Inventory consists of live coral, fresh and saltwater fish, invertebrates and other aquarium supplies.
During the two years ended March 31, 2013, the Company entered into Convertible Promissory Notes which refinance non-interest bearing advances. The Convertible Promissory Notes entered into had the following terms:
All principal along with accrued interest is payable on the maturity date. The notes are convertible into common stock at the option of the holder.
There were no convertible notes payable outstanding as of March 31, 2012.
The Company evaluated the terms of these notes in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 – 40,Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and determined that the underlying common stock is indexed to the Company’s common stock. The Company determined that the conversion features did not meet the definition of a liability and therefore did not bifurcate the conversion features and account for them as a separate derivative liabilities. The Company evaluated the conversion features for a beneficial conversion feature. The effective conversion price was compared to the market price on the date of the notes and was deemed to be less than the market value of underlying common stock at the inception of the note. Therefore, the Company recognized beneficial conversion features in the amounts of $69,586, $18,650, $94,515, $117,775, $101,333 and $43,575 on the date the notes were signed. The beneficial conversion features were recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and a discount to the Convertible Notes Payable. The discounts to the Convertible Notes Payable will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the respective notes.
On August 1, 2012, the holder of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $69,586 elected to convert the note into 6,958,598 shares of common stock. These shares were issued to Glendive Investments, a significant shareholder of the Company. As a result of the conversion on August 1, 2012, the remaining unamortized discount of $69,586 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
On August 2, 2012, the holders of Convertible Promissory Notes in the original amount of $18,650 elected to convert principal in the amount of $11,250 into 1,125,000 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $9,270 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
On August 30, 2012, the holder of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $18,650 elected to convert principal in the amount of $4,300 into 430,000 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $3,536 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
On December 17, 2012, the holders of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $94,515 elected to convert principal in the amount of $90,000 into 1,800,000 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $75,594 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
On February 4, 2013, the holder of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $18,650 elected to convert principal in the amount of $3,100 and unpaid accrued interest in the amount of $1,286 into 438,646 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $1,697 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
On February 26, 2013, the holder of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $117,775 elected to convert principal in the amount of $22,000 into 550,000 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $18,692.29 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
On March 6, 2013, the holder of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $117,775 elected to convert principal in the amount of $22,500 into 562,500 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $19,030 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Notes Payable
As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, related party transactions totaled $93,195 and $31,299. Transactions consist solely of notes payable to Mr. Foxwell for amounts advanced to Father Fish for operating cash flow.
Other
The officer and director of the Company is involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities that become available. Our sole officer and director may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.
The above terms and amounts are not necessarily indicative of the terms and amounts that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent parties.
10. INCOME TAXES
At March 31, 2013, the Company has available for federal income tax purposes net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of $1,835,414 at the statutory tax rate of 34% that may be used to offset future taxable income. The NOLs approximating $624,000 begin expiring in 2031. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements since the Company believes that the realization of its net deferred tax asset of approximately $624,000 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by the full valuation allowance.
Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability.
- 19 -
Components of deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Year ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate | | $ | 353,700 | | $ | 155,500 | |
State income tax benefit, net of federal benefit. | | | 31,600 | | | 13,900 | |
| | | 385,300 | | | 169,400 | |
Non-deductible stock based compensation | | | (165,300 | ) | | (106,500 | ) |
Valuation allowance | | | (220,000 | ) | | (62,900 | ) |
Income tax expense | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
The Company did not have any temporary differences for the years ended March 31, 2013 or 2012. The deferred tax asset generated by the loss carry-forward has been fully reserved.
| | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Deferred tax asset, generated from net operating loss at statutory rates | | $ | 624,000 | | $ | 195,000 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (624,000 | ) | | (195,000 | ) |
| | $ | — | | $ | — | |
11. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Upon formation, the Company was authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock and 100,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, there was no preferred stock issued or outstanding. There were 12,519,828 shares and 575,000 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
On March 5, 2012, the Company approved a 2012 Stock Plan for Directors, Officers and Consultants (“Plan”) for the issuance of up to 6,000,000 shares of common stock or equivalent value, as determined. The Plan provides eligible employees and consultants the opportunity to participate in the enhancement of shareholder value by the grants of warrants, options, restricted common or convertible preferred stock if, as and when preferred stock is authorized by the Company and its shareholders, unrestricted common or convertible preferred stock and other awards under this Plan and to have their bonuses and/or consulting fees payable in warrants, restricted common or convertible preferred stock, unrestricted common or convertible preferred stock and other awards, or any combination thereof.
On March 7, 2012, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock to an individual for consulting services. The shares were valued at $355,000 based on the market value of the stock on the date of issuance.
On April 13, 2012, the Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock to a third party for services. The shares were valued at $200,000 based on the market value of the stock on the date of issuance.
On April 30, 2012, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock to a third party for services. The shares were valued at $216,000 based on the market value of the stock on the date of issuance.
On May 31, 2012, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock to a third party for services. The shares were valued at $126,000 based on the market value of the stock on the date of issuance.
On August 1, 2012, the Company issued 6,958,596 shares of common stock as a result of conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in the amount of $69,586.
On August 2, 2012, the Company issued 1,125,000 shares of common stock as a result of the conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in the amount of $11,250.
On August 30, 2012, the Company issued 430,000 shares of common stock as a result of the conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in the amount of $4,300.
On December 17, 2012, the Company issued 1,800,000 shares of common stock as a result of the conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in the amount of $90,000.
- 20 -
On February 4, 2013, the Company issued 438,646 shares of common stock as a result of the conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in the amount of $4,386.
On February 26, 2013, the Company issued 550,000 shares of common stock as a result of the conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in the amount of $22,000.
On March 6, 2013, the Company issued 562,500 shares of common stock as a result of the conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in amount of $22,500.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time Rainbow Coral Corp. may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against Rainbow Coral Corp. Management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on Rainbow Coral Corp.’s financial position or results of operations.
Operating Lease Obligations
We rent office space on a month-to-month basis. In addition, our CEO utilizes office space in Houston, Texas on an as-needed basis through a management agreement with a professional services corporation.
We lease a combined retail and warehouse location in Venice, Florida. The space is approximately 3,000 square feet and is adequate for our needs. The lease term is one year. The rent is approximately $800 per month.
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued. The following events and transactions are reportable subsequent events requiring disclosure:
On February 1, 2013, we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with TheraKine Ltd. (“TheraKine”) in order to explore potential business opportunities to exploit TheraKine’s novel drug delivery technologies. TheraKine is the developer of a revolutionary, sustained-release drug delivery platform that could soon make local delivery of biologic agents and small molecules safer, more effective and more convenient than ever before. Under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement, we have committed to fund $55,000 of the cash flow requirements of the Joint Venture by making weekly payments of $6,875. In addition, we will provide management and marketing services to assist with bringing the platform to market and help identify potential target users of the platform. As of March 31, 2013, we had not provided any funding to TheraKine. During June and July 2013, we funded $20,625 under the Joint Venture Agreement with TheraKine. We expect to continue to fund this joint venture.
On April 10, 2013, the holder of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $117,775 elected to convert principal in the amount of $25,000 into 625,000 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $20,688.96 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
On April 11, 2013, the holder of the Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $117,775 elected to convert principal in the amount of $48,275 and unpaid accrued interest in the amount of $1,725 into 1,250,000 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, the remaining unamortized discount related to the converted principal in the amount of $39,950 was immediately amortized to interest expense.
- 21 -
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Changes in
On December 27, 2012, Peter Messineo, CPA declined to sit for re-election as the Company’s independent registered public accountant due to changes in his firm. On December 17, 2012, Peter Messineo joined the firm known as DKM Certified Public Accountants.
On December 27, 2012, the Company engaged DKM Certified Public Accountants as its registered independent public accountant.
On June 28, 2013, the Company dismissed DKM Certified Public Accountants as its registered independent public accountant. The Company engaged Messineo & Co. CPAs LLC as its registered independent public accountant on June 28, 2013. The decision to change independent registered public accounting firms was made and approved by our Board of Directors.
The report of Peter Messineo CPA on the financial statements of the Registrant for the years ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles except that the report contained an explanatory paragraph stating that there was substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Disagreements with
There were no disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Limitations on Systems of Controls
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses identified in our evaluation, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:
- 22 -
| | |
| · | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; |
| | |
| · | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and |
| | |
| · | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
As of March 31, 2013, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.
The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: lack of a functioning audit committee; lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors; inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; ineffective oversight of the entity’s financial reporting and internal control by management and those charged with governance; and, management is dominated by a single individual. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of March 31, 2013.
Management believes that the material weaknesses did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.
Management’s Remediation Initiatives
In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:
We will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us. And, we plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when funds are available to us.
Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.
We will work as quickly as possible to implement these initiatives; however, the lack of adequate working capital and positive cash flow from operations will likely slow this implementation.
- 23 -
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Officers and Directors
Our sole officer and director will serve until his successor is elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serve until his successor(s) is duly elected and qualified, or until he is removed from office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation committees.
The name, address, age and position of our president, secretary/treasurer, and director is set forth below:
| | | | |
NAME AND ADDRESS | | AGE | | POSITION(S) |
| | | | |
Patrick Brown | | 45 | | President, Secretary/Treasurer |
495 Grand Blvd., Suite 206 | | | | Chief Executive Officer |
Miramar Beach, FL 32550 | | | | Principal Financial Officer and Sole Director |
Lou Foxwell was the sole officer and director at the inception of the Company until October 14, 2011.
On October 14, 2011, our Board of Directors appointed Patrick Brown to serve as CEO, President and a member of the Board of Directors.
Additionally, on October 14, 2011, Mr. Louis Foxwell resigned as our CEO, President and Director. He will remain as the President of our Father Fish subsidiary and will continue to manage that segment of our business. Mr. Foxwell’s resignation was not the result of a disagreement with the Company.
Business Experience
PATRICK BROWN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SOLE DIRECTOR
Over the past two decades, Mr. Brown has cultivated a wealth of knowledge and expertise as an executive and financial consultant for international clean-energy innovators in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to his work assessing the prospects and feasibility of clean-energy projects, Mr. Brown is highly experienced in securing financing for new technologies from government and venture capital sources. Prior to joining the Company Mr. Brown was the President of West Coast Financial Services, Ltd. which provided boutique financial consulting services for private and pre-listed public companies. From 2009 – 2011, he worked for MNP, LLP, a Canadian accounting firm, where he maintained a client base in entertainment, renewable energy and emerging markets. From 2005 to 2009, he worked for RSM Richter, LLP where he branded the firm’s emerging markets and renewable energy practice specialty. He is trained as a Canadian Chartered Accountant, and holds a diploma from the British Columbia Institute of Technology in Financial Management with an option in Taxation. Mr. Brown also serves as Chief Executive Office and sole director of On the Move Systems, Inc., which provides personal and business safety and protection products.
Mr. Brown does not hold and has not held over the past five years any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers or persons nominated to become executive officers or directors.
- 24 -
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
During the past ten (10) years, none of our directors, persons nominated to become directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons was involved in any of the legal proceedings listen in Item 401 (f) of Regulation S-K.
Arrangements
There are no arrangements or understandings between an executive officer, director or nominee and any other person pursuant to which he was or is to be selected as an executive officer or director.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Mr. Brown is being paid $5,500 per month. We have no employment agreement with Mr. Brown. He receives no other compensation other than the salary described above.
Subsequent to the acquisition of the assets of Father Fish, Mr. Foxwell is being compensated at a rate of $2,500 per month.
The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named officers and directors for all services rendered in all capacities to us during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and principal position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Stock Awards ($) | | Option Awards ($) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | | All Other Compen- sation | | Total ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Patrick Brown, CEO | | 2013 2012 | | $ 66,000 $ 27,500 | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ 66,000 $ 27,500 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lou Foxwell, former CEO and current president of Father Fish | | 2013 2012 | | $ 25,000 $ 22,500 | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ — $ — | | $ 25,000 $ 22,500 |
There are no other stock option plans, retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our officers and directors other than as described herein.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
Our principal executive officers and directors do not have any earned or unearned equity awards outstanding as of the end of our fiscal year.
On March 1, 2012, the Company approved its 2012 Stock Plan for Directors, Officers and Consultants (“2012 Stock Plan”). The 2012 Stock Plan authorized the issuance of 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for directors, officers, and employees (including consultants meeting the definition of “employee” under Rule 405 promulgated under the Securities Act). Pursuant to the 2012 Stock Plan, the Company registered 6,000,000 shares of its stock with the SEC on Form S-8 on March 5, 2012.
The Company has not granted any awards or options to our principal executive officers or directors pursuant to the 2012 Stock Plan.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
We do not compensate our directors for their services in their capacity as directors nor do we have any agreements to do so.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
We do not currently have any independent directors and we do not anticipate appointing additional directors in the foreseeable future. If we engage further directors and officers, however, we plan to develop a definition of independence.
- 25 -
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth certain information as of June 30, 2012, with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock by (i) each person known to us who owns beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, (ii) each of our Directors, (iii) each of our Executive Officers, and (iv) all of our Executive Officers and Directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each stockholder has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. As of June 30, 2013, there were 595,000 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding.
| | | | | | | | | |
Name and address of beneficial owner | | Relationship to Registrant | | Number of Shares of Common Stock | | Percentage of Common Stock (1) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Glendive Investments Al. Jerozolimskie 56C Warsaw, 00-803 Poland | | Shareholder | | | 7,408,598 | | | 50.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Patrick Brown | | Sole director and CEO | | | 0 | | | 0.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
All officers and directors as a group (total of 1) | | | | | 0 | | | 0.0 | % |
_________
(1) Under Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on March 31, 2012.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | |
Plan category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance (c) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1) | | | 6,000,000 | | | $0.0001 | | | 5,895,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 6,000,000 | | | $0.0001 | | | 5,895,000 | |
_________
(1) On March 1, 2012, the Company approved its 2012 Stock Plan for Directors, Officers and Consultants (“2012 Stock Plan”). The 2012 Stock Plan authorized the issuance of 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for directors, officers, and employees (including consultants meeting the definition of “employee” under Rule 405 promulgated under the Securities Act). Pursuant to the 2012 Stock Plan, the Company registered 6,000,000 shares of its stock with the SEC on Form S-8 on March 5, 2012. The 2012 Stock Plan does not state an exercise price, and therefore, the par value of the Company’s common stock has been used.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
None.
- 26 -
Item 14. Fees and Services.
The following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company by its independent accountants, Peter Messineo, CPA, for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
| | | | | | |
Fee Category | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | | | |
Audit Fees | | $ | 6,350 | | $ | 4,100 |
| | | | | | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | |
Total Fees | | $ | 6,350 | | $ | 4,100 |
Notes to the Accountants Fees Table:
| |
(1) | Consists of fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” |
| |
(2) | Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax related services. |
| |
(3) | Consists of fees for products and services provided by our principal accountants, other than the services reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees” above. |
As part of its responsibility for oversight of the independent registered public accountants, the Board has established a pre-approval policy for engaging audit and permitted non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accountants. In accordance with this policy, each type of audit, audit-related, tax and other permitted service to be provided by the independent auditors is specifically described and each such service, together with a fee level or budgeted amount for such service, is pre-approved by the Board. All of the services provided by Peter Messineo, CPA described above were approved by our Board.
The Company’s principal accountant did not engage any other persons or firms other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Exhibit Number Description
| |
2.1 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2011, by and among Rainbow Coral Corporation and Father Fish Aquarium, Inc. (1) |
| |
2.2 | Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2011 by and among Father Fish Aquarium, Inc. and Father Fish Aquarium, LLC. (1) |
| |
3.1(a) | Articles of Incorporation of Rainbow Coral Corp. (2) |
| |
3.1(b) | Articles of Amendment of Rainbow Coral Corp. (1) |
| |
3.1(c) | Articles of Amendment of Rainbow Coral Corp. (3) |
| |
3.2(a) | Bylaws of Rainbow Coral Corp. (2) |
| |
- 27 -
| |
10.1 | Note from Rainbow Coral Corp. to Louis Foxwell (1) |
| |
21 * | Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
| |
31.1 * | Section 302 Certification |
| |
32.1 * | Section 906 Certification |
| |
101 ** | XBRL Interactive Data |
* Filed or furnished herewith
** To be submitted by amendment
(1) Incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with our Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2011
(2) Incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-1
(3) Filed on July 17, 2012 as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
Date: July 16, 2013 | Rainbow Coral Corp. |
| |
| By: /s/ Patrick Brown |
| Patrick Brown |
| Chairman of the Board |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| Principal Financial Officer |
- 28 -