UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-54685
CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Maryland | | 27-2876363 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
CNL Center at City Commons 450 South Orange Avenue Orlando, Florida | | 32801 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (407) 650-1000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of August 4, 2014 was 82.5 million.
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Real estate assets: | | | | | | | | |
Real estate investment properties, net (including VIEs $89,936 and $72,053, respectively) | | $ | 1,208,711 | | | $ | 848,791 | |
Real estate under development, including land (including VIEs $15,734 and $16,210, respectively) | | | 16,674 | | | | 17,409 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total real estate assets, net | | | 1,225,385 | | | | 866,200 | |
| | |
Intangibles, net (including VIEs $4,139 and $4,535, respectively) | | | 84,375 | | | | 52,400 | |
Cash (including VIEs $576 and $727, respectively) | | | 64,773 | | | | 44,209 | |
Investments in unconsolidated entities | | | 16,514 | | | | 18,438 | |
Loan costs, net (including VIEs $1,133 and $912, respectively) | | | 10,233 | | | | 7,919 | |
Other assets (including VIEs $587 and $21, respectively) | | | 8,085 | | | | 6,445 | |
Deposits | | | 6,896 | | | | 8,892 | |
Note receivable from related party | | | 6,046 | | | | 3,949 | |
Deferred rent (including VIEs $185 and $104, respectively) | | | 4,037 | | | | 2,782 | |
Restricted cash (including VIEs $257 and $257, respectively) | | | 5,680 | | | | 2,839 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,432,024 | | | $ | 1,014,073 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage and other notes payable (including VIEs $62,757 and $52,596, respectively) | | $ | 599,424 | | | $ | 438,107 | |
Revolving credit facility | | | 210,615 | | | | 98,500 | |
Other liabilities (including VIEs $1,410 and $939, respectively) | | | 21,250 | | | | 7,243 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (including VIES $373 and $309, respectively) | | | 14,050 | | | | 7,887 | |
Due to related parties (including VIEs $86 and $112, respectively) | | | 4,420 | | | | 3,308 | |
Accrued development costs (including VIEs $3,060 and $7,047, respectively) | | | 3,060 | | | | 7,047 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 852,819 | | | | 562,092 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Redeemable noncontrolling interests | | | 568 | | | | — | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 200,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Excess shares, $0.01 par value per share, 300,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 1,120,000 shares authorized; 78,005 and 58,308 shares issued and 77,811 and 58,218 shares outstanding, respectively | | | 778 | | | | 582 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 666,009 | | | | 500,361 | |
Accumulated loss | | | (55,406 | ) | | | (30,580 | ) |
Accumulated distributions | | | (30,715 | ) | | | (17,423 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (2,029 | ) | | | (959 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 578,637 | | | | 451,981 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 1,432,024 | | | $ | 1,014,073 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The abbreviation VIEs above means variable interest entities.
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income from operating leases | | $ | 10,363 | | | $ | 4,069 | | | $ | 20,085 | | | $ | 7,553 | |
Resident fees and services | | | 30,518 | | | | 4,527 | | | | 52,474 | | | | 8,845 | |
Tenant reimbursement income | | | 1,379 | | | | 10 | | | | 2,830 | | | | 10 | |
Interest income on note receivable from related party | | | 204 | | | | 3 | | | | 350 | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 42,464 | | | | 8,609 | | | | 75,739 | | | | 16,411 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | | 22,567 | | | | 3,331 | | | | 38,987 | | | | 6,548 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,935 | | | | 1,568 | | | | 3,692 | | | | 2,677 | |
Acquisition fees and expenses | | | 4,792 | | | | 2,366 | | | | 11,997 | | | | 2,944 | |
Asset management fees | | | 1,049 | | | | 598 | | | | 2,819 | | | | 1,587 | |
Property management fees | | | 2,124 | | | | 485 | | | | 3,760 | | | | 941 | |
Contingent purchase price consideration adjustment | | | (1,321 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,321 | ) | | | — | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 14,699 | | | | 2,563 | | | | 26,561 | | | | 4,882 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 45,845 | | | | 10,911 | | | | 86,495 | | | | 19,579 | |
| | | | |
Operating loss | | | (3,381 | ) | | | (2,302 | ) | | | (10,756 | ) | | | (3,168 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and other income | | | 12 | | | | 1 | | | | 20 | | | | 2 | |
Interest expense and loan cost amortization | | | (7,570 | ) | | | (1,680 | ) | | | (13,105 | ) | | | (4,915 | ) |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities | | | (1,362 | ) | | | 1,182 | | | | (1,013 | ) | | | 1,460 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other expense | | | (8,920 | ) | | | (497 | ) | | | (14,098 | ) | | | (3,453 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Loss before income taxes | | | (12,301 | ) | | | (2,799 | ) | | | (24,854 | ) | | | (6,621 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (2 | ) | | | (31 | ) | | | 28 | | | | (18 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,303 | ) | | $ | (2,830 | ) | | $ | (24,826 | ) | | $ | (6,639 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (12,303 | ) | | $ | (2,830 | ) | | $ | (24,826 | ) | | $ | (6,639 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share of common stock (basic and diluted) | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.37 | ) | | $ | (0.23 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding (basic and diluted) | | | 72,858 | | | | 32,486 | | | | 67,979 | | | | 28,432 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,303 | ) | | $ | (2,830 | ) | | $ | (24,826 | ) | | $ | (6,639 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments | | | (723 | ) | | | — | | | | (946 | ) | | | — | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments of equity method investments | | | (98 | ) | | | 211 | | | | (124 | ) | | | 131 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (821 | ) | | | 211 | | | | (1,070 | ) | | | 131 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Comprehensive loss | | | (13,124 | ) | | | (2,619 | ) | | | (25,896 | ) | | | (6,508 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (13,124 | ) | | $ | (2,619 | ) | | $ | (25,896 | ) | | $ | (6,508 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited) and the Year Ended December 31, 2013
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | Capital in | | | | | | | | | Other | | | Total | | | | | Redeemable | |
| | Number | | | Par | | | Excess of | | | Accumulated | | | Accumulated | | | Comprehensive | | | Stockholders’ | | | | | Noncontrolling | |
| | of Shares | | | Value | | | Par Value | | | Loss | | | Distributions | | | Loss | | | Equity | | | | | Interest | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | | 18,446 | | | $ | 184 | | | $ | 156,200 | | | $ | (12,480 | ) | | $ | (3,253 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | 140,651 | | | | | $ | — | |
Subscriptions received for common stock through public offering and reinvestment plan | | | 38,798 | | | | 388 | | | | 386,975 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 387,363 | | | | | | — | |
Stock distributions | | | 1,063 | | | | 11 | | | | (11 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | — | |
Redemptions of common stock | | | (89 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (826 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (827 | ) | | | | | — | |
Stock issuance and offering costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (41,977 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (41,977 | ) | | | | | — | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (18,100 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (18,100 | ) | | | | | — | |
Other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (959 | ) | | | (959 | ) | | | | | — | |
Cash distributions, declared and paid or reinvested ($0.39996 per share) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (14,170 | ) | | | — | | | | (14,170 | ) | | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | | | 58,218 | | | | 582 | | | | 500,361 | | | | (30,580 | ) | | | (17,423 | ) | | | (959 | ) | | | 451,981 | | | | | | — | |
Subscriptions received for common stock through public offering and reinvestment plan | | | 18,713 | | | | 187 | | | | 188,944 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 189,131 | | | | | | — | |
Stock distributions | | | 984 | | | | 10 | | | | (10 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | — | |
Redemptions of common stock | | | (104 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (945 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (946 | ) | | | | | —�� | |
Stock issuance and offering costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (20,341 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (20,341 | ) | | | | | — | |
Cash distributions declared and paid or reinvested ($0.2028 per share) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13,292 | ) | | | — | | | | (13,292 | ) | | | | | — | |
Distribution to holder of promoted interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,000 | ) | | | | | — | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (24,826 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (24,826 | ) | | | | | — | |
Other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,070 | ) | | | (1,070 | ) | | | | | — | |
Contribution from redeemable noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 568 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2014 | | | 77,811 | | | $ | 778 | | | $ | 666,009 | | | $ | (55,406 | ) | | $ | (30,715 | ) | | $ | (2,029 | ) | | $ | 578,637 | | | | | $ | 568 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows provided by operating activities | | $ | 11,312 | | | $ | 3,176 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of properties | | | (353,383 | ) | | | (69,455 | ) |
Development of properties | | | (22,111 | ) | | | (6,391 | ) |
Issuance of note receivable to related party | | | (1,964 | ) | | | (1,813 | ) |
Investment in unconsolidated entities | | | — | | | | (12,176 | ) |
Changes in restricted cash | | | (2,820 | ) | | | (782 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | | (1,461 | ) | | | (79 | ) |
Payment of tenant improvements and leasing costs | | | (310 | ) | | | — | |
Deposits on real estate | | | (6,266 | ) | | | (4,359 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows used in investing activities | | | (388,315 | ) | | | (95,055 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Subscriptions received for common stock through public offering | | | 181,867 | | | | 174,852 | |
Payment of stock issuance and offering costs | | | (19,919 | ) | | | (18,525 | ) |
Distributions to stockholders, net of distribution reinvestments | | | (6,027 | ) | | | (2,322 | ) |
Distribution to holder of promoted interest | | | (2,000 | ) | | | — | |
Contribution from redeemable noncontrolling interest | | | 568 | | | | — | |
Redemptions of common stock | | | (380 | ) | | | (219 | ) |
Draws under revolving credit facility | | | 112,115 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from mortgage and other notes payable | | | 138,061 | | | | 92,616 | |
Principal payments on mortgage and other notes payable | | | (4,031 | ) | | | (115,910 | ) |
Lender deposits | | | (215 | ) | | | (67 | ) |
Payment of loan costs | | | (2,472 | ) | | | (1,693 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows provided by financing activities | | | 397,567 | | | | 128,732 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net increase in cash | | | 20,564 | | | | 36,853 | |
Cash at beginning of period | | | 44,209 | | | | 18,262 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 64,773 | | | $ | 55,115 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Amounts incurred but not paid (including amounts due to related parties): | | | | | | | | |
Stock issuance and offering costs | | $ | 1,175 | | | $ | 851 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loan costs | | $ | 394 | | | $ | 169 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investment in unconsolidated entities | | $ | 220 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | 62 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accrued development costs | | $ | 3,060 | | | $ | 2,222 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Redemptions payable | | $ | 688 | | | $ | 205 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Assumption of mortgage note payable on acquisition of property | | $ | (27,286 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Contingent purchase price consideration | | $ | (8,500 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments | | $ | (2,029 | ) | | $ | 131 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation incorporated on June 8, 2010 that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with the year ended December 31, 2012.
The Company is externally advised by CNL Healthcare Corp. (the “Advisor”) and its property manager is CNL Healthcare Manager Corp. (the “Property Manager”), each of which is a Florida corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of CNL Financial Group, LLC, the Company’s sponsor. CNL Financial Group, LLC is an affiliate of CNL Financial Group, Inc. (“CNL”). The Advisor is responsible for managing the Company’s affairs on a day-to-day basis and for identifying and making acquisitions and investments on behalf of the Company pursuant to an advisory agreement among the Company, the operating partnership and the Advisor. Substantially all of the Company’s acquisition, operating, administrative and certain property management services are provided by affiliates of the Advisor and the Property Manager. In addition, third-party sub-property managers have been engaged by the Company to provide certain property management services.
On June 27, 2011, the Company commenced its initial public offering of up to $3.0 billion of common stock (the “Offering”), including shares being offered from its distribution reinvestment plan (the “Reinvestment Plan”), pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The shares were initially being offered at $10 per share and effective December 11, 2013 are being offered at $10.14 per share, or $9.64 per share pursuant to the Reinvestment Plan. The Company plans to extend the Offering through the effective date of a subsequent registration statement for a follow-on offering.
The Company’s investment focus is on acquiring a diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate or real estate-related assets, primarily in the United States, within the senior housing, medical office, post-acute care and acute care asset classes. The types of senior housing that the Company may acquire include active adult communities (age-restricted and age-targeted housing), independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and memory care facilities. The types of medical offices that the Company may acquire include medical office buildings, specialty medical and diagnostic service facilities, surgery centers, outpatient rehabilitation facilities, and other facilities designed for clinical services. The types of post-acute care facilities that the Company may acquire include skilled nursing facilities, long-term acute care hospitals and inpatient rehabilitative facilities. The types of acute care facilities that the Company may acquire include general acute care hospitals and specialty surgical hospitals. The Company views, manages and evaluates its portfolio homogeneously as one collection of healthcare assets with a common goal to maximize revenues and property income regardless of the asset class or asset type.
The Company primarily expects to lease its properties to third-party tenants under triple-net or similar lease structures, where the tenant bears all or substantially all of the costs including cost increases, for real estate taxes, utilities, insurance and ordinary repairs. However, the Company may also invest through other strategic investment types aimed to maximize stockholder value by generating sustainable cash flow growth and increasing the value of the Company’s healthcare assets, including leasing properties to wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) and engaging independent third-party managers under management agreements to operate the properties as permitted under REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”). In addition, the Company expects most investments will be wholly owned, although, the Company has and may continue to invest through partnerships with other entities where the Company believes it is appropriate and beneficial. The Company has and expects to continue to invest in new property developments or properties which have not reached full stabilization. Finally, the Company also may invest in and originate mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing investment types. The Company generally makes loans to the owners of properties to enable them to acquire land, buildings, or to develop property. In exchange, the owner generally grants the Company a first lien or collateralized interest in a participating mortgage collateralized by the property or by interests in the entity that owns the property.
6
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation — The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair statement of the Company’s results for the interim period presented. Operating results for the quarter or six months ended June 30, 2014 may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. Amounts as of December 31, 2013 included in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements as of that date but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts, the accounts of wholly owned subsidiaries or subsidiaries for which the Company has a controlling interest, the accounts of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary, and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which the Company has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In accordance with the guidance for the consolidation of VIEs, the Company analyzes its variable interests, including loans, leases, guarantees, and equity investments, to determine if the entity in which it has a variable interest is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company’s analysis includes both quantitative and qualitative reviews. The Company bases its quantitative analysis on the forecasted cash flows of the entity, and its qualitative analysis on its review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including decision-making ability and financial agreements. The Company also uses its quantitative and qualitative analyses to determine if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, and if such determination is made, it includes the accounts of the VIE in its consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. For example, significant assumptions are made in the allocation of purchase price, the analysis of real estate impairments, the valuation of contingent assets and liabilities, and the valuation of restricted stock shares issued to the Advisor or Property Manager. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Promoted Interest Distributions — The Company accounts for distributions to holders of promoted interests in a manner similar to noncontrolling interests. The Company identifies the distributions to holders of promoted interests separately within the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of equity. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company made distributions of approximately $2.0 million to a holder of promoted interest related to HarborChase of Villages Crossing, which has been recorded as a reduction to capital in excess of par value in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and redeemable noncontrolling interest.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest—The Company entered into a joint venture agreement with a third party and acquired a 95% membership interest. The Company’s joint venture partner acquired a 5% noncontrolling interest that includes a put option of its membership to the Company upon the occurrence of certain events that are not solely within the control of the Company and at price that is determinable upon exercising the option. The Company classifies redeemable equity securities in accordance with Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-04, “Liabilities (Topic 480): Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments,” which requires that redeemable equity securities be classified outside of permanent stockholders’ equity. Accordingly, the Company has classified these redeemable equity securities as redeemable noncontrolling interest within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and redeemable noncontrolling interest.
7
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements — In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date.” This update clarified the guidance in subtopic 405 and requires entities to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which total obligation is fixed at the reporting date. Entities are required to measure the obligation as the amount that the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors plus any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. Additionally, the guidance requires entities to disclose the nature and amount of the obligations as well as other information about those obligations. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted this ASU. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” This update clarified the guidance in subtopic 740 and requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward to the extent one is available. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted this ASU. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” This update changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations where only disposals representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results, such as a major line of business or geographical area, should be presented as a discontinued operation. This ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 with early adoption permitted. The Company has determined that the impact of this update will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” as a new Accounting Standard Concept (“ASC”) topic (Topic 606). The core principle of this amendment is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard further provides guidance for any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, lease contracts). This ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, with earlier adoption not permitted. ASU 2014-09 can be adopted using one of two retrospective application methods: 1) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or 2) as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the amendments of ASU 2014-09; however, these amendments could potentially have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other recently issued accounting pronouncements did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material effect on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
8
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
Real Estate Investment Properties — During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company acquired the following 16 properties, which were comprised of 13 senior housing communities, two medical office buildings (“MOB”), and one acute care hospital:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Location | | Structure | | Date Acquired | | Purchase Price | |
| | | | (in thousands) | |
| | | | |
Acute Care | | | | | | | | | | |
Houston Orthopedic & Spine Hospital | | Bellaire, TX
(“Houston”) | | Triple-net Lease | | 6/2/2014 | | $ | 49,000 | |
| | | | |
Medical Office | | | | | | | | | | |
Scripps Medical Office Building | | Chula Vista, CA
(“San Diego”) | | Modified Lease | | 1/21/2014 | | | 17,863 | (1) |
Foundation Medical Office Building | | Bellaire, TX
(“Houston”) | | Modified Lease | | 6/2/2014 | | | 27,000 | |
| | | | |
Senior Housing | | | | | | | | | | |
Pacific Northwest II Communities | | | | | | | | | | |
Prestige Senior Living Auburn Meadows | | Auburn, WA
(“Seattle”) | | Managed | | 2/3/2014 | | | 21,930 | |
Prestige Senior Living Bridgewood | | Vancouver, WA
(“Portland”) | | Managed | | 2/3/2014 | | | 22,096 | |
Prestige Senior Living Monticello Park | | Longview, WA | | Managed | | 2/3/2014 | | | 27,360 | |
Prestige Senior Living Rosemont | | Yelm, WA | | Managed | | 2/3/2014 | | | 16,877 | |
Prestige Senior Living West Hills | | Corvallis, OR | | Managed | | 3/3/2014 | | | 14,986 | |
| | | | |
South Bay II Communities | | | | | | | | | | |
Isle at Cedar Ridge | | Cedar Park, TX
(“Austin”) | | Managed | | 2/28/2014 | | | 21,630 | |
HarborChase of Plainfield | | Plainfield, IL | | Managed | | 3/28/2014 | | | 26,500 | |
Legacy Ranch Alzheimer’s Special Care Center | | Midland, TX | | Managed | | 3/28/2014 | | | 11,960 | |
The Springs Alzheimer’s Special Care Center | | San Angelo, TX | | Managed | | 3/28/2014 | | | 10,920 | |
Isle at Watercrest – Bryan | | Bryan, TX | | Managed | | 4/21/2014 | | | 22,050 | |
Watercrest at Bryan | | Bryan, TX | | Managed | | 4/21/2014 | | | 28,035 | |
Isle at Watercrest – Mansfield | | Mansfield, TX
(“Dallas/Fort Worth”) | | Managed | | 5/5/2014 | | | 25,000 | |
Watercrest at Mansfield | | Mansfield, TX
(“Dallas/Fort Worth”) | | Managed | | 6/30/2014 | | | 45,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 388,207 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTE:
(1) | This acquisition is not considered material to the Company and as such no pro forma financial information has been included related to this property. |
9
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
3. | Acquisitions (continued) |
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company acquired the following medical office building and six post-acute care facilities:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Medical Office | | | | | | | | | | |
LaPorte Cancer Center | | Westville, IN | | Modified Lease | | 6/14/2013 | | $ | 13,100 | |
| | | | |
Post-Acute Care | | | | | | | | | | |
Perennial Communities | | | | | | | | | | |
Batesville Healthcare Center | | Batesville, AR | | Triple-net Lease | | 5/31/2013 | | | 6,205 | |
Broadway Healthcare Center | | West Memphis, AR | | Triple-net Lease | | 5/31/2013 | | | 11,799 | |
Jonesboro Healthcare Center | | Jonesboro, AR | | Triple-net Lease | | 5/31/2013 | | | 15,232 | |
Magnolia Healthcare Center | | Magnolia, AR | | Triple-net Lease | | 5/31/2013 | | | 11,847 | |
Mine Creek Healthcare Center | | Nashville, AR | | Triple-net Lease | | 5/31/2013 | | | 3,374 | |
Searcy Healthcare Center | | Searcy, AR | | Triple-net Lease | | 5/31/2013 | | | 7,898 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 69,455 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
The following summarizes the purchase price allocation for the above properties, and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | | | June 30, 2013 | |
| | |
Land and land improvements | | $ | 32,280 | | | $ | 3,000 | |
Buildings and building improvements | | | 313,838 | | | | 59,694 | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | | 10,014 | | | | 3,549 | |
Intangibles(1) | | | 42,296 | | | | 3,212 | |
Other liabilities | | | (1,721 | ) | | | — | |
Assumed mortgage note payable | | | (27,286 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net assets acquired | | | 369,421 | | | | 69,455 | |
Contingent purchase price consideration(2) | | | (12,395 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total purchase price consideration | | $ | 357,026 | | | $ | 69,455 | |
| | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | At the acquisition date, the weighted-average amortization period on the acquired lease intangibles was approximately 4.0 years and 11.4 years, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The acquired lease intangibles during the six months ended June 30, 2014 were comprised of approximately $38.1 million and $4.2 million of in-place lease intangibles and other lease intangibles, respectively, and the acquired lease intangibles during the six months ended June 20, 2013 were comprised of approximately $3.2 million of in-place lease intangibles. |
(2) | Approximately $3.9 million of this amount has been paid during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 with the remaining $8.5 million included in other liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2014; refer to Note 9, “Contingent Purchase Price Consideration” for additional information. |
10
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
3. | Acquisitions (continued) |
The revenues and net loss (including deductions for acquisition fees and expenses and depreciation and amortization expense) attributable to the acquired properties included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations were approximately $12.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively, and $15.4 million and $12.0 million, respectively, for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and approximately $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013.
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the Company as if each of the properties were acquired as of January 1, 2013 and owned during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Unaudited) Quarter Ended June 30, | | | (Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Revenues | | $ | 46,564 | | | $ | 23,664 | | | $ | 90,327 | | | $ | 47,106 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss(1) | | $ | (8,930 | ) | | $ | (4,448 | ) | | $ | (19,291 | ) | | $ | (21,562 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss per share of common stock (basic and diluted) | | $ | (0.12 | ) | | $ | (0.10 | ) | | $ | (0.25 | ) | | $ | (0.53 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding (basic and diluted) (2) | | | 77,569 | | | | 44,912 | | | | 76,285 | | | | 40,858 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | The unaudited pro forma results for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, were adjusted to exclude approximately $4.3 million and $10.7 million, respectively, of acquisition related expenses directly attributable to the properties acquired during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014. The unaudited pro forma results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were adjusted to include the approximate $10.7 million of acquisition related expenses, as if the properties acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2014 had been acquired on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma results for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 were both adjusted to exclude approximately $1.8 million of acquisition related expenses directly attributable to the properties acquired during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. |
(2) | As a result of the acquired properties being treated as operational since January 1, 2013, the Company assumed approximately 12.4 million shares were issued as of January 1, 2013. Consequently the weighted average shares outstanding was adjusted to reflect this amount of shares being issued on January 1, 2013 instead of actual dates on which the shares were issued, and such shares were treated as outstanding as of the beginning of the period presented. |
11
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
3. | Acquisitions (continued) |
Real Estate Under Development— In February 2014, the Company acquired a tract of land in Tega Cay, South Carolina for $2.8 million (“Wellmore of Tega Cay”). In connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into a development agreement with a third party developer for the construction and development of a continuing care retirement community with a maximum development budget of approximately $35.6 million, including the allocated purchase price of the land.
In June 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with a third party and acquired a 95% membership interest in a tract of land in Katy, Texas for $4.0 million (“Watercrest at Katy”) on which the joint venture plans to construct and develop an independent living community with a maximum development budget of approximately $38.2 million, including the allocated purchase price of the land. The Company determined that Watercrest at Katy is a VIE because it believes there is insufficient equity at risk due to the development nature of the joint venture. The Company is the primary beneficiary and managing member while the joint venture partner or its affiliates manage the development, construction and certain day-to-day operations of the property subject to the Company’s oversight. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, distributions of operating cash flow will be distributed pro rata based on each member’s ownership interest until the members of the joint venture receive a specified minimum return on their invested capital, and thereafter, the respective co-venture partner will receive a disproportionately higher share of any remaining proceeds at varying levels based on the Company having received certain minimum threshold returns.
Under a promoted interest agreement with the respective developers, certain net operating income targets have been established which, upon meeting such targets, result in the developers being entitled to additional payments based on enumerated percentages of the assumed net proceeds of a deemed sale, subject to achievement of an established internal rate of return on the Company’s investment in the respective development. Refer to Note 7, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.
4. | Real Estate Assets, net |
The gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation of the Company’s real estate assets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
Land and land improvements | | $ | 93,527 | | | $ | 59,208 | |
Building and building improvements | | | 1,112,591 | | | | 783,260 | |
Tenant improvements | | | 39 | | | | — | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | | 33,190 | | | | 20,339 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (30,636 | ) | | | (14,016 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Real estate investment properties, net | | | 1,208,711 | | | | 848,791 | |
Real estate under development, including land | | | 16,674 | | | | 17,409 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total real estate assets, net | | $ | 1,225,385 | | | $ | 866,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense on the Company’s real estate investment properties, net was approximately $9.0 million and $16.6 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and approximately $2.1 million and $3.9 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
12
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
4. | Real Estate Assets, net (continued) |
In June 2014, the Company completed the construction and development of a senior housing community in Acworth, Georgia (“Dogwood Forest of Acworth”). Dogwood Forest of Acworth opened to residents beginning in July 2014 and was considered placed into service as of June 30, 2014. As such, the asset values related to Dogwood Forest of Acworth are included in real estate investment properties, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2014.
As of June 30, 2014, three of the Company’s senior housing communities have real estate under development with third-party developers as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | |
Property Name and Location) | | Developer | | Real Estate Development Costs Incurred (1) | | | Remaining Development Budget (2) | |
| | | |
Raider Ranch (Lubbock, TX) | | South Bay Partners, Ltd | | $ | 3,369 | | | $ | 12,978 | |
Wellmore of Tega Cay (Tega Cay, SC) | | Maxwell Group, Inc. | | | 8,365 | | | | 28,531 | |
Watercrest at Katy (Katy, TX) | | South Bay Partners, Ltd | | | 4,940 | | | | 34,184 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 16,674 | | | $ | 75,693 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | This amount represents land and total capitalized costs for GAAP purposes for the acquisition, development and construction of the senior housing community as of June 30, 2014. Amounts include investment services fees, asset management fees, interest expense and other costs capitalized during the development period. |
(2) | This amount includes preleasing and marketing costs which will be expensed as incurred. |
The development budgets of the senior housing developments include the cost of the land, construction costs, development fees, financing costs, start-up costs and initial operating deficits of the respective properties. An affiliate of the developer of the respective community coordinates and supervises the management and administration of the development and construction. Each developer is responsible for any cost overruns beyond the approved development budget for the applicable project pursuant to a cost overrun guarantee. Refer to Note 7, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.
13
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s intangible assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
In-place lease intangibles | | $ | 87,732 | | | $ | 49,642 | |
Above-market lease intangibles | | | 7,909 | | | | 3,704 | |
Below-market ground lease intangibles | | | 4,153 | | | | 4,153 | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | (15,419 | ) | | | (5,099 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Intangible assets, net | | $ | 84,375 | | | $ | 52,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Below-market lease intangibles | | $ | (4,337 | ) | | $ | (2,987 | ) |
Above-market ground lease intangibles | | | (317 | ) | | | (317 | ) |
Above-market mortgage note payable assumed | | | (371 | ) | | | — | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | 463 | | | | 168 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Intangible liabilities, net (1) | | $ | (4,562 | ) | | $ | (3,136 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Intangible liabilities, net are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
Amortization on the Company’s intangible assets was approximately $5.9 million and $10.3 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, of which approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, was treated as a reduction of rental income from operating leases, approximately $0.03 million and $0.1 million, respectively, was treated as an increase of property operating expenses and approximately $5.7 million and $9.8 million, respectively, was included in depreciation and amortization. Amortization on the Company’s intangible assets was approximately $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, which was all included in depreciation and amortization.
Amortization on the Company’s intangible liabilities was approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, of which approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were treated as an increase of rental income from operating leases and approximately two thousand and four thousand, respectively, was treated as a reduction of property operating expenses. There was no amortization on the Company’s intangible liabilities for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
The estimated future amortization on the Company’s intangibles for the remainder of 2014, each of the next four years and thereafter, in the aggregate, as of June 30, 2014 is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Liabilities | |
2014 | | $ | 13,291 | | | $ | (357 | ) |
2015 | | | 24,461 | | | | (660 | ) |
2016 | | | 15,129 | | | | (613 | ) |
2017 | | | 5,043 | | | | (563 | ) |
2018 | | | 4,511 | | | | (491 | ) |
Thereafter | | | 21,940 | | | | (1,878 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 84,375 | | | $ | (4,562 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2014, the weighted average useful life of in-place leases was 3.2 years.
14
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
As of June 30, 2014, the Company owned 36 properties that were leased to tenants on a triple-net, net or modified gross basis, and accounted for as operating leases; of which, 20 are single-tenant properties that are 100% leased under operating leases and the remaining 16 are multi-tenant properties that are leased under operating leases. The Company’s leases had a weighted average remaining lease term of 7.3 years based on annualized base rents expiring between 2014 and 2030, subject to the tenants’ options to extend the lease periods ranging from two to ten years.
Under the terms of the Company’s triple-net lease agreements, each tenant is responsible for the payment of property taxes, general liability insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, including structural and roof maintenance expenses. Each tenant is expected to pay real estate taxes directly to taxing authorities. However, if the tenant does not pay, the Company will be liable. The total annualized property tax assessed on these properties is approximately $1.9 million.
Under the terms of the multi-tenant lease agreements that have third-party property managers, each tenant is responsible for the payment of their proportionate share of property taxes, general liability insurance, utilities, repairs and common area maintenance. These amounts are billed monthly and recorded as tenant reimbursement income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The following are future minimum lease payments to be received under non-cancellable operating leases for the remainder of 2014, each of the next four years and thereafter, as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands):
| | | | |
2014 | | $ | 21,335 | |
2015 | | | 41,579 | |
2016 | | | 39,560 | |
2017 | | | 38,776 | |
2018 | | | 38,203 | |
Thereafter | | | 155,174 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 334,627 | |
| | | | |
The above future minimum lease payments to be received excludes tenant reimbursements, straight-line rent adjustments, amortization of above- and below-market lease intangibles and base rent attributable to any renewal options exercised by the tenants in the future.
15
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
7. | Variable Interest Entities |
Consolidated VIEs — As of June 30, 2014, the Company has 11 wholly-owned subsidiaries, which are VIEs due to following factors and circumstances:
| (1) | Three of these subsidiaries are single property entities, designed to own and lease their respective properties to single tenants, for which buy-out options are held by the respective tenants that are formula based. |
| (2) | Three of these subsidiaries are single property entities, designed to own and lease their respective properties to multiple tenants, which are subject to either a ground lease or an air rights lease that include buy-out and put options held by either the tenant or landlord under the applicable lease. |
| (3) | Four of these subsidiaries are entities with real estate under development or completed developments in which the third-party developers have an opportunity to earn promoted interest payments after certain net operating income targets and internal rate of return targets have been met. |
| (4) | One of these subsidiaries is a joint venture with real estate under development in which the third-party developer has an opportunity to earn promoted interest payments after certain net operating income targets and internal rate of return targets have been met. |
The Company determined it is the primary beneficiary and holds a controlling financial interest in each of the aforementioned property and development entities due to its power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entities, as well as its obligation to absorb the losses and its right to receive benefits from these entities that could potentially be significant to these entities. As such, the transactions and accounts of these VIEs are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
The aggregate carrying amount and major classifications of the consolidated assets that can be used to settle obligations of the VIEs and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs that are non-recourse to the Company as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Real estate investment properties, net | | $ | 89,936 | | | $ | 72,053 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Real estate under development, including land | | $ | 15,734 | | | $ | 16,210 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Intangibles, net | | $ | 4,139 | | | $ | 4,535 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 576 | | | $ | 727 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loan costs, net | | $ | 1,133 | | | $ | 912 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other | | $ | 1,029 | | | $ | 382 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Mortgages and other notes payable | | $ | 62,757 | | | $ | 52,596 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | $ | 1,410 | | | $ | 939 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 373 | | | $ | 309 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Due to related parties | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 112 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accrued development costs | | $ | 3,060 | | | $ | 7,047 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these VIEs is limited to its net investment in these entities which totaled approximately $44.9 million as of June 30, 2014. The Company’s exposure is limited because of the non-recourse nature of the borrowings of the VIEs.
Unconsolidated VIEs — The Company determined that the borrowing entity under its note receivable from a related party represents a VIE due to the transaction structure; however, the borrower was determined to be the primary beneficiary. Refer to Note 11, “Related Party Arrangements” for additional information.
16
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
8. | Unconsolidated Entities |
The following presents financial information for each of the Company’s unconsolidated entities as of and for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 | |
| | Montecito | | | CHTSunIV (2) | | | Windsor Manor | | | Total | |
Revenues | | $ | 537 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,418 | | | $ | 2,955 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | $ | 151 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 160 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 50 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (647 | ) | | $ | (597 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income allocable to other venture partners(1) | | $ | 5 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 754 | | | $ | 759 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) allocable to the Company(1) | | $ | 45 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,401 | ) | | $ | (1,356 | ) |
Amortization of capitalized acquisition costs | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities | | $ | 43 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,405 | ) | | $ | (1,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Distributions declared to the Company | | $ | 174 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,493 | (3) | | $ | 2,667 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions received by the Company | | $ | 172 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 285 | | | $ | 457 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | For the six months ended June 30, 2014 | |
| | Montecito | | | CHTSunIV (2) | | | Windsor Manor | | | Total | |
Revenues | | $ | 1,028 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,267 | | | $ | 5,295 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | $ | 330 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 427 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 128 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (742 | ) | | $ | (614 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income allocable to other venture partners(1) | | $ | 13 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 374 | | | $ | 387 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) allocable to the Company(1) | | $ | 115 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,116 | ) | | $ | (1,001 | ) |
Amortization of capitalized acquisition costs | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (8 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities | | $ | 111 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,124 | ) | | $ | (1,013 | ) |
| | | | |
Distributions declared to the Company | | $ | 346 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,777 | (3) | | $ | 3,123 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions received by the Company | | $ | 343 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 664 | | | $ | 1,007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Income (loss) is allocated between the Company and its joint venture partner using the HLBV method of accounting. |
(2) | In July 2013, the Company completed the sale of its joint venture membership interest in CHTSunIV. |
(3) | The distributions declared to the Company for the Windsor Manor joint venture during both the quarter and six months ended include approximately $2.2 million of capital proceeds from a debt refinancing; refer to “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” for additional information. |
17
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
8. | Unconsolidated Entities (continued) |
The following presents financial information for each of the Company’s unconsolidated entities as of and for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 | |
| | Montecito (2) | | | CHTSunIV | | | Windsor Manor (2) | | | Total | |
Revenues | | $ | 453 | | | $ | 12,183 | | | $ | 2,060 | | | $ | 14,696 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | $ | 158 | (3) | | $ | 2,030 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 2,274 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | (319 | ) | | $ | 115 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) allocable to other venture partners(1) | | $ | 5 | | | $ | (507 | ) | | $ | (588 | ) | | $ | (1,090 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income allocable to the Company(1) | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 887 | | | $ | 269 | | | $ | 1,205 | |
Amortization of capitalized acquisition costs | | | (2 | ) | | | (18 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | (23 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 869 | | | $ | 266 | | | $ | 1,182 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Distributions declared to the Company | | $ | 342 | | | $ | 1,508 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 1,855 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions received by the Company | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,487 | | | $ | 175 | | | $ | 1,662 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | For the six months ended June 30, 2013 | |
| | Montecito(2) | | | CHTSunIV | | | Windsor Manor (2) | | | Total | |
Revenues | | $ | 809 | | | $ | 24,107 | | | $ | 3,283 | | | $ | 28,199 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | (55 | )(3) | | $ | 3,603 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 3,554 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (239 | ) | | $ | (46 | ) | | $ | (492 | ) | | $ | (777 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss allocable to other venture partners(1) | | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | (1,365 | ) | | $ | (894 | ) | | $ | (2,283 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) allocable to the Company (1) | | $ | (215 | ) | | $ | 1,319 | | | $ | 402 | | | $ | 1,506 | |
Amortization of capitalized acquisition costs | | | (4 | ) | | | (36 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (46 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities | | $ | (219 | ) | | $ | 1,283 | | | $ | 396 | | | $ | 1,460 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Distributions declared to the Company | | $ | 342 | | | $ | 2,990 | | | $ | 180 | | | $ | 3,512 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions received by the Company | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,955 | | | $ | 224 | | | $ | 3,179 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Income (loss) is allocated between the Company and its joint venture partner using the HLBV method of accounting. |
(2) | Represents operating results from the date of acquisition through the end of the periods presented. |
(3) | Includes approximately $0.1 million and $0.5 million of non-recurring acquisition expenses incurred by the joint venture for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. |
18
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
9. | Contingent Purchase Price Consideration |
Capital Health Communities
As of June 30, 2014, the Company determined the fair value of the Yield Guaranty to be $3.4 million, which was recorded as other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The following table provides a roll-forward of the fair value of the contingent purchase price consideration related to the Yield Guaranty on the Capital Health Communities for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 2,188 | | | $ | 2,664 | | | $ | 4,488 | | | $ | 2,664 | |
Yield Guaranty payment received from seller | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,300 | ) | | | — | |
Change in fair value | | | 1,321 | | | | — | | | | 1,321 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 3,509 | | | $ | 2,664 | | | $ | 3,509 | | | $ | 2,664 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
South Bay II Communities
In conjunction with the acquisition of the South Bay II Communities, the Company entered into an agreement with the sellers whereby the purchase price is adjusted in the event that certain net operating income targets are met. The additional consideration will be determined within three months of the acquisition date and be equal to (a) the baseline net operating income divided by the baseline capitalization rates (as defined in the purchase and sale agreement) less (b) the purchase price paid at closing. The following table provides a roll-forward of the fair value of the estimated contingent purchase price consideration related to the South Bay II Communities for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Beginning balance | | $ | (2,570 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Contingent consideration in connection with acquisition | | | (9,825 | ) | | | — | | | | (12,395 | ) | | | — | |
Contingent consideration payment | | | 3,895 | | | | — | | | | 3,895 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | (8,500 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (8,500 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of the contingent purchase price consideration was based on a then-current income approach that is primarily determined based on the present value and probability of future cash flows using internal underwriting models. The income approach further includes estimates of risk-adjusted rate of return and capitalization rates for each property. Since this methodology includes inputs that are less observable by the public and are not necessarily reflected in active markets, the measurements of the estimated fair value related to the Company’s contingent purchase price consideration are categorized as Level 3 on the three-level fair value hierarchy.
19
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
The following table provides details of the Company’s indebtedness as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
Mortgages payable and other notes payable: | | | | | | | | |
Fixed rate debt | | $ | 377,591 | | | $ | 290,817 | |
Variable rate debt (1) | | | 221,833 | | | | 147,290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total mortgages and other notes payable | | | 599,424 | | | | 438,107 | |
Revolving Credit Facility | | | 210,615 | | | | 98,500 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total borrowings | | $ | 810,039 | | | $ | 536,607 | |
| | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTE:
(1) | As of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, approximately $124.3 million has been swapped to fixed rates with notional amounts that begin to settle in 2015 and continue through the maturity date of the respective loan (ranging from 2016 through 2018). |
Maturities of indebtedness for the remainder of 2014 and each of the next four years and thereafter, in the aggregate, as of June 30, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
2014 | | $ | 19,973 | |
2015 | | | 12,588 | |
2016 | | | 286,343 | |
2017 | | | 28,262 | |
2018 | | | 273,531 | |
Thereafter | | | 189,342 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 810,039 | |
| | | | |
The Company financed a portion of the acquisitions described in Note 3, “Acquisitions,” through additional borrowings and loan assumptions. The following table provides details as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | |
Property and Related Loan Type | | Interest Rate at June 30, 2014 (1) | | Payment Terms | | Maturity Date(2) | | June 30, 2014 | |
| | | | |
Pacific Northwest II Communities; Mortgage Loan | | 4.30% per annum | | Monthly principal and interest payments based on a 30-year amortization schedule | | 12/5/2018 | | $ | 62,668 | |
| | | | |
Isle at Watercrest – Mansfield; Mortgage Loan | | 4.68% per annum | | Monthly principal and interest payments based on a total payment of $143,330 | | 6/1/2023 | | | 27,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total fixed rate debt | | | | | 89,917 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
CHP Partners, LP and CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc; Unsecured Bridge Loan | | LIBOR plus 8.00% per annum | | Monthly interest payments with principal due at maturity | | 8/18/2014 | | | 15,000 | |
| | | | |
Houston Orthopedic & Spine Hospital and Foundation MOB; Mortgage Loan | | LIBOR plus 2.85% per annum | | Monthly principal and interest payments based on a 30-year amortization schedule | | 6/1/2019 | | | 49,777 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total variable rate debt | | | | $ | 64,777 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total mortgages and other notes payable | | | | $ | 154,694 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
20
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
10. | Indebtedness (continued) |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | The 30-day LIBOR was approximately 0.2% as June 30, 2014. |
(2) | Represents the initial maturity date (or, as applicable, the maturity date as extended). The maturity date may be extended beyond the date shown subject to certain lender conditions. |
In February 2014, through its limited partnership, the Company modified the terms of its Revolving Credit Facility and exercised its option to increase the aggregate maximum principal amount available for borrowing from $120 million to $240 million. In April, the Company increased the aggregate maximum principal amount available to $275 million. The Company had approximately $112.1 million of additional borrowings on its Revolving Credit Facility during the six months ended June 30, 2014 that were used to finance acquisitions (primarily the South Bay II Communities). As of June 30, 2014, the Revolving Credit Facility is collateralized by 16 properties with an aggregate net book carrying value of approximately $324.6 million and the total availability was approximately $212.9 million. The Revolving Credit Facility has sizing requirements that govern the total amount that the Company may borrow at any given time based on the purchase price of the collateral and a metric of debt service coverage.
The Company’s Revolving Credit Facility contains affirmative, negative, and financial covenants which are customary for loans of this type, including without limitation: (i) limitations on incurrence of additional indebtedness; (ii) restrictions on payments of cash distributions except if required by REIT requirements; (iii) minimum occupancy levels for collateralized properties; (iv) minimum loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios with respect to collateralized properties; (v) maximum leverage, secured recourse debt, and unimproved land/development property ratios; (vi) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum consolidated net worth, unencumbered liquidity, and equity raise requirements; (vii) limitations on certain types of investments and additional indebtedness; and (viii) minimum liquidity. The limitations on distributions includes a limitation on the extent of allowable distributions, which are not to exceed the greater of 95% of adjusted FFO (as defined per the loan agreement) or the minimum amount of distributions required to maintain the Company’s REIT status. As of June 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all affirmative, negative and financial covenants.
All of the Company’s mortgage and construction loans contain customary financial covenants and ratios; including (but not limited to) the following: debt service coverage ratio, minimum occupancy levels, limitations on incurrence of additional indebtedness, etc. As of June 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants and ratios.
The fair market value and carrying value of the mortgage and other notes payable was approximately $583.2 million and $599.4 million, respectively, and both the fair market value and carrying value of the Revolving Credit Facility was $210.6 million as of June 30, 2014. The fair market value and carrying value of the mortgage and other notes payable was approximately $431.4 million and $438.1 million, respectively, and both the fair market value and carrying value of the Revolving Credit Facility was $98.5 million as of December 31, 2013. These fair market values are based on current rates and spreads the Company would expect to obtain for similar borrowings. Since this methodology includes inputs that are less observable by the public and are not necessarily reflected in active markets, the measurement of the estimated fair values related to the Company’s mortgage notes payable is categorized as level 3 on the three-level valuation hierarchy. The estimated fair value of accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates the carrying value as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 because of the relatively short maturities of the obligations.
21
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Related Party Arrangements |
The Company incurs operating expenses which, in general, relate to administration of the Company on an ongoing basis. Pursuant to the advisory agreement, the Advisor shall reimburse the Company the amount by which the total operating expenses paid or incurred by the Company exceed, in any four consecutive fiscal quarters (an “Expense Year”) commencing with the Expense Year ending June 30, 2013, the greater of 2% of average invested assets or 25% of net income (as defined in the advisory agreement) (the “Limitation”), unless a majority of the Company’s independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors (the “Expense Cap Test”). In performing the Expense Cap Test, the Company uses operating expenses on a GAAP basis after making adjustments for the benefit of expense support under the Expense Support Agreements. For the Expense Year ended June 30, 2014, the Company did not incur operating expenses in excess of the Limitation.
The Company maintains accounts totaling approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, at a bank in which the Company’s chairman serves as a director.
In March 2013, the Company entered into the Advisor Expense Support Agreement, whereby commencing on April 1, 2013, the Advisor has agreed to provide expense support to the Company through forgoing the payment of fees in cash and acceptance of restricted stock for services rendered and specified expenses incurred in an amount equal to the positive excess, if any, of (a) aggregate stockholder cash distributions declared for the applicable quarter, over (b) the Company’s aggregate modified funds from operations (as defined in the Advisor Expense Support Agreement). The Advisor expense support amount is determined for each calendar quarter of the Company, on a non-cumulative basis, each quarter-end date (“Determination Date”). In August 2013, the Company entered into the Property Manager Expense Support Agreement, whereby commencing on July 1, 2013, the Property Manager agreed to provide expense support to the Company through forgoing the payment of fees in cash and accepting restricted stock for services in an amount equal to the positive excess, if any, of (a) aggregate stockholder cash distributions declared for the applicable quarter, over (b) the Company’s aggregate modified funds from operations (as defined in the Property Manager Expense Support Agreement). The Property Manager expense support amount shall be determined, on a non-cumulative basis, after the calculation of the Advisor expense support amount pursuant to the Property Manager Expense Support Agreement on each Determination Date. The terms of both the Advisor Expense Support Agreement and the Property Manager Expense Support Agreement (‘the Expense Support Agreements”) run through December 31, 2014, subject to the right of the Advisor or Property Manager to terminate their respective agreements upon 30 days’ written notice to the Company. Since the vesting criteria is outside the control of the Advisor and Property Manager and involves both market conditions and counterparty performance conditions, the restricted stock shares will be treated as unissued for financial reporting purposes until the vesting criteria, as defined in the Expense Support Agreements, are met.
In exchange for services rendered and in consideration of the expense support provided, the Company will issue, within 45 days following each Determination Date, a number of shares of restricted stock equal to the quotient of the expense support amount provided by to the Advisor and Property Manager for the preceding quarter divided by the then-current public offering price per share of common stock, on the terms and conditions and subject to the restrictions set forth in the respective expense support agreements (“Expense Support Agreements”). Any amounts foregone, and for which restricted stock shares are issued, pursuant to the Expense Support Agreements will be permanently waived and the Company will have no obligation to pay such amounts to the Advisor or the Property Manager. The Restricted Stock is subordinated and forfeited to the extent that stockholders do not receive their original invested capital back with at least a 6% annualized return of investment upon ultimate liquidity of the Company.
22
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Related Party Arrangements (continued) |
The fees incurred by and reimbursable to the Advisor in connection with the Company’s Offering for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and related amounts unpaid as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Six months ended | | | Unpaid amounts as of(1) | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | | | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Selling commissions(2) | | $ | 3,143 | | | $ | 2,221 | | | $ | 5,596 | | | $ | 3,917 | | | $ | 424 | | | $ | 71 | |
Marketing support fees(2) | | | 2,829 | | | | 3,040 | | | | 5,413 | | | | 5,211 | | | | 338 | | | | 70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,972 | | | $ | 5,261 | | | $ | 11,009 | | | $ | 9,128 | | | $ | 762 | | | $ | 141 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The expenses and fees incurred by and reimbursable to the Company’s related parties for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and related amounts unpaid as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Six months ended | | | Unpaid amounts as of (1) | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | | | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Reimbursable expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Offering costs (2) | | $ | 1,541 | | | $ | 1,244 | | | $ | 2,367 | | | $ | 2,022 | | | $ | 413 | | | $ | 612 | |
Operating expenses (3) | | | 743 | | | | 604 | | | | 942 | | | | 1,109 | | | | 1,040 | | | | 915 | |
Acquisition fees and expenses | | | 98 | | | | 140 | | | | 333 | | | | 239 | | | | 7 | | | | 138 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,382 | | | | 1,988 | | | | 3,642 | | | | 3,370 | | | | 1,460 | | | | 1,665 | |
Investment services fees(4) | | | 4,178 | | | | 1,546 | | | | 8,224 | | | | 1,866 | | | | 1,427 | | | | — | |
Financing coordination fees (5) | | | 220 | | | | — | | | | 220 | | | | — | | | | 220 | | | | — | |
Property management fees(6) | | | 575 | | | | 321 | | | | 1,035 | | | | 584 | | | | 193 | | | | 322 | |
Asset management fees (7) | | | 3,148 | | | | 633 | | | | 5,814 | | | | 1,634 | | | | 122 | | | | 894 | |
Interest reserve and other advances (8) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 236 | | | | 286 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 10,503 | | | $ | 4,488 | | | $ | 18,935 | | | $ | 7,454 | | | $ | 3,658 | | | $ | 3,167 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Amounts are recorded as due to related parties in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
(2) | Amounts are recorded as stock issuance and offering costs in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and redeemable noncontrolling interest. |
(3) | Amounts are recorded as general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
(4) | For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company incurred approximately $4.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, in investment services fees of which approximately $0.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, was capitalized and included in real estate under development in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred approximately $1.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively, in investment service fees, of which approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, was capitalized as part of its investment in the Montecito Joint Venture and the additional Windsor Manor II Communities, and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. Investment service fees, that are not capitalized, are recorded as acquisition fees and expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
23
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Related Party Arrangements (continued) |
(5) | For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company incurred approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in financing coordination fees of which $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, have been capitalized and included in its investment in the Windsor Manor Joint Venture. There were no financing coordination fees for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. |
(6) | For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in property and construction management fees payable to the Property Manager of which approximately $0.09 million and $0.1 million, respectively, in construction management fees were capitalized and included in real estate under development in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in property and construction management fees payable to the Property Manager of which $0.06 million and $0.08 million, respectively, have been capitalized and included in real estate under development. |
(7) | For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company incurred approximately $3.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively, in asset management fees payable to the Advisor of which approximately $2.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, were forgone in accordance with the terms of the Advisor Expense Support Agreement and approximately $0.07 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were capitalized and included in real estate under development in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred approximately $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in asset management fees payable to the Advisor of which approximately $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, were forgone in accordance with the terms of the Expense Support Agreement and approximately $0.04 million and $0.05 million, respectively, were capitalized and included in real estate under development in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
(8) | Amounts primarily consists of an interest reserve account related to the acquisition, development and construction loan (“ADC Loan”) that the Company originated in June 2013; refer below for additional information. |
The following fees were foregone in connection with the Expense Support Agreements for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and cumulatively as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands, except offering price):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Six months ended | | | As of | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | |
Asset management fees (1) | | $ | 2,033 | | | $ | 474 | | | $ | 2,880 | | | $ | 474 | | | $ | 4,281 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Then-current offering price | | $ | 10.14 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | $ | 10.14 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | $ | 10.14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted stock shares(2) | | | 200 | | | | 47 | | | | 284 | | | | 47 | | | | 422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Cash distributions on Restricted Stock(3) | | $ | 14 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 23 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock distributions on Restricted Stock(4) | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | No other amounts have been forgone in connection with the Expense Support Agreements for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and cumulatively as of June 30, 2014. |
(2) | Restricted stock shares are comprised of approximately 0.2 million issued to the Advisor and approximately 0.2 million issuable to the Advisor as of June 30, 2014. Since the vesting conditions were not met through June 30, 2014, no fair value was assigned to the restricted stock shares as the shares were valued at zero, which represents the lowest possible value estimated at vesting. In addition, the restricted stock shares were treated as unissued for financial reporting purposes because the vesting criteria had not been met through June 30, 2014. |
(3) | The cash distributions have been recognized as compensation expense as issued and included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
(4) | The par value of the stock distributions has been recognized as compensation expense as issued and included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
24
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Related Party Arrangements (continued) |
As of June 30, 2014, the Company has funded approximately $5.7 million of the acquisition, development and construction loan (“ADC Loan”) to C4 Development, LLC (“Crosland Southeast”), a related party, for the development of an MOB in Rutland, Virginia.
Based on review and assessment of the transaction structure, the Company has determined that it holds a variable interest in Crosland Southeast through the ADC Loan; however, the Company further concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the HCA Rutland development as the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance of either Crosland Southeast or the HCA Rutland development. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with this VIE is limited to the amounts funded under the ADC Loan, which totaled approximately $5.7 million as of June 30, 2014. The Company’s exposure is limited as a result of the Company’s collateralized interest in the HCA Rutland development.
The funding on the ADC Loan has been recorded as a note receivable from related party in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and is comprised of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Loan Principal Balance as of | |
Borrower (Description of Collateral Property) | | Origination Date | | | Maturity Date(1) | | Interest Rate(2) | | | June 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
Crosland Southeast (land development) | | | 6/27/2013 | | | 12/27/2014 | | | 16.00 | % | | $ | 5,705 | | | $ | 3,741 | |
Loan origination costs, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | 84 | |
Accrued interest(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | 341 | | | | 124 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total note receivable from related party | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 6,046 | | | $ | 3,949 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | The initial term of the ADC Loan was one year; however, in June 2014, the borrower exercised an extension option for an additional six months. |
(2) | The interest rate is comprised of an 8% component that is paid monthly and an 8% component that is paid upon maturity of the ADC Loan. |
(3) | Approximately $0.04 million and $0.02 million, respectively, of accrued interest represents monthly interest payments and approximately $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, represents amounts that are due at maturity. Accrued interest is included in interest income on note receivable from related party in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
The fair value and carrying value of the Company’s note receivable from related party was approximately $6.0 million as of June 30, 2014 based on then-current rates and spreads that a market participant would expect to obtain for similar financings. Since this methodology includes inputs that are less observable by the public and are not necessarily reflected in active markets, the measurement of the estimated fair value related to the Company’s note receivable from related party is categorized as level 3 on the three-level fair value hierarchy.
The following is a schedule of future principal maturities for the note receivable from related party for the remainder of 2014, each of the next four years and thereafter, in the aggregate, as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands):
| | | | |
2014 | | $ | 6,046 | |
2015 | | | — | |
2016 | | | — | |
2017 | | | — | |
2018 | | | — | |
Thereafter | | | — | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 6,046 | |
| | | | |
25
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
12. | Derivative Financial Instruments |
The following table summarizes the terms of the derivative financial instruments held by the Company or through its joint ventures and the asset (liability) that has been recorded (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value asset (liability) as of | |
Notional amount | | | Strike (1) | | | Credit Spread (1) | | | Trade date | | Maturity date | | June 30, 2014 | | | December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 12,421 | (2) | | | 1.3 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | 1/17/2013 | | 1/15/2018 | | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | 83 | |
$ | 38,255 | (3) | | | 2.7 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | 9/6/2013 | | 7/10/2018 | | $ | (1,067 | ) | | $ | (590 | ) |
$ | 26,067 | (3) | | | 2.8 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | 9/6/2013 | | 8/29/2018 | | $ | (784 | ) | | $ | (435 | ) |
$ | 30,000 | (3) | | | 0.9 | % | | | 2.7 | % | | 10/22/2013 | | 8/19/2016 | | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | (10 | ) |
$ | 29,952 | (3) | | | 1.1 | % | | | 4.3 | % | | 11/13/2013 | | 5/31/2016 | | $ | (61 | ) | | $ | (8 | ) |
$ | 11,000 | (4) | | | 3.0 | % | | | — | % | | 6/27/2014 | | 6/30/2017 | | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | — | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | The all-in rates for each derivative financial instrument are equal to the sum of the Strike and Credit Spread detailed above. |
(2) | Amounts related to the swap held by the Montecito Joint Venture for which the proportionate amounts of fair value relative to the Company’s ownership percentage are included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
(3) | Amounts are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
(4) | Amounts related to the interest rate cap held by the Windsor Manor Joint Venture for which the proportionate amounts of fair value relative to the Company’s ownership percentage are included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative financial instruments fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. The Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative financial instruments and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative financial instruments. As a result, the Company determined that its derivative financial instruments valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Determining fair value requires management to make certain estimates and judgments. Changes in assumptions could have a positive or negative impact on the estimated fair values of such instruments which could, in turn, impact the Company‘s or its joint venture’s results of operations.
26
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest:
In connection with the Watercrest at Katy joint venture described in Note 3, “Acquisitions,” the Company’s joint venture partner acquired a 5% noncontrolling interest that includes a put option of its membership to the Company at any time commencing on the date on which Watercrest at Katy development opens to residents and concluding on the fifth anniversary thereof, when net operating income (“NOI”) is: (a) equal to or greater than the NOI threshold established in the joint venture agreement, and (b) has been equal to or greater than the NOI threshold established in the joint venture agreement for the three calendar months immediately preceding the calendar month during which the joint venture partner exercises the put option. The put option is redeemable for cash at a price equal to the appraised market value (less certain transaction-related costs) at the time the put option is exercised (“Put Price”). The Company’s maximum exposure, as a result of these redeemable equity securities, is limited to the Put Price multiplied by the joint venture partner’s 5% membership interest.
Stockholders’ Equity:
Public Offering — As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had received aggregate offering proceeds of approximately $758.0 million (75.7 million shares) and $568.9 million (57.0 million shares), respectively, including approximately $16.6 million (1.7 million shares) and $9.4 million (1.0 million shares), respectively, received through its Reinvestment Plan.
Distributions — During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company declared cash distributions of approximately $13.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively. In addition, the Company declared and made stock distributions of 1.0 million shares and 0.4 million shares of common stock, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, which are reflected for the purposes of earnings per share as being outstanding since the beginning of the earliest period presented.
For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, 25.4% of distributions were considered taxable for federal income tax purposes and 74.6% were considered a return of capital. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, 100% of distributions were considered a return of capital. No amounts distributed to stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were required to be or have been treated by the Company as a return of capital for purposes of calculating the stockholders’ return on their invested capital as described in the Company’s advisory agreement. The distribution of new common shares to recipients is non-taxable.
Refer to Note 11, “Related Party Arrangements,” for information on distributions paid to the Advisor in connection with restricted stock shares received under the Advisor Expense Support Agreement.
Redemptions — During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company received requests for the redemption of common stock of an aggregate of 0.1 million shares and 0.05 million shares, respectively, all of which were approved for redemption at an average price of $9.13 and $9.16, respectively, and for a total of approximately $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
27
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
Other comprehensive loss — The following table reflects the effect of derivative financial instruments held by Company, or its equity method investments, and included in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Financial Instrument | | Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive loss on derivative financial instrument (Effective Portion) | | | Location of gain (loss) reclassified into earnings (Effective Portion) | | Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings (Effective Portion) | |
| | Quarter ended June 30, | | | | | Quarter ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | (723 | ) | | | — | | | Not applicable | | $ | — | | | | — | |
Interest rate cap held by unconsolidated joint venture | | | (9 | ) | | | — | | | Not applicable | | | — | | | | — | |
Interest rate swap held by unconsolidated joint venture | | | (89 | ) | | | 211 | | | Not applicable | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (821 | ) | | $ | 211 | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Financial Instrument | | Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive loss on derivative financial instrument (Effective Portion) | | | Location of gain (loss) reclassified into earnings (Effective Portion) | | Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings (Effective Portion) | |
| | Six Months ended June 30, | | | | | Six Months ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | (946 | ) | | | — | | | Not applicable | | $ | — | | | | — | |
Interest rate cap held by unconsolidated joint venture | | | (9 | ) | | | — | | | Not applicable | | | — | | | | — | |
Interest rate swap held by unconsolidated joint venture | | | (115 | ) | | | 131 | | | Not applicable | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (1,070 | ) | | $ | 131 | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
28
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
The components of the income tax benefit (expense) for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Current: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 13 | |
State | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | 28 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current benefit (expense) | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | 28 | | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | — | | | | (25 | ) | | | — | | | | (25 | ) |
State | | | — | | | | (6 | ) | | | — | | | | (6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total deferred expense | | | — | | | | (31 | ) | | | — | | | | (31 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (31 | ) | | $ | 28 | | | $ | (18 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2014 are as follows:
| | | | |
Carryforwards of net operating loss | | $ | 1,233 | |
Prepaid rent | | | 434 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (1,667 | ) |
| | | | |
Net deferred tax assets | | $ | — | |
| | | | |
A reconciliation of the income tax benefit (expense) computed at the statutory federal tax rate on income before income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Tax expense computed at federal statutory rate | | $ | (4,305 | ) | | | (35.00 | %) | | $ | (980 | ) | | | (35.00 | %) |
Benefit of REIT election | | | 4,305 | | | | 35.00 | % | | | 955 | | | | 34.11 | % |
State income tax benefit | | | (2 | ) | | | (0.02 | %) | | | (6 | ) | | | (0.09 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | $ | (2 | ) | | | (0.02 | %) | | $ | (31 | ) | | | (0.98 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Tax expense computed at federal statutory rate | | $ | (8,699 | ) | | | (35.00 | %) | | $ | (2,324 | ) | | | (35.00 | %) |
Benefit of REIT election | | | 8,699 | | | | 35.00 | % | | | 2,312 | | | | 34.82 | % |
State income tax benefit | | | 28 | | | | 0.11 | % | | | (6 | ) | | | (0.09 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | $ | 28 | | | | 0.11 | % | | $ | (18 | ) | | | (0.27 | % ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The tax years 2010 through 2013 remain subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the United States. The Company analyzed its material tax positions and determined that it has not taken any uncertain tax positions.
29
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED)
15. | Commitments and Contingencies |
From time to time, the Company may be exposed to litigation arising from operations of its business in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any litigation that it believes will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Refer to Note 4, “Real Estate Assets, net,” for additional information on the remaining development budgets for the Company’s senior housing developments.
In May 2014, the Company entered into two separate purchase agreements to acquire a portfolio of five acute care and post-acute care hospitals for a total purchase price of approximately $131.1 million. The Company escrowed an earnest money deposit of $6.0 million as of June 30, 2014 and which as of the date of this filing is non-refundable. The acquisition is subject to certain contingencies, including completion of due diligence, licensing and obtaining financing satisfactory to the Company. There can be no assurance that any or all contingencies will be satisfied and that the transaction will ultimately be completed, which in either event the deposit would be applied toward the purchase price or forfeited.
Equity transactions
The Company’s board of directors declared a monthly cash distribution of $0.0338 and a monthly stock distribution of 0.0025 shares on each outstanding share of common stock on July 1, 2014 and August 1, 2014. These distributions are to be paid and distributed by September 30, 2014.
During the period July 1, 2014 through August 4, 2014, the Company received additional subscription proceeds of approximately $45.6 million (4.5 million shares).
30
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Introduction
The following discussion is based on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Amounts as of December 31, 2013, included in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date. This information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and the notes thereto, as well as the audited consolidated financial statements, notes and management’s discussion and analysis included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements under “Management���s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical or current fact may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor created by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, but reflect management’s current understandings, intentions, beliefs, plans, expectations, assumptions and/or predictions regarding the future of the Company’s business and its performance, the economy, and other future conditions and forecasts of future events, and circumstances. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “plans,” “continues,” “pro forma,” “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “should” and “could,” and words and terms of similar substance in connection with discussions of future operating or financial performance, business strategy and portfolios, projected growth prospects, cash flows, costs and financing needs, legal proceedings, amount and timing of anticipated future distributions, estimated per share net asset value of the Company’s common stock, and/or other matters. The Company’s forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. While the Company’s management believes its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. As with any projection or forecast, forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data and/or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise, and may not be realized. The Company’s forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s ability to control or accurately predict. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, the Company’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Given these uncertainties, the Company cautions you not to place undue reliance on such statements.
Important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to vary materially from those expressed or implied in its forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, government regulation, economic, strategic, political and social conditions, and the following: risks associated with the Company’s investment strategy; a worsening economic environment in the U.S. or globally, including financial market fluctuations; risks associated with real estate markets, including declining real estate values; the availability of proceeds from the Company’s offering of its shares; risks of doing business internationally, including currency risks; the Company’s failure to obtain, renew or extend necessary financing or to access the debt or equity markets; the use of debt to finance the Company’s business activities, including refinancing and risk of rising interest rates and the Company’s failure to comply with debt covenants; the Company’s inability to identify and close on suitable investments; failure to successfully manage growth or integrate acquired properties and operations; the Company’s inability to make necessary improvements to properties on a timely or cost-efficient basis; risks related to property expansions and renovations; risks related to development projects or acquired property value-add conversions, if applicable, including construction delays, cost overruns, the Company’s inability to obtain necessary permits, and/or public opposition to these activities; competition for properties and/or tenants; defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants; failure to lease properties on favorable terms or at all; the impact of current and future environmental, zoning and other governmental regulations affecting the Company’s properties; the impact of changes in accounting rules; the impact of regulations requiring periodic valuation of the Company on a per share basis; inaccuracies of the Company’s accounting estimates; unknown liabilities of acquired properties or liabilities caused by property managers or operators; material adverse actions or omissions by any joint venture partners; increases in operating costs and other expenses; uninsured losses or losses in excess of the Company’s insurance coverage; the impact of
31
outstanding and/or potential litigation; risks associated with the Company’s tax structuring; failure to qualify for and maintain the Company’s REIT qualification; and the Company’s inability to protect its intellectual property and the value of its brand.
For further information regarding risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business, and important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to vary materially from those expressed or implied in its forward-looking statements, please refer to the factors listed and described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the “Risk Factors” sections of the Company’s documents filed from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to, the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, copies of which may be obtained from the Company’s website at www.cnlhealthcareproperties.com.
All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary note. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, publicly release the results of any revisions to its forward-looking statements to reflect new information, changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated subsequent events or circumstances, or changes to future operating results over time, except as otherwise required by law.
Overview
CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc., (the “Company”), is a Maryland corporation incorporated on June 8, 2010 that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the year ended December 31, 2012 for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The terms “us,” “we,” “our,” “Company” and “CNL Healthcare Properties” include CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries.
We had no operations prior to the commencement of our initial public offering on June 27, 2011 (the “Offering”). The net proceeds from our offering are contributed to CHP Partners, LP, our limited partnership, in exchange for partnership interests. Substantially all of our assets are held by, and all operations are conducted through, the limited partnership.
We are externally managed and advised by CNL Healthcare Corp. (our “Advisor”). Our Advisor is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf. We have also retained CNL Healthcare Manager Corp. (our “Property Manager”) to manage our properties under a six year property management agreement, which goes until June 8, 2017.
Our investment focus is on acquiring a diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate or real estate-related assets, primarily in the United States, within the senior housing, medical office, post-acute care and acute care asset classes. The types of senior housing that we may acquire include active adult communities (age-restricted and age-targeted housing), independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and memory care facilities. The types of medical office facilities that we may acquire include medical office buildings, specialty medical and diagnostic service facilities, surgery centers, outpatient rehabilitation facilities, and other facilities designed for clinical services. The types of post-acute care facilities that we may acquire include skilled nursing facilities, long-term acute care hospitals and inpatient rehabilitative facilities. The types of acute care facilities that we may acquire include general acute care hospitals and specialty surgical hospitals. We view, manage and evaluate our portfolio homogeneously as one collection of healthcare assets with a common goal to maximize revenues and property income regardless of the asset class or asset type.
We primarily expect to lease our properties to third-party tenants under triple-net or similar lease structures, where the tenant bears all or substantially all of the costs (including cost increases, for real estate taxes, utilities, insurance and ordinary repairs); however, we may also invest through other strategic investment types aimed to maximize stockholder value by generating sustainable cash flow growth and increasing the value of our healthcare assets including leasing properties to wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) and engaging independent third-party managers to operate the properties as permitted under the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”). In addition, we expect most investments will be wholly owned, although, we have and may continue to invest through partnerships with other entities where we believe it is appropriate and beneficial. We have and expect to continue to invest in new property developments or properties which have not reached full
32
stabilization. Finally, we also may invest in and originate mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing investment types. We generally make loans to the owners of properties to enable them to acquire land, buildings, or to develop property. In exchange, the owner generally grants us a first lien or collateralized interest in a participating mortgage collateralized by the property or by interests in the entity that owns the property.
Portfolio Overview
We believe recent demographic trends and compelling supply and demand indicators present a strong case for an investment focus on the acquisition of healthcare real estate or real estate-related assets. We believe that the healthcare sector will continue to provide attractive opportunities as compared to other asset sectors. Our healthcare investment portfolio is geographically diversified with properties in 27 states. The map below shows our current property allocations across geographic regions as of August 4, 2014:
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/10-Q/0001193125-14-306714/g730898img001.jpg)
As of August 4, 2014, our healthcare investment portfolio consisted of interests in 85 properties, including 54 senior housing communities, 20 medical offices, nine post-acute care facilities and two acute care hospitals. Four of our 54 senior housing communities currently have real estate under development. Of our properties held at August 4, 2014, six were owned through two unconsolidated joint ventures. The following table summarizes our healthcare portfolio by asset class and investment structure as of August 4, 2014:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type of Investment | | Number of Investments | | | Amount of Investments (in millions) | | | Percentage of Total Investments | |
Consolidated investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior housing leased(1) | | | 10 | | | $ | 157.1 | | | | 10.3 | % |
Senior housing managed(2) | | | 35 | | | | 809.3 | | | | 52.8 | % |
Senior housing developments(3) | | | 4 | | | | 16.7 | | | | 1.1 | % |
Medical office leased(1) | | | 18 | | | | 246.8 | | | | 16.1 | % |
Medical office loan(3) | | | 1 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 0.4 | % |
Post-acute care leased(1) | | | 9 | | | | 187.5 | | | | 12.2 | % |
Acute care leased(1) | | | 2 | | | | 59.0 | | | | 3.8 | % |
Unconsolidated investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Medical facilities leased(4) | | | 1 | | | | 19.8 | | | | 1.3 | % |
Senior housing managed(4) | | | 5 | | | | 31.0 | | | | 2.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 85 | | | $ | 1,533.2 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
33
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Properties that are leased to third-party tenants for which we report rental income from operating leases. |
(2) | Senior housing communities are leased to TRSs and managed pursuant to third-party management contracts (i.e. RIDEA structure) where we report resident fees and services, and the corresponding property operating expenses. |
(3) | Investments herein represent funding and accrued developments costs as of June 30, 2014. |
(4) | Properties that are owned through unconsolidated joint ventures and accounted for using the equity method. |
When evaluating the performance of our portfolio within the senior housing and post-acute care asset classes, management reviews operating statistics of the underlying properties, including occupancy levels and monthly revenue per occupied unit (“RevPOU”), which we define as total revenue divided by average number of occupied units or beds during a month and is a performance metric within these asset classes. Similarly, when evaluating the performance of our portfolio within the medical office and acute care asset classes, management reviews operating statistics of the underlying properties, including occupancy levels and monthly revenue per square foot. Lastly, when evaluating the performance of our third party operators or developers, management reviews monthly financial statements, property level operating performance versus budgeted expectations, conducts periodic operational review calls with operators and conducts periodic property inspections or site visits. All of the aforementioned metrics assist us in determining the ability of our properties or operators to achieve market rental rates, to assess the overall performance of our diversified healthcare portfolio, and to review compliance with leases, debt, licensure, real estate taxes, and other collateral.
Furthermore, in our evaluation of the properties that we have purchased and additional properties that we expect to purchase, we consider the operating stage of the investments within the following stages: development, stabilizing or stabilized. Development properties are those in which we or our joint venture have purchased land for the development of new operating properties. We typically hold rights as the owner or managing member of the development properties while a third-party or our joint venture partner manages the development, construction and certain day-to-day operations of the property subject to our oversight. Stabilizing properties are either developed properties that have been fully constructed and in lease-up phase (typically 18 months post-construction) or existing (“value-add”) properties purchased in which we expect to make capital investments to upgrade or expand. A property is considered stabilized upon the earlier of (i) when the property reaches 85% occupancy for a trailing three month period, or (ii) a two year period from acquisition or completion of development. For those assets that are above an 85% occupancy level and subsequently drop below 85%, they are reclassified to stabilizing until they hit the trailing three month 85% occupancy metric.
We have increased the level of our investment in new ground up development and value-add or stabilizing properties. During the construction and lease up phase, these types of investments are expected to generate limited cash flows from operations and may result in near term downward pressure on our net asset valuation. However, we believe that investing a limited portion of our capital into these types of properties is beneficial because they are expected to provide a higher yield on cost and have higher asset valuations in the long term as compared to stabilized acquisitions. Additionally, these types of assets will result in our portfolio having a lower average age, which we believe will be beneficial at the time that we begin the process of seeking to provide liquidity to our shareholders through a listing, merger or sale of our assets.
The following table lists our occupancy, RevPOU and revenue per square feet for our portfolio as of June 30, 2014:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Stage | | Occupancy % | | | RevPOU | | | Rent per Square Feet | |
Stabilizing: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Housing | | | 72.9 | % | | $ | 2,893 | | | | N/A | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Post-Acute | | | 82.4 | % | | $ | 6,575 | | | | N/A | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stabilized: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Housing | | | 92.8 | % | | $ | 3,611 | | | | N/A | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Medical Office | | | 94.9 | % | | | N/A | | | $ | 2.41 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acute | | | 100.0 | % | | | N/A | | | $ | 2.90 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
34
Tenant Lease Expirations
The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, scheduled expirations for the remainder of 2014, the next 10 years ending December 31st and thereafter on our consolidated healthcare investment portfolio (excludes notes receivable and real estate under development), assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options (in thousands, except for number of tenants and percentages):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year of Expiration(1) | | Number of Tenants | | | Expiring Rentable Square Feet | | | Expiring Annualized Base Rents (2) | | | Percentage of Expiring Annual Base Rents | |
2014 | | | 24 | | | | 97 | | | $ | 2,475 | | | | 5.8 | % |
2015 | | | 41 | | | | 96 | | | | 2,159 | | | | 5.0 | % |
2016 | | | 31 | | | | 99 | | | | 2,584 | | | | 6.0 | % |
2017 | | | 13 | | | | 60 | | | | 1,334 | | | | 3.1 | % |
2018 | | | 24 | | | | 82 | | | | 1,687 | | | | 3.9 | % |
2019 | | | 23 | | | | 94 | | | | 2,341 | | | | 5.4 | % |
2020 | | | 8 | | | | 66 | | | | 1,323 | | | | 3.1 | % |
2021 | | | 7 | | | | 33 | | | | 724 | | | | 1.7 | % |
2022 | | | 13 | | | | 961 | | | | 12,728 | | | | 29.5 | % |
2023 | | | 48 | | | | 555 | | | | 14,716 | | | | 34.1 | % |
Thereafter | | | 1 | | | | 30 | | | | 1,044 | | | | 2.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 233 | | | | 2,173 | | | $ | 43,115 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term:(3) 7.3 years
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Represents current lease expiration and does not take into consideration lease renewals available under existing leases at the option of the tenants. |
(2) | Represents the current base rent, excluding tenant reimbursements and the impact of future rent bumps included in leases, multiplied by 12 and included in the year of expiration. |
(3) | Weighted average remaining lease term is the average remaining term weighted by annualized current base rents. |
35
Significant Tenants and Operators
Our real estate portfolio is operated by a mix of national or regional operators and the following represent the significant tenants and operators that lease or manage 5% or more of our rentable space as of June 30, 2014:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenants and Operators | | Number of Tenants / Properties | | | Rentable Square Feet (in thousands) | | | Percentage of Rentable Square Feet | | | Lease / Operator Expiration Year |
Tenants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TSMM Management, LLC(1) | | | 10 | | | | 945 | | | | 43.5 | % | | 2022 |
Senior Living Centers(2) | | | 6 | | | | 261 | | | | 12.0 | % | | 2023 |
Other tenants(3) | | | 217 | | | | 967 | | | | 45.5 | % | | 2014-2030 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenants Total | | | 233 | | | | 2,173 | | | | 100.0 | % | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operators | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Integrated Senior Living, LLC | | | 5 | | | | 1,319 | | | | 34.3 | % | | 2024 |
Prestige Senior Living, LLC | | | 13 | | | | 895 | | | | 23.3 | % | | 2019 |
MorningStar Senior Management, LLC | | | 4 | | | | 834 | | | | 21.7 | % | | 2018 |
Harbor Retirement Associates, LLC | | | 3 | | | | 246 | | | | 6.4 | % | | 2023 |
Jerry Erwin Associates, Inc. | | | 4 | | | | 235 | | | | 6.1 | % | | 2019 |
Capital Health Managers | | | 5 | | | | 225 | | | | 5.9 | % | | 2017 |
Trinity Lifestyles Management II, LLC | | | 1 | | | | 87 | | | | 2.3 | % | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operators Total | | | 35 | | | | 3,841 | | | | 100.0 | % | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | TSMM Management, LLC is the tenant of the Primrose I and II Communities, which are leased under triple-net leases. These properties have a lease coverage ratio of 1.02x after management fee to the tenant’s affiliate. |
(2) | Senior Living Centers is the tenant of the Perennial Communities, which are leased under triple-net leases. These properties have a lease coverage ratio of 1.22x after management fee to the tenant’s affiliate. |
(3) | Comprised of various tenants each of which comprise less than 5% of our rentable square footage. |
While we are not directly impacted by the performance of the underlying properties leased to third party tenants, we believe that the financial and operational performance of our tenants provides an indication about the health of our tenants and their ability to pay rent. To the extent that our tenants, managers or joint venture partners experience operating difficulties and become unable to generate sufficient cash to make rent payments to us, there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. Our tenants and managers are contractually required to provide this information to us in accordance with their respective lease, management and joint venture agreements. Therefore, in order to mitigate the aforementioned risk, we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property.
We monitor the credit of our tenants to stay abreast of any material changes in quality. We monitor tenant credit quality by (1) reviewing financial statements that are publicly available or that are required to be delivered to us under the applicable lease, (2) direct interaction with onsite property managers, (3) monitoring news and rating agency reports regarding our tenants (or their parent companies) and their underlying businesses, (4) monitoring the timeliness of rent collections and (5) monitoring lease coverage.
36
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our primary source of capital has been and is expected to continue to be proceeds we receive from our Offering. Our principal demands for funds will be for:
| • | | the acquisition of real estate and real estate-related assets, |
| • | | the payment of offering and operating expenses, |
| • | | the payment of debt service on our outstanding indebtedness, and |
| • | | the payment of distributions. |
Generally, we expect to meet cash needs for items other than acquisitions from our cash flows from operations, and we expect to meet cash needs for acquisitions from net proceeds from our Offering and financings. However, until such time as we are fully invested, we may continue to use proceeds from our Offering and financings to pay a portion of our operating expenses, distributions and debt service.
We intend to strategically leverage our real properties and possibly other assets and use debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of properties and the diversification of our portfolio. Our ability to increase our diversification through borrowing could be adversely affected by credit market conditions which result in lenders reducing or limiting funds available for loans, including loans collateralized by real estate. We may also be negatively impacted by rising interest rates on any unhedged variable rate debt or the timing of when we seek to refinance existing debt. During times when interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time. In addition, we will continue to evaluate the need for additional interest rate swaps on unhedged variable rate debt.
Potential future sources of capital include proceeds from collateralized or uncollateralized financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, other assets and undistributed operating cash flows. If necessary, we may use financings or other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.
The number of properties, loans and other permitted investments we may acquire or make will depend on the number of shares sold through our Offering of common stock and the resulting amount of the net offering proceeds available for investment.
Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Common Stock Offering
For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we received offering proceeds of approximately $181.9 million (18.0 million shares) and $174.9 million (17.5 million shares), respectively. During the period July 1, 2014 through August 4, 2014, we received additional subscription proceeds of approximately $45.6 million (4.5 million shares).
We expect to continue to raise capital under our Offering and will extend the Offering through the effective date of a subsequent registration statement. In May 2014, we filed our proposed follow-on offering of up to an additional $750 million in shares of common stock, including approximately $37.5 million in shares to be issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. It is expected that the follow-on offering will become effective and sales will commence by mid-January 2015, subject to the receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals, and continue through the end of 2015, unless earlier terminated by the board of directors. Even though we have filed another registration statement to sell additional shares prior to the expiration of this registration statement, we expect to continue to sell shares in this offering under this registration statement until the effective date of the subsequent registration statement. In August 2014, the board of directors approved an increase of the follow-on offering to $1 billion in shares of common stock which will be reflected in a pre-effective amendment to the follow-on registration statement to be filed by the end of the third quarter.
37
As of June 30, 2014, we had unused offering proceeds of approximately $64.8 million as cash on hand. We used the available uncommitted cash on hand as of June 30, 2014, as well as additional borrowings and offering proceeds obtained subsequently, to acquire additional healthcare real estate and real estate-related assets in July 2014.
Borrowings
We have borrowed and intend to continue borrowing money to acquire properties, make loans and other permitted investments, fund ongoing enhancements to our portfolio, and to cover periodic shortfalls between distributions paid and cash flows from operating activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we borrowed proceeds of approximately $250.2 million and $92.6 million, respectively. These amounts were used to acquire additional properties and refinance existing debt, respectively.
In February 2014, we modified the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility and increased the aggregate maximum principal amount available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility from $120 million to $240 million. In April 2014, we modified the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility and increased the aggregate maximum principal amount available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility from $240 million to $275 million. The Revolving Credit Facility has sizing requirements that govern the total amount that we may borrow at any given time based on the purchase price of our collateral and a metric of debt service coverage. As of June 30, 2014, our total availability was approximately $212.9 million, which is expected to be reduced to approximately $191.0 million in December 2014, unless additional properties are added as collateral, as a result of the sizing metrics resetting to new ratios at year-end.
In May 2014, we received $15 million of additional borrowings in the form of an unsecured bridge loan financing that matures on August 18, 2014 and bears interest at LIBOR plus 8% per annum. In August 2014, we repaid the approximate $15 million unsecured bridge loan financing.
We may borrow money to pay distributions to stockholders, for working capital and for other corporate purposes. See “Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources – Distributions” below for additional information related to the payment of distributions with other sources for GAAP purposes. In many cases, we have pledged our assets in connection with our borrowings and intend to encumber assets in connection with additional borrowings. The aggregate amount of long-term financing is not expected to exceed 60% of our total assets on an annual basis. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had an aggregate debt leverage ratio of approximately 56.6% and 52.9%, respectively, of the aggregate carrying value of our assets.
See Note 10. “Indebtedness” for additional information on our borrowings, including a schedule of future principal payments and maturity dates.
Contributions from Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our co-venture partner made cash capital contributions aggregating to approximately $0.6 million. In accordance with the terms of our joint venture agreement relating to the Watercrest at Katy development property, these amounts will be or have been used to fund part of the land acquisition and initial development costs of the development projects. Refer to Note 13, “Equity,” for additional information.
Distributions from Unconsolidated Entities
As of June 30, 2014, we had investments in six properties through two unconsolidated entities. We are entitled to receive quarterly preferred cash distributions from the Windsor Manor joint venture and distributions on a pro rata basis from the Montecito joint venture to the extent there is cash available to distribute. These distributions are generally received within 45 days after each quarter end.
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we received approximately $1.0 million of operating distributions from our investments in two unconsolidated entities. Similarly, for the six months ended June 30, 2013, we received approximately $1.7 million of operating distributions from our investments in three unconsolidated entities. See “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” below for additional information related to additional capital distributions from the Windsor Manor joint venture of approximately $2.2 million, which resulted from excess proceeds from refinancing the joint venture’s debt that were receivable as of June 30, 2014 and received in July 2014.
38
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
We generally expect to meet future cash needs for general and administrative expenses, debt service and distributions from the net operating income (“NOI”) from our properties, which primarily is rental income from operating leases, resident fees and services, tenant reimbursement income and interest income less the property operating expenses and property management fees from managed properties. We experienced positive cash flow from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 of approximately $11.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
The difference in cash flows from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily the result of the following:
| • | | an increase in total revenues and NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily as the result of having 73 consolidated properties in 2014 as compared with 24 consolidated properties in 2013; |
| • | | approximately $2.9 million in asset management fees that were foregone by our Advisor under the Advisor Expense Support Agreement for the six months ended June 30, 2014 (discussed below), whereas only approximately $0.5 million were foregone during the six months ended June 30, 2013; |
| • | | offset by lower distributions from our unconsolidated entities for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily as the result of having three unconsolidated entities in 2013 as compared with having two unconsolidated entities in 2014 given the sale of our interest in the CHTSunIV joint venture in July 2013; and |
| • | | offset by an increase in acquisition fees and expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014, in which we acquired 16 consolidated operating properties during the period and built a pipeline of acquisitions for Q3 2014, compared with the six months ended June 30, 2013, in which we purchased seven consolidated operating properties. The acquisition fees and expenses were funded from proceeds of our Offering or debt proceeds and are treated as an operating activity in accordance with GAAP. |
As we continue to acquire additional properties we expect that cash flows provided by operating activities will continue to grow.
Expense Support Agreements
As discussed above, during the six months ended June 30, 2014, our cash from operating activities was positively impacted by the Expense Support Agreements, which we entered into with our Advisor and Property Manager commencing on April 1, 2013 and July 1, 2013, respectively, and extended through December 31, 2014. Pursuant to the Expense Support Agreements, our Advisor and Property Manager have agreed to forgo the payment of fees in cash and accept restricted forfeitable stock for services in an amount equal to the positive excess, if any, of (a) aggregate stockholder cash distributions declared for the applicable quarter, over (b) our aggregate modified funds from operations (as defined in the Expense Support Agreements). The expense support amount is determined for each calendar quarter, on a non-cumulative basis, on each quarter-end date. The Property Manager expense support amount is determined for each calendar quarter, on a non-cumulative basis, after the calculation of the Advisor Expense Support Amount pursuant to the Property Manager Expense Support Agreement on each quarter-end date. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, our Advisor had forgone approximately $2.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in asset management fees under the terms of the Advisor Expense Support Agreement. For both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, our Advisor had forgone a total of $0.5 million in asset management fees under the terms of the Advisor Expense Support Agreement. There were no amounts forgone under the Property Manager expense support agreement through June 30, 2014.
Refer to Note 11, “Related Party Arrangements,” for additional information.
39
Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Acquisitions
During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we acquired sixteen and seven consolidated operating properties for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $388.2 million and $69.5 million, respectively. The acquired operating properties were spread across our targeted asset classes and located in five and two different states, respectively, which allowed us to expand both the variety of our asset classes and the geographical diversification of our healthcare investment portfolio. In addition, the operating properties acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2014 increased our total units by 1,303. There were no unit additions for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Furthermore, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, our total leasable square footage increased by approximately 0.3 million and 0.3 million, respectively. We expect to continuously expand our healthcare investment portfolio in the near term through continued acquisitions.
Development Properties
In February 2014, we acquired a tract of land for our Wellmore of Tega Cay development with a total development budget of approximately $35.6 million and a construction loan of $26.3 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we funded approximately $7.4 million for the land purchase and initial development costs. We further expect to fund the remaining difference between the development budget and the construction loan with proceeds from our Offering.
In June 2014, we, through our consolidated joint venture, acquired a tract of land for our Watercrest at Katy development with a total development budget of approximately $38.2 million and a construction loan of $26.7 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we funded approximately $4.9 million for the land purchase and initial development costs. We further expect to fund the remaining difference between the development budget and the construction loan with proceeds from our Offering.
In total, in connection with our various senior housing developments, we funded approximately $22.1 million and $6.4 million in development costs during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Pursuant to the development agreements for the other active senior housing communities under development as of June 30, 2014, we expect to fund approximately $75.7 million of additional development and other costs. We expect to fund the remaining development and other costs primarily from construction loans on each development or with proceeds from our Offering. Our Advisor continues to evaluate additional senior housing development opportunities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we made distributions of approximately $2.0 million to a third-party developer, who is a holder of promoted interest related to our HarborChase of Villages Crossing, which has been recorded as a reduction to capital in excess of par value in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity and redeemable noncontrolling interest. No such payments were made during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Debt Repayments
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we paid approximately $4.0 million of scheduled repayments. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we had total repayments of $115.9 million, which was comprised of the early repayment of $40.0 million on the CHTSunIV mezzanine loan, total repayments of $75.0 on the Primrose II Bridge loan, and approximately $0.9 million of scheduled repayments. As part of the repayment of the CHTSunIV mezzanine loan, we paid an exit fee of $0.8 million upon extinguishment and expensed an additional $0.2 million in unamortized loan costs as a result of our CHTSunIV mezzanine loan being repaid in full prior to its maturity date.
40
Stock Issuance and Offering Costs
Under the terms of the Offering, certain affiliates and third-party broker dealers are entitled to receive selling commissions of up to 7% of gross offering proceeds on all shares sold, a marketing support fee of up to 3% of gross offering proceeds, and reimbursement of actual expenses incurred in connection with the Offering. In accordance with our articles of incorporation and the advisory agreement, the total amount of selling commissions, marketing support fees, due diligence expense reimbursements, and organizational and other offering costs to be paid by us may not exceed 15% of the gross aggregate Offering proceeds.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we paid approximately $19.9 million and $18.5 million, respectively, of stock issuance and offering costs.
Distributions
In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to make distributions, other than capital gain distributions, to our stockholders each year in the amount of at least 90% of our taxable income. We may make distributions in the form of cash or other property, including distributions of our own securities. Until we have sufficient cash flow from operating activities or funds from operations, we have decided and may continue to make stock distributions or to fund all or a portion of the payment of distributions from other sources; such as from cash flows generated by financing activities, a component of which includes our borrowings and the proceeds of our Offering.
On December 6, 2013, our board of directors determined to increase the amount of monthly cash distributions to $0.0338 per share (from $0.0333 per share) and together with monthly stock distributions of 0.0025 shares of common stock payable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on the first business day of each month. The change allows us to maintain our historical distribution rate of 4% cash and 3% stock on each outstanding share of our common stock based on our current public offering price of $10.14. The increase in distributions took effect for stockholders of record on January 1, 2014 and will remain in effect until our board of directors determines otherwise. We may increase the proportion of distributions paid in cash as our asset base grows and our cash flows increase.
41
The following table represents total cash distributions declared, distributions reinvested and cash distributions per share for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Distributions Paid(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Periods | | Cash Distributions per Share | | | Total Cash Distributions Declared(1) | | | Reinvested via Reinvestment Plan | | | Cash Distributions net of Reinvestment Proceeds | | | Stock Distributions Declared (Shares) | | | Stock Distributions Declared (at $10.14 offering price) | | | Total Cash and Stock Distributions Declared(2) | | | Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities(3) | |
2014 Quarters | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First | | $ | 0.1014 | | | $ | 6,147 | | | $ | 3,349 | | | $ | 2,798 | | | | 455 | | | $ | 4,614 | | | $ | 10,761 | | | $ | 6,277 | |
Second | | | 0.1014 | | | | 7,145 | | | | 3,916 | | | | 3,229 | | | | 529 | | | | 5,368 | | | | 12,513 | | | | 5,035 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 0.2028 | | | $ | 13,292 | | | $ | 7,265 | | | $ | 6,027 | | | | 984 | | | $ | 9,982 | | | $ | 23,274 | | | $ | 11,312 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Distributions Paid(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Periods | | Cash Distributions per Share | | | Total Cash Distributions Declared(1) | | | Reinvested via Reinvestment Plan | | | Cash Distributions net of Reinvestment Proceeds | | | Stock Distributions Declared (Shares) | | | Stock Distributions Declared (at $10.00 offering price) | | | Total Cash and Stock Distributions Declared(2) | | | Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities(3) | |
2013 Quarters | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First | | $ | 0.09999 | | | $ | 2,099 | | | $ | 1,112 | | | $ | 987 | | | | 157 | | | $ | 1,574 | | | $ | 3,673 | | | $ | 212 | |
Second | | | 0.09999 | | | | 2,878 | | | | 1,544 | | | | 1,334 | | | | 216 | | | | 2,159 | | | | 5,037 | | | | 2,964 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 0.19998 | | | $ | 4,977 | | | $ | 2,656 | | | $ | 2,321 | | | | 373 | | | $ | 3,733 | | | $ | 8,710 | | | $ | 3,176 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
42
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Represents the amount of cash used to fund distributions and the amount of distributions paid which were reinvested in additional shares through our Reinvestment Plan. |
(2) | Our net loss was approximately $24.8 million and $6.6 million and total distributions declared were approximately $23.3 million and $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, approximately 51% and 64%, respectively, of total distributions declared to stockholders were considered to be funded with other sources (i.e., Offering proceeds) and 49% and 36%, respectively, were considered to be funded with cash provided by operating activities as calculated on a quarterly basis for GAAP purposes. |
| For the six months ended June 30, 2014, 25.4% of distributions were considered taxable for federal income tax purposes and 74.6% were considered a return of capital. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, 100% of distributions were considered a return of capital. No amounts distributed to stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were required to be or have been treated by the Company as a taxable for purposes of calculating the stockholders’ return on their invested capital as described in the Company’s advisory agreement. The distribution of new common shares to recipients is non-taxable. |
(3) | Cash flows from operating activities calculated in accordance with GAAP are not necessarily indicative of the amount of cash available to pay distributions. For example, GAAP requires that the payment of acquisition fees and costs related to business combinations be classified as a use of cash in operating activities in the statement of cash flows, which directly reduces the measure of cash flows from operations. However, acquisition fees and costs are paid for with proceeds from our offering as opposed to operating cash flows. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we expensed approximately $12.0 million and $2.9 million in acquisition fees and expenses, respectively, which were paid from the proceeds of our Offering. Additionally, the board of directors also uses other measures such as FFO in order to evaluate the level of distributions. |
Common Stock Redemptions
We have adopted a share redemption plan that allows our stockholders who hold shares for at least one year to request that we redeem between 25% and 100% of their shares. If we have sufficient funds available to do so and if we choose, in our sole discretion, to redeem shares, the number of shares we may redeem in any calendar year and the price at which they are redeemed are subject to conditions and limitations, including:
| • | | If we elect to redeem shares, some or all of the proceeds from the sale of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan attributable to any quarter may be used to redeem shares presented for redemption during such quarter. In addition, we may use the unused amount of any offering proceeds available for use in future quarters to the extent not used to invest in assets or for other purposes; |
| • | | No more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during such 12-month period may be redeemed during such 12-month period; and |
| • | | Redemption pricing shall not exceed an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the then-current public offering price for our shares of common stock (other than the price at which the shares are sold under our Reinvestment Plan); and (ii) the purchaser price paid by the stockholder. |
Our board of directors has the ability, in their sole discretion, to amend or suspend the redemption plan or to waive any specific conditions if it is deemed to be in our best interest.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we received requests for the redemption of common stock totaling approximately $0.9 million, of which $0.7 million was paid in July 2014. Similarly, during the six months ended June 30, 2013, we received requests for the redemption of common stock totaling approximately $0.4 million, of which approximately $0.2 million was paid in July 2013.
43
The following tables present a summary of requests received and shares redeemed pursuant to our stock redemption plan during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2014 Quarters | | First | | | Second | | | Total | |
Redemptions Requested | | | 28,343 | | | | 75,313 | | | | 103,656 | |
Shares Redeemed | | | (28,343 | ) | | | (75,313 | ) | | | (103,656 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pending redemption requests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Price paid per share | | | 9.13 | | | | 9.13 | | | | 9.13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
2013 Quarters | | First | | | Second | | | Total | |
Redemptions Requested | | | 23,565 | | | | 22,692 | | | | 46,257 | |
Shares Redeemed | | | (23,565 | ) | | | (22,692 | ) | | | (46,257 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pending redemption requests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Price paid per share | | | 9.30 | | | | 9.02 | | | | 9.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
As of June 30, 2014, we owned 74 real estate investment properties and our portfolio consisted of 3,725 units operated under management agreements with third-party operators and approximately 2.2 million leasable square feet that was 95.6% leased to third-party tenants.
In understanding our operating results in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, it is important to understand how the growth in our assets has impacted our results. The chart below illustrates our net losses and property-level NOI for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands), and the amount invested in properties as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarters ended June 30, | | | Six months ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 42,464 | | | $ | 8,609 | | | $ | 75,739 | | | $ | 16,411 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | | 22,567 | | | | 3,331 | | | | 38,987 | | | | 6,548 | |
Property management fees | | | 2,124 | | | | 485 | | | | 3,760 | | | | 941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOI | | | 17,773 | | | | 4,793 | | | | 32,992 | | | | 8,922 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 1,935 | | | | 1,568 | | | | 3,692 | | | | 2,677 | |
Acquisition fees and expenses | | | 4,792 | | | | 2,366 | | | | 11,997 | | | | 2,944 | |
Asset management fees | | | 1,049 | | | | 598 | | | | 2,819 | | | | 1,587 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 14,699 | | | | 2,563 | | | | 26,561 | | | | 4,882 | |
Contingent purchase price consideration adjustment | | | (1,321 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,321 | ) | | | — | |
Other expenses, net of other income | | | 8,920 | | | | 497 | | | | 14,098 | | | | 3,453 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 2 | | | | 31 | | | | (28 | ) | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,303 | ) | | $ | (2,830 | ) | | $ | (24,826 | ) | | $ | (6,639 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Invested in operating properties, end of period | | | 1,286,331 | | | | 311,655 | | | | 1,286,331 | | | | 311,655 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
44
We anticipate using our cash on hand as of June 30, 2014, additional borrowings as well as additional net offering proceeds received subsequent to year-end through the close of our Offering to invest in additional properties. As such, we anticipate additional operating income will be generated in subsequent periods due to further investment of Offering proceeds.
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, that may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of properties, loans and other permitted investments, other than those referred to in the risk factors identified in “Part II, Item 1A” of this report and the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013
Rental Income from Operating Leases. Rental income from operating leases was approximately $10.4 million and $20.1 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, as compared to $4.1 million and $7.6 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in rental income from operating leases resulted from our acquisition of 17 medical office buildings and two acute care hospitals subsequent to June 30, 2013 as well as the medical office building and six skilled nursing facilities acquired during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 being owned for the entire six months ended June 30, 2014. We expect this revenue stream to increase as these investments are held in future periods, our value-add and developed properties stabilize and we acquire additional properties with operating leases.
Resident Fees and Services. Resident fees and services income was approximately $30.5 million and $52.5 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, as compared to approximately $4.5 million and $8.8 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in resident fees and services is a result of the 30 managed senior housing communities acquired subsequent to June 30, 2013. We expect this revenue stream to increase as these investments are held in future periods and we acquire additional managed senior housing communities.
Tenant Reimbursement Income. Tenant reimbursement income was approximately $1.4 and $2.8 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014. Tenant reimbursement income was approximately $0.01 million for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. This amount is comprised of common area maintenance (“CAM”) revenue and the increase resulted from our acquisition of 17 medical office buildings and two acute care hospitals subsequent to June 30, 2013 as well as the medical office building acquired during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 being owned for the entire six months ended June 30, 2014. We expect this revenue stream to increase as these investments are held in future periods and we acquire additional properties with modified operating leases.
Interest Income on Note Receivable from Related Party. Interest income on note receivable from related party was approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014. Interest income on note receivable from related party was approximately three thousand dollars for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. This amount is comprised of interest income on the outstanding amounts of the ADC loan made to Crosland Southeast for the HCA Rutland development beginning in June 2013. The ADC loan is scheduled to mature in December 2014 as the six month extension option held by the borrower was exercised in June 2014.
Property Operating Expenses. Property operating expenses were approximately $22.6 million and $39.0 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, compared to approximately $3.3 million and $6.5 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. This increase is a result of our acquisition of 30 managed senior housing communities, 17 medical office buildings and two acute care hospitals subsequent to June 30, 2013 as well as the medical office building and six skilled nursing facilities acquired during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 being owned for the entire six months ended June 30, 2014. We expect property operating expenses to increase as these investments are held in future periods, our value-add and developed properties stabilize and we acquire additional managed properties.
45
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 were approximately $1.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively, as compared to approximately $1.6 million and $2.7 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. General and administrative expenses were comprised primarily of personnel expenses of affiliates of our Advisor, directors’ and officers’ insurance, accounting and legal fees, and board of director fees and will continue to grow as our asset base increases. The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily attributed to increased costs as a result of the growth of our portfolio. Specifically, we incurred increased personnel expenses reimbursable to the Advisor due to increased accounting, legal and administrative activity as a result of the growth of the portfolio and related reporting. We expect increases in general and administrative expenses in the future as we purchase additional real estate properties and the properties acquired as of June 30, 2014 are operational for a full period.
Acquisition Fees and Expenses.Acquisition fees and expenses for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 were approximately $6.2 million $14.6 million, respectively, of which approximately $1.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively, were capitalized as real estate under development in 2014. We incurred approximately $2.6 million and $3.4 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, of which approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, were capitalized as investment in unconsolidated entities. The increase in acquisition fees and expenses resulted from the acquisition of six and sixteen operating properties, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared with the acquisition of seven for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. We expect to incur additional acquisition fees and expenses in the future as we purchase additional real estate or real estate-related assets.
Asset Management Fees. We incurred approximately $3.1 million and $5.8 million in asset management fees payable to our Advisor during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, as compared to approximately $1.1 million and $2.1 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately $2.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in asset management fees were forgone in accordance with the terms of the Expense Support Agreements and approximately $0.07 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were capitalized as real estate under development. As described in Note 11, “Related Party Arrangements,” during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, asset management fees were reduced by $2.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, because the shares of restricted stock, which will be accepted by the Advisor as payment for asset management services rendered, were valued at zero— the lowest possible value estimated at vesting since the vesting criteria had not been met. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, approximately $0.5 million in asset management fees were forgone and settled with issuance of restricted stock in accordance with the Expense Support Agreements. Monthly asset management fees equal to 0.08334% of invested assets are paid to the Advisor for management of our real estate assets, including our pro rata share of our investments in unconsolidated entities, loans and other permitted investments. We expect increases in asset management fees in the future as we purchase additional real estate or real estate-related assets and the properties owned as of June 30, 2014 are operational for a full period; however, a portion of such fees may be settled in the form of forfeitable restricted stock under the Expense Support Agreements.
Property Management Fees. We incurred approximately $2.3 million and $4.1 million in property management fees for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and approximately $0.5 million and $0.9 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were capitalized as real estate under development. Property management fees generally range from 2% to 5% of property revenues for leased properties depending on the type of property and are paid to third-party managers. However, an oversight fee equal to 1% of property revenues is paid to the Property Manager for those properties managed by a third-party. Overall property management fees increased as a result of the increases in rental income from operating leases and resident fees and services from acquisitions subsequent to June 30, 2013 as well as the properties acquired during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 being owned for the entire six months ended June 30, 2014. Although we expect total property management fees will increase during 2014, a portion of such fees may be settled in the form of forfeitable restricted stock under the Expense Support Agreements.
46
Contingent purchase price consideration adjustment. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, based on lower than expected occupancy and revised projections of future net operating income, we determined the fair value of our Capital Health Yield Guaranty to be approximately $3.5 million as of June 30, 2014 as compared with approximately $2.2 million as of December 31, 2013. As a result, we have reflected our revised fair value estimate by approximately $1.3 million as a reduction to our operating loss in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014. There was no such contingent purchase price consideration adjustment for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013.
Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization expenses for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 were approximately $14.7 million and $26.6 million, respectively, and approximately $2.6 million and $4.9 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expenses are comprised of depreciation and amortization of the buildings, equipment, land improvements and in-place leases related to our real estate portfolio. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense across periods resulted from our acquisition of 30 managed senior housing communities, 17 medical office buildings and two acute care hospitals subsequent to June 30, 2013 as well as the medical office building and six skilled nursing facilities acquired during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 being owned for the entire six months ended June 30, 2014. We expect depreciation and amortization expense to increase as these investments are held in future periods and we acquire additional properties.
Interest Expense and Loan Cost Amortization. Interest expense and loan cost amortization for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 were approximately $7.7 million and $13.6 million, respectively, of which $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, was capitalized as development costs relating to our real estate under development. Interest expense and loan cost amortization for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $1.8 million and $5.2 million, respectively, of which approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were capitalized as development costs relating to our real estate under development. Approximately $5.3 million and $7.1 million of the increase for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, was primarily the result of an increase in our average debt outstanding to approximately $734.0 million and $673.3 million, respectively, as compared with approximately $151.9 million and $181.5 million, respectively, for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. In addition, during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, we incurred approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in additional loan costs amortization relating to debt obtained subsequent to June 30, 2013, as well as approximately $0.05 million and $0.1 million, respectively, relating to debt obtained on properties acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase across the six month periods was partially offset by a write-off of approximately $0.2 million as a loss on the early extinguishment of debt and the payment of an exit fee of approximately $0.8 million upon extinguishment of the CHTSunIV mezzanine loan prior to its maturity date during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Entities. Our unconsolidated entities generated losses of approximately $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, relating to our investments in the Windsor Manor and Montecito joint ventures, as compared to earnings of approximately $1.2 million and $1.5 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 relating to our investments in the CHTSunIV, Windsor Manor and Montecito joint ventures. Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities is determined using the hypothetical liquidation method book value (“HLBV”) method of accounting, which can create significant variability in earnings or loss from the joint venture while the preferred cash distributions that we anticipate to receive from the joint venture may be more consistent as result of our distribution preferences. The change in equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities was impacted by the sale of our interest in CHTSunIV in July 2013.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense).During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized state and federal income tax benefit (expense) related to our properties of approximately three thousand dollars and $0.03 million, respectively, as compared to approximately ($0.03) million and ($0.02) million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
47
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, National Association Real Estate Investment Trust (“NAREIT”), promulgated a measure known as funds from operations (“FFO”), which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under GAAP.
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT. NAREIT defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property, real estate asset impairment write-downs, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate-related assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or is requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value of the property. We believe that, because real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate-related depreciation and amortization, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income or loss. However, FFO and modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or loss in its applicability in evaluating operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses for business combinations from a capitalization/depreciation model) to an expensed-as-incurred model that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses, as items that are expensed under GAAP and accounted for as operating expenses. Our management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after its acquisition activity ceases. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association (“IPA”), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a non-listed REIT. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we acquired our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry.
48
We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: MFFO, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income or loss: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to remove the impact of GAAP straight-line adjustments from rental revenues); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, and unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized.
Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income or loss. These expenses are paid in cash by us. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property.
Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. For example, acquisition costs are funded from our subscription proceeds and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different non-listed REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way and as such comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flows available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure in an offering such as ours where the price of a share of common stock is a stated value and there is no net asset value determination during the offering stage and for a period thereafter. MFFO is useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. FFO and MFFO are not useful measures in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO and MFFO.
49
Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust its calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to FFO and MFFO for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended June 30, | | | Six months ended June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,303 | ) | | $ | (2,830 | ) | | $ | (24,826 | ) | | $ | (6,639 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 14,699 | | | | 2,563 | | | | 26,561 | | | | 4,882 | |
FFO adjustments from unconsolidated entities (6) | | | 1,859 | | | | 1,197 | | | | 2,020 | | | | 2,245 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total funds from operations | | | 4,255 | | | | 930 | | | | 3,755 | | | | 488 | |
Acquisition fees and expenses (1) | | | 4,792 | | | | 2,366 | | | | 11,997 | | | | 2,944 | |
Straight-line adjustments for leases (2) | | | (650 | ) | | | (419 | ) | | | (1,271 | ) | | | (836 | ) |
Amortization of above/below market intangible assets and liabilities (3) | | | 64 | | | | — | | | | 117 | | | | — | |
Loss on extinguishment of debt (4) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 244 | |
Adjustments relating to contingent purchase price obligations (5) | | | (1,321 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,321 | ) | | | — | |
MFFO adjustments from unconsolidated entities (6) | | | 19 | | | | — | | | | 33 | | | | 322 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Modified funds from operations | | $ | 7,159 | | | $ | 2,877 | | | $ | 13,310 | | | $ | 3,162 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding (basic and diluted) (7) | | | 72,858 | | | | 32,486 | | | | 67,979 | | | | 28,432 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share (basic and diluted) | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.37 | ) | | $ | (0.23 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO per share (basic and diluted) | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.02 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MFFO per share (basic and diluted) | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | In evaluating investments in real estate, management differentiates the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. By adding back acquisition expenses, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information of its operating performance and will also allow comparability between different real estate entities regardless of their level of acquisition activities. Acquisition expenses include payments to our Advisor or third parties. Acquisition expenses for business combinations under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid or accrued acquisition expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property. |
(2) | Under GAAP, rental receipts are allocated to periods using various methodologies. This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items (to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments, providing insight on the contractual cash flows of such lease terms and debt investments, and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance. |
50
(3) | Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed at least annually for impairment, and certain intangibles are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and are amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate-related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges relating to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate. |
(4) | Management believes that adjusting for the realized loss on the early extinguishment of debt is appropriate because the write-off of unamortized loan costs is a non-recurring, non-cash adjustment that is not reflective of our ongoing operating performance and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance. |
(5) | Management believes that the elimination of the adjustments relating to contingent purchase price obligations included in operating income (expense) for GAAP purposes is appropriate because the adjustment is a non-recurring, non-cash adjustment that is not reflective of our ongoing operating performance and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance. |
(6) | This amount represents our share of the FFO or MFFO adjustments allowable under the NAREIT or IPA definitions, respectively, calculated using the HLBV method. |
(7) | For purposes of determining the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, stock distributions are treated as if they were outstanding as of the beginning of the periods presented. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In June 2014, our Windsor Manor joint venture refinanced approximately $18 million of its then-current outstanding debt related to five senior housing communities in Iowa of which approximately $11.6 million related to a bridge loan maturing on June 30, 2014 and the approximate $6.4 million remaining related to the extinguishment of joint venture’s other mortgage loans prior to the scheduled expirations. In connection therewith, the joint venture paid an exit fee of approximately $0.5 million upon extinguishment of the mortgage loans. The new loan includes a five year term with monthly principal and interest payments based upon a 25-year amortization and a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5%. In addition, in connection with the refinancing, our Windsor Manor joint venture received aggregate proceeds of $22 million of which approximately $0.4 million were used to pay loan costs associated with the refinancing and the remaining $3.6 million were available for capital distribution to the members. As of June 30, 2014, our Windsor Manor joint venture declared capital distributions of $2.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, to us and our joint venture partner as a return of capital. These capital distributions are to be paid to the respective members in July 2014.
51
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents our contractual obligations and the related payment periods as of June 30, 2014:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period | |
| | 2014 | | | 2015-2016 | | | 2017-2018 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage and other notes payable (principal and interest) | | $ | 30,522 | | | $ | 129,672 | | | $ | 335,554 | | | $ | 253,127 | | | $ | 748,875 | |
Revolving Credit Facility (principal and interest) | | | 3,453 | | | | 222,125 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 225,578 | |
Development contracts on development properties(1) | | | 48,279 | | | | 27,414 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 75,693 | |
Ground and air rights leases(2) | | | 96 | | | | 391 | | | | 403 | | | | 21,052 | | | | 21,942 | |
| | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 82,350 | | | $ | 379,602 | | | $ | 335,957 | | | $ | 274,179 | | | $ | 1,072,088 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | The amounts presented above represent accrued development costs as of June 30, 2014 and development costs not yet incurred of the aggregate budgeted development costs, including start-up costs, in accordance with the development agreements, and the expected timing of such costs. The amounts include approximately $71.9 million of contractual obligations with third-party developers and approximately $3.8 million of additional expected development costs that have been included in the respective development budgets. |
(2) | Ground and air rights leases are operating leases with scheduled payments over the life of the respective leases and with expirations ranging from 2053 to 2082. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See Item 1. “Financial Statements” and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 for a summary of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Item 1. “Financial Information” for a summary of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.
Subsequent Events
See Item 1. “Financial Information” for a listing of subsequent events.
52
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks |
We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire properties and to make loans and other permitted investments. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we expect to borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available, and in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. With regard to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.
We may be exposed to foreign currency exchange rate movements in the event that we invest outside of the United States. At such time as we have foreign investments, we will evaluate various foreign currency risk mitigating strategies in an effort to minimize any impact on earnings.
The following is a schedule as of June 30, 2014, of our variable rate debt maturities for the remainder of 2014 and each of the next four years, and thereafter (principal maturities only) (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Expected Maturities | | | | |
| | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | | 2017 | | | 2018 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | | | Fair Value | |
Fixed rate debt | | $ | 4,100 | | | $ | 8,557 | | | $ | 8,917 | | | $ | 9,319 | | | $ | 203,230 | | | $ | 143,468 | | | $ | 377,591 | | | $ | 370,000 | (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average interest rate on fixed debt | | | 4.26 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 4.21 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable rate debt | | $ | 15,872 | | | $ | 4,032 | | | $ | 277,427 | | | $ | 18,943 | | | $ | 70,301 | | | $ | 45,873 | | | $ | 432,448 | | | $ | 423,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average interest rate on variable rate debt | | | Libor + 3.07% | | | | Libor + 2.84% | | | | Libor + 2.85% | | | | Libor + 2.90% | | | | Libor + 2.86% | | | | Libor + 3.25% | | | | Libor + 2.93% | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | The estimated fair value of our fixed rate debt was determined using discounted cash flows based on market interest rates as of June 30, 2014. We determined market rates through discussions with our existing lenders pricing our loans with similar terms and current rates and spreads. |
Management estimates that a one-percentage point increase in LIBOR in 2014 compared to LIBOR rates as of June 30, 2014 would result in additional interest expense on our variable rate debt of approximately $4.3 million for the year ending December 31, 2014. This sensitivity analysis contains certain simplifying assumptions, and although it gives an indication of our exposure to changes in interest rates, it is not intended to predict future results and actual results will likely vary given that our sensitivity analysis on the effects of changes in LIBOR does not factor in a potential change in variable rate debt levels or any offsetting gains on interest rate swap contracts.
53
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.
We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined under Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings-None |
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our assessment of our risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
Development and stabilizing properties are expected to initially generate limited cash flows.
We have increased the level of our investment in new ground-up development and value-add or stabilizing properties. During the construction and lease-phase, these types of investments are expected to initially generate limited cash flows, FFO and MFFO and may result in near term downward pressure on our net asset valuation.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
During the period covered by this quarterly report, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, and we did not repurchase any of our securities.
Secondary Sales of Registered Shares between Investors
We are not aware of any transfers of shares by investors for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and we are not aware of any other trades of our shares, other than previous purchases made in our public offerings and redemptions of shares by us. In July 2014, we became aware of transfers of 1,039 shares by investors. The shares were transferred at a sales price of $8.57 per share.
54
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
On June 27, 2011, our Registration Statement (File No. 333-168129), covering a public offering of up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock, was declared effective by the SEC, and our Offering commenced and is ongoing. The use of proceeds from our Offering was as follows as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands, except shares):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | | Payments to Affiliates (2) | | | Payments to Others | |
Shares registered | | | 300,000,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Aggregate price of offering amount registered | | $ | 3,000,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold(1) | | | 73,957,635 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Aggregate amount sold | | $ | 741,429 | | | | | | | | | |
Offering expenses(3) | | | (86,505 | ) | | $ | (53,152 | ) | | $ | (33,353 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net offering proceeds to the issuer | | | 654,924 | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings, net of loan costs | | | 908,944 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net offering proceeds and borrowings | | | 1,563,868 | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of real estate and development costs | | | (1,288,494 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,288,274 | ) |
Repayment of borrowings | | | (128,710 | ) | | | — | | | | (128,710 | ) |
Payment of acquisition fees and expenses | | | (46,852 | ) | | | (29,133 | ) | | | (17,719 | ) |
Investments in unconsolidated entities | | | (15,947 | ) | | | — | | | | (15,947 | ) |
Deposits on real estate | | | (6,266 | ) | | | — | | | | (6,266 | ) |
Issuance of note receivable to related party | | | (5,651 | ) | | | (5,651 | ) | | | — | |
Payment of distributions | | | (3,431 | ) | | | (15 | ) | | | (3,416 | ) |
Operating expenses(4) | | | (1,801 | ) | | | (1,466 | ) | | | (335 | ) |
Payment of lender deposits | | | (1,297 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,297 | ) |
Redemption of common stock | | | (375 | ) | | | — | | | | (375 | ) |
Payment of leasing costs | | | (271 | ) | | | — | | | | (271 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unused proceeds from Offering and borrowings | | $ | 64,773 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTES:
(1) | Excludes 22,222 unregistered shares of our common stock sold to the Advisor in June 2010 and approximately 2.3 million shares issued as stock distributions as of June 30, 2014. |
(2) | Represents direct or indirect payments to directors, officers, or general partners of the issuer or their associates; to persons owning 10% or more of any class of equity securities of the issuer; and to affiliates of the issuer. |
(3) | Excludes dividend reinvestment proceeds of approximately $16.6 million. |
(4) | Offering expenses paid to affiliates includes selling commissions and marketing support fees paid to the Managing Dealer of our Offering (all or a portion of which may be paid to unaffiliated participating brokers by the Managing Dealer). Reimbursements to our Advisor of expenses of the Offering that it has incurred on our behalf from unrelated parties such as legal fees, auditing fees, printing costs, and registration fees are included in payments to others for purposes of this table. |
(5) | Until such time as we have sufficient operating cash flows from our assets, we will pay distributions, debt service and/or operating expenses from net proceeds of our Offering and borrowings. The amounts presented above represent the net proceeds used for such purposes as of June 30, 2014. |
We intend to pay offering expenses, acquire properties and make other permitted investments with proceeds from the Offering. In addition, we have paid, and until such time as we have sufficient operating cash flows from our assets, we will continue to pay distributions and operating expenses from our net proceeds from our Offering.
55
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table presents details regarding our repurchase of securities between April 1, 2014 and June 30, 2014 (in thousands except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total number of shares purchased | | | Average price paid per share | | | Total number of shares purchased as part of a publically announced plan | | | Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan(1) | |
April 1, 2014 through April 30, 2014 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,165,093 | |
May 1, 2014 through May 31, 2014 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,249,733 | |
June 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014 | | | 103,656 | | | $ | 9.13 | | | | 103,656 | | | | 1,274,809 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 103,656 | | | $ | 9.13 | | | | 103,656 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FOOTNOTE:
(1) | This represents the maximum number of shares which can be redeemed under the redemption plan is subject to a five percent limitation in a rolling 12-month period as described above. However, we are not obligated to redeem such amounts and this does not take into account the amount the board of directors has determined to redeem or whether there are sufficient proceeds under the redemption plan. Under the redemption plan, we can, at our discretion, use the full amount of the proceeds from the sale of shares under our Reinvestment Plan attributable to any month to redeem shares presented for redemption during such month. Any amount of Offering proceeds which is available for redemptions but which is unused may be carried over to the next succeeding calendar quarter for use in addition to the amount of Offering proceeds and Reinvestment Plan proceeds that would otherwise be available for redemptions. |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None |
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosure - Not Applicable |
Item 5. | Other Information - None |
The exhibits required by this item are set forth in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are filed or incorporated as part of this report.
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, on the 12th day of August 2014.
| | |
CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. |
| |
By: | | /s/ Stephen H. Mauldin |
| | STEPHEN H. MAULDIN |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
By: | | /s/ Joseph T. Johnson |
| | JOSEPH T. JOHNSON |
| | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) |
57
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(Filed herewith.) |
| |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(Filed herewith.) |
| |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc., Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(Filed herewith.) |
| |
101 | | The following materials from CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language); (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
58