UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-54685
CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Maryland | | 27-2876363 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
CNL Center at City Commons 450 South Orange Avenue Orlando, Florida | | 32801 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (407) 650-1000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of May 4, 2012 was 5,767,597.
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31 2012 (Unaudited) | | | December 31, 2011 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Real estate investment properties, net | | $ | 82,163,557 | | | $ | — | |
Restricted cash | | | 5,642,540 | | | | — | |
Cash | | | 5,114,930 | | | | 10,001,872 | |
Intangibles, net | | | 1,676,247 | | | | — | |
Loan costs, net | | | 843,593 | | | | — | |
Prepaid and other assets | | | 146,148 | | | | 161,390 | |
Deposits | | | — | | | | 400,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 95,587,015 | | | $ | 10,563,262 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Mortgage note payable | | $ | 63,804,353 | | | $ | — | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 832,657 | | | | 668,120 | |
Due to related parties | | | 313,188 | | | | 192,755 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 64,950,198 | | | | 860,875 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized and unissued | | | — | | | | — | |
Excess shares, $0.01 par value per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized and unissued | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 1,120,000,000 and 7,000,000 shares authorized, respectively; 4,144,861 and 1,357,572 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | | | 41,449 | | | | 13,576 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 35,026,738 | | | | 11,504,283 | |
Accumulated loss | | | (4,172,880 | ) | | | (1,759,580 | ) |
Accumulated distributions | | | (258,490 | ) | | | (55,892 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | | 30,636,817 | | | | 9,702,387 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 95,587,015 | | | $ | 10,563,262 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
CNL HEATHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
| | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | |
| |
Revenues: | | | | |
Rental income from operating leases | | $ | 941,515 | |
| | | | |
Total Revenues | | | 941,515 | |
| | | | |
| |
Expenses: | | | | |
Acquisition fees and expenses | | | 1,899,413 | |
General and administrative | | | 484,048 | |
Asset management fees | | | 70,042 | |
Property management fees | | | 16,378 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 210,196 | |
| | | | |
Total Expenses | | | 2,680,077 | |
| | | | |
| |
Operating Loss | | | (1,738,562 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Other Income (Expense): | | | | |
Interest and other income | | | 101 | |
Interest expense and loan cost amortization | | | (674,839 | ) |
| | | | |
Total Other Expense | | | (674,738 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net Loss | | $ | (2,413,300 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock (basic and diluted) | | $ | (0.96 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Weighted Average Number Of Shares Of Common Stock outstanding (basic and diluted) | | | 2,504,429 | |
| | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and the Year Ended December 31, 2011
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | Capital in | | | | | | | | | Total | |
| | Number of Shares | | | Par Value | | | Excess of Par Value | | | Accumulated Loss | | | Accumulated Distributions | | | Stockholders’ Equity | |
| | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | | 22,222 | | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 199,778 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 200,000 | |
| | | | | | |
Subscriptions received for common stock through through public offering and reinvestment plan | | | 1,331,170 | | | | 13,312 | | | | 13,276,934 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,290,246 | |
| | | | | | |
Stock distributions | | | 4,180 | | | | 42 | | | | (42 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Stock issuance and offering costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,972,387 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,972,387 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,759,580 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,759,580 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Cash distributions, declared and paid ($0.06666 per share) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (55,892 | ) | | | (55,892 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 1,357,572 | | | $ | 13,576 | | | $ | 11,504,283 | | | $ | (1,759,580 | ) | | $ | (55,892 | ) | | $ | 9,702,387 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Subscriptions received for common stock through through public offering and reinvestment plan | | | 2,772,093 | | | | 27,721 | | | | 27,672,203 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 27,699,924 | |
| | | | | | |
Stock distributions | | | 15,196 | | | | 152 | | | | (152 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Stock issuance and offering costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,149,596 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,149,596 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,413,300 | ) | | | | | | | (2,413,300 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Cash distributions, declared and paid ($0.0999 per share) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (202,598 | ) | | | (202,598 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2012 | | | 4,144,861 | | | $ | 41,449 | | | $ | 35,026,738 | | | $ | (4,172,880 | ) | | $ | (258,490 | ) | | $ | 30,636,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | |
Operating Activities: | | | | |
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | | $ | (1,954,009 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Investing Activities: | | | | |
Acquisition of property | | | (83,650,000 | ) |
Changes in restricted cash | | | (5,642,540 | ) |
Other | | | (7,683 | ) |
| | | | |
Net Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities | | | (89,300,223 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Financing Activities: | | | | |
Subscriptions received for common stock through public offering | | | 27,587,629 | |
Payment of stock issuance costs | | | (4,044,440 | ) |
Distributions to stockholders, net of distribution reinvestments | | | (90,303 | ) |
Proceeds from mortgage note payable | | | 71,400,000 | |
Principal payment on mortgage note payable | | | (7,595,647 | ) |
Payment of loan costs | | | (889,949 | ) |
| | | | |
Net Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities | | | 86,367,290 | |
| | | | |
| |
Net decrease in cash | | | (4,886,942 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | | | 10,001,872 | |
| | | | |
Cash at End of Period | | $ | 5,114,930 | |
| | | | |
| |
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Transactions: | | | | |
Amounts incurred but not paid (included in due to related parties): | | | | |
Selling Commissions and Marketing Support Fees | | $ | 228,738 | |
| | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc., formerly known as CNL Properties Trust, Inc., (“the Company”) is a Maryland corporation incorporated on June 8, 2010 that intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In order to better reflect the concentrated investment focus, as described below, the Company amended its amended and restated articles of incorporation on February 9, 2012 to change the name of the Company to CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc.
In February 2012, the Company announced it began placing its investment focus on acquiring properties primarily in the United States within the senior housing and healthcare sectors although the Company may also acquire properties in the lifestyle and lodging sectors. Senior housing asset classes the Company may acquire include active adult communities (age-restricted and age-targeted housing), independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, memory care facilities and skilled nursing facilities. Healthcare asset classes the Company may acquire include medical office buildings, as well as other types of healthcare and wellness-related properties such as physicians’ offices, specialty medical and diagnostic service providers, specialty hospitals, walk-in clinics and outpatient surgery centers, hospitals and inpatient rehabilitative facilities, long-term acute care hospitals, pharmaceutical and medical supply manufacturing facilities, laboratories and research facilities and medical marts. Lifestyle asset classes the Company may acquire are those properties that reflect or are affected by the social, consumption and entertainment values and choices of the Company’s society and generally include ski and mountain resorts, golf courses, attractions (such as amusement parks, waterparks and family entertainment centers), marinas, and other leisure or entertainment-related properties. Lodging asset classes the Company may acquire include resort, boutique and upscale properties or any full service, limited service, extended stay and/or other lodging-related properties. The Company expects to primarily lease its properties to wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS Entities”) and engage independent third-party managers under management agreements to operate the properties as permitted under applicable tax regulations, however, it may also lease its properties to third-party tenants under a triple-net lease. The Company also may invest in and originate mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing.
On June 27, 2011, the Company commenced its initial public offering of up to $3.0 billion of shares of common stock (the “Offering”), including shares being offered from its distribution reinvestment plan (the “Reinvestment Plan”), pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The shares are being offered at $10.00 per share or $9.50 per share pursuant to the Reinvestment Plan unless changed by the board of directors. As of October 5, 2011, the Company received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of the minimum offering amounts of $2.0 million in shares of common stock and the Company commenced operations. Prior to October 5, 2011, the Company was in its development stage and had not commenced operations. As a result, there are no comparative financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: |
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation—The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles of the United States (“GAAP”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s results for the interim period presented. Amounts as of December 31, 2011, included in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets have been derived from the audited consolidated financial
5
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(Continued): |
statements as of that date but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. These accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of December 31, 2011, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries over which it has control. All intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company has no items of other comprehensive income (loss) in the periods presented and therefore, has not included other comprehensive income (loss) or total comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. For example, significant estimates and assumptions are made in connection with the allocation of purchase price. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Allocation of Purchase Price for Real Estate Acquisitions—Upon acquisition of properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building and improvements, tenant improvements and equipment) and identifiable intangible assets (consisting of in-place leases) and allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections using appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation and available market information.
The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and building based on the determination of the fair values of these assets.
The purchase price is allocated to in-place lease intangibles based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of the acquired lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease up periods, including estimates of lost rental income during the expected lease up periods, and costs to execute similar leases such as leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization—Real estate costs related to the acquisition and improvement of properties are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs include all costs that do not extend the useful life of the real estate asset. The Company considers the period of future benefit of an asset to determine its appropriate useful life. Real estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is computed using the straight-line method of accounting over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over 39 years and equipment is depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
6
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(continued): |
Amortization of intangible assets is computed using the straight-line method of accounting over the respective lease term or estimated useful life. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its scheduled expiration, all unamortized costs related to the lease would be written off.
Real Estate Impairments—Real estate assets are reviewed on an ongoing basis to determine whether there are any indicators that the value of the real estate properties (including any related amortizable intangible assets or liabilities) may be impaired. Factors that could trigger an impairment analysis include, among others: (i) significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner of use of the Company’s real estate assets or the strategy of its overall business; (iii) a significant increase in competition; (iv) a significant adverse change in legal factors or an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, which could affect the value of the Company’s real estate assets; or (v) significant negative industry or economic trends. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company will assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition, to the carrying amount of the asset. In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, the Company would recognize an impairment provision to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated fair value. Fair values are generally determined based on incorporating market participant assumptions, discounted cash flow models and the Company’s estimates reflecting the facts and circumstances of each property.
Fair Value Measurements—GAAP emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. GAAP requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. Observable inputs are inputs that the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of ours. When market data inputs are unobservable, the Company utilizes inputs that it believes reflects the Company’s best estimate of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
| • | | Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. |
| • | | Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
| • | | Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on the Company’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. |
Restricted Cash —Certain amounts of cash are deposited in a restricted account controlled by the Company’s lender under the terms of the loan agreement or are restricted to fund future expenditures for the Company’s real estate properties. Such amounts have been classified as restricted cash in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition —Rental revenue from leases is recorded on the straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. The Company’s leases require the tenants to pay certain contractual amounts that are set aside by the Company for replacements of fixed assets and other improvements to the properties. These amounts are and will remain the property of the Company during and after the term of the lease. The amounts are recorded as capital improvement reserve income at the time that they are earned and are included in rental income from operating leases in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
Loan Costs—Financing costs paid in connection with obtaining debt are deferred and amortized over the life of the debt using the effective interest rate.
7
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(continued): |
Net Loss per Share — Net loss per share is calculated based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period in which the Company was operational. For the purposes of determining the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, stock distributions are treated as if they were issued and outstanding for the full period presented. Therefore, the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2012 include stock distributions declared through March 31, 2012 as if they were outstanding as of the beginning of the period presented. The weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were 2,504,429 (including 19,376 shares declared and issued as a stock dividend through March 31, 2012).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements —In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This ASU clarifies the application of existing fair value measurements and disclosure requirements and certain changes to principles and requirements for measuring fair value. This update is to be applied prospectively and is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company acquired the following five senior housing properties:
| | | | | | | | |
Property/Description | | Location | | Date of Acquisition | | Allocated Purchase Price | |
| | | |
Sweetwater Retirement Community | | Billings, MT | | 2/16/2012 | | $ | 16,640,440 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Grand Island | | Grand Island, NE | | 2/16/2012 | | | 13,862,710 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Marion | | Marion, OH | | 2/16/2012 | | | 15,480,587 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Mansfield | | Mansfield, OH | | 2/16/2012 | | | 19,129,186 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Casper | | Casper, WY | | 2/16/2012 | | | 18,937,077 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 84,050,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The senior housing properties above are subject to long-term triple-net leases with a base term of 10 years and two additional five-year renewal options. Annual base rent is equal to the properties’ lease basis multiplied by the lease rate. The lease rate is 7.875% in the initial lease year and will escalate thereafter pursuant to the lease agreements. Annual capital reserve income is paid to the Company based on $300 per unit annually.
The following summarizes the allocation of the purchase price for the above properties, and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired:
| | | | |
| | Total Purchase Price Allocation | |
Land and land improvements | | $ | 5,746,081 | |
Buildings | | | 75,680,273 | |
Equipment | | | 933,313 | |
Intangibles - in-place leases | | | 1,690,333 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 84,050,000 | |
| | | | |
The weighted-average amortization period for intangible in-place leases acquired is 10 years.
8
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
3. | Acquisitions(continued): |
The revenues and net loss attributable to the properties included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated operations were approximately $0.9 million and ($2.1) million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma results of operations of the Company as if each of the properties were acquired as of January 1, 2012 and owned during the three months ended March 31, 2012:
| | | | |
| | Three months ended March 31, 2012 | |
Revenues | | $ | 1,922,754 | |
| | | | |
Net loss(1) | | $ | (792,061 | ) |
| | | | |
Loss per share of common stock (basic and diluted) | | $ | (0.30 | ) |
| | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding (basic and diluted)(2) | | | 2,615,863 | |
| | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Non-recurring acquisition related expenses directly attributable to the acquisition of the five senior housing properties and included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012, of approximately $1.9 million have been eliminated. |
(2) | As a result of the properties being treated as operational since January 1, 2012, the Company assumed approximately 603,303 shares were issued as of January 1, 2012. Consequently the weighted average shares outstanding was adjusted to reflect this amount of shares being issued on January 1, 2012 instead of actual dates on which the shares were issued, and such shares were treated as outstanding as of the beginning of the period presented. |
4. | Real Estate Investment Properties, net: |
As of March 31, 2012, real estate investment properties consisted of the following:
| | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | |
Land and land improvements | | $ | 5,746,081 | |
Buildings | | | 75,680,273 | |
Equipment | | | 933,313 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (196,110 | ) |
| | | | |
| | $ | 82,163,557 | |
| | | | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, depreciation expense on the Company’s real estate investment properties was approximately $0.2 million.
9
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
As of March 31, 2012, the Company owned five real estate investment properties that were 100% leased under operating leases. The leases will expire in February 2022, subject to the tenant’s option to extend the leases for two, additional five-year renewal options. Annual base rent is equal to the properties’ lease basis multiplied by the lease rate. The lease rate is 7.875% in the initial lease year and will escalate thereafter pursuant to the lease agreements. Annual capital reserve income is paid to the Company based on $300 per unit annually. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the tenant is responsible for payment of property taxes, general liability insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, including structural and roof expenses. The tenant is expected to pay directly to taxing authorities for real estate taxes, however, if the tenant does not pay, the Company will be liable.
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received under non-cancellable operating leases as of March 31, 2012:
| | | | |
2012 | | $ | 4,970,551 | |
2013 | | | 6,810,869 | |
2014 | | | 7,021,263 | |
2015 | | | 7,231,656 | |
2016 | | | 7,442,050 | |
Thereafter | | | 41,446,431 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 74,922,820 | |
| | | | |
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s intangible assets as of March 31, 2012 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intangible Assets | | Gross Carrying Amount | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Net Book Value as of March 31, 2012 | |
In place leases | | $ | 1,690,333 | | | $ | (14,086 | ) | | $ | 1,676,247 | |
Amortization expense on the Company’s intangible assets was approximately $0.01 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
10
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
6. | Intangibles, net(continued): |
The estimated future amortization for the Company’s intangible assets as of March 31, 2012 was as follows:
| | | | |
2012 | | $ | 126,775 | |
2013 | | | 169,033 | |
2014 | | | 169,033 | |
2015 | | | 169,033 | |
2016 | | | 169,033 | |
Thereafter | | | 873,340 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 1,676,247 | |
| | | | |
In connection with the closing of the five senior housing properties, the Company entered into a collateralized loan agreement with a lender, providing for a one-year senior facility in the original aggregate principal amount of $71.4 million (the “Loan”). The Loan matures in February 2013. The Loan initially bore interest at LIBOR plus 6.00% and the Company was required to pay down the Loan at an amount equal to 50% of the net offering proceeds collected through the Company’s offering of common stock, as defined in the loan agreement, until the Loan had been paid down to an outstanding principal balance of approximately $54.0 million. The Company met this requirement in April 2012, and for the remainder of the term, monthly interest only payments will be required through maturity, and the Loan will bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%. The Company may prepay the Loan at any time, without prepayment penalty.
The Loan is collateralized by first priority mortgages and deeds of trust on all real property of the properties and by an assignment of all leases and agreements relating to the use and occupancy of the properties. The Loan contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants including limitations on incurrence of additional indebtedness, restrictions on distributions, minimum occupancy at the properties, debt service coverage and minimum tangible net worth. As of March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the aforementioned financial covenants.
The following is a schedule of future principal payments and maturity for the Company’s borrowing as of March 31, 2012:
| | | | |
2012 | | $ | 9,769,853 | |
2013 | | | 54,034,500 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 63,804,353 | |
| | | | |
11
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
The fair market value and carrying value of the mortgage note payable was approximately $63.8 million, respectively as of March 31, 2012 based on then-current rates and spreads the Company would expect to obtain for similar borrowings. Because this methodology includes inputs that are less observable by the public and are not necessarily reflected in active markets, the measurement of the estimated fair values related to our mortgage note payable is categorized as level 3 on the three-level valuation hierarchy. The estimated fair value of accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates the carrying value as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 because of the relatively short maturities of the obligations.
8. | Related Party Arrangements: |
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred the following fees in connection with its Offering:
| | | | |
Selling commissions | | $ | 1,921,434 | |
Marketing support fees | | | 823,472 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,744,906 | |
| | | | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred the following fees and reimbursable expenses as follows:
| | | | |
Reimbursable expenses: | | | | |
Offering costs | | $ | 1,404,690 | |
Operating expenses | | | 385,128 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 1,789,818 | |
| | | | |
| |
Investment services fees | | $ | 1,554,925 | |
Property management fees | | | 16,378 | |
Asset management fees | | | 70,042 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,641,345 | |
| | | | |
12
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
8. | Related Party Arrangements(continued): |
Amounts due to related parties for fees and reimbursable costs and expenses described above were as follows as of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
Reimbursable expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Offering costs | | $ | — | | | $ | 41,416 | |
Operating expenses | | | 68,072 | | | | 69,173 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 68,072 | | | | 110,589 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Selling commissions | | $ | — | | | $ | 57,516 | |
Marketing Support fees | | | 228,738 | | | | 24,650 | |
Property management fees | | | 16,378 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 245,116 | | | | 82,166 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 313,188 | | | $ | 192,755 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Organizational and other offering costs incurred by the Advisor become a liability to the Company only to the extent selling commissions, marketing support fees and organizational and other offering costs do not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of the Offering. The Advisor has incurred on the Company’s behalf approximately an additional $2.9 million of costs in connection with the Offering exceeding the 15% expense cap as of March 31, 2012. These costs will be recognized by the Company in future periods as the Company receives future Offering proceeds to the extent such costs are within such 15% limitation.
The Company maintains an account at a bank in which the Company’s chairman and vice-chairman serve as directors. The Company had deposits at that bank in the amount of approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Public Offering —As of March 31, 2012, the Company had received aggregate offering proceeds of approximately $41.0 million (4.1 million shares) including approximately $0.1 million (14,715 shares) received through its distribution reinvestment plan.
Distributions —During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company declared cash distributions of approximately $0.2 million of which $0.1 million were paid in cash to stockholders and $0.1 million were reinvested pursuant to the Company’s Reinvestment Plan. In addition, the Company declared and made stock distributions of 15,196 shares of common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, 100.0% of the cash distributions paid to stockholders were considered a return of capital to stockholders for federal income tax purposes.
No amounts distributed to stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were required to be or have been treated by the Company as a return of capital for purposes of calculating the stockholders’ return on their invested capital as described in the Company’s advisory agreement. The distribution of new common shares to recipients is non-taxable.
13
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
10. | Commitment and Contingencies: |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material legal proceedings pending or known to be contemplated against the Company.
See Note 8. “Related Party Arrangements” for information on contingent interest due to the Company’s Advisor in connection with its Offering and expenses thereof.
The Company’s board of directors declared a monthly cash distribution of $0.03333 and a monthly stock distribution of 0.002500 shares on each outstanding share of common stock on April 1, 2012 and May 1, 2012. These distributions are to be paid and distributed by June 30, 2012.
During the period April 1, 2012 through May 4, 2012, the Company received additional subscription proceeds of approximately $16.2 million (1.6 million shares).
14
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Introduction
The following discussion is based on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Amounts as of December 31, 2011, included in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date. This information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and the notes thereto, as well as the audited consolidated financial statements, notes and management’s discussion and analysis included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information
Certain statements in this document may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc., formerly known as CNL Properties Trust, Inc., herein also referred to as “we,” “our,” or “us,” includes CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries. We intend that all such forward-looking statements be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable.
All statements, other than statements that relate solely to historical facts, including, among others, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, projected levels of growth, results of operations, projected costs and projected financing needs, are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should,” “continues,” “pro forma” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to, the factors detailed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and other documents filed from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the global impact of the current credit crisis in the U.S. and Europe; changes in general economic conditions in the U.S. or globally (including financial market fluctuations); risks associated with our investment strategy; risks associated with the real estate markets in which we invest; risks associated with the use of debt to finance our business activities, including refinancing and interest rate risk and our failure to comply with our potential debt covenants; our failure to obtain, renew or extend necessary financing or to access the debt or equity markets; competition for properties and/or tenants in the markets in which we engage in business; the impact of current and future environmental, zoning and other governmental regulations affecting our potential properties; our ability to make necessary improvements to properties on a timely or cost-efficient basis; risks related to development projects or acquired property value-add conversions, if applicable (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary permits and/or public opposition to these activities); defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants; failure to lease properties at all or on favorable rents and terms; unknown liabilities in connection with acquired properties or liabilities caused by property managers or operators; our failure to successfully manage growth or integrate acquired properties and operations; material adverse actions or omissions by any joint venture partners; increases in operating costs and other expense items and costs, uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage; the impact of outstanding or potential litigation; risks associated with our tax structuring; our failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust and our ability to protect our intellectual property and the value of our brands.
Management believes these forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, such statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements which are based on current expectations. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time unless otherwise required by law.
15
Overview
CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc., formerly known as CNL Properties Trust, Inc., is a Maryland corporation incorporated on June 8, 2010 that intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) in 2012 for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In order to better reflect our current investment focus, as described below, we amended our amended and restated articles of incorporation on February 9, 2012 to change our name to CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc.
In February 2012, we announced that we will be placing our investment focus on acquiring properties primarily in the United States within the senior housing and healthcare sectors, although we may also acquire properties in the lifestyle and lodging sectors. Senior housing asset classes we may acquire include active adult communities (age-restricted and age-targeted housing), independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, memory care facilities and skilled nursing facilities. Healthcare asset classes we may acquire include medical office buildings, as well as other types of healthcare and wellness-related properties such as physicians’ offices, specialty medical and diagnostic service providers, specialty hospitals, walk-in clinics and outpatient surgery centers, hospitals and inpatient rehabilitative facilities, long-term acute care hospitals, pharmaceutical and medical supply manufacturing facilities, laboratories and research facilities and medical marts. Lifestyle asset classes we may acquire are those properties that reflect or are affected by the social, consumption and entertainment values and choices of our society and generally include ski and mountain resorts, golf courses, attractions (such as amusement parks, waterparks and family entertainment centers), marinas, and other leisure or entertainment-related properties. Lodging asset classes we may acquire may include resort, boutique and upscale properties or any full service, limited service, extended stay and/or other lodging-related properties. We expect to primarily lease our properties to wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS Entities”) and engage independent third-party managers under management agreements to operate the properties as permitted under applicable tax regulations, however, we may also lease our properties to third-party tenants under a triple-net lease. We also may invest in and originate mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing. As of May 4, 2012, we had acquired five senior housing properties, for approximately $84.1 million and obtained financing for a portion of the purchase price. See “Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources - Acquisitions” below for additional information.
We believe recent demographic trends and strong supply and demand indicators present a strong case for an investment focus on the acquisition of senior housing and healthcare properties. We believe that the senior housing and healthcare sectors will continue to provide attractive opportunities as compared to other asset sectors.
Portfolio Analysis
As of March 31, 2012, we owned five senior housing properties that were leased under triple net leases. Under this structure, we report rental income from operations and are not directly exposed to the variability of property-level operating revenues and expenses. While we are not directly impacted by the performance of the underlying properties, we believe that the financial and operational performance of our tenants provides an indication about the health of our tenant and their ability to pay our rent. When evaluating our tenant’s performance, management reviews operating statistics of the underlying properties, including revenue per occupied unit (“RevPOU”) and occupancy levels. RevPOU, which we define as total revenue divided by average number of occupied units during a month, is a performance metric within the healthcare sector. This metric assists us to determine the ability to achieve market rental rates and to obtain revenues from providing care related services.
For the month of March 31, 2012, the occupancy and RevPOU of our portfolio was approximately 96.4% and $3,286, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our primary source of capital has been and is expected to continue to be proceeds we receive from our Offering. Our principal demands for funds will be for:
| • | | the acquisition of real estate and real estate-related assets, |
| • | | the payment of offering and operating expenses, |
| • | | the payment of debt service on our outstanding indebtedness, and |
| • | | the payment of distributions. |
16
Generally, we expect to meet cash needs for items other than acquisitions from our cash flow from operations, and we expect to meet cash needs for acquisitions from net proceeds from our Offering and financings. However, until such time as we are fully invested, we expect to continue to use proceeds from our Offering and financing proceeds to pay a portion of our operating expenses, distributions and debt service.
We intend to strategically leverage our real properties and possibly other assets and use debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of properties and the diversification of our portfolio. Our ability to increase our diversification through borrowing could be adversely affected by credit market conditions which result in lenders reducing or limiting funds available for loans, including loans collateralized by real estate. During times when interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time.
Potential future sources of capital include proceeds from collateralized or uncollateralized financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, other assets, and undistributed operating cash flows and FFO. If necessary, we may use financings or other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.
The number of properties, loans and other permitted investments we may acquire or make will depend on the number of shares sold through our Offering of common stock and the resulting amount of the net offering proceeds available for investment. If the number of shares sold is substantially less than the maximum amount of the offering, we will likely make only a limited number of investments and will not achieve significant diversification of our investments.
Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Common Stock Offering
To date, our primary source of capital was the proceeds from our Offering. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we received aggregate offering proceeds of approximately $27.7 million (2.8 million shares) including approximately $0.1 million (11,820 shares) received through our Reinvestment plan. During the period April 1, 2012 through May 4, 2012, we received additional subscription proceeds of approximately $16.2 million (1.6 shares). We expect to continue to raise capital under our Offering.
Borrowing
We have borrowed and intend to continue to borrow money to acquire properties and to pay certain related fees and to cover periodic shortfalls between distributions paid and cash flows from operating activities. In general, we have pledged our assets in connection with our borrowing. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we borrowed approximately $71.4 million in connection with the acquisition of five senior housing properties. In addition, we incurred approximately $0.9 million in loan costs in connection with the transaction. As of March 31, 2012, we had approximately $5.6 million of cash held in an escrow account with the lender, as required by the Loan Agreement. As of March 31, 2012, we had an aggregate debt leverage ratio of approximately 66.9%. Our target leverage ratio is between 40% to 60% debt to total assets; however, during our early growth period leverage may be higher for a period of time.
In connection with the closing of the five senior housing properties, we entered into a collateralized loan agreement with a lender, providing for a one-year senior facility in the original aggregate principal amount of $71.4 million (the “Loan”). The Loan matures in February 2013. The Loan initially bore interest at LIBOR plus 6.00% and we were required to pay down the Loan at an amount equal to 50% of our net offering proceeds collected through our offering of common stock, as defined in the loan agreement, until the Loan had been paid down to an outstanding principal balance of approximately $54.0 million. We met this requirement in April 2012, and for the remainder of the term, monthly interest only payments will be required through maturity, and the Loan will bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%. We may prepay the Loan at any time, without prepayment penalty. As of the date of this filing, we have begun the process to refinance the outstanding principal balance with long-term fixed rate debt.
The Loan is collateralized by first priority mortgages and deeds of trust on all real property of the properties and by an assignment of all leases and agreements relating to the use and occupancy of the properties. The Loan contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants including limitations on incurrence of additional indebtedness, restrictions on distributions, minimum occupancy at the properties, debt service coverage and minimum tangible net worth. As of March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with the aforementioned financial covenants.
17
Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Acquisitions
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we acquired the following real estate investment properties:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Property/Description | | Location | | Date of Acquisition | | | Allocated Purchase Price | |
Sweetwater Retirement Community | | Billings, MT | | | 2/16/2012 | | | $ | 16,640,440 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Grand Island | | Grand Island, NE | | | 2/16/2012 | | | | 13,862,710 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Marion | | Marion, OH | | | 2/16/2012 | | | | 15,480,587 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Mansfield | | Mansfield, OH | | | 2/16/2012 | | | | 19,129,186 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | | | |
Primrose Retirement Community of Casper | | Casper, WY | | | 2/16/2012 | | | | 18,937,077 | |
One senior housing property | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 84,050,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
The senior housing properties above are subject to long-term triple-net leases. The leases expire in February 2022 subject to the tenant’s option to extend the lease for two additional five year renewal options. Annual base rent is equal to the properties’ lease basis multiplied by the lease rate. The lease rate is 7.875% in the initial lease year and will escalate thereafter pursuant to the lease agreements. Annual capital reserve income is paid to us based on $300 per unit annually. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the tenant is responsible for payment of property taxes, general liability insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, including structural and roof expenses. The tenant is expected to pay directly to taxing authorities for real estate taxes, however, if the tenant does not pay, we will be liable.
Stock Issuance and Offering Costs
Under the terms of the Offering, certain affiliates are entitled to receive selling commissions and a marketing support fee of up to 7% and 3%, respectively, of gross offering proceeds on shares sold. In addition, affiliates are entitled to reimbursement of actual expenses incurred in connection with the Offering, such as filing fees, legal, accounting, printing, and due diligence expense reimbursements, which are recorded as stock issuance and offering costs and deducted from stockholders’ equity. In accordance with our articles of incorporation, the total amount of selling commissions, marketing support fees, and other organizational and offering costs paid by us may not exceed 15% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds. Offering costs are generally funded by our Advisor and subsequently reimbursed by us subject to this limitation.
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred approximately $4.1 million in stock issuance and Offering costs. The Advisor had incurred approximately $2.9 million of additional costs in connection with the offering, exceeding the 15% limitation, on our behalf as of March 31, 2012. These costs will be recognized by us in future periods as we receive future offering proceeds to the extent that the costs are within the 15% limitation.
18
Distributions
Once we qualify as a REIT, we will be required to make distributions, other than capital gain distributions, to our stockholders each year in the amount of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. We may make distributions in the form of cash or other property, including distributions of our own securities. We expect to generate little, if any, cash flow or funds from operations available for distribution until we make substantial investments. Until we have sufficient cash flow or funds from operations, we have decided and may continue to make stock distributions or to fund all or a portion of cash distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations or funds from operations, such as from cash flows generated by financing activities.
On July 29, 2011, our board of directors authorized a distribution policy providing for monthly cash distribution of $0.03333 (which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 4%) together with stock distribution of 0.002500 shares of common stock (which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 3%) for a total annualized distribution of 7% on each outstanding share of common stock (based on the $10.00 offering price) payable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on the first business day of each month. Our board authorized a policy providing for distributions of cash and stock rather than solely of cash in order to retain cash for investment opportunities.
The amount of distributions declared to our stockholders will be determined by our Board of Directors and is dependent upon a number of factors, including:
| • | | Sources of cash available for distribution such as current year and inception to date cumulative cash flows from operating activities, Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Modified Funds from Operations (“MFFO”), as well as, expected future long-term stabilized cash flows, FFO and MFFO; |
| • | | The proportion of distributions paid in cash compared to the amount being reinvested through our reinvestment or distributions of stock; |
| • | | Limitations and restrictions contained in the terms of our current and future indebtedness concerning the payment of distributions; and |
| • | | Other factors such as the avoidance of distribution volatility, our objective of continuing to qualify as a REIT, capital requirements, the general economic environment and other factors. |
Distributions shall be paid quarterly and will be calculated for each stockholder as of the first day of each month the stockholder has been a stockholder of record in such quarter. The cash portion of such distribution shall be payable and the distribution of shares will be issued on or before the last day of the applicable quarter; however, in no circumstance will the cash distribution and the stock distribution be paid on the same day. Fractional shares of common stock accruing as distributions will be rounded to the nearest hundredth when issued on the distribution date. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we distributed 15,196 shares of common stock.
The following table represents total cash distributions declared, distributions reinvested and cash distributions per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012. We commenced operations on October 5, 2011, as such there were no distributions declared during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Paid in Cash | |
Cash Distributions Per Share | | | Total Cash Distributions Declared | | | Distributions Reinvested (1) | | | Cash Distributions(2) | | | Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities(3) | |
$ | 0.09999 | | | $ | 202,598 | | | $ | 112,295 | | | $ | 90,303 | | | $ | — | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Distributions reinvested may be dilutive to stockholders to the extent that they are not covered by cash flows from operations, FFO and MFFO and such shortfalls are instead covered by proceeds from our Offering. |
(2) | Cash flows from operating activities calculated in accordance with GAAP are not necessarily indicative of the amount of cash available to pay distributions. For example, GAAP requires that the payment of acquisition fees and costs be classified as a use of cash in operating activities in the statement of cash flows, which directly reduces the measure of cash flows from operations. However, acquisition fees and costs are paid for with proceeds from our Offering as opposed to operating cash flows. Additionally, the board of directors also uses other measures such as FFO and MFFO in order to evaluate the level of distributions. |
(3) | For the three months ended March 31, 2012, cash distributions paid to stockholders were 100% funded with proceeds from our Offering. |
19
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, 100.0 % of the cash distributions paid to stockholders were considered a return of capital to stockholders for federal income tax purposes. No amounts distributed to stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2012, were required to be or have been treated by us as a return of capital for purposes of calculating the stockholders’ return on their invested capital as described in our advisory agreement. The distribution of new common shares to the recipients is non-taxable.
Our board of directors declared a monthly cash distribution of $0.03333 and a monthly stock distribution of 0.002500 shares on each outstanding share of common stock on April 1, 2012 and May 1, 2012. These distributions are to be paid and distributed by June 30, 2012.
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we used approximately $2.0 million of net cash in operating activities. Approximately $1.9 million of such amount were acquisition fees and expenses which were funded from proceeds of our Offering. The balance was primarily general and administrative expenses and asset management fees in excess of our rental income from operating leases from our real estate investments for the period. Because we have only recently acquired properties and are in our acquisition stage, the rental income from operating leases from our properties is not yet sufficient to fund all of our expenses. Additionally, acquisition fees and expenses are funded with offering or debt proceeds even though they are required to be shown as a use of operating cash in accordance with GAAP. Until such time as we generate sufficient rental income from operating leases from our investments, we expect to continue to fund such amounts with offering proceeds.
Results of Operations
From the time of our formation on June 8, 2010 through October 4, 2011, we had not commenced operations because we were in our development stage and had not received the minimum required offering amount of $2.0 million in shares of common stock. Operations commenced on October 5, 2011, when aggregate subscription proceeds in excess of the minimum offering amount were released to us from escrow. As a result, there are no comparative financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012, are not indicative of future performance due to the limited time in which we have been operational and the fact that we completed our first property acquisitions during the first quarter. As we continue to acquire properties, we expect to have increased revenues and incur greater expenses in each of the above categories.
The following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Rental Income from Operating Leases. Rental income from operating leases was approximately $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as a result of the five senior housing properties acquired in February 2012.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were approximately $0.5 million and were comprised primarily of personnel expenses of affiliates of our Advisor, directors’ and officers’ insurance, accounting and legal fees, and board of director fees.
Acquisition Fees and Expenses.Acquisition fees and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were approximately $1.9 million primarily relating to the five senior housing properties acquired in February 2012. This amount includes an investment services fee of approximately $1.6 million that was paid to our Advisor for services in connection with identifying, negotiating and closing on the five senior housing properties acquired in February 2012.
Asset Management Fees. We incurred approximately $0.1 million in asset management fees payable to our Advisor during the three months ended March 31, 2012, as a result of the five senior housing properties acquired.
20
Property Management Fees. We incurred approximately $0.02 million in property management fees payable to our property manager during the three months ended March 31, 2012, as a result of its services in managing the property operations of our five senior housing properties.
Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was approximately $0.2 million and was comprised of depreciation and amortization of the buildings, equipment, land improvements and in-place leases related to our five senior housing properties.
Interest Expense and Loan Cost Amortization. Interest expense and loan cost amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was approximately $0.7 million consisting primarily of interest expense and loan cost amortization relating to debt obtained which is collateralized by our five senior housing properties.
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, that may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of properties, loans and other permitted investments, other than those referred to in the risk factors identified in “Part II, Item 1A” of this report and the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, National Association Real Estate Investment Trust (“NAREIT”), promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or (“FFO”), which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under GAAP.
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT. NAREIT defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property, asset impairment write-downs, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or is requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value of the property. We believe that, because real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income or loss. However, FFO and modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or loss in its applicability in evaluating operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses as items that are expensed under GAAP and accounted for as operating expenses. Our management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment
21
and operation. While other start up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after its acquisition activity ceases. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association (“IPA”), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a non-listed REIT. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we acquired our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry.
We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: MFFO, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income or loss: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to remove the impact of GAAP straight-line adjustments from rental revenues); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, and unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized.
Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income or loss. These expenses are paid in cash by us. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property.
Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. For example, acquisitions costs are funded from our subscription proceeds and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different non-listed REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way and as such comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flows available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of its liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including its ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in
22
conjunction with other GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure in an offering such as ours where the price of a share of common stock is a stated value and there is no net asset value determination during the offering stage and for a period thereafter. MFFO is useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. FFO and MFFO are not useful measures in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO and MFFO.
Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust its calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to FFO and MFFO for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
| | | | |
Net Loss | | $ | (2,413,300 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 210,196 | |
| | | | |
FFO | | | (2,203,104 | ) |
Acquisition fees and expenses(1) | | | 1,899,413 | |
Straight-line adjustments for leases(2) | | | (108,007 | ) |
| | | | |
MFFO | | $ | (411,698 | ) |
| | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding (basic and diluted) | | | 2,504,429 | |
| | | | |
FFO per share (basic and diluted) | | $ | (0.88 | ) |
| | | | |
MFFO per share (basic and diluted) | | $ | (0.16 | ) |
| | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | In evaluating investments in real estate, management differentiates the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. By adding back acquisition expenses, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information of its operating performance and will also allow comparability between different real estate entities regardless of their level of acquisition activities. Acquisition expenses include payments to our Advisor or third parties. Acquisition expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income or (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid or accrued acquisition expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property. |
(2) | Under GAAP, rental receipts are allocated to periods using various methodologies. This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items (to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments, providing insight on the contractual cash flows of such lease terms and debt investments, and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2012.
23
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents our contractual obligations and the related payment periods as of March 31, 2012:
Contractual Obligations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period | |
| | Less than 1 year | | | Years 1-3 | | | Years 3-5 | | | More than 5 Years | | | Total | |
Mortgage note payable (principal and interest) | | $ | 11,218,325 | | | $ | 54,281,407 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 65,499,732 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See Item 1. “Financial Statements” and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for a summary of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Item 1. “Financial Information” for a summary of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks |
We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire properties and to make loans and other permitted investments. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we expect to borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available, and in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. With regard to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.
We may be exposed to foreign currency exchange rate movements in the event that we invest outside of the United States. At such time as we have foreign investments, we will evaluate various foreign currency risk mitigating strategies in an effort to minimize any impact on earnings.
The following is a schedule as of March 31, 2012, of our variable rate debt maturities for the remainder of 2012 and each of the next four years, and thereafter (principal maturities only):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Expected Maturities | | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | | | Fair Value | |
Variable rate debt | | $ | 9,769,853 | | | $ | 54,034,500 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 63,804,353 | | | $ | 63,804,353 | (2) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average interest rate on variable debt(1) | | | LIBOR + 3.25 | % | | | LIBOR + 3.25 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | The 30-day LIBOR rate was approximately 0.24% at March 31, 2012. |
(2) | The estimated fair value of our variable rate debt was determined using discounted cash flows based on market interest rates as of March 31, 2012. We determined market rates through discussions with our existing lenders pricing our loans with similar terms and current rates and spreads. |
We estimate that the fair value of our fixed rate debt approximates the carrying value as of March 31, 2012 based upon the recent closing of our debt.
24
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.
We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined under Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings - None |
We have updated a number of the risk factors affecting our business since those presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Part I, Item 1A, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Except for revisions to the risk factors below, there have been no material changes in our assessment of our risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact our or our tenants’ reported financial performance.Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Commission, entities that create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on our reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements. Similarly, these changes could have a material impact on our tenants’ reported financial condition or results of operations and affect their preferences regarding leasing real estate. In such event, tenants may determine not to lease properties from us, or, if applicable, exercise their option to renew their leases with us. This in turn could cause a delay in investing our offering proceeds, make it more difficult for us to enter into leases on terms we find favorable and impact the distributions to stockholders.
Cyber security risks and cyber incidents could adversely affect our business and disrupt operations.Cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. These incidents can include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents could include, but are not limited to, disrupted operations, misstated financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cyber security protection costs, litigation and reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
During the period covered by this quarterly report, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, and we did not repurchase any of our securities.
25
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
On June 27, 2011, our Registration Statement (File No. 333-168129), covering a public offering of up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock, was declared effective by the SEC, and our Offering commenced and is ongoing. The use of proceeds from our Offering was as follows as of March 31, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | | Payments to Affiliates(2) | | | Payments to Others | |
Shares registered | | | 300,000,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Aggregate price of offering amount registered | | $ | 3,000,000,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold(1) | | | 4,103,268 | | | | | | | | | |
Aggregate amount sold | | $ | 40,990,170 | | | | | | | | | |
Offering expenses(3) | | | (5,893,245 | ) | | $ | (3,824,425 | ) | | $ | (2,068,820 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net offering proceeds to the issuer | | | 35,096,925 | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings, net of loan costs | | | 70,410,051 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net offering proceeds and borrowings | | | 105,506,976 | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of Real Estate | | | (84,050,000 | ) | | | | | | | (84,050,000 | ) |
Payment of acquisition fees and expenses | | | (2,791,726 | ) | | | (1,579,271 | ) | | | (1,212,455 | ) |
Restricted cash accounts(4) | | | (5,632,690 | ) | | | | | | | (5,632,690 | ) |
Repayment of borrowings | | | (7,595,647 | ) | | | | | | | (7,595,647 | ) |
Payment of distributions(5) | | | (258,490 | ) | | | (3,704 | ) | | | (254,786 | ) |
Payment of lease costs | | | (7,683 | ) | | | | | | | (7,683 | ) |
Payment of operating expenses(3) | | | (55,810 | ) | | | (55,810 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unused proceeds from Offering and borrowings | | $ | 5,114,930 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Excludes unregistered shares. |
(2) | Represents direct or indirect payments to directors, officers, or general partners of the issuer or their associates; to persons owning 10% or more of any class of equity securities or the issuer; and to affiliates of the issuer. |
(3) | Offering expenses paid to affiliates includes selling commissions and marketing support fees paid to the Managing Dealer of our Offering (all or a portion of which may be paid to unaffiliated participating brokers by the Managing Dealer). Reimbursements to our Advisor of expenses of the Offering that it has incurred on our behalf from unrelated parties such as legal fees, auditing fees, printing costs, and registration fees are included in payments to others for purposes of this table. This table does not include amounts incurred by the Advisor in excess of 15% limitation described in the footnotes to the accompanying financial statements. |
(4) | Represents amounts in cash reserve accounts established by lenders for property expenses. |
(5) | Until such time as we have sufficient operating cash flows from our assets, we will pay distributions, debt service and/or operating expenses from net proceeds of our Offering and borrowings. The amounts presented above represent the net proceeds used for such purposes as of March 31, 2012. Distributions paid includes amounts reinvested pursuant to our distributions reinvestment plan of $139,796 (14,715 shares). |
We intend to pay offering expenses, acquire properties and make other permitted investments with proceeds from the Offering. In addition, we have paid, and until such time as we have sufficient operating cash flows from our assets, we will continue to pay distributions and operating expenses from our net proceeds from our Offering.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities -None |
Item 4: | Mine Safety Disclosure-Not Applicable |
Item 5. | Other Information -None |
26
The exhibits required by this item are set forth in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are filed or incorporated as part of this report.
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, on the 11th day of May 2012.
| | |
CNL HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC. |
| |
By: | | /s/ Stephen H. Mauldin |
| | STEPHEN H. MAULDIN |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
By: | | /s/ Joseph T. Johnson |
| | JOSEPH T. JOHNSON |
| | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) |
28
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(Filed herewith.) |
| |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(Filed herewith.) |
| |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc., Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(Filed herewith.) |
| |
101 | | The following materials from CNL Healthcare Trust, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language); (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholder Equity, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
| | * Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those section |
29