Eureka Financial 10-Q 2015 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission file number: 0-54238

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	27-3671639
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3455 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania	15213
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(412) 681-8400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of August 13, 2015, there were 1,207,408 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP.

Table of Contents

		Page Number
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1:	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited)		3
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)		5
	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 (unaudited)		6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)		7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		8
Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		32
Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		40
Item 4:	Controls and Procedures		40
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1:	Legal Proceedings		40
Item 1A:	Risk Factors		40
Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		40
Item 3:	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		41
Item 4:	Mine Safety Disclosures		41
Item 5:	Other Information		41
Item 6:	Exhibits		41
SIGNATURES			42

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

	June 30, 2015			September 30, 2014
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	848,454		$	698,899
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		7,434,313			8,941,044
Cash and cash equivalents		8,282,767			9,639,943
Investment securities available for sale		6,428,700			8,403,565
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $2,749,736 and $2,740,940, respectively)		2,768,553			2,772,470
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		3,374			5,585
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost		131,900			302,500
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,431,038 and $1,361,038, respectively		133,129,811			128,030,483
Premises and equipment, net		1,034,296			1,073,073
Deferred tax asset, net		893,842			832,735
Other real estate owned		539,735			—
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		1,412,606			1,126,697
Total Assets	$	154,625,584		$	152,187,051
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	5,146,561		$	5,639,321
Interest bearing		123,965,426			122,221,240
Total deposits		129,111,987			127,860,561
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		710,365			633,159
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,384,694			999,554
Total Liabilities		131,207,046			129,493,274
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,207,408 shares outstanding at June 30, 2015; 1,213,986 shares outstanding at September 30, 2014		12,074			12,140
Paid-in capital		10,030,616			10,025,400
Retained earnings - substantially restricted		13,839,138			13,179,662
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(105,354	)		(121,279	)
Unearned ESOP shares		(357,936	)		(402,146	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		23,418,538			22,693,777
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	154,625,584		$	152,187,051

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Interest Income
Loans, including fees	$	1,640,846	$	1,627,134	$	4,918,693	$	4,853,910
Investment securities and other interest-earning assets:
Taxable		53,206		58,673		203,534		148,684
Tax exempt		20,440		22,198		64,875		67,308
Mortgage-backed securities		59		90		217		359
Total Interest Income		1,714,551		1,708,095		5,187,319		5,070,261
Interest Expense
Deposits		211,091		205,465		622,967		653,207
FHLB advances		—		3,531		—		10,147
Total Interest Expense		211,091		208,996		622,967		663,354
Net Interest Income		1,503,460		1,499,099		4,564,352		4,406,907
Provision for Loan Losses		10,000		25,000		70,000		50,000
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		1,493,460		1,474,099		4,494,352		4,356,907
Non-Interest Income
Fees on deposit accounts		10,172		8,452		28,248		24,198
Other income		9,978		37,814		50,416		62,734
Total Non-Interest Income		20,150		46,266		78,664		86,932
Non-Interest Expense
Salaries and benefits		574,313		547,466		1,675,361		1,609,654
Occupancy		85,408		84,694		267,485		264,398
Data processing		64,377		68,708		191,990		202,397
Professional fees		76,252		90,665		274,523		250,044
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums		18,150		18,150		54,450		51,700
Other		118,710		102,271		373,711		351,627
Total Non-Interest Expenses		937,210		911,954		2,837,520		2,729,820
Income Before Income Tax Provision		576,400		608,411		1,735,496		1,714,019
Income Tax Provision		185,248		206,017		591,914		599,878
Net Income	$	391,152	$	402,394	$	1,143,582	$	1,114,141
Earnings per Common Share - Basic	$	0.34	$	0.34	$	0.98	$	0.93
Earnings per Common Share - Diluted		0.34		0.34		0.98		0.93

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net income	$	391,152		$	402,394		$	1,143,582		$	1,114,141
Other comprehensive income:
(Increase) decrease in unrealized losses on available for sale securities		(117,558	)		140,279			24,098			327,443
Income tax effect		39,990			(47,695	)		(8,173	)		(111,330	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:		(77,568	)		92,584			15,925			216,113
Total comprehensive income	$	313,584		$	494,978		$	1,159,507		$	1,330,254

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015

(unaudited)

	Common Stock Shares Outstanding			Common Stock			Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss)			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total
Balance, September 30, 2014		1,213,986		$	12,140		$	10,025,400		$	13,179,662		$	(121,279	)	$	(402,146	)	$	22,693,777
Net income		—			—			—			1,143,582			—			—			1,143,582
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			15,925			—			15,925
Compensation expense related to restricted stock		���			—			64,397			—			—			—			64,397
Compensation expense related to stock options		—			—			15,350			—			—			—			15,350
Compensation expense on ESOP		—			—			50,187			—			—			44,210			94,397
Retirement of common stock		(6,578	)		(66	)		(124,718	)		—			—			—			(124,784	)
Dividends on common stock ($.40 per share)		—			—			—			(484,106	)		—			—			(484,106	)
Balance, June 30, 2015		1,207,408		$	12,074		$	10,030,616		$	13,839,138		$	(105,354	)	$	(357,936	)	$	23,418,538

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,143,582		$	1,114,141
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation of premises and equipment		104,886			112,449
Provision for loan losses		70,000			50,000
Net accretion/amortization of discounts and premiums on securities and unamortized loan fees and costs		(1,875	)		1,050
Compensation expense for ESOP, restricted stock, and stock options		174,144			152,504
Increase in deferred tax expense		(69,280	)		(18,140	)
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		28,944			29,801
Decrease in prepaid income tax		18,394			—
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable		23,965			(1,646	)
Decrease in retirement fund obligation		(80,979	)		(33,957	)
Other, net		106,804			(205,121	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,518,585			1,201,081
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from maturities and redemptions of investment securities available for sale		3,500,000			1,500,000
Proceeds from maturities and redemptions of investment securities held to maturity		5,000			5,000
Purchase of investment securities available for sale		(1,500,000	)		(1,750,000	)
Net paydowns in mortgage-backed securities available for sale		1,966			2,294
Purchase of FHLB stock		(52,000	)		(361,800	)
Redemption of FHLB stock		222,600			100,000
Net decrease (increase) in loans		894,459			(1,263,194	)
Commercial leases purchased		(6,600,761	)		(3,957,242	)
Premises and equipment expenditures		(66,109	)		(47,356	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(3,594,845	)		(5,772,298	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposit accounts		1,251,426			5,065,308
Proceeds from FHLB borrowings		—			8,000,000
Repayment of FHLB borrowings		—			(3,500,000	)
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		77,206			160,937
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(124,784	)		(160,827	)
Payment of dividends		(484,764	)		(350,663	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		719,084			9,214,755
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,357,176	)		4,643,538
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		9,639,943			7,181,069
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	8,282,767		$	11,824,607
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest paid	$	599,002		$	667,618
Income taxes paid	$	642,000		$	787,000
Noncash investing transaction:
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned	$	536,974		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies

Eureka Financial Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Eureka Bank (the “Bank”), provide a variety of financial services to individuals and corporate customers through its main office and branch located in Southwestern Pennsylvania. The Bank’s primary deposit products are interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposits. Its primary lending products are single-family residential loans, multi-family and commercial real estate loans, and commercial leases and loans.

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim information. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the interim periods include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary, in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect Eureka Financial Corp.’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. Additionally, these consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to the SEC’s Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and therefore do not include all information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended September 30, 2014, as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2014.

The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, valuation of deferred tax assets and other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities. The results of operations for the interim quarterly or year to date periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by weighted-average shares outstanding. Unallocated shares held by the Bank’s employee stock ownership plan are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by weighted-average shares outstanding plus potential common stock resulting from dilutive stock options. Common shares that have been repurchased are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations.

8

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and dilutive earnings per share computations for net income for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Weighted average common shares		1,207,426			1,247,236			1,210,664			1,251,337
Average unearned ESOP shares		(34,126	)		(40,236	)		(35,658	)		(41,768	)
Average unearned restricted shares		(12,305	)		(15,437	)		(11,631	)		(16,741	)
Weighted average common shares and stock equivalents used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share		1,160,995			1,191,563			1,163,375			1,192,828
Additional common stock equivalents (restricted shares) used to calculate diluted earnings per share		1,564			938			312			—
Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share		3,390			2,425			1,463			1,797
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share		1,165,949			1,194,926			1,165,150			1,194,625
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.34		$	0.34		$	0.98		$	0.93

Options to purchase 64,907 shares of common stock at a price of $15.24 per share were outstanding at both June 30, 2015 and 2014. All of the options were considered dilutive based on the weighted average market value exceeding the weighted average stock price.

Options to purchase 3,818 shares of common stock at a price of $21.52 per share were outstanding at June 30, 2015. No shares were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because doing so would have been anti-dilutive as the weighted average exercise price was in excess of the weighted average market value.

9

Reclassifications

Certain comparative amounts from the prior year period have been reclassified to conform to current period classifications. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income and stockholders’ equity.

Note 2 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component net of tax for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

	Unrealized Losses on Available for Sale Securities				Unrealized Losses on Available for Sale Securities
Balance as of March 31, 2015	$	(27,786	)	Balance as of September 30, 2014	$	(121,279	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification		(77,568	)	Other comprehensive income before reclassification		15,925
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		—
Total other comprehensive loss		(77,568	)	Total other comprehensive income		15,925
Balance as of June 30, 2015	$	(105,354	)	Balance as of June 30, 2015	$	(105,354	)
	Unrealized Losses on Available for Sale Securities				Unrealized Losses on Available for Sale Securities
Balance as of March 31, 2014	$	(237,865	)	Balance as of September 30, 2013	$	(361,394	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification		92,584		Other comprehensive income before reclassification		216,113
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		—
Total other comprehensive income		92,584		Total other comprehensive income		216,113
Balance as of June 30, 2014	$	(145,281	)	Balance as of June 30, 2014	$	(145,281	)

10

Note 3 — Investment Securities

Investment securities available for sale consisted of the following at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:

	June 30, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	590,604	$	296	$	(4,425	)	$	586,475
U.S. government agency securities		5,998,022		—		(155,797	)		5,842,225
	$	6,588,626	$	296	$	(160,222	)	$	6,428,700

	September 30, 2014
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	591,350	$	535	$	(4,770	)	$	587,115
U.S. government agency securities		7,996,488		975		(181,013	)		7,816,450
	$	8,587,838	$	1,510	$	(185,783	)	$	8,403,565

U.S. government agency securities with carrying values of $5,248,022 and $5,070,700 at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits held by the Company at those dates.

There were no sales of available for sale investment securities during the nine months ended June 30, 2015 or 2014.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale at June 30, 2015 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers might have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	June 30, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	145,160	$	145,145
Due after one year through five years		145,444		145,740
Due after ten years		6,298,022		6,137,815
	$	6,588,626	$	6,428,700

11

Investment securities held to maturity consisted of the following at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:

	June 30, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	2,018,553	$	61,857	$	(28,174	)	$	2,052,236
U.S. government agency securities		750,000		—		(52,500	)		697,500
Total	$	2,768,553	$	61,857	$	(80,674	)	$	2,749,736

	September 30, 2014
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	2,022,470	$	58,846	$	(24,752	)	$	2,056,564
U.S. government agency securities		750,000		—		(65,624	)		684,376
Total	$	2,772,470	$	58,846	$	(90,376	)	$	2,740,940

U.S. government agency securities with carrying values of $750,000 at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits held by the Company at those dates.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities held to maturity at June 30, 2015 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers might have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	June 30, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due after five years through ten years	$	483,448	$	530,736
Due after ten years		2,285,105		2,219,000
Total	$	2,768,553	$	2,749,736

12

Temporarily impaired investments consisted of the following at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:

	June 30, 2015
	Less than 12 Months					More than 12 Months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	440,735	$	(4,425	)	$	272,700	$	(28,174	)	$	713,435	$	(32,599	)
U.S. government agency securities		4,513,850		(135,491	)		1,925,372		(72,806	)		6,439,222		(208,297	)
	$	4,954,585	$	(139,916	)	$	2,198,072	$	(100,980	)	$	7,152,657	$	(240,896	)

	September 30, 2014
	Less than 12 Months					More than 12 Months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	297,030	$	(1,310	)	$	572,700	$	(28,212	)	$	869,730	$	(29,522	)
U.S. government agency securities		2,490,575		(7,975	)		4,759,275		(238,663	)		7,249,850		(246,638	)
	$	2,787,605	$	(9,285	)	$	5,331,975	$	(266,875	)	$	8,119,580	$	(276,160	)

The Company reviews its unrealized loss amount quarterly. At June 30, 2015, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines. The Company does not intend to sell, and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity. All investments are interest rate sensitive. These investments earn interest at fixed and adjustable rates. The adjustable rate instruments are generally linked to an index, such as the three-month LIBOR rate, plus or minus a variable. The value of these instruments fluctuates with interest rates.

The Company had 13 securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2015. The Company has concluded that the unrealized losses disclosed above are temporary and that interest rate changes or sector credit ratings changes are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period. The Company’s current intention is not to sell any impaired securities and it is more likely than not it will not be required to sell these securities before the recovery of its amortized cost basis.

13

Note 4 — Mortgage-Backed Securities

The amortized cost and fair values of mortgage-backed securities, all of which are government-sponsored entities secured by residential real estate and are available for sale, are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2015
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Freddie Mac Certificates	$	624	$	44	$	—	$	668
Fannie Mae Certificates		2,482		224		—		2,706
	$	3,106	$	268	$	—	$	3,374

	September 30, 2014
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Freddie Mac Certificates	$	822	$	60	$	—	$	882
Fannie Mae Certificates		4,246		457		—		4,703
	$	5,068	$	517	$	—	$	5,585

There were no sales of mortgage-backed securities during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and there were no temporarily impaired mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2015 or September 30, 2014. In addition, the Company had no securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2015 or September 30, 2014.

The amortized cost and fair values of mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2015 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to repay obligations without penalty.

	June 30, 2015
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Due after one year through five years	$	1,753	$	1,885
Due after five years through ten years		418		453
Due after ten years		935		1,036
	$	3,106	$	3,374

14

Note 5 — Loans

Major classifications of loans are as follows at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:

	June 30,			September 30,
	2015			2014
One-to four-family real estate - owner occupied	$	21,899,590		$	21,556,222
One-to four-family real estate - non-owner occupied		41,002,714			39,185,939
Construction		4,730,363			2,562,823
Multi-family real estate		17,807,636			18,699,192
Commercial real estate		24,710,039			21,635,758
Home equity and second mortgages		2,029,022			1,880,546
Secured loans		150,250			158,512
Commercial leases and loans		18,351,128			19,231,496
Commercial lines of credit		4,256,743			4,790,107
		134,937,485			129,700,595
Plus:
Unamortized loan premiums		11,004			12,176
Less:
Unamortized loan fees and costs, net		(387,640	)		(321,250	)
Allowance for loan losses		(1,431,038	)		(1,361,038	)
	$	133,129,811		$	128,030,483

Loan Portfolio Composition

The loan and lease receivable portfolio is broken down into the following categories: (1) one- to four-family real estate owner occupied and non-owner occupied loans; (2) construction loans; (3) multi-family real estate loans; (4) commercial real estate loans; (5) home equity and second mortgage loans; (6) secured loans; (7) commercial leases and loans; and (8) commercial lines of credit.

One- to four-family real estate loans include residential first mortgage loans originated by the Bank in the greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area. We currently originate fully amortizing loans with maturities up to 30 years. These loans have a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80%, unless they fall into our first-time homebuyer program in our CRA Assessment Area, and then the maximum loan-to-value ratio can extend up to 95%. Due to our stringent underwriting, historical losses, and location of the majority of the portfolio, the Bank’s risk on this segment of the portfolio is considered minimal.

Construction loans include dwelling and land loans where funds are being held by the Bank until the construction has been completed. Dwelling construction consists of new construction and upgrades to existing dwellings. The normal construction period is six months. Construction loans on land are originated for developments where the land is being prepared for future home building. On-site inspections are performed as per the draw schedule for all construction loans. The risk associated with the construction loans is considered low as the Bank makes only a small number of these loans at any given time and adheres to the draw schedule to ensure work is being completed in a timely and professional manner.

Multi-family real estate loans include five or more unit dwellings. These loans could pose a higher risk to the Bank than the one- to four-family real estate loans and therefore are originated with a term of up to 20 years and a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 75%. Different risk factors are taken into consideration when originating these loans such as whether the property is owner or non-owner occupied, location, the strength of the borrower, rent rolls and total lending relationship with the borrower(s).

Commercial real estate loans consist of loans that are originated where a commercial property is being used as collateral. These loans also produce a higher risk to the Bank and have the same maximum terms and loan-to-value ratios as the multi-family loans. The risks associated with these loans are affected by economic conditions, location, strength of the borrower, rent rolls and potential resale value should foreclosure become necessary.

Home equity and second mortgages include loans as first or second liens to any applicant who maintains an owner occupied or single family dwelling. These loans also include home equity lines of credit. The maximum loan amount is $100,000. The first

15

and second lien combined cannot exceed 80% of the appraised value of the property. The risk to the Bank depends on whether we hold the first and/or second lien. We rely heavily on the appraised value to ensure equity is available, as well as the strength of the borrower. These loans are not considered to be more than moderate risk.

Secured loans are made to applicants who maintain deposit accounts at the Bank. The Bank will originate these loans up to a term of five years or to maturity date whichever comes first. These loans pose no risk to the Bank as the loan amount will never exceed the collateral that is securing the loan.

Unsecured improvement loans consist of loans that have no or very little useful collateral and therefore pose a greater risk to the Bank. These loans generally have a higher interest rate assigned to them and a maximum term of up to five years. Well documented underwriting is in place to ensure that the borrower has the ability to repay the debt. While the Bank does not originate a significant amount of these types of loans, they are considered to be moderate to high risk due to the unsecured nature of the loan.

Commercial leases consist of loans that typically are collateralized by either equipment or vehicles. Forms under the Uniform Commercial Code are filed on all collateral to ensure the Bank has the ability to take possession should the loan go into default. The maximum term is up to seven years but typically fall in the three- to five-year range which gives the Bank a quicker repayment of the debt. Based on the collateral alone, the value of which is sometimes difficult to ascertain and can fluctuate as the market and economic climate change, these loans have a higher risk assigned to them. However, our historical loss has been negligible over the last ten years, which is also taken into consideration when the loans are originated and before they are assigned a risk weighting.

Commercial lines of credit consist of lines where residential property is used as collateral. These loans are made to individuals as well as companies, and are collateralized by commercial property, equipment or receivables. The loan amount is determined by the borrower’s financial strength as well as the collateral. The lines are based on the collateral and the ability of the borrower(s) to repay the debt. The lines are closely monitored and limits adjusted accordingly based on updated tax returns and/or other changes to the financial wellbeing of the borrower(s). Subsequently, risk is controlled but considered moderate based on the collateral and nature of the loan.

Credit Quality

The Bank’s risk rating system is made up of five loan grades (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades follows:

Rating 1 – Pass

Rating 1 has asset risks ranging from excellent low risk to acceptable. This rating considers a customer’s history of earnings, cash flow, liquidity, leverage, capitalization, consistency of debt service coverage, the nature and extent of customer relationship and other relevant specific business factors such as the stability of the industry or market area, changes to management, litigation or unexpected events that could have an impact on risks.

Rating 2 – Special Mention

A special mention asset has a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. The special mention classification is a transitory one and is the first classification that requires an action plan to resolve the weaknesses inherent to the credit. These relationships are reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 3 – Substandard

Substandard assets are assets that are inadequately protected by the sound worth or paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. These assets have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified as substandard. The loans may have a delinquent history or combination of weak collateral, weak guarantor strength or income statement losses. These assets listed may include assets with histories of repossessions or some that are non-performing bankruptcies. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

16

Rating 4 – Doubtful

Doubtful assets have many of the same characteristics of substandard assets with the exception that the Bank has determined that loss is not only possible but is probable and the risk is close to certain that loss will occur. When a loan is assigned to this category the Bank will identify the probable loss and it will receive allocation in the loan loss reserve analysis. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 5 – Loss

Once an asset is identified as a definite loss to the Bank, it will receive the classification of “loss.” There may be some future potential recovery; however it is more practical to write off the loan at the time of classification. Losses will be taken in the period in which they are determined to be uncollectable. Credit quality indicators as of June 30, 2015 were as follows:

	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
One-to four-family real estate non-owner occupied	$	41,002,714	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	41,002,714
Construction		4,730,363		—		—		—		—		4,730,363
Multi-family real estate		17,807,636		—		—		—		—		17,807,636
Commercial real estate		24,710,039		—		—		—		—		24,710,039
Commercial leases and loans		18,049,400		—		301,728		—		—		18,351,128
Commercial lines of credit		4,094,281		—		162,462		—		—		4,256,743
	$	110,394,433	$	—	$	464,190	$	—	$	—	$	110,858,623

Credit quality indicators as of September 30, 2014 were as follows:

	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
One-to four-family real estate non-owner occupied	$	39,185,939	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	39,185,939
Construction		2,562,823		—		—		—		—		2,562,823
Multi-family real estate		18,699,192		—		—		—		—		18,699,192
Commercial real estate		21,635,758		—		—		—		—		21,635,758
Commercial leases and loans		18,843,633		—		387,863		—		—		19,231,496
Commercial lines of credit		4,174,051		192,139		423,917		—		—		4,790,107
	$	105,101,396	$	192,139	$	811,780	$	—	$	—	$	106,105,315

17

The following table presents performing and non-performing residential real estate and consumer loans based on payment activity as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014. Payment activity is reviewed by management on a monthly basis to determine how loans are performing. Loans are considered to be non-performing when they become 90 days past due.

	June 30, 2015
	Nonperforming Loans		Performing Loans		Total
One-to four-family real estate - owner occupied	$	—	$	21,899,590	$	21,899,590
Home equity and second mortgages		—		2,029,022		2,029,022
Secured loans		—		150,250		150,250
	$	—	$	24,078,862	$	24,078,862

	September 30, 2014
	Nonperforming Loans		Performing Loans		Total
One-to four-family real estate - owner occupied	$	36,263	$	21,519,959	$	21,556,222
Home equity and second mortgages		—		1,880,546		1,880,546
Secured loans		—		158,512		158,512
	$	36,263	$	23,559,017	$	23,595,280

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. There was one impaired loans as of June 30, 2015, with no related allowance. The Company did not recognize any interest income from this loan for the three and nine month period ended June 30, 2015. There were two impaired loans at September 30, 2014.

18

	Impaired Loans with Specific Allowance				Impaired Loans with No Specific Allowance		Total Impaired Loans
	Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
June 30, 2015
Commercial leases and loans	$	—	$	—	$	301,728	$	301,728	$	301,728	$	344,795	$	—

	Impaired Loans with Specific Allowance				Impaired Loans with No Specific Allowance		Total Impaired Loans
									Unpaid		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Related		Recorded		Recorded		Principal		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Allowance		Investment		Investment		Balance		Investment		Recognized
September 30, 2014
Commercial leases and loans	$	—	$	—	$	387,863	$	387,863	$	387,863	$	415,179	$	15,175
Commercial lines of credit		—		—		423,917		423,917		423,917		423,917		—
	$	—	$	—	$	811,780	$	811,780	$	811,780	$	839,096	$	15,175

The Bank did not have any TDRs in the three or nine month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. Nor did it have any TDRs within the year ended September 30, 2014.

19

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of June 30, 2015:

	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual Loans
One-to four-family real estate owner occupied	$	87,612	$	—	$	—	$	87,612	$	21,811,978	$	21,899,590	$	—
One-to four family real estate non-owner occupied		141,200		—		—		141,200		40,861,514		41,002,714		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		4,730,363		4,730,363		—
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		17,807,636		17,807,636		—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		24,710,039		24,710,039		—
Home equity and second mortgages		—		—		—		—		2,029,022		2,029,022		—
Secured loans		—		—		—		—		150,250		150,250		—
Commercial leases and loans		—		—		301,728		301,728		18,049,400		18,351,128		301,728
Commercial lines of credit		—		—		—		—		4,256,743		4,256,743		—
	$	228,812	$	—	$	301,728	$	530,540	$	134,406,945	$	134,937,485	$	301,728

The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of September 30, 2014:

	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual Loans
One-to four-family real estate owner occupied	$	256,707	$	—	$	36,263	$	292,970	$	21,263,252	$	21,556,222	$	36,263
One-to four family real estate non-owner occupied		—		—		—		—		39,185,939		39,185,939		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		2,562,823		2,562,823		—
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		18,699,192		18,699,192		—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		21,635,758		21,635,758		—
Home equity and second mortgages		—		—		—		—		1,880,546		1,880,546		—
Secured loans		—		—		—		—		158,512		158,512		—
Commercial leases and loans		—		—		387,863		387,863		18,843,633		19,231,496		387,863
Commercial lines of credit		—		—		423,917		423,917		4,366,190		4,790,107		423,917
	$	256,707	$	—	$	848,043	$	1,104,750	$	128,595,845	$	129,700,595	$	848,043

Eureka Bank primarily grants loans to customers throughout Southwestern Pennsylvania. Eureka Bank maintains a diversified loan portfolio and the ability of its debtors to honor their obligations is not substantially dependent on any particular economic business sector. Loans on non-accrual at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 were approximately $302,000 and $848,000, respectively. The foregone interest on non-accrual loans was $649 and $12,593 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and $24,262 and $26,654 for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, there were no loans that were 90 days or more delinquent and still accruing interest.

20

The following tables detail the allowance for loan losses and loan receivable balances at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014. An allocation of the allowance to one category of loans does not prevent the Company’s ability to utilize the allowance to absorb losses in a different category. The loans receivable are disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology.

	One-to four-family real estate - owner occupied			One-to four-family real estate  - non-owner occupied			Construction			Multi-family real estate			Commercial real estate			Home equity and second mortgages		Secured loans		Commercial leases and loans		Commercial lines of credit			Non- allocated			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance 4/1/2015	$	129,442		$	263,838		$	68,778		$	103,337		$	234,399		$	18,906	$	—	$	313,091	$	43,274		$	245,973		$	1,421,038
Charge-offs		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Provisions (credits)		(6,207	)		1,728			(25,324	)		(3,533	)		8,761			13,560		—		13,100		(1,388	)		9,303			10,000
Ending balance 6/30/15	$	123,235		$	265,566		$	43,454		$	99,804		$	243,160		$	32,466	$	—	$	326,191	$	41,886		$	255,276		$	1,431,038
Beginning balance 10/1/2014	$	155,957		$	307,400		$	36,253		$	141,179		$	222,886		$	8,302	$	—	$	271,367	$	50,333		$	167,361		$	1,361,038
Charge-offs		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Provisions (credits)		(32,722	)		(41,834	)		7,201			(41,375	)		20,274			24,164		—		54,824		(8,447	)		87,915			70,000
Ending balance 6/30/15	$	123,235		$	265,566		$	43,454		$	99,804		$	243,160		$	32,466	$	—	$	326,191	$	41,886		$	255,276		$	1,431,038
Beginning balance 4/1/2014	$	148,305		$	284,327		$	41,187		$	143,351		$	313,838		$	8,869	$	—	$	264,564	$	49,274		$	70,323		$	1,324,038
Charge-offs		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Provisions (credits)		2,593			12,850			(3,957	)		349			(52,092	)		779		—		3,444		4,343			56,691			25,000
Ending balance 6/30/14	$	150,898		$	297,177		$	37,230		$	143,700		$	261,746		$	9,648	$	—	$	268,008	$	53,617		$	127,014		$	1,349,038
Beginning balance 10/1/2013	$	156,975		$	267,895		$	19,435		$	141,683		$	269,940		$	7,471	$	—	$	246,978	$	46,381		$	142,280		$	1,299,038
Charge-offs		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Provisions (credits)		(6,077	)		29,282			17,795			2,017			(8,194	)		2,177		—		21,030		7,236			(15,266	)		50,000
Ending balance 6/30/14	$	150,898		$	297,177		$	37,230		$	143,700		$	261,746		$	9,648	$	—	$	268,008	$	53,617		$	127,014		$	1,349,038
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance 6/30/2015	$	123,235		$	265,566		$	43,454		$	99,804		$	243,160		$	32,466	$	—	$	326,191	$	41,886		$	255,276		$	1,431,038
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	123,235		$	265,566		$	43,454		$	99,804		$	243,160		$	32,466	$	—	$	326,191	$	41,886		$	255,276		$	1,431,038
Loans receivables:
Ending balance 6/30/2015	$	21,899,590		$	41,002,714		$	4,730,363		$	17,807,636		$	24,710,039		$	2,029,022	$	150,250	$	18,351,128	$	4,256,743		$	—		$	134,937,485
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	301,728	$	—		$	—		$	301,728
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	21,899,590		$	41,002,714		$	4,730,363		$	17,807,636		$	24,710,039		$	2,029,022	$	150,250	$	18,049,400	$	4,256,743		$	—		$	134,635,757
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance 9/30/2014	$	155,957		$	307,400		$	36,253		$	141,179		$	222,886		$	8,302	$	—	$	271,367	$	50,333		$	167,361		$	1,361,038
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—	��	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	155,957		$	307,400		$	36,253		$	141,179		$	222,886		$	8,302	$	—	$	271,367	$	50,333		$	167,361		$	1,361,038
Loans receivables:
Ending balance 9/30/2014	$	21,556,222		$	39,185,939		$	2,562,823		$	18,699,192		$	21,635,758		$	1,880,546	$	158,512	$	19,231,496	$	4,790,107		$	—		$	129,700,595
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	387,863	$	423,917		$	—		$	811,780
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	21,556,222		$	39,185,939		$	2,562,823		$	18,699,192		$	21,635,758		$	1,880,546	$	158,512	$	18,843,633	$	4,366,190		$	—		$	128,888,815

21

Note 6 — Commitments

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss for loan and lease commitments (unfunded loans and leases) at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $11,643,000 and $12,283,000, respectively, with interest rates from 1.75% to 6.75%. Fixed rate loan commitments at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 were approximately $4,226,000 and $5,660,000, respectively, with fixed rates of interest ranging from 1.75% to 6.75% and 3.00% to 6.75%, respectively.

In the normal course of business, there are various outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of the Company’s customers. These arrangements have credit risk essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and are subject to the Company’s normal credit policies and loan underwriting standards. Collateral is obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer. Management currently expects no loss from these activities.

22

Note 7 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year-end.

The Company follows a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level I measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level III measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level I:Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level II:Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level III:Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 are as follows:

	June 30, 2015
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Description
Available for Sale Investments:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	3,374	$	—	$	3,374
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		586,475		—		586,475
U.S. government agency securities		—		5,842,225		—		5,842,225
Total	$	—	$	6,432,074	$	—	$	6,432,074

	September 30, 2014
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Description
Available for Sale Investments:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	5,585	$	—	$	5,585
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		587,115		—		587,115
U.S. government agency securities		—		7,816,450		—		7,816,450
Total	$	—	$	8,409,150	$	—	$	8,409,150

23

The following tables present the financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 by level within the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves. Techniques used to value the collateral that secure the impaired loan include: quoted market prices for identical assets classified as Level I inputs, employed by certified appraisers, for similar assets classified as Level II inputs. In cases where valuation techniques include inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and assumptions developed by management based on the best information available under each circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level III inputs.

	June 30, 2015
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Description
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	301,728	$	301,728
Other real estate owned		—		—		539,735		539,735
	$	—	$	—	$	841,463	$	841,463

	September 30, 2014
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Description
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	811,780	$	811,780

The following tables present additional quantitative information about Level III assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 and for which the Bank uses Level III inputs to determine fair value:

	June 30, 2015
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired Loans	$	301,728	Discounted cash flow	Probability of default		—
Other real estate owned		539,735	Fair Value of collateral (1)	Appraisal adjustments (2)		20 (20	%  )
	$	841,463

	September 30, 2014
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired Loans	$	387,863	Discounted cash flow	Probability of default		—
		423,917	Fair Value of collateral (1)	Appraisal adjustments (2)		20 (20	%  )
	$	811,780

(1) Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally includes various Level III inputs which are not identifiable.

(2) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

24

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions that are presented below the following tables were used to estimate fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:

	June 30, 2015
	Carrying								Total
	Value		Level I		Level II		Level III		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,282,767	$	8,282,767	$	—	$	—	$	8,282,767
Investment securities available for sale		6,428,700		—		6,428,700		—		6,428,700
Investment securities held to maturity		2,768,553		—		2,749,736		—		2,749,736
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		3,374		—		3,374		—		3,374
FHLB stock		131,900		131,900		—		—		131,900
Cash surrender value of life insurance		307,776		307,776		—		—		307,776
Loans receivable, net		133,129,811		—		—		139,617,811		139,617,811
Accrued interest receivable		554,445		554,445		—		—		554,445
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	129,111,987	$	60,070,746	$	—	$	69,070,240	$	129,140,986
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		710,365		710,365		—		—		710,365
Accrued interest payable		95,306		95,306		—		—		95,306

	September 30, 2014
	Carrying								Total
	Value		Level I		Level II		Level III		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,639,943	$	9,639,943	$	—	$	—	$	9,639,943
Investment securities available for sale		8,403,565		—		8,403,565		—		8,403,565
Investment securities held to maturity		2,772,470		—		2,740,940		—		2,740,940
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		5,585		—		5,585		—		5,585
FHLB stock		302,500		302,500		—		—		302,500
Cash surrender value of life insurance		286,762		286,762		—		—		286,762
Loans receivable, net		128,030,483		—		—		134,453,483		134,453,483
Accrued interest receivable		583,389		583,389		—		—		583,389
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	127,860,561	$	57,486,788	$	—	$	70,261,774	$	127,748,562
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		633,159		633,159		—		—		633,159
Accrued interest payable		71,341		71,341		—		—		71,341

25

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment Securities and Mortgage Backed Securities

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

FHLB Stock

The carrying value of the FHLB stock is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to restrictions on the securities.

Loans Receivable

The fair values for one-to four-family residential loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis using fields from similar products in the secondary markets. The carrying amount of construction loans approximated its fair value given their short-term nature. The fair values of consumer and commercial loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates reported in various government releases and the Company’s own product pricing schedule for loans with terms similar to the Company’s. The fair values of multi-family and nonresidential mortgages are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates based on a national survey of similar loans.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Deposits

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the repricing date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values of certificates of deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies a comparable FHLB advance rate to the aggregated weighted average maturity on time deposits.

Advances from Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance

The fair value of advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.

Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

The values of off-balance sheet commitments are based on their carrying value, taking into account the remaining terms and conditions of the agreement.

26

Note 8 — Capital Requirements

The Bank is subject to regulatory capital adequacy requirements promulgated by federal bank regulatory agencies. Failure by the Bank to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In early July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved revisions to their capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules that implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly called Basel III, and address relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. “Basel III” refers to two consultative documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2009, the rules text released in December 2010, and loss absorbency rules issued in January 2011, which include significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements.

The rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which became effective January 1, 2015, and revised the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Bank are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. In addition, the rules assign a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The rules also eliminate the inclusion of certain instruments, such as trust preferred securities, from Tier 1 capital. However, instruments issued prior to May 19, 2010 will be grandfathered for institutions with consolidated assets of $15 billion or less. In addition, Tier 2 capital is no longer limited to the amount of Tier 1 capital included in total capital. Mortgage servicing rights, certain deferred tax assets and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries over designated percentages of common stock will be required to be deducted from capital, subject to a two-year transition period. Finally, Tier 1 capital will include accumulated other comprehensive income (which includes all unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt and equity securities), subject to a two-year transition period.

The rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital and would result in the following minimum ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. The new capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and would increase by that amount each year until fully implemented in January 2019. An institution would be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations would establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.

Information presented below as of June 30, 2015 reflects the Basel III capital requirements that became effective January 1, 2015 for the Bank. Under these capital requirements and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend if the effect thereof would cause its net worth to be reduced below either the amounts required for the liquidation account established in connection with the Bank’s “second step” conversion or the regulatory capital requirements imposed by federal and state regulations.

The most recent notification from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” the Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, core and tangible ratios as set forth in the accompanying table. There are no conditions or events since the notification that management believed has changed the institution’s category.

27

The following table illustrates the Company’s actual regulatory capital levels compared with its regulatory capital requirements at June 30, 2015.

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes							To be well Capitalized under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount				Ratio			Amount				Ratio
	(in thousands)
As of June 30, 2015
Common equity Tier I capital to total risk-weighted assets	$	22,354		21.37	%		>	$	4,708	>	4.50	%		>	$	6,801	>	6.50	%
Tier I capital to total risk-weighted assets		22,354		21.37	%		>		6,278	>	6.00	%		>		8,370	>	8.00	%
Total capital to total risk-weighted assets		23,661		22.62	%		>		8,370	>	8.00	%		>		10,463	>	10.00	%
Tier I leverage capital to average assets		22,354		14.28	%		>		6,263	>	4.00	%		>		7,829	>	5.00	%

The following is a reconciliation of the Bank’s equity under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to regulatory capital as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:

	June 30, 2015		September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)
Total equity	$	22,249	$	21,972
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale		105		121
Tier 1 capital	$	22,354		22,093
Allowable allowances for loan and lease losses		1,307		1,234
Total risk-based capital	$	23,661	$	23,327

Note 9 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-01,Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.The amendments in this Update permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04,Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure.The amendments in this Update clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments in this Update using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

28

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (a new revenue recognition standard). The Update’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, this update specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. This Update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting Update.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11,Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. The amendments in this Update change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. For repurchase financing arrangements, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The amendments also require enhanced disclosures. The accounting changes in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. An entity is required to present changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the effective date as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Earlier application is prohibited. The disclosure for certain transactions accounted for as a sale is required to be presented for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and the disclosure for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions accounted for as secured borrowings is required to be presented for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and for interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. The disclosures are not required to be presented for comparative periods before the effective date. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statement.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12,Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments when the Terms of an Award Provide that a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-14,Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40). The amendments in this Update require that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met: (1) the loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure, (2) at the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim, and (3) at the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed. Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15,Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic205-40). The amendments in this Update provide guidance in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This Update clarifies how current U.S. GAAP should be interpreted in subjectively evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. Public business entities are required to implement the new requirements in fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

29

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-17,Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting.The amendments in this Update apply to the separate financial statements of an acquired entity and its subsidiaries that are a business or nonprofit activity (either public or nonpublic) upon the occurrence of an event in which an acquirer (an individual or an entity) obtains control of the acquired entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs. If pushdown accounting is not applied in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs, an acquired entity will have the option to elect to apply pushdown accounting in a subsequent reporting period to the acquired entity’s most recent change-in-control event. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01,Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items,as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. This Update eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively. A reporting entity may also apply the amendments retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02,Consolidation (Topic 810). The amendments in this Update affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments (1) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) or voting interest entities; (2) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership; (3) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related-party relationships; and (4) provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03,Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. An entity should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04,Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. For an entity with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end, the amendments in this Update provide a practical expedient that permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. The practical expedient should be applied consistently to all plans if an entity has more than one plan. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

30

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. This guidance will help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement. The amendments in this Update provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. For public business entities, the FASB decided that the amendments will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. For all other entities, the amendments will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-06,Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions. Topic 260,Earnings Per Share, contains guidance that addresses master limited partnerships that originated from Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 07-4,Application of the Two-Class Method Under FASB Statement No. 128 to Master Limited Partnerships. Under Topic 260, master limited partnerships apply the two-class method of calculating earnings per unit because the general partner, limited partners, and incentive distribution rights holders each participate differently in the distribution of available cash in accordance with the contractual rights contained in the partnership agreement. The amendments in this Update specify that for purposes of calculating historical earnings per unit under the two-class method, the earnings (losses) of a transferred business before the date of a dropdown transaction should be allocated entirely to the general partner. In that circumstance, the previously reported earnings per unit of the limited partners (which is typically the earnings per unit measure presented in the financial statements) would not change as a result of the dropdown transaction. Qualitative disclosures about how the rights to the earnings (losses) differ before and after the dropdown transaction occurs for purposes of computing earnings per unit under the two-class method are also required. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07,Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). The Update applies to reporting entities that elect to measure the fair value of an investment using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient. Under the amendments in this Update, investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) using the practical expedient should not be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. Removing those investments from the fair value hierarchy not only eliminates the diversity in practice resulting from the way in which investments measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) with future redemption dates are classified, but also ensures that all investments categorized in the fair value hierarchy are classified using a consistent approach. Investments that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent), but for which the practical expedient is not applied will continue to be included in the fair value hierarchy. A reporting entity should continue to disclose information on investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient to help users understand the nature and risks of the investments and whether the investments, if sold, are probable of being sold at amounts different from net asset value. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. A reporting entity should apply the amendments retrospectively to all periods presented. The retrospective approach requires that an investment for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient be removed from the fair value hierarchy in all periods presented in an entity’s financial statements. Earlier application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-08, Business Combinations – Pushdown Accounting – Amendment to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115. This Update was issued to amend various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-09,Financial Services – Insurance (Topic 944): Disclosure About Short-Duration Contracts. The amendments apply to all insurance entities that issue short-duration contracts as defined in Topic 944,Financial Services – Insurance. The amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual reporting periods certain information about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. The amendments also require insurance entities to disclose information about significant changes in methodologies and assumptions used to calculate the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, including reasons for the change and the effects on the financial statements. Additionally, the

31

amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual and interim reporting periods a rollforward of the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, described in Topic 944. For health insurance claims, the amendments require the disclosure of the total of incurred-but-not-reported liabilities plus expected development on reported claims included in the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-10,Technical Corrections and Improvements. The amendments in this Update represent changes to clarify the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”), correct unintended application of guidance, or make minor improvements to the Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. Transition guidance varies based on the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update that require transition guidance are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. All other amendments will be effective upon the issuance of this Update. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Safe Harbor Statement for Forward-Looking Statements

This report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are not historical facts; rather they are statements based on the Company’s current expectations regarding its business strategies and its intended results and future performance. Forward-looking statements are preceded by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends” and similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Numerous risks and uncertainties could cause or contribute to the Company’s actual results, performance and achievements being materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause or contribute to these differences include, without limitation, general economic conditions, including changes in market interest rates and changes in monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government; legislative and regulatory changes; the quality and composition of the loan and investment securities portfolio; real estate values in our market area; loan demand; deposit flows; competition; and changes in accounting principles and guidelines. Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in the Company’s in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on December 29, 2014, under the section titled “Risk Factors.” These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, the Company assumes no obligation and disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of Eureka Financial Corp.’s financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses. We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions that we use are based on historical experience and various other factors and are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level representing management’s best estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio, based on management’s evaluation of the portfolio’s collectability. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged against income. Management estimates the allowance balance required using loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, the size and composition of the loan portfolio, trends and absolute levels of non-performing loans, classified and criticized loans and delinquent loans, trends in risk ratings, trends in industry charge-offs by particular segments and changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our lending areas and

32

the national economy. Additionally, for loans identified by management as impaired, management will provide a specific provision for loan losses based on the expected discounted cash flows of the loan, or for loans determined to be collateral dependent, a specific provision for loan losses is established based on appraised value less costs to sell. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impaired loans; value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if actual conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. Further, current economic conditions have increased the uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. In addition, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings.

Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require us to make projections of future tax rates and taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset.

Valuation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities. We evaluate our investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment, which requires significant judgment. We assess whether other-than-temporary impairment has occurred when the fair value of a debt security is less than the amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. Under these circumstances, other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred: (1) if we intend to sell the security; (2) if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. For securities that we do not expect to sell or that we are not more likely than not to be required to sell, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into credit and non-credit components. The credit-related other-than-temporary impairment, represented by the expected loss in principal, is recognized in non-interest income, while noncredit-related other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Noncredit-related other-than-temporary impairment results from other factors, including increased liquidity spreads and extension of the security. For securities which we do expect to sell, all other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings. Other-than-temporary impairment is presented in the income statement on a gross basis with a reduction for the amount of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Once an other-than-temporary impairment is recorded, when future cash flows can be reasonably estimated, future cash flows are re-allocated between interest and principal cash flows to provide for a level-yield on the security.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014

Assets increased $2.4 million, or 1.6%, to $154.6 million at June 30, 2015 from $152.2 million at September 30, 2014, primarily due to a $5.1 million increase in net loans offset by a $2.0 million decrease in investment securities available for sale, a $1.5 million decrease in interest-bearing deposits in other banks and a $300,000 increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets. During the nine month period ended June 30, 2015, two loans totaling $540,000 were transferred from loans to other real estate owned. The decrease in interest-bearing deposits was due to the $5.1 million increase in loan originations during the nine months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in investment securities available for sale was the result of bond calls totaling $3.5 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2015.

The increase in loans was primarily due to a $3.1 million increase in commercial real estate loans, a $2.2 million increase in construction loans, a $1.8 million increase in non-owner occupied one-to four-family real estate loans and a $300,000 increase in owner-occupied one-to four-family real estate loans, partially offset by a $900,000 decrease in multifamily real estate loans, a $900,000 decrease in commercial leases and loans and a $500,000 decrease in commercial lines of credit. The increases in commercial real estate, construction and one-to four-family real estate loans were primarily the result of our continued offering of competitive rates, strong customer service and borrowings by long-standing and new lending relationships.

33

Eureka Financial Corp. actively manages credit risk through its underwriting practices and collection operations and it does not offer nor has it historically offered loans to subprime or Alt-A borrowers. There was one non-accrual loan at June 30, 2015 totaling $302,000, or 0.22% of total loans. There were three non-accrual loans that existed at September 30, 2014 totaling $848,000, or 0.65% of total loans. The non-accrual loan at June 30, 2015 consisted of a commercial line of credit.

Total liabilities increased by $1.7 million, or 1.3%, to $131.2 million at June 30, 2015 from $129.5 million at September 30, 2014. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in deposits of $1.3 million. The increase in deposits was primarily due to a $3.5 million increase in CDARS deposits, a $1.6 million increase in NOW and money market accounts and a $1.0 million increase in savings deposits, offset by a $4.8 million decrease in certificates of deposit. The increase in CDARS deposits is the result of the Bank’s participation in the CDARS one-way buy program. The CDARS program allows the Bank to attract term deposits at lower cost compared to the Bank’s internal offering rates and FHLB borrowing rates. The decrease in certificates of deposit is primarily due to special rate programs being offered by other local financial institutions.

Stockholders’ equity increased $725,000 to $23.4 million at June 30, 2015 from $22.7 million at September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily the result of net income totaling $1.1 million, a $16,000 decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss, $94,000 related to the allocation of ESOP shares and, $80,000 related to stock benefit plans, offset by dividends totaling $484,000, and the retirement of 6,578 shares at a cost of $125,000 during the period.

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Overview.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income	$	391		$	402
Basic and earnings per share		0.34			0.34
Diluted earnings per share		0.34			0.34
Average equity to average assets		15.01	%		15.29	%

	For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands, except
	per share amounts)
Net income	$	1,143		$	1,114
Basic earnings per share		0.98			0.93
Diluted earnings per share		0.98			0.93
Average equity to average assets		14.83	%		15.31	%

The decrease in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to a $4,000 increase in net interest income and a $15,000 decrease in the provision for loan losses offset by an $26,000 decrease in non-interest income, and a $25,000 increase in non-interest expense.

The increase in net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to a $157,000 increase in net interest income offset by an $8,000 decrease in non-interest income and a $108,000 increase in non-interest expense.

34

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $4,000 to $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, higher net interest income was the result of a $6,000 increase in total interest income, a $6,000 increase in deposit interest expense and a $4,000 decrease in FHLB borrowing expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the average balance of loans receivable increased $6.7 million, offset by a six basis point decrease in the average yield compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the average balance of investment securities and interest bearing deposits decreased $600,000 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2015, net interest income increased $157,000 to $4.6 million compared to the same period of the prior year. Higher net interest income was the result of a $117,000 increase in total interest income, a $30,000 decrease in deposit interest expense and a $10,000 decrease in FHLB borrowing expense. For the nine months ended June 30, 2015, the increase in interest income resulted from a $6.3 million increase in the average balance of loans, and a $4.1 million increase in the average balance of investment securities offset by a 17 basis point decrease in the average yield of interest-earning assets. The decrease in total interest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to an $8.1 million decrease in the average balance of certificates of deposits and a four basis point decrease in their average cost.

35

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by current volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of these tables, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionally based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Rate			Volume			Net
	(In thousands)
Interest Income:
Loans receivable	$	(70	)	$	84		$	14
Investment securities		(4	)		(3	)		(7	)
Total interest-earning assets		(74	)		81			7
Interest Expense:
NOW and money market accounts		—			2			2
Passbook and club accounts		—			1			1
IRA accounts		(2	)		(1	)		(3	)
Certificates of deposit		127			(146	)		(19	)
CDARS		1			24			25
FHLB advances		(2	)		(2	)		(4	)
		124			(122	)		2
Net change in net interest income	$	(198	)	$	203		$	5

	Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Nine Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Rate			Volume			Net
	(In thousands)
Interest Income:
Loans receivable	$	(229	)	$	294		$	65
Investment securities		25			27			52
Total interest-earning assets		(204	)		321			117
Interest Expense:
NOW and money market accounts		2			10			12
Passbook and club accounts		1			1			2
IRA accounts		(10	)		(2	)		(12	)
Certificates of deposit		387			(480	)		(93	)
CDARS		(3	)		65			62
FHLB advances		(5	)		(5	)		(10	)
		372			(411	)		(39	)
Net change in net interest income	$	(576	)	$	732		$	156

36

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 was $10,000 and $70,000, respectively compared to $25,000 and $50,000, respectively for the comparable 2014 periods. The three month decrease in the provision was based on methodology used to determine an adequate level of allowance for loan losses, including the level of non-performing loans.

The Company’s calculated allowance requirement for credit losses on one-to four-family real estate loans and multi-family real estate loans decreased during the nine month period ended June 30, 2015. The reduction in the allowance requirement for these type loans is due to a decrease in the historical loss percentage factor that is used in the calculation to generate the required allowance amount. There is no reserve established for the commercial leases and loans individually evaluated for impairment as the collateral is deemed sufficient to protect against loss.

There was $302,000 in non-accruing loans at June 30, 2015 compared to $848,000 at September 30, 2014. There were no net charge-offs for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Non-Interest Income. The following tables show the components of non-interest income and the percentage changes for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2015		2014		$ Change			% Change
Fees on deposit accounts	$	10,172	$	8,452	$	1,720			20.4	%
Other income		9,978		37,814		(27,836	)		(73.6	)%
Total non-interest income	$	20,150	$	46,266	$	(26,116	)		(56.4	)%

	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	2015		2014		$ Change			% Change
Fees on deposit accounts	$	28,248	$	24,198	$	4,050			16.7	%
Other income		50,416		62,734		(12,318	)		(19.6	)%
Total non-interest income	$	78,664	$	86,932	$	(8,268	)		(9.5	)%

For the three month period ended June 30, 2015, the decrease in other income includes a $311 decrease in the cash surrender value of insurance policies compared to a $29,000 increase for the three month period ended June 30, 2014.

For the nine month period ended June 30, 2015, the decrease in other income includes a $11,070 increase in the cash surrender value of insurance policies compared to $36,000 increase for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2014.

37

Non-Interest Expense. The following tables show the components of non-interest expense and the percentage changes for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2015		2014		$ Change			% Change
Salaries and benefits	$	574,313	$	547,466	$	26,847			4.9	%
Occupancy		85,408		84,694		714			0.8	%
Data processing		64,377		68,708		(4,331	)		(6.3	)%
Professional fees		76,252		90,665		(14,413	)		(15.9	)%
FDIC insurance premiums		18,150		18,150		—			—	%
Other		118,710		102,271		16,439			16.1	%
Total non-interest expense	$	937,210	$	911,954	$	25,256			2.8	%

Salaries and benefits expense increased $27,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 due primarily to a $7,000 increase in salary and benefits expense, a $7,000 increase in retirement fund contributions, a $5,000 increase in ESOP expense and a $7,000 increase in restricted stock and options expense. Professional fees decreased $14,000 primarily due to a decrease in the expense related to the use of consultants in order to maintain compliance with increasing regulatory compliance requirements. The increase in other expenses is related to cost associated with debit card processing, stock related activities and other real estate owned expenses.

	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	2015		2014		$ Change			% Change
Salaries and benefits	$	1,675,361	$	1,609,654	$	65,707			4.1	%
Occupancy		267,485		264,398		3,087			1.2	%
Data processing		191,990		202,397		(10,407	)		(5.1	)%
Professional fees		274,523		250,044		24,479			9.8	%
FDIC insurance premiums		54,450		51,700		2,750			5.3	%
Other		373,711		351,627		22,084			6.3	%
Total non-interest expense	$	2,837,520	$	2,729,820	$	107,700			3.9	%

Salaries and benefits expense increased $66,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 due to a $26,000 increase in retirement fund contributions, an $18,000 increase in salary and benefits expense, a $13,000 increase in ESOP expense and a $7,400 increase in restricted stock and options expense. Professional fees increased $24,000 primarily due to the increased use of consultants in order to maintain compliance with increasing regulatory compliance requirements. The increase in other expenses is primarily related to cost associated with debit cards processing and other real estate owned expenses.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $185,000 and $592,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to $206,000 and $600,000 for the comparable periods in 2014. The decrease in income tax expense in the 2015 periods was primarily the result of a higher level of tax-free income from municipal loans.

38

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, FHLB advances, loan repayments and maturities of investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management policy.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The level of these assets depends on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At June 30, 2015, cash and cash equivalents totaled $8.3 million. In addition, at June 30, 2015, we had the ability to borrow a total of approximately $70.0 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. At June 30, 2015, we had no FHLB advances outstanding.

At June 30, 2015, we had $11.6 million in loan commitments outstanding, which consisted of commitments to grant $2.2 million in loans and $1.0 million in commercial leases. At June 30, 2015, we had $5.4 million in undisbursed lines of credit, $1.9 million in undisbursed construction loans, $800,000 in undisbursed home equity lines of credit and $322,000 in undisbursed loans in process.

Certificates of deposit due within one year of June 30, 2015 totaled $24.3 million, representing 46.6% of certificates of deposit, and 18.8% of total deposits at June 30, 2015. We believe, based on past experience, that we will retain a significant portion of these deposits at maturity. However, if these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we redeemed $1.5 million in CDARS deposits as a result of excess liquidity. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before June 30, 2016.

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and provides for its own liquidity to pay its operating expenses and other financial obligations. At June 30, 2015, the Company had $1.0 million in liquid assets.

Capital Management. The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth and deposit withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. Historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they mature.

The Bank is required to maintain specific amounts of capital pursuant to Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulatory requirements. As of June 30, 2015, the Bank was in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements, which were effective as of such date, with total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and core capital ratios of 22.62%, 21.37% and 14.28%, respectively. At June 30, 2015, the Bank was considered “well-capitalized” under applicable regulatory guidelines.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit. For information about our loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit, see note 5 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q and in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2014.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Bank did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

39

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

This item is not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings. The Bank is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. The Bank’s management believes that such routine legal proceedings, in the aggregate, are immaterial to the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

For information regarding the Company’s risk factors, see “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014, as filed with the SEC on December 29, 2014. As of June 30, 2015, the risk factors of the Company have not changed materially from those disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares as Part of Publically Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number of Shares Yet To Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
April 1 through April 30		—		—		—		116,021
May 1 through May 31		—		—		—		116,021
June 1 through June 30		52	$	19.02		52		115,969
Total		52				52

(1) On September 16, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the repurchase of up to 122,547 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, from time to time, depending on market conditions. The stock repurchase program will expire upon the purchase of the maximum number of shares authorized under the program, unless the board of directors terminates the program earlier.

40

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Eureka Financial Corp. (1)
3.2	Bylaws of Eureka Financial Corp. (1)
4.0	Form of Stock Certificate of Eureka Financial Corp. (1)
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.0	Section 1350 Certification
101.0	The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(1) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-169767), as amended, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2010.

41

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP.
Dated: August 14, 2015	By:	/s/ Edward F. Seserko
		Edward F. Seserko
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(principal executive officer)
Dated: August 14, 2015	By:	/s/ Gary B. Pepper
		Gary B. Pepper
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(principal accounting and financial officer)

42