Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net | GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET Current Period Charges As previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value for the Discount Supplements reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by less than 10% as of December 31, 2014. During the third quarter of 2015, the Company evaluated the financial results of key strategic initiatives, which were undertaken as a result of declining results in the first half of 2015 and continued deterioration of market share. Based on the financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Company concluded that these strategic measures were unsuccessful. As a result, the Company determined the Discount Supplements business does not fit into the Company’s strategic plan for maximizing long-term shareholder returns based on the Company’s expectations of the required investments necessary to improve the financial performance of the business, both in the short and long-term. The Company is currently considering strategic options for the business, one of which is to cease operations beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, subject to the outcome of legally-required consultation with employee representatives in the United Kingdom. The current and anticipated financial performance of the business, coupled with the Company’s consideration of future strategic options was considered a triggering event requiring an interim goodwill impairment review of the Discount Supplements reporting unit as of September 30, 2015. The determination of whether any impairment of goodwill exists is based upon a two-step process. In step one of the analysis, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to the unit’s carrying value, including goodwill, to determine if there is a potential impairment. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, the goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and no further analysis or action is required. If the analysis in step one indicates that the carrying value exceeds the fair value, step two of the test is performed to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. In step two of the test, the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of the goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. That is, the fair value of a reporting unit is allocated to the fair value of assets and liabilities of that reporting unit, including unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its net assets represents the implied fair value of goodwill, which is compared to its carrying value to determine the impairment charge for any deficit. The Company determined the fair value of the Discount Supplements reporting unit using a discounted cash flow method (income approach), which requires the use of internal business plans that are based on judgments and estimates. The use of judgments and estimates involves inherent uncertainties. The Company's measurement of the fair value of the Discount Supplements reporting unit depends on the accuracy of the assumptions used and how the Company's estimates compare to future operating performance. The key assumptions used are, but not limited to, the following: • Future cash flow assumptions - The Company's projections for Discount Supplements are based on organic growth and are derived from historical experience and assumptions regarding future growth and profitability trends. These projections also take into account the current economic climate in the United Kingdom where Discount Supplements operates, and the extent to which the regulatory environment is expected to impact future growth opportunities. The Company's analysis incorporated an assumed period of cash flows of five years with a terminal value. • Discount rate - The discount rate is based on Discount Supplements' estimated weighted average cost of capital ("WACC"). The components of WACC are the cost of equity and the cost of debt, each of which requires judgment by management to estimate. The Company develops its cost of equity estimate based on perceived risks and predictability of future cash flows. At September 30, 2015, the WACC used to estimate the fair value of the Discount Supplements reporting unit was 16.5% . As a result of the review, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the Discount Supplements reporting unit exceeded its fair value and conducted a step two analysis. Based on the results of the step two analysis, the Company concluded that this reporting unit was fully impaired; as a result, a goodwill impairment charge of $23.3 million was recorded in the current quarter. As a result of the impairment indicators, the Company also performed an impairment analysis with respect to its definite-long-lived assets at Discount Supplements, consisting of trade name and website intangibles and property and equipment. The fair value of these assets were determined using various income approaches. Based on the results of the analyses, the Company recorded impairment charges of $4.4 million on the trade name and website intangible assets and $0.6 million on property and equipment. All of the aforementioned charges totaling $28.3 million are recorded in long-lived asset impairments in the consolidated statement of operations. The aforementioned charges resulted in goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment for Discount Supplements being measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2015, which utilized a significant number of unobservable Level 3 inputs, such as future cash flow assumptions. See Note 6, "Fair Value Measurements," for a definition of Level 3 Inputs. Goodwill The following table summarizes the Company’s goodwill activity: Retail Franchising Manufacturing/ Wholesale Total (in thousands) Balance at December 31, 2014 $ 352,149 $ 117,303 $ 202,841 $ 672,293 Acquired franchise stores 1,363 — — 1,363 Translation effect of exchange rates (898 ) — — (898 ) Impairment charge (23,259 ) — — (23,259 ) Balance at September 30, 2015 $ 329,355 $ 117,303 $ 202,841 $ 649,499 Intangible Assets Intangible assets other than goodwill consisted of the following: Retail Brand Franchise Brand Operating Agreements Other Intangibles Total (in thousands) Balance at December 31, 2014 $ 500,000 $ 220,000 $ 119,012 $ 13,980 $ 852,992 Acquired franchise stores — — — 716 716 Amortization expense — — (4,990 ) (3,090 ) (8,080 ) Translation effect of exchange rates — — — (122 ) (122 ) Impairment charge — — — (4,361 ) (4,361 ) Balance at September 30, 2015 $ 500,000 $ 220,000 $ 114,022 $ 7,123 $ 841,145 The following table reflects the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for each major intangible asset: Weighted- Average Life September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Cost Accumulated Amortization Carrying Amount Cost Accumulated Amortization Carrying Amount (in thousands) Brands - retail Indefinite $ 500,000 $ — $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ — $ 500,000 Brands - franchise Indefinite 220,000 — 220,000 220,000 — 220,000 Retail agreements 30.3 31,000 (9,144 ) 21,856 31,000 (8,354 ) 22,646 Franchise agreements 25.0 70,000 (23,917 ) 46,083 70,000 (21,817 ) 48,183 Manufacturing agreements 25.0 70,000 (23,917 ) 46,083 70,000 (21,817 ) 48,183 Other intangibles 11.8 10,241 (4,286 ) 5,955 20,457 (7,427 ) 13,030 Franchise rights 3.0 6,959 (5,791 ) 1,168 6,243 (5,293 ) 950 Total $ 908,200 $ (67,055 ) $ 841,145 $ 917,700 $ (64,708 ) $ 852,992 The following table represents future estimated amortization expense of intangible assets with finite lives at September 30, 2015 : Years ending December 31, Estimated amortization expense (in thousands) 2015 (remainder) $ 2,110 2016 8,056 2017 7,496 2018 7,335 2019 7,250 Thereafter 88,898 Total $ 121,145 |