GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “K2M,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our,” refer to K2M Group Holdings, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries. We are a global medical device provider of complex spine and minimally invasive solutions focused on achieving three-dimensional Total Body Balance TM . Since our inception, we have designed, developed and commercialized innovative complex spine and minimally invasive spine technologies and techniques used by spine surgeons to treat some of the most complicated spinal pathologies. K2M has leveraged these core competencies into Balance ACS™, a platform of products, services and research to help surgeons achieve three-dimensional spinal balance across the axial, coronal and sagittal planes, with the goal of supporting the full continuum of care to facilitate quality patient outcomes. The Balance ACS platform, in combination with our technologies, techniques and leadership in the 3D-printing of spinal devices, enable us to compete favorably in the global spinal surgery market. Unaudited Interim Results The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the condensed consolidated statements of operations, the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , the condensed consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2017 , and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are unaudited. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis of accounting as the annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of future results. All information as of June 30, 2017 and for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2017 and 2016 within these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements is unaudited. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Net Loss per Share Basic net loss per common share is determined by dividing the net loss allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented, without consideration of common stock equivalents. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding for the period. The treasury stock method is used to determine the dilutive effect of our stock option grants. The if-converted method is used to determine the dilutive effect of the convertible senior notes. The weighted average shares used to calculate both basic and diluted loss per share are the same because common stock equivalents were excluded in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. Although included in our outstanding shares total as of June 30, 2017 , shares of restricted stock are contingently issuable until their restrictions lapse and have been excluded from the weighted average shares outstanding. Foreign Currency Translation and Other Comprehensive Loss Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, which is also the functional currency of our domestic entities, while the functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries are the British Pound, Euro and Swiss Franc. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rate for the period. Net gains and losses resulting from the translation of foreign financial statements are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Net foreign currency gains or losses resulting from transactions in currencies other than the functional currencies are included in other expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations. Recent Accounting Pronouncements We are currently an EGC pursuant to the provisions of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012. Based on the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of our second fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2017, we will lose our status as an EGC as of December 31, 2017. Once we cease to be an EGC, we will no longer be able to take advantage of certain exemptions and relief from various reporting requirements that were allowed when we were an EGC. Accounting Pronouncements that we will adopt as of December 31, 2017: In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory , which requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. For public entities, the guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments in this guidance will be applied prospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting , which is intended to improve employee share-based payment accounting for companies that issue share-based awards to their employees. This guidance simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including consequences of income tax award, classification as either equity or liability, treatment of forfeitures, and classification on statement of cash flows. The recognition, measurement and reporting for share-based payments will be affected by this new guidance. For public entities, the guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted in any annual or interim period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance, but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of modification accounting: provides guidance about which changes to the terms of a share-based payment award should be accounted for as a modification. A change to an award should be accounted for as a modification unless the fair value of the modified award is the same as the original award, inputs to the valuation technique used to value the award does not change, the vesting conditions do not change, and the classification as an equity or liability instrument do not change. This guidance should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after date of the adoption. For public entities, the guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted in any annual or interim period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance, but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Accounting Pronouncements we will adopt in 2018 and later periods: Revenue Recognition Between May 2014 and March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB issued several updates related to Topic 606 - Revenue Recognition for which we are still evaluating the impact: In May 2014, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers was first to amend the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. It provides a single comprehensive model for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers and will supersede most existing revenue recognition guidance. The amendment is based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. This new guidance requires disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows from contracts with customers. In March 2016, ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), was issued to address principal versus agent considerations, reporting revenue gross versus net in the new revenue recognition standard. The guidance clarifies how an entity should evaluate the unit of accounting to determine whether it is a specified good or service and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. In April 2016, ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing , was issued and included final amendments to clarify the guidance on identifying performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property (“IP”). The amendment allows entities to disregard goods or services that are immaterial in the context of a contract, assess whether the performance obligation is separately identifiable and whether the shipping and handling activities are a promised service in a contract. This guidance also clarifies how an entity should evaluate the nature of its promise in granting an IP license and when a promised good or service is distinct within the context of a contract. In May 2016, ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, was issued and clarifies that for a contract to be considered completed the entity should evaluate the collectability threshold or probability of collecting revenue. It provides that the fair value of noncash consideration such as equity should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price and any subsequent changes must be recorded as a gain or loss, not as revenue. In addition, the entity has the option to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes such as sales tax, value-added tax and excise tax in lieu of evaluating such taxes they collect in all jurisdictions to determine whether a tax is levied to the entity or the customer. In December 2016, ASU 2016-20, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Technical Corrections and Improvements , was issued to make minor corrections or minor improvements to the codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. It affects narrow aspects of the revenue from contracts with customers’ guidance, including its scope, disclosure of remaining and prior-period performance obligation, contract modifications, contract asset vs receivables, refund liability and advertising costs. For public companies, the guidance included in these updates will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The guidance may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of the initial application. Presently we and our advisors are reviewing a representative sample of existing revenue contracts with customers in relation to the requirements of this guidance to evaluate the impact it may have on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We also continue to assess the impact of the new standard on our current policies, procedures and disclosures related to revenue recognition. We expect to complete our evaluation in the third quarter of 2017. Other Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The revised guidance must be applied on a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Public companies will be required to comply with the guidance in 2019, and interim periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. We are presently evaluating the impact of this guidance. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero coupon bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, distributions from certain equity method investors and beneficial interests obtained in a financial asset securitization. It also provides clarifications related to separately identifiable cash-flows and application of the predominance principle based on evaluating the source and nature of the underlying cash flows when determining whether it is a financing, investing, operating or a combination of cash flow classifications. For public entities the guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted in any annual or interim period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance, but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. We are currently assessing the impact of this guidance. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. These amounts should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This amendment does not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. For public entities the guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted in any annual or interim period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance, but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. We are currently assessing the impact of this guidance. In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which no longer requires an entity to measure a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value to the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill. Instead, any goodwill impairment charge will be recognized as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. In addition, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The amendment does not affect the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. For public entities, the guidance will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments in this guidance should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted for goodwill impairment tests with measurement dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently assessing the impact of this guidance. |