Summary of Principal Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Principal Accounting Policies (a) Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). (b) Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company, its subsidiaries and consolidated VIEs. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. A consolidated subsidiary is an entity in which the Company, directly or indirectly, controls more than one half of the voting power or has the power to: appoint or remove the majority of the members of the board of directors; cast a majority of votes at the meeting of the board of directors; or govern the financial and operating policies of the investee under a statute or agreement among the shareholders or equity holders. U.S. GAAP provides guidance on the identification and financial reporting for entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting interests. The Group evaluates each of its interests in private companies to determine whether or not the investee is a VIE and, if so, whether the Group is the primary beneficiary of such VIE. In determining whether the Group is the primary beneficiary, the Group considers if the Group (1) has power to direct the activities that most significantly affects the economic performance of the VIE, and (2) receives the economic benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. If deemed the primary beneficiary, the Group consolidates the VIE. The Company had been engaged in the fund distribution business and distribution of asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies as part of its business through contractual arrangements among its PRC subsidiary, Shanghai Noah Investment (Group) Co., Ltd (formerly known as Shanghai Noah Rongyao Investment Consulting Co., Ltd). (“Noah Rongyao”), its PRC variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and Noah Investment’s shareholders because it was difficult for foreign investor entities and subsidiaries of foreign investor entities to apply for a fund distribution license. Noah Upright, a subsidiary of Noah Investment before March 2016, holds the licenses and permits necessary to conduct fund distribution and distribution of asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies in China. However, as the license and permit approval authorities relaxed their requirements for foreign investor entities to apply for fund distribution license, Noah Upright was restructured to be a subsidiary of Shanghai Noah Financial Services Corp., or Noah Financial Services, through equity transfer in March 2016. Since the Company does not have any equity interests in Noah Investment, in order to exercise effective control over its operations, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Noah Rongyao, entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Noah Investment and its shareholders, pursuant to which the Company is entitled to receive effectively all economic benefits generated from Noah Investment shareholders’ equity interests in it. These contractual arrangements include: (i) a Power of Attorney Agreement under which each shareholder of Noah Investment has executed a power of attorney to grant Noah Rongyao or its designee the power of attorney to act on his or her behalf on all matters pertaining to Noah Investment and to exercise all of his or her rights as a shareholder of the Company, (ii) an Exclusive Option Agreement under which the shareholders granted Noah Investment or its third-party designee an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase their equity interests in Noah Investment when and to the extent permitted by PRC law, (iii) an Exclusive Support Service Agreement under which Noah Investment engages Noah Rongyao as its exclusive technical and operational consultant and under which Noah Rongyao agrees to assist in arranging the financial support necessary to conduct Noah Investment’s operational activities, (iv) a Share Pledge Agreement under which the shareholders pledged all of their equity interests in Noah Investment to Noah Rongyao as collateral to secure their obligations under the agreement, and (v) a Free-Interest Loan Agreement under which each shareholder of Noah Investment entered into a loan agreement with Noah Rongyao for their respective investment in the equity interests in Noah Investment. The total amount of interest-free loans extended to the Founders is RMB27 million (approximately US$3.6 million) which has been injected into Noah Investment. The Founders of Noah Investment effectively acted as a conduit to fund the required capital contributions from the Company into Noah Rongyao, are non-substantive re-entered no-interest no-interest The Exclusive Option Agreement and Power of Attorney Agreements provide the Company effective control over the VIE and its subsidiaries, while the equity pledge agreements secure the equity owners’ obligations under the relevant agreements. Because the Company, through Noah Rongyao, has (i) the power to direct the activities of Noah Investment that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the right to receive substantially all of the benefits from Noah Investment, the Company is deemed the primary beneficiary of Noah Investment. Accordingly, the Group has consolidated the financial statements of Noah Investment since its inception. The aforementioned contractual agreements are effective agreements between a parent and a consolidated subsidiary, neither of which is accounted for in the consolidated financial statements (i.e. a call option on subsidiary shares under the Exclusive Option Agreement or a guarantee of subsidiary performance under the Share Pledge Agreement) or are ultimately eliminated upon consolidation (i.e. service fees under the Exclusive Support Service Agreement or loans payable/receivable under the Loan Agreement). The Company believes that these contractual arrangements are in compliance with PRC laws and regulations and are legally enforceable. The restructure of fund distribution business from Noah Investment to Noah Financial Service in 2016 and the transfer of Tianjin Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd and Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd from Noah Rongyao to Noah Investment in 2012 do not impact the legal effectiveness of these contractual arrangements and do not impact the conclusion that the Company is the primary beneficiary of Noah Investment and its subsidiaries. However, the aforementioned contractual arrangements with Noah Investment and its shareholders are subject to risks and uncertainties, including: • Noah Investment and its shareholders may have or develop interests that conflict with the Group’s interests, which may lead them to pursue opportunities in violation of the aforementioned contractual arrangements. • Noah Investment and its shareholders could fail to obtain the proper operating licenses or fail to comply with other regulatory requirements. As a result, the PRC government could impose fines, new requirements or other penalties on the VIE or the Group, mandate a change in ownership structure or operations for the VIE or the Group, restrict the VIE or the Group’s use of financing sources or otherwise restrict the VIE or the Group’s ability to conduct business. • The aforementioned contractual agreements may be unenforceable or difficult to enforce. The equity interests under the Share Pledge Agreement have been registered by the shareholders of Noah Investment with the relevant office of the administration of industry and commerce, however, the VIE or the Group may fail to meet other requirements. Even if the agreements are enforceable, they may be difficult to enforce given the uncertainties in the PRC legal system. • The PRC government may declare the aforementioned contractual arrangements invalid. They may modify the relevant regulations, have a different interpretation of such regulations, or otherwise determine that the Group or the VIE have failed to comply with the legal obligations required to effectuate such contractual arrangements. • It may be difficult to finance Noah Investment by means of loans or capital contributions. Loans from the offshore parent company to the VIE must be approved by the relevant PRC government body and such approval may be difficult or impossible to obtain. In 2017, the Group invested in an investment fund which it served as general partner and subscribed 29% of equity interest with the intention of transferring the equity interest to other parties in the future. As the Group is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in the investment fund as of December 31, 2017, the Group consolidated the investment fund as a primary beneficiary. The following amounts of Noah Investment and its subsidiaries and the consolidated fund were included in the Group’s consolidated financial statements and are presented before the elimination of intercompany transactions with the non-VIE subsidiaries of the Group. As of December 31 (Amount in Thousands) 2016 2017 2017 RMB RMB US$ Cash and cash equivalents (including cash and cash equivalents of the consolidated fund of RMB 11,641 as of December 31, 2017) 312,278 394,672 60,660 Restricted cash 1,000 — — Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts 14,828 2,795 430 Amounts due from related parties 209,034 155,570 23,911 Deferred tax assets 11,158 6,136 943 Other current assets 33,453 88,740 13,639 Long-term investments (including long-term investment of the consolidated fund of RMB 49,029 as of December 31, 2017) 81,168 192,920 29,651 Investment in affiliates 488,263 920,848 141,532 Property and equipment, net 28,804 25,458 3,913 Other non-current 13,776 12,641 1,943 Total assets 1,193,762 1,799,780 276,622 Accrued payroll and welfare expenses 72,212 83,553 12,842 Income tax payable (5,037 ) (2,507 ) (385 ) Amount due to related parties 12,000 — — Amounts due to the Group’s subsidiaries (including amount due to Group’s subsidiaries of the consolidated fund of RMB 19,519 as of December 31, 2017) 125,714 498,557 76,627 Deferred revenue 29,834 33,301 5,118 Other current liabilities 31,079 40,942 6,293 Total liabilities 265,802 653,846 100,495 Years Ended December 31 (Amount in Thousands) 2015 2016 2017 2017 RMB RMB RMB US$ Revenue: Third-party revenues One-time 145,325 1,184 16,521 2,539 Recurring service fees 181,289 56,998 24,275 3,731 Performance-based income 165,972 8,596 2,389 367 Other service fees 9,616 38,881 35,054 5,388 Total third-party revenues 502,202 105,659 78,239 12,025 Related party revenues One-time 122,950 2,887 1,012 156 Recurring service fees 348,870 278,460 306,883 47,167 Performance-based income 53,825 38,414 37,240 5,724 Other service fees 2,103 19,857 23,735 3,648 Total related party revenues 527,748 339,618 368,870 56,695 Total revenues 1,029,950 445,277 447,109 68,720 Less: business taxes and related surcharges (57,714 ) (10,206 ) (2,792 ) (429 ) Net revenues 972,236 435,071 444,317 68,291 Operating cost and expenses (including operating cost and expenses of the consolidated fund of RMB -863 (624,541 ) (452,182 ) (361,765 ) (55,602 ) Other income (including other income of the consolidated fund of RMB 3,667 for year ended December 31, 2017) 39,115 67,038 43,281 6,652 Net income 327,598 24,381 149,703 23,009 Net income attributable to Noah Holding Limited shareholders 326,209 22,122 147,483 22,668 Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities* 402,492 (316,765 ) 426,663 65,562 Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities (293,697 ) 28,995 (372,590 ) (57,251 ) Cash flows provided by financing activities 3,282 14,856 15,680 2,410 * Cash flows provided by operating activities in 2015, 2016 and 2017 include amounts due to the Group’s subsidiaries of RMB161,666, RMB125,714 and RMB 479,138 (US$74). The VIEs contributed an aggregate of 45.9%, 17.3% and 15.7% of the consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively and an aggregate 62.2%, 4.1% and 19.4% of the consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2016 and 2017, the VIEs accounted for an aggregate of 20.1% and 26.8%, respectively, of the consolidated total assets. There are no consolidated assets of the VIEs and their subsidiaries that are collateral for the obligations of the VIEs and their subsidiaries and can only be used to settle the obligations of the VIEs and their subsidiaries, except for the cash held by the consolidated fund of which cash could only be used by the consolidated fund. There are no terms in any arrangements, considering both explicit arrangements and implicit variable interests that require the Company or its subsidiaries to provide financial support to the VIEs. However, if the VIEs ever need financial support, the Company or its subsidiaries may, at its option and subject to statutory limits and restrictions, provide financial support to its VIEs through loans to the shareholder of the VIEs or entrustment loans to the VIEs. Relevant PRC laws and regulations restrict the VIEs from transferring a portion of their net assets, equivalent to the balance of its statutory reserve and its share capital, to the Company in the form of loans and advances or cash dividends. Please refer to Note 16 for disclosure of restricted net assets. (c) Consolidation policy Upon Adoption of ASU No. 2015-02 2016-17 In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-02, The Group early adopted ASU 2015-02 re-evaluated Under ASU 2015-02, In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17, 2016-17”). 2015-02 2016-17 In evaluating whether the investment funds in the legal form of limited partnership the Group managed as general partner are VIEs or not, the Group firstly assessed whether a simple majority or lower threshold of limited partnership interests, excluding interests held by the general partner, parties under common control of the general partner, or parties acting on behalf of the general partner, have substantive kick-out kick-out non-related kick-out non-related The Group started to manage the contractual funds which it manages as fund manager and earns management fee and/or carried interest from second half of 2014. The contractual funds are VIEs as the fund investors do not have substantive kick-out As of December 31, 2016 and 2017, the Group had some variable interests in various investment funds and contractual funds that are VIEs but determined that it was not the primary beneficiary and, therefore, was not consolidating the VIEs. The maximum potential financial statement loss the Group could incur if the investment funds and contractual funds were to default on all of their obligations is (i) the loss of value of the interests in such investments that the Group holds, including equity investments recorded in investment in affiliates as well as debt securities investments recorded in short-term investments and long-term investments in the consolidated balance sheet, and (ii) any management fee and/or carried interest receivables recorded in amounts due from related parties. The following table summarizes the Group’s maximum exposure to loss associated with identified nonconsolidated VIEs in which it holds variable interests as of December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, (Amount in Thousands) 2016 2017 2017 RMB RMB US$ Amounts due from related parties 32,492 36,792 5,655 Investments 508,011 610,386 93,815 Maximum exposure to loss in non-consolidated 540,503 647,178 99,470 The Group has not provided financial support to these nonconsolidated VIEs during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, and had no liabilities, contingent liabilities, or guarantees (implicit or explicit) related to these nonconsolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2016 and 2017. (d) Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from such estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Group’s consolidated financial statements include assumptions used to determine valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, allowance for accounts receivable, allowance for loan losses, fair value measurement of underlying investment portfolios of the funds that the Group invests, assumptions related to the consolidation of entities in which the Group holds variable interests, assumptions related to the valuation of share-based compensation, including estimation of related forfeiture rates and assumption related to valuation of investments. (e) Concentration of Credit Risk The Group is subject to potential significant concentrations of credit risk consisting principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due from related parties, loan receivables and investments. All of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents and a majority of investments are held with financial institutions that Group management believes to be high credit quality. In addition, the Group’s investment policy limits its exposure to concentrations of credit risk. Substantially all revenues were generated within China. There were no financial product providers which accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017. Credit of lending business is controlled by the application of credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. To minimize credit risk, the Group requires collateral in form of right to securities. The Group identifies credit risk on a customer by customer basis. The information is monitored regularly by management. (f) Investments in Affiliates Affiliated companies are entities over which the Group has significant influence, but which it does not control. The Group generally considers an ownership interest of 20% or higher to represent significant influence. Investments in affiliates are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Under this method, the Group’s share of the post-acquisition profits or losses of affiliated companies is recognized in the statements of operations and its shares of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income are recognized in other comprehensive income. Unrealized gains on transactions between the Group and its affiliated companies are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the affiliated companies; unrealized losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. When the Group’s share of losses in an affiliated company equals or exceeds its interest in the affiliated company, the Group does not recognize further losses, unless the Group has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the affiliated company. An impairment loss is recorded when there has been a loss in value of the investment that is other than temporary. The Group has not recorded any impairment losses in any of the periods reported. The Group also considers it has significant influence over the funds that it serves as general partner or fund manager. For funds that the Group is not deemed the primary beneficiary of these funds, the equity method of accounting is accordingly used for investments by the Group in these funds. In addition, the investee funds meet the definition of an Investment Company and are required to report their investment assets at fair value. The Group records its equity pick-up (g) Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Group records certain of its financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value reflects the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Group considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. The Group applies a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is as follows: Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical asset or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Level 3 applies to asset or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. (h) Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and demand deposits, which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use, and which have original maturities of three months or less when purchased. As of December 31, 2017, cash and cash equivalents of RMB 11,641 was held by the consolidated fund (see note 2(b)). Cash and cash equivalents held by the consolidated fund represents cash that, although not legally restricted, is not available to general liquidity needs of the Company as the use of such funds is generally limited to the investment activities of the consolidated fund. (i) Restricted Cash The Group’s restricted cash primarily represents cash deposits required by China Insurance Regulatory Commission for entities engaging in insurance agency or brokering activities in China. Such cash cannot be withdrawn without the written approval of the China Insurance Regulatory Commission. The Company sold the subsidiary which was doing the insurance agency business in 2017 and there was no restricted cash balance as of December 31, 2017 as a result. The Group early adopted ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Restricted Cash. According to this guidance, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The Company applied the guidance on a retrospective basis and have applied the changes to the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. (j) Investments The Group invests in debt securities and equity securities and accounts for the investments based on the nature of the products invested, and the Group’s intent and ability to hold the investments to maturity. The Group’s investments in debt securities include marketable bond fund securities, trust products, asset management plans, contractual funds and real estate funds those have a stated maturity and normally pay a prospective fixed rate of return and secondary market equity fund products, the underlying assets of which are portfolios of equity investments in listed enterprises. The Group classifies the investments in debt securities as held-to-maturity Held-to-maturity held-to-maturity available-for-sale, The Group records investments in private equity funds under the cost method when they do not qualify for the equity method. Gains or losses are realized when such investments are sold. The Group reviews its investments except for those classified as trading securities for other-than-temporary impairment based on the specific identification method and considers available quantitative and qualitative evidence in evaluating potential impairment. If the cost of an investment exceeds the investment’s fair value, the Group considers, among other factors, general market conditions, government economic plans, the duration and the extent to which the fair value of the investment is less than cost and the Group’s intent and ability to hold the investment to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The Group recognizes other-than-temporary impairment in earnings if it has the intent to sell the debt security or if it is more-likely-than-not If the investment’s fair value is less than the cost of an investment and the Group determines the impairment to be other-than-temporary, the Group recognizes an impairment loss based on the fair value of the investment. The Group has not recorded an other-than-temporary impairment. (k) Non-controlling A non-controlling Non-controlling non-controlling non-controlling non-controlling The following schedule shows the effects of changes in the Company’s ownership interest in less than wholly owned subsidiaries on equity attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders: Years Ended December 31, (Amount in Thousands) 2015 2016 2017 2017 RMB RMB RMB US$ Net income attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders 535,825 643,829 762,923 117,261 Transfers from (to) the non-controlling Increase (decrease) in Noah’s equity by partial disposal (acquisition) of subsidiaries 29,076 151,990 30 5 Net transfers from (to) non-controlling 29,076 151,990 30 5 Change from net income attributable to Noah and transfers from non-controlling 564,901 795,819 762,953 117,266 (l) Property and Equipment, net Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, and is depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Estimated Useful Lives in Years Leasehold improvements Shorter of the lease term or expected useful life Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 3—5 years Motor Vehicles 5 years Software 2—5 years Building 30 years Gains and losses from the disposal of property and equipment are included in income from operations. (m) Revenue Recognition The Group derives revenue primarily from one-time The Group recognizes revenues when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, service has been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Prior to a client’s purchase of a financial product, the Group provides the client with a wide spectrum of consultation services, including product selection, review, risk profile assessment and evaluation and recommendation for the client. Revenues are recorded, net of sales related taxes and surcharges. One-time The Group enters into one-time one-time The Group also earns one-time “one-time Recurring Service Fees Recurring service fees depend on the types of financial products the Company distributes and/or manages and are calculated as either (i) a percentage of the total capital commitments of investments made by the investors or (ii) as a percentage of the fair value of the total investment in the financial products, calculated daily. As the Group provides these services throughout the contract term, for either method of calculation, revenue is recognized on a daily basis over the contract term, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Recurring service agreements do not include rights of return, credits or discounts, rebates, price protection or other similar privileges. Multiple Element Arrangements The Group enters into multiple element arrangements when a product provider or underlying corporate borrower engages it to provide both distributing financial products and recurring services. The Group also provides both distributing financial products and recurring services to funds that it serves as general partner or fund manager. The Group allocates arrangement consideration in multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements at the inception of an arrangement to all deliverables based on the relative selling price in accordance with the selling price hierarchy, which includes: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; (ii) third-party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. VSOE. The Group determines VSOE based on its historical pricing and discounting practices for the specific service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, the Group requires that a substantial majority of the selling prices for these services fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. The Group historically had provided distributing financial products services on a stand-alone basis but the volume of such services has been significantly decreased in recent years. Therefore VSOE is no longer available for its distributing financial products services. The Group has not sold its recurring services on a stand-alone basis, no VSOE exists for recurring services. TPE. When VSOE cannot be established for deliverables in multiple element arrangements, the Group applies judgment with respect to whether it can establish a selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. Generally, the Group’s products and services contain certain level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services with similar functionality cannot be obtained. Furthermore, the Group is unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services’ selling prices are on a stand-alone basis. As a result, the Group has not been able to establish selling price based on TPE. BESP. When it is unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, the Group uses BESP in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Group would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis. The Group determines BESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices it charged for similar offerings, market conditions, specification of the services rendered, product lifecycles, and pricing strategies and practices. The Group has used BESP to allocate the selling price of distributing financial products service and recurring services under these multiple element arrangements. Revenue for the respective units of accounting is also recognized in the same manner as described above. Performance-based Income In a typical arrangement in which the Group serves as fund manager, and in some cases in which the Company serves as distributor, except for secondary market equity fund products, the Group is entitled to a performance-based fee based on the extent by which the fund’s investment performance exceeds a certain threshold at the end of the contract term. Such performance-based fee is typically calculated and distributed at the end of the contract term when the cumulative return of the fund can be determined, and is not subject to clawback provisions. The Group does not record any performance-based income until the end of the contract term. Beginning in 2015, for certain secondary market products for which the Group provides recurring services, including both the funds for which the Group serves as the distribution channel and the funds for which the Group acts as the fund manager, the performance-based income may also include a variable performance fee contingent upon the performance of the underlying investment in the measurement period, typically calculated at the end of the measurement period and settled subsequently. Such performance-based fee is not subject to clawback provisions and is recognized when the contingent criteria are met at the end of the measurement period. Other Service Fees Other service fees constitutes less than 10% of total revenue of the Group. The Group mainly derived other service fees from online wealth management, lending services, payment technology services and investor education services. The Group offers lending services. Interest income from such services is recognized monthly in accordance with their contractual terms and recorded as pa |