
Other assets		12,716			11,787
	$	1,089,852		$	755,436

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	78,823		$	44,769
Interest-bearing		805,364			489,474
Total deposits		884,187			534,243
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		35,049			32,421
Other borrowings		35,000			62,500
Accrued interest payable		972			702
Other liabilities		10,508			6,230
Total liabilities		965,716			636,096

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, par value; $0.01; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued, respectively		-			-
Common stock, par value $0.01; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 8,712,031 and 8,710,511 shares issued, respectively		87			87
Capital surplus		88,393			88,876
Retained earnings		42,374			39,536
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $1,384 and $2,609		(2,076	)		(3,914	)
Unearned employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) shares, 439,138 and 492,320 shares		(4,642	)		(5,245	)
Total stockholders' equity		124,136			119,340

	$	1,089,852		$	755,436

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	33,428		$	23,800		$	18,555
Interest and fees on loans held for sale		297			10			-
Interest on taxable securities		4,536			3,495			3,604
Interest on nontaxable securities		880			960			1,174
Interest on federal funds sold		60			45			54
Interest on deposits in other banks		248			129			14
		39,449			28,439			23,401
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		7,550			5,759			6,471
Interest on other borrowings		2,800			2,515			2,322
		10,350			8,274			8,793

Net interest income		29,099			20,165			14,608
Provision for loan losses		2,895			5,500			7,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		26,204			14,665			7,108

Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts		4,777			4,113			3,547
Other service charges, commissions and fees		3,034			2,064			1,406
Brokerage fees		1,386			1,070			914
Mortgage banking income		2,285			606			344
Bank owned life insurance		588			610			621
Gain on bank owned life insurance		32			916			-
Impairment loss on securities available for sale		(43	)		-			-
Gain on sales of securities		684			294			909
Bargain purchase gain		4,217			2,722			-
Accretion of FDIC loss share receivable		381			-			-
Other income		126			88			46
		17,467			12,484			7,787
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		20,393			12,676			8,899
Equipment		1,996			1,131			985
Occupancy		2,279			1,512			1,198
Data processing fees		2,846			2,190			1,605
Directors fees and retirement		699			563			553
Consulting and other professional fees		716			364			297
Advertising and marketing		785			593			439
Legal and accounting		588			616			493
Telecommunications		829			517			239
Supplies		547			350			177
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees		954			924			872
(Gain) loss on sales and write-downs of other real estate owned		388			(18	)		422
Foreclosed asset and collection expenses		725			1,013			258
Impairment loss on intangible asset		-			1,000			-
Impairment loss on premises held for sale		-			-			502
Acquisition related expenses		1,309			627			-
Deposit intangible expenses		692			276			-
Other operating		3,000			1,715			1,332
		38,746			26,049			18,271

F-4

(Continued)

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2009

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	4,925	$	1,099		$	(3,376	)

Applicable income tax expense (benefits)		1,100		(307	)		(1,724	)

Net income (loss)	$	3,825	$	1,406		$	(1,652	)
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic income (loss) per share	$	0.47	$	0.17		$	(0.20	)

Diluted income (loss) per share	$	0.47	$	0.17		$	(0.20	)

Weighted average-common shares outstanding
Basic		8,188,843		8,424,394			8,421,500
Diluted		8,190,062		8,432,282			8,421,500

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009

Net income (loss)	$	3,825		$	1,406		$	(1,652	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Accretion of realized gain on terminated cash flow hedge, net of tax of $99, $141 and $141		(149	)		(211	)		(211	)
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net of tax (benefit) of $2,474, $695, ($672)		3,710			(1,043	)		1,008
Reclassification adjustment for gains and securities impairment included in net income (loss), net of tax $273, $118, and $364		(410	)		(176	)		(546	)
Adjustment to recognize funded status of pension plan, net of tax (benefit) of $875, $65, and ($31)		(1,313	)		(97	)		47

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		1,838			(1,527	)		298

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	5,663		$	(121	)	$	(1,354	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)

																			Other
	Common Stock						Capital			Retained			Unearned ESOP			Treasury			Compre- hensive Income
	Shares		Par Value				Surplus			Earnings			Shares			Stock			(Loss)			Total

Balance, December 31, 2008	11,452,344		$	115		$	39,861		$	41,357		$	(2,865	)	$	(13,570	)	$	(2,685	)	$	62,213
Net loss	-			-			-			(1,652	)		-			-			-			(1,652	)
Cash dividend declared, $0.32 per share	-			-			-			(721	)		-			-			-			(721	)
Stock-based compensation expense	-			-			808			-			-			-			-			808
Repurchase of 62,026 shares of stock for the treasury	-			-			-			-			-			(516	)		-			(516	)
Issuance of 440 shares of common stock from the treasury	-			-			(3	)		-			-			6			-			3
Issuance of restricted shares of common stock	2,000			-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Other comprehensive income	-			-			-			-			-			-			298			298
Tax benefit shortfall from stock-based compensation plans	-			-			(58	)		-			-			-			-			(58	)
ESOP shares earned, 44,070 shares	-			-			(74	)		-			441			-			-			367
Tax benefit on ESOP expense	-			-			76			-			-			-			-			76
Balance, December 31, 2009	11,454,344		$	115		$	40,610		$	38,984		$	(2,424	)	$	(14,080	)	$	(2,387	)	$	60,818
Net income	-			-			-			1,406			-			-			-			1,406
Cash dividend declared, $0.36 per share	-			-			-			(854	)		-			-			-			(854	)
Stock-based compensation expense	-			-			810			-			-			-			-			810
Repurchase of 1,578 shares of stock for the treasury	-			-			-			-			-			(19	)		-			(19	)
Issuance of 1,075 shares of common stock from the treasury	-			-			(4	)		-			-			14			-			10
Items relating to conversion and stock offering:
Merger of Heritage MHC	(7,868,875	)		(79	)		102			-			-			-			-			23
Treasury stock retired	(1,055,587	)		(11	)		(14,074	)		-			-			14,085			-			-
Common stock exchanged for cash in lieu of issuing fractional shares	(411,127	)		(4	)		4			-			-			-			-			-
Proceeds from stock offering, net offering expenses ($4,459)	6,591,756			66			61,393			-			-			-			-			61,459
Purchase of ESOP shares (327,677)	-			-			-			-			(3,277	)		-			-			(3,277	)
Other comprehensive loss	-			-			-			-			-			-			(1,527	)		(1,527	)
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation plans	-			-			(14	)		-			-			-			-			(14	)
ESOP shares earned, 38,403 shares	-			-			3			-			456			-			-			459
Tax benefit on ESOP expense	-			-			46			-			-			-			-			46
Balance, December 31, 2010	8,710,511		$	87		$	88,876		$	39,536		$	(5,245	)	$	-		$	(3,914	)	$	119,340

F-7

(Continued)

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)

	Common Stock						Capital			Retained			Unearned ESOP			Accumulated Other Compre- hensive
	Shares			Par Value			Surplus			Earnings			Shares			Loss			Total
Balance, December 31, 2010		8,710,511		$	87		$	88,876		$	39,536		$	(5,245	)	$	(3,914	)	$	119,340
Net income		-			-			-			3,825			-			-			3,825
Cash dividend declared, $0.12 per share		-			-			-			(987	)		-			-			(987	)
Issuance of 121,530 shares of restricted common stock		121,530			1			(1	)		-			-			-			-
Forfeiture of 3,068 of restricted common stock		(3,068	)		-			-			-			-			-			-
Repurchase of 116,942 shares of common stock		(116,942	)		(1	)		(1,309	)		-			-			-			(1,310	)
Stock-based compensation expense		-			-			728			-			-						728
Other comprehensive income		-			-			-			-			-			1,838			1,838
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation plans		-			-			(8	)		-			-			-			(8	)
ESOP shares earned, 53,182 shares		-			-			17			-			603			-			620
Tax benefit on ESOP expense		-			-			90			-			-			-			90
Balance, December 31, 2011		8,712,031		$	87		$	88,393		$	42,374		$	(4,642	)	$	(2,076	)	$	124,136

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-8

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	3,825		$	1,406		$	(1,652	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,522			946			912
Amortization of deposit intangibles		692			276			-
Impairment loss on intangible assets		-			1,000			-
Impairment loss on premises held for sale		-			-			502
Provision for loan losses		2,895			5,500			7,500
ESOP compensation expense		620			459			367
Provision for deferred taxes		(883	)		(653	)		(699	)
Stock-based compensation expense		728			810			808
Accretion of gain on termination of cash flow hedge		(248	)		(352	)		(352	)
Impairment on securities available for sale		43			-			-
Gain on sales of securities available for sale, net		(684	)		(294	)		(909	)
(Gain) loss on sales and write-downs of other real estate owned		388			(18	)		422
Net gain on sales or disposal of premises and equipment		(4	)		(4	)		(12	)
Increase in bank owned life insurance		(587	)		(267	)		(621	)
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation plans		8			14			58
Excess tax expense related to ESOP		(90	)		(46	)		(76	)
Increase in FDIC loss share receivable		3,494			-			-
Accretion of FDIC loss share receivable		(381	)		-			-
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable		(1,782	)		116			(44	)
Increase (decrease) in interest payable		270			(43	)		(501	)
(Increase) decrease in taxes receivable		613			1,608			(879	)
Increase in loans held for sale		(7,246	)		(225	)		-
(Increase) decrease in prepaid FDIC assessment		840			837			(2,020	)
Gain on bank owned life insurance		(32	)		(916	)		-
Bargain purchase gain		(4,217	)		(2,722	)		-
Net other operating activities		2,547			(2,010	)		(367	)
Total adjustments		(1,494	)		4,016			4,089
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,331			5,422			2,437

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(Increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits in banks		(32,190	)		32,325			(42,491	)
Purchases of securities available for sale		(135,484	)		(256,281	)		(97,885	)
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		100,718			100,128			31,400
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		55,935			36,566			64,815
Increase (decrease) in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,202			(450	)		(68	)
(Increase) decrease in federal funds sold		(19,053	)		8,640			18,914
Increase in loans, net		(8,876	)		(39,858	)		(3,549	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(9,562	)		(3,334	)		(692	)
Net cash received from acquisition activity		67,704			40,553			61,447
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment		19			17			13
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		8,851			2,628			1,220
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		29,264			(79,066	)		33,124

(Continued)

F-9

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in deposits	$	6,456		$	10,573		$	(9,635	)
Increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		2,628			(422	)		(8,654	)
Proceeds from other borrowings		-			20,000			-
Repayment of other borrowings		(32,744	)		-			(11,294	)
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation plans		(8	)		(14	)		(58	)
Excess tax related to ESOP		90			46			76
Purchase of shares, net		(1,310	)		(8	)		(513	)
Net proceeds from common stock offering and reorganization		-			61,482			-
Purchase of common shares for ESOP		-			(3,277	)		-
Dividends paid to stockholders		(987	)		(854	)		(721	)

Net cash provided by (used in)financing activities		(25,877	)		87,526			(30,799	)

Net increase in cash and due from banks		5,718			13,882			4,762

Cash and due from banks at beginning of year		28,803			14,921			10,160

Cash and due from banks at end of year	$	34,521		$	28,803		$	14,921

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid (received) during the year for:
Interest	$	10,080		$	8,278		$	9,132
Income taxes paid (received)	$	-		$	(807	)	$	65

NONCASH TRANSACTIONS
Increase (decrease) in unrealized losses on securities available for sale	$	(5,488	)	$	1,299		$	(771	)
Principal balances of loans transferred to other real estate owned	$	4,557		$	4,560		$	716
Pension liability increase (decrease)	$	1,313		$	97		$	(78	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-10

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

Heritage Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”), a Maryland corporation, was incorporated in May 2010 and organized by Heritage MHC (the “MHC”), Heritage Financial Group and Heritage Bank of the South ( the “Bank”) to facilitate the second-step conversion of the Company from the mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure (the “Conversion”). Upon consummation of the conversion, which occurred on November 30, 2010, the Company became the holding company for the Bank and a 100% publicly owned stock holding company. As a result of the conversion, each share of Heritage Financial Group’s common stock owned by public shareholders was exchanged for 0.8377 shares of the Company’s common stock, with cash being paid in lieu of issuing fractional shares.

Through the Bank, the Company operates a full service banking business and offers a broad range of retail and commercial banking services to its customers located primarily in central and southern Georgia and north central Florida. The Company and the Bank are subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and are periodically examined by those regulatory agencies.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of foreclosed real estate, deferred tax assets, other-than-temporary impairments of securities, and the fair value of financial instruments.

Acquisition Accounting

Generally accepted accounting principles require the use of fair value accounting in determining the carrying values of certain assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and accordingly the Company recorded assets purchased and liabilities assumed in our FDIC-assisted acquisitions at their fair values. The fair value of the loan portfolios acquired in these transactions was recorded and is being accounted for under the principles prescribed by ASC 310.

Subsequent increases in cash flows result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and adjusted the accretable discount, which will have a positive effect on interest income. Because the Company records loans acquired in connection with FDIC-assisted acquisitions at fair value, the Company records no allowance for loan losses related to the acquired covered loans on the acquisition date, given that the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk.

F-11

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Acquisition Accounting (Continued)

Acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Purchased assets and assumed liabilities are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the purchase date. Any identifiable intangible assets are also recorded at fair value. When the fair value of the assets purchased exceed the fair value of liabilities assumed, a "bargain purchase gain" results. If the consideration given exceeds the fair value of the net assets received, goodwill is recognized. Fair values are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of an acquisition as information relative to closing date fair values becomes available.

FDIC Receivable for Loss-Share Agreements

A significant portion of the Company’s acquired loan and other real estate assets are covered under loss share agreements with the FDIC in which the FDIC has agreed to reimburse the Company 80% of all losses as well as certain expenses incurred in connection with those assets. The Company estimated the amount that it will receive from the FDIC under the loss share agreements that will result from losses incurred as the Company disposes of covered loans and other real estate assets, and the Company recorded the estimate as a receivable from the FDIC. The Company discounted the receivable for the expected timing and receipt of those cash flows using a risk free rate plus a premium for risk. The accretion of the FDIC receivable discount is recorded into noninterest income using the level yield method over the estimated life of the receivable.

The loss share agreements also include a provision whereby if losses do not exceed a calculated threshold, the Company is obligated to compensate the FDIC. This is referred to as a clawback liability and, if applicable, is paid at the end of ten years. The formula for the clawback liability varies from transaction-to-transaction and will be calculated using the formula provided in the individual loss share agreements and will not be consolidated into one calculation. The FDIC receivable for loss-share agreements is measured separately from the related covered assets because it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable if the Company sells the assets. The Company will review and update the fair value of the FDIC receivable at each reporting date in conjunction with the re-estimation of cash flows. The FDIC receivable will fluctuate as loss estimates and expected cash flows related to covered loans and other real estate owned change.

Cash Due from Banks and Cash Flows

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and due from banks includes cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, and amounts due from banks. Cash flows from loans, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits, interest receivable, deposits, federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, and interest payable in banks are reported net.

The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The total of those reserve balance requirements was approximately $8.7 million and $9.7 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Securities

Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and recorded at amortized cost. Management has not classified any of its debt securities as held to maturity. Securities not classified as held to maturity, including equity securities with readily determinable fair values, are classified as available for sale and recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of the related deferred tax effect. Equity securities, including other equity securities, without a readily determinable fair value are classified as available for sale and recorded at cost. Restricted equity securities are recorded at cost.

F-12

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Securities (Continued)

The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the life of the securities. Realized gains and losses, determined on the basis of the cost of specific securities sold, are included in earnings on the settlement date.

The Company evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment using relevant accounting guidance specifying that (a) if a company does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and (b) it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other-than-temporarily impaired unless there is a credit loss. When the Company does not intend to sell the security, and it is more likely than not, the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it will recognize the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income.

Securities purchased under resale agreements and securities sold under repurchase agreements are generally accounted for as collateralized financial transactions as more fully disclosed in Note 12. They are recorded at the amount at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued interest. It is the Company’s policy to take possession of securities purchased under resale agreements, which are primarily U.S. Government and Government agency securities. The market value of these securities is monitored, and additional securities are obtained when deemed appropriate to ensure such transactions are adequately collateralized. The Company also monitors its exposure with respect to securities sold under repurchase agreements, and a request for the return of excess securities held by the counterparty is made when deemed appropriate.

Originated Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding principal balances less unearned income, net deferred fees and costs on originated loans and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the outstanding principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs of consumer loans not secured by real estate, are recognized at the time the loan is placed on the books. Loan origination fees and costs for all other loans are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield over the life of the loan using the level yield method without anticipating prepayments.

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when, in management's opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due, unless the loan is well-secured. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. All interest accrued, but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off, is reversed against interest income, unless management believes that the accrued interest is recoverable through the liquidation of collateral. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received until the loans are returned to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and the loan has been performing to contractual terms for a period of not less than 6 months.

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable, based on current information and events, the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Impaired loans are measured by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Interest on accruing impaired loans is recognized as long as such loans do not meet the criteria for nonaccrual status.

F-13

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market, as determined by outstanding commitments from investors. Most mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold with servicing rights released. Gains and losses on sales of mortgage loans are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold and are recorded as a mortgage banking income. Sales in the secondary market are recognized when full acceptance and funding has been received.

Purchased Loans

Loans acquired in business acquisitions are recorded at the fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date.

In determining the acquisition date fair value of purchased loans, and in subsequent accounting, the Company generally aggregates purchased loans into pools of loans with common risk characteristics. Expected cash flows at the acquisition date in excess of the fair value of loans are recorded as interest income over the life of the loans using a level yield method if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company establishes provisions for loan losses, which are charged to operations, at a level Management believes will reflect probable credit losses based on historical loss trends and an evaluation of specific credits in the loan portfolio.

In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, Management considers the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, and past due status and trends.

Management analyzes the non-FDIC acquired loan portfolios through the use of pools of homogenous loan types and through a specific quarterly review of larger problem loans. It is expected that a certain percentage of loans will move through the asset quality grades from pass, to classified, and ultimately loss. See Item 8 - Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on asset quality grade. Management evaluates the non FDIC loan portfolio through review of four loan pool categories.

Pass credits with risk ratings 1-4

Other assets especially mentioned with risk rating 5

Substandard with risk rating 6 and still accruing

Impaired Loans – Nonaccrual and trouble debt restructures

The allowance consists of two components:

A general amount – Management analyzes the historical migration of loans through each risk rating category and analyze the history of losses as it relates to the various loan types and collateral types in order to evaluate and estimate the volume and magnitude of the expected loss. These risk factors and other factors are applied to our review of the loan Pass credits with risk ratings 1-4 pool and other assets especially mentioned with risk rating 5 pool. These factors are applied to the substandard pool; however, in addition to reviewing the pool, a select group of individual loans are reviewed individually. The results of the individual reviews are factored in with the historical loss analysis and applied to the pool.

A specific amount – Impaired loans, in addition to the general amount and review described above, are reviewed individually for specific amounts that are representative of identified credit exposures that are readily predictable by the current performance of the borrower and underlying collateral;

F-14

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Even though the ALLL is composed of two components, the entire ALLL is available to absorb any credit losses.

The Company assesses the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and makes provisions for loan losses as necessary in order to maintain the proper level of allowance. While the Company uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future loan loss provisions may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additional provisions based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that represents management's best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio, and such losses were both probable and reasonably estimable. The level of the allowance is based on estimates and the ultimate losses may vary from the estimates.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives:

		Years
Buildings		40
Furniture and equipment		3-7

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles acquired in connection with business acquisitions. The core deposit intangibles are initially recognized based on a valuation performed as of the consummation date. The core deposit intangibles are amortized over the average remaining life of the acquired customer deposits, or approximately 7 years. Intangible assets were evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2011, and based on that evaluation there was no impairment.

Goodwill

Goodwill recorded represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in acquisitions. Goodwill acquired in a business acquisition is determined to have an indefinite useful life and is not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually.

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if events occur, or if circumstances change, that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below its carrying amount. The annual impairment test is based on discounted cash flow models that incorporate variables including growth in net income, discount rates, and terminal values. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized as a non-cash charge. Goodwill was evaluated for impairment during the fourth quarter of 2011, and based on that evaluation there was no impairment.

Foreclosed Assets

Foreclosed assets acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Any write-down to fair value at the time of transfer to foreclosed assets is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Costs of improvements are capitalized, whereas costs relating to holding foreclosed assets and subsequent adjustments to the value are expensed.

F-15

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company - put presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.

Pension Plan

The compensation cost of an employee’s pension benefit is recognized on the projected unit credit method over the employee’s approximate service period. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute annually an amount that satisfies the funding standard account requirements of ERISA.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")

The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet allocated to participants, is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Compensation expense is based on the market price of shares as they are committed to be released to participant accounts. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares reduce retained earnings; dividends on unearned ESOP shares reduce debt and accrued interest.

The Company accounts for its ESOP in accordance with ASC 718-40. Accordingly, since the Company sponsors the ESOP with an employer loan, neither the ESOP’s loan payable or the Company’s loan receivable are reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Likewise, the Company does not recognize interest income or interest cost on the loan. Unallocated shares held by the ESOP are recorded as unearned ESOP shares in the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. As shares are released for allocation, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market price of the shares for the period.

Income Taxes

The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur. The Company and Bank file consolidated income tax returns but maintain a tax allocation agreement, whereby the Company and Bank calculate their respective amounts of income and expenses and are only responsible for their share of the consolidated income taxes as if they were to file on an unconsolidated basis.

Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more-likely-than-not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more-likely-than-not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment. Deferred tax assets may be reduced by deferred tax liabilities and a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

F-16

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share represent net income (loss) available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unearned shares of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan and unvested shares of stock. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding and dilutive potential common shares. Potential common shares consist only of stock options and unvested restricted shares.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income (loss). Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income (loss), are components of comprehensive income (loss).

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements presented in the year ended December 31, 2010 have been reclassed to conform to the December 31, 2011 presentation.

Recent Accounting Standards

The following are summaries of recently issued accounting pronouncements that impact the accounting and reporting practices of the Company:

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The update provides additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a TDR, both for purposes of recording impairment and disclosing TDRs. A restructuring of a credit arrangement constitutes a TDR if the restructuring constitutes a concession, and the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The clarifications for classification apply to all restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011. The measurement of impairment for those newly identified TDRs will be applied prospectively beginning in the third quarter of 2011. The related disclosures which were previously deferred will be required for the interim reporting period ending September 30, 2011. The impact of adoption for the Company is the inclusion of additional disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (“ASU No. 2011-04”). ASU No. 201104 primarily represents clarification to existing guidance over the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. It does change the concepts of the valuation premise and highest and best use, stating that they are only relevant for nonfinancial assets. The guidance also changes the application of premiums and discounts and includes new disclosures. ASU No. 2011- 04 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on its financial position, results of operation and disclosures, but does not believe adoption will have a material impact.

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU No. 2011-05”). ASU No. 2011-05 requires entities to present net income and other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive statements of net income and other comprehensive income. The option to present items of other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity is eliminated.

F-17

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Recent Accounting Standards (Continued)

The guidance is effective for the Company for the first quarter of 2012, and will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. It will not result in a change of disclosure, as the Company currently presents other comprehensive income in the separate statement following the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-8, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, regarding testing goodwill for impairment (“ASU No. 2011-05”). The new guidance provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that this is the case, it is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit (if any). Based on the qualitative assessment, if an entity determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is more than its carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. The new guidance will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012.

NOTE 2. ACQUISITION ACTIVITY

Citizens Bank of Effingham

On February 18, 2011 (the “Closing Date”), HeritageBank of the South entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement by and among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver of Citizens Bank of Effingham (“Citizens”), Springfield, Georgia, the Bank and the FDIC acting in its corporate capacity, pursuant to which the Bank acquired a majority of all assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Citizens (the “Acquisition”). In connection with the Acquisition, the Bank also acquired other real estate owned (“OREO”) as of the Closing Date.

Pursuant to that agreement, the Bank agreed to pay a premium on deposits totaling $1.4 million and to acquire the specified assets, net of liabilities, at a discount to book value of $25.1 million. The Bank also received a cash payment from the FDIC in the amount of $24.0 million.

The Bank and the FDIC also entered into loss-sharing agreements that provide the Bank with significant protection against credit losses on Citizens’ loans and related assets acquired in the Acquisition. Under these agreements, discussed in more detail below, the FDIC will, for a specified number of years, reimburse the Bank for 80% of all losses and related expenses on covered assets, primarily acquired loans and OREO.

F-18

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2. ACQUISITION ACTIVITY (Continued)

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in conjunction with the Acquisition as of the Closing Date are detailed in the following table (dollars in thousands):

	February 18, 2011		Average Maturity (Years)		Effective Yield / Cost
Assets Acquired:
Cash and due from banks	$	33,900
Securities available for sale		13,386		4.20		1.49	%
Loans		72,720		1.34		4.53	%
Other real estate owned		7,540
Estimated reimbursement from the FDIC		58,164
Core deposit intangible		1,895
Other assets		2,245
Total assets acquired		189,850
Cash paid to settle the acquisition		24,000
Fair value of assets acquired		213,850
Liabilities assumed:
Deposits		206,276		1.26		1.58	%
Other liabilities		6,174
Fair value of liabilities assumed		212,450

Net Assets Acquired / Gained from Acquisition	$	1,400

The following table summarizes the assets covered by the loss-sharing agreements, under the Single Family “SF” and Non-Single Family “Non-SF” certificates, and the amount covered by the FDIC and the estimated fair values (dollars in thousands):

	Amounts Covered		Fair Value		SF Certificate (10 Years for Losses)		Non-SF Certificate (5 Years for Losses)

Loans	$	131,256	$	66,671	$	22,744	$	108,512
OREO		21,663		7,540		-		21,663
Total	$	152,919	$	74,211	$	22,744	$	130,175

The Company elected to account for loans acquired in the Citizens acquisition under ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Topic 310-30 applies to a loan with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. Topic 310-30 prohibits carrying over or creating an allowance for loan losses upon initial recognition for loans that fall under its scope

F-19

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2. ACQUISITION ACTIVITY (Continued)

The following table presents information regarding the loan portfolio acquired on February 18, 2011 at fair value (dollars in thousands):

	Loans With Deterioration of Credit Quality		Loans Without A Deterioration of Credit Quality		Total Loans, at Fair Value

Construction and land	$	5,641	$	7,454	$	13,095
Farmland		1,272		2,362		3,634
Consumer real estate		3,804		14,936		18,740
Commercial real estate		4,635		15,551		20,186
Commercial and industrial		1,787		11,643		13,430
Consumer		31		3,604		3,635
	$	17,170	$	55,550	$	72,720

The following table presents purchased loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30 as of the Closing Date:

February 18, 2011
(dollars in thousands)

Contractually-required principal and interest	$	172,568
Non-accretable difference		(63,694	)
Cash flows expected to be collected		108,874
Accretable yield		(36,154	)
Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC 310-30	$	72,720

The Company did not immediately acquire the real estate, banking facilities, furniture or equipment of Citizens as part of the purchase and assumption agreement. However, the Company subsequently purchased the real estate, banking facilities, furniture or equipment of Citizens from the FDIC at fair value in the amount of $3.2 million during the second quarter of 2011.

F-20

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2. ACQUISITION ACTIVITY (Continued)

First Southern National Bank

On August 19, 2011 (the “Closing Date”), HeritageBank of the South entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement by and among the FDIC as receiver of First Southern National Bank (“First Southern”), Statesboro, Georgia, the Bank and the FDIC acting in its corporate capacity, pursuant to which the Bank acquired a majority of all assets and assumed a majority of all liabilities of First Southern (the “First Southern Acquisition”). In connection with the First Southern Acquisition, the Bank also acquired other real estate owned (“OREO”) as of the Closing Date.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Bank agreed to pay a premium on deposits totaling $1.2 million and to acquire the specified assets, net of liabilities, at a discount to book value of $16.3 million. The Bank also received a cash payment from the FDIC in the amount of $3.4 million.

The Bank and the FDIC also have entered into loss-sharing agreements that provide the Bank with significant protection against credit losses on First Southern’s loans and related assets acquired in the First Southern Acquisition. Under these agreements, discussed in more detail below, the FDIC will, for a specified number of years, reimburse the Bank for 80% of all losses and related expenses on covered assets, primarily acquired loans and OREO.

The fair values of the Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in conjunction with the First Southern Acquisition as of the Closing Date are detailed in the following table (dollars in thousands):

	August 19, 2011			Average maturity (years)		Effective Yield / Cost
Assets Acquired:
Cash and due from banks	$	6,264
Securities available for sale		22,295			9.32		3.29	%
Loans		68,084			6.25		5.38	%
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets		4,669
Estimated reimbursement from the FDIC		30,464
Core deposit intangible		850
Other assets		3,694
Total assets acquired		136,320	��
Cash paid to settle the acquisition		3,540
Fair value of assets acquired		139,860
Liabilities assumed:
Deposits		137,212			0.70		1.08	%
Other liabilities		1,448
Fair value of liabilities assumed		138,660
Net Assets Acquired / Gained from Acquisition	$	1,200

	Amounts Covered		Fair Value		SF Certificate (10 Years for Losses)		Non-SF Certificate (5 Years for Losses)

Loans	$	99,197	$	68,084	$	20,651	$	78,546
OREO		8,645		4,669		7,080		1,565
Total	$	107,842	$	72,753	$	27,731	$	80,111

F-21

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2. ACQUISITION ACTIVITY (Continued)

The Company elected to account for loans acquired in the First Southern Acquisition under ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Topic 310-30 applies to a loan with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. Topic 310-30 prohibits carrying over or creating an allowance for loan losses upon initial recognition for loans that fall under its scope

The following table presents information regarding the loan portfolio acquired on August 19, 2011 at fair value (dollars in thousands):

	Loans with deterioration of credit quality		Loans without deterioration of credit quality		Total loans, at fair value
Construction and land	$	4,888	$	3,604	$	8,492
Farmland		-		4,709		4,709
Consumer real estate		2,058		26,302		28,360
Commercial real estate		2,517		9,814		12,331
Commercial and industrial		76		8,897		8,973
Consumer		44		5,175		5,219
	$	9,583	$	58,501	$	68,084

The following table presents purchased loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30 as of the Closing Date:

August 19, 2011
(dollars in thousands)

Contractually-required principal and interest	$	127,042
Non-accretable difference		(36,994	)
Cash flows expected to be collected	$	90,048
Accretable yield		(21,964	)
Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC 310-30	$	68,084

The Company did not immediately acquire the real estate, banking facilities, or furniture of First Southern but did purchase some of the equipment as part of the purchase and assumption agreement.

The Company recognizes that the determination of the initial fair value of loans at the acquisition date involves a high degree of judgment and complexity. The carrying value of the acquired loans reflect management’s best estimate of the fair value of these assets as of the acquisition date. However, the amount the Company ultimately recognizes on these assets could differ materially from the value reflected in these financial statements, based upon the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. To the extent the actual values recognized for the acquired loans are less than the Company’s estimate, additional losses will be incurred. These fair value estimates are considered preliminary, and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available.

F-22

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2. ACQUISITION ACTIVITY (Continued)

Five Branches of The Park Avenue Bank

On May 24, 2010, the Company completed an acquisition of five branches of The Park Avenue Bank (“PAB”), two in Statesboro and one each in Baxley, Hazlehurst and Adel, Georgia.

The table below represents the refinements to the Company’s initial fair value adjustments allowed by ASC 820, recorded subsequent to the date of acquisition, as of December 31, 2010:

(dollars in thousands)	As Recorded by Heritage Financial Group			Adjusted Fair Value				As Recorded by Heritage Financial Group
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	40,562	$	-			$	40,562
Premises and equipment			3,448		-				3,448
Loans			51,792		(749	)	(a)		51,043
Core deposit intangibles			1,130		781		(b)		1,911
Other assets			245		(63	)			182
Total Assets		$	97,177	$	( 31	)		$	97,146

Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits		$	15,564	$	-			$	15,564
Interest-bearing deposits			81,557		(31	)	(c)		81,526
Other liabilities			56		-				56
Total Liabilities			97,177	$	(31	)		$	97,146

The Company does not expect to make any future adjustments.

Explanations

(a)	The adjustment represents a refinement to the fair market value of the loans assumed in the transaction.

(b)	The adjustment represents a refinement to the value of the core deposit intangible assumed in the acquisition. The core deposit intangible was recorded as an identifiable intangible asset and will be amortized over the average life of the related deposit portfolio, estimated to be seven years.

(c)	The adjustment represents a refinement to fair value of the CD's acquired and will be amortized to reduce interest expense over the average life of the portfolio.

The Company did not acquire any loans with deteriorated credit quality as of the acquisition date in the PAB branch transaction. Accordingly, the Company accounts for the loans acquired in this transaction under FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations.

F-23

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3. SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale with gross unrealized gains and losses are summarized as follows:

		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2011:		(dollars in thousands)
U. S. Government sponsored agencies (GSEs)	$	45,141	$	598	$	(2	)	$	45,737
State and municipal securities		47,167		1,494		(457	)		48,204
Corporate debt securities		2,160		-		(204	)		1,956
GSE residential mortgage-backed securities		161,954		1,461		(452	)		162,963
Total debt securities		256,422		3,553		(1,115	)		258,860
Equity securities		207		66		(116	)		157
Total securities	$	256,629	$	3,619	$	(1,231	)	$	259,017

December 31, 2010:
U. S. Government sponsored agencies (GSEs) and U. S. Treasury securities	$	89,680	$	246	$	(894	)	$	89,032
State and municipal securities		20,642		65		(1,547	)		19,160
Corporate debt securities		2,170		-		(470	)		1,700
GSE residential mortgage-backed securities		125,750		723		(1,137	)		125,336
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		2,800		7		-			2,807
Total debt securities		241,042		1,041		(4,048	)		238,035
Equity securities		435		31		(124	)		342
Total securities	$	241,477	$	1,072	$	(4,172	)	$	238,377

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available for sale as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 by contractual maturity are shown below. Maturities may differ from contractual maturities in mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be called or repaid without penalty. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary.

	December 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
One year or less	$	1,007	$	890	$	24,999	$	24,998
One to five years		5,361		5,322		13,577		13,113
Five to ten years		11,501		11,812		26,926		26,729
Over ten years		76,599		77,873		46,990		45,052
Mortgage-backed securities		161,954		162,963		128,550		128,143
	$	256,422	$	258,860	$	241,042	$	238,035

Securities with a carrying value of approximately $96.3 million and $68.8 million December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

F-24

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3. SECURITIES (Continued)

The gross realized gains and losses recognized in income during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are reflected in the following table:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2009
	(dollars in thousands)

Gross gains	$	684	$	324		$	965
Gross losses		-		(30	)		(56	)
Net realized gains	$	684	$	294		$	909

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities aggregated by category and length of time that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2011 :
U.S. Government sponsored agencies (GSEs)	$	2,498	$	(2	)	$	-	$	-		$	2,498	$	(2	)
State and municipal securities		2,976		(64	)		2,047		(393	)		5,023		(457	)
Corporate debt securities		920		(80	)		1,036		(124	)		1,956		(204	)
GSE residential mortgage-backed securities		58,883		(452	)		-		-			58,883		(452	)
Subtotal, debt securities		65,277		(598	)		3,083		(517	)		68,360		(1,115	)
Equity securities		-		-			91		(116	)		91		(116	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	65,277	$	(598	)	$	3,174	$	(633	)	$	68,451	$	(1,231	)

December 31, 2010:
U.S. Government sponsored agencies (GSEs) and U.S. Treasury securities	$	68,948	$	(894	)	$	-	$	-		$	68,948	$	(894	)
State and municipal securities		13,815		(638	)		3,541		(909	)		17,356		(1,547	)
Corporate debt securities		934		(80	)		766		(390	)		1,700		(470	)
GSE residential mortgage-backed securities		72,748		(1,137	)		-		-			72,748		(1,137	)
Subtotal, debt securities		156,445		(2,749	)		4,307		(1,299	)		160,752		(4,048	)
Equity securities		-		-			311		(124	)		311		(124	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	156,445	$	(2,749	)	$	4,618	$	(1,423	)	$	161,063	$	(4,172	)

F-25

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3. SECURITIES (Continued)

At December 31, 2011, debt securities with unrealized losses improved to $1.2 million, or 1.8% of the securities, compared to $4.2 million, or 2.6% of the securities, at December 31, 2010. The unrealized losses in 2011 relate principally to some state and municipal obligations, government sponsored entities ("GSE") debentures and mortgage-backed securities.. In analyzing an issuer's financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, the results of reviews of the issuer's financial condition, and the issuer's anticipated ability to pay the contractual cash flows of the investments.

The Company does not currently intend to sell the securities within the portfolio and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the debt securities; therefore, management does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2011. Management continues to monitor all of these securities with a high degree of scrutiny. There can be no assurance that the Company will not conclude in future periods that conditions existing at that time indicate some or all of these securities may be sold or are other than temporarily impaired, which would require a charge to earnings in such periods. At December 31, 2011, the Company held certain investment securities having continuous unrealized loss positions for more than 12 months. All of these losses were in one corporate security, one single issue trust preferred, and nine municipal securities. The unrealized loss arose from changes in interest rates and market conditions with the exception of the single issue trust preferred security which was deemed impaired as of December 31, 2011.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

The Company reviews its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis judging each investment for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). Management does not have the intent to sell any of the temporarily impaired investments and believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell any such securities before a recovery of cost. The OTTI analysis focuses on the duration and amount a security is below book value and assesses a calculation for both a credit loss and a non credit loss for each measured security considering the security’s type, performance, underlying collateral, and any current or potential debt rating changes. The OTTI calculation for credit loss is reflected in the income statement while the non credit loss is reflected in other comprehensive income (loss).

The Company holds Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”) preferred stock, and OTTI was recorded in the amount of the investment after the U.S. Government placed the company into conservatorship in September 2008. The preferred stock has been reduced to a nominal book value for tracking purposes. The investment is currently valued at $66,000. During the twelve months ended December 30, 2008 the Company recognized a write-down of $1.5 million through non-interest income representing other-than-temporary impairment on the investment.

The Company holds a single issue trust preferred security issued by Royal Bank of Scotland (“RBS”). The security suspended payments under the EU agreement for 24 months beginning April 1, 2011. The Company valued the security by projecting estimated cash flows using the Moody’s Ba2 marginal default rate. The difference in the present value and the carrying value of the security was the OTTI credit portion. The security is currently booked at a fair value of $91,000 at December 31, 2011 and during the twelve months ended December 30, 2011 the Company recognized a write-down of $43,000 through non-interest income representing other-than-temporary impairment on the security.

F-26

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3. SECURITIES (Continued)

The following table presents more detail on selective Company security holdings as of year-end 2011. These details are listed separately due to the inherent level of risk for OTTI on these securities.

Description	Cusip#	Current Credit Rating	Book Value		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Present Value Discounted Cash Flow

Marketable equity securities
FHLMC Preferred Stock	313400657	Ca	$	-	$	66	$	-		$	66


Trust preferred securities
RBS Capital Fund	74928K208	B3		207		91		(116	)		207

The following table presents a roll-forward of the cumulative amount of credit losses on the Company’s investment securities that have been recognized through earnings as of December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009.

	December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		December 31, 2009
Beginning balance of credit losses	$	1,500	$	1,500	$	1,500
Other-than-temporary impairment credit losses		43		-		-

Ending balance of cumulative credit losses recognized in earnings	$	1,543	$	1,500	$	1,500

Restricted Equity Securities

The investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta is accounted for by the cost method, which also represents par value, and is made for long-term business affiliation reasons. In addition, this investment is subject to restrictions relating to sale, transfer or other disposition. Dividends are recognized in income when declared. The carrying value of this investment at December 31, 2011 and 2010 is $4.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of this investment is $4.1 million as of December 31, 2011, and therefore is not considered impaired.

Other equity securities represent an investment in the common stock of the Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia (“Chattahoochee”), a de novo bank in Gainesville, Georgia. The Company accounts for this investment by the cost method. This investment represents approximately 4.9% of the outstanding shares of Chattahoochee. Since its initial capital raise, Chattahoochee has not had any stock transactions, and therefore, no fair market value is readily available. The carrying value of this investment at December 31, 2011 is $1.0 million. The Company plans to hold this investment for the foreseeable future, and did not consider it impaired as of December 31, 2011.

F-27

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The composition of loans is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Commercial real estate:
Nonresidential	$	138,970		$	110,079
Multifamily		15,797			13,598
Farmland		17,921			12,339
Total commercial real estate loans		172,688			136,016

Construction and land		26,804			24,522

Consumer real estate:
Mortgage loans, 1-4 families		129,745			131,293
Home equity		26,154			26,091
Total consumer real estate loans		155,899			157,384

Consumer and other:
Indirect auto loans		3,741			8,646
Direct auto loans		6,430			8,446
Other		13,701			10,023
Total consumer loans		23,872			27,115

Commercial and industrial loans		55,179			52,589

		434,442			397,626
Loans acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions
Non-Covered		18,721			21,371
Covered		107,457			-
Total loans		560,620			418,997

Total allowance for loan losses		(7,494	)		(8,101	)
Loans, net	$	553,126		$	410,896

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial real estate lending includes real estate loans secured primarily by multifamily dwellings, retail establishments, hotels, motels, warehouses, small office buildings, farmland, and other properties located in our market areas.

F-28

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Construction and Land

Construction and land lending consist of loans for the construction of one- to four-family residences, multifamily residences and commercial properties Construction loans also involve additional risks because funds are advanced upon the security of the project under construction, which is of uncertain value prior to the completion of construction. Moreover, because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, delays arising from labor problems, material shortages, and other unpredictable contingencies, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project, and the related loan-to-value ratios.

Consumer Real Estate

Consumer real estate lending consist of loans secured by first mortgages on one- to four-family residences, including home equity lines of credit, in our lending area, and on occasion, outside our lending area for customers whose primary residences are within the Company’s lending area.

Consumer and Other Lending

Consumer and other lending includes a variety of secured consumer loans, new and used auto loans, boat and recreational vehicle loans, and loans secured by deposit accounts. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do single family residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles and recreational vehicles. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. As a result, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability and, thus, are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy.

Commercial and Industrial Lending

Commercial and industrial lending activities encompass loans with a variety of purposes and security, including loans to finance accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Commercial business loans are generally secured by business assets, such as accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. This collateral may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Nonetheless, these loans are believed to carry higher credit risk than traditional single family loans.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009

Balance, beginning of period	$	8,101		$	6,060		$	4,950
Provision for loan losses		2,895			5,500			7,500
Loans charged off		(4,362	)		(3,686	)		(6,621	)
Credit mark transfer in		197			-			-
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		663			227			231
Balance, end of period	$	7,494		$	8,101		$	6,060

F-29

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Activity in the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans by segment:

	Commercial Real Estate			Consumer Real Estate			Construction and Land			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer and Other			Total
	(dollars in thousands)

Balance, January 1, 2011	$	1,721		$	2,197		$	1,977		$	1,601		$	605		$	8,101
Add (deduct):
Charge-offs		(573	)		(3,177	)		(18	)		(330	)		(264	)		(4,362	)
Recoveries		495			18			2			-			148			663
Credit mark transfer in		197			-			-			-			-			197
Provision		38			3,402			(691	)		280			(134	)		2,895
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	1,878			2,440			1,270			1,551			355			7,494

Allowance:
Ending balance: specific	$	8			352			341			-			-			701
Ending balance: collective	$	1,870			2,088			929			1,551			355			6,793

Loans:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,938			9,035			4,326			1,368			-			16,667
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	170,750			146,864			22,478			53,811			23,872			417,775

	Commercial Real Estate			Consumer Real Estate			Construction and Land			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer and Other			Total
	(dollars in thousands)

Balance, January 1, 2010	$	1,176		$	1,422		$	1,419		$	1,193		$	850		$	6,060
Add (deduct):
Charge-offs		(412	)		(1,278	)		(704	)		(804	)		(488	)		(3,686	)
Recoveries		-			10			-			-			217			227
Provision		957			2,043			1,262			1,212			26			5,500
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	1,721		$	2,197		$	1,977		$	1,601		$	605		$	8,101
Allowance:
Ending balance: specific	$	450			693			73			6						1,222
Ending balance: collective	$	1,271			1,504			1,904			1,595			605			6,879
Loans:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,322		$	6,757		$	4,909		$	932		$	-		$	15,920
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	132,694		$	150,627		$	19,613		$	51,657		$	27,115		$	381,706

F-30

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual term of the loan. Impaired loans include loans modified in troubled debt restructuring where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.

Impaired loans by class are presented below for 2011:

	Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized YTD 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate:
Nonresidential		$	981		993		99		985		34
Multifamily			2		4		1		89		6
Farmland			111		114		-		112		-
Total commercial real estate loans			1,094		1,111		100		1,186		40

Construction and land			3,961		3,961		525		3,984		167

Consumer real estate:
Mortgage loans, 1-4 families			6,759		8,937		710		7,534		130
Home equity			105		138		101		112		4
Total consumer real estate loans			6,864		9,075		811		7,646		134

Consumer and other:
Indirect auto loans			83		98		-		103		4
Direct auto loans			55		67		41		65		2
Other			39		40		38		42		2
Total consumer and other loans			177		205		79		210		8

Commercial and industrial loans			1,179		1,323		389		1,301		20
Total		$	13,275	$	15,675	$	1,904	$	14,327	$	369

F-31

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Impaired loans by class are presented below for 2010:

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized YTD 2010
	(dollars in thousands)

Commercial real estate:
Nonresidential	$	1,770		1,770		280		1,770		30
Multifamily		1,586		1,586		175		1,586		47
Farmland		-		-		-		-		-
Total commercial real estate loans		3,356		3,356		455		3,356		77

Construction and land		4,997		4,997		1,114		4,997		198

Consumer real estate:
Mortgage loans, 1-4 families		6,695		6,695		896		6,695		242
Home equity		223		223		2		223		9
Total consumer real estate loans		6,918		6,918		898		6,918		251

Consumer and other:
Indirect auto loans		108		108		50		108		5
Direct auto loans		48		48		17		48		2
Other		9		9		3		9		1
Total consumer and other loans		165		165		70		165		8

Commercial and industrial loans		1,005		1,005		266		1,005		62
Total	$	16,441	$	16,441	$	2,803	$	16,441	$	596

F-32

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Below is an analysis of the age of recorded investment in loans that are past due as of the year ended December 31, 2011.

	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater Than		Total Past				Total
	Past Due		Past Due		90 Days		Due		Current		Loans
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate:
Nonresidential	$	111	$	-	$	361	$	472	$	138,498	$	138,970
Multifamily		-		-		2		2		15,795		15,797
Farmland		-		-		111		111		17,810		17,921
Total commercial real estate loans		111		-		474		585		172,103		172,688

Construction and land		-				442		442		26,362		26,804

Consumer real estate:
Mortgage loans, 1-4 families		93		-		4,667		4,760		124,985		129,745
Home equity		54		24		105		183		25,971		26,154
Total consumer real estate loans		147		24		4,772		4,943		150,956		155,899

Consumer and other:
Indirect auto loans		23		-		83		106		3,635		3,741
Direct auto loans		-		-		55		55		6,375		6,430
Other		6		-		38		44		13,657		13,701
Total consumer and other loans		29		-		176		205		23,667		23,872

Commercial and industrial loans		60				1,179		1,239		53,940		55,179
Total	$	347	$	24	$	7,043	$	7,414	$	427,028	$	434,442

F-33

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Below is an analysis of the age of recorded investment in loans that are past due as of the year ended December 31, 2010.

	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater Than		Total Past				Total
	Past Due		Past Due		90 Days		Due		Current		Loans
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate:
Nonresidential	$	-	$	-	$	1,770	$	1,770	$	108,309	$	110,079
Multifamily		-		-		1,586		1,586		12,012		13,598
Farmland		-		-		-		-		12,339		12,339
Total commercial real estate loans		-		-		3,356		3,356		132,660		136,016

Construction and land		295		-		1,423		1,718		22,804		24,522

Consumer real estate:
Mortgage loans, 1-4 families		1,167		-		4,650		5,817		125,476		131,293
Home equity		-		38		223		261		25,830		26,091
Total consumer real estate loans		1,167		38		4,873		6,078		151,306		157,384

Consumer and other:
Indirect auto loans		171		10		108		289		8,357		8,646
Direct auto loans		42		5		48		95		8,351		8,446
Other		22		-		9		31		9,992		10,023
Total consumer and other loans		235		15		165		415		26,700		27,115

Commercial and industrial loans		40		89		88		217		52,372		52,589
Total	$	1,737	$	142	$	9,905	$	11,784	$	385,842	$	397,626

There were no accruing loans that were greater than 90 days past due at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

F-34

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) Modifications

Impaired loans include loans modified in troubled debt restructuring where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions are a part of the Company’s loss mitigation activities and could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. Certain TDR’s are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, typically considered six to twelve months.

Included in certain loan categories are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired. At December 31, 2011, the Company had troubled debt restructurings totaling $10.4 million, which involve forgiving a portion of interest or principal on any loans or making loans at a rate materially less than that of market rates. Included in nonaccruing loans at December 31, 2011, are troubled debt restructurings of $4.2 million. In addition, at that date the Company had troubled debt restructurings totaling $6.2 million that were performing in accordance with their modified terms and are not included in nonaccruing loans.

The following tables include the recorded investment and number of modifications for modified loans. The Company reports the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and also the recorded investment in the loans after the loans were restructured. Management has also disclosed the recorded investment and number of modifications for troubled debt restructurings within the last year where a concession has been made that then defaulted in the current reporting period.

Troubled Debt Restructurings for the years ended:

	As of December 31, 2011
	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modifications		Recorded Investment

Commercial real estate		2	$	852	$	843
Consumer real estate		5		7,268		5,206
Construction and land		1		3,574		3,519
Commercial and industrial loans		1		920		839
Consumer and other		-		-		-
Total		9	$	12,614	$	10,407

	As of December 31, 2010
	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modifications		Recorded Investment

Commercial real estate		-	$	-	$	-
Consumer real estate		2		2,065		2,060
Construction and land		2		5,274		4,704
Commercial and industrial loans		1		920		915
Consumer and other		-		-		-
Total		5	$	8,259	$	7,679

F-35

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Troubled Debt Restructuring Modifications that Subsequently Defaulted for the years ended:

	As of December 31, 2011
	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment

Commercial real estate		1	$	223
Consumer real estate		3		3,114
Construction and land		-		-
Commercial and industrial loans		1		839
Consumer and other		-		-
Total		5	$	4,176

	As of December 31, 2010
	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment

Commercial real estate		-	$	-
Consumer real estate		-		-
Construction and land		1		1,130
Commercial and industrial loans		-		-
Consumer and other		-		-
Total		1	$	1,130

Credit Quality

The Bank manages the loan portfolio by assigning one of eight credit risk ratings based on an internal assessment of credit risk. The credit risk categories are Pass 1 Highest Quality, Pass 2 Highest Quality to Satisfactory, Pass 3 Satisfactory, Pass 4 Minimum Acceptable Credit, OAEM Special Mention 5, Substandard 6 Excessive Credit Risk, Doubtful 7 and Loss 8.

Pass-1-Highest Quality - Assets of this grade are the highest quality credits of the Bank. They exceed substantially all the Bank's underwriting criteria, and provide superior protection for the Bank through the paying capacity of the borrower and value of the collateral. The Bank's credit risk is considered to be negligible.

Pass-2-Highest Quality to Satisfactory - Loans that are fully secured by tangible collateral and the borrowers have demonstrated or documented exceptional credit history, net worth or some other measure of repayment ability.

Pass-3-Satisfactory - Loans that are of satisfactory credit quality, are properly structured and documented, and require only normal supervision. Financial data is current and adequate income, profits, cash flow and satisfactory credit history and leverage position of borrower, make financial condition satisfactory. Loan is in proportion to worth. Unsecured loans are normally for specific purposes and short term. Secured loans have good collateral margin. Repayment terms are realistic, clearly defined and based upon the primary source of repayment and all such loans meet banks lending criteria. Seasonal loans, such as crop production or working capital, are seasonally rested. Real estate loans are within proper loan to value ratios and have adequate debt service coverage.

F-36

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Pass-4-Minimum Acceptable Credit - Loans which exhibit all the characteristics of a Satisfactory Credit but warrant more than the normal level of Loan Officer supervision, due to: Circumstances which elevate the risks of performance prospects (i.e., start-up operations, untested management, heavy leverage, interim losses); Adverse, extraordinary, events that have affected, or could affect, the borrower’s cash flow, financial condition, ability to continue operating profitability, or refinancing (i.e., death of principal, fire, divorce).

OAEM-5-Special Mention - Loans With Greater Than Normal Credit Risk - (Other Assets Especially Mentioned) - Credits in this category include loans on which payment is probable, but timeliness of payment is not certain. Assets in this category have potential weaknesses, which, if not corrected, will leave the bank inadequately protected. Such weaknesses threaten the integrity of the asset or will leave the bank’s position vulnerable. Potential weakness may be evidenced by inadequate financial information, deteriorating capacity to service term debt, inability to meet reduction or payout requirements for interim or short term financing, unfavorable industry or company trends and companies with weak or deteriorating management. Individuals with excessive leverage, or with financial information which omits or ignores cash flow or debt service, should also be classified OAEM. Also includes, companies and individuals whose financial information is out of date. Game plans must be developed on all OAEM assets and time frames established to cure the weaknesses in the credit or move the relationship out of the bank.

Substandard-6-Excessive Credit Risk - Loans rated 6 are substandard assets and are classified loans. These loans represent an excessive credit risk for the bank and must be monitored closely for adherence to game plans. Substandard assets are inadequately protected by the tangible net worth and repayment capacity of the borrower. The collateral pledged may be insufficient to cover the bank’s exposure. There are well-defined weaknesses which jeopardize the repayment of the loan on reasonable terms and the borrower may not be able to keep up the interest payments. Adverse trends may result in payment over an excessive period of time and there may be the possibility of loss. Substandard loans may or may not be placed on non-accrual, the unsecured portion of some loans may be written down.

Doubtful-7 - Loans that have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard, with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. This assessment should be made on current facts, conditions and values. The probability of some loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors (i.e., merger/liquidation, capital injection, refinancing plans, and perfection of liens), the amount of loss cannot yet be determined. Determination of the pending factors should generally be resolved within six months and the asset partially, or fully, charged-off or moved to substandard. All doubtful assets will be placed on non-accrual.

Loss-8 - Loans in the loss category are those, which are deemed uncollectible, and as such, are charged to the Loan Loss Reserve. Loans may be charged-off, either in whole or in part. Loans, which carry a 8 rating, are no longer considered assets of the bank. The 8-risk rating may be used to designate the remaining portion of a relationship still on the Bank’s books after the exposure has been charged-off.

F-37

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

Credit quality indicators by class are presented below:

	As of December 31, 2011
	Non- Residential		Multifamily		Farmland		Construction and Land
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial Real Estate Credit Exposure
Pass 1	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Pass 2		-		-		-		76
Pass 3		64,303		5,336		8,014		11,032
Pass 4		67,135		8,568		9,230		11,168
Special Mention 5		5,064		1,753		161		135
Substandard 6		2,468		140		516		4,393
Doubtful 7		-		-		-		-
Loss 8		-		-		-		-
Total	$	138,970	$	15,797	$	17,921	$	26,804

	As of December 31, 2010
	Non- Residential		Multifamily		Farmland		Construction and Land
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial Real Estate Credit Exposure
Pass 1	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	75
Pass 2		-		-		-		-
Pass 3		50,899		5,242		7,239		8,497
Pass 4		54,852		6,586		3,280		9,723
Special Mention 5		1,539		-		1,293		530
Substandard 6		2.789		1,770		527		5,697
Doubtful 7		-		-		-		-
Loss 8		-		-		-		-
Total	$	110,079	$	13,598	$	12,339	$	24,522

F-38

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

	As of December 31, 2011
	Commercial
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial Credit Exposure
Pass 1	$	1,101
Pass 2		299
Pass 3		30,515
Pass 4		20,428
Special Mention 5		986
Substandard 6		1,850
Doubtful 7		-
Loss 8		-
Total	$	55,179

	As of December 31, 2010
	Commercial
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial Credit Exposure
Pass 1	$	1,008
Pass 2		281
Pass 3		29,683
Pass 4		19,015
Special Mention 5		667
Substandard 6		1,935
Doubtful 7		-
Loss 8		-
Total	$	52,589

F-39

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

	As of December 31, 2011
	Mortgage		Home Equity
	(dollars in thousands)
Consumer Real Estate Credit Exposure
Pass 1-4	$	118,125	$	25,684
Special Mention 5		973		262
Substandard 6		10,647		208
Doubtful 7		-		-
Loss 8		-		-
Total	$	129,745	$	26,154

	As of December 31, 2010
	Mortgage		Home Equity
	(dollars in thousands)
Consumer Real Estate Credit Exposure
Pass 1-4	$	120,103	$	25,779
Special Mention 5		2,896		-
Substandard 6		8,294		312
Doubtful 7		-		-
Loss 8		-		-
Total	$	131,293	$	26,091

	As of December 31, 2011
	Indirect Auto		Direct Auto		Other
	(dollars in thousands)
Consumer and Other Credit Exposure
Pass 1-4	$	3,590	$	6,374	$	13,594
Special Mention 5		18		-		20
Substandard 6		133		56		87
Doubtful 7		-		-		-
Loss 8		-		-		-
Total	$	3,741	$	6,430	$	13,701

	As of December 31, 2010
	Indirect Auto		Direct Auto		Other
	(dollars in thousands)
Consumer and Other Credit Exposure
Pass 1-4	$	8,405	$	8,370	$	9,998
Special Mention 5		29		-		-
Substandard 6		212		76		25
Doubtful 7		-		-
Loss 8		-		-
Total	$	8,646	$	8,446	$	10,023

F-40

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted loans to certain directors, executive officers and their affiliates. Changes in related party loans are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)

Balance, beginning of year	$	9,121		$	8,722
Advances		15,951			13,329
Repayments		(15,738	)		(12,702	)
Changes in related parties		(18	)		(228	)
Balance, end of year	$	9,316		$	9,121

FDIC-Assisted Transactions

The Company elected to account for loans acquired in Tattnall Bank, Citizens and First Southern acquisitions under ASC 310–30. Under ASC 310-30 Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, applies to a loan with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. ASC 310 prohibits carrying over or creating an allowance for loan losses upon initial recognition for loans which fall under the scope of this statement. Loans with specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality were accounted for under ASC 310. In addition, the Company determined it would not be able to collect all the contractually required principal and interest payments on other loans in the portfolio which did not have specific evidence of credit quality due to multiple factors, including the deterioration of the economy since origination of these loans, the decline in real estate values in the market areas of the loans, and the poor underwriting standards under which these loans were originated. These loans are accounted for by analogy to ASC 310. The following tables detail the fair value of loans covered and not covered under loss share agreements accounted under ASC 310-30.

Loans not covered by loss -sharing agreements: (dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2011

Commercial real estate	$	7,632
Consumer real estate		2,304
Construction and land		1,512
Commercial and industrial		3,320
Consumer and other		3,953
		18,721

Loans covered by loss-sharing agreements:	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2011


Commercial real estate	$	31,951
Consumer real estate		44,189
Construction and land		19,789
Commercial and industrial		9,515
Consumer and other		2,013
		107,457

The Bank entered into loss-sharing agreements as part of the acquisitions of Citizens and First Southern. The covered loans above are covered pursuant to the FDIC loss-share agreements, which are discussed in Note 2-Acquisition Activity, and are presented net of the related fair value discount.

F-41

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

FDIC-Assisted Transactions (continued)

The following table represents the loans receivable as of December 31, 2011 and reflects reclassifications from the balances reported at December 31, 2010:

	Acquired Loans Without Specific Evidence of Deterioration in Credit Quality			Acquired Loans With Specific Evidence of Deterioration in Credit Quality			Total Loans Acquired
	(dollars in thousands)
Contractually required principal and interest	$	190,798		$	55,948		$	246,746
Non-accretable difference		(56,343	)		(33,129	)		(89,472	)
Cash flows expected to be collected		134,455			22,819			157,274
Accretable yield		(29,146	)		(1,950	)		(31,096	)
Basis in acquired loans	$	105,309		$	20,869		$	126,178

The following table is a summary of changes in the accretable yields of acquired loans since the acquisition date and reflect refinements to the Company's initial estimate:

	Acquired Loans Without Specific Evidence of Deterioration in Credit Quality			Acquired Loans With Specific Evidence of Deterioration in Credit Quality			Total Loans Acquired
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance at acquisition, December 31, 2009	$	1,025		$	2,352		$	3,377
Net Accretion		2,274			(1,053	)		1,221
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	3,299		$	1,299		$	4,598
Additions:
Citizens		35,731			423			36,154
First Southern		20,364			1,600			21,964
Net Accretion		(30,248	)		(1,372	)		(31,620	)
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	29,146		$	1,950		$	31,096

F-42

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5. FDIC LOSS SHARE RECEIVABLE

The following table provides changes in the loss-share receivable from the FDIC for the period ended December 31, 2011.


	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	-
FDIC Loss share receivable recorded for Citizens		58,164
FDIC Loss share receivable recorded for First Southern		30,464
Claimable losses on covered under agreement		(3,140	)
Reimbursable expense claimed		1,208
Accretion of discounts and premiums, net		381
Reimbursements from FDIC		(3,176	)
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	83,901

NOTE 6. ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE

Accrued interest receivable consists of the following for the periods indicated:

	December 31,
	2011		2010


Loans	$	3,047	$	1,970
Other interest earning assets		22		-
GSE and private label residential mortgage-backed securities		666		406
Other investment securities		954		531
Subtotal, securities		1,620		937
	$	4,689	$	2,907

F-43

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 7. OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

The following table provides a summary of information pertaining to OREO for periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

	OREO			Covered OREO			Total
	(dollars in thousands)

Balance, December 31, 2010	$	3,689		$	-		$	3,689
Acquired in Citizens acquisition		-			7,540			7,540
Acquired in First Southern acquisition		-			4,644			4,644
Additions		2,230			1,610			3,840
Sales		(1,699	)		(3,747	)		(5,446	)
Writedowns		(858	)		-			(858	)
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	3,362			10,047			13,409

	OREO			Covered OREO		Total
	(dollars in thousands)

Balance, December 31, 2009	$	1,739		$	-	$	1,739
Additions		4,560			-		4,560
Sales		(2,628	)		-		(2,628	)
Writedowns		18			-		18
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	3,689			-		3,689

The covered OREO above is covered pursuant to the FDIC loss-share agreements which are discussed in Note 2-Acquisition Activity, and is presented net of the related fair value discount.

F-44

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Land and improvements	$	9,895		$	7,270
Buildings		18,131			13,851
Furniture and equipment		13,453			10,525
Construction in progress		573			806
		40,052			32,452
Accumulated depreciation		(12,520	)		(11,040	)
	$	29,532		$	21,412

Premises held for sale	$	1,080		$	1,080

The Company began construction on a new branch in Valdosta, Georgia, scheduled to open in 2012, at an approximate cost of $1.9 million. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.5 million, $946,000 and $912,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

F-45

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)

Leases

In 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into seven short term, 12 to 18 months, leases for new mortgage loan production operations. Additionally, the Company entered into three leases associated with the Valdosta branch and the construction of a permanent branch location.

The Company entered into various operating agreements for office equipment, primarily printers, as a result of the increase in operation locations in 2011 and 2010. The average term of these agreements is 36 months.

The Company has a lease agreement for its investment division operations on a month to month lease.

The Company also has an assignment of a 99 year land lease associated with a branch office in Ocala, Florida with a remaining life of approximately 60 years.

Rental expense under all operating leases amounted to approximately $543,000 $121,000, $121000 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Future minimum lease commitments on noncancelable operating leases, excluding any renewal options, are summarized as follows:

	(dollars in thousands)
2012	$	440
2013		239
2014		132
2015		13
Thereafter		744
	$	1,568

F-46

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

During 2010, the Company recorded goodwill associated with the Lake City branch acquisition. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the goodwill was carried at $553,000. There was no impairment of the goodwill in 2011.

Intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles acquired in connection with business acquisitions.

In February 2011, the Company recorded $1.8 million core deposit intangible with the FDIC-assisted acquisition of Citizens. Additionally, the Company recorded $850,000 core deposit intangible with the FDIC-assisted acquisition of First Southern Bank in August 2011.

Following is a summary of information related to the intangible assets associated with these acquisitions based on the Company's allocations:

	As of December 31, 2011				As of December 31, 2010
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
	(dollars in thousands)
The Tattnall Bank	$	263	$	73	$	263	$	40
Lake City, Florida, branch		460		128		460		69
PAB branches		1,912		429		1,912		167
Citizens Bank of Effingham		1,778		283		-		-
First Southern National Bank		850		55		-		-
Core deposit intangibles	$	5,263	$	968	$	2,635	$	276

The estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years as of December 31, 2011 is as follows:

	(dollars in thousands)
2012	$	763
2013		680
2014		621
2015		570
2016		517
2017 and beyond		1,144
	$	4,295

There was $692,000 and $276,000 of amortization expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

F-47

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10. DEPOSITS

The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $154.7 million and $80.9 million, respectively.

The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2011 are as follows:

2012	$	216,233
2013		50,241
2014		15,460
2015		15,762
2016 and beyond		11,083
	$	308,779

Overdraft deposit accounts reclassified to loans totaled $586,000, $296,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company had $45.2 million and $14.2 million in brokered deposits as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in brokered deposits was the result of a 2006 brokered MMA agreement which capped deposit balances at $35 million. The balances in the brokered MMA account increased from $5.7 million as of December 31, 2010 to $34.8 million as of December 31, 2011.

The depositors of the Bank are insured by the FDIC. This insurance coverage generally insures each depositor up to $250,000. Amounts in excess of $250,000 are generally not insured.

The following table presents the interest expense for each major category of deposits for periods indicated:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
Interest Expense
Interest bearing demand	$	818	$	917	$	534
Savings and money market		2,367		2,030		1,553
Retail time deposits		4,178		2,554		3,787
Wholesale time deposits		187		258		597
	$	7,550	$	5,759	$	6,471

F-48

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Pension Plan

The Company provides pension benefits for eligible employees through a defined benefit pension plan. Effective January 1, 2009, the Board of Directors voted to freeze the plan to new entrants. Participants of the plan prior to January 1, 2009 that meet certain age and service requirements participate in the retirement plan on a noncontributing basis. Information pertaining to the activity in the plan is as follows:

	December 31,
	(dollars in thousands)
	2011			2010			2009
Changes in benefit obligations:
Obligations at beginning of year	$	9,851		$	8,327		$	6,753
Service cost		709			702			609
Interest cost		507			489			419
Benefits paid		(1,076	)		(530	)		(544	)
Actuarial loss		1,785			863			1,090
Obligations at end of year	$	11,776		$	9,851		$	8,327

Changes in plan assets:
Fair value of assets at beginning of year	$	8,184		$	6,233		$	4,592
Actual return on assets		(95	)		861			1,185
Company contributions		1,085			1,620			1,000
Benefits paid		(1,076	)		(530	)		(544	)
Fair value of assets at end of year	$	8,098		$	8,184		$	6,233

Funded status at end of year, included in other liabilities	$	3,678		$	(1,667	)	$	(2,094	)

Pretax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
Net loss	$	5,863		$	3,666		$	3,495
Prior service cost		149			158			167
	$	6,012		$	3,824		$	3,662

Accumulated benefit obligation	$	9,736		$	8,265		$	6,588

Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	709		$	702		$	609
Interest cost		507			489			419
Expected return on plan assets		(636	)		(475	)		(358	)
Amortization of prior losses		319			306			332
Amortization of service costs		9			9			9
Net periodic benefit cost	$	908		$	1,031		$	1,011

F-49

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

Pension Plan (Continued)

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:

	December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(dollars in thousands)
Current year actuarial loss	$	2,516		$	477		$	263
Amortization of prior losses		(319	)		(306	)		(332	)
Amortization of prior service cost		(9	)		(9	)		(9	)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	2,188		$	162		$	(78	)

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Assumptions used in computations:
In computing ending obligations:
Discount rate		4.75	%		5.25	%
Rate of compensation increase		3.00	%		3.00	%
In computing expected return on plan assets		7.50	%		7.50	%

To determine the expected rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets. The approximate allocation of plan assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

	2011			2010

Fixed income		35.6	%		31.3	%
Equities		54.6	%		55.5	%
Cash and cash equivalents		6.1	%		9.7	%
Other		3.7	%		3.5	%

Plan fiduciaries set investment policies and strategies for the plan assets. Long-term strategic investment objectives include capital appreciation through balancing risk and return.

The Company expects to contribute $1.0 million to the plan during 2012.

The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during 2012 are as follows:

Prior service cost	$	9
Net loss		565
	$	574

F-50

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

Pension Plan (Continued)

Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are as follows:

Fiscal Year	Amount
	(dollars in thousands)
2012	$	1,588
2013		446
2014		421
2015		394
2016		689
2017-2021		9,792

401(K) Plan

The Company has also established a salary deferral plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan allows eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation up to 25%, subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. Such deferrals accumulate on a tax deferred basis until the employee withdraws the funds. The Company matches 50% of employee’s contributions up to 4% of their salary. Total expense recorded for the Company’s match was approximately $157,000 and $123,000 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)

In connection with the minority stock offering, the Company established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) for the benefit of its employees with an effective date of June 29, 2005. The ESOP purchased 440,700 (369,174 after conversion) shares of common stock from the minority stock offering with proceeds from a ten-year note in the amount of $4.4 million from the Company. After the 2010 Conversion and stock offering, the unearned shares held by the ESOP were adjusted to reflect the 0.8377:1 exchange ratio on publicly traded shares. Additionally, in connection with the 2010 Conversion the stock offering, the ESOP purchased 327,677 shares of common stock with proceeds from a twenty-year note in the amount of $3.3 million.

The Company’s Board of Directors determines the amount of contribution to the ESOP annually, but it is required to make contributions sufficient to service the ESOP’s debt. Shares are released for allocation to employees as the ESOP debt is repaid. Eligible employees receive an allocation of released shares at the end of the calendar year on a relative compensation basis. An employee becomes eligible on January 1st or July 1st immediately following the date they complete one year of service. Company dividends on allocated shares will be paid to employee accounts. Dividends on unallocated shares held by the ESOP will be applied to the ESOP note payable.

Contributions to the ESOP during 2011 and 2010 amounted to $726,000 and $488,000, respectively.

Compensation expense for shares committed to be released under the Company’s ESOP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $620,000 and $459,000, respectively. Shares held by the ESOP were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
Shares released for allocation		257,713		204,531
Unearned		439,138		492,320
Total ESOP shares		696,851		696,851

Fair value of unearned shares at December 31	$	5,181,828	$	6,114,617

F-51

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 12. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company has entered into separate deferred compensation arrangements with certain executive officers and directors. The plans call for certain amounts payable at retirement, death or disability. The estimated present value of the deferred compensation is being accrued over the remaining expected service period. The Company has purchased life insurance policies which they intend to use to finance this liability. Cash surrender value of life insurance of $15.6 million and $15.0 million December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is separately stated on the consolidated balance sheets. The Bank is generally limited by regulatory guidance to an investment in cash surrender value of Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) of no more than 25% of Tier I capital at the time of purchase. The Bank was in compliance with this regulatory guidance at the time of purchase. In September of 2007, the Company accelerated vesting under its deferred compensation agreements with each of its currently serving covered directors and executives. Under this acceleration, each covered director and executive is fully vested in their plan balance.

Accrued deferred compensation of $3.1million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is included in other liabilities.

The Company has also entered into deferred salary agreements with certain officers electing to defer a portion of their salary. These amounts are expensed and the plan accumulates the deferred salary plus earnings. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the liability for these agreements was $707,000 and $613,000 respectively, and is included in other liabilities.

Aggregate compensation expense under the plans was $42,000, $58,000 and $41,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

F-52

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13.

FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND SECURITIES SOLD UNDERREPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

Federal funds purchased represent unsecured borrowings from other banks and generally mature daily. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are secured borrowings and are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transactions. The Company may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. The Company monitors the fair value of the underlying securities on a daily basis. Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements at were as follows:

	December 31,
	2011		2010

	(dollars in thousands)

Federal funds purchased from Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia with interest at 0.15% maturing daily.	$	1,555	$	12
Sold in overnight agreements maturing in one to four days.		3,494		2,409
Sold in a structured agreement due January 25, 2015 with a rate of 3.78% fixed until maturity.		5,000		5,000
Sold in a structured agreement due March 3, 2013 with a rate of 3.45% fixed until maturity.		5,000		5,000
Sold in a structured agreement due March 3, 2018 with a variable rate, that resets quarterly, of 4.37% at December 31, 2011.		5,000		5,000
Sold in a structured agreement due March 8, 2017 with a fixed rate of 4.85% until maturity.		10,000		10,000
Sold in a structured agreement due August 21, 2017 with a fixed rate of 4.75% until maturity.		5,000		5,000
	$	35,049	$	32,421

The federal funds purchased from Chattahoochee are under similar terms and conditions as would be available with other third parties.

F-53

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 14. OTHER BORROWINGS

Other borrowings consist of the following:

	December 31,
	2011		2010

	(dollars in thousands)
Advance from Federal Home Loan Bank with interest at a fixed rate of 3.71%, due September 17, 2014	$	5,000	$	5,000
Advance from Federal Home Loan Bank with interest at a fixed rate of 4.23%, due August 17, 2015		5,000		5,000
Advance from Federal Home Loan Bank with interest at a variable rate of 2.85%, due February 28, 2011		-		7,500
Advance from Federal Home Loan Bank with interest at a fixed rate of 2.74%, due July 23, 2018		10,000		10,000
Advance from Federal Home Loan Bank with interest at a fixed rate of 4.54%, due October 31, 2016		15,000		15,000
Advance from Federal Home Loan Bank with interest at a fixed rate of 0.47%, due December 22, 2011		-		20,000
	$	35,000	$	62,500

The advances from Federal Home Loan Bank are collateralized by the pledging of a blanket lien on some first mortgage loans and other specified loans. At December 31, 2011, $72.8 million was available for borrowing on lines with FHLB.

The other borrowings December 31, 2011 have maturities in future years as follows:

2012	$	-
2013		-
2014		5,000
2015		5,000
2016		15,000
Later years		10,000
	$	35,000

The Company and the Bank have available unused lines of credit with various financial institutions including the FHLB totaling approximately $114.8 million and $35.6 million December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

F-54

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 15. INCOME TAXES

The income tax expense (benefit) in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009

	(dollars in thousands)
Current	$	1,983		$	346		$	(1,025	)
Deferred		(883	)		(653	)		(699	)
	$	1,100		$	(307	)	$	(1,724	)

The Company's income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amounts computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rates to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences is as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011					2010					2009

	(dollars in thousands)
Tax at federal income tax rate	$	1,674		34.00	%	$	374		34.00	%	$	(1,148	)	34.00	%
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest		(283	)	(5.75	)%		(323	)	(29.38	)%		(385	)	(11.41	)%
Gain on bank owned life insurance death benefit		(11	)	(0.22	)%		(312	)	(28.33	)%		-		-
Bank owned life insurance		(200	)	(4.06	)%		(208	)	(18.88	)%		(211	)	(6.25	)%
Employee Stock
Ownership Plan		(76	)	(1.55	)%		(39	)	(3.59	)%		(64	)	(1.91	)%
Other		(4	)	(0.08	)%		201		18.28	%		84		2.50	%
Provision for income tax expense (benefits)		1,100		22.34	%		(307	)	(27.90	)%		(1,724	)	(51.07	)%
Pre-tax income (loss) for each period	$	4,925				$	1,099				$	(3,376	)

For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded income a tax benefit despite having recorded net income. The sources of nontaxable income, primarily from tax-exempt interest and bank owned life insurance and benefit exceeded the total taxable income for the period, and therefore caused an income tax benefit to be recorded.

F-55

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 15. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The components of deferred taxes are summarized as follows:

	December 31,

	2011		2010

	(dollars in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Loan loss reserves	$	2,800	$	2,427
Deferred compensation		1,522		1,467
Pension liability		2,404		1,529
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale		-		1,233
Impairment loss on securities available for sale		556		556
Stock-based compensation		494		433
Nonaccrual loans		139		204
Premises held for sale		201		201
Other real estate owned		452		493
Core deposit intangible		351		61
Net operating loss carryforward		-		618
State tax credit carryforward		232		318
Other		6		22
		9,157		9,562
Deferred tax liabilities:
Bargain gain purchase		-		1,089
Depreciation and amortization		278		210
Realized gains on terminated cash flow hedges		65		164
Deferred pension costs		337		267
Deferred loans costs		111		105
Goodwill		30		15
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale		955		-
		1,776		1,850

Net deferred tax assets	$	7,381	$	7,712

Management performed an analysis related to the Company’s deferred tax assets for the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. In its analysis, the Company considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether estimated future taxable income will be sufficient to realize these assets. The tax operating losses have been carried back against prior years’ taxable income, resulting in the tax benefits from the losses being fully realized. However, based on current tax laws, there are no more income taxes that may be recovered from prior years. As a result, the realization of the deferred tax assets is solely dependent upon future taxable income. The primary positive evidence considered was sustained taxable income for both 2011 and 2010, internal projections, economic and industry trends, historical and projected loan loss trends, the impact of regulatory reform and demographic data for the Company’s markets. Based upon this analysis, the Company believes that future taxable income will more likely than not be sufficient to realize these assets, and thus, no valuation allowances were deemed necessary for the periods indicated above.

F-56

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 16. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share represent income available attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unallocated shares of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan and unvested shares of issued restricted stock. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, potential common shares of 1,010,416, 577,631, and 577,652, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the assumed exercise of such shares would be anti-dilutive.

The components used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009

	(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Basic earnings (loss) and shares:
Net income (loss)	$	3,825	$	1,406	$	(1,652	)

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		8,188,843		8,424,394		8,421,500

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.47	$	0.17	$	(0.20	)

Diluted earnings (loss) and shares:
Net income (loss)	$	3,825	$	1,406	$	(1,652	)

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		8,188,843		8,424,394		8,421,500
Add: Effect of dilutive outstanding equity-based shares		1,219		7,888		-

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding		8,190,062		8,432,282		8,421,500

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.47	$	0.17	$	(0.20	)

NOTE 17. STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS

On May 17, 2006, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to promote the long-term growth and profitability of Heritage Financial Group, Inc, to provide directors, advisory directors, officers and employees of Heritage Financial Group, Inc. and its affiliates with an incentive to achieve corporate objectives, to attract and retain individuals of outstanding competence, and to provide such individuals with an equity interest in Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Under the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has discretion to award up to 645,990 shares, of which 461,422 were available as stock options or stock appreciation rights and 184,568 shares were available as restricted stock awards. As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 12,634 restricted stock awards and 42,514 options available to be granted from the 2006 Plan.

On June 22, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”). Under the 2011 Plan, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to award up to 573,481 shares, of which 409,429 were available as stock options or stock appreciation rights and 163,852 were available as restricted stock awards. As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 46,322 restricted stock awards and 75,159 options available to be granted from the 2011 Plan.

F-57

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 17. STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS (continued)

The Company granted restricted awards that may not be sold or otherwise transferred until certain restrictions have lapsed. The unearned compensation related to these awards is being amortized to compensation expense over the period the restrictions lapse (generally one to five years). The share-based expense for these awards was determined based on the market price of the Company's stock at the date of grant applied to the total number of shares that were anticipated to fully vest, amortized over the vesting period.

STOCK OPTIONS

A summary of the status of the two plans, along with changes during the periods then ended, follows:

	December 31,
	2011					2010
	(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	Number			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number		Weighted- Average Exercise Price

Under option, beginning of period		416,791		$	14.90		416,791	$	14.90
Granted		346,870			11.95		-		-
Exercised		-					-		-
Forfeited		(7,219	)		14.55		-		-
Expired		(17,882	)		15.44		-		-
Under option, end of period		738,560		$	13.51		416,791	$	14.90

Exercisable at end of period		386,091		$	14.94		323,787	$	14.99

Weighted average fair value per option of options granted during period				$	2,692			$	-

Total grant date fair value of options vested during the period				$	300			$	305

Total intrinsic value of options exercised during the period				$	-			$	-

Shares available for grant					117,673				36,446

F-58

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 17. STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

The following table presents information on stock options outstanding for the period shown, less estimated forfeitures:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010

Stock options vested and expected to vest:
Number		738,560		416,791
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$	13.51	$	14.90
Aggregate Intrinsic Value		-		-
Weighted Average Contractual Term of Options	6.8 years		5.5 years

Stock options vested and currently exercisable:
Number		386,091		323,787
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$	14.94	$	14.99
Aggregate Intrinsic Value		-		-
Weighted Average Contractual Term of Options	4.4 years		5.4 years

A further summary of the options outstanding at December 31, 2011 follows:

		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices		Number		Weighted- Average Contractual Life in Years		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number		Weighted- Average Exercise Price

$	14.97		377,214		4.4	$	14.97		377,214	$	14.97
$	19.85		2,094		4.9	$	19.85		2,094	$	19.85
$	13.43		7,956		6.0	$	13.43		4,773	$	13.43
$	8.32		5,026		7.9	$	8.32		2,010	$	8.32
$	12.35		12,000		9.0	$	12.35		-	$	12.35
$	11.94		334,270		9.5	$	11.94		-	$	11.94
			738,560		6.8	$	13.51		386,091	$	14.94

F-59

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 17. STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. Expected dividends are based on expected dividend trends and the expected market price of the Company’s stock price at grant. Historical data is used to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The Company granted 12,000 options on January 1, 2011 from the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. On July 1, 2011, the Company granted 334,870 options from the new 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2010. The assumptions listed in the table below were used for the options granted in the period indicated.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate		2.55	%		-
Weighted average expected life of the options	7.5 years				-
Weighted average expected dividends (as a percent of the fair value of the stock)		1.64	%		-
Weighted-average expected volatility		80.46	%		-

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 the Company recognized pre-tax compensation expense related to stock options of approximately $392,000, $312,000, and $311,000, respectively. At December 31, 2011, there was approximately $2.4 million of unrecognized compensation related to stock options.

RESTRICTED STOCK

The Company also grants restricted stock periodically for the benefit of employees and directors. The 2006 plan reserved 184,568 shares of common stock for restricted stock grants and, under the 2011 plan, 163,852 shares of common stock are reserved for restricted stock grants.

At December 31, 2011, restricted stock grants covering 173,127 shares of common stock had been issued less 2,868 shares forfeited in 2011 leaving 12,634 shares available for grant from the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Additionally, at December 31, 2011, restricted stock grants covering 117,530 shares of common stock had been issued, 200 had been forfeited and 46,322 shares were available for grant from the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan

F-60

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 17. STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

RESTRICTED STOCK (continued)

Restricted stock grants are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Compensation expense for restricted stock is based on the market price of the Company stock at the time of the grant and amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period which is currently five years for all grants issued. Recipients of restricted stock do not pay any cash consideration to the Company for the shares, have the right to vote all shares subject to such grant and receive all dividends with respect to such shares, whether or not the shares have vested. The restriction is based upon continuous service. The Company awarded 4,000 shares of restricted stock on January 1, 2011 from the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. On July 1, 2011, the Company awarded 117,530 shares of restricted stock from the new 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. There were no restricted stock awards in during the year ended December 31, 2010. Restricted stock consists of the following:

	December 31, 2011					December 31, 2010
	Restricted Shares			Weighted Average Market Price at Grant		Restricted Shares			Weighted Average Market Price at Grant
Balance, beginning of period		37,705		$	14.60		71,213		$	14.74
Granted		121,530			11.95		-			-
Vested		(32,256	)		14.85		(33,508	)		14.90
Forfeited		(3,069	)		14.50		-			-
Balance, end of period		123,910		$	11.94		37,705		$	14.60

The balance of unearned compensation related to these restricted shares as of December 31, 2011 is $1.3 million which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average of 4.45 years. Total compensation expense recognized for the restricted shares granted to employees and directors for the year ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 was approximately $336,000 and $497,000, $497,000, respectively.

F-61

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 18. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In 2007, the Company entered into three, 5-year interest rate swap agreements totaling a $20 million notional amount to hedge against interest rate risk in a declining rate environment. As a cash flow hedge, the portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative that has been deemed highly effective is recognized in other comprehensive income until the related cash flows from the hedged item are recognized in earnings. At December 31, 2007, the Company reported a $234,838 gain, net of a $156,558 tax effect, in other comprehensive income related to cash flow hedges.

In March 2008, the Company terminated these swap agreements for a cash payment from its counterparty in the amount of $898,725. This gain, net of tax, is reported as a component of other comprehensive income, and will be accreted to interest income over the remaining life of the swap agreements. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010 the Company had a balance of $163,000 and $359,000, respectively, of unaccreted gain related to these swap agreements.

In May 2008, the Company entered into two, 3-year interest rate swap agreements totaling a $20 million notional amount to hedge against interest rate risk in a declining rate environment. In November 2008, the Company terminated these swap agreements for a cash payment from its counterpart in the amount of $376,471. This gain, net of tax, is reported as a component of other comprehensive income, and will be accreted to interest income over the remaining life of the swap agreements. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had a balance of $0 and $52,000, respectively; of unaccreted gain related to these swap agreements.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded interest income of $248,000, $352,000 and $352,000, respectively, on the accretion of terminated cash flow hedges. The remaining deferred gain of $163,000 will be accreted into interest income in 2012. At December 31, 2011, the Company had no remaining derivative contracts in place.

NOTE 19. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company’s asset-liability management policy allows the use of certain derivative financial instruments for hedging purposes in managing the Company’s interest rate risk. The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash flows, and therefore its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or referenced interest rate. The most common derivative instruments include interest rate swaps, caps, floors and collars.

Loan Commitments

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. They involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets.

The Company's exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. A summary of the Company's commitments is as follows:

	December 31,
	2011		2010

	(dollars in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	82,165	$	52,151
Standby letters of credit		501		808
	$	82,666	$	52,959

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.

F-62

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 19. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Collateral is required in instances which the Company deems necessary.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the carrying amount of liabilities related to the Company’s obligation to perform under financial standby letters of credit was insignificant. The Company has not been required to perform on any financial standby letters of credit and the Company has not incurred any losses on financial standby letters of credit for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements at December 31, 2011.

NOTE 20. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT

The Company makes commercial, residential, construction, agricultural, agribusiness and consumer loans to customers primarily in counties in south and central Georgia and north central Florida. A substantial portion of the Company's customers' abilities to honor their contracts is dependent on the business economy in the geographical areas served by the Bank.

A substantial portion of the Company's loans are secured by real estate in the Company's primary market areas. In addition, a substantial portion of the other real estate owned is located in those same markets. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Company's loan portfolio and the recovery of a substantial portion of the carrying amount of other real estate owned are susceptible to changes in real estate conditions in the Company's primary market area.

Based on the capital level at December 31, 2011, the maximum amount under Georgia law that the Bank could loan to any one borrower and the borrower's related entities was $20.6 million for fully secured loans and $12.4 million for all other loans. Internally, management has set a limit of $5.0 million. These internal limits may be exceeded by approval of the Board of Directors.

NOTE 21. REGULATORY MATTERS

The Bank is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be declared without prior regulatory approval. At December 31, 2011, there was approximately $2.2 million available for dividend declaration without regulatory approval.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's and Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital, as defined by the regulations, to risk-weighted assets, as defined, and of Tier I capital to average assets, as defined. Management believes, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

F-63

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 21. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the most recent notification from the regulatory authorities categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

The Company and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2011
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Consolidated	$	127,854		22.4	%	$	45,570		8.0	%	$	N/A		-
HeritageBank of the South		102,208		18.8	%		43,603		8.0	%		54,504		10.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Consolidated	$	121,033		21.2	%	$	22,785		4.0	%	$	N/A		-
HeritageBank of the South		95,357		17.5	%		21,802		4.0	%		32,703		6.0	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated	$	121,033		11.2	%	$	43,407		4.0	%	$	N/A		-
HeritageBank of the South		95,357		8.9	%		43,017		4.0	%		53,722		5.0	%

As of December 31, 2010
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Consolidated	$	120,189	26.4	%	$	36,465	8.0	%	$	N/A	-
HeritageBank of the South		88,712	19.9	%		35,739	8.0	%		44,674	10.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Consolidated	$	114,560	25.1	%	$	18,233	4.0	%	$	N/A	-
HeritageBank of the South		83,083	18.6	%		17,870	4.0	%		26,805	6.0	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated	$	114,560	16.1	%	$	28,508	4.0	%	$	N/A	-
HeritageBank of the South		83,083	12.1	%		27,436	4.0	%		34,294	5.0	%

Heritage Financial Group, Inc. is subject to Georgia capital requirements for holding companies.

At December 31, 2011, Heritage Financial Group, Inc. had total equity of $124.1 million or 11.4% of total assets as of that date. Under Georgia capital requirements for holding companies, Heritage Financial Group, Inc. had Tier I leverage capital of $121.0 million or 11.2%, which was $77.6 million above the 4.0% requirement.

F-64

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 21. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)

Under federal law, the Bank is subject to the qualified thrift lender test. The qualified thrift lender test requires a savings institution to have at least 65% of its portfolio assets in housing related to finance and other specified areas. If this test is not met, limits are placed on growth, branching, new investments, FHLB advances and dividends, or the Bank must convert to a commercial bank charter. Management believes that this test is met.

As a Georgia savings bank, the Bank is subject to less restrictive regulations. Under Georgia regulations, the Bank is required to have no more than 50% of its assets in commercial real estate and business loans.

A reconciliation of the Bank's capital included in its balance sheets and the regulatory capital amounts follows:

	December 31,
	2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Total capital per balance sheet	$	99,893		$	86,149
Regulatory capital adjustments:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities		(1,433	)		1,790
Net unrealized loss on available for sale equity securities		-			(31	)
Accumulated net gains on cash flow hedges		3,509			2,048
Disallowed goodwill and other disallowed intangible assets		(4,848	)		(2,912	)
Disallowed deferred tax assets		(1,764	)		(3,961	)

Total Tier 1 Capital		95,357			83,083

Allowance for loan and lease losses includible in Tier 2 capital		6,821			5,615
Unrealized gains on available for sale equity securities includible in Tier 2 capital		30			14

Total Tier 1 and 2 Capital	$	102,208		$	88,712

F-65

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 22. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic (FASB ASC 820), the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

Fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1 - Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Valuation is based on inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The valuation may be based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 - Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

F-66

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 22. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Continued)

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Cash, Due From Banks, Interest-Bearing Deposits in Banks and Federal Funds Sold: The carrying amount of cash, due from banks, interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions and federal funds sold approximates fair value.

Securities: Fair value of securities is based on available quoted market prices. The carrying amount of equity securities with no readily determinable fair value approximates fair value.

Loans Held for Sale: The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates fair value.

Loans: The carrying amount of variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Deposits: The carrying amount of demand deposits, savings deposits and variable-rate certificates of deposit approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using interest rates currently being offered for certificates of similar maturities.

Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements: The fair value of fixed rate federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using the current incremental borrowing rates for similar type borrowing arrangements.

Other Borrowings: The carrying amount of variable rate advances approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed rate advances is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using the current incremental borrowing rates for similar type borrowing arrangements.

Accrued Interest: The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates fair value.

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments: The carrying amount of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit approximates fair value.

F-67

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 22. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Continued)

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis: Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Carrying Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2011
Securities available for sale
Debt securities	$	-	$	258,860	$	-	$	258,860
Marketable equity securities		66		91		-		157
Total securities available for sale	$	66	$	258,951	$	-	$	259,017

December 31, 2010
Securities available for sale
Debt securities	$	-	$	238,035	$	-	$	238,035
Marketable equity securities		31		311		-		342
Total securities available for sale	$	31	$	238,346	$	-	$	238,377

F-68

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 22. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Continued)

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis: Under certain circumstances, adjustments are made to fair value for assets and liabilities although they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis. The following table presents the financial instruments carried on the consolidated balance sheet by caption and by level in the fair value hierarchy for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded:

	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Losses
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2011
Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	11,371	$	4,016
Foreclosed assets		-		-		13,441		858
Total	$	-	$	-	$	24,812	$	4,873


December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	11,829	$	3,498
Foreclosed assets		-		-		2,021		382
Total	$	-	$	-	$	13,850	$	3,880


December 31, 2009
Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	7,237	$	4,275
Foreclosed assets		-		-		530		362
Total	$	-	$	-	$	7,767	$	4,637

In accordance with the provisions of the loan impairment guidance (ASC 310-10-35), individual loans were written down to their fair value. Loans applicable to write downs of impaired loans are estimated using the present value of expected cash flows or the appraised value of the underlying collateral discounted as necessary due to management’s estimates of changes in economic conditions.

Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the foreclosed assets as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

F-69

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 22. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Continued)

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments were as follows:

	December 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value

Financial assets:
Cash, due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in banks	$	77,622	$	77,622	$	39,714	$	39,714
Federal funds sold	$	21,753	$	21,753	$	2,700	$	2,700
Securities available for sale	$	259,017	$	259,017	$	238,377	$	238,377
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	$	4,067	$	4,067	$	3,703	$	3,703
Other equity securities	$	1,010	$	1,010	$	1,010	$	1,010

Loans held for sale	$	7,471	$	7,471	$	225	$	225

Non covered loans	$	453,163	$	437,737	$	418,997	$	419,835
Allowance for loan losses		7,494		-		8,101		-
Non covered loans, net		445,669	$	437,737	$	410,896	$	419,835
Covered loans	$	107,457	$	107,457	$	-	$	-

Accrued interest receivable	$	4,689	$	4,689	$	2,907	$	2,907
FDIC loss-share receivable	$	83,901	$	83,901	$	-	$	-

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	884,187	$	875,317	$	534,242	$	532,050

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	35,049	$	35,049	$	32,421	$	32,425
Other borrowings	$	35,000	$	38,161	$	62,500	$	65,592
Accrued interest payable	$	972	$	972	$	702	$	702

F-70

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 23.

CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF HERITAGE FINANCIALGROUP, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

	December 31,
	2011		2010
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	21,686	$	6,184
Other equity securities, at cost		1,010		1,010
Securities available for sale, at fair value		-		25,465
Investment in subsidiary		99,893		86,149
Premises and equipment, net		450		464
Other assets		1,475		947

Total assets	$	124,514	$	120,219

Liabilities
Other liabilities	$	378	$	879

Stockholders' equity		124,136		119,340

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	124,514	$	120,219

F-71

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 23.

CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF HERITAGE FINANCIALGROUP, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY) (Continued)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Income
Dividends from subsidiary	$	-		$	-		$	1,000
Interest		15			39			102
Gains on sales of securities		-			-			37
Total income		15			39			1,139
				��
Expense
Depreciation		14			13			13
Other expense		903			771			702
Total expense		917			784			715

Income (loss) before income tax benefits and equity in undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of subsidiary		(902	)		(745	)		424

Income tax benefits		356			248			231

Income (loss) before equity in undistributed earnings (distribution in excess of earnings) of subsidiary		(546	)		(497	)		655

Equity in undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of subsidiary		4,371			1,903			(2,307	)

Net income (loss)	$	3,825		$	1,406		$	(1,652	)

F-72

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 23.

CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF HERITAGE FINANCIALGROUP, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY) (Continued)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	3,825		$	1,406		$	(1,652	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		14			13			13
Excess tax shortfall related to stock-based compensation plans		2			14			58
Stock-based compensation expense		216			229			226
Gain on sales of securities		-			-			(37	)
(Equity in undistributed earnings) distributions in excess of earnings of subsidiary		(4,371	)		(1,903	)		2,307
Other operating activities		(1,079	)		99			(225	)
Total adjustments		(5,218	)		(1,548	)		2,343

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(1,393	)		(142	)		690

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Contribution of 50% of proceeds of stock offering to subsidiary		(16	)		(30,730	)		-
Fund ESOP note receivable from conversion and stock offering		-			(3,277	)		-
Contribution to subsidiary		(7,000	)		-			-
Decrease in federal funds sold		-			-			62
Purchase of premises and equipment		-			(2	)		(19	)
Purchases of securities available for sale		-			(79,994	)		(964	)
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		25,000			54,998			1,707
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		-			-			3,562
Proceeds from fair value transfer of securities to bank		590			-			-

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		18,574			(59,005	)		4,348

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from common stock offering		-			61,482			-
Shares released to employee stock ownership plan		620			468			409
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation plans		(2	)		(14	)		(58	)
Purchase of shares, net		(1,310	)		(16	)		(516	)
Dividends paid to stockholders		(987	)		(854	)		(721	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(1,679	)		61,066			(886	)

Net increase in cash and due from banks		15,502			1,919			4,152

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		6,184			4,265			113

Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	21,686		$	6,184		$	4,265

F-73

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 24. STOCK REPURCHASE PLAN

In December 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized another stock repurchase program. The program authorizes the Company to repurchase up to 435,000 shares. Under this program the Company did not repurchase any shares during 2011. The program will expire in December 2012 unless completed sooner or otherwise extended.

NOTE 25. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In February 2012, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement totaling a $50 million notional amount to hedge against interest rate risk on future borrowings in a rising rate environment. The agreement is for 12 years with no cash flow being exchanged until years 4-12. The Company will pay a fixed rate of 3.155% in exchange for 3 month LIBOR on future floating rate borrowings. As a cash flow hedge, the portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative that has been deemed highly effective is recognized in other comprehensive income until the related cash flows from the hedged item are recognized in earnings.

F-74

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act (the “Exchange Act”)) as of December 31, 2011, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of our senior management preceding the filing date of this annual report. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is: (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner; and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of change in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Heritage is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making the assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment and those criteria, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on Heritage’s internal control over financial reporting. This report can be found in Item 8 – Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors

Information concerning the Directors of the Company is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 23, 2012, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

Executive Officers

Information concerning the Executive Officers of the Company is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 23, 2012, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

Audit Committee Matters and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors of the Company has a standing Audit Committee, which has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of that committee are Directors Burger (chair), McGinley and Stanley, all of whom are considered independent under Nasdaq listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Director Burger is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. Additional information concerning the Audit Committee is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 23, 2012 (except for information contained under the heading “Report of the Audit Committee”), a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

Nomination Procedures

Under the Nominating Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee is required to review nominations for election as a director submitted by stockholders addressed to the Company's Secretary in compliance with the Company's charter and bylaws using the same criteria as all other nominations. Those criteria are business experience, education, integrity and reputation, independence, conflicts of interest, diversity, age, number of other directorships and commitments (including charitable organizations), tenure on the Board, attendance at Board and committee meetings, stock ownership, specialized knowledge (such as an understanding of banking, accounting, marketing, finance, regulation and public policy) and a commitment to the Company's communities and shared values, as well as overall experience in the context of the needs of the Board as a whole.

Under the Bylaws of the Company, in order for a stockholder nominee to be eligible for election a director of the Company, the nomination (i) must have been agreed to by the Board of Directors or Nominating Committee or (ii) must have been made by a stockholder who (1) is a stockholder of record on the date of giving the public notice of the date of the meeting as noted below and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, and (2) complies with the notice procedures below. Stockholder nominations must be made by timely notice in writing to the Secretary of the Company. To be timely, a stockholder's notice shall be delivered or mailed to and received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 90 days or more than 120 days prior to the date of the meeting; provided, however, that in the event that less than 100 days' notice or public announcement of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or otherwise transmitted or the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting was first made by the Company, whichever shall first occur. A stockholder's notice must be in writing and set forth (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act or any successor rule or regulation; and (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice: (i) the name and address of such stockholder as they appear on the Company 's books and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made; (ii) the class or series and number of shares of capital stock of the Company that are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner; (iii) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such stockholder and each proposed nominee and any other person or persons (including their names) pursuant to which the nomination(s) are to be made by such stockholder; (iv) a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the persons named in its notice; and (v) any other information relating to such stockholder that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act or any successor rule or regulation. Such stockholder notice must be accompanied by a written consent of each proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. No person shall be eligible for election as a director of the Company unless nominated in accordance with these requirements. The officer of the Company or other person presiding at the meeting shall, if the facts so warrant, determine that a nomination was not made in accordance with such provisions and, if he or she should so determine, he or she shall so declare to the meeting and the defective nomination shall be disregarded.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that the Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of the Company's common stock, file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Company's common stock. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the Company's knowledge, no late reports occurred during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and all other Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

Code of Ethics

In November 2010, the Company adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics based upon the standards set forth under Item 406 of Regulation S-B of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of the Company's directors, officers and employees. This code is available to all interested parties on the Company’s website at www.eheritagebank.com, under Governance Documents in the Investor Relations section.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information concerning executive compensation required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 23, 2012, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 23, 2012, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

See Item 5 for information regarding shares available under the Company’s equity incentive compensation plans.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 23, 2012, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

Information concerning the independence of our directors required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 23, 2012, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning fees and services by our principal accountants required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 23, 2012, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the 2011 fiscal year.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) List of Financial Statements

The following are contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K:

	Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

	Consolidated Balances Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

	Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(a)(2) List of Financial Statement Schedules:

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the information is not required under the related instructions or is not applicable.

(a)(3) List of Exhibits:

Exhibit Number	Document	Reference to Prior Filing or Exhibit Number Attached Hereto

2.1	Plan of Conversion and Reorganization of Heritage MHC	a
2.2	Form of Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Heritage Financial Group, Heritage MHC and Heritage Financial Group, Inc.	a
2.3	Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated as of December 4, 2009 by and among the FDIC, receiver of The Tattnall Bank, Reidsville, Georgia; HeritageBank of the South; and the FDIC in its corporate capacity.	d
2.4	Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated as of February 18, 2011 by and among the FDIC, receiver of Citizens Bank of Effingham, Springfield, Georgia; HeritageBank of the South; and the FDIC in its corporate capacity.	g
2.5	Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated as of August 19, 2011 by and among the FDIC, receiver of First Southern National Bank, Statesboro, Georgia; HeritageBank of the South; and the FDIC in its corporate capacity.	h
2.6	Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated February 23, 2010, between HeritageBank of the South and The Park Avenue Bank	e
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Heritage Financial Group, Inc.	a
3.2	Bylaws of Heritage Financial Group, Inc.	a
4	Form of Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Common Stock Certificate	a
10.1	Employment Agreement between O. Leonard Dorminey and HeritageBank	b*
10.2	Employment Agreement between O. Leonard Dorminey and Heritage Financial Group	b*
10.3	Employment Agreement between Carol W. Slappey and HeritageBank	b*
10.4	Deferred Compensation and Excess/Matching Contribution Plans	b
10.5	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan	b
10.6	Directors’ Retirement Plan	b
10.7	Employee Stock Ownership Plan	b
10.8	Heritage Financial Group 2006 Equity Incentive Plan	c
10.9	Awards made to directors and executive officers under the Heritage Financial Group 2006 Equity Incentive Plan on July 1, 2006 and the forms and agreement in Exhibit 10.10.	c
10.10	Forms of agreements for stock options (including incentive stock options), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted share units under the Heritage Financial Group 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.	c
10.11	Employment Agreement between T. Heath Fountain and HeritageBank	f*
10.12	Employment Agreement between O. Mitchell Smith and HeritageBank	f*
10.13	Employment Agreement between David Durland and HeritageBank	i*
10.14	Heritage Financial Group, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan	j
10.15	Awards made to directors and executive officers under the Heritage Financial Group, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan on July 1, 2011 and the forms and agreement in Exhibit 10.16.	j
10.16	Forms of agreements for stock options (including incentive stock options), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted share units under the Heritage Financial Group, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.	j
14	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics	k
21	Subsidiaries of the Company	k
23	Consent of Accountants	23
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive Officer	31.1
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer	31.2
32	Section 1350 Certifications	32

101

Financial Statements from the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as follows:

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	101.INS
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	101.SCH
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	101.CAL
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	101.DEF
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document	101.LAB
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	101.PRE

_______________________

a	Filed as an exhibit to the Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-123581) filed on May 23, 2010.
b	Filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of Heritage Financial Group (the Predecessor) on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-123581) filed on March 25, 2005.
c	Included as Exhibit 10.11 to the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed by Heritage Financial Group (the Predecessor) with the SEC on March 27, 2007.
d	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed by Heritage Financial Group (the Predecessor) with the SEC on December 8, 2009.
e	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed by Heritage Financial Group (the Predecessor) with the SEC on February 25, 2010.
f	Filed as an exhibit to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-123581) filed on August 9, 2010.
g	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed by Heritage Financial Group, Inc. with the SEC on February 24, 2011.
h	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed by Heritage Financial Group, Inc. with the SEC on August 22, 2011.
i	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed by Heritage Financial Group, Inc. with the SEC on April 21, 2011.
j	Included as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q filed by Heritage Financial Group, Inc. with the SEC on August 15, 2011.
k	Included as an exhibit to the Form 10-K filed by Heritage Financial Group, Inc. with the SEC on March 31, 2011.
*	Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Date:	March 15, 2012	By:	/s/ O. Leonard Dorminey
			O. Leonard Dorminey, President and Chief Executive Officer
			(Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ O. Leonard Dorminey
		O. Leonard Dorminey
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ Antone D. Lehr
		Antone D. Lehr, Chairman of the Board

Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ Joseph C. Burger
		Joseph C. Burger, Vice Chairman of the Board

Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ Douglas J. McGinley
		Douglas J. McGinley, Director

Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ Carol W. Slappey
		Carol W. Slappey, Director

Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ J. Keith Land
		J. Keith Land, Director

Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ J. Lee Stanley
		J. Lee Stanley, Director

Date:	March 15, 2012	/s/ T. Heath Fountain
		T. Heath Fountain, Executive Vice President
		Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Index to Exhibits

23	Consent of Accountants

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive Officer

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer

32	Section 1350 Certifications

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	8th grade Avg

Heritage Financial Inactive 10-K2011 FY Annual report

Content analysis