| ii |
| iii |
| 1 |
| ITEM 1. | | 1 |
| ITEM 2. | | 1 |
| ITEM 3. | | 1 |
| ITEM 4. | | 42 |
| ITEM 4A. | | 69 |
| ITEM 5. | | 70 |
| ITEM 6. | | 99 |
| ITEM 7. | | 104 |
| ITEM 8. | | 113 |
| ITEM 9. | | 116 |
| ITEM 10. | | 116 |
| ITEM 11. | | 133 |
| ITEM 12. | | 136 |
| 136 |
| ITEM 13. | | 136 |
| ITEM 14. | | 136 |
| ITEM 15. | | 137 |
| ITEM 16A. | | 138 |
| ITEM 16B. | | 138 |
| ITEM 16C. | | 138 |
| ITEM 16D. | | 139 |
| ITEM 16E. | | 139 |
| ITEM 16F. | | 140 |
| ITEM 16G. | | 140 |
| ITEM 16H. | | 140 |
| ITEM 16I. | | 140 |
| ITEM 16J. | | 141 |
| ITEM 16K. | | 141 |
| 143 |
| ITEM 17. | | 143 |
| ITEM 18. | | 143 |
| ITEM 19. | | 144 |
| 146 |
In this annual report, unless otherwise indicated:
| • | “Costamare”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, “us” or similar terms are used for convenience to refer to Costamare Inc., or any one or more of its subsidiaries or their predecessors, or to such entities collectively, except that when such terms are used in this annual report in reference to the common stock, the 7.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), the 8.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), the 8.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), the 8.875% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred Stock” and, together with the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”) or the context otherwise indicates, they refer specifically to Costamare Inc.; |
| • | currency amounts in this annual report are in U.S. dollars; and |
| • | all data regarding our fleet and the terms of our charters is as of February 12, 2025. |
We use the term “twenty foot equivalent unit” (“TEU”), the international standard measure of containers, in describing the capacity of our containerships. We use the term deadweight ton (“dwt”) in describing the size of dry bulk vessels. Dwt, expressed in metric tons, each of which is equivalent to 1,000 kilograms, refers to the maximum weight of cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements in this annual report (and in the documents incorporated by reference herein) that are not statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The disclosure and analysis set forth in this annual report includes assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events in a number of places, particularly in relation to our operations, cash flows, financial position, plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business and the markets in which we operate. These statements are intended as “forward-looking statements”. In some cases, predictive, future-tense or forward-looking words such as “believe”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “forecast”, “plan”, “potential”, “may”, “should”, “could” and “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. In addition, we and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements which are forward-looking statements, including in our periodic reports that we file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), other information sent to our security holders, and other written materials. We caution that these and other forward-looking statements included in this annual report (and in the documents incorporated by reference herein) represent our estimates and assumptions as of the date of this annual report (and in the documents incorporated by reference herein) or the date on which such oral or written statements are made, as applicable, about factors that are beyond our ability to control or predict, and are not intended to give any assurance as to future results.
Factors that might cause future results to differ include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | general market conditions and shipping industry trends, including charter rates, vessel values and the future supply of, and demand for, ocean-going containership and dry bulk shipping services; |
| • | our continued ability to enter into time charters with existing and new customers, and to re-charter on favorable terms our vessels upon the expiry of existing charters; |
| • | our future financial condition and liquidity, including our ability to make required payments under our credit facilities, and comply with our loan covenants; |
| • | our ability to finance our capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate activities; |
| • | risks related to our dry bulk operating platform, including uncertainty related to the introduction of a new line of business for the Company, the fact that the chartering-in and chartering-out of dry bulk vessels is inherently more volatile than traditional vessel ownership and risks associated with derivative instruments such as forward freight agreements and bunker hedging; |
| • | risks related to our leasing business, including uncertainty related to the introduction of a new line of business for the Company, as well as exposure to new financial, counterparty and legal risks; |
| • | the effects of a possible worldwide economic slowdown; |
| • | disruption of world trade due to rising protectionism or the breakdown of multilateral trade agreements; |
| • | environmental and regulatory conditions, including changes in laws and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities; |
| • | business disruptions and economic uncertainty resulting from epidemics or pandemics; |
| • | business disruptions due to natural disasters or other disasters outside our control; |
| • | fluctuations in interest rates and currencies, including the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies; |
| • | technological advancements in the design, construction and operations of containerships and dry bulk vessels and opportunities for the profitable operations of our vessels; |
| • | the financial health of our customers, our lenders and other counterparties, and their ability to perform their obligations; |
| • | potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, political events, sanctions, piracy or acts by terrorists and armed conflicts; |
| • | future, pending or recent acquisitions of vessels or other assets, the recent commencement of operations of our dry bulk platform, our business strategy, areas of possible expansion and expected capital spending or operating expenses, including the recent investment in a leasing business; |
| • | expectations relating to dividend payments and our ability to make such payments; |
| • | the availability of existing secondhand vessels or newbuild vessels to purchase, the time that it may take to construct and take delivery of new vessels or the useful lives of our vessels; |
| • | the availability of key employees and crew, the length and number of off-hire days, dry-docking requirements, fuel and insurance costs; |
| • | our anticipated general and administrative expenses, including our fees and expenses payable under our management and services agreements, as may be amended from time to time; |
| • | our ability to leverage to our advantage our managers’ relationships and reputation within the international shipping industry; |
| • | our ability to maintain long-term relationships with major liner companies; |
| • | expected cost of, and our ability to comply with, governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards, as well as requirements imposed by classification societies and standards demanded by our charterers; |
| • | any malfunction or disruption of information technology systems and networks that our operations rely on or any impact of a possible cybersecurity breach; |
| • | risks inherent in vessel operation, including perils of the sea, terrorism, piracy and discharge of pollutants; |
| • | potential liability from current or future litigation; |
| • | our business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations; and |
| • | other factors discussed in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report. |
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this annual report, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in our views or expectations or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
ITEM 1. | IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. | OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE |
Not applicable.
A. Reserved.
B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness |
Not applicable.
C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
Not applicable.
Risk Factor Summary
Industry Risks
| • | Our profitability will be dependent on the level of charter and freight rates in the international shipping industry which are based on macroeconomic factors outside of our control; |
| • | The market value of our vessels can fluctuate substantially over time, and if these values are low at a time when we are attempting to dispose of a vessel, we could incur a loss; |
| • | The international dry bulk industry is highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete successfully for charters on favorable terms with established companies or new entrants that may have greater resources and access to capital; |
| • | The operation of dry bulk vessels entails certain unique operational risks, which could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends; |
| • | Disruptions in global markets from terrorist attacks, regional armed conflicts, general political unrest and the resulting governmental action could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows; and |
| • | An increase in trade protectionism, the unravelling of multilateral trade agreements and a decrease in the level of China’s export of goods and import of raw materials could have a material adverse impact on our charterers’ business and, in turn, could cause a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. |
Risks Inherent in Our Business
| • | Delay in the delivery or cancelation of any secondhand vessels we may agree to acquire, or any future newbuild vessel orders, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and earnings; |
| • | We are dependent on our charterers and other counterparties fulfilling their obligations under agreements with us; |
| • | We may have difficulty properly managing our growth through acquisitions of new or secondhand vessels and we may not realize expected benefits from these acquisitions; |
| • | The increased volatility of our dry bulk operating platform may have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow; |
| • | Declines in the value of our derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements, could have an adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position; |
| • | Our investment in the leasing business exposes us to financial and counterparty risks, which could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flow; |
| • | Our managers may be unable to attract and retain qualified, skilled crews on our behalf necessary to operate our business or may pay rising crew wages and other vessel operating costs; |
| • | Fuel, or bunker, price fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders; |
| • | We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet, which may reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders; |
| • | The derivative contracts we have entered into to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currencies, bunker prices and freight rates can result in reductions in our stockholders’ equity as well as reductions in our income; |
| • | We are subject to regulation and liability under environmental and operational safety laws that could require significant expenditures and affect our cash flows and net income; |
| • | Our business depends upon certain members of our senior management who may not necessarily continue to work for us; |
| • | Our chairman and chief executive officer has affiliations with our managers and others that could create conflicts of interest between us and our managers or other entities in which he has an interest; |
| • | Our managers are privately held companies and there is little or no publicly available information about them; and |
| • | Being active in multiple lines of business, including managing multiple fleets, requires management to allocate significant attention and resources, and failure to successfully or efficiently manage each line of business may harm our business and operating results. |
Risks Relating to Our Securities
| • | The price of our securities may be volatile and future sales of our equity securities could cause the market price of our securities to decline; |
| • | Investors may view our having multiple lines of business, including ownership of multiple fleets, negatively, which may decrease the trading price of our securities; |
| • | Holders of Preferred Stock have extremely limited voting rights; and |
| • | Members of the Konstantakopoulos family are our principal existing stockholders and will effectively be able to control the outcome of matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote; their interests may be different from yours. |
Industry Risks
Our profitability will be dependent on the level of charter and freight rates in the international shipping industry which are based on macroeconomic factors outside of our control. The cyclical nature of the shipping industry may lead to volatile changes in charter rates, which may reduce our revenues and negatively affect our results of operations.
The ocean-going shipping industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates, freight rates and profitability. Our profitability is dependent upon the charter rates we are able to charge for our ships. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply of and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply of and demand for the consumer goods and major commodities carried by water internationally. We are exposed to changes in charter rates in both the containership and dry bulk markets through both traditional vessel ownership as well as our dry bulk operating platform.
Since the factors affecting the supply of and demand for containership and dry bulk vessels are outside of our control and are unpredictable, the nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in industry conditions are also unpredictable. A significant decrease in charter rates would adversely affect our profitability and cash flows and could decrease the value of our fleet.
The demand for containerships and dry bulk vessels has generally been influenced by, among other factors:
| • | supply of and demand for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products; |
| • | changes in the exploration or production of energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products; |
| • | the location of regional and global exploration, production and manufacturing facilities; |
| • | the location of consuming regions for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products; |
| • | the globalization of production and manufacturing; |
| • | global and regional economic and political conditions, including armed conflicts, terrorist activities, sanctions, embargoes, strikes, tariffs and “trade wars”; |
| • | economic slowdowns caused by public health events such as the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic or another epidemic; |
| • | natural disasters, developments and other disruptions in international trade; |
| • | changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including the distance cargo products are transported by sea, competition with other modes of cargo transportation and trade patterns; |
| • | environmental and other regulatory developments; |
| • | currency exchange rates; and |
Factors that influence the supply of containership and dry bulk vessel capacity include:
| • | the availability of financing; |
| • | the price of steel and other raw materials; |
| • | the number of newbuilding orders and deliveries, including slippage in deliveries; |
| • | the cost of newbuildings and the time it takes to construct a newbuild; |
| • | the number of shipyards and ability of shipyards to deliver vessels; |
| • | port and canal congestion; |
| • | scrap prices and the time it takes to scrap a vessel; |
| • | speed of vessel operation; |
| • | costs of bunkers and other operating costs; |
| • | the efficiency and age profile of the existing containership and dry bulk fleet in the market; |
| • | the number of vessels that are out of service, namely those that are laid-up, dry-docked, awaiting repairs or otherwise not available for hire; |
| • | the economics of slow steaming; |
| • | government and industry regulation of maritime transportation practices, particularly environmental protection laws and regulations; and |
| • | sanctions (in particular, sanctions on Iran, Russia and Venezuela, amongst others). |
These factors influencing the supply of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions.
Our ability to re-charter our vessels upon the expiration or termination of their current charters and to charter our vessels for which we have not yet secured charters and the charter rates payable under any renewal options or replacement or new charters will depend upon, among other things, the prevailing states of the containership and dry bulk charter markets. If the charter markets are depressed when our vessels’ charters expire or when we are otherwise seeking new charters, we may be forced to charter our vessels at reduced or even unprofitable rates, or we may not be able to charter them at all and/or we may be forced to scrap them, which may reduce or eliminate our earnings or make our earnings volatile.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Containership Timecharter Rate Index (a per TEU weighted average of six to twelve month time charter rates of 1,000 to 5,000 TEU vessels, and three year time charter rates of 6,800 TEU to 9,000 TEU vessels that is published in the Container Intelligence Monthly, calculated on a monthly basis by Clarksons Research Services Limited (“Clarksons Research”) (based on $/TEU for 1993=100)) increased by 163%, from 67.4 points in December 2023 to 176.9 points in December 2024. The increase in charter rates is mainly attributable to a 5.4% increase in the volume of containers transported due to increased demand and a respective increase of 17.7% in TEU-miles mainly due to container vessels rerouting around southern Africa to avoid the Suez Canal. Although charter rates increased this year, charter rates have decreased before. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2023, the Containership Timecharter Rate Index decreased by 36.3% on average due to the decrease of seaborne transported container volumes and the normalization of seaborne supply chains. Weak or volatile conditions in the containership sector may affect our ability to generate cash flows and maintain liquidity, as well as adversely affect our ability to obtain financing.
According to Clarksons Research, seaborne container trade (in terms of million TEU transported) grew by a compound annual growth rate of 2.6% per annum between 2015 (167.8 million TEU transported) and 2024 (211.6 million TEU transported). During this period, there have been two years, 2020 and 2022, at which seaborne container trade exhibited negative growth rates. More specifically, during 2020, volumes decreased by 1.6% due to the outbreak of COVID-19 and the respective supply chain inefficiencies it caused, whereas in 2022, volumes decreased by 3.6% following an increase of 6.4% in the previous year. Clarksons Research estimates an increase in seaborne container trade from 211.6 million TEU in 2024 to 217.6 million TEU in 2025. Furthermore, according to Clarksons Research, future supply as represented by the containership orderbook as of December 2024 amounted to 27.0% of the existing fleet capacity, higher than the respective percentage of 24.6% a year ago, representing one of the highest such percentages since 2011. Delivery of the vessels currently under construction may negatively affect time charter rates for both short- and long-term periods unless it coincides with an increase in the demand for seaborne transportation of container boxes.
We charter our dry bulk vessels primarily on short-term time charters, and therefore, we are exposed to changes in spot market rates, namely to short-term time charter rates and voyage charter rates, for dry bulk vessels; such changes may affect our earnings and the value of our dry bulk vessels at any given time. Conditions in the international dry bulk shipping market can be volatile and cyclical and have varied significantly over the last decade. During 2022, mainly due to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the COVID-19 lockdown policies in China and the emergence of inflationary pressures, demand for seaborne dry bulk trade softened and time charter rates for Capesize, Panamax, Supramax and Handysize vessels (as measured by the BCI, BPI-82, BSI-58 and BHSI-38 Indexes, respectively) dropped on average by 50% compared to 2021 levels. During 2023, the full removal of COVID-19 lockdown policies in China, the increased demand for thermal coal and the reduction of transit flows in the Panama Canal, among other factors resulted in an increase of 57% in time charter rates for the aforementioned categories. During 2024, and especially in the second half of the year, time charter rates for dry bulk vessels exhibited a significant decline resulting in a decrease of 52% for the year. Weak or volatile conditions in the dry bulk shipping sector may affect our ability to generate cash flows and maintain liquidity, as well as adversely affect our ability to obtain financing.
An oversupply of containership or dry bulk vessel capacity may reduce charter rates and adversely affect our ability to charter our vessels at profitable rates or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
An oversupply of large newbuild vessels and/or re-chartered containership capacity entering the market, combined with any decline in the demand for containerships, may reduce available charter rates and may decrease our ability to charter our containerships when we are seeking new or replacement charters other than for unprofitable or reduced rates, or we may not be able to charter our containerships at all. According to Clarksons Research, as of December 2024, the containership orderbook represented 27% of the existing fleet capacity, 74% of which was for vessels with carrying capacity in excess of 12,000 TEU.
The number of dry bulk vessels on order as a percentage of the dry bulk fleet in the water was at a level of 10.6% as of December 2024, but such number can quickly increase if multiple orders by industry participants and outside investors are placed. While the orderbook has consistently remained below or close to 10% since the beginning of 2020, dry bulk vessels older than 15 years represent 24% of all dry bulk vessels, which, coupled with stricter environmental regulations relating to fuel oil emissions, could lead to increased activity in newbuild orders for more fuel efficient vessels. If, due to an oversupply of dry bulk vessels, charter rates decline upon the expiration or termination of our current charters, we may only be able to re-charter those vessels at reduced rates or we may not be able to charter these vessels at all.
Risks inherent in the operation of ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation, which could adversely affect our expenses, net income, cash flow and stock price.
The operation of ocean-going vessels carries inherent risks. These risks include the possibility of:
| • | piracy or terrorist attacks including the Houthi seizures and attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea; |
| • | environmental accidents; |
| • | grounding, fire, explosions and collisions; |
| • | cargo and property loss or damage; |
| • | business interruptions caused by mechanical failure, human error, war, terrorism, disease and quarantine, political action in various countries or adverse weather conditions; and |
| • | work stoppages or other labor problems with crew members serving on our vessels, some of whom are unionized and covered by collective bargaining agreements. |
Such occurrences could result in death or injury to persons, loss of property or environmental damage, delays in the delivery of cargo, loss of revenues from or termination of charter contracts, governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business, litigation with our employees, customers or third parties, higher insurance rates, and damage to our reputation and customer relationships generally. Although we maintain hull and machinery and war risks insurance, as well as protection and indemnity insurance, which may cover certain risks of loss resulting from such occurrences, our insurance coverage may be subject to caps or not cover such losses, and any of these circumstances or events could increase our costs and lower our revenues. The involvement of our vessels in an environmental disaster may harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The market value of our vessels can fluctuate substantially over time, and if these values are low at a time when we are attempting to dispose of a vessel, we could incur a loss, which would adversely affect our financial condition and could impair our ability to pay dividends.
Containership and dry bulk vessel values can fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different factors, including:
| • | prevailing economic conditions in the markets in which our vessels operate; |
| • | reduced demand for containerships or dry bulk vessels, including as a result of a substantial or extended decline in world trade; |
| • | increases in the supply of vessel capacity; |
| • | changes in prevailing charter hire rates; |
| • | the physical condition, size, age and technical specification of the ships; |
| • | the costs of building new vessels; |
| • | changes in technology which can render older vessels obsolete; |
| • | the relative environmental efficiency of the vessel, as compared to others in the markets in which our vessels operate; |
| • | whether the vessel is equipped with an exhaust gas scrubber or not; and |
| • | the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing ships to respond to technological advances in vessel design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or standards, customer requirements or otherwise. |
The risk of realizing a loss on the sale of a vessel is greater during periods when vessel values are low compared to their historical levels. In the future, we may sell vessels under unfavorable conditions resulting in losses in order to maintain sufficient liquidity and to allow us to cover our operating costs. If the market values of our vessels deteriorate, we may be required to record an impairment charge in our financial statements, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
In addition, any such deterioration in the market values of our vessels could trigger a breach of certain covenants under our credit facilities, which could adversely affect our operations. If a charter expires or is terminated, we may be unable to re-charter the vessel at an acceptable rate and, rather than continue to incur costs to maintain the vessel, may seek to dispose of it. Our inability to dispose of the vessel at a reasonable price could result in a loss on its sale and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The international dry bulk industry is highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete successfully for charters on favorable terms with established companies or new entrants that may have greater resources and access to capital, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
The international dry bulk shipping industry is highly competitive, capital intensive and highly fragmented with virtually no barriers to entry. Competition arises primarily from other vessel owners, some of whom may have greater resources and access to capital than we have. In addition, we are a new entrant in the dry bulk industry and some of our competitors may have more experience and more established customer relationships. Competition among vessel owners for the seaborne transportation of dry bulk cargo can be intense and depends on the charter rate, location, size, age, condition and the acceptability of the vessel and its operators to the charterers. Many of our competitors have greater resources and access to capital than we have and operate larger fleets than we may operate, and thus they could be able to offer lower charter rates or higher quality vessels than we are able to offer. If this were to occur, we may be unable to retain or attract new charterers on attractive terms, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our operating results are subject to seasonal fluctuations, which could affect our operating results and the amount of available cash with which we service our debt or could pay dividends.
We operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter rates. This is particularly true for our dry bulk fleet. To the extent we operate vessels on short-term time charters, index-linked time charters and voyage charters obtained in the spot market, this seasonality may result in the future and has in the past resulted in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results which could affect our ability to pay dividends to our common stockholders. The dry bulk market is typically stronger in the fall and spring months in anticipation of increased consumption of coal and other raw materials in the northern hemisphere during the winter months and increased South American grain shipments during spring. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. As a result, our revenues may be weaker during the fiscal quarters ended March 31 and September 30, and, conversely, our revenues may be stronger in fiscal quarters ended June 30 and December 31.
The operation of dry bulk vessels entails certain unique operational risks, which could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends.
The operation of certain ship types, such as dry bulk vessels, has certain unique risks. With a dry bulk vessel, the cargo itself and its interaction with the ship can be a risk factor. By their nature, dry bulk cargoes are often heavy, dense, easily shifted, and may react badly to water exposure. In addition, dry bulk vessels are often subjected to battering treatment during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold), and small bulldozers. This treatment may cause damage to the vessel. Vessels damaged due to treatment during unloading procedures may be more susceptible to breach at sea. Furthermore, any defects or flaws in the design of a dry bulk vessel may contribute to vessel damage. Hull breaches in dry bulk vessels may lead to the flooding of the vessels’ holds. If a dry bulk vessel suffers flooding in its holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle the vessel’s bulkheads, leading to the loss of the vessel. If we are unable to adequately maintain our vessels, we may be unable to prevent these events.
Any of these circumstances or events may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends. In addition, the loss of any of our vessels could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator.
An increase in trade protectionism, the unravelling of multilateral trade agreements and a decrease in the level of China’s export of goods and import of raw materials could have a material adverse impact on our charterers’ business and, in turn, could cause a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our operations expose us to the risk that increased trade protectionism will adversely affect our business. Recently, government leaders have declared that their countries may turn to trade barriers to protect or revive their domestic industries in the face of foreign imports, thereby depressing the demand for shipping.
The U.S. government has made statements and taken actions that may impact U.S. and international trade policies, including tariffs affecting certain Chinese industries. Additionally, new tariffs may be imposed by the second Trump administration on imports from Canada, Mexico and China as well as on imports of steel and aluminum. It is unknown whether and to what extent new tariffs (or other new laws or regulations) will be adopted, or the effect that any such actions would have on us or our industry. If any new tariffs, legislation and/or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiated or, in particular, if the U.S. government takes retaliatory trade actions due to the ongoing U.S.-China trade tension, such changes could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Furthermore, the government of China has implemented economic policies aimed at increasing domestic consumption of Chinese-made goods. This may have the effect of reducing the supply of goods available for export and may, in turn, result in a decrease of demand for container shipping. Many of the reforms, particularly some limited price reforms that result in the prices for certain commodities being principally determined by market forces, are unprecedented or experimental and may be subject to revision, change or abolition.
Restrictions on imports, including in the form of tariffs, could have a major impact on global trade and demand for shipping. Specifically, increasing trade protectionism in the markets that our charterers serve may cause an increase in (i) the cost of goods exported from exporting countries, (ii) the length of time required to deliver goods from exporting countries, (iii) the costs of such delivery and (iv) the risks associated with exporting goods. These factors may result in a decrease in the quantity of goods to be shipped. Protectionist developments, or the perception they may occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions, and may significantly reduce global trade, including trade between the United States and China. These developments would also have an adverse impact on our charterers’ business, operating results and financial condition which could, in turn, affect our charterers’ ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and impair our ability to renew charters and grow our business. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The employment of our dry bulk vessels and the respective revenues depend on the international shipment of raw materials and commodities primarily to China, Japan, South Korea and Europe from North and South America, India, Indonesia, and Australia. Any reduction in or hindrance to the demand for such materials could negatively affect demand for our vessels and, in turn, harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. For instance, the government of China has implemented economic policies aimed at reducing the consumption of coal which may, in turn, result in a decrease in shipping demand. The level of imports to and exports from China could be adversely affected by changes in political, economic and social conditions or other relevant policies of the Chinese government. A reduction of exports from China or imports to China could cause a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Disruptions in global markets from terrorist attacks, regional armed conflicts, general political unrest and the resulting governmental action could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Terrorist attacks in certain parts of the world and the continuing response of the United States and other countries to these attacks, armed conflicts as well as the threat of future attacks or the spreading of armed conflicts, continue to cause uncertainty and volatility in the world markets and may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas and related conflicts in the Middle East, the seizures and attacks on vessels travelling through the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea by the Houthi and Iran, advances of ISIS and other terrorist organizations in the Middle East and Africa and political tension or conflicts in the Asia Pacific Region such as in the South China Sea and North Korea could disrupt supply chains, cause instability in the global economy and negatively impact global credit and equity markets, cause uncertainty and volatility in the global financial markets and may accordingly affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Houthi seizures and attacks on vessels traveling through the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea have impacted the global economy as some companies have decided to reroute vessels to avoid the Suez Canal and the Red Sea. This has caused concerns of supply disruption as well as the risk of one of our vessels being attacked or seized. If there is a reduction in Houthi attacks and companies return to the Suez Canal and Red Sea, additional tonnage could be released to the market and may put downward pressure on rates. Events in the Israel-Hamas conflict and related conflicts in the Middle East have created additional concerns of disruption as the conflict has broadened and may further escalate. In addition, should the situation in the Middle East deescalate and liner companies gradually return to the Suez route, the release of tonnage could distort the current supply and demand dynamics. These uncertainties, as well as future hostilities or other political instability in regions where our vessels trade, could trigger a new refugee crisis, affect trade volumes and patterns and adversely affect our operations, and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Downside risks to the world economy, international hostilities and trade friction which could affect advanced economies, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Global growth is subject to downside economic risks stemming from factors such as energy costs, fiscal fragility in advanced economies, monetary tightening in certain advanced and emerging economies, high sovereign, corporate and private debt levels, highly accommodative macroeconomic policies and increased volatility in debt and equity markets as well as in the price of fuel and other commodities. The current macroeconomic environment is also characterized by inflation, which caused the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks to increase interest rates in 2022 and 2023 and maintain them at a high level in 2024. Inflation and continued high interest rates may raise the cost of capital, increase our operating costs and generally reduce economic growth, disrupting global trade and shipping. Political events such as the continued global trade war between the U.S. and China, the economic impact of and global response to the emergence of a pandemic crisis such as COVID-19 or future epidemics and ongoing wars may disrupt global supply chains and negatively impact globalization and global economic growth, which could disrupt financial markets, and may lead to weaker consumer demand in the European Union, the United States and other parts of the world which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, global financial markets and economic conditions which remain subject to significant vulnerabilities, such as the deterioration of fiscal balances and the rapid accumulation of public debt, may be negatively impacted by the aforementioned conflicts and risks. Furthermore, certain banks that have historically been significant lenders to the shipping industry have reduced or ceased lending activities in the shipping industry. Any future tightening of capital requirements could further reduce lending activities. If this were to occur, we may experience difficulties obtaining financing commitments or be unable to fully draw on the capacity under our committed term loans in the future if our lenders are unwilling to extend financing to us or unable to meet their funding obligations due to their own liquidity, capital or solvency issues. We cannot be certain that financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all in the future. If financing becomes unavailable when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our future obligations as they come due. Our failure to obtain such funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders. In the absence of available financing, we also may be unable to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.
Further, we anticipate that a significant number of port calls made by our vessels will continue to involve the loading or unloading of cargoes in ports in the Asia Pacific region. In recent years, China has been one of the world’s fastest growing economies in terms of gross domestic product, which has had a significant impact on shipping demand. However, if China’s growth in gross domestic product and especially in industrial production continues to slow and other countries in the Asia Pacific region experience slower or negative economic growth in the future, this may negatively affect the economies of the United States and the European Union, and thus, may negatively impact shipping demand. Furthermore, trade friction could increase the volatility in the foreign exchange markets which could also negatively affect global trade. Such volatile economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Geopolitical risks may affect the ability of certain of our managers and service providers, which have offices in Greece to operate efficiently.
The location of the offices of our managers and service providers, as well as certain of our sub-managers’ offices in Greece exposes them to geopolitical risks related to Greece, such as a resurgence of influx of refugees. Although to date, these risks have not affected our managers’ operations, a serious regional crisis may have a material adverse effect on our operations in the future and may limit the ability of our managers and service providers with offices in Greece to operate. These limitations may include the ability of our Greek suppliers to fully perform their contracts, the ability of our Greek-based seafarers or shore employees to travel to and from our vessels and delays or other disruptions in the operation of our fleet.
Our financial and operating performance may be adversely affected by the continuation of COVID-19 or the occurrence of another epidemic and related governmental responses thereto.
Our business may be adversely affected by any new outbreaks of COVID-19 or occurrence of another epidemic that may emerge. The initial onset of COVID-19 introduced uncertainty into our operational and financial activities, resulting in numerous actions taken by governments and governmental agencies in an attempt to mitigate the spread or any resurgence of the virus, including travel bans, quarantines and other emergency public health measures such as lockdowns. We cannot predict whether and to what degree such measures will be reinstated in the event of any resurgence of COVID-19 or occurrence of another epidemic, which may adversely affect global economic activity and could have a material adverse effect on our future business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, the carrying value of our assets, the fair values of our vessels and our ability to pay dividends. The occurrence or reoccurrence of any of the foregoing events or other epidemics, an increase in the severity or duration of epidemics and pandemics or a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of an epidemic could have a material adverse effect on our future financial and operating performance.
Risks Inherent in Our Business
Delay in the delivery or cancelation of any secondhand vessels we may agree to acquire, or any future newbuild vessel orders, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and earnings.
As of February 12, 2025, we had no newbuild containerships under contract or any secondhand vessels that we had agreed to acquire, and all vessels we have agreed to acquire had been delivered, but we may contract for additional newbuild or secondhand vessels in the future. In 2022, we served notices of termination for eight newbuild vessels on order at a Chinese shipyard due to default by the shipyard and we are currently in arbitration with the shipyard in connection with the terminations. A delay by the seller or shipyard in the delivery date of any vessel we contract to purchase will reduce our expected income from that vessel and, if the vessel is already chartered, may lead the charterer of such vessel to claim damages or to cancel the relevant charter. If the seller of any vessel we contract to purchase is not able to build and/or to deliver the vessel to us as agreed, or if we cancel a purchase agreement because a seller has not met his obligations, it may result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The expected delivery dates under any shipbuilding contracts or purchase agreements we may enter into in the future, may be delayed or the relevant contract may be cancelled for reasons not under our control, including, among other things:
| • | quality or engineering problems; |
| • | breach of contract by, or disputes with, our counterparties; |
| • | changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards; |
| • | work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard; |
| • | bankruptcy of or other financial crisis involving the shipyard or other seller; |
| • | a backlog of orders at the shipyard; |
| • | sanctions imposed on the seller, the shipyard, or the vessel; political, social or economic disturbances; |
| • | weather interference or a catastrophic event, such as a major earthquake or fire, or other accident; |
| • | disruptions due to an epidemic or pandemic; |
| • | requests for changes to the original vessel specifications; |
| • | shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials, such as steel; |
| • | an inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals; |
| • | financial instability of the lenders under our committed credit facilities, resulting in potential delay or inability to draw down on such facilities; and |
| • | financial instability of the charterers under our agreed time charters for the newbuild vessels, resulting in potential delay or inability to charter the newbuild vessels. |
We are dependent on our charterers and other counterparties fulfilling their obligations under agreements with us, and their inability or unwillingness to honor these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and impair our ability to pay dividends.
Payments to us by our charterers under charter agreements are and will be our main source of operating cash flow. Such agreements subject us to counterparty risks. The ability and willingness of each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the maritime and offshore industries, the overall financial condition of the counterparty, charter rates received for specific types of vessels, and various expenses.
These risks are heightened for our containership agreements, as we derive our revenues from the containership sector from a limited number of customers in part through long-term time charters. Weakness in demand for container shipping services, increased operating costs due to changes in environmental or other regulations and the oversupply of large containerships as well as the oversupply of smaller size vessels due to a cascading effect places our liner company customers under financial pressure. Declines in demand and increases in liner companies’ operating costs could result in financial challenges to our liner company customers and may increase the likelihood of one or more of our customers being unable or unwilling to pay us contracted charter rates or going bankrupt.
If we lose a time charter because the charterer is unable to pay us or for any other reason, we may be unable to re-deploy the related vessel on similarly favorable terms or at all. Also, we will not receive any revenues from such a vessel while it is not chartered, but we will be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain and insure the vessel and service any indebtedness on it. The combination of any surplus of vessel capacity and the expected entry into service of new technologically advanced or more environmentally friendly vessels may make it difficult to secure substitute employment for any of our ships if our counterparties fail to perform their obligations under the currently arranged time charters, and any new charter arrangements that we may be able to secure could be at lower rates. Furthermore, the surplus of vessels available at lower charter rates and lack of demand for our customers’ services could negatively affect our charterers’ willingness to perform their obligations under our time charters, particularly if the charter rates in such time charters are significantly above the prevailing market rates. Accordingly, we may have to grant concessions to our charterers in the form of lower charter rates for the remaining duration of the relevant charter or part thereof, or to agree to re-charter vessels coming off charter at reduced rates compared to the charter then ended. While we have agreed in certain cases to charter rate re-arrangements entailing reductions for specified periods, we have been compensated for these adjustments by, among other things, subsequent rate increases and/or extended charter periods, so that the aggregate payments under the charters are not materially reduced, and in some cases we also have arranged for term extensions. However, there is no assurance that any future charter re-arrangements will be on similarly favorable terms.
The loss of any of our charterers, time charters or vessels, or a decline in payments under our time charters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
In addition to charter parties, we may, among other things, enter into shipbuilding contracts, contracts for the sale or purchase of secondhand vessels, provide performance guarantees relating to shipbuilding contracts, to sale and purchase contracts or to charters, enter into credit facilities or other financing arrangements, accept commitment letters from banks, or enter into insurance contracts or derivative contracts (including interest rate swaps, bunker swaps, exchange rate swaps, or forward freight agreements) or enter into joint ventures. Such agreements expose us to counterparty credit risk. The ability and willingness of each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend upon a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the state of the capital markets, the condition of the ocean-going shipping industry and charter hire rates. Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, we could sustain significant losses, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
A limited number of containership customers operating in a consolidating industry comprise the majority of our revenues. The loss of these customers could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and competitive position and further consolidation among our customers will reduce our bargaining power.
Our customers in the containership sector consist of a limited number of liner companies. A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S (“A.P. Moller-Maersk”), Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A. (“MSC”), members of the Evergreen Group (“Evergreen”), Hapag Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft (“Hapag Lloyd”), Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (“ZIM”) and Cosco Shipping Lines Co., Ltd. (“COSCO”) together represented 85%, 83% and 84% of our containership revenue in 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively. The tough economic conditions faced by these liner companies historically and the intense competition among them has caused, and may in the future cause, certain liner companies to default and is also leading to a consolidation among liner companies. We expect that the number of leading liner companies which are our client base may continue to shrink and we may depend on a more limited number of customers to generate a substantial portion of our revenues. The cessation of business with these liner companies or their failure to fulfill their obligations under the time charters for our containerships could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders. In addition to consolidations, alliances involving our customers could further increase the concentration of our business and reduce our bargaining power. In 2014, three of our subsidiaries participated in a restructuring agreement with one of our charterers whereby they agreed to charter hire reductions in exchange for equity and unsecured debentures which were eventually repaid in full and in certain cases charter period extensions.
We could lose a customer or the benefits of our time charter arrangements for many different reasons, including if the customer is unable or unwilling to make charter hire or other payments to us because of a deterioration in its financial condition, disagreements with us or if the charterer exercises certain termination rights or otherwise. If any of these customers terminate its charters, chooses not to re-charter our ships after charters expire or is unable to perform under its charters and we are not able to find replacement charters on similar terms or are unable to re-charter our ships at all, we will suffer a loss of revenues that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”.
We may have difficulty properly managing our growth through acquisitions of new or secondhand vessels and we may not realize expected benefits from these acquisitions, which may negatively impact our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
We expect to grow our business by ordering newbuild vessels and through selective acquisitions of secondhand vessels to the extent that they are available. Our future growth will primarily depend on:
| • | the operations of the shipyards that build any newbuild vessels we may order; |
| • | the availability of employment for our vessels; |
| • | locating and identifying suitable secondhand vessels; |
| • | obtaining newbuild or secondhand contracts at acceptable prices; |
| • | obtaining required financing on acceptable terms; |
| • | consummating vessel acquisitions; |
| • | enlarging our customer base; |
| • | hiring additional shore-based employees and seafarers; |
| • | continuing to meet technical and safety performance standards; and |
| • | managing joint ventures or significant acquisitions and integrating the new ships into our fleet. |
Ship values are correlated with charter rates. During periods in which charter rates are high, ship values are generally high as well, and it may be difficult to consummate ship acquisitions or enter into shipbuilding contracts at favorable prices. During periods in which charter rates are low and employment is scarce, ship values are low; however, any vessel acquired without an attached time charter will still incur expenses to operate, insure, maintain and finance, thereby significantly increasing the cash outlay. In addition, any vessel acquisition may not be profitable and may not generate cash flows sufficient to justify the investment. We may not be successful in executing any future growth plans and we cannot give any assurance that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with such growth efforts. Other risks associated with vessel acquisitions that may harm our business, financial condition and operating results include the risks that we may:
| • | fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as new customer relationships, cost-savings or cash flow enhancements; |
| • | be unable (through our managers) to hire, train or retain qualified shore-based and seafaring personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet; |
| • | decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions; |
| • | significantly increase our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions; |
| • | incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with any vessels or businesses acquired; or |
| • | incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges. |
If we fail to properly manage our growth through acquisitions of newbuild or secondhand vessels we may not realize expected benefits from these acquisitions, which may negatively impact our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
Future acquisitions of secondhand vessels may result in increased operating and maintenance costs.
Many of our containerships and all of the dry bulk vessels we have acquired are secondhand vessels. Unlike newbuild vessels, secondhand vessels typically do not carry warranties as to their condition. Depending on market conditions, we may purchase a secondhand vessel on an as-is basis based on the review of its records, but even when we do inspect secondhand vessels prior to purchase, such an inspection would normally not provide us with as much knowledge of a vessel’s condition as we would possess if it had been built for us and operated by us during its life. In addition, if a secondhand vessel is not in the condition promised or warranted by its seller and requires significant repairs, we may find it hard to be indemnified by the respective seller, which is typically a single-vessel shipowning company with no assets, other than their vessel sold, and no continuing operations, and which may even no longer be in existence when the damage or other deficiency is discovered. Repairs and maintenance costs for secondhand vessels are difficult to predict and may be substantially higher than for vessels which we had operated since they were built. In addition, variability in the age and type of secondhand vessels in our fleet may prevent us from attaining economies of scale in our operations and maintenance of our fleet, which may result in higher costs. These costs could decrease our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
The increased volatility of our dry bulk operating platform may have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow.
Our dry bulk operating platform that commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2022 represents a relatively new line of business for us. Uncertainties and risks related to our dry bulk operating platform include, but are not limited to, the fact that the chartering-in and chartering-out of dry bulk vessels is inherently more volatile than traditional vessel ownership and is subject to greater fluctuations based on many factors beyond our control, including global economic conditions, the dry bulk charter market, availability of cargoes to be transported on board the dry bulk vessels we charter-in, off-hire periods and timing delays in the performance of cargo transportation, bunker prices, marine disasters, environmental accidents, war, terrorism, piracy and other circumstances or events. Any such factors could reduce the demand for the chartering-in and chartering-out of dry bulk vessels and could therefore adversely affect our earnings and cash flow. In addition, our senior management team and managers have limited experience with the oversight of a dry bulk operating platform and may not successfully or efficiently manage this new line of business. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—General”.
Declines in the value of our derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements, could have an adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
Through our dry bulk operating platform, we use derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements in order to establish market positions on the freights market. We also use derivative instruments such as forward freight agreements, foreign exchange forwards and bunker swaps to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the charter market, foreign exchange rates and bunker prices. Furthermore, we use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to European Union Allowances within the context of EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme. As a result of such trades, we may incur losses on our derivative exposure that could have a material adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
Our investment in the leasing business exposes us to financial and counterparty risks, which could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
Since March 30, 2023, we are the controlling shareholder of Neptune Maritime Leasing Limited (“Neptune” or “NML”) which operates a leasing business. Neptune acquires and charters out on a bareboat basis vessels to customers (lessees) through wholly-owned subsidiaries. The leasing business finances part of its vessels’ acquisition cost using bank debt. The terms for obtaining finance may not match the terms for providing finance to its customers. For example, Neptune may pay a fixed interest rate to its lenders and receive a floating interest rate from its customers or vice versa. This may expose Neptune to interest rate risk and as a result, our revenues and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Further, the ability and willingness of each of our lessees to perform their obligations under the bareboat charter with the leasing business will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control. As a result, our revenues and results of operations may be adversely affected. These factors include:
| • | global and regional economic and political conditions; |
| • | supply and demand for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products; |
| • | developments in international trade; |
| • | changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including changes in the distances that cargoes are transported; |
| • | environmental concerns and regulations; |
| • | the number of newbuilding deliveries; |
| • | the improved fuel efficiency of newer vessels; and |
| • | the recycling rate of older vessels. |
In depressed market conditions, customers of the leasing business may no longer need a vessel that is chartered to them and may default on their obligations or they may seek to renegotiate the terms of their bareboat charters with the leasing business. Should a lessee fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, the leasing business could sustain significant losses which could have an adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow.
In addition, our containerships and dry bulk vessels may be subject to “sister ship” arrest in certain jurisdictions from creditors of the vessels that are bareboat chartered out.
Any failure of such lessees to meet their obligations to the leasing business or to third-parties, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on the leasing business or its properties and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
We may be unable to obtain additional debt financing for future acquisitions of newbuild and secondhand vessels, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition or may be unable to obtain such financing on favorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to borrow against the vessels in our existing fleet and any vessels we may acquire in the future largely depends on the existence of continued employment of the vessel and on the value of the vessels, which in turn depends in part on charter hire rates, the creditworthiness of our charterers and the duration of the charter. The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers, any defaults by them, any decline in the market value of our fleet and the lack of long-term employment of our vessels may materially affect our ability to obtain the additional capital resources that we will require to purchase additional vessels or may significantly increase our costs of obtaining such capital. Our inability to obtain additional financing or committing to financing on unattractive terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Our managers may be unable to attract and retain qualified, skilled crews on our behalf necessary to operate our business or may pay rising crew wages and other vessel operating costs, which may have the effect of increasing costs or reducing our fleet utilization which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Acquiring and renewing time charters depends on a number of factors, including our ability to man our vessels with suitably experienced, high-quality masters, officers and crews. Our success will depend in large part on our managers’ ability to attract, hire, train and retain suitably skilled and qualified personnel. In recent years, the limited supply of and the increased demand for well-qualified crew, due to the increase in the size of the global shipping fleet, has created upward pressure on crewing costs, which we bear under our time charters. Changing conditions in the home country of our seafarers, such as increases in the local general living standards or changes in taxation, may make serving at sea less appealing and thus further reduce the supply of crew and/or increase the cost of hiring competent crew. Unless we are in a position to increase our hire rates to compensate for increases in crew costs and other vessel operating costs such as insurance, repairs and maintenance, and lubricants, our business, results of operations, financial condition and our profitability may be adversely affected. In addition, any inability we experience in the future to attract, hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees could impair our ability to manage, maintain and grow our business. If we cannot attract and retain sufficient numbers of quality onboard seafaring personnel, our fleet utilization will decrease, which could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Fuel, or bunker, price fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
The price and supply of vessel fuel, known as bunkers, is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geo-political developments, supply and demand for oil, actions by members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) and other oil and gas producers, economic or other sanctions levied against oil and gas producing countries, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns and regulations.
The cost of fuel is a significant factor in negotiating charter rates and can affect us in both direct and indirect ways. This cost will be borne by us when our vessels are not employed or are employed on voyage charters. As of February 12, 2025, the majority of the vessels that we charter-in under our dry bulk operating platform are expected to be employed under voyage charters and we may enter into more such arrangements in the future, and to the extent we do so, an increase in the price of fuel beyond our expectations may adversely affect our profitability. Even where the cost of fuel is borne by the charterer, which is the case with all of our existing time charters, that cost may affect the level of charter rates that charterers are willing to pay.
A decrease in the cost of fuel may lead our charterers to abandon slow steaming, thereby releasing additional capacity into the market and exerting downward pressure on charter rates or may lead our charterers to employ older, less fuel efficient vessels which may drive down charter rates and make it more difficult for us to secure employment for our newer vessels.
In addition, the entry into force on January 1, 2020 of the 0.5% mass by mass (“m/m”) global sulphur cap in marine fuels under the International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships (“MARPOL”) Annex VI has led to a significant increase in the costs for low sulphur fuel used by vessels that are not equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers. Because the cost of fuel is born by our charterers for our vessels employed on a time charter basis or by ourselves when we charter-in vessels, which are generally not equipped with scrubbers, such vessels may be less competitive compared to vessels that are equipped with scrubbers. As of February 12, 2025, we owned 15 containerships and eight dry bulk vessels in the water that are equipped with scrubbers. As of February 12, 2025, we have chartered-in for a period, 50 dry bulk vessels through our dry bulk operating platform, 23 of which are equipped with scrubbers, of which three are vessels chartered-in from our owned fleet. Ships that are not retrofitted with exhaust gas scrubbers to comply with the new emissions standard may become less competitive (compared with ships equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers that can utilize the less expensive high sulphur fuel), have difficulty finding employment, command lower charter hire and/or need to be scrapped, which may negatively impact our revenues and cash flows as well as our future operations.
Reliance on suppliers may limit our ability to obtain supplies and services when needed and could result in additional off-hire days or delays in the repair and maintenance of our fleet which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and cash flows.
We rely on a significant number of third-party suppliers of consumables, spare parts and equipment to operate, maintain, repair and upgrade our fleet of ships. Delays in delivery or unavailability or poor quality of supplies could result in off-hire days due to consequent delays in the repair and maintenance of our fleet or lead to our time charters being terminated. This would negatively impact our revenues and cash flows. Cost increases could also negatively impact our future operations.
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet, which may reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet and replace, over the long-term, the operating capacity of our fleet and we generally expect to finance these capital expenditures with cash balances or credit facilities. In addition, we will need to make substantial capital expenditures to acquire vessels in accordance with our growth strategy. These expenditures could increase as a result of, among other things: the cost of labor and materials; customer requirements; the size of our fleet; the cost of replacement vessels; the length of charters; governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards relating to safety, security or the environment; competitive standards; and the age of our ships. Significant capital expenditures, including expenditures to maintain and replace, over the long-term, the operating capacity of our fleet, may reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
The aging of our fleet may result in increased operating costs in the future, which could adversely affect our earnings.
In general, the cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increases with the age of the vessel. As our fleet ages, we will incur increased costs. Older vessels may require longer and more expensive dry-dockings, resulting in more off-hire days and reduced revenue. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology or design. In addition, older vessels are often less desirable to charterers. Governmental regulations and safety or other equipment standards related to the age of a vessel may also require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which our vessels may engage.
As of February 12, 2025, our current fleet of 68 containerships in the water had an average age (weighted by TEU capacity) of 13.3 years, and our current fleet of 38 dry bulk vessels had an average age (weighted by dwt capacity) of 13.0 years. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”. We cannot assure you that, as our vessels age, market conditions will justify such expenditures or will enable us to profitably operate our older vessels.
Unless we set aside reserves or are able to borrow funds for vessel replacement, at the end of the useful lives of our vessels our revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As noted above, as of February 12, 2025, our current fleet of 68 containerships in the water had an average age (weighted by TEU capacity) of 13.3 years, and our current fleet of 38 dry bulk vessels, had an average age (weighted by dwt capacity) of 13.0 years. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”. Unless we maintain reserves or are able to borrow or raise funds for vessel replacement, we will be unable to replace the older vessels in our fleet. Our cash flows and income are dependent on the revenues earned by the chartering of our containerships and dry bulk vessels. The inability to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with existing charterers, establish relationships with new customers and obtain new time or voyage charters and COAs, for which we will face competition from new entrants and established companies that may have greater resources and access to capital.
One of our principal objectives is to acquire additional vessels in conjunction with entering into additional time charters for these vessels. The process of obtaining new time charters is highly competitive and generally involves an intensive screening process and competitive bids, and often extends for several months especially for long-term charters. Generally, we compete for charters based upon charter rate, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and vessel specifications, including size, age and condition.
In addition, as vessels age, it can be more difficult to employ them on profitable time charters, particularly during periods of decreased demand in the charter market. Accordingly, we may find it difficult to continue to find profitable employment for our vessels as they age.
We face substantial competition from a number of experienced companies, including liner companies in the containership sector, state-sponsored entities and financial organizations. Some of these competitors have significantly greater resources and access to capital than we do, and can therefore operate larger fleets and may be able to offer lower charter rates or higher quality vessels than we are able to offer. In the future, we may also face competition from reputable, experienced and well-capitalized marine transportation companies, including state-sponsored entities, that do not currently own containerships or dry bulk vessels, but may choose to do so. Any increased competition may cause greater price competition for time and voyage charters and Contracts of Affreightments (“COAs”), as well as for the acquisition of high-quality secondhand vessels and newbuild vessels. Furthermore, since the charter or freight rate is generally considered to be one of the principal factors in a charterer’s decision to charter a vessel, the rates offered by our competitors can place downward pressure on rates throughout the charter market. On the other hand, consolidation and the creation of alliances among liner companies have increased their negotiation power when chartering our vessels. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to charter our vessels, expand our relationships with existing customers or establish relationships with new customers on a profitable basis, if at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
We conduct a substantial amount of business in China. The legal system in China has inherent uncertainties that could limit the legal protections available to us and could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We conduct a substantial amount of business in China, including through our managers Navilands (Shanghai) Containers Management Ltd. and Navilands (Shanghai) Bulkers Management Ltd. which, as of February 12, 2025, operated 18 vessels that were mostly manned by Chinese crews, which exposes us to potential litigation in China. Additionally, many of our vessels regularly call to ports in China, and as of February 12, 2025, we have chartered nine of our containerships with Chinese charterers, while two of our dry bulk vessels was chartered with Chinese charterers. As of the same date, we have entered into sale and leaseback transactions in respect of 10 containerships with certain Chinese financial institutions. In 2022, we served notices of termination for eight newbuild vessels on order at a Chinese shipyard due to default by the shipyard. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet—Our Containership Fleet”.
The Chinese legal system is based on written statutes and their legal interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. Prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, the Chinese government has been developing a comprehensive system of commercial laws, and considerable progress has been made in introducing laws and regulations dealing with economic matters such as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce, taxation and trade. However, because these laws and regulations are relatively new, there is a general lack of internal guidelines or authoritative interpretive guidance, and because of the limited number of published cases and their non-binding nature, interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. Although the related charters, shipbuilding agreements and sale and leaseback agreements are governed by English law, we may have difficulties enforcing a judgment rendered by an arbitration tribunal or by an English court (or other non-Chinese court) in China. Such charters, shipbuilding agreements and sale and leaseback agreements, and any additional agreements that we enter into with Chinese counterparties, may be subject to new regulations in China that may require us to incur new or additional compliance or other administrative costs and pay new taxes or other fees to the Chinese government. In addition, China enacted a tax for non-resident international transportation enterprises engaged in the provision of services to passengers or cargo, among other items, in and out of China using their own, chartered or leased vessels, including any stevedore, warehousing and other services connected with the transportation. The law and relevant regulations broaden the range of international transportation companies which may find themselves liable for Chinese enterprise income tax on profits generated from international transportation services passing through Chinese ports. This tax or similar regulations by China may reduce our operating results and may also result in an increase in the cost of goods exported from China and the risks associated with exporting goods from China, as well as a decrease in the quantity of goods to be shipped from or through China, which would have an adverse impact on our charterers’ business, operating results and financial condition and could thereby affect their ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and to renew and increase the number of their time charters with us.
Changes in laws and regulations, including with regards to tax matters, and their implementation by local authorities could affect our vessels chartered to Chinese customers as well as our vessels calling to Chinese ports, our vessels built at Chinese shipyards and the financial institutions with whom we have entered into sale and leaseback transactions, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Adverse developments in the international shipping business could reduce our ability to service our debt obligations and pay dividends to our stockholders.
We rely, to a large extent, on the cash flow generated from charters for our vessels. An adverse development in the international container and dry bulk shipping industry would have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations and could also impair our ability to service debt or pay dividends to our stockholders.
Regarding our containership transportation business, if market conditions do not offer opportunities for long-term, fixed-rate charters, we may be forced to charter our vessels on shorter term charters at less predictable rates, adversely impacting our growth. As of February 12, 2025, the time charters of four of our containerships will expire in 2025. For two of the aforementioned four vessels, the charterer has options to extend the charter for an additional period of approximately 24 months. While we generally expect to be able to obtain time charters for our vessels within a reasonable period prior to their time charter expiry or delivery, as applicable, we cannot be assured that this will occur in any particular case, or at all. If conditions worsen, despite securing a short-term time charter, it may not be continuous, leaving the vessel idle for some days in between charters. If such a trend occurs, we may then have to charter more of our containerships for shorter periods upon expiration or early termination of the current charters. As a result, our revenues, cash flows and profitability would then reflect fluctuations in the short-term charter market and become more volatile. It may also become more difficult or expensive to finance or refinance vessels that do not have long-term employment at fixed rates. In addition, we may have to enter into charters based on changing market prices, as opposed to contracts based on fixed rates, which would increase the volatility of our revenues, cash-flows and profitability and, during a period of depressed charter rates, could also result in a decrease in our revenues, cash flows and profitability, including our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. If we are unable to re-charter these containerships or obtain new time charters at favorable rates or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Additionally, because we charter our dry bulk vessels primarily on short-term time charters and voyage charters, we are exposed to changes in spot market rates, namely to short-term time charter rates and voyage charter rates, for dry bulk vessels; such changes may affect our earnings and the value of our dry bulk vessels at any given time. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Our profitability will be dependent on the level of charter rates in the international shipping industry which are based on macroeconomic factors outside of our control. The cyclical nature of the shipping industry may lead to volatile changes in charter rates, which may reduce our revenues and negatively affect our results of operations.”
We are a holding company and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments.
We are a holding company and our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets, including our ships. We have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to pay our obligations and to make dividend payments depends entirely on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. The ability of a subsidiary to make these distributions could be affected by a claim or other action by a third party, including a creditor, or by the law of their respective jurisdiction of incorporation which regulates the payment of dividends. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, our board of directors may exercise its discretion not to declare or pay dividends.
Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or if there is no surplus, from the net profits for the current and prior fiscal year, or while a company is insolvent or if it would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend. We may not have sufficient surplus or net profits in the future to pay dividends, and our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds, surplus or net profits to make distributions to us. As a result of these and other factors, we may pay dividends during periods when we record losses and may not pay dividends during periods when we record net income. We can give no assurance that dividends will be paid in the future or the amounts of dividends which may be paid.
Our credit facilities or other financing arrangements contain payment obligations and restrictive covenants that may limit our liquidity and our ability to expand our fleet. A failure by us to meet our obligations under our credit facilities could result in an event of default under such credit facilities and foreclosure on our vessels.
Our credit facilities impose certain operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions in our existing credit facilities generally limit Costamare Inc., and our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
| • | pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividends; |
| • | purchase or otherwise acquire for value any shares of our subsidiaries’ capital; |
| • | make or repay loans or advances, other than repayment of the credit facilities; |
| • | make investments in or provide guarantees to other persons; |
| • | sell or transfer significant assets, including any vessel or vessels mortgaged under the credit facilities, to any person, including Costamare Inc. and our subsidiaries; |
| • | create liens on assets; or |
| • | allow the Konstantakopoulos family’s direct or indirect holding in Costamare Inc. to fall below 30% of the total issued and outstanding share capital. |
Our credit facilities also require Costamare Inc. and certain of our subsidiaries to maintain the aggregate of (a) the market value, (on a charter free or charter inclusive basis, as applicable), of the mortgaged vessel or vessels and (b) the market value of any additional security provided to the lenders, above a percentage ranging between 110% to 125% of the then-outstanding amount of the credit facility and any related swap exposure.
Costamare Inc. is required to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants to maintain minimum liquidity, minimum market value adjusted net worth, interest coverage and leverage ratios, as defined.
| • | the ratio of our total liabilities (after deducting all cash and cash equivalents) to market value adjusted total assets (after deducting all cash and cash equivalents) may not exceed 0.75:1; |
| • | the ratio of EBITDA over net interest expense must be equal to or higher than 2.5:1, however such covenant should not be considered breached unless the Company’s liquidity is less than 5% of the total debt; |
| • | the aggregate amount of all cash and cash equivalents may not be less than the greater of (i) $30 million or (ii) 3% of the total debt; and |
| • | the market value adjusted net worth must at all times exceed $500 million. |
A failure to meet our payment and other obligations could lead to defaults under our credit facilities. Our lenders could then accelerate our indebtedness and foreclose on the vessels in our fleet securing those credit facilities, which could result in the acceleration of other indebtedness that we may have at such time and the commencement of similar foreclosure proceedings by other lenders. If any of these events occur, we cannot guarantee that our assets will be sufficient to repay in full all of our outstanding indebtedness and we may be unable to find alternative financing. Even if we could obtain alternative financing, such financing may not be on terms that are favorable or acceptable. The loss of these vessels would have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition as well as on our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders. For additional information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Substantial debt levels may limit our ability to obtain additional financing and pursue other business opportunities or to pay dividends and may increase our cost of borrowing or cause us to issue additional equity securities which would be dilutive to existing shareholders.
As of December 31, 2024, we had outstanding indebtedness of approximately $2.1 billion, including the obligations under finance leases and other financing arrangements, and we expect to incur additional indebtedness as we grow our fleet or in order to cover its operational needs. This level of debt could have important consequences to us, including the following:
| • | our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available on favorable terms; |
| • | we may need to use a substantial portion of our cash from operations to make principal and interest payments on our debt, thereby reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for operations, future business opportunities and dividends to our stockholders; |
| • | our debt level could make us more vulnerable than our competitors with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy generally; and |
| • | our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions. |
Our ability to service our debt depends upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. We may not be able to refinance all or part of our maturing debt on favorable terms, or at all. If our operating income is not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or discontinuing dividend payments, reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all.
In the future we may change our operational and financial model by replacing amortizing debt in favor of non-amortizing debt with a higher fixed or floating rate without shareholder approval, which may increase our risk of defaulting on our indebtedness if market conditions become unfavorable.
The derivative contracts we have entered into to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currencies, bunker prices and freight rates can result in reductions in our stockholders’ equity as well as reductions in our income. There can be no assurance that these hedges will be effective as they depend on the credit worthiness of our counterparties.
We have entered into interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and cross currency swaps generally for purposes of managing our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates applicable to indebtedness under our credit facilities which were advanced at floating rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currencies. The amount of interest we may be required to pay may end up being higher than the amount we would have to pay had we not entered in such derivative contracts, depending on market circumstances. As of December 31, 2024, the aggregate notional amount of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps as of such date was $805.0 million. As of December 31, 2024, our obligations under fixed rate loans, finance leases and other financing arrangements, which were under fixed interest rates amounted to $713.1 million.
We have also entered into forward freight agreements to establish market positions and to hedge our exposure to dry bulk freight rates. We also entered into bunker swaps to hedge our exposure to bunker prices. The settlement amounts we may have to pay (or receive) at expiration of such derivative contracts (or whilst trading such derivative contracts) may be higher (or lower) than the amount we would have to pay (or receive), had we not entered into such derivative contracts, depending on market circumstances. Furthermore, we are exposed to basis risk on our forward freight agreements and bunker swaps that have been utilized for hedging, as the derivatives indices do not exactly match vessel or bunker real market characteristics. For instance, we may charter vessels that do not match with the freight forward agreements indices specifications, or we may enter into bunker swap contracts that are priced on different ports than where the actual bunker purchases will take place. Hence, we will not be in a position to perfectly hedge our freight and bunker market risk through forward freight agreements and bunker swaps.
From time to time, we also enter into certain currency hedges. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was engaged in 12 Euro/U.S. dollar contracts totaling $39.6 million. Furthermore, we have entered into two cross currency swaps for a notional amount of $122.4 million to hedge the foreign exchange exposure related to an unsecured bond loan that was fully prepaid in November 2024. There is no assurance that our derivative contracts or any that we enter into in the future will provide adequate protection (when traded for hedging purposes) against adverse changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, freight rates or bunker prices or that our counterparties will be able to perform their obligations. In addition, as a result of the implementation of new regulation of the swaps markets in the United States, the European Union and elsewhere over the next few years, the cost of interest rate and currency hedges may increase or suitable hedges may not be available.
While we monitor the credit risks associated with our counterparties and many of our derivative contracts are cleared through clearinghouses, there can be no assurance that these counterparties would be able to meet their commitments under our derivative contracts or any future derivative contract. The potential for our counterparties to default on their obligations under our derivative contracts may be highest when we are most exposed to the fluctuations in interest and currency rates such contracts are designed to hedge, and several or all of our counterparties may simultaneously be unable to perform their obligations due to the same events or occurrences in global financial markets.
To the extent our existing derivative contracts do not, and future derivative contracts may not, qualify for treatment as hedges for accounting purposes we would recognize fluctuations in the fair value of such contracts in our statement of income. In addition, changes in the fair value of our derivative contracts that qualify for hedge accounting are recognized in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss” on our balance sheet, and can affect compliance with the net worth covenant requirements in our credit facilities. Changes in the fair value of our derivative contracts that do not qualify for treatment as hedges for accounting and financial reporting purposes affect, among other things, our net income and our earnings per share. For additional information see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.
As a result of taking positions in derivative instruments, we may incur derivative exposure that could have a material adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position. We may incur losses on these derivative positions, and those losses could be material. For additional information see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Declines in the value of our derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements, could have an adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.”
Fluctuations in interest rates could result in financial losses for us.
We are exposed to a market risk relating to fluctuations in interest rates because the majority of our credit facilities bear interest costs at a floating rate based on SOFR. Significant increases in interest rates could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and our ability to service our debt. From time to time, we take positions in interest rate derivative contracts in order to manage our exposure to and risk associated with such interest rates fluctuations, however no assurance can be given that the use of these derivative instruments may effectively protect us from adverse interest rate movements. For example, between the start of 2022 to the end of 2023, SOFR increased from 0.05% to 5.38%, while during 2024, SOFR gradually decreased to 4.49%. As of December 31, 2024, our obligations under our secured credit facilities that bear interest at SOFR plus a margin amounted to $1,359.3 million. For additional information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Because we generate all of our revenues in United States dollars but incur a significant portion of our expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could negatively affect our results of operations.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a material impact on our financial performance. We generate all of our revenues in United States dollars, but a substantial portion of our vessels’ operating expenses are incurred in currencies other than United States dollars. This difference could lead to fluctuations in net income due to changes in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies, in particular the Euro. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies against which the United States dollar falls in value could increase, thereby decreasing our net income. While we may hedge some of this exposure from time to time, our U.S. dollar-denominated results of operations and financial condition and ability to pay dividends could suffer from adverse currency exchange rate movements. For additional information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Increased competition in technology and innovation could reduce our charter hire income and the value of our vessels.
The charter rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a number of factors, including the vessel’s efficiency, operational flexibility and physical life. Efficiency includes speed and fuel economy as well as reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, utilize related docking facilities and pass through canals and straits. Physical life is related to the original design and construction, maintenance and the impact of the stress of operations. If new vessels are built in the future that are more efficient or flexible or have longer physical lives than our vessels, competition from these more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect our ability to re-charter, the amount of charter hire payments that we receive for our vessels once their current time charters expire and the resale value of our vessels. This could adversely affect our revenues and cash flows, and our ability to service our debt or pay dividends to our stockholders.
We are subject to regulation and liability under environmental and operational safety laws that could require significant expenditures and affect our cash flows and net income.
Our business and the operation of our vessels are materially affected by environmental regulations in the form of international, national, state and local laws, regulations, conventions, treaties and standards in force in international waters and the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their registration, including regulations governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, water discharges, ballast water management and climate change. We may incur substantial costs in complying with these requirements, including costs for ship modifications and changes in operating procedures. Because such conventions, laws and regulations are often revised, it is difficult to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with such requirements or their impact on the resale value or useful lives of our vessels.
Environmental regulations may also require or cause a reduction in cargo capacity, vessel modifications or operational changes or restrictions, lead to decreased availability of or increased costs for insurance coverage relating to environmental matters or result in the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports. Under local, national and foreign laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, we could incur material liabilities, including obligations to pay for emissions allowances, cleanup obligations and claims for natural resource damages, personal injury and/or property damages in the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous materials from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. Violations of, or liabilities under, environmental requirements can also result in substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including criminal sanctions, and, in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels. Events of this nature or additional environmental conventions, laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flow, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
For example, the International Safety Management Code (the “ISM Code”) requires vessel managers to develop and maintain an extensive “Safety Management System” (“SMS”) and to obtain a Safety Management Certificate (“SMC”) verifying compliance with its approved SMS and a document of compliance with the ISM Code from the government of each vessel’s flag state. Failure to comply with the ISM Code may lead to withdrawal of the permit to operate or manage the vessels, subject us to increased liability, decrease or suspend available insurance coverage for the affected vessels, or result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Each of the vessels in our fleet, Costamare Shipping and each of our sub-managers is ISM Code-certified, although such certifications are subject to change or revocation.
Furthermore, on January 1, 2020, the emissions standard under MARPOL Annex VI for the reduction of sulphur oxides came into force. Compliance with this emissions standard requires either the installation of exhaust gas scrubbers, which allows the vessel to use the existing, less expensive, high sulphur content fuel, or fuel system modification and tank cleaning, which allows the vessel to use more expensive, low sulphur fuel. It is unclear how the emissions standard will affect the employment of vessels in the future, given that the cost of fuel is borne by our charterers for vessels employed on a time charter basis or us when we charter-in vessels. Our owned and chartered-in vessels which are generally not equipped with scrubbers may be less competitive compared to vessels that are equipped with scrubbers. As of February 12, 2025, we owned 15 containerships and eight dry bulk vessels that are equipped with scrubbers. As of February 12, 2025, we have chartered-in for a period 50 dry bulk vessels, out of which 23 are equipped with scrubbers, of which three are vessels chartered-in from our owned fleet. Ships not equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers may become less competitive (compared with ships equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers that can utilize the less expensive high sulphur fuel), may have difficulty finding employment, may command lower charter hire and/or may need to be scrapped.
In addition, on December 31, 2018, our European Union Member State-flagged (“EU-flagged”) vessels became subject to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on ship recycling (the “EU Ship Recycling Regulation” or “ESRR”) and exempt from the Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (the “European Waste Shipment Regulation” or “EWSR”) which had previously governed their disposal and recycling. The EWSR continues to be applicable to Non-European Union Member State-flagged (“non-EU-flagged”) vessels. As of December 31, 2024, 34 of our 106 vessels in the water were EU-flagged.
Under the ESRR, commercial EU-flagged vessels of 500 gross tonnage and above may be recycled only at shipyards included on the European List of Authorised Ship Recycling Facilities (the “European List”). As of December 31, 2024, all our EU-flagged vessels met this weight specification. The European List presently includes nine facilities in Turkey but no facilities in the major ship recycling countries in Asia. The combined capacity of the European List facilities may prove insufficient to absorb the total recycling volume of EU-flagged vessels. This circumstance, in tandem with a possible decrease in cash sales, may result in longer wait times for divestment of recyclable vessels as well as downward pressure on the purchase prices offered by European List shipyards. Furthermore, facilities located in the major ship recycling countries generally offer significantly higher vessel purchase prices, and as such, the requirement that we utilize only European List shipyards may negatively impact revenue from the residual values of our vessels.
In addition, the EWSR requires that non-EU-flagged ships departing from European Union ports be recycled solely in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries. In March 2018, the Rotterdam District Court ruled that the sales of four recyclable vessels by third-party Dutch ship owner Seatrade to cash buyers, who then reflagged and resold the vessels to non-OECD country recycling yards, were effectively indirect sales to non-OECD country yards, in violation of the EWSR. As a result, we may be subject to heightened risk of non-compliance, due diligence obligations and costs in instances where we sell older ships to cash buyers for vessel recycling.
Governmental regulation of the shipping industry, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, is expected to become stricter in the future. We believe that the heightened environmental, quality and security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers will lead to additional compliance obligations, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements and greater inspection and safety requirements for vessels. To comply with new environmental laws and regulations and other requirements that may be adopted, we may be required to incur significant capital and operational expenditures to keep our vessels in compliance, or to scrap or sell certain vessels entirely. For additional information see “Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview—Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance—Environmental and Other Regulations”.
Climate change and related legislation or regulations may adversely impact our business, including potential financial, operational and physical impacts.
Growing concern about the sources and impacts of global climate change has led to the proposal or enactment of a number of domestic and foreign legislative and administrative measures, as well as international agreements and frameworks, to monitor, regulate and limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. Although the Paris Agreement, which was adopted under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2015, does not specifically require controls on GHG emissions from ships, it is possible that countries will seek to impose such controls as they implement the Paris Agreement or any new treaty that may be adopted in the future. In the European Union, emissions are regulated under the EU Emissions Trading System (the “EU ETS”), an EU-wide trading scheme for industrial GHG emissions. In May 2023, EU ETS regulations were amended in order to include emissions from maritime transport activities in the EU ETS and to require the monitoring, reporting and verification of emissions of additional greenhouse gases and emissions from additional ship types. In January 2024, the EU ETS was extended to cover CO2 emissions from all large ships (of 5,000 gross tonnage and above) entering EU ports, and will apply to methane and nitrous oxide emissions beginning in 2026. As of January 1, 2025, the EU MRV Regulation 2015/757 was extended to cover offshore vessels and general cargo ships of over 400 gross tonnage. Shipping companies will need to buy allowances that correspond to the emissions covered by the system. Additional jurisdictions may adopt similar GHG emissions monitoring and reduction schemes in the future.
The EU has also enacted the FuelEU Maritime Regulation, which became effective on January 1, 2025. The regulation established uniform rules imposing a limit on the GHG intensity of the energy used onboard ships arriving at, staying within or departing from ports under the jurisdiction of an EEA country. It also established that from January 1, 2030, containerships and passenger ships will be required to connect to onshore power supply (OPS) or use zero-emission technology while at berth in a port of call under the jurisdiction of a member state. The Regulation requires reductions in the lifecycle GHG intensity of fuel measured on a Well-to-Wake (WtW) basis which will gradually increase over time, beginning with a 2% reduction in 2025, up to 80% by 2050.
In addition, as of January 2023, amendments to MARPOL Annex VI require ships to reduce GHG emissions using technological and operational approaches to improve energy efficiency and that provide important building blocks for future GHG emissions reduction measures. Under these regulations, vessels must calculate their Energy Efficiency Existing Ships Index (“EEXI”) and Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”), and vessels that receive poor ratings may incur additional regulatory burdens. These and other emission requirements present significant challenges for vessel owners and operators. To address any potential compliance challenges for some of our existing vessels, particularly the older ones, we may incur significant capital expenditures to apply efficiency improvement measures and meet the required EEXI threshold, such as steps associated with shaft/engine power limitation (power optimization), fuel change, energy saving devices and ship replacement. The EEXI and CII regulatory framework may also accelerate the scrapping of older tonnage, while the adoption of a shaft/engine power limitation as a measure to comply with such framework may lead to the continuing prevalence of slow steaming to even lower speeds. This, in turn, could result in the contracting/building of new ships to replace any reduction in capacity.
In July 2023, the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) adopted the 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships, a framework for Member States that established new mid-term emissions reduction goals and guidance. Implementation of the framework through regulatory measures may require additional capital expenditures to achieve compliance with new emissions reduction targets across the shipping sector and increased use of zero or near-zero GHG emission technologies, among other obligations.
These requirements and any adoption of additional climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the European Union, the United States or other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the international level, that restricts emissions of GHGs could significantly increase our operating costs, including for the purchase of emissions credits or penalties for our ships exceeding GHG emissions intensity requirements or applicable emissions thresholds, require us to make significant financial expenditures, including the installation of pollution controls, or reduce the value of our fleet, as well as have other impacts on our business or operations that we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Even in the absence of climate control legislation and regulations, our business and operations may be materially affected to the extent that climate change results in sea level changes or more intense weather events. For additional information see “Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview—Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance—Environmental and Other Regulations”.
We rely on our information systems to conduct our business, and failure to protect these systems against security breaches could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Additionally, if these systems fail or become unavailable for any significant period of time, our business could be harmed.
The safe and efficient operation of our business including, but not limited to, accounting, billing, disbursement, booking and tracking, vessel scheduling, vessel operations and managing our financial exposure is dependent on computer hardware and software systems. Information systems are vulnerable to security breaches by computer hackers and cyber terrorists. We rely on industry-accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain confidential and proprietary information maintained on our information systems. However, these measures and technology may not adequately prevent cybersecurity breaches, the access, capture or alteration of information by criminals, the exposure or exploitation of potential security vulnerabilities, the installation of malware or ransomware, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced data or data loss. In addition, the unavailability of the information systems or the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated for any reason could disrupt our business and could result in decreased performance and increased operating costs, causing our business and results of operations to suffer. Failure of critical systems on board a vessel such as failure of its propulsion system or its steering and navigation control systems due to breaches on vessel’s information systems entails a major safety risk and could lead to dangerous situations for the safety of the seafarers on board the vessel, the vessel and potentially threaten the environment. Our managers and service providers also rely on information systems to provide us with their services. Any significant interruption or failure of our, or one of our manager’s or service provider’s, information systems or any significant breach of security could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders. Furthermore, any changes in the nature of cyber threats might require us to adopt additional procedures for monitoring cybersecurity, which could require additional expenses and/or capital expenditures.
The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us, which could subject us to fines, penalties or subject us to litigation which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our vessels have called and we expect will continue to call in ports in South America and other areas where smugglers attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel and whether with or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims or penalties which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Increased inspection procedures, tighter import and export controls and new security regulations could increase costs and cause disruption of our business.
International shipping is subject to security and customs inspection and related procedures in countries of origin, destination and certain trans-shipment points. These inspection procedures can result in cargo seizure, delays in the loading, offloading, trans-shipment or delivery of containers, and the levying of customs duties, fines and other penalties against us.
Since the events of September 11, 2001, United States authorities have substantially increased container inspections. Government investment in non-intrusive container scanning technology has grown and there is interest in electronic monitoring technology, including so-called “e-seals” and “smart” containers, that would enable remote, centralized monitoring of containers during shipment to identify tampering with or opening of the containers, along with potentially measuring other characteristics such as temperature, air pressure, motion, chemicals, biological agents and radiation. Also, as a response to the events of September 11, 2001, additional vessel security requirements have been imposed, including the installation of security alert and automatic identification systems on board vessels.
It is unclear what additional changes, if any, to the existing inspection and security procedures may ultimately be proposed or implemented in the future, or how any such changes will affect the industry. It is possible that such changes could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us. Furthermore, changes to inspection and security procedures could also impose additional costs and obligations on our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of goods in containers uneconomical or impractical. Any such changes or developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the International Ship and Port Facilities Security Code (the “ISPS Code”). The ISPS Code requires vessels to develop and maintain a ship security plan that provides security measures to address potential threats to the security of ships or port facilities. Although each of our vessels is ISPS Code-certified, any failure to comply with the ISPS Code or maintain such certifications may subject us to increased liability and may result in denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Furthermore, compliance with the ISPS Code requires us to incur certain costs. Although such costs have not been material to date, if new or more stringent regulations relating to the ISPS Code are adopted by the IMO and the flag states, these requirements could require significant additional capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.
Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in loss of earnings.
A government of the jurisdiction where one or more of our vessels are registered could requisition for title or seize our vessels. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes its owner. Also, a government could requisition our vessels for hire. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a ship and effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although we would expect to be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of our vessels, the amount and timing of payment, if any, would be uncertain. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels may cause us to breach covenants in certain of our credit facilities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Acts of piracy and attacks on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect our business.
Acts of piracy and attacks have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in certain regions of the world, such as the South China Sea, the Malacca Strait, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. Piracy continues to occur in the Gulf of Aden, off the coast of Somalia, West Africa, and increasingly in the Gulf of Guinea. Furthermore, the seizures and attacks by the Houthi and Iran on commercial vessels in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea have impacted seaborne trade as many companies have decided to reroute vessels to avoid the Suez Canal and Red Sea. We consider potential acts of piracy to be a material risk to the international shipping industry, and protection against this risk requires vigilance. Our vessels regularly travel through regions where pirates are active. Crew costs could also increase in such circumstances. In the event that a vessel is seized and remains in captivity for a period exceeding 180 days, the charterers will terminate the charter and the insurance cover will expire. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from acts of terrorism, piracy, regional conflicts and other armed actions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends.
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur to our property or result from our operations.
The operation of any vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, fire, contact with floating objects, property loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of a marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental incidents. There are also liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. We procure insurance for our fleet of containerships and dry bulk vessels in relation to risks commonly insured against by vessel owners and operators. Our current insurance includes (i) hull and machinery insurance covering damage to our and third-party vessels’ hulls and machinery, (ii) war risks insurance covering losses associated with the outbreak or escalation of hostilities and (iii) protection and indemnity insurance (which includes environmental damage) covering, among other things, third-party and crew liabilities such as expenses resulting from the injury or death of crew members, passengers and other third parties, the loss or damage to cargo, third-party claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party property and pollution arising from oil or other substances.
We can give no assurance that we are adequately insured against all risks or that our insurers will pay a particular claim. Even if our insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to obtain a timely replacement vessel in the event of a loss of a vessel. Under the terms of our credit facilities, we are subject to restrictions on the use of any proceeds we may receive from claims under our insurance policies. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for our fleet. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have led to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. We may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which we receive indemnity insurance coverage. There is no cap on our liability exposure for such calls or premiums payable to our protection and indemnity association. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which, although we believe are standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could exceed our insurance coverage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. Any uninsured or underinsured loss could harm our business and financial condition. In addition, the insurance may be voidable by the insurers as a result of certain actions, such as vessels failing to maintain required certification.
We do not carry loss of hire insurance. Loss of hire insurance covers the loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods, such as those that occur during an unscheduled dry-docking due to damage to the vessel from accidents. Accordingly, any loss of a vessel or any extended period of vessel off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
Our charterers may engage in legally permitted trading in locations which may still be subject to sanctions or boycott, such as Iran. Our insurers may be contractually or by operation of law prohibited from honoring our insurance contract for such trading, which could result in reduced insurance coverage for losses incurred by the related vessels. Furthermore, our insurers and we may be prohibited from posting or otherwise be unable to post security in respect of any incident in such locations, resulting in the loss of use of the relevant vessel and negative publicity for our Company which could negatively impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and share price.
Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flows.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers or receivers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages, including, in some jurisdictions, for debts incurred by previous owners. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien-holder may enforce its lien by arresting a vessel. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels, if such arrest or attachment is not timely discharged, could cause us to default on a charter or breach covenants in certain of our credit facilities, could interrupt our cash flows and could require us to pay large sums of money to have the arrest or attachment lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel that is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another of our vessels or to other vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Compliance with safety and other requirements imposed by classification societies may be very costly and may adversely affect our business.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the classification society. Every vessel must comply with all applicable international conventions and the regulations of the vessel’s flag state as verified by a classification society and must successfully undergo periodic surveys, including annual, intermediate and special surveys. If any vessel does not maintain its class, it will lose its insurance coverage and therefore will be unable to trade, and the vessel’s owner will be in breach of relevant covenants under its financing arrangements. Failure to maintain the class of one or more of our vessels could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, as well as our cash flows, including cash available to pay dividends to stockholders.
Our business depends upon certain members of our senior management who may not necessarily continue to work for us.
Our future success depends to a significant extent upon our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, certain members of our senior management and our managers and service providers. Mr. Konstantakopoulos has substantial experience in the container shipping industry and has worked with us and our managers for many years. He, our managers and certain of our senior management team are crucial to the execution of our business strategies and to the growth and development of our business. If these individuals were no longer to be affiliated with us or our managers, or if we were to otherwise cease to receive services from them, we may be unable to recruit other employees with equivalent talent and experience, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our arrangements with our chief executive officer restrict his ability to compete with us, and such restrictive covenants generally may be unenforceable.
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, our chairman and chief executive officer, entered into a restrictive covenant agreement with us on November 3, 2010, which was amended and restated on July 1, 2021, under which, during the period of Mr. Konstantakopoulos’ employment or service with us and for six months thereafter, Mr. Konstantakopoulos will agree to restrictions on his ownership and acquisition of interests in any containership or dry bulk vessel, and any business involved in the ownership of containerships or dry bulk vessels, subject to certain exceptions, including (i) pursuant to his involvement with us, (ii) with respect to certain acquisitions that we are first given the opportunity to make and (iii) interests acquired prior to entering into the restrictive covenant agreement.
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos has also agreed that if one of our vessels and a vessel majority owned directly or indirectly by him are both available and meet the criteria for an available charter, our vessel will be offered such charter. Such priority chartering obligation currently applies in respect of one containership and one dry bulk vessel privately owned or controlled by Mr. Konstantakopoulos, but does not apply to five containerships and one dry bulk vessel owned by companies in which Mr. Konstantakopoulos holds a passive interest, including one containership where one of our non-independent board members also holds a minority interest. This could give rise to a conflict of interest, which could adversely impact our results of operations.
We also cannot rule out the possibility that our board of directors will grant waivers to the restrictive covenant agreement. These restrictions have been waived by the Board of Directors or do not apply with respect to six containerships and two dry bulk vessels in which Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos has an interest, with no such waivers occurring in the year ending December 31, 2024. For more information on the restrictive covenant agreement, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos Restrictive Covenant Agreement”.
In addition, the restrictive covenant agreement is governed by English law, and English law generally does not favor the enforcement of such restrictions which are considered contrary to public policy and facially are void for being in restraint of trade. Our ability to enforce these restrictions, should it ever become necessary, will depend upon us establishing that there is a legitimate proprietary interest that is appropriate to protect, and that the protection sought is no more than is reasonable, having regard to the interests of the parties and the public interest. We cannot give any assurance that a court would enforce the restrictions as written by way of an injunction or that we could necessarily establish a case for damages as a result of a violation of the restrictive covenants agreement.
Our chairman and chief executive officer has affiliations with our managers and others that could create conflicts of interest between us and our managers or other entities in which he has an interest.
Pursuant to the Framework Agreement between Costamare Shipping Company S.A. (“Costamare Shipping”) and us dated November 2, 2015, as most recently amended and restated on June 28, 2021 and as further amended on December 12, 2024 (the “Framework Agreement”), the Services Agreement between Costamare Shipping Services Ltd. (“Costamare Services”) and our vessel-owning subsidiaries dated November 2, 2015, as amended and restated on June 28, 2021 and as further amended on December 12, 2024 (the “Services Agreement”) and the separate ship-management agreements pertaining to each vessel, our managers provide us with, among other things, commercial, technical and other services. Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos alone or together with a member of his family. As of February 12, 2025, Costamare Shipping is also the manager of one container vessel, one dry bulk vessel and three offshore vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer. Additionally, Costamare Services provides post fixture services in respect of one container vessel partly owned by our chairman and chief executive officer. Starting in February 2024, certain of our vessel-owning subsidiaries appointed Navilands Container Management Ltd. and, Navilands Bulker Management Ltd., (together, “Navilands”) as managers to provide their vessels, together with Costamare Shipping, with technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase, accounting and insurance services pursuant to separate ship-management agreements between each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries and Navilands. Navilands Container Management Ltd. and Navilands Bulker Management Ltd. may subcontract certain services to and enter into a relevant sub-management agreement with Navilands (Shanghai) Containers Management Ltd. and Navilands (Shanghai) Bulkers Management Ltd. (together, “Navilands (Shanghai)”) respectively. Navilands and Navilands (Shanghai) are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, and a non-independent board member is a minority shareholder. In addition, our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, owns 50% of Blue Net Chartering GmbH & Co. KG (“Blue Net”) which provides charter brokerage services to our containerships under a brokerage agreement (the “Brokerage Agreement”) and of Blue Net Chartering Asia Pte. Ltd. (“Blue Net Asia”) which provides charter brokerage services to our containerships on a case by case basis. Blue Net does not provide its services to the vessels for which charter brokerage services are being provided by Blue Net Asia. Pursuant to agreements dated November 14, 2022, as most recently amended and restated on December 16, 2024, Costamare Bulkers Services GmbH (“Local Agency A”), Costamare Bulkers Services ApS (“Local Agency B”) and Costamare Bulkers Services Pte. Ltd. (“Local Agency C”) and pursuant to the agreement dated November 20, 2023, as amended and restated on December 16, 2024 (together, the “Agency Agreements”), Costamare Bulkers Services Co., Ltd. (“Local Agency D” and together with Local Agency A, Local Agency B and Local Agency C, the “Agency Companies”) provide chartering and other services to Costamare Bulkers Inc. (“Costamare Bulkers” or “CBI”). Local Agency A, Local Agency B and Local Agency D are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. Local Agency C is controlled by our chief financial officer, Gregory Zikos. CBI provides a tax indemnity under a deed (the “Tax Indemnity Deed”) to Local Agency C with respect to certain disputes with local tax authorities. The terms of the Framework Agreement, the Services Agreement, the separate ship management agreements, the Brokerage Agreement, the Agency Agreements and the Tax Indemnity Deed were not negotiated at arm’s length by non-related third parties. Accordingly, the terms may be less favorable to the Company than if such terms were obtained from a non-related third party. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Management of Our Fleet” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreements”.
Additionally, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, our chairman and chief executive officer, is the owner as of February 12, 2025 of approximately 28.8% of our common stock, and this relationship could create conflicts of interest between us, on the one hand, and our affiliated managers or service providers, on the other hand. These conflicts, which are addressed in the Framework Agreement, the Services Agreement, the separate ship management agreements, the Agency Agreements, the Brokerage Agreement and the restrictive covenant agreement between us and our chairman and chief executive officer, may arise in connection with the chartering, purchase, sale and operation of the vessels in our fleet versus vessels owned or chartered-in by other companies, including companies affiliated with our chairman and chief executive officer. These conflicts of interest may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Management of Our Fleet” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions— Restrictive Covenant Agreements”.
In addition, in connection with Costamare’s investment in the leasing business, Neptune entered into an Amended and Restated Management Services Agreement (the “Neptune Management Agreement”) with Neptune Global Financing Limited (the “Neptune Manager”). Neptune Global Financing Limited is 51% owned by Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. The terms of the Neptune Management Agreement were not negotiated at arm’s length by non-related third parties. Accordingly, the terms may be less favorable to the Company than if such terms were obtained from a non-related third party. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Other Transactions”.
Our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, privately owns one containership (which is comparable to two of our vessels) and holds a passive interest in certain companies that own five containerships (which are comparable to 22 of our vessels), including one containership where one of our non-independent board members also holds a minority interest. Mr. Konstantakopoulos also has a controlling interest in a company that owns one dry bulk vessel (which is comparable to six of our vessels) and holds a passive interest, together with a member of his family, in a business involved in the ownership of one dry bulk vessel (which is comparable to 18 of our vessels). Mr. Konstantakopoulos may acquire additional vessels. Additionally, one of our non-independent board members holds a minority interest in a company that owns a containership comparable to four of our vessels and may acquire additional vessels. These vessels may compete with the Company’s vessels for chartering opportunities. These investments were entered into following the review and approval of our Audit Committee and Board of Directors. “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Other Transactions”.
Certain of our managers are permitted to, and are actively seeking to, provide management services to vessels owned by third parties that compete with us, which could result in conflicts of interest or otherwise adversely affect our business.
Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services have provided in the past and may provide in the future management services and other services in respect of the Joint Venture vessels (as defined in “Item 4. Information on the Company––Business Overview––Our Fleet––Framework Deed”) as well as to containerships, dry bulk and other vessels owned by entities controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, or members of his family and their affiliates that are similar to and may compete with our vessels. V.Ships Greece, Navilands, Navilands (Shanghai), HanseContor Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG (“HanseContor”), FML Ship Management Ltd. (“FML”) and F. A. Vinnen & Co. (GmbH & Co. KG) (“Vinnen”) provide or may provide services to third parties. Blue Net and Blue Net Asia provide brokerage services to third-party vessels, including vessels that are similar to and compete with our vessels. These third-party vessels include vessels owned by Peter Döhle Schiffahrts- KG, a German integrated ship owner and manager, which also controls 50% of Blue Net and Blue Net Asia. Our managers’ provision of management services to third parties, including related parties, that may compete with our vessels could give rise to conflicts of interest or adversely affect the ability of these managers to provide the level of service that we require. Conflicts of interest with respect to certain services, including sale and purchase and chartering activities, among others, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our managers are privately held companies and there is little or no publicly available information about them.
The ability of our managers to continue providing services for our benefit will depend in part on their own financial strength. Circumstances beyond our control could impair our managers’ financial strength, and because they are privately held companies, information about their financial strength is not publicly available. As a result, an investor in our stock might have little advance warning of problems affecting any of our managers, even though these problems could have a material adverse effect on us. As part of our reporting obligations as a public company, we will disclose information regarding our managers that has a material impact on us to the extent that we become aware of such information.
We depend on our managers to operate and expand our business and compete in our markets.
Pursuant to the Framework Agreement, the Services Agreement and the separate ship-management agreements pertaining to each vessel, our managers provide us with, among other things, commercial, technical and other services. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Management of Our Fleet” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreements”. Our operational success and ability to execute our growth strategy depends significantly upon our managers’ satisfactory performance of these services. Our business will be harmed if such entities fail to perform these services satisfactorily or if they stop providing these services.
Costamare Shipping, one of our managers, also owns the Costamare trademarks, which consist of the name “COSTAMARE” and the Costamare logo, and has agreed to license each trademark to us on a royalty free basis for the life of the Framework Agreement. If the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement were to be terminated or if their terms were to be altered, our business could be adversely affected, as we may not be able to immediately replace such services, and even if replacement services were immediately available, the terms offered could be less favorable than the ones offered by our managers.
Our ability to compete for and enter into new time charters or potential voyage charters and to expand our relationships with our existing charterers depends largely on our relationship with our managers and their reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If our managers suffer material damage to their reputation or relationships, it may harm the ability of us or our subsidiaries to:
| • | renew existing charters upon their expiration; |
| • | successfully enter into sale and purchase transactions and interact with shipyards; |
| • | obtain financing and other contractual arrangements with third parties on commercially acceptable terms (therefore potentially increasing operating expenditure for the fleet); |
| • | maintain satisfactory relationships with our charterers and suppliers; |
| • | operate our fleet efficiently; or |
| • | successfully execute our business strategies. |
If our ability to do any of the things described above is impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, as well as our cash flows.
Being active in multiple lines of business, including managing multiple fleets, requires management to allocate significant attention and resources, and failure to successfully or efficiently manage each line of business may harm our business and operating results.
Our dry bulk operating platform commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2022, and in the first quarter of 2023 we entered into a leasing business. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—General.” In addition, our fleet consists of both containerships and dry bulk vessels following our entry into the dry bulk business in 2021. Containerships and dry bulk vessels operate in different markets with different chartering characteristics and different customer bases. Our management team must devote significant attention and resources to different lines of business as well as to both our containership and dry bulk fleets, and the time spent on each business will vary significantly from time to time depending on various circumstances and needs of each business. Each business requires significant attention from our management and could divert resources away from the day-to-day management of the other business, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our vessels may call at ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the United States government, the European Union, the United Nations and other governments, which could negatively affect the trading price of our shares of common stock.
The United States, the European Union, the United Nations and other governments and their agencies impose sanctions and embargoes on certain countries and maintain lists of countries, individuals or entities they consider to be state sponsors of terrorism, involved in prohibited development of certain weapons or engaged in human rights violations. From time to time on charterers’ instructions, our vessels have called and may again call at ports located in countries that have been subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States, the European Union, the United Nations and other governments and their agencies, including ports in Iran, Syria and Sudan.
The sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended, strengthened or lifted over time. The United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury principally apply, with limited exception, to U.S. persons (defined as any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, or any person in the United States) only, not to non-U.S. companies. The United States can, however, extend sanctions liability to non-U.S. persons, including non-U.S. companies, such as our Company.
For example, in 2010, the United States enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act (“CISADA”), which expanded the scope of the former Iran Sanctions Act. Among other things, CISADA expands the application of the prohibitions to non-U.S. companies, such as the Company, and introduces limits on the ability of companies and persons to do business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of refined petroleum or petroleum products. In 2012, President Obama signed Executive Order 13608 which prohibits foreign persons from violating or attempting to violate or causing a violation of any sanctions in effect against Iran or facilitating any deceptive transactions for or on behalf of any person subject to U.S. sanctions. The Secretary of the Treasury may prohibit any transactions or dealings, including any U.S. capital markets financing, involving any person found to be in violation of Executive Order 13608. Also in 2012, the U.S. enacted the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (the “ITRA”), which created new sanctions and strengthened existing sanctions. Among other things, the ITRA intensifies sanctions regarding the provision of goods, services, infrastructure or technology to Iran’s petroleum or petrochemical sector. The ITRA also includes a provision requiring the President of the United States to impose five or more sanctions from Section 6(a) of the Iran Sanctions Act, as amended, on a person the President determines is a controlling beneficial owner of, or otherwise owns, operates, or controls or insures a vessel that was used to transport crude oil from Iran to another country and (1) if the person is a controlling beneficial owner of the vessel, the person had actual knowledge the vessel was so used or (2) if the person otherwise owns, operates, or controls or insures the vessel, the person knew or should have known the vessel was so used. Such a person could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including exclusion from U.S. capital markets, exclusion from financial transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and exclusion of that person’s vessels from U.S. ports for up to two years. The ITRA also includes a requirement that issuers of securities must disclose to the SEC in their annual and quarterly reports filed after February 6, 2013 if the issuer or “any affiliate” has “knowingly” engaged in certain sanctioned activities involving Iran during the timeframe covered by the report. In January 2013, the U.S. enacted the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (the “IFCA”), which expanded the scope of U.S. sanctions on any person that is part of Iran’s energy, shipping or shipbuilding sector and operators of ports in Iran, and imposes penalties on any person who facilitates or otherwise knowingly provides significant financial, material or other support to these entities.
In 2022, in response to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the United States and several European countries imposed various economic sanctions against Russia, prohibitions on imports of Russian energy products, including crude oil, petroleum, petroleum fuels, oils, liquefied natural gas and coal, prohibitions on the maritime transport of Russian oil and petroleum products that are purchased at or above a certain price, and prohibitions on investments in the Russian energy sector by U.S. persons, among other restrictions. Additionally, the ongoing conflict could result in the imposition of further economic sanctions by the United States and the European Union against Russia.
The United States can also remove sanctions it has previously imposed. On January 16, 2016, the United States suspended certain sanctions against Iran applicable to non-U.S. companies, such as the Company, pursuant to the nuclear agreement reached between Iran, China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union. To implement these changes, beginning on January 16, 2016, the United States waived enforcement as to non-U.S. companies of many of the sanctions against Iran’s energy and petrochemical sectors described above, among other things, including certain provisions of CISADA, ITRA, and IFCA. However, in May 2018, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and almost all of the U.S. sanctions waived and lifted in January 2016 were reinstated in August 2018 and November 2018, respectively. In addition, in May 2019 and January 2020, additional sectors of the Iranian economy became subject to sanctions. The May 2019 sanctions targeted the iron, steel, aluminum and copper sectors of Iran, and the January 2020 sanctions targeted the construction, mining, manufacturing and textiles sectors of Iran. These sanctions also encompass significant transactions to sell, supply or transfer to Iran goods or services related to the aforementioned sanctioned sectors.
From January 2011 through December 2024, vessels in our fleet made a total of 206 calls to ports in Iran, Syria and Sudan, representing approximately 0.28% of our approximately 72,710 calls on worldwide ports, including calls made by vessels owned pursuant to the Framework Deed as defined below, and may again call on ports located in countries subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States government as state sponsors of terrorism. However, in 2024, 2023 and 2022, none of our vessels, including vessels owned pursuant to the Framework Deed, made any calls to ports in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria or Sudan. Although we believe that we were and are in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations through the implementation of a Company-wide sanctions policy, and intend to continue to maintain such compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be expanded and subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines or other penalties, could limit our ability to trade to the United States and other countries or charter our vessels, could limit our ability to obtain financing and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in the Company. In addition, if we have a casualty in sanctioned locations, including Iran, our underwriters may not provide required security, which could lead to the detention and subsequent loss of our vessel and the imprisonment of our crew, and our insurance policies may not cover the costs and losses associated with the incident. Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their interest, or not to invest, in the Company simply because we do business with companies that do business in sanctioned countries. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that may involve our vessels, and could result in fines or other penalties against the Company for failing to prevent those violations, could limit our ability to trade to the United States and other countries or charter our vessels, could limit our ability to obtain financing and could, in turn, negatively affect our reputation. Investor perception of the value of our common stock may also be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries.
Further, on January 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Defense released an update to its list of “Chinese military companies” that are “operating directly or indirectly in the United States” in accordance with Section 1260H of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. Effective June 30, 2026, entities on this list and their controlled affiliates will be prohibited from entering into contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense for the procurement of goods, services, or technology, and effective June 30, 2027, the U.S. Department of Defense will be prohibited from purchasing goods or services produced or developed by entities on the list indirectly through third parties. In addition, entities on the list and their subsidiaries are prohibited from receiving contracts or other funding from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. While the legal impact of being included in the list is relatively limited, such inclusion may have a material adverse effect on our reputation and our business opportunities. No entities of the Company are currently on the list. If we were included on a more restrictive sanctions list imposed by the U.S. government in the future, our ability to conduct business with U.S. companies could be further affected, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery legislation in other jurisdictions could result in fines, criminal penalties, contract terminations and an adverse effect on our business.
We may operate in a number of countries through the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws and have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is consistent and in compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”). We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
We are a Marshall Islands corporation, and the Marshall Islands does not have a well-developed body of corporate law or a bankruptcy act, and as a result, stockholders may have fewer rights and protections under Marshall Islands law than under the laws of a jurisdiction in the United States.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act (the “BCA”). The provisions of the BCA are similar to provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States, most notably Delaware. The BCA also provides that it is to be applied and construed to make it uniform with the laws of Delaware and other states of the United States that have substantially similar legislative provisions or statutory laws. In addition, so long as it does not conflict with the BCA or decisions of the Marshall Islands courts, the BCA is to be interpreted according to the non-statutory law (or case law) of the State of Delaware and other states of the United States that have substantially similar legislative provisions or statutory laws. There have been, however, few court cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA, in contrast to Delaware, which has a well-developed body of case law interpreting its corporate law statutes. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as the courts in Delaware or such other states of the United States. For example, the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the laws of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in the relevant U.S. jurisdictions. Stockholder rights may differ as well. As a result, our public stockholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling stockholders than would stockholders of a corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction.
The Marshall Islands has no established bankruptcy act, and as a result, any bankruptcy action involving our company would have to be initiated outside the Marshall Islands, and our public stockholders may find it difficult or impossible to pursue their claims in such other jurisdictions.
It may be difficult or impossible to enforce service of process and enforcement of judgments against us and our officers and directors.
We are a Marshall Islands corporation and all of our subsidiaries are, and will likely be, incorporated in jurisdictions outside the United States. In addition, our executive offices are located outside of the United States in Monaco. All of our directors and officers reside outside of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of most of our officers and directors are, and will likely be, located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for U.S. investors to serve legal process within the United States upon us or any of these persons or to enforce a judgment against us for civil liabilities in U.S. courts. In addition, you should not assume that courts in the countries in which we or our subsidiaries are incorporated or where our or our subsidiaries’ assets are located (1) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or our subsidiaries based upon the civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws or (2) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us or our subsidiaries based on those laws.
There is also substantial doubt that the courts of the Marshall Islands or Monaco would enter judgments in original actions brought in those courts predicated on U.S. federal or state securities laws.
Risks Relating to our Securities
The price of our securities may be volatile and future sales of our equity securities could cause the market price of our securities to decline.
The price of our equity securities has been and may continue to be volatile and may fluctuate due to various factors including:
| • | actual or anticipated fluctuations in quarterly and annual results; |
| • | fluctuations in the seaborne transportation industry, including fluctuations in the containership and dry bulk markets; |
| • | our payment of dividends; |
| • | mergers and strategic alliances in the shipping industry; |
| • | changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards; |
| • | shortfalls in our operating results from levels forecasted by securities analysts; |
| • | announcements concerning us or our competitors; |
| • | general economic conditions; |
| • | future sales of our stock or other securities; |
| • | investors’ perceptions of us and the international shipping industry; |
| • | the general state of the securities markets; and |
| • | other developments affecting us, our industry or our competitors. |
The shipping industry and associated derivatives markets are highly unpredictable and volatile. Securities markets worldwide are experiencing significant price and volume fluctuations. The market price for our securities may also be volatile. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our securities in spite of our operating performance. Consequently, you may not be able to sell our securities at prices equal to or greater than those at which you pay or paid.
Furthermore, sales of a substantial number of shares of our equity securities in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, may depress the market price for our securities. These sales could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities in the future.
On July 6, 2016, we implemented a dividend reinvestment plan (the “Dividend Reinvestment Plan”) that offers holders of our common stock the opportunity to purchase additional shares by having their cash dividends automatically reinvested in our common stock. Subject to the rules of the NYSE, in the future, we may issue, in addition to the shares to be issued under our Dividend Reinvestment Plan and the shares to be issued under the Services Agreement, additional shares of common stock, and other equity securities of equal or senior rank, without stockholder approval, in a number of circumstances.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we have issued 981,410 new shares under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2024, we have issued 598,400 common shares to Costamare Services in payment of services rendered under the Services Agreement.
The issuance by us of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities of equal or senior rank would have the following effects:
| • | our existing stockholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease; |
| • | the dividend amount payable per share on our securities may be lower; |
| • | the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding share may be diminished; and |
| • | the market price of our securities may decline. |
Our major stockholders also may elect to sell large numbers of shares held by them from time to time. The number of shares of common stock and Preferred Stock available for sale in the public market will be limited by restrictions applicable under securities laws, and agreements that we and our executive officers, directors and existing stockholders may enter into with the underwriters at the time of an offering. Subject to certain exceptions, these agreements generally restrict us and our executive officers, directors and existing stockholders from directly or indirectly offering, selling, pledging, hedging or otherwise disposing of our equity securities or any security that is convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our equity securities and from engaging in certain other transactions relating to such securities for an agreed period after the date of an offering prospectus without the prior written consent of the underwriters.
Our ability to pay dividends or to redeem our Preferred Stock may be limited by the amount of cash we generate from operations following the payment of fees and expenses, by the establishment of any reserves, by restrictions in our debt instruments and by additional factors unrelated to our profitability.
The declaration and payment of dividends (including cumulative dividends payable to the holders of our Preferred Stock) is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and the requirements of Marshall Islands law. The timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things (a) our earnings, financial condition, cash flow and cash requirements, (b) our liquidity, including our ability to obtain debt and/or equity financing on acceptable terms as contemplated by our vessel acquisition strategy, (c) restrictive covenants in our existing and future debt instruments and (d) provisions of Marshall Islands law governing the payment of dividends.
The international shipping industry and associated derivatives markets are highly volatile, and we cannot predict with certainty the amount of cash, if any, that will be available for distribution as dividends or to redeem our Preferred Stock in any period. Also, there may be a high degree of variability from period to period in the amount of cash, if any, that is available for the payment of dividends or the redemption of our Preferred Stock and our obligation to pay dividends to holders of our Preferred Stock will reduce the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends to holders of our common stock. The amount of cash we generate from and use in our operations and the actual amount of cash we will have available for dividends and redemptions may fluctuate significantly based upon, among other things:
| • | the charter hire payments we obtain from our charters as well as our ability to charter or re-charter our vessels and the charter rates obtained; |
| • | the due performance by our charterers and other counterparties of their obligations; |
| • | our fleet expansion strategy and associated uses of our cash and our financing requirements; |
| • | delays in the delivery of newbuild vessels and the beginning of payments under charters relating to those vessels; |
| • | the level of our operating costs, such as the costs of crews, vessel maintenance, lubricants and insurance; |
| • | the number of unscheduled off-hire days for our fleet and the timing of, and number of days required for, scheduled dry-docking of our vessels; |
| • | disruptions related to an epidemic or pandemic; |
| • | prevailing global and regional economic and political conditions, including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the conflict between Israel and Hamas and related conflicts in the Middle East and the Red Sea crisis; |
| • | changes in interest rates; |
| • | currency exchange rate fluctuations; |
| • | dry bulk freight rates and bunker prices; |
| • | the effect of governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards on the conduct of our business; |
| • | the requirements imposed by classification societies; |
| • | the level of capital expenditures we make, including for maintaining or replacing vessels and complying with regulations; |
| • | the level of capital requirements of our dry bulk operating platform and our leasing business; |
| • | our debt service requirements, including fluctuations in interest rates, and restrictions on distributions contained in our debt instruments; |
| • | fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
| • | our ability to make, and the level of, working capital borrowings; |
| • | changes in the basis of taxation of our activities in various jurisdictions; |
| • | modification or revocation of our dividend policy by our board of directors; |
| • | the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and make distributions to us; and |
| • | the amount of any cash reserves established by our board of directors. |
The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ materially from our net income or loss for the period, which will be affected by non-cash items. We may incur other expenses or liabilities that could reduce or eliminate the cash available for distribution as dividends or redemptions.
In addition, our credit facilities prohibit the payment of dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividends. For more information regarding our financing arrangements, please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.
Our management is required to devote substantial time to complying with public company regulations.
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) as well as rules subsequently adopted by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”), have imposed various requirements on public companies, including in respect of corporate governance practices. Our directors, management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time to comply with these requirements and compliance with these rules and regulations relating to public companies results in legal and financial compliance costs.
Sarbanes-Oxley requires, among other things, that we maintain and periodically evaluate our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, we are required to include in each of our annual reports on Form 20-F a report containing our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and a related attestation of our independent auditors. We have undertaken the required review to comply with Section 404, including the documentation, testing and review of our internal controls under the direction of our management. While we did not identify any material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls under the current assessment, we cannot be certain at this time that all our controls will be considered effective in future assessments. Therefore, we can give no assurances that our internal control over financial reporting will satisfy regulatory requirements in the future.
Investors may view our having multiple lines of business, including ownership of multiple fleets, negatively, which may decrease the trading price of our securities.
We operate a dry bulk operating platform, we have recently entered into a leasing business and we own and operate both containerships and dry bulk fleets. Historically, companies that have multiple lines of business or own mixed asset classes have tended to trade at levels that suggest lower valuations than “pure play” companies. Accordingly, investors may view our stock as relatively less attractive than stocks of pure play companies, which could materially and adversely affect the trading price of our securities.
We are a “foreign private issuer” under the NYSE rules, and as such we are entitled to exemption from certain NYSE corporate governance standards, and you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.
We are a “foreign private issuer” under the securities laws of the United States and the rules of the NYSE. Under the securities laws of the United States, “foreign private issuers” are subject to different disclosure requirements than U.S. domiciled registrants, as well as different financial reporting requirements. Under the NYSE rules, a “foreign private issuer” is subject to less stringent corporate governance requirements. Subject to certain exceptions, the rules of the NYSE permit a “foreign private issuer” to follow its home country practice in lieu of the listing requirements of the NYSE.
As permitted by this exemption, as well as by our bylaws and the laws of the Marshall Islands, we currently have a board of directors with a majority of non-independent directors, an audit committee comprised solely of two independent directors and a combined corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee with one non-independent director serving as a committee chairman. As a result, non-independent directors, including members of our management who also serve on our board of directors, may, among other things, fix the compensation of our management, make stock and option awards and resolve governance issues regarding our company. Accordingly, in the future you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.
Our Preferred Stock is subordinated to our debt obligations and pari passu with each other, and your interests could be diluted by the issuance of additional shares of preferred stock, including additional Series B, Series C and Series D Preferred Stock, and by other transactions.
Our Preferred Stock is subordinated to all of our existing and future indebtedness. As of December 31, 2024, we had outstanding indebtedness, including our other financing arrangements and finance leases, of approximately $2.1 billion. Our existing indebtedness restricts, and our future indebtedness may include restrictions on, our ability to pay dividends to preferred stockholders. Our charter currently authorizes the issuance of up to 100 million shares of preferred stock in one or more classes or series. Of this preferred stock, 80.0 million shares remain available for issuance after giving effect to the designation of 10 million shares as Series A Participating Preferred Stock in connection with our adoption of a stockholder rights plan, the issuance of two million shares as Series B Preferred Stock, the issuance of four million shares as Series C Preferred Stock and the issuance of four million shares as Series D Preferred Stock. The issuance of additional preferred stock on a parity with or senior to our Preferred Stock would dilute the interests of the holders of our Preferred Stock, and any issuance of preferred stock senior to or on a parity with our Preferred Stock or of additional indebtedness could affect our ability to pay dividends on, redeem or pay the liquidation preference on our Preferred Stock. No provisions relating to our Preferred Stock protect the holders of our Preferred Stock in the event of a highly leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale, lease or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets or business, which might adversely affect the holders of our Preferred Stock.
Holders of Preferred Stock have extremely limited voting rights.
Our common stock is the only class of our stock carrying full voting rights. Holders of the Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights except (1) in respect of amendments to the Articles of Incorporation which would adversely alter the preferences, powers or rights of the Preferred Stock or (2) in the event that the Company proposes to issue any parity stock if the cumulative dividends payable on outstanding Preferred Stock are in arrears or any senior stock. However, if and whenever dividends payable on the Preferred Stock are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, holders of Preferred Stock (for this purpose the Series B, Series C and Series D Preferred Stock will vote together as a single class with all other classes or series of parity stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will be entitled to elect one additional director to serve on our board of directors, and the size of our board of directors will be increased as needed to accommodate such change (unless the size of our board of directors already has been increased by reason of the election of a director by holders of parity stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and with which the Preferred Stock voted as a class for the election of such director). The right of such holders of Preferred Stock to elect a member of our board of directors will continue until such time as all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Preferred Stock have been paid in full.
The Preferred Stock represents perpetual equity interests and you will have no right to receive any greater payment than the liquidation preference regardless of the circumstances.
The Preferred Stock represents perpetual equity interests in us and, unlike our indebtedness, will not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date. As a result, holders of the Preferred Stock may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment in the Preferred Stock for an indefinite period of time.
The payment due to a holder of Preferred Stock upon a liquidation is fixed at the redemption preference of $25.00 per share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date of liquidation. If, in the case of our liquidation, there are remaining assets to be distributed after payment of this amount, you will have no right to receive or to participate in these amounts. Furthermore, if the market price for your Preferred Stock is greater than the liquidation preference, you will have no right to receive the market price from us upon our liquidation.
Members of the Konstantakopoulos family are our principal existing stockholders and will effectively be able to control the outcome of matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote; their interests may be different from yours.
Members of the Konstantakopoulos family own, as of February 12, 2025, approximately 63.5% of our outstanding common stock, in the aggregate. These stockholders will be able to control the outcome of matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote, including the election of our entire board of directors and other significant corporate actions. The interests of each of these stockholders may be different from yours. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Our chairman and chief executive officer has affiliations with our managers and others that could create conflicts of interest between us and our managers or other entities in which he has an interest.”
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents could make it difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove our current board of directors or could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, which could adversely affect the market price of the shares of our common stock.
Several provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for our stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors in any one year, preventing them from changing the composition of our management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that stockholders may consider favorable.
These provisions:
| • | authorize our board of directors to issue “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval; |
| • | provide for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms; |
| • | prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors; |
| • | authorize the removal of directors only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote for those directors; |
| • | prohibit stockholder action by written consent unless the written consent is signed by all stockholders entitled to vote on the action; and |
| • | establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings. |
We have adopted a stockholder rights plan pursuant to which our board of directors may cause the substantial dilution of the holdings of any person that attempts to acquire us without the approval of our board of directors.
These anti-takeover provisions, including the provisions of our stockholder rights plan, could substantially impede the ability of public stockholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
Tax Risks
In addition to the following risk factors, you should read “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—Marshall Islands Tax Considerations”, “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—Liberian Tax Considerations” and “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations” for a more complete discussion of the material Marshall Islands, Liberian and U.S. Federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of our common stock and Preferred Stock.
We may have to pay tax on U.S.-source income, which would reduce our earnings.
Under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the U.S. source gross transportation income of a ship-owning or chartering corporation, such as ourselves, is subject to a 4% U.S. Federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that corporation qualifies for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. U.S. source gross transportation income consists of 50% of the gross shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States.
We believe that we have qualified and currently intend to continue to qualify for this statutory tax exemption for the foreseeable future. However, no assurance can be given that this will be the case. If we or our subsidiaries are not entitled to this exemption under Section 883 for any taxable year, we or our subsidiaries would be subject for those years to a 4% U.S. Federal income tax on our U.S. source gross transportation income. The imposition of this taxation could have a negative effect on our business and would result in decreased earnings available for distribution to our stockholders. Some of our time charters contain provisions pursuant to which charterers undertake to reimburse us for the 4% gross basis tax on our U.S. source gross transportation income. For a more detailed discussion, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Our Shipping Income”.
If we were treated as a “passive foreign investment company”, certain adverse U.S. Federal income tax consequences could result to U.S. stockholders.
A foreign corporation will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”), for U.S. Federal income tax purposes if at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income”, or at least 50% of the average value of the corporation’s assets produce or are held for the production of those types of “passive income”. For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, and gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties that are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income”. U.S. stockholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. Federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC, and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC. If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, we will provide information to U.S. stockholders who request such information to enable them to make certain elections to alleviate certain of the adverse U.S. Federal income tax consequences that would arise as a result of holding an interest in a PFIC.
Based on our method of operation, we believe that we are not now and have never been a PFIC. Although there can be no assurance, we also do not expect to be classified as a PFIC for 2025 or subsequent years. This expectation is based on our current operations and current law. In this regard, we intend to treat the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time chartering activities as services income, rather than rental income. Accordingly, we believe that our income from our time chartering activities does not constitute “passive income”, and the assets that we own and operate in connection with the production of that income do not constitute passive assets. Our counsel, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, is of the opinion that we should not be a PFIC based on certain assumptions made by them as well as certain representations we made to them regarding the composition of our assets, the source of our income, and the nature of our operations.
There is, however, no legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our method of operation. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or a court of law will accept our position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a PFIC. Moreover, no assurance can be given that we would not constitute a PFIC for any future taxable year if there were to be changes in the nature and extent of our operations.
Further, our PFIC determination must be tested annually at the end of the taxable year and, while we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner that will reduce the likelihood of our becoming a PFIC, our circumstances may change in any given year. We do not intend to make decisions regarding the purchase and sale of vessels, investment in financial instruments or engaging in a sale-leaseback business with the specific purpose of impacting the likelihood of our becoming a PFIC. Accordingly, our business plan may result in our engaging in activities that could cause us to become a PFIC.
If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, U.S. stockholders would face adverse tax consequences. Under the PFIC rules, unless those stockholders make certain elections available under the Code, such stockholders would be liable to pay U.S. Federal income tax at the then prevailing income tax rates on ordinary income plus interest upon excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock, as if the excess distribution or gain had been recognized ratably over the stockholder’s holding period. Please read “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of United States Holders—PFIC Status” for a more detailed discussion of the U.S. Federal income tax consequences to U.S. stockholders if we are treated as a PFIC.
Our diverse lines of business may have an impact on our tax treatment in the countries in which we operate, which could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations.
We are an international company that conducts business throughout the world. Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, a change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, in the interpretation thereof or in the applicability thereof in and between countries in which we operate, could result in a materially high tax expense or higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and such change could be significant to our financial results.
New tax laws and regulations are currently being adopted by many jurisdictions pursuant to the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) Project to set up an international framework to combat tax avoidance. In January 2019, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (the “OECD”) announced the Pillar One and Pillar Two frameworks. Pillar One reallocates certain residual profits of multinational enterprises to market jurisdictions where goods or services are used or consumed. Pillar Two also referred to as the Global Anti-Based Erosion Rules (the “GloBE Rules”) operate to impose a minimum tax rate of 15% calculated on a jurisdictional basis. More than 130 countries have signed on to the GloBE Rules released in December 2021 that, among other provisions, give the countries the right to “tax back” profit that is currently taxed below the minimum 15% rate. The framework calls for law enactment by OECD and G20 members in 2022 to take effect in 2023 and 2024. Presently, it is difficult to assess if and to what extent such changes will impact our tax burden. Further developments and unexpected implementation mechanics could adversely affect our effective tax rate or result in higher cash tax liabilities.
If any tax authority successfully challenges our operational structure, intercompany pricing policies or the taxable presence of our key subsidiaries in certain countries, or if the terms of certain income tax laws or treaties are interpreted in a manner that is adverse to our structure or new lines of business, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings from our operations could increase substantially and our earnings and cash flows from these operations could be materially adversely affected.
We and our subsidiaries may be subject to taxation in the jurisdictions in which we and our subsidiaries conduct business. Such taxation would result in decreased earnings. Investors are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences of the ownership of our common shares arising in an investor’s particular situation under U.S. Federal, state, local and foreign law.
ITEM 4. | INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY |
A. | History and Development of the Company |
Costamare Inc. was incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands on April 21, 2008 under the BCA. We are majority owned by members of the Konstantakopoulos family, which has a long history of operating and investing in the international shipping industry, including a long history of vessel ownership. We were founded in 1974 and initially owned and operated dry bulk vessels. In 1984, we became the first Greek-owned company to enter the containership market, and from 1992 until our acquisition of dry bulk vessels in June 2021 and the subsequent expansion of our dry bulk platform in 2022, we focused exclusively on containerships. Since assuming management of our company in 1998, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos has concentrated on building a large, modern and reliable fleet run and supported by highly skilled, experienced and loyal personnel. Under the leadership of Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, we have continued to foster a company culture focusing on excellent customer service, industry leadership and innovation.
In November 2010, we completed an initial public offering of our common stock in the United States and our common stock began trading on the NYSE on November 4, 2010 under the ticker symbol “CMRE”. On March 27, 2012, October 19, 2012, December 5, 2016 and May 31, 2017, we completed four follow-on public offerings of our common stock. On August 7, 2013, we completed a public offering of our Series B Preferred Stock, on January 21, 2014, we completed a public offering of our Series C Preferred Stock, on May 13, 2015, we completed a public offering of our Series D Preferred Stock and on January 30, 2018, we completed a public offering of our Series E Preferred Stock. On July 6, 2016, we implemented a Dividend Reinvestment Plan that offers holders of our common stock the opportunity to purchase additional shares by having their cash dividends automatically reinvested in our common stock at a discount to current market price.
Under the Framework Deed entered into in May 2013, as amended and restated in May 2015 and as further amended in June 2018, we agreed with York to invest in newbuild and secondhand container vessels through jointly held companies, thereby increasing our ability to expand our operations while diversifying our risk. After acquiring a number of both newbuild and secondhand container vessels, the commitment period ended on May 15, 2020. The Framework Deed was terminated on December 31, 2024 upon the winding up of the last remaining Joint Venture entity.
In June 2021, we decided to expand into the dry bulk shipping sector and invest in dry bulk vessels.
In November 2022, we established a dry bulk operating platform under Costamare Bulkers. The venture has offices in Athens and Monaco as well as agreements with agencies in Copenhagen, Hamburg, Singapore and Japan for the provision of chartering, cargo sourcing and/or research services on a cost-plus basis. The operating platform, which commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2022, charters-in/out dry bulk vessels, enters into contracts of affreightment, forward freight agreements and may also utilize hedging solutions. We own 97.5% of the shares of the dry bulk operating platform. We have invested $203.4 million in Costamare Bulkers and have extended unsecured loans to Costamare Bulkers in the amount of $85 million. As of February 12, 2025, Costamare Bulkers has chartered-in for a period, 50 dry bulk vessels. Additionally, the dry bulk operating platform has contracted to charter-in two vessels, which are currently under construction, once they are delivered to their third-party owners.
In March 2023, we entered into an amended and restated subscription and shareholders’ agreement with the existing Neptune shareholders at the time (the “Neptune Shareholders’ Agreement”) pursuant to which we agreed to invest in the Neptune leasing business and acquired the controlling interest of Neptune. Neptune was originally established in 2021 to acquire, own and bareboat charter out vessels through wholly-owned subsidiaries. Neptune’s strategy is to build a portfolio of long-term contracts through sale and leaseback transactions in the maritime sector. Pursuant to the Neptune Shareholders’ Agreement, we received a special share in Neptune which carries 75% of the voting rights and have agreed to invest up to $200 million in exchange for up to 40% of the ordinary shares and up to 79.05% of the preferred shares. As of February 12, 2025, we have invested in Neptune the amount of $123.3 million and own 36.6% of Neptune’s ordinary shares and 73.2% of its preferred shares. As of February 12, 2025, Neptune is currently funding or committed to funding 37 shipping assets, and Neptune’s portfolio of sale and leaseback arrangements and commitments includes 19 dry bulk vessels, three tanker vessels and 15 offshore vessels.
On July 15, 2024, the Company completed the full redemption of all of its 4,574,100 outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock. The Company funded the redemption with cash on hand.
For more information on the Company’s capital expenditures and divestitures, see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
We maintain our principal executive offices at 7 rue du Gabian, MC 98000 Monaco. Our telephone number at that address is +377 93 25 09 40. Our registered address in the Marshall Islands is Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960. The name of our registered agent at such address is The Trust Company of the Marshall Islands, Inc.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information as a foreign private issuer with the SEC. You may inspect reports and other information regarding registrants, such as us, that file electronically with the SEC without charge at a website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. These documents and other important information on our governance are posted on our website and may be viewed at http//www.costamare.com. The information contained on or connected to our website is not part of this annual report.
General
We are an international owner and operator of containerships and dry bulk vessels. We charter our containerships to the world’s largest liner companies, providing worldwide transportation of containerized cargoes. We charter our dry bulk vessels to a wide variety of customers, providing worldwide transportation for dry bulk cargoes.
As of February 12, 2025, our containership fleet consisted of 68 vessels in the water, aggregating approximately 513,000 TEU.
Our strategy is to time charter our containerships to a geographically diverse, financially strong and loyal group of leading liner companies. We aim to operate our containerships under long-term, fixed-rate time charters, to the extent available, to avoid seasonal variations in demand. Our containerships have low unscheduled off-hire days, with fleet utilization levels, excluding scheduled dry-dockings, of 99.3%, 99.0% and 99.8% in 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively. Over the last three years, our largest customers by revenue were A.P. Moller-Maersk, MSC, Evergreen, Hapag Lloyd, ZIM and COSCO. The average (weighted by TEU capacity) remaining time charter duration for our fleet of 68 containerships in the water was approximately 3.4 years, based on the remaining fixed terms and assuming the exercise of any owner’s options and the non-exercise of any charterer’s options under our containerships’ charters. Our fixed-term charters for our fleet of 68 vessels in the water represented an aggregate of approximately $2.4 billion of contracted revenue, assuming the earliest redelivery dates possible and 365 revenue days per annum per containership.
As of February 12, 2025, our dry bulk fleet consisted of 38 vessels in the water, with a total carrying capacity of approximately 3,017,000 dwt, including one vessel that we have agreed to sell, with a carrying capacity of approximately 76,600 dwt. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”. Our current chartering policy for our dry bulk fleet is to employ our vessels primarily on short-term time charters, which provides us the flexibility to capitalize on any favorable changes in the dry bulk charter rate environment. This policy will be evaluated regularly in light of prevailing market conditions and our view of the market. We will continue to monitor developments in the dry bulk shipping market and, based on market conditions, we may employ our vessels with a mix of short-, medium- and long-term time charters and voyage charters. We believe this policy allows us to obtain attractive charter hire rates for our vessels, while also affording us flexibility to take advantage of a rising charter rate environment without limiting potential upside should the strong market conditions continue. For the year ending December 31, 2024 our dry bulk fleet utilization level was 98.9%.
As described below, our vessels are managed by Costamare Shipping which is controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer. Costamare Shipping may subcontract certain services to other affiliated managers, or to V.Ships Greece or, subject to our consent, to other third-party managers. We believe that having several management companies, both affiliates and third-party, provides us with a deep pool of operational management in multiple locations with market-specific experience and relationships, as well as the geographic flexibility needed to manage and crew our large and diverse fleet so as to provide a high level of service, while remaining cost-effective.
Since the fourth quarter of 2022, we operate a dry bulk operating platform under Costamare Bulkers which charters-in/out dry bulk vessels, enters into contracts of affreightment, forward freight agreements and utilizes hedging solutions. As of February 12, 2025, the dry bulk operating platform has chartered-in for a period, 50 vessels with a total carrying capacity of approximately 7,997,000 dwt, all of which have already been delivered and subsequently are or will be employed under voyage charters or sub time charters. Additionally, the dry bulk operating platform has contracted to charter-in two vessels, which are currently under construction, once they are delivered to their third-party owners.
As described below, the dry bulk operating platform receives chartering, cargo sourcing and/or research services from agencies in Copenhagen, Hamburg, Singapore and Japan, which are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos and our chief financial officer, Gregory Zikos.
In March 2023, we agreed to invest in the Neptune leasing business and acquired the controlling interest of Neptune. Neptune was originally established in 2021 to acquire, own and finance (via bareboat charter agreements) vessels through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. As described below, Neptune’s strategy is to build a portfolio of long-term financing contracts through sale and leaseback transactions in the maritime sector while also utilizing bank financing.
Our Fleet
Our Containership Fleet
The tables below provide additional information about our fleet of containerships as of February 12, 2025. Some of our vessels are subject to sale and leaseback transactions as indicated here below. Each vessel is a cellular containership, meaning it is a dedicated container vessel.
Current Containership Fleet
| Vessel Name | Charterer | Year Built | Capacity (TEU) | Current Daily Charter Rate(1) (U.S. dollars) | Expiration of Charter(2) |
1 | TRITON | Evergreen | 2016 | 14,424 | (*) | March 2026 |
2 | TITAN(i) | Evergreen | 2016 | 14,424 | (*) | April 2026 |
3 | TALOS(i) | Evergreen | 2016 | 14,424 | (*) | July 2026 |
4 | TAURUS(i) | Evergreen | 2016 | 14,424 | (*) | August 2026 |
5 | THESEUS(i) | Evergreen | 2016 | 14,424 | (*) | August 2026 |
6 | YM TRIUMPH(i) | Yang Ming | 2020 | 12,690 | (*) | May 2030 |
7 | YM TRUTH(i) | Yang Ming | 2020 | 12,690 | (*) | May 2030 |
8 | YM TOTALITY(i) | Yang Ming | 2020 | 12,690 | (*) | July 2030 |
9 | YM TARGET(i) | Yang Ming | 2021 | 12,690 | (*) | November 2030 |
10 | YM TIPTOP(i) | Yang Ming | 2021 | 12,690 | (*) | March 2031 |
11 | CAPE AKRITAS | MSC | 2016 | 11,010 | 33,000 | August 2031 |
12 | CAPE TAINARO | MSC | 2017 | 11,010 | 33,000 | April 2031 |
13 | CAPE KORTIA | MSC | 2017 | 11,010 | 33,000 | August 2031 |
14 | CAPE SOUNIO | MSC | 2017 | 11,010 | 33,000 | April 2031 |
15 | CAPE ARTEMISIO | Hapag Lloyd/(*) | 2017 | 11,010 | 36,650/(*) | March 2030(3) |
16 | ZIM SHANGHAI | ZIM/(*) | 2006 | 9,469 | 72,700/(*) | May 2028(4) |
17 | YANTIAN I (ex. ZIM YANTIAN) | ZIM/(*) | 2006 | 9,469 | 72,700/(*) | April 2028(5) |
18 | YANTIAN | COSCO/(*) | 2006 | 9,469 | (*)/(*) | May 2028(6) |
19 | COSCO HELLAS | COSCO/(*) | 2006 | 9,469 | (*)/(*) | August 2028(7) |
20 | BEIJING | COSCO/(*) | 2006 | 9,469 | (*)/(*) | July 2028(8) |
21 | MSC AZOV | MSC/(*) | 2014 | 9,403 | 35,300/(*) | December 2029(9) |
22 | MSC AMALFI | MSC | 2014 | 9,403 | 35,300 | March 2027 |
23 | MSC AJACCIO | MSC | 2014 | 9,403 | 35,300 | February 2027 |
24 | MSC ATHENS | MSC/(*) | 2013 | 8,827 | 35,300/(*) | January 2029(10) |
25 | MSC ATHOS | MSC/(*) | 2013 | 8,827 | 35,300/(*) | February 2029(11) |
| Vessel Name | Charterer | Year Built | Capacity (TEU) | Current Daily Charter Rate(1) (U.S. dollars) | Expiration of Charter(2) |
26 | VALOR | Hapag Lloyd/(*) | 2013 | 8,827 | 32,400/(*) | April 2030(12) |
27 | VALUE | Hapag Lloyd/(*) | 2013 | 8,827 | 32,400/(*) | April 2030(13) |
28 | VALIANT | Hapag Lloyd/(*) | 2013 | 8,827 | 32,400/(*) | June 2030(14) |
29 | VALENCE | Hapag Lloyd/(*) | 2013 | 8,827 | 32,400/(*) | July 2030(15) |
30 | VANTAGE | Hapag Lloyd/(*) | 2013 | 8,827 | 32,400/(*) | September 2030(16) |
31 | NAVARINO | MSC/(*) | 2010 | 8,531 | 31,000/(*) | March 2029(17) |
32 | KLEVEN | MSC/(*) | 1996 | 8,044 | 41,500/(*) | April 2028(18) |
33 | KOTKA | MSC/(*) | 1996 | 8,044 | 41,500/(*) | September 2028(19) |
34 | MAERSK KOWLOON | Maersk | 2005 | 7,471 | 18,500 | October 2025 |
35 | KURE | MSC/(*) | 1996 | 7,403 | 41,500/(*) | August 2028(20) |
36 | METHONI | Maersk | 2003 | 6,724 | 47,453 | August 2026 |
37 | PORTO CHELI | Maersk | 2001 | 6,712 | 30,075 | June 2026 |
38 | TAMPA I | ZIM/(*) | 2000 | 6,648 | 45,000/(*) | July 2025 / June 2028(21) |
39 | ZIM VIETNAM | ZIM | 2003 | 6,644 | 38,500 | December 2028(22) |
40 | ZIM AMERICA | ZIM | 2003 | 6,644 | 38,500 | December 2028 (23) |
41 | ARIES | (*) | 2004 | 6,492 | 58,500 | March 2026 |
42 | ARGUS | (*) | 2004 | 6,492 | 58,500 | April 2026 |
43 | PORTO KAGIO | Maersk | 2002 | 5,908 | 28,822 | June 2026 |
44 | GLEN CANYON | ZIM/(*) | 2006 | 5,642 | 62,500/(*) | June 2025/ April 2028(24) |
45 | PORTO GERMENO | Maersk | 2002 | 5,570 | 28,822 | June 2026 |
46 | LEONIDIO | Maersk | 2014 | 4,957 | 18,018 | October 2026 |
47 | KYPARISSIA | Maersk | 2014 | 4,957 | 18,118 | October 2026 |
48 | MEGALOPOLIS | Maersk | 2013 | 4,957 | 14,043 | July 2025(25) |
49 | MARATHOPOLIS | Maersk | 2013 | 4,957 | 14,044 | July 2025(25) |
50 | GIALOVA | (*) | 2009 | 4,578 | (*) | March 2026 |
51 | DYROS | Maersk | 2008 | 4,578 | 35,500 | April 2027(26) |
52 | NORFOLK | (*)/(*) | 2009 | 4,259 | (*)/(*) | March 2028(27) |
53 | VULPECULA | ZIM | 2010 | 4,258 | Please refer to note 28 | May 2028(28) |
54 | VOLANS | (*) | 2010 | 4,258 | (*) | July 2027 |
55 | VIRGO | Maersk | 2009 | 4,258 | 35,500 | April 2027(29) |
56 | VELA | ZIM | 2009 | 4,258 | Please refer to note 30 | April 2028(30) |
| Vessel Name | Charterer | Year Built | Capacity (TEU) | Current Daily Charter Rate(1) (U.S. dollars) | Expiration of Charter(2) |
57 | ANDROUSA | (*) | 2010 | 4,256 | (*) | March 2026 |
58 | NEOKASTRO | CMA CGM | 2011 | 4,178 | 39,000 | February 2027 |
59 | ULSAN | Maersk | 2002 | 4,132 | 34,730 | January 2026 |
60 | POLAR BRASIL (i) | Maersk | 2018 | 3,800 | 21,000 | March 2026(31) |
61 | LAKONIA | COSCO | 2004 | 2,586 | 23,500 | February 2027(32) |
62 | SCORPIUS | Hapag Lloyd | 2007 | 2,572 | 16,500 | February 2026 |
63 | ETOILE | (*)/(*) | 2005 | 2,556 | (*)/(*) | July 2028(33) |
64 | AREOPOLIS | COSCO | 2000 | 2,474 | 23,500 | March 2027(34) |
65 | ARKADIA | Swire Shipping | 2001 | 1,550 | 13,000 | March 2025 |
66 | MICHIGAN | (*)/(*) | 2008 | 1,300 | (*)/(*) | October 2027(35) |
67 | TRADER | (*)/(*) | 2008 | 1,300 | (*)/(*) | October 2028(36) |
68 | LUEBECK | (*)/(*) | 2001 | 1,078 | (*)/(*) | April 2028 (37) |
(1) | Daily charter rates are gross, unless stated otherwise. Amounts set out for current daily charter rate are the amounts contained in the charter contracts. |
(2) | Charter terms and expiration dates are based on the earliest date charters (unless otherwise noted) could expire. |
(3) | Cape Artemisio is currently chartered to Hapag Lloyd at a daily rate of $36,650 until March 12, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from Hapag Lloyd, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 60 to 64 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(4) | Zim Shanghai is currently chartered to ZIM at a daily rate of $72,700 until July 1, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from ZIM, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 34 to 36 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(5) | Yantian I (ex. Zim Yantian) is currently chartered to ZIM at a daily rate of $72,700 until June 27, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from ZIM, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 34 to 36 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(6) | Yantian is currently chartered to COSCO at an undisclosed rate until May 1, 2026, at the earliest. Following the aforementioned date, the vessel will be employed with a leading liner company for a period of 24 to 26 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(7) | Cosco Hellas is currently chartered to COSCO at an undisclosed rate until August 1, 2026, at the earliest. Following the aforementioned date, the vessel will be employed with a leading liner company for a period of 24 to 26 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(8) | Beijing is currently chartered to COSCO at an undisclosed rate until July 1, 2026, at the earliest. Following the aforementioned date, the vessel will be employed with a leading liner company for a period of 24 to 26 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(9) | MSC Azov is currently chartered to MSC at a daily rate of $35,300 until December 2026 (earliest redelivery) - January 2027 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until December 2029 (earliest redelivery) - February 2030 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(10) | MSC Athens is currently chartered to MSC at a daily rate of $35,300 until January 2026 (earliest redelivery) - March 2026 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until January 2029 (earliest redelivery) - March 2029 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(11) | MSC Athos is currently chartered to MSC at a daily rate of $35,300 until February 2026 (earliest redelivery) - April 2026 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until February 2029 (earliest redelivery) - April 2029 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(12) | Valor is currently chartered to Hapag Lloyd at a daily rate of $32,400 until April 3, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from Hapag Lloyd, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 60 to 64 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(13) | Value is currently chartered to Hapag Lloyd at a daily rate of $32,400 until April 25, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from Hapag Lloyd, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 60 to 64 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(14) | Valiant is currently chartered to Hapag Lloyd at a daily rate of $32,400 until June 5, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from Hapag Lloyd, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 60 to 64 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(15) | Valence is currently chartered to Hapag Lloyd at a daily rate of $32,400 until July 3, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from Hapag Lloyd, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 60 to 64 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(16) | Vantage is currently chartered to Hapag Lloyd at a daily rate of $32,400 until September 8, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from Hapag Lloyd, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 60 to 64 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(17) | Navarino is currently chartered to MSC at a daily rate of $31,000 until March 1, 2025, at the earliest. Upon redelivery of the vessel from MSC, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 48 to 52 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(18) | Kleven is currently chartered to MSC at a daily rate of $41,500 until November 2026 (earliest redelivery) - January 2027 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until April 2028 (earliest redelivery) - June 2028 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(19) | Kotka is currently chartered to MSC at a daily rate of $41,500 until December 2026 (earliest redelivery) - February 2027 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until September 2028 (earliest redelivery) - November 2028 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(20) | Kure is currently chartered to MSC at a daily rate of $41,500 until July 2026 (earliest redelivery) - September 2026 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until August 2028 (earliest redelivery) - October 2028 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(21) | Tampa I is currently chartered to ZIM at a daily rate of $45,000 until July 2025 (earliest redelivery) - August 2025 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from ZIM, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 34 to 36 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(22) | ZIM Vietnam is currently chartered at a daily rate of $53,000 until October 17, 2025. From such date and until the expiration of the charter the new daily rate will be $38,500. |
(23) | ZIM America is currently chartered at a daily rate of $53,000 until October 3, 2025. From such date and until the expiration of the charter the new daily rate will be $38,500. |
(24) | Glen Canyon is currently chartered to ZIM at a daily rate of $62,500 until June 2025 (earliest redelivery) - September 2025 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from ZIM, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company for a period of 34 to 36 months at an undisclosed rate. |
(25) | Charterer has the option to extend the current time charter for an additional period of approximately 24 months at a daily rate of $14,500. |
(26) | Dyros is currently chartered to Maersk at a daily rate of $17,500 until April 15, 2025. Following the aforementioned date, the new daily rate will be $35,500 for a period of 24 to 26 months. |
(27) | Norfolk is currently chartered until March 2025 (earliest redelivery) - May 2025 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until March 2028 (earliest redelivery) - May 2028 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(28) | Vulpecula is currently chartered to ZIM under a charterparty agreement which commenced in May 2023. The tenor of the charter is for a period of 60 to 64 months. For this charter, the daily rate is $99,000 for the first 12 month period, $91,250 for the second 12 month period, $10,000 for the third 12 month period and $8,000 for the remaining duration of the charter. |
(29) | Virgo is currently chartered to Maersk at a daily rate of $21,500 until April 15, 2025. Following the aforementioned date, the new daily rate will be $35,500 for a period of 24 to 26 months. |
(30) | Vela is currently chartered to ZIM under a charterparty agreement which commenced in April 2023. The tenor of the charter is for a period of 60 to 64 months. For this charter, the daily rate is $99,000 for the first 12 month period, $91,250 for the second 12 month period, $10,000 for the third 12 month period and $8,000 for the remaining duration of the charter. |
(31) | Polar Brasil is currently chartered at a daily rate of $19,700 until April 27, 2025. From such date and until the expiration of the charter, the new daily rate will be $21,000. The charterer has the option to extend the current time charter for two additional one-year periods at a daily rate of $21,000. |
(32) | Lakonia is currently chartered to COSCO at a daily rate of $26,500 until March 24, 2025. Following the aforementioned date, the new daily rate will be $23,500 for a period of 23 to 25 months. |
(33) | Etoile is currently chartered until June 2026 (earliest redelivery) - September 2026 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until July 2028 (earliest redelivery) - August 2028 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(34) | Areopolis is currently chartered to COSCO at a daily rate of $26,500 until April 3, 2025. Following the aforementioned date, the new daily rate will be $23,500 for a period of 23 to 25 months. |
(35) | Michigan is currently chartered until October 2025 (earliest redelivery) - December 2025 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until October 2027 (earliest redelivery) - December 2027 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(36) | Trader is currently chartered until October 2026 (earliest redelivery) - December 2026 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until October 2028 (earliest redelivery) - December 2028 at an undisclosed rate. |
(37) | Luebeck is currently chartered until April 2026 (earliest redelivery) - June 2026 (latest redelivery). Upon redelivery of the vessel from its current charterer, the vessel will commence a new charter with a leading liner company until April 2028 (earliest redelivery) - June 2028 (latest redelivery) at an undisclosed rate. |
(i) | Denotes vessels subject to a sale and leaseback transaction. |
(*) | Denotes charterer’s identity and/or current daily charter rates and/or charter expiration dates, which are treated as confidential. |
Our Dry Bulk Vessel Fleet
The table below provides additional information, as of February 12, 2025, about our fleet of 38 dry bulk vessels, including one vessel that we have agreed to sell. Each vessel is a dry bulk carrier, meaning it is a dedicated dry bulk vessel.
Current Dry Bulk Fleet
| Vessel Name | Year Built | Capacity (DWT) |
1 | FRONTIER | 2012 | 181,415 |
2 | MIRACLE | 2011 | 180,643 |
3 | PROSPER | 2012 | 179,895 |
4 | DORADO | 2011 | 179,842 |
5 | MAGNES | 2011 | 179,546 |
6 | ENNA | 2011 | 175,975 |
7 | AEOLIAN | 2012 | 83,478 |
8 | GRENETA | 2010 | 82,166 |
9 | HYDRUS | 2011 | 81,601 |
10 | PHOENIX | 2012 | 81,569 |
11 | BUILDER | 2012 | 81,541 |
12 | FARMER | 2012 | 81,541 |
13 | SAUVAN | 2010 | 79,700 |
14 | ROSE(i) | 2008 | 76,619 |
15 | MERCHIA | 2015 | 63,585 |
16 | DAWN | 2018 | 63,561 |
17 | SEABIRD | 2016 | 63,553 |
18 | ORION | 2015 | 63,473 |
19 | DAMON | 2012 | 63,301 |
20 | ARYA | 2013 | 61,424 |
21 | ALWINE | 2014 | 61,090 |
22 | AUGUST | 2015 | 61,090 |
23 | ATHENA | 2012 | 58,018 |
24 | ERACLE | 2012 | 58,018 |
25 | PYTHIAS | 2010 | 58,018 |
26 | NORMA | 2010 | 58,018 |
27 | CURACAO | 2011 | 57,937 |
28 | URUGUAY | 2011 | 57,937 |
29 | SERENA | 2010 | 57,266 |
30 | LIBRA | 2010 | 56,701 |
31 | CLARA | 2008 | 56,557 |
32 | BERMONDI | 2009 | 55,469 |
33 | VERITY | 2012 | 37,163 |
34 | PARITY | 2012 | 37,152 |
35 | ACUITY | 2011 | 37,152 |
36 | EQUITY | 2013 | 37,071 |
37 | BERNIS | 2011 | 35,995 |
38 | RESOURCE | 2010 | 31,775 |
(i) Denotes vessel we have agreed to sell.
Framework Deed
Under the Framework Deed dated May 15, 2013 (the “Original Framework Deed”), as amended and restated on May 18, 2015 and as further amended on June 12, 2018 (the “Framework Deed”), between the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Costamare Ventures Inc. (“Costamare Ventures”), on the one hand, and York Capital Management Global Advisors LLC and an affiliated fund (collectively, “York”), on the other, we agreed with York to jointly invest in newbuild and secondhand container vessels through vessel-owning joint venture entities in which we hold a minority equity interest (any such entity, referred to as a “Joint Venture entity”), and any such jointly owned vessel, referred to as a “Joint Venture vessel”). During 2023, we acquired York Capital’s 51% equity interest in each of the 2018-built, 3,800 TEU capacity containership Polar Brasil and the 2001-built, 1,550 TEU capacity containership Arkadia and, as a result, we obtained 100% of the equity interests in each vessel. The Framework Deed was terminated on December 31, 2024 upon the winding up of the last remaining Joint Venture entity.
Chartering of Our Fleet
Container vessels: We aim to deploy our containership fleet principally under long-term, fixed-rate time charters with leading liner companies that operate on regularly scheduled routes between large commercial ports. As of February 12, 2025, the average (weighted by TEU capacity) remaining time charter duration for our fleet of 68 containerships in the water was approximately 3.4 years, based on the remaining fixed terms and assuming the exercise of any owner’s options and the non-exercise of any charterer’s options under our containerships’ charters.
A time charter is a contract to charter a vessel for a fixed period of time at a set daily rate and can last from a few days up to several years. Under our time charters the charterer pays for most voyage expenses, which generally include, among other things, fuel costs, port and canal charges, pilotages, towages, agencies, commissions, extra war risks insurance and any other expenses related to the cargoes, and we pay for vessel operating expenses, which generally include, among other costs, costs for crewing, provisions, stores, lubricants, insurance, maintenance and repairs, dry-docking and intermediate and special surveys.
Dry bulk vessels: Dry bulk vessels are ordinarily chartered either through a voyage charter or a time charter. Under a voyage charter, the owner agrees to provide a vessel for the transport of dry bulk cargo between specific ports in return for the payment of an agreed freight rate per ton of dry bulk cargo or an agreed dollar lump-sum amount. Voyage costs, such as canal and port charges and bunker expenses, are the responsibility of the owner. Currently our chartering policy is to employ our owned vessels primarily on short-term time charters, which provides us the flexibility to capitalize on any favorable changes in the dry bulk charter rate environment. We will continue to monitor developments in the dry bulk shipping market and, based on market conditions, we may employ our vessels with a mix of short-, medium- and long-term time charters and voyage charters. We believe this policy allows us to obtain attractive charter hire rates for our vessels, while also affording us flexibility to take advantage of a rising charter rate environment without limiting potential upside should the strong market conditions continue.
Our Customers
For our containership fleet, our customers include many of the leading international liner companies, including, among others, A.P. Moller-Maersk, COSCO, Evergreen, Hapag Lloyd, MSC, Yang Ming, ZIM and CMA CGM. A.P. Moller-Maersk, MSC, Evergreen, Hapag Lloyd, ZIM and COSCO together represented 85%, 83% and 84% of our containership revenue in 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively.
While we currently charter our dry bulk vessels primarily for short term tenors with first-class dry bulk charterers, we aim to establish relationships with some of the world’s leading agricultural, mining, manufacturing and commodity trading companies as well as diversified shipping companies. We aim to maintain a diversified group of customers.
Management of Our Fleet
Costamare Shipping serves as the manager for our containerships and dry bulk fleet and provides us with commercial, technical and other services pursuant to the Framework Agreement and separate ship management agreements with the relevant vessel-owning subsidiaries. Costamare Shipping is a ship management company established in 1974 and is controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer. Costamare Shipping has 50 years of experience in managing vessels of various types and sizes, developing specifications for newbuild containerships and supervising the construction of such newbuild vessels in reputable shipyards in the Far East. Costamare Shipping has long established relationships with major liner companies, financial institutions and suppliers and we believe is recognized in the international shipping industry as a leading containership manager.
Costamare Shipping may subcontract certain of its obligations to affiliated managers or to V.Ships Greece or, subject to our consent, to other third-party managers or direct that such affiliated or third-party managers enter into a direct ship-management contract with the relevant vessel-owning subsidiary. Additionally, our sub-managers may, at our request or subject to our consent, subcontract certain services to certain of their affiliates having regard, for instance, to the nationality of the crew or the area of operations of our vessels. As discussed below, these arrangements will not result in any increase in the aggregate amount of management fees we pay. In return for these services, we pay the management fees described below in this section. Costamare Shipping, itself or together with our sub-managers, V.Ships Greece, Navilands, Navilands (Shanghai), Vinnen, HanseContor and FML, provide our fleet with technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase, accounting and insurance services pursuant to separate ship-management agreements between each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries and Costamare Shipping and, in certain cases, the relevant sub-manager. Navilands may subcontract certain services to and enter into a relevant sub-management agreement with Navilands (Shanghai). Navilands and Navilands (Shanghai) are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos.
Blue Net provides under the Brokerage Agreement chartering brokerage services to our containerships, as well as to other third-party containerships. Our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, controls 50% of Blue Net. We believe that the appointment of Blue Net allows us to improve the charter rates at which we charter our containerships. In addition, on March 31, 2020, Costamare Shipping agreed, on behalf of the owners of five containerships it manages, to pay Blue Net Asia, a company 50% controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, a commission of 1.25% of the gross daily hire earned from the charters arranged by Blue Net Asia for those five vessels. Blue Net does not provide its services to the five vessels for which charter brokerage services are being provided by Blue Net Asia.
Costamare Services is a service provider which was established in May 2015 and is controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer and a member of his family. Costamare Services builds on the long-running relationships established by Costamare Shipping with our charterers. Costamare Services provides our vessel-owning subsidiaries with chartering, sale and purchase, insurance and certain representation and administrative services pursuant to the Services Agreement. The Agency Companies provide chartering and other services to Costamare Bulkers.
Our chairman and chief executive officer and our chief financial officer supervise, in conjunction with our board of directors, the services provided by Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services. Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services report to our board of directors through our chairman and chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, each of whom is appointed by our board of directors.
Having multiple management companies provides us with a deep pool of operational management in multiple locations with market-specific experience and relationships, as well as the geographic flexibility needed to manage and crew our large and diverse fleet so as to provide a high level of service, while remaining cost-effective. For example, Navilands (Shanghai) mostly employ Chinese nationals with the language skills and local knowledge we believe are necessary to establish and grow meaningful relationships with Chinese Charterers and suppliers.
We believe that our managers are well regarded in the industry and use state-of-the-art practices and technological advancement to maximize the efficiency of the operation of our fleet of containerships and dry bulk vessels. ISM certification is in place for our fleet of containerships and dry bulk vessels as well as their respective managers. Costamare Shipping and V.Ships Greece are also certified in accordance with ISO 9001-2008 and ISO 14001-2004 relating to quality management and environmental standards. In 2013, the Company received the Lloyd’s List Greek shipping award for Dry Cargo Company of the Year. Costamare Shipping received that same award in 2004. Additionally, in 2014, the Company received the Lloyd’s List Company of the Year award.
As of February 12, 2025,
| • | Costamare Shipping provided commercial and insurance services to all of our containerships and dry bulk vessels, as well as technical, crewing, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase and accounting services to 25 of our containerships; |
| • | V.Ships Greece provided technical, crewing, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase and accounting services to 17 of our containerships and 11 of our dry bulk vessels; |
| • | Vinnen provided technical, crewing, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase and accounting services to five of our containerships; |
| • | HanseContor provided technical, crewing, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase and accounting services to six of our containerships; |
| • | FML provided technical, crewing, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase and accounting services to 13 of our dry bulk vessels; |
| • | Navilands provided technical, crewing, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase and accounting services to six of our dry bulk vessels and to five containerships; and |
| • | Navilands (Shanghai) provided technical, crewing, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase and accounting services to eight of our dry bulk vessels and to 10 containerships. |
Costamare Shipping has agreed that during the term of the Framework Agreement, it will not provide any management services to any entity other than our subsidiaries, entities established pursuant to the Framework Deed and entities affiliated with our chairman and chief executive officer or his family, without our prior written approval, which we may provide under certain circumstances. Currently, Costamare Shipping provides management services to one container vessel, one dry bulk vessel and three offshore vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. Costamare Services has agreed that during the term of the Services Agreement, it will not provide services to any entity other than our subsidiaries and entities affiliated with our chairman and chief executive officer or his family, without our prior written approval. Currently, Costamare Services provides post fixture services in respect of one container vessel partly owned by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. V.Ships Greece, Navilands, Navilands (Shanghai), HanseContor, FML and Vinnen provide and/or may provide services to third parties.
Under the restrictive covenant agreement between the Company and Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, during the period of his employment or service with the Company and for six months thereafter, he has agreed to restrictions on his ownership of any containerships and dry bulk vessels or the acquisition, investment in or control of any business involved in the ownership or operation of containerships or dry bulk vessels, subject to certain exceptions. Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos has also agreed that if one of our vessels and a vessel majority owned by him are both available and meet the criteria for an available charter, our vessel will receive such charter. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Restrictive Covenant Agreements”.
In the event that Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services decide to delegate certain or all of the services they have agreed to perform under the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement, respectively, either through (i) subcontracting to a sub-manager or sub-provider or (ii) by directing such sub-manager or sub-provider to enter into a direct agreement with the relevant vessel-owning subsidiary, then, in the case of subcontracting under (i), Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, will be responsible for paying the fee charged by the relevant sub-manager or sub-provider for providing such services and, in the case of a direct agreement under (ii), the fee received by Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, will be reduced by the fee payable to the sub-manager or sub-provider under the relevant direct agreement. As a result, these arrangements will not result in any increase in the aggregate management fees and services fees that we pay. In addition to management fees, we pay for any capital expenditures, financial costs, operating expenses and any general and administrative expenses, including payments to third parties, including specialist providers, in accordance with the Framework Agreement and the relevant separate ship-management agreements or supervision agreements.
Costamare Shipping received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of $1,020 per day pro-rated for the calendar days we own each vessel. This fee is reduced to $510 per day in the case of any vessel subject to a bareboat charter. We will also pay to Costamare Shipping a flat fee of $839,988 per newbuild vessel for the supervision of the construction of any newbuild vessel that we may contract. Costamare Shipping received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of 0.15% on all gross freight, demurrage, charter hire and ballast bonus or other income earned with respect to each vessel in our fleet. Costamare Services received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of 1.10%, on all gross freight, demurrage, charter hire and ballast bonus or other income earned with respect to each vessel in our fleet and a quarterly fee of (i) $666,737 and (ii) an amount equal to the value of 149,600 shares, based on the average closing price of our common stock on the NYSE for the 10 days ending on the 30th day of the last month of each quarter; provided that Costamare Services may elect to receive 149,600 shares instead of the fee under (ii). We have reserved a number of shares of common stock to cover the fees to be paid to Costamare Services under (ii) through December 31, 2025. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services charged aggregate fees of $64.6 million and $63.7 million, respectively, including $10.5 million and $14.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, charged by third-party managers. The aforementioned fees include the value of the 598,400 shares we issued within each year pursuant to the Services Agreement, to Costamare Services. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2024, Costamare Shipping charged, in aggregate, to the vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, $1.7 million for services provided in accordance with the relevant agreements, including $0.8 million charged by third-party managers. Furthermore, during the year ended December 31, 2023, Costamare Shipping charged, in aggregate, to the companies established pursuant to the Framework Deed and to the vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, $3.0 million, for services provided in accordance with the relevant agreements, including $0.9 million charged by third-party managers.
On December 31, 2024, the terms of the Framework Agreement and the Services Agreement automatically renewed for another one-year period and will automatically renew for ten more consecutive one-year periods until December 31, 2035. The daily fee for each vessel and the supervision fee in respect of each vessel under construction payable to Costamare Shipping under the Framework Agreement and the quarterly fee payable to Costamare Services under the Services Agreement (other than the portion of the fee in clause (ii) above which is calculated on the basis of our share price) will be annually adjusted to reflect any strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar of more than 5% per year and/or material unforeseen cost increases. We are able to terminate the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement, subject to a termination fee, by providing written notice to Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, at least 12 months before the end of the subsequent one-year term. The termination fee is equal to (a) the number of full years remaining prior to December 31, 2035, times (b) the aggregate fees due and payable to Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, during the 12-month period ending on the date of termination (without taking into account any reduction in fees under the Framework Agreement to reflect that certain obligations have been delegated to a sub-manager or a sub-provider, as applicable); provided that the termination fee will always be at least two times the aggregate fees over the 12-month period described above. Information about other termination events under the Management Agreements is set forth in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management Agreements—Term and Termination Rights”.
Pursuant to the terms of the Framework Agreement, the separate ship-management agreements, the supervision agreements and the Services Agreement, liability of Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services to us is limited to instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services. Further, we are required to indemnify Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services for liabilities incurred by them in performance of the Framework Agreement, separate ship-management agreements, supervision agreements and the Services Agreement respectively, in each case except in instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services.
Competition
We operate in markets that are highly competitive and based primarily on supply and demand. Generally, we compete for charters based upon charter rate, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and vessel specifications, size, age and condition. Competition for providing containership and dry bulk services comes from a number of experienced shipping companies. In addition, in recent years, there have been other entrants in the market, such as leasing companies and private equity firms who have significant capital to invest in vessel ownership, which has provided for additional competition in both sectors.
Containership vessels: Participants in the container shipping industry include “liner” shipping companies, who operate container shipping services and own containerships, containership owners, often known as “charter owners”, who own containerships and charter them out to liner companies, and shippers who require the seaborne movement of containerized goods. Historically, a significant share of the world’s containership capacity has been owned by the liner companies, but since the 1990s, there has been a trend for the liner companies to charter-in a larger proportion of the capacity that they operate as a way of retaining some degree of flexibility with regard to capital spending levels over time given the significant costs associated with purchasing vessels.
We believe that the containership sector of the international shipping industry is characterized by the significant time required to develop the operating expertise and professional reputation necessary to obtain and retain customers. We believe that our development of a large fleet of containerships with varying TEU capacities has enhanced our relationship with our principal charterers by enabling them to serve the East-West, North-South and Intra-regional trade routes efficiently, while enabling us to operate in the different rate environments prevailing for those routes. We also believe that our focus on customer service and reliability enhances our relationships with our charterers. In the past decade, we have had successful chartering relationships with the majority of the top 20 liner companies by TEU capacity.
In the past, we have been able to address the periodic scarcity of secondhand containerships available for acquisition in the open market through the acquisition of containerships mainly from our liner company customers in privately negotiated sales. In connection with these acquisitions, we then typically charter back the vessels to these customers. We believe we have been able to pursue these privately negotiated acquisitions because of our long-standing customer relations, which we do not believe new entrants have.
Dry bulk vessels: Unlike the containership sector, ownership of dry bulk vessels is highly fragmented with approximately 14,100 vessels in the global fleet. The largest dry bulk vessel owner group is China COSCO Shipping, with a fleet of 318 vessels with an aggregate carrying capacity of approximately 35.9 million dwt, while the rest of the top 5 in terms of total dwt capacity is comprised of Japan’s NYK (197 vessels with an aggregate carrying capacity of approximately 22.2 million dwt), Norway’s Fredriksen Group (107 vessels with an aggregate carrying capacity of approximately 15.1 million dwt), Greece’s Star Bulk Carriers (151 vessels with an aggregate carrying capacity of approximately 14.6 million dwt) and Berge Bulk (69 vessels with an aggregate carrying capacity of approximately 13.1 million dwt).
Crewing and Shore Employees
We have three shore-based officers, our chairman and chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our general counsel and secretary. We do not pay any compensation to our officers for their services as officers. Our officers are employed by and receive compensation for their services from Costamare Shipping and/or Costamare Services. Our chief financial officer and a non-independent board member are also employed by and receive compensation from Costamare Bulkers. As of December 31, 2024, Costamare Shipping, Costamare Services, Costamare Bulkers, the Agency Companies and the Neptune Manager employed in aggregate approximately 290 shore-based employees and approximately 2,430 seafarers were serving on our vessels. Our managers are responsible for recruiting, either directly or through manning agents, the officers and crew for our containerships and dry bulk vessels that they manage. We believe the streamlining of crewing arrangements through our managers ensures that all of our vessels will be crewed with experienced crews that have the qualifications and licenses required by international regulations and shipping conventions. We have not experienced any material work stoppages due to labor disagreements during the past three years.
Seasonality
We operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter hire rates. This seasonality may result in quarter to quarter volatility in our operating results. In particular, the containership market is typically stronger in the third quarter of the year in anticipation of the holiday season while the dry bulk market is typically stronger in the fall in anticipation of increased consumption of coal in the northern hemisphere during the winter months and the grain export season from North America and in the spring months in anticipation of the South American grain export season due to increased distance traveled known as ton mile effect, as well as increased coal imports in parts of Asia due to additional electricity demand for cooling during the summer months. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities.
Permits and Authorizations
We are required by various governmental and other agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses, certificates and financial assurances with respect to each of our vessels. The kinds of permits, licenses, certificates and financial assurances required by governmental and other agencies depend upon several factors, including the commodity being transported, the waters in which the vessel operates, the nationality of the vessel’s crew and the type and age of the vessel. All permits, licenses, certificates and financial assurances currently required to operate our vessels have been obtained (exclusive of cargo-specific documentation, for which charterers or shippers are responsible). Additional laws and regulations, environmental or otherwise, may be adopted which could limit our ability to do business or increase the cost of doing business.
Our Dry Bulk Operating Platform
Chartering-in/out
In 2022, the Company formed a dry bulk operating platform to charter-in/out dry bulk vessels, enter into contracts of affreightment, forward freight agreements and utilize hedging solutions, utilizing an active approach in order to improve margins, grow its network of customers and afford it the flexibility to take advantage of favorable market conditions in the dry bulk physical and derivative freight markets. We expanded our presence globally with the establishment of offices in Athens and Monaco and by contracting with agencies in Copenhagen, Hamburg, Singapore and Japan. We aim to charter-in vessels from reputable shipowners and subsequently charter-out such vessels on a voyage charter or sub time charter basis with third-party charterers. As a result, we have been fixing an increasing number of vessels on voyage charters and we have been entering in contracts of affreightment directly with cargo providers. We believe that our dry bulk operating platform provides added flexibility to changing market conditions and generates synergies with our dry bulk fleet.
As of February 12, 2025, the dry bulk operating platform has chartered-in for a period, 50 vessels with a total carrying capacity of approximately 7,997,000 dwt, all of which have already been delivered and subsequently are or will be employed under voyage charters or sub time charters. Additionally, the dry bulk operating platform has contracted to charter-in two vessels, which are currently under construction, once they are delivered to their third-party owners.
Forward Freight Agreements and Other Derivative Products
Our dry bulk operating platform uses forward freight agreements to establish market positions or to hedge its exposure on chartered-in vessels. It also endeavors to use bunker swaps to hedge its exposure to bunker prices.
Our Counterparties
Our dry bulk operating platform endeavors to charter-in dry bulk vessels from reputable shipowners around the world, that own vessels which meet its trading and specifications criteria.
With its chartered-in fleet, our dry bulk operating platform endeavors to provide freight services to a wide base of customers by transporting dry bulk commodities worldwide. Its customers include agricultural, mining, manufacturing and commodity trading companies as well as diversified shipping companies.
Through its global presence our dry bulk operating platform endeavors to develop long-lasting relationships both with shipowners and customers, in order to help maintain continuous access to suitable vessels and cargoes.
Agency Companies
Costamare Bulkers receives chartering, cargo sourcing and/or research services by approximately 50 professionals working out of privately owned agency companies set up in Copenhagen, Hamburg, Singapore and Japan, which are referred to elsewhere in this annual report as Local Agency A, Local Agency B, Local Agency C and Local Agency D, respectively. Three of the agency companies are controlled by Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and one of the agency companies is controlled by Gregory Zikos, our Chief Financial Officer.
CBI may also charter out its vessels to Local Agency C, as shippers in Asia and the Australia-Pacific region prefer to deal with a chartering company based in Singapore. Local Agency C does not receive any commissions whatsoever for such arrangements as it is acting in the circumstances as a “paying/receiving agent” for CBI. All the economic results of the relevant charter-out arrangements by Local Agency C are passed onto CBI on a back-to-back basis, including any address commissions received by Local Agency C.
We believe that having several agency companies service the CBI fleet vessels provides Costamare Inc. with a deep pool of operational expertise and capabilities in multiple locations with market-specific experience and relationships, and geographic flexibility for our large and diverse fleet so as to provide a high level of service while remaining cost-effective.
Our Lease Financing Platform
In March 2023, we entered into an agreement with Neptune and its shareholders pursuant to which we agreed to invest in Neptune’s ship sale and leaseback business up to $200 million in exchange for up to 40% of its ordinary shares and up to 79.05% of its preferred shares. In addition, we received a special ordinary share in Neptune which carries 75% of the voting rights of the ordinary shares providing control over Neptune. Neptune was established in 2021 to acquire and bareboat charter out vessels through wholly-owned subsidiaries. Neptune’s strategy is to build a portfolio of long-term contracts through sale and leaseback transactions in the maritime sector. Neptune endeavors to obtain bank financing to finance on a back to back basis part of the financing it extends to its clients. As of February 12, 2025, we have invested in Neptune the amount of $123.3 million and own 36.6% of Neptune’s ordinary shares and 73.2% of its preferred shares. At the time that we obtained control of Neptune, Neptune had one containership and three dry bulk vessels under sale and leaseback arrangements. As of February 12, 2025, Neptune is currently funding or committed to funding 37 shipping assets and Neptune’s portfolio of sale and leaseback arrangements and commitments includes 19 dry bulk vessels, three tanker vessels and 15 offshore vessels.
Our Counterparties
Our lease financing platform endeavors to finance diverse vessels types, that meet its financing criteria and to develop long-lasting relationships both with shipowners and financiers, in order to help maintain continuous access to dealflow.
Neptune Manager
Neptune receives administrative, strategic, accounting and tax as well as insurance arrangements and vessel related services in respect of vessels being financed or to be financed from the Neptune Manager. The Neptune Manager is majority owned by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, with the general manager and member of the board of directors of Neptune holding a minority stake in the Neptune Manager.
Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance
General
The operation of any vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, property loss or damage, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to a number of reasons, including political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental incidents, as well as other liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”), which imposes under certain circumstances, unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of vessels trading in the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability insurance more expensive for shipowners and operators trading in the United States market.
We maintain hull and machinery marine risks insurance and hull and machinery and loss of hire war risks insurance for our fleet of containerships and dry bulk vessels to cover normal risks in our operations and in amounts that we believe to be prudent to cover such risks. In addition, we maintain protection and indemnity insurance up to the maximum insurable limit available at any given time. While we believe that our insurance coverage will be adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates or at all, or that any specific claim we may make under our insurance coverage will be paid. In addition, our insurers may not be contractually obligated or may be prohibited from posting security or covering costs or losses associated with certain incidents (for example, casualties in sanctioned locations like Iran).
Hull & Machinery Marine Risks Insurance, Hull & Machinery War Risks Insurance and Loss of Hire Insurance
We maintain hull and machinery marine risks insurance and hull and machinery war risks insurance, which cover the risk of particular average, general average, 4/4ths collision liability and actual or constructive total loss in accordance with the Institute Time Clauses - Hulls – 1.10.83, except for the war risk insurance, which is in accordance with the rules of the Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd. Each of our vessels is insured up to what we believe to be at least its fair market value, after meeting certain deductibles.
We do not and will not obtain loss of hire insurance (or any other kind of business interruption insurance) covering the loss of revenue during off-hire periods, other than due to war risks, for any of our vessels because we believe that this type of coverage is not economical and is of limited value to us, in part because historically our vessels have had a very limited number of off-hire days.
Protection and Indemnity Insurance—Pollution Coverage
Protection and indemnity insurance is usually provided by a protection and indemnity association (a “P&I association”) and covers third-party liability, crew liability and other related expenses resulting from the injury or death of crew, passengers and other third parties, the loss or damage to cargo, third-party claims arising from collisions with other vessels (to the extent not recovered by the hull and machinery policies), damage to other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal.
Our protection and indemnity insurance is provided by a P&I association which is a member of the International Group of P&I Clubs (“International Group”). The 12 P&I associations that comprise the International Group insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial blue-water tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. Insurance provided by a P&I association is a form of mutual indemnity insurance.
Our protection and indemnity insurance coverage is currently subject to a limit of about $1 billion per vessel per incident for pollution.
As a member of a P&I association, which is a member of the International Group, we will be subject to calls payable to the P&I association based on the International Group’s claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the P&I association of which we are a member.
Freight Demurrage & Defense Insurance
We maintain legal and associated costs insurance (“FD&D”) for our fleet of dry bulk vessels through a member of the International Group. FD&D insurance provides cover for legal and associated costs incurred in disputes arising in connection with the owning and operating of the covered vessel. The disputed sum itself is not insured. Costs include legal fees but may also include, for example, surveyor’s and expert’s fees incurred either in bringing or for defending a claim. Disputes under charterparties are the most common type of claim that is covered, but cover is also provided for other types of disputes.
Charterers’ Liability Insurance
We maintain Charterers’ Liability Cover through a P&I association which is a member of the International Group, subject to a limit of $500 million per event. This cover includes protection and indemnity insurance, FD&D insurance, war risks and extended liability cover (“ELC”). ELC is an additional layer of cover for onerous contractual liabilities not covered under the ordinary protection and indemnity policy. We also maintain bunkers insurance, which extends the ambit of the protection and indemnity coverage to include the bunkers carried on board.
Inspection by Classification Societies
Every seagoing vessel must be “classed” by a classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel is “in class”, signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel’s country of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned.
The classification society also undertakes on request other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case and/or to the regulations of the country concerned.
For maintenance of the class, regular and occasional surveys of hull and machinery, including the electrical plant and any special equipment classed, are required to be performed as follows:
Annual Surveys. For seagoing ships, annual surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery, including the electrical plant, and where applicable, on special equipment classed at intervals of 12 months from the date of commencement of the class period indicated in the certificate.
Intermediate Surveys. Extended annual surveys are referred to as intermediate surveys and typically are conducted two and one-half years after commissioning and each class renewal. Intermediate surveys may be carried out on the occasion of the second or third annual survey. According to the type and age of the ship, the examinations of the hull may be supplemented by thickness measurements as specified in the classification society’s rules and as deemed necessary by the attending surveyor.
Class Renewal Surveys. Class renewal surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out on the ship’s hull and machinery, including the electrical plant, and on any special equipment classed at the intervals indicated by the character of classification for the ship. During the special survey, the vessel is thoroughly examined, including ultrasonic gauging to determine the thickness of the steel structures. Should the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the classification society would prescribe steel renewals. Class renewal surveys/special surveys are carried out at five-year intervals. The special survey may be commenced at the fourth annual survey or between the fourth and fifth annual surveys. Consideration may be given by class, in exceptional circumstances, to granting an extension for a maximum period of three months after the due date. Substantial amounts of funds may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a special survey if the vessel experiences excessive wear and tear. In lieu of the special survey arrangement at which ship’s hull and structure, equipment and systems are surveyed at five-year intervals, a shipowner has the option of arranging with the classification society for the vessel’s hull or machinery to be on a continuous survey cycle, in which survey items of the vessel are subject to separate surveys. This process is referred to as continuous class renewal. All areas subject to surveys as defined by the classification society are required to be surveyed at least once per class period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are otherwise prescribed. The period between two consecutive surveys of each area must not exceed five years.
All vessels are also required to be subject to bottom surveys and dry-docking for inspection of their underwater parts and for repairs related to such inspections. Two bottom surveys are required during each five-year period of the classification certificate and the interval between any two successive bottoms surveys is in no case to exceed 36 months. One bottom survey (dry-docking) shall be carried out in conjunction with the special survey. Every alternate bottom survey may be permitted afloat provided certain design conditions are met, except for dry bulk vessels exceeding 15 years of age, which are required to be dry-docked at least every two and a half years, in conjunction with the main class intermediate and the special surveys. If any defects are found, the classification surveyor will issue a “condition of class or memorandum” which must be rectified by the shipowner within prescribed time limits and at the latest during the next special survey.
Insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a vessel be certified as “in class” by a classification society which is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies (“IACS”). All of our vessels are certified as being “in class” by members of IACS.
The following table lists the dates by which we expect to carry out the next dry-dockings and special surveys for the vessels in our current vessel fleets:
Dry-docking Schedule(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of Containerships | | 15 | | | 18 | | | 8 | | | 15 | | | 9 | |
Number of Dry Bulk Vessels | | 11 | | | 9 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 11 | |
(1) | Excludes one dry bulk vessel that we have agreed to sell. |
Environmental and Other Regulations
Government regulation significantly affects the ownership and operation of our vessels. We are subject to international conventions and national, port state and local laws and regulations applicable to international waters and/or territorial waters of the countries in which our vessels may operate or are registered, including laws and regulations governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and the management of other contamination, air emissions, grey water and ballast water management and climate change. These laws and regulations include Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”), the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the U.S. Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and regulations adopted by the IMO, including MARPOL and the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (“SOLAS”), as well as regulations enacted by the European Union and other international, national and local regulatory bodies. Compliance with these laws, regulations and other requirements necessitates significant expense, including vessel modifications and implementation of certain operating procedures.
A variety of governmental and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. These entities include the local port authorities Port State Control (such as the U.S. Coast Guard, harbor master or equivalent), classification societies, flag state administration (country of registry) and charterers. Several of these entities require us to obtain permits, licenses, financial assurances and certificates for the operation of our vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or result in the temporary suspension of operation of one or more of our vessels in one or more ports.
Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to the strictest environmental standards. We are required to maintain operating standards for all of our vessels that emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of our officers and crews and compliance with U.S. and international regulations. Our affiliated managers and V.Ships Greece are certified in accordance with ISO 9001-2008 and ISO 14001-2004 (relating to quality management and environmental standards, respectively). Costamare Shipping is also certified to the environmental Standard ISO 50001-2011. We believe that operations of our vessels are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and that our vessels have all material permits, licenses, certificates and other authorizations necessary for their operation.
IMO Requirements
Our vessels are subject to standards imposed by the IMO, the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by ships. The IMO has adopted regulations that are designed to reduce pollution in international waters and in the atmosphere, both from accidents and from routine operations, and has negotiated international conventions that impose liability for oil pollution in international waters and a signatory’s territorial waters. For example, Annex VI to MARPOL sets limits on sulphur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from vessel exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulphur content of fuel oil and requirements for ships to collect data on fuel oil consumption and carbon dioxide emissions.
Amendments to Annex VI effective from January 1, 2020, seek to reduce air pollution from vessels by, among other things, establishing a series of progressive requirements to further limit the sulphur content of fuel oil and by establishing new tiers of nitrogen oxide emission standards for new marine diesel engines, depending on their date of installation. These requirements include a global sulphur cap of 0.5% m/m which became effective in 2020, and is a significant reduction from the 3.5% m/m global limit previously in place. Vessels must either be equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers, which allow the vessel to use the existing, less expensive, high sulphur content fuel, or have undertaken fuel system modification and tank cleaning, which allows the vessel to use more expensive, low sulphur fuel. Vessels that are not equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers cannot have high sulphur content fuel on board. We currently have exhaust gas scrubbers in 23 of our vessels (15 containerships and eight dry bulk vessels). Presently, 23 of the 50 vessels period chartered-in through our dry bulk operating platform (out of which three are vessels chartered-in from our owned fleet) are equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers. Vessels that do not have exhaust gas scrubbers installed are using low sulphur content fuel in compliance with applicable regulations.
Annex VI also provides for the establishment of special areas, known as Emission Control Areas (“ECAs”), where more stringent controls on sulphur and other emissions apply. Currently, the Baltic Sea area, the North Sea area, the Mediterranean Sea, certain coastal areas of North America (off of the United States and Canada) and the U.S. Caribbean Sea area (around Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands) are designated as ECAs. The Mediterranean Sea became an ECA on May 1, 2024, and compliance obligations will begin May 1, 2025. The emissions restrictions of the Mediterranean ECA are the same as the other ECAs, mandating the use of fuel oil with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.10% or the use of an exhaust gas cleaning system. In October 2024, at MEPC 82, the IMO adopted amendments to Annex VI to designate the Canadian Arctic and Norwegian Sea as two new ECAs for nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and particulate matter. The amendments will enter into force on March 1, 2026. Additional ECAs may be established in the future.
IMO nitrous oxide (NOx) Tier III requirements, the most demanding to date, took effect in North American and U.S. Caribbean ECAs in 2016 for vessels with a keel-laying date on or after January 1, 2016 and an engine output in excess of 130kW. For vessels constructed (keel-laying) on or after January 1, 2021 and operating in the Baltic Sea ECA or the North Sea ECA, any marine diesel engine installed with output in excess of 130 kW must comply with the NOx Tier III standard. However, if other ECAs for NOx are implemented, the NOx Tier III requirements will not be retroactive and the Tier III emission limits for any new NOx ECAs (e.g., for the North Sea and Baltic Sea) will become applicable to vessels with keel-laying as of the date that the new NOx ECAs go into effect.
Amendments to MARPOL Annex VI, which entered into force in 2018, require ships of 5,000 gross tonnage and above to collect consumption data for each type of fuel they use, as well as additional data, including proxies for transport work. The aggregated data must be reported to the ship’s flag state (“Flag Administration”) on an annual basis. In April 2024, at MEPC 81, the IMO adopted amendments to Appendix IX of MARPOL Annex VI, which introduced increased data granularity requirements, including, among other things, the reporting of fuel consumption per consumer type and data on transport work. These amendments will enter into force on August 1, 2025. All our existing vessels have submitted to their Flag Administration the data required by regulation 22A of MARPOL Annex VI, covering ship operations for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023. The data was collected and reported in accordance with the methodology and processes set out in the vessels’ Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan and the vessels are now carrying the relevant Statement of Compliance in accordance with the Fuel Oil Data Collection System. For the fourth reporting period, which is for the year ended December 2024, we expect the necessary data will be submitted to each ship’s flag by March 31, 2025.
All our vessels are compliant in all material respects with current Annex VI requirements, however, if new ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent air emission requirements are adopted by the IMO or the states where we expect to operate, compliance with these requirements could entail significant additional capital expenditures, operational changes or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.
Amendments to MARPOL Annex V (regulation for the prevention of pollution by garbage from ships) entered into force in 2018. The changes included criteria for determining whether cargo residues are harmful to the marine environment, and a new Garbage Record Book format with a new garbage category for e-waste. Although all our existing vessels are compliant with MARPOL Annex V requirements, the amendments could cause us to incur additional operational costs for the handling of garbage produced on our fleet.
In addition, MEPC of the IMO adopted two sets of mandatory requirements to address GHG emissions from ships that entered into force in 2013. The Energy Efficiency Design Index (“EEDI”) requires ships to achieve a minimum energy efficiency level per capacity mile and is applicable to new vessels, and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan is applicable to currently operating vessels. The requirements may cause us to incur additional compliance costs.
In June 2021, at MEPC 76, MEPC finalized and adopted amendments to the MARPOL Annex VI that also require ships to reduce their GHG emissions. These amendments combine technical and operational approaches to improve the energy efficiency of ships, and provide important building blocks for future GHG reduction measures. The measures require all ships to calculate their Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (“EEXI”) following technical means to improve their energy efficiency and to establish their annual operational carbon intensity indicator (“CII”) and CII rating. The amendments entered into force on November 1, 2022, and the requirements for EEXI and CII certification entered into force on January 1, 2023. Attained EEXI shall be calculated for ships of 400 gross tonnage and above, in accordance with the different values set for ship types and size categories and verified by class. EEXI indicates the energy efficiency of the ship compared to a baseline. Ships are required to meet a specific required EEXI (the “Required EEXI”), which is based on a mandated reduction factor (expressed as a percentage relative to the EEDI baseline). When a ship’s attained EEDI does not meet the Required EEXI threshold, technical modification options may be considered for compliance (e.g., engine/ shaft power limitation, retrofit of energy saving technologies, alternative fuels).
A ship’s CII determines the annual reduction factor needed to ensure continuous improvement of the ship’s operational carbon intensity within a specific rating level. The actual annual operational CII achieved must be documented and verified against the required annual operational CII. This enables the operational carbon intensity rating to be determined. The rating is given on a scale–operational carbon intensity rating A, B, C, D, or E–indicating a major superior, minor superior, moderate, minor inferior, or inferior performance level. The performance level is recorded in the ship’s Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan. A ship rated D for three consecutive years, or E, will have to submit a corrective action plan, to show how the required index (C or above) will be achieved.
As a result of the IMO’s continuous work to contribute to global efforts against climate change, it adopted an initial GHG reduction strategy in April 2018. This strategy established levels of ambition for emissions reductions subject to ongoing reviews by the organization. The ambition levels considered potential improvements on vessel design and operational performance as well as the immediate need to introduce low/zero carbon fuels, and introduced a list of candidate short-term, mid-term and long-term measures to support the IMO’s ambition levels. Short-term measures included the evaluation and improvement of vessel energy efficiency requirements, the application of technical efficiency measures for existing ships and the introduction and regulation of carbon intensity for ships in operation. Mid-term and long-term measures included development of an implementation program for alternative low/zero carbon fuels, adoption of other possible innovative emission reduction mechanism(s) and market-based measures to incentivize GHG emissions reductions. The levels of ambition and indicative checkpoints consider the Well-to-Wake (WtW) GHG emissions of marine fuels, as addressed in the Guidelines on life-cycle GHG intensity of marine fuels life-cycle analysis (LCA) Guidelines, with the overall objective of reducing GHG emissions of international shipping without shifting such emissions to other sectors.
In July 2023, the IMO adopted the 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships, which provided new mid-term emissions reduction goals and built upon the initial strategy’s levels of ambition. The revised levels of ambition include (1) further decreasing the carbon intensity from ships through improvement of energy efficiency; (2) reducing carbon intensity of international shipping; (3) increasing adoption of zero or near-zero emissions technologies, fuels, and energy sources to represent at least 5%, striving for 10%, of the energy used by international shipping by 2030 and (4) achieving net zero GHG emissions from international shipping. A basket of mid-term measures to reduce GHG emissions that combines technical and economical elements was finalized at MEPC 81 in March 2024, and will ultimately enter into force in 2027. Potential long-term measures may be finalized and agreed by MEPC beyond 2030. Implementation of the framework through regulatory measures may require additional capital expenditures to achieve compliance with new emissions reduction targets across the shipping sector and increased use of zero or near-zero GHG emission technologies, among other obligations. We are unable to accurately predict the ultimate scope of such measures and their potential impact on our operations once implemented.
Emissions monitoring and varying emission requirements present significant challenges for vessel owners and operators. To address the potential compliance challenges for some of the existing vessels, particularly the older ones, while keeping in line with the IMO strategy’s levels of ambition, the EU ETS and the FuelEU Maritime Regulation, we may incur significant capital expenditures to apply efficiency improvement measures and meet the Required EEXI threshold, for example with respect to shaft/engine power limitation (power optimization), fuel change, energy saving devices and ship replacement. The EEXI regulatory framework may also accelerate the scrapping of older tonnage, while the adoption of shaft/engine power limitation as measures to comply with the amendments may lead to the continuing prevalence of slow steaming to even lower speeds which could result in contracting/ building of new ships to replace any reduction in capacity.
The impact of these requirements on our business and operations, including any necessary capital expenditures, is difficult to accurately predict at this time.
Fifteen years after the IMO’s initial adoption of the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, 2009, a sufficient number of contracting states have ratified the Convention, and it will enter into force on June 26, 2025. The Convention introduces regulations covering the design, construction, operation and preparation of ships in order to facilitate recycling and the operation of ship recycling facilities and establishes an enforcement mechanism for ship recycling, incorporating certification and reporting requirements. Pursuant to the Convention, ships must have an Inventory of Hazardous Materials specific to each ship on board, which must be prepared and verified in line with IMO guidelines. In addition to that initial verification, ships will be subject to additional surveys during the life of the ship, and a final survey prior to recycling.
In 2022, the IMO amended MARPOL Annex I to prohibit the use of Heavy Fuel Oil, or “HFO,” in Artic waters, which came into force in July 2024. The amendment prohibits the use of oils having a density at 15°C higher than 900 kg/m3 or a kinematic viscosity at 50°C higher than 180 mm2/s. Parties to MARPOL with coastlines bordering Arctic waters may temporarily waive the requirements for ships flying their flags while operating in waters subject to that Party’s sovereignty or jurisdiction until July 1, 2029. Our vessels are required to adhere to this prohibition.
Other International Requirements
Concerns surrounding climate change may lead certain international or multinational bodies or individual countries to propose and/or adopt new climate change initiatives. For example, in 2015, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a framework for reducing global GHG emissions, with the goal of holding the increase in global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius and pursuing efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius. In October 2016, the EU formally ratified the Paris Agreement, thus establishing its entry into force on November 4, 2016. Although the Paris Agreement does not specifically require controls on shipping or other industries, it is possible that countries or groups of countries will seek to impose such controls as they implement the Paris Agreement, which may cause us to incur capital expenditures and/or increase our operating costs in the future.
The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (the “Bunker Convention”), which became effective in November 2008, imposes strict liability on vessel owners for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker fuel. The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of vessels over 1,000 gross tons to maintain insurance in specified amounts to cover liability for bunker fuel pollution damage. Each of our containerships has been issued a certificate attesting that insurance is in force in accordance with the Bunker Convention. The IMO also adopted the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (the “BWM Convention”), which entered into force in 2017. Under the BWM Convention, each vessel is required to have on board a valid International Ballast Water Management Certificate, a Ballast Water Management Plan and a Ballast Water Record Book. Compliance with the standards pertaining to the treatment of the ballast water (“D-2 Standard”) requires, in most cases, existing ships to install a ballast water treatment system by the ship’s first International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate (“IOPPC”) renewal survey after September 8, 2019, while vessels constructed (keel laying performed) after September 8, 2017 must have an approved BWM system installed on delivery. This implementation schedule was designed to ensure full global implementation by September 8, 2024. For existing vessels we have installed treatment systems to comply with the D-2 standard at the time of the periodical dry-docking of the relevant vessels.
The operation of our vessels is based on the requirements set forth in the ISM Code. The ISM Code requires vessel managers to develop and maintain an extensive SMS that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy, sets forth instructions and procedures for safe vessel operation and describes procedures for dealing with emergencies. The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain an SMC for each vessel they operate from the government of the vessel’s flag state. The certificate verifies that the vessel operates in compliance with its approved SMS. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless the flag state has issued a document of compliance with the ISM Code to the vessel’s manager. Failure to comply with the ISM Code may lead to withdrawal of the permit to manage or operate the vessels, subject such party to increased liability, decrease or suspend available insurance coverage for the affected vessels, or result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Each vessel in our fleet and each of our affiliated managers and third-party managers are ISM Code-certified.
United States Requirements
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection of the environment from oil spills and cleanup of oil spills. OPA 90 applies to discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of fuel and lubricants. OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the United States, its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in U.S. waters, which include the United States’ territorial sea and its two hundred nautical mile exclusive economic zone. While we do not carry oil as cargo, we do carry fuel in our containerships, making them subject to the requirements of OPA 90.
Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the discharge of pollutants results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of pollutants from their vessels, including bunkers. OPA 90 defines these other damages broadly to include:
| • | natural resource damages and the costs of assessment thereof; |
| • | real and personal property damage; |
| • | net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees and other lost revenues; |
| • | lost profits or impairment of earning capacity due to property or natural resource damages; and |
| • | net cost of public services necessitated by a spill response, such as protection from fire, safety or health hazards, and loss of subsistence use of natural resources. |
OPA 90 preserves the right to recover damages under other existing laws, including maritime tort law.
Effective March 23, 2023, the OPA liability limitation under U.S. Coast Guard regulations was increased to the greater of $1,300 per gross ton or $1,076,000 per incident for non-tank vessels, subject to periodic future adjustments of such limits. These limitations of liability do not apply if an incident was directly caused by violation of applicable U.S. safety, construction or operating regulations or by a responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with oil removal activities.
The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) applies to spills or releases of hazardous substances other than petroleum or petroleum products whether on land or at sea. CERCLA imposes joint and several liability, without regard to fault, on the owner or operator of a vessel, vehicle or facility from which there has been a release, along with other specified parties. Costs recoverable under CERCLA include cleanup and removal costs, natural resource damages and governmental oversight costs. Liability under CERCLA is generally limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5.0 million for vessels carrying any hazardous substances, such as cargo or residue, or $0.5 million for any other vessel, per release of or incident involving hazardous substances. These limits of liability do not apply if the incident is caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability is unlimited.
All owners and operators of vessels over 300 gross tons are required to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under OPA 90 and CERCLA. Under the U.S. Coast Guard regulations, vessel owners and operators may evidence their financial responsibility by providing proof of insurance, surety bond, guarantee, letter of credit or self-insurance. An owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the vessel in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under OPA 90 and CERCLA. Under the self-insurance provisions, the vessel owner or operator must have a net worth and working capital that exceeds the applicable amount of financial responsibility, measured in assets located in the United States against liabilities located anywhere in the world.
U.S. Coast Guard regulations concerning certificates of financial responsibility provide, in accordance with OPA 90, that claimants may bring suit directly against an insurer or guarantor that furnishes certificates of financial responsibility. In the event that such insurer or guarantor is sued directly, it is prohibited from asserting any contractual defense that it may have had against the responsible party and is limited to asserting those defenses available to the responsible party and the defense that the incident was caused by the willful misconduct of the responsible party. Certain organizations, which had typically provided certificates of financial responsibility under pre-OPA 90 laws, including the major P&I associations, have declined to furnish evidence of insurance for vessel owners and operators if they are subject to direct actions or required to waive insurance policy defenses.
OPA 90 specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their borders, coasts and territorial seas, and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for entities found responsible for oil spills. In some cases, states which have enacted such legislation have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessels owners’ responsibilities under these laws. We intend to comply with all applicable state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.
We currently maintain, for each of our vessels, oil pollution liability coverage insurance in the amount of $1.0 billion per vessel per incident. In addition, we carry hull and machinery protection and indemnity insurance to cover the risks of fire and explosion. Although our vessels only carry bunker fuel, a spill of oil from one of our vessels could be catastrophic under certain circumstances. Losses as a result of fire or explosion could also be catastrophic under some conditions. While we believe that our present insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and if the damages from a catastrophic spill exceeded our insurance coverage, the payment of those damages could have an adverse effect on our business or the results of our operations.
Title VII of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 (the “CGMTA”) amended OPA 90 to require the owner or operator of any non-tank vessel of 400 gross tons or more that carries oil of any kind as a fuel for main propulsion, including bunker fuel, to prepare and submit a response plan for each vessel. These vessel response plans include detailed information on actions to be taken by vessel personnel to prevent or mitigate any discharge or substantial threat of such a discharge of oil from the vessel due to operational activities or casualties. Where required, each of our vessels has an approved response plan.
The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in navigable waters and imposes liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. It also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under the more recently enacted OPA 90 and CERCLA, discussed above. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) regulates the discharge of ballast water and other substances under the CWA. EPA regulations require vessels 79 feet in length or longer (other than commercial fishing vessels) to obtain coverage under a Vessel General Permit (“VGP”) authorizing discharges of ballast waters and other wastewaters incidental to the operation of vessels when operating within the three-mile territorial waters or inland waters of the United States. The VGP requires vessel owners and operators to comply with a range of best management practices and reporting and other requirements for a number of incidental discharge types. The most recent VGP, which became effective in December 2013, expired in December 2018. It contained stringent requirements, including numeric ballast water discharge limits (that generally align with the most recent U.S. Coast Guard standards issued in 2012), to ensure that the ballast water treatment systems are functioning correctly and more stringent effluent limits for oil to sea interfaces and exhaust gas scrubber wastewater. The Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”) enacted December 4, 2018, required the EPA and Coast Guard to develop new performance standards and enforcement regulations and extends the 2013 VGP provisions until new regulations are final and enforceable. On October 9, 2024, the EPA issued Vessel Incidental Discharge National Standards of Performance, new final regulations pursuant to VIDA which set discharge standards that are as least as stringent as the VGP. These new standards are enforceable through U.S. Coast Guard regulations, which must be promulgated within two years. Until the Coast Guard’s regulations are final and enforceable, vessels will continue to be subject to the existing discharge requirements under the VGP. On December 2, 2016, the Marine Safety Center announced the approval of the first Coast Guard type approved Ballast Water Management System (“BWMS”). Since the approved BWMS became available, vessels calling at U.S. ports have been required to have such systems installed by their first regular dry-docking after January 1, 2016. Vessel owners and operators are alternatively permitted to meet the discharge standard without the use of a BWMS or, apply for an individual, justified extension to the compliance date. We comply with the most recent version of the VGP for all of our vessels that operate in U.S. waters or have received permission from the Coast Guard to perform ballast exchange operations in U.S. waters for a maximum of five years after the compliance date for each vessel. We do not believe that any costs associated with meeting the requirements under the VGP or the Vessel Incidental Discharge National Standards of Performance will be material.
U.S. Coast Guard regulations adopted under the 1996 U.S. National Invasive Species Act (“NISA”) also impose mandatory ballast water management practices for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks entering or operating in U.S. waters. Amendments to these regulations, which became effective in June 2012, established maximum acceptable discharge limits for various invasive species and/or requirements for active treatment of ballast water. The U.S. Coast Guard ballast water standards are consistent with requirements under the BWM Convention. Several states, including Michigan and California, have adopted legislation or regulations relating to the permitting and management of ballast water discharges. California has extended its ballast water management program to the regulation of “hull fouling” organisms that attach to vessels and adopted regulations limiting the number of organisms in ballast water discharges. Other states could adopt similar requirements that could increase the costs of operation in state waters.
The EPA has adopted standards under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) that pertain to emissions from vessel vapor control and recovery and other operations in regulated port areas and emissions from the large marine diesel engines from model year 2004 or later. Several states also regulate emissions from vapor control and recovery under authority of State Implementation Plans adopted under the CAA. In April 2010, the EPA promulgated regulations that impose more stringent standards for emissions of particulate matter, sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides from new Category 3 marine diesel engines on vessels constructed on or after January 1, 2016 and registered or flagged in the U.S. and implement the new MARPOL Annex VI requirements for U.S. and foreign flagged ships entering U.S. ports or operating in U.S. internal waters. California has adopted emission limits for diesel engines of ocean-going vessels operating within 24 miles of the California coast and requires operators to use low sulphur content fuel. California has also mandated that ships, instead of relying on their shipboard power, must use shore power while berthed through a process known as Cold Ironing or Alternative Maritime Power or use other CAECS (CARB Approved Emission Control Strategies) such as emission capture systems. The regulation was phased in starting in 2014 and the compliance start date for containerships, refrigerated cargo vessels and passenger vessel began on January 1, 2023. Our vessels currently affected by California regulations have made the necessary modifications. If this regulation is extended to dry bulk vessels, we will have to make necessary modifications to our vessels. It is expected that the cost of modifications needed for other vessels in our fleet that may call to California in the future will be borne in part by the charterers of each vessel, but it is difficult to predict the exact impact on our operations.
If new or more stringent regulations relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by ocean-going vessels are adopted by the EPA or states, these requirements could require significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.
European Union Requirements
The European Union has adopted legislation that (1) requires member states to refuse access to their ports to certain substandard vessels, according to vessel type, flag and number of previous detentions; (2) obliges member states to inspect at least 25% of foreign vessels using their ports annually and provides for increased surveillance of vessels posing a high risk to maritime safety or the marine environment; (3) provides the European Union with greater authority and control over classification societies, including the ability to seek to suspend or revoke the authority of negligent societies and (4) requires member states to impose criminal sanctions for certain pollution events, such as the unauthorized discharge of tank washings.
The European Union has also adopted Regulation (EU) No. 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 2013 on ship recycling in alignment with the requirements of the 2009 Hong Kong Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships (the “EU Recycling Regulation”). Since December 31, 2018, seagoing vessels flying the flag of an EU Member State must be recycled solely in ship recycling facilities within the EU or in countries which comply with a number of safety and environmental requirements and are included in the European List of ship recycling facilities published by the European Commission. In addition, all ships calling to European ports, whether flying the flag of an EU Member State or not, must have an inventory of hazardous materials on board, such as asbestos and ozone-depleting substances, that specifies the location and approximate quantities of those materials certified by the relevant administration or authority.
The European Union has also adopted Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 29, 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport (the “EU MRV Regulation”) and Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of September 13, 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport (the “FuelEU Maritime Regulation”). The EU MRV Regulation requires large vessels entering European Union ports to monitor, report and verify their carbon dioxide emissions. Since June 2019, all vessels calling to ports in the European Union must carry onboard a document of compliance with said requirements. Data collected is open to the public, as provided for by the regulations. The provisions of the EU MRV Regulation are similar to MARPOL Annex VI which were adopted by IMO in October 2016.
On September 16, 2020, the European Parliament voted in favor of amending the EU MRV Regulation to require shipping companies to reduce on a linear basis their annual average CO2 emissions relative to transport work for all their ships by at least 40% by 2030, with penalties for non-compliance. In May 2023, EU ETS regulations were amended in order to include emissions from maritime transport activities in the EU ETS and to require the monitoring, reporting and verification of emissions of additional greenhouse gases and emissions from additional ship types. In January 2024, the EU ETS was extended to cover CO2 emissions from all large ships (of 5,000 gross tonnage and above) entering EU ports, and will apply to methane and nitrous oxide emissions beginning in 2026. Shipping companies will need to buy allowances that correspond to the emissions covered by the system. Additional jurisdictions may adopt similar GHG emissions monitoring and reduction schemes in the future.
The incorporation of shipping into the EU ETS introduced an additional approximately 80 to 100 million emission allowances to the market. Of these, auction revenues from 20 million emission allowances will go to the Innovation Fund, a funding program that develops low-carbon technologies, to be used for shipping-specific projects. The remaining revenues will go to the EU Member States and must be used for climate-related purposes.
While the inclusion of shipping in the EU ETS formalized a market-based GHG emissions reduction measure that promotes improvements in energy efficiency, European regulators recognized that a mechanism establishing increasing levels of demand for renewable and low-carbon maritime fuels would drive additional emissions reductions. As a result, the EU adopted the FuelEU Maritime Regulation on July 25, 2023, which was designed to enable the EU to reduce its net GHG emissions by at least 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels and to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. The FuelEU Maritime Regulation incentivizes the production and uptake of sustainable low carbon and renewable fuels for ships over 5,000 gt operating in European territorial waters. The regulation entered into force on January 1, 2025 and established uniform rules imposing a limit on the GHG intensity of the energy used onboard ships arriving at, staying within or departing from ports under the jurisdiction of an EEA country. It also established that from January 1, 2030, containerships and passenger ships will be required to connect to onshore power supply (OPS) or use zero-emission technology while at berth in a port of call under the jurisdiction of a member state. The GHG intensity of energy consumed by vessels on European voyages is measured on a Well-to-Wake (WtW) basis, and the Regulation requires reductions in the lifecycle GHG intensity of fuel which will gradually increase over time, beginning with a 2% reduction in 2025, up to 80% by 2050. This progressive reduction is designed to incentivize the development and uptake of biofuels and renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs) with higher decarbonization potential. The upper limit of GHG intensity is calculated based on the EU MRV data from 2020, and ships with a higher GHG intensity than the applicable upper limit must pay a remedial penalty proportional to their compliance deficit. The compliance deficit is the difference between the maximum permissible GHG intensity and the actual GHG intensity, multiplied by the ship’s energy consumption. FuelEU also includes a voluntary pooling mechanism, under which ships will be allowed to pool their compliance balance with one or more other ships.
Both the EU ETS and FuelEU schemes have significant impacts on the management of the vessels calling to EU ports, by increasing the complexity and monitoring of, and costs associated with the operation of vessels and affecting the relationships with our time charterers. Ultimately, vessels chartered in the future may be subject to discount rates compared to more technologically advanced vessels that are better equipped to comply with such schemes, such as vessels using dual fuels.
Marshall Islands Requirements
On January 1, 2019, the Economic Substance Regulations, 2018 (the “ESRs”) adopted by the Republic of the Marshall Islands came into force.
The ESRs apply to all Marshall Islands non-resident domestic entities and foreign maritime entities registered in the Marshall Islands that meet the definition of “relevant entity” and which derive income from a “relevant activity.” “Relevant entity” is defined in the ESRs to include a non-resident domestic entity or foreign maritime entity formed under Marshall Islands law that is centrally managed and controlled outside the Marshall Islands and is a tax resident of a jurisdiction other than the Marshall Islands. “Relevant activity” is limited under the ESRs to certain enumerated activities including “shipping business” and “holding company business” which the Company has determined may be applicable to it and its Marshall Islands subsidiaries and affiliates.
Under the ESRs, for each yearly reporting period, a relevant entity that derives income from a relevant activity must satisfy an economic substance test whereby the entity must show that it (i) is directed and managed in the Marshall Islands in relation to that relevant activity, (ii) carries out core income-generating activity in relation to that relevant activity in the Marshall Islands (although it is understood and acknowledged by the regulators that income-generated activities for shipping companies will generally occur in international waters) and (iii) has (a) an adequate amount of expenditures in the Marshall Islands, (b) adequate physical presence in the Marshall Islands and (c) an adequate number of qualified employees in the Marshall Islands, considering the level of relevant activity carried out in the Marshall Islands.
All Marshall Islands non-resident domestic entities and foreign maritime entities are required to submit an Economic Substance Declaration to the Registrar of Corporations (the “Registrar”) on a yearly basis. If the Registrar determines that a relevant entity has not met the economic substance test for the relevant reporting period, the Registrar will issue a notice of non-compliance and assess penalties as disclosed in the notice. Penalties can range from fines up to $100,000 and/or revocation of formation documents and dissolution.
Other Regional Requirements
The environmental protection regimes in certain other countries, such as Canada, resemble those of the United States. To the extent we operate in the territorial waters of such countries or enter their ports, our containerships would typically be subject to the requirements and liabilities imposed in such countries. Other regions of the world also have the ability to adopt requirements or regulations that may impose additional obligations on our containerships and may entail significant expenditures on our part and may increase the costs of our operations. These requirements, however, would apply to the industry operating in those regions as a whole and would also affect our competitors.
Of particular importance, due to the trade intensity in these areas, are four ECAs created in Hong Kong and in China (Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta and Bohai Sea), which are regulated in order to reduce the levels of ship-generated air pollution and restrict the sulphur content of fuels. As of January 1, 2017, vessels at berth in a core port within an emission control area are required to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5% m/m—except one hour after arrival and one hour before departure. Since January 1, 2018, all ports within Chinese emission control areas have implemented this standard. As of January 1, 2019, vessels must use fuel with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.5% m/m prior to entering China’s territorial sea, in defined areas. Vessels capable of receiving shore power must use shore power if they berth for more than three hours in ports in the coastal ECA that have shore power capabilities (or more than two hours in ports with such capabilities in the inland ECAs). Furthermore, ships of 400 gross tonnage or over, or ships powered by main propulsion machinery greater than 750 kW of propulsion power, calling at a port in China must report energy consumption data of their last voyage to China MSA before leaving port (China Regulation on Data Collection for Energy Consumption of Ships). Hong Kong’s current Fuel at Berth Regulation requiring ships to burn fuel with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.5% m/m while at berth is expected to be replaced by a regulation extending the standard to ships operating in Hong Kong waters. Ships not equipped with scrubbers will be required to burn fuel with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.5% m/m within Hong Kong waters, irrespective of whether they are sailing or at berth.
In Taiwan, ships not equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers must burn fuel with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.5% m/m when entering its international commercial port areas.
In connection with the introduction of the ban of high sulphur fuel for vessels not equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers, countries are introducing rules as to the type of exhaust gas scrubber that may be acceptable to be operated on vessels, in effect prohibiting the operation in their waters of open loop-type exhaust gas scrubbers and forcing vessels to use the more expensive Diesel Oil fuel when sailing in their waters.
Vessel Security Regulations
A number of initiatives have been introduced in recent years intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (the “MTSA”) was signed into law. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations in July 2003 requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. This new chapter came into effect in July 2004 and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created ISPS Code. Among the various requirements are:
| • | on-board installation of automatic information systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications; |
| • | on-board installation of ship security alert systems; |
| • | the development of ship security plans; and |
| • | compliance with flag state security certification requirements. |
The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures; provided such vessels have on board a valid “International Ship Security Certificate” that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. We have implemented the various security measures required by the IMO, SOLAS and the ISPS Code and have approved ISPS certificates and plans certified by the applicable flag state on board all our vessels.
C. | Organizational Structure |
Costamare Inc. is a holding company incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands which, as of February 12, 2025, has 146 wholly-owned subsidiaries incorporated in the Republic of Liberia and 15 wholly-owned subsidiaries incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. As of that date, 94 of our Liberian subsidiaries own dry bulk or container vessels in the water, eight are engaged in arbitration related to the terminations of shipbuilding contracts due to default by the shipyard and the remaining subsidiaries are inactive. Of our Marshall Islands subsidiaries, 12 own container vessels in the water and the remaining subsidiaries are inactive. In addition, as of February 12, 2025, Costamare had one majority-owned subsidiary incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands which holds our participation in the dry bulk operating platform and controlled one company incorporated under the laws of Jersey, which has 35 subsidiaries incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and two incorporated in the Republic of Liberia. A list of our subsidiaries as of February 12, 2025 is set forth in Exhibit 8.1 to this annual report.
D. | Property, Plant and Equipment |
We have no freehold or material leasehold interest in any real property. We occupy office space at 7 rue du Gabian, MC 98000 Monaco. Other than our vessels, we do not have any material property. Our vessels are subject to priority mortgages, which secure our obligations under our various credit facilities. For further details regarding our credit facilities, refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
ITEM 4A. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
ITEM 5. | OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this annual report. This discussion includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Please see the section “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this annual report.
Overview
We are an international owner and operator of containerships and dry bulk vessels. We charter our vessels to many of the world’s largest liner companies, providing worldwide transportation of containerized cargoes. We charter our dry bulk vessels to a wide variety of customers, providing worldwide transportation for and dry bulk cargoes.
As of February 12, 2025, our containership fleet consisted of 68 vessels in the water, aggregating approximately 513,000 TEU, making us one of the largest public containership companies in the world based on total TEU capacity. Additionally, as of the same date, our dry bulk fleet consisted of 38 vessels with a total capacity of approximately 3,017,000 dwt, including one vessel that we have agreed to sell, with a capacity of approximately 76,600 dwt. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”.
As regards our containership business, our strategy is to deploy our containerships on long-term, fixed-rate time charters to take advantage of the stable cash flows and high utilization rates typically associated with long-term time charters. Time chartered containerships are generally employed on long-term charters to liner companies that charter-in vessels on a long-term basis as part of their business strategies. As of February 12, 2025, the average (weighted by TEU capacity) remaining time charter duration for our fleet of 68 containerships in the water was approximately 3.4 years, based on the remaining fixed terms and assuming the exercise of any owner’s options and the non-exercise of any charterer’s options under our containerships’ charters. As of February 12, 2025, our fixed-term charters for our fleet of 68 containerships in the water represented an aggregate of approximately $2.4 billion of contracted revenue, assuming the earliest redelivery dates possible and 365 revenue days per annum per containership. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”.
As regards our dry bulk business, our current chartering policy is to employ our vessels primarily on short-term time charters, which provides us the flexibility to capitalize on any favorable changes in the dry bulk charter rate environment. Based on market conditions, we may employ our vessels with a mix of short-, medium- and long-term time charters and voyage charters. For the year ended December 31, 2024, our dry bulk fleet utilization level was 98.9%. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”.
The table below provides additional information about the charter coverage for our fleet of containerships and dry bulk vessels as of December 31, 2024. Except as indicated in the footnotes, it does not reflect events occurring after that date, including any charter contract we entered into after that date. The table assumes the earliest redelivery dates possible under our vessels’ charters. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No. of Vessels whose Charters Expire(1)(2) | | | 36 | | | | 24 | | | | 9 | | | | 18 | | | | 4 | | | | 10 | | | | 5 | |
No. of Containerships whose Charters Expire | | | 4 | | | | 18 | | | | 9 | | | | 18 | | | | 4 | | | | 10 | | | | 5 | |
No. of Dry Bulk Vessels whose Charters Expire(1)(2) | | | 32 | | | | 6 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
TEU of Expiring Containership Charters | | | 18,935 | | | | 139,270 | | | | 42,438 | | | | 114,105 | | | | 35,588 | | | | 105,905 | | | | 56,730 | |
DWT of Expiring Dry Bulk Vessel Charters | | | 2,151,027 | | | | 865,828 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Contracted Days | | | 28,649 | | | | 21,178 | | | | 14,493 | | | | 10,134 | | | | 5,949 | | | | 3,511 | | | | 745 | |
Available Days | | | 10,041 | | | | 17,512 | | | | 24,197 | | | | 28,166 | | | | 31,646 | | | | 33,869 | | | | 136,616 | |
Contracted/Total Days | | | 74.0% |
| | | 54.7% |
| | | 37.5% |
| | | 26.5% |
| | | 15.8% |
| | | 9.4% |
| | | 0.5% |
|
Containership Contracted/Total Containership Days (TEU -adjusted)(3) | | | 98.6% |
| | | 80.4% |
| | | 62.9% |
| | | 50.5% |
| | | 35.7% |
| | | 21.9% |
| | | 1.3% |
|
Dry Bulk Vessel Contracted/Total Dry Bulk Vessel Days (dwt-adjusted) (4) | | | 48.9% |
| | | 26.9% |
| | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
(1) | Includes one dry bulk vessel with no employment as at December 31, 2024. |
(2) | Total days are calculated on the assumption that the vessels will continue trading until the age of 30 years old for containerships and 25 years for dry bulk vessels, unless the containership will exceed 30 years of age or the dry bulk vessel will exceed 25 years of age at the expiry of its current time charter, in which case we assume that the vessel continues trading until that expiry date. |
(3) | Contracted Days coverage for containerships adjusted by TEU capacity. |
(4) | Contracted Days coverage for dry bulk vessels adjusted by dwt capacity. |
Our containership fleet is currently under time charters with eleven different charterers. For the three years ended December 31, 2024, our largest customers by revenue were A.P. Moller-Maersk, MSC, Evergreen, Hapag Lloyd, ZIM and COSCO. Chartering in the dry bulk sector tends to be more diversified with significant turnover among our charterers. Our dry bulk fleet is currently under charters with more than 20 different charterers.
We dry-dock our vessels when the next survey (dry-dock survey or special survey) is scheduled to become due, every 30 months for dry bulk vessels of 15 years of age or over and every 60 months for other vessels. We have dry-docked 63 vessels over the past three years, including three Joint Venture vessels, and we plan to dry-dock 26 vessels in 2025 and 27 vessels in 2026. Information about our fleet dry-docking schedule through 2029 is set forth in a table in “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance—Inspection by Classification Societies”.
As of February 12, 2025, the dry bulk operating platform has chartered-in for a period, 50 vessels with a total carrying capacity of approximately 7,997,000 dwt, all of which have already been delivered and subsequently are or will be employed under voyage charters or sub time charters. Moreover, the dry bulk operating platform has contracted to charter-in two vessels, which are currently under construction, once they are delivered to their third-party owners.
As of February 12, 2025, Neptune is funding or committed to funding 37 shipping assets, and Neptune’s portfolio of sale and leaseback arrangements and commitments includes 19 dry bulk vessels, three tanker vessels and 15 offshore vessels.
Our Managers and Service Providers
Costamare Shipping provides us with commercial, technical and other services pursuant to the Framework Agreement. As of February 12, 2025, Costamare Shipping, itself or together with our sub-managers, V.Ships Greece, Navilands, Navilands (Shanghai), Vinnen, HanseContor, and FML, provides our fleet with technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase, accounting and insurance services pursuant to separate ship-management agreements between each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries and Costamare Shipping and, in certain cases, the relevant sub-manager. V.Ships Greece will at our direction subcontract certain services to and enter into a relevant sub-management agreement with V.Ships Shanghai. Navilands may subcontract certain services to and enter into a relevant sub-management agreement with Navilands (Shanghai). Costamare Services provides our vessel-owning subsidiaries with chartering, sale and purchase, insurance and certain representation and administrative services pursuant to the Services Agreement. In the event that Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services decide to delegate certain or all of the services they have agreed to perform under the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement, respectively, either through (i) subcontracting to a sub-manager or sub-provider or (ii) by directing such sub-manager or sub-provider to enter into a direct agreement with the relevant vessel-owning subsidiary, then, in the case of subcontracting under (i), Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, will be responsible for paying the fee charged by the relevant sub-manager or sub-provider for providing such services and, in the case of a direct agreement under (ii), the fee received by Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, will be reduced by the fee payable to the sub-manager or sub-provider under the relevant direct agreement. As a result, these arrangements will not result in any increase in the aggregate management fees and services fees that we pay. In addition to management fees, we pay for any capital expenditures, financial costs, operating expenses and any general and administrative expenses, including payments to third parties, including specialist providers, in accordance with the Framework Agreement and the relevant separate ship-management agreements or supervision agreements. Our chairman and chief executive officer and our chief financial officer supervise, in conjunction with our board of directors, the services provided by Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services.
Costamare Shipping received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of $1,020 per day pro-rated for the calendar days we own each vessel. This fee is reduced to $510 per day in the case of any vessel subject to a bareboat charter. We also pay Costamare Shipping a flat fee of $839,988 per newbuild vessel for the supervision of the construction of any newbuild vessel that we may contract. Costamare Shipping received in 2024 and 2023, a fee of 0.15% on all gross freight, demurrage, charter hire and ballast bonus or other income earned with respect to each vessel in our fleet. Costamare Services received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of 1.10%, on all gross freight, demurrage, charter hire and ballast bonus or other income earned with respect to each vessel in our fleet and a quarterly fee of (i) $666,737 and (ii) an amount equal to the value of 149,600 shares, based on the average closing price of our common stock on the NYSE for the 10 days ending on the 30th day of the last month of each quarter; provided that Costamare Services may elect to receive 149,600 shares instead of the fee under (ii). We have reserved a number of shares of common stock to cover the fees to be paid to Costamare Services under (ii) through December 31, 2025. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services charged aggregate fees of $64.6 million and $63.7 million, respectively, including $10.5 million and $14.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, charged by third-party managers. The aforementioned fees include the value of the 598,400 shares we issued within each year pursuant to the Services Agreement, to Costamare Services.
On December 31, 2024, the terms of the Framework Agreement and the Services Agreement automatically renewed for another one-year period, and will automatically renew for ten more consecutive one-year periods until December 31, 2035, at which point the Framework Agreement and the Services Agreement will expire. The daily fee for each vessel, the supervision fee in respect of each vessel under construction payable to Costamare Shipping under the Framework Agreement and the quarterly fee payable to Costamare Services under the Services Agreement (other than the portion of the fee in clause (ii) above which is calculated on the basis of our share price) will be annually adjusted to reflect any strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar of more than 5% per year and/or material unforeseen cost increases. We are able to terminate the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement, subject to a termination fee, by providing written notice to Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, at least 12 months before the end of the subsequent one-year term. The termination fee is equal to (a) the number of full years remaining prior to December 31, 2035, times (b) the aggregate fees due and payable to Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, during the 12-month period ending on the date of termination (without taking into account any reduction in fees under the Framework Agreement to reflect that certain obligations have been delegated to a sub-manager or a sub-provider, as applicable); provided that the termination fee will always be at least two times the aggregate fees over the 12-month period described above. Information about other termination events under the Management Agreements is set forth in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management Agreements—Term and Termination Rights”.
Pursuant to the terms of the Framework Agreement, the separate ship-management agreements, the supervision agreements and the Services Agreement, liability of Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services to us is limited to instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services. Further, we are required to indemnify Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services for liabilities incurred by them in performance of the Framework Agreement, separate ship-management agreements, supervision agreements and the Services Agreement respectively, in each case except in instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services.
Costamare Shipping provided management services to the Joint Venture vessels under separate management agreements with each Joint Venture entity pursuant to which Costamare Shipping provided technical, crew, crew insurance, commercial, general and administrative and insurance services directly or together with V.Ships Greece directly or, upon being directed to do so by the relevant Joint Venture entity through V.Ships Shanghai.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, Costamare Shipping charged, in aggregate, to the vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, $1.7 million for services provided in accordance with the relevant agreements, including $0.8 million charged by third-party managers.
Furthermore, during the year ended December 31, 2023, Costamare Shipping charged, in aggregate, to the companies established pursuant to the Framework Deed and to the vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, $3.0 million, for services provided in accordance with the relevant agreements, including $0.9 million charged by third-party managers.
Blue Net provides exclusive charter brokerage services to containership owners. Under the Brokerage Agreement, as amended on January 2, 2020, each vessel-owning subsidiary paid a fee of €9,413 for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024 in respect of its vessel, prorated for the calendar days of ownership (including as disponent owner under a bareboat charter agreement). In lieu of said annual fee, in certain cases, some of our vessels have agreed to pay a commission ranging from 0.5 to 1.25% of their revenues from the charter arranged by Blue Net or Blue Net Asia. During the year ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024 we paid $700,835 and $721,931, respectively, in total to Blue Net and $691,575 and $740,939, respectively, in total to Blue Net Asia for charter brokerage services.
Costamare Bulkers appointed Local Agency A, Local Agency B and Local Agency C on November 14, 2022, and Local Agency D on November 20, 2023, as service providers on an exclusive basis to provide chartering and other services on a cost basis (including all expenses related to the provision of the services) plus a mark-up (currently set at 11%), with the Agency Agreements to continue until terminated by either party. On December 16, 2024, the Agency Agreements were most recently amended and restated such that each Local Agency can now provide its services to any dry bulk subsidiary of the Company, in addition to CBI. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024 the Agency Companies charged Costamare Bulkers for services provided, in the aggregate, $11.7 million and $15.7 million, respectively.
Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
Our financial results are largely driven by the following factors:
| • | Number of Vessels in Our Fleet. The number of vessels in our fleet is a key factor in determining the level of our revenues. Aggregate expenses also increase as the size of our fleet increases. Vessel acquisitions and dispositions give rise to gains and losses and other one-time items. Average number of vessels is the number of vessels that constituted our fleet for the relevant period, as measured by the sum of the ownership days each vessel was part of our fleet during the period divided by the number of calendar days in that period. As of February 12, 2025, our containership fleet amounted to a total of 68 vessels and our dry bulk fleet amount to a total of 38. |
| • | Charter Rates. The charter rates we obtain for our vessels also drive our revenues. Charter rates are based primarily on demand and supply of vessel capacity at the time we enter into the charters for our vessels. Demand and supply can fluctuate significantly over time as a result of changing economic conditions affecting trade flow between ports and the industries which use our shipping services. Vessels operated under long-term charters are less susceptible to cyclical containership charter rates than vessels operated on shorter-term charters, such as spot charters. We are exposed to varying charter rate environments when our chartering arrangements expire and we seek to deploy our vessels under new charters. As illustrated in the table above under “—Overview”, we aim to reduce our exposure to any one particular rate environment and point in the shipping cycle on the containership sector by staggering the maturities of our vessels’ charters, while in the dry bulk sector we operate our vessels primarily on short term time charters, index-linked time charters, or voyage charters. See “—Voyage Revenue”. |
| • | Utilization of Our Fleet. We calculate utilization of our fleet by dividing the number of days during which our vessels are employed less the aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to any reason other than due to scheduled repairs or repairs under guarantee, vessel upgrades or special surveys by the number of days during which our vessels are employed. We use fleet utilization to measure our vessels’ condition and efficiency in servicing our clients whilst employed. Historically, our fleet has had a limited number of unscheduled off-hire days during the period of employment. In 2022, 2023 and 2024 our fleet utilization for each year was 98.4%, 98.9% and 99.5%, respectively. More specifically, in 2024 our containerships fleet utilization rate was 99.8% and our dry bulk fleet utilization rate was 98.9%. If the utilization pattern of our fleet changes, our financial results would be affected. |
| • | Expenses and Other Costs. Our ability to control our fixed and variable expenses is critical to our ability to maintain acceptable profit margins. These expenses include commission expenses, crew wages and related costs, the cost of insurance and vessel registry, expenses for repairs and maintenance, the cost of spares and consumable stores, lubricating oil costs, tonnage taxes, regulatory fees, vessel scrubbers and Ballast Water Treatment System (“BWTS”) maintenance expenses and other miscellaneous expenses. Furthermore, such expenses include the cost of chartering-in vessels by CBI along with the associated voyage expenses for such vessels which are subsequently employed under voyage charters. In addition, factors beyond our control, such as developments relating to market premiums for insurance and the value of the U.S. dollar compared to currencies in which certain of our expenses, primarily crew wages, are paid, can cause our vessel operating expenses to increase. We proactively manage our foreign currency exposure by entering into Euro/dollar forward contracts in an effort to minimize volatility in Euro denominated expenses. |
| • | Financing Expenses. We rely on external financing mainly from banks and other financing institutions, which we primarily use for the acquisition of vessels and refinancing of maturing financing facilities. We proactively seek to hedge the associated interest rate exposure, subject to market conditions, in an effort to minimize the embedded volatility in interest rate expenses. |
The following table presents selected consolidated financial and other data of Costamare for each of the five years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2024. The table should be read together with the additional information provided in this section. The selected consolidated financial data of Costamare is a summary of and is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). Our audited consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024 and the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2023 and 2024, together with the notes thereto, are included in “Item 18. Financial Statements” and should be read in their entirety.
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for share and per share data) | |
STATEMENT OF INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Voyage revenue | | $ | 460,319 | | | $ | 793,639 | | | $ | 1,113,859 | | | $ | 1,502,491 | | | $ | 1,849,860 | |
Voyage revenue-related parties | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 210,087 | |
Total voyage revenue | | | 460,319 | | | | 793,639 | | | | 1,113,859 | | | | 1,502,491 | | | | 2,059,947 | |
Income from investments in leaseback vessels | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,915 | | | | 23,947 | |
Total revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Voyage expenses | | | 7,372 | | | | 13,311 | | | | 49,069 | | | | 275,856 | | | | 371,058 | |
Charter-in hire expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 340,926 | | | | 706,569 | |
Voyage expenses-related parties | | | 6,516 | | | | 11,089 | | | | 15,418 | | | | 13,993 | | | | 21,566 | |
Vessels’ operating expenses | | | 117,054 | | | | 179,981 | | | | 269,231 | | | | 258,088 | | | | 240,207 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 7,360 | | | | 9,405 | | | | 12,440 | | | | 18,366 | | | | 25,040 | |
General and administrative expenses-non-cash component | | | 3,655 | | | | 7,414 | | | | 7,089 | | | | 5,850 | | | | 8,427 | |
Management and agency fees-related parties | | | 21,616 | | | | 29,621 | | | | 46,735 | | | | 56,254 | | | | 59,281 | |
Amortization of dry-docking and special survey costs | | | 9,056 | | | | 10,433 | | | | 13,486 | | | | 19,782 | | | | 23,627 | |
Depreciation | | | 108,700 | | | | 136,958 | | | | 165,998 | | | | 166,340 | | | | 164,206 | |
(Gain) / loss on sale of vessels, net | | | 79,120 | | | | (45,894 | ) | | | (126,336 | ) | | | (112,220 | ) | | | (3,788 | ) |
Loss on vessel held for sale | | | 7,665 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,305 | | | | — | |
Vessels’ impairment loss | | | 31,577 | | | | — | | | | 1,691 | | | | 434 | | | | — | |
Foreign exchange (gains) / losses, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | $ | 60,328 | | | $ | 441,350 | | | $ | 662,246 | | | $ | 468,008 | | | $
| 462,261 | |
Interest income | | $ | 1,827 | | | $ | 1,587 | | | $ | 5,956 | | | $ | 32,447 | | | $
| 33,185 | |
Interest and finance costs | | | (68,702 | ) | | | (86,047 | ) | | | (122,233 | ) | | | (144,429 | ) | | | (133,123 | ) |
Swaps breakage cost | | | (6 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Equity gain on investments | | | 16,195 | | | | 12,859 | | | | 2,296 | | | | 764 | | | | 12 | |
Gain on sale of equity securities | | | — | | | | 60,161 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Dividend income from investment in equity securities | | | — | | | | 1,833 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Other, net | | | 1,181 | | | | 4,624 | | | | 3,729 | | | | 6,941 | | | | 2,873 | |
Gain / (loss) on derivative instruments, net | | | (1,946 | ) | | | (1,246 | ) | | | 2,698 | | | | 17,288 | | | | (48,874 | ) |
Total other expenses, net | | $ | (51,451 | ) | | $ | (6,229 | ) | | $ | (107,554 | ) | | $ | (86,989 | ) | | $
| (145,927 | ) |
Net Income | | $ | 8,877 | | | $ | 435,121 | | | $ | 554,692 | | | $ | 381,019 | | | $ | 316,334 | |
Earnings allocated to Preferred Stock | | $ | (31,082 | ) | | $ | (31,068 | ) | | $ | (31,068 | ) | | $ | (31,068 | ) | | $ | (23,796 | ) |
Deemed dividend in redemption of Series E Preferred Stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,446 | ) |
Gain on retirement of Preferred Stock | | | 619 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | 263 | | | | 4,730 | | | | 3,585 | |
Net income / (loss) available to Common Stockholders | | $ | (21,586 | ) | | $ | 404,053 | | | $ | 523,887 | | | $ | 354,681 | | | $ | 290,677 | |
Earnings / (loss) per common share, basic and diluted | | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 3.28 | | | $ | 4.26 | | | $ | 2.95 | | | $ | 2.44 | |
Weighted average number of shares, basic and diluted | | | 120,696,130 | | | | 123,070,730 | | | | 122,964,358 | | | | 120,299,172 | | | | 119,299,405 | |
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 274,284 | | | $ | 466,494 | | | $ | 581,593 | | | $ | 331,368 | | | $ | 537,716 | |
Net cash provided by / (used in) investing activities | | | (36,397 | ) | | | (787,456 | ) | | | 42,488 | | | | 79,093 | | | | (79,507 | ) |
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities | | | (241,862 | ) | | | 482,594 | | | | (166,051 | ) | | | (396,815 | ) | | | (505,477 | ) |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | | | (3,975 | ) | | | 161,632 | | | | 458,030 | | | | 13,646 | | | | (47,268 | ) |
Dividends paid | | | (65,470 | ) | | | (71,263 | ) | | | (119,548 | ) | | | (71,867 | ) | | | (74,147 | ) |
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at year end) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | $ | 192,050 | | | $ | 426,124 | | | $ | 1,014,622 | | | $ | 1,117,661 | | | $ | 1,040,216 | |
Total assets | | | 3,010,516 | | | | 4,407,041 | | | | 4,896,229 | | | | 5,287,022 | | | | 5,148,687 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 206,974 | | | | 370,027 | | | | 423,090 | | | | 662,770 | | | | 745,560 | |
Total long-term debt and finance lease liability, including current portion | | | 1,465,619 | | | | 2,467,321 | | | | 2,607,534 | | | | 2,391,644 | | | | 2,072,364 | |
Temporary equity – Redeemable non-controlling interest in subsidiary | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,487 | | | | 629 | | | | (2,453 | ) |
Common stock | | | 12 | | | | 12 | | | | 12 | | | | 13 | | | | 13 | |
Total stockholders’ equity/net assets | | | 1,348,820 | | | | 1,725,899 | | | | 2,156,950 | | | | 2,438,760 | | | | 2,571,059 | |
| | Average for the Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FLEET DATA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of vessels | | | 60.0 | | | | 83.6 | | | | 116.7 | | | | 111.4 | | | | 105.6 | |
TEU capacity (of our containerships) | | | 417,980 | | | | 521,389 | | | | 542,264 | | | | 514,978 | | | | 512,989 | |
DWT capacity (of our dry bulk vessels)* | | | — | | | | 1,252,917 | | | | 2,442,106 | | | | 2,508,358 | | | | 2,716,305 | |
* | Average dwt capacity for the year ended December 31, 2021 was calculated based on 201 days (the period from June 14, 2021 to December 31, 2021), given that we did not own any dry bulk vessels prior to June 14, 2021. |
Voyage Revenue
Voyage revenues are primarily generated from time charter or voyage charter agreements. Voyage revenues are driven primarily by the number of owned and chartered-in vessels in our fleet, the amount of daily charter hire or freight rates that our owned and chartered-in vessels earn under time or voyage charter agreements and the number of operating days during which our owned and chartered-in vessels generate revenues. These factors are, in turn, affected by our decisions relating to vessel acquisitions and dispositions, the number of vessels that we charter-in, the amount of time that we spend positioning the vessels, the amount of time that the vessels spend dry-docked undergoing repairs, maintenance and upgrade work, the age, condition and specifications of the vessels and the levels of supply and demand in the containership and dry bulk charter markets.
Under a time charter agreement, the charterer pays a fixed charter hire rate or an index-linked charter hire rate (which is adjusted periodically based on a specific index such as the Baltic Exchange Handysize Index (“BHSI”)) for the use of the vessel. Under time charter agreements, voyage revenues are recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of each time charter (excluding the effect of any options to extend the term). Furthermore, voyage revenues derived from time charter agreements with variable charter rates are accounted for as operating leases and thus are recognized on a straight-line basis as the average voyage revenue over the rental periods of such agreements, as service is performed, by dividing (i) the aggregate contracted voyage revenues until the earliest expiration date of the time charter, by (ii) the total contracted days until the earliest expiration date of the time charter agreement. Under a time charter agreement, the shipowner assumes all vessel operating costs and the charterer assumes all vessel voyage expenses.
Under a voyage charter agreement, a vessel is provided to a charterer for the transportation of specific goods between specific ports in return for payment of an agreed upon freight per ton of cargo. We are also engaged in contracts of affreightment which are contracts for multiple voyage charter employments. Voyage revenues from voyage charters in the spot market or under contracts of affreightment are recognized ratably over time because the charterer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of our performance as we perform. Therefore, voyage revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the voyage days from the loading of cargo to its discharge. Under a voyage charter agreement, the shipowner assumes all vessel operating costs and voyage expenses.
Our voyage revenues will be affected by the acquisition and charter-in of any additional vessels in the future subject to charter agreement, as well as by the disposition of any existing vessel in our fleet. Our revenues will also be affected if any of our charterers cancel a charter agreement or if we agree to renegotiate charter terms during the term of a charter resulting in aggregate revenue reduction. Our time charter arrangements have been contracted in varying rate environments and expire at different times. Our voyage charter agreements and contracts of affreightment are concluded in the spot market.
During 2023, containership charter rates decreased by 36.3% on average due to the decrease of seaborne transported container volumes and the normalization of seaborne supply chains. During 2024, containership charter rates increased by 163% on average. The increase in charter rates was mainly attributable to a 5.4% increase in the volume of containers transported due to increased demand and a respective increase of 17.7% in TEU-miles mainly due to container vessels rerouting from the Suez Canal.
During 2023, the full removal of COVID-19 lockdown policies in China, the increased demand for thermal coal and the reduction of transit flows in the Panama Canal, among other factors, resulted in an average increase of 57% in time charter rates for Capesize, Panamax, Supramax and Handysize vessels (as measured by the BCI, BPI-82, BSI-58 and BHSI-38 Indexes, respectively). During 2024, and especially in the second half of the year, time charter rates exhibited a significant decline resulting in a decrease of 52% for the year.
Charter-in hire Expenses
Charter-in hire expenses include lease expenses which derive from our charter-in arrangements that are classified as operating leases. Lease expenses are recognized on a straight-line basis over the rental periods of each charter agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024 we chartered-in nil, 93 and 167 third-party vessels, respectively.
Voyage Expenses
Voyage expenses primarily consist of port and canal charges, bunker (fuel) expenses and commissions to counter and third parties that are unique to a particular charter. Under our time charter agreements, charterers assume the voyage expenses other than the commissions. Under our voyage charter agreements, we assume the voyage expenses other than the commissions. During 2023 and 2024, commissions charged represented 14% and 13% of voyage expenses, respectively.
These commissions do not include the fees we pay to our manager, which are described below under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreements”.
Vessels’ Operating Expenses
Vessels’ operating expenses include crew wages and related costs, the cost of insurance, expenses for repairs and maintenance, the cost of spares and consumable stores, lubricant costs, statutory and classification expenses and other miscellaneous expenses. Aggregate expenses increase as the size of our fleet increases. We expect that insurance costs, dry-docking and maintenance costs will increase as our vessels age. Factors beyond our control, some of which may affect the shipping industry in general—for instance, developments relating to market premiums for insurance and changes in the market price of lubricants due to increases in oil prices—may also cause vessel operating expenses to increase. In addition, a substantial portion of our vessel operating expenses, primarily crew wages, are in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (mainly in Euro), and any gain or loss we incur as a result of the U.S. dollar fluctuating in value against these currencies is included in vessel operating expenses. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 14% of our outstanding accounts payable were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (mainly in Euro). We fund our managers with the amounts they will need to pay our fleet’s vessel operating expenses. Under our time charter arrangements, we generally pay for vessel operating expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses mainly include legal, accounting and advisory fees. We also incur additional general and administrative expenses as a public company. The primary components of general and administrative expenses consist of the expenses associated with being a public company, which include the preparation of disclosure documents, legal and accounting costs, investor relation costs, incremental director and officer liability insurance costs, director and executive compensation and costs related to compliance with the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, and costs related to other corporate functions such as tax and internal audit.
Management and Agency Fees
Effective from January 1, 2022, the daily fee increased from $956 per day per vessel to $1,020 per vessel. The total management fees paid by us to our managers during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024 amounted to $43.9 million, $44.6 million and $43.6 million, respectively. The amounts charged by our related party managers include amounts paid to third-party managers of $10.5 million, $14.5 million and $10.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, we paid agency fees of $11.7 million, in aggregate, and $15.7 million, in aggregate, respectively, charged by the Agency Companies in connection with the operations of Costamare Bulkers. During the fourth quarter of 2022 we paid agency fees of $2.8 million, in aggregate, charged by Local Agency A, Local Agency B and Local Agency C in connection with the operations of Costamare Bulkers. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreements” for more information regarding management fees.
Amortization of Dry-docking and Special Survey Costs
All vessels are dry-docked at least once every five years for inspection of their underwater parts and for repairs related to such inspections. For dry bulk vessels that have passed their third special survey, a dry-dock is required every two and a half years thereafter. We follow the deferral method of accounting for special survey and dry-docking costs whereby actual costs incurred (mainly shipyard costs, paints and class renewal expenses) are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period through the date the next survey is scheduled to become due. If a survey is performed prior to the scheduled date, the remaining unamortized balances are immediately written off. Unamortized balances of vessels that are sold are written off and included in the calculation of the resulting gain or loss in the period of the vessel’s sale.
Depreciation
We depreciate our vessels on a straight-line basis over their estimated remaining useful economic lives. The estimated useful lives of our containerships are 30 years from their initial delivery from the shipyard. The estimated useful lives of our dry bulk vessels are 25 years from their initial delivery from the shipyard. Depreciation is based on cost, less the estimated scrap value of the vessels.
Gain / (Loss) on Sale of Vessels
The gain or loss on the sale of a vessel is presented in a separate line item in our consolidated statements of income. In each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024, we sold five, nine and ten vessels, respectively.
Foreign Exchange Gains / (Losses)
Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar because our vessels operate in international shipping markets, and therefore transact business mainly in U.S. dollars. Our books of accounts are maintained in U.S. dollars. Transactions involving other currencies are converted into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. The gain or loss derives from the different foreign currency exchange rates between the time that a cost is recorded in our books and the time that the cost is paid. At the balance sheet dates, monetary assets and liabilities, which are denominated in other currencies, are translated into U.S. dollars at the year-end exchange rates.
Resulting gains or losses are reflected as foreign exchange gains / (losses) in our consolidated statement of income.
Other, Net
Other expenses represent primarily non-recurring items that are not classified under the other categories of our consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Such expenses may, for instance, result from various potential claims against our Company, or from payments we are effecting on behalf of charterers that cannot meet their obligations.
Interest Income, Interest and Finance Costs
We incur interest expense on outstanding indebtedness under our existing credit arrangements which we include in interest expense. Finance costs also include financing and legal costs in connection with establishing and amending those facilities, which are deferred and amortized to interest and finance costs during the life of the related debt using the effective interest method. Unamortized fees relating to loans repaid or refinanced, meeting the criteria of debt extinguishment, are expensed in the period the repayment or refinancing is made. Further, we earn interest on cash deposits in interest-bearing accounts and on interest-bearing securities, which we include in interest income. We will incur additional interest expense in the future on our outstanding borrowings and under future borrowings. For a description of our existing credit facilities and our new committed term loan please read “—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Gain / (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
We enter into interest rate swap contracts, cross-currency swap agreements and interest rate cap agreements to manage our exposure to fluctuations of interest rate and foreign currencies risks associated with specific borrowings. Furthermore, we enter into forward freight agreements to establish market positions and to hedge our exposure to dry bulk freight rates, we enter into bunker swap agreements to hedge our relative exposure and we also enter into European Union Allowance (“EUA”) futures agreements to hedge our exposure to emissions. All derivatives are recognized in the consolidated financial statements at their fair value. On the inception date of the derivative contract, we designate the derivative as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow to be paid (“cash flow hedge”). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is qualified, designated and highly effective as a cash flow hedge are recorded in Other comprehensive income until earnings are affected by the forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow and are then reported in earnings. Changes in the fair value of undesignated derivative instruments and the ineffective portion of designated derivative instruments are reported in earnings in the period in which those fair value changes have occurred. For a description of our existing derivative instruments, please read “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—A. Quantitative Information About Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk”.
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2024 compared to year ended December 31, 2023
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had an average of 105.6 and 111.4 vessels, respectively, in our owned fleet. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, through CBI we chartered-in an average of 62.3 and 43.1 third-party dry bulk vessels, respectively. As of February 4, 2025, CBI has chartered-in 51 dry bulk vessels on period charters.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we took delivery of the secondhand dry bulk vessels Miracle, Prosper, Frontier, Magnes, Alwine and August with an aggregate dwt of 843,679 and we sold the dry bulk vessels Manzanillo, Progress, Konstantinos, Merida, Alliance, Pegasus, Adventure, Oracle, Titan I and Discovery with an aggregate dwt of 433,033.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we (i) sold our 49% equity interest in the company owning the 2018-built, 3,800 TEU capacity containership, Polar Argentina to York Capital, (ii) acquired the 51% equity interest of York Capital in the 2018-built, 3,800 TEU capacity containership Polar Brasil and as a result we obtained 100% of the equity interest in the vessel and (iii) we acquired the 51% equity interest of York Capital in the 2001-built, 1,550 TEU capacity containership Arkadia and as a result we obtained 100% of the equity interest in the vessel.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2023, we acquired the secondhand dry bulk vessels Enna, Dorado and Arya with an aggregate dwt of 417,241 and we sold the container vessels Maersk Kalamata, Sealand Washington and Oakland with an aggregate TEU capacity of 18,182 and the dry bulk vessels Miner, Taibo, Comity, Peace, Pride and Cetus with an aggregate dwt of 248,655.
As of December 31, 2024, we have invested in NML the amount of $123.3 million. NML has been included in our consolidated financial statements since the second quarter of 2023.
In the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, our fleet ownership days totaled 38,661 and 40,652 days, respectively. Ownership days are one of the primary drivers of voyage revenue and vessels’ operating expenses and represent the aggregate number of days in a period during which each vessel in our fleet is owned.
Consolidated Financial Results and Vessels’ Operational Data
| | Year ended December 31, | | | | | | | |
(Expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) | | 2023 | | | 2024 | | | Change | | | Percentage Change | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Voyage revenue | | $ | 1,502.5 | | | $ | 1,849.9 | | | $ | 347.4 | | | | 23.1 | % |
Voyage revenue – related parties | | | - | | | | 210.1 | | | | 210.1 | | | n.m. | |
Total voyage revenue | | | 1,502.5 | | | | 2,060.0 | | | | 557.5 | | | | 37.1 | % |
Income from investments in leaseback vessels | | | 8.9 | | | | 23.9 | | | | 15.0 | | | | 168.5 | % |
Voyage expenses | | | (275.9 | ) | | | (371.1 | ) | | | 95.2 | | | | 34.5 | % |
Charter-in hire expenses | | | (340.9 | ) | | | (706.6 | ) | | | 365.7 | | | | 107.3 | % |
Voyage expenses – related parties | | | (14.0 | ) | | | (21.6 | ) | | | 7.6 | | | | 54.3 | % |
Vessels’ operating expenses | | | (258.1 | ) | | | (240.2 | ) | | | (17.9 | ) | | | (6.9 | %) |
General and administrative expenses | | | (18.4 | ) | | | (25.0 | ) | | | 6.6 | | | | 35.9 | % |
Management and agency fees – related parties | | | (56.3 | ) | | | (59.3 | ) | | | 3.0 | | | | 5.3 | % |
General and administrative expenses – non-cash component | | | (5.8 | ) | | | (8.4 | ) | | | 2.6 | | | | 44.8 | % |
Amortization of dry-docking and special survey costs | | | (19.8 | ) | | | (23.6 | ) | | | 3.8 | | | | 19.2 | % |
Depreciation | | | (166.3 | ) | | | (164.2 | ) | | | (2.1 | ) | | | (1.3 | %) |
Gain on sale of vessels, net | | | 112.2 | | | | 3.8 | | | | (108.4 | ) | | | (96.6 | %) |
Loss on vessels held for sale | | | (2.3 | ) | | | - | | | | (2.3 | ) | | n.m. | |
Vessels’ impairment loss | | | (0.4 | ) | | | - | | | | (0.4 | ) | | n.m. | |
Foreign exchange gains / (losses) | | | 2.6 | | | | (5.4 | ) | | | (8.0 | ) | | n.m. | |
Interest income | | | 32.4 | | | | 33.2 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 2.5 | % |
Interest and finance costs | | | (144.4 | ) | | | (133.1 | ) | | | (11.3 | ) | | | (7.8 | %) |
Income from equity method investments | | | 0.8 | | | | - | | | | (0.8 | ) | | n.m. | |
Other | | | 6.9 | | | | 2.8 | | | | (4.1 | ) | | | (59.4 | %) |
Gain /(Loss) on derivative instruments, net | | | 17.3 | | | | (48.9 | ) | | | (66.2 | ) | | n.m. | |
Net Income | | $ | 381.0 | | | $ | 316.3 | | | | | | | | | |
Vessels’ operational data | | Year ended December 31, | | | | | | | |
| | 2023 | | | 2024 | | | Change | | | Percentage Change | |
Average number of vessels | | | 111.4 | | | | 105.6 | | | | (5.8 | ) | | | (5.2 | %) |
Ownership days | | | 40,652 | | | | 38,661 | | | | (1,991 | ) | | | (4.9 | %) |
Number of vessels under dry-docking and special survey | | | 25 | | | | 12 | | | | (13 | ) | | | | |
Segmental Financial Information
The Company has four reportable segments and has identified the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as the Chief Operation Decision Maker (CODM) in accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting. The CODM is responsible for assessing performance, allocating resources, and making strategic decisions across the Company’s business segments. The CODM uses segment profit/(loss) to assess performance and allocate resources (including financial or capital resources) to each segment, primarily through segment performance reviews. Such resources allocation is relied upon not only for the reported segments’ results but also for the CODM’s view and estimates as to the future prospects of each segment. The tables below present information about the Company’s reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
For the year ended December 31, 2024 | |
(Expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | | Container vessels segment | | | Dry bulk vessels segment | | | CBI | | | NML | |
Voyage revenue | | $ | 864.6 | | | $ | 175.6 | | | $ | 809.7 | | | $ | - | |
Intersegment voyage revenue | | | - | | | | 22.1 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Voyage revenue -related parties | | | - | | | | - | | | | 210.1 | | | | - | |
Income from investment in leaseback vessels | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 23.9 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 864.6 | | | $ | 197.7 | | | $ | 1,019.8 | | | $ | 23.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Voyage expenses | | | (25.8 | ) | | | (21.0 | ) | | | (325.3 | ) | | | - | |
Charter-in hire expenses | | | - | | | | - | | | | (727.6 | ) | | | - | |
Voyage expenses-related parties | | | (12.2 | ) | | | (2.4 | ) | | | (7.0 | ) | | | - | |
Vessels’ operating expenses | | | (158.2 | ) | | | (82.0 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Realized losses on FFAs and bunker swaps, net | | | - | | | | - | | | | (15.6 | ) | | | - | |
Interest and finance costs | | | (99.5 | ) | | | (22.7 | ) | | | (1.9 | ) | | | (10.1 | ) |
Other segment items (2) | | | (144.1 | ) | | | (43.7 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Segment profit/ (loss) | | $ | 424.8 | | | $ | 25.9 | | | $ | (57.6 | ) | | $ | 13.8 | |
| (1) | The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the CODM. Intersegment expenses are included within the amounts shown. |
| (2) | Other segment items for each reportable segment include: (i) Container vessels segment – depreciation expense of the vessels and amortization of dry-docking and special survey costs and (ii) Dry bulk vessels segment - depreciation expense of the vessels and amortization of dry-docking and special survey costs. |
For the year ended December 31, 2023 | |
(Expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | | Container vessels segment | | | Dry bulk vessels segment | | | CBI | | | NML | |
Voyage revenue | | $ | 839.4 | | | $ | 155.9 | | | $ | 507.2 | | | $ | - | |
Intersegment voyage revenue | | | - | | | | 11.9 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Income from investment in leaseback vessels | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8.9 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 839.4 | | | $ | 167.8 | | | $ | 507.2 | | | $ | 8.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Voyage expenses | | | (12.5 | ) | | | (32.2 | ) | | | (231.6 | ) | | | - | |
Charter-in hire expenses | | | - | | | | - | | | | (352.4 | ) | | | - | |
Voyage expenses-related parties | | | (11.9 | ) | | | (2.1 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Vessels’ operating expenses | | | (161.2 | ) | | | (96.9 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Realized losses on FFAs and bunker swaps, net | | | - | | | | - | | | | (4.7 | ) | | | - | |
Interest and finance costs | | | (117.0 | ) | | | (23.9 | ) | | | (1.2 | ) | | | (2.2 | ) |
Other segment items (2) | | | (142.1 | ) | | | (44.1 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Segment profit/ (loss) | | $ | 394.7 | | | $ | (31.4 | ) | | $ | (82.7 | ) | | $ | 6.7 | |
| (1) | The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the CODM. Intersegment expenses are included within the amounts shown. |
| (2) | Other segment items for each reportable segment include: (i) Container vessels segment – depreciation expense of the vessels and amortization of dry-docking and special survey costs and (ii) Dry bulk vessels segment - depreciation expense of the vessels and amortization of dry-docking and special survey costs. |
The Company reports its financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, management believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures used in managing the business may provide users of these financial measures additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior operating periods. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures can provide additional meaningful reflection of underlying trends of the business because they provide a comparison of historical information that excludes certain items that impact the overall comparability. Management also uses these non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operating and planning decisions and in evaluating the Company’s performance. The table below sets out our Voyage revenue adjusted on a cash basis and the corresponding reconciliation to Voyage revenue for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
| | Year ended December 31, | | | | | | | |
(Expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) | | 2023 | | | 2024 | | | Change | | | Percentage Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total voyage revenue | | $ | 1,502.5 | | | $ | 2,060.0 | | | $ | 557.5 | | | | 37.1 | % |
Accrued charter revenue (1) | | | 3.3 | | | | (6.8 | ) | | | (10.1 | ) | | n.m. | |
Amortization of time-charter assumed | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.6 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | n.m. | |
Total voyage revenue adjusted on a cash basis (2) | | $ | 1,505.6 | | | $ | 2,052.6 | | | $ | 547.0 | | | | 36.3 | % |
(1) | Total voyage revenue adjusted on a cash basis represents Total voyage revenue after adjusting for non-cash “Accrued charter revenue” recorded under charters with escalating charter rates. |
(2) | Total voyage revenue adjusted on a cash basis is not a recognized measurement under U.S. GAAP. We believe that the presentation of Total voyage revenue adjusted on a cash basis is useful to investors because it presents the charter revenue for the relevant period based on the then-current daily charter rates. The increases or decreases in daily charter rates under our charter party agreements are described in the notes to the table in “Item 4. Information On the Company—Business Overview—Our Fleet, Acquisitions and Vessels Under Construction”. |
Total Voyage Revenue
Total voyage revenue increased by 37.1%, or $557.5 million, to $2,060.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, from $1,502.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2023.
The increase is mainly attributable to (i) increased revenue earned by CBI due to the increased volume of its operations year over year, (ii) increased charter rates in certain of our owned container and dry bulk vessels, (iii) revenue earned by two container vessels acquired during the second and fourth quarter of 2023, respectively, three dry bulk vessels acquired during the third quarter of 2023 and six dry bulk vessels acquired during the year ended December 31, 2024, and (iv) decreased fleet off-hire and idle days in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023; partly offset by revenue not earned by one container vessel and six dry bulk vessels sold during the year ended 2023 and ten dry bulk vessels sold during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Total voyage revenue adjusted on a cash basis (which eliminates non-cash “Accrued charter revenue”) increased by 36.3%, or $547.0 million, to $2,052.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, from $1,505.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. Accrued charter revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was a negative amount of $6.8 million and a positive amount of $3.3 million, respectively.
Income from investments in leaseback vessels
Income from investments in leaseback vessels was $23.9 million and $8.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Increased income from investments in leaseback vessels, year over year, is attributable to (i) the income earned from NML’s operations for the entire year ended December 31, 2024 (in 2023, we earned income from NML’s operations starting from the second quarter of 2023) and (ii) the increased volume of NML’s operations during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. NML acquires, owns and bareboat charters out vessels through its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Voyage Expenses
Voyage expenses were $371.1 million and $275.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Voyage expenses increased, year over year, mainly due to CBI’s increased volume of operations during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Voyage expenses mainly include (i) fuel consumption mainly related to dry bulk vessels, (ii) third-party commissions, (iii) port expenses and (iv) canal tolls.
Charter-in Hire Expenses
Charter-in hire expenses were $706.6 million and $340.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Charter-in hire expenses are expenses relating to chartering-in of third-party dry bulk vessels under charter agreements through CBI. Charter-in expenses increased, year over year, mainly due to CBI’s increased volume of operations during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Voyage Expenses – related parties
Voyage expenses – related parties were $21.6 million and $14.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Voyage expenses – related parties represent (i) fees of 1.25%, in the aggregate, on voyage revenues earned by our owned fleet charged by a related manager and a related service provider, (ii) charter brokerage fees (in respect of our container vessels) payable to two related charter brokerage companies for an amount of approximately $1.5 million and $1.4 million, in the aggregate, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and (iii) address commissions on certain charter-out agreements payable to a related agent since the second quarter of 2024. This commission is subsequently paid in full on a back-to-back basis by the related agent to its respective third-party clients with no benefit for the related agent.
Vessels’ Operating Expenses
Vessels’ operating expenses, which also include the realized gain/(loss) under derivative contracts entered into in relation to foreign currency exposure, were $240.2 million and $258.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Daily vessels’ operating expenses were $6,213 and $6,349 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Daily operating expenses are calculated as vessels’ operating expenses for the period over the ownership days of the period.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $25.0 million and $18.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and include amounts of $2.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively, that were paid to a related service provider.
Management and Agency Fees – related parties
Management fees charged by our related party managers were $43.6 million and $44.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The amounts charged by our related party managers include amounts paid to third-party managers of $10.5 million and $14.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Furthermore, during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, agency fees of $15.7 million and $11.7 million, in aggregate, were charged by four related agents in connection with the operations of CBI.
General and Administrative Expenses – non-cash component
General and administrative expenses - non-cash component for the year ended December 31, 2024 amounted to $8.4 million, representing the value of the shares issued to a related service provider on March 29, 2024, June 28, 2024, September 30, 2024 and December 30, 2024. General and administrative expenses – non-cash component for the year ended December 31, 2023 amounted to $5.8 million, representing the value of the shares issued to a related service provider on March 30, 2023, June 30, 2023, September 29, 2023 and December 29, 2023.
Amortization of Dry-Docking and Special Survey Costs
Amortization of deferred dry-docking and special survey costs was $23.6 million and $19.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2024, 11 vessels underwent and completed its dry-docking and special survey and one vessel was in the process of completing her dry-docking and special survey. During the year ended December 31, 2023, 23 vessels underwent and completed their dry-docking and special survey and two vessels were in the process of completing their dry-docking and special survey.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $164.2 million and $166.3 million, respectively.
Gain on Sale of Vessels, net
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded a net gain of $3.8 million from (i) the sale of the dry bulk vessels Manzanillo, Progress and Konstantinos, each of which was classified as a vessel held for sale as of December 31, 2023, (ii) the sale of the dry bulk vessels Merida, Alliance and Pegasus, (iii) the sale of the dry bulk vessel Adventure which was classified as a vessel held for sale as of March 31, 2024 (initially classified as a vessel held for sale as of December 31, 2023), (iv) the sale of the dry bulk vessel Oracle which was classified as a vessel held for sale as of June 30, 2024 and (v) the sale of the dry bulk vessels Titan I and Discovery. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded an aggregate net gain of $112.2 million from (i) the sale of the container vessel Oakland, which was classified as a vessel held for sale as of September 30, 2023, (ii) the sale of the container vessels Maersk Kalamata and Sealand Washington, each of which was classified as a vessel held for sale as of December 31, 2022 (initially classified as vessels held for sale as of March 31, 2022), (iii) the sale of the dry bulk vessel Taibo, which was classified as a vessel held for sale as of March 31, 2023, (iv) the sale of the dry bulk vessels Peace, Pride, Cetus, Miner and Comity and (v) the result of the accounting classification of the container vessels Vela and Vulpecula as “Net investment in Sale type lease (Vessels)”.
Loss on Vessels Held for Sale
We did not record any loss on any vessels held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded a loss on vessels held for sale of $2.3 million, representing the expected loss from the sale of the dry bulk vessels Konstantinos and Progress during the next twelve-month period. Furthermore, during the year ended December 31, 2023, the dry bulk vessels Manzanillo and Adventure were classified as vessels held for sale but no loss on vessels held for sale was recorded, since each vessel’s estimated fair value less costs to sell exceeded each vessel’s carrying value.
Vessels’ Impairment Loss
During the year ended December 31, 2024, no impairment loss was recorded. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded an impairment loss in relation to two of our dry bulk vessels in the amount of $0.4 million in the aggregate.
Interest Income
Interest income amounted to $33.2 million and $32.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Interest and Finance Costs
Interest and finance costs were $133.1 million and $144.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The decrease is mainly attributable to the decreased interest expense due to a lower average loan balance during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Income /(Loss) from Equity Method Investments
Income/(loss) from equity method investments for the year ended December 31, 2024, was nil (income of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023) representing our share in jointly owned companies set up pursuant to the Framework Deed. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we (i) sold our 49% equity interest in the company owning the 2018-built, 3,800 TEU capacity containership, Polar Argentina to York Capital, (ii) acquired the 51% equity interest of York Capital in the 2018-built, 3,800 TEU capacity containership Polar Brasil and as result we acquired the 100% equity interest in the vessel and (iii) acquired the 51% equity interest of York Capital in the 2001-built, 1,550 TEU capacity containership Arkadia and as a result we obtained 100% of the equity interest in the vessel. As of December 31, 2023, two companies were jointly owned pursuant to the Framework Deed neither of which owned container vessels. As of December 31, 2024, there were no jointly owned companies pursuant to the Framework Deed.
Gain / (loss) on Derivative Instruments, net
As of December 31, 2024, we hold derivative financial instruments that qualify for hedge accounting and derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting. The change in the fair value of each derivative instrument that qualifies for hedge accounting is recorded in “Other Comprehensive Income” (“OCI”). The change in the fair value of each derivative instrument that does not qualify for hedge accounting is recorded in the consolidated statements of income.
As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of these instruments, in aggregate, amounted to a net liability of $7.4 million. During the year ended December 31, 2024, a net loss of $4.0 million has been included in OCI and a net loss of $48.9 million has been included in Gain / (loss) on Derivative Instruments, net.
Year ended December 31, 2023 compared to year ended December 31, 2022
For a discussion of the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023.
B.
| Liquidity and Capital Resources |
Historically, our principal sources of funds have been operating cash flows and long-term financing in the form of bank borrowings, unsecured bond loans or sale and leaseback transactions. Our principal uses of funds have been capital expenditures to establish, grow and maintain our fleet, comply with international shipping standards, environmental laws and regulations, fund working capital requirements and pay dividends. In monitoring our working capital needs, we project our charter hire income and vessels’ maintenance and running expenses, as well as debt service obligations, and seek to maintain adequate cash reserves in order to address any budget overruns.
Our primary short-term liquidity needs relate to funding our vessel operating expenses, debt repayment, lease payment and payment of quarterly dividends on our outstanding preferred and common stock. Our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate to additional vessel acquisitions in the containership and dry bulk sectors for fleet renewal or expansion, debt repayments and lease payments. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds will be cash from operations, along with borrowings under new credit facilities, finance leases and other financing arrangements that we intend to obtain from time to time in connection with vessel acquisitions. We believe that these sources of funds will be sufficient to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity needs, including our agreements, subject to certain conditions, to acquire newbuild vessels, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain future debt financing on terms acceptable to us.
In addition, since our initial public offering in 2010, we have completed several equity offerings. On March 27, 2012, the Company completed a follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 7,500,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $14.10 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $100.6 million. On October 19, 2012, the Company completed a second follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 7,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $14.00 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $93.5 million. On August 7, 2013, the Company completed a public equity offering of 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $48.0 million. On January 21, 2014, the Company completed a public equity offering of 4,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $96.5 million. On May 13, 2015, the Company completed a public equity offering of 4,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $96.6 million. On December 5, 2016, the Company completed a third follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $6.00 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $69.0 million. On May 31, 2017, the Company completed a fourth follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 13,500,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $7.10 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $91.68 million. On January 30, 2018, the Company completed a public equity offering of 4,600,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $111.2 million. The Company completed the full redemption of all of its 4,574,100 outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock on July 15, 2024. As of February 12, 2025, we had available $500 million under a Form F-3 shelf registration statement for future issuances of securities in the public market.
On November 30, 2022, we announced our dry bulk operating platform. In connection with the establishment of the dry bulk operating platform, we initially invested $100 million and we agreed to invest up to an additional $100 million in the new line of business under certain conditions. As of February 12, 2025, we have invested an aggregate of $203.4 million and have extended unsecured loans to Costamare Bulkers in the amount of $85 million. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company”.
On March 16, 2023, we announced our investment in a leasing business. In connection with the investment, we agreed to invest up to $200 million in the new line of business as provided for in the Neptune Shareholders’ Agreement. As of February 12, 2025, we have invested an aggregate of $123.3 million. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company”.
As of December 31, 2024, we had total cash liquidity of $777.9 million, consisting of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash.
As of February 12, 2025, we had three series of preferred stock outstanding, approximately $49.3 million aggregate liquidation preference of the Series B Preferred Stock, approximately $99.3 million aggregate liquidation preference of the Series C Preferred Stock and approximately $99.7 million aggregate liquidation preference of the Series D Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock carry an annual dividend rate of 7.625% per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share and are redeemable by us at any time. The Series C Preferred Stock carry an annual dividend rate of 8.50% per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share and are redeemable by us at any time. The Series D Preferred Stock carry an annual dividend rate of 8.75% per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share and are redeemable by us at any time. The Company completed the full redemption of all of its 4,574,100 outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock on July 15, 2024. The Company funded the redemption with cash on hand.
As of December 31, 2024, we had an aggregate of $2.1 billion of indebtedness outstanding under various credit agreements, including our finance leases and other financing arrangements.
As of February 12, 2025, we had seven unencumbered vessels in the water.
Our common stock dividend policy and our preferred stock dividend obligations also impact our future liquidity needs. For more information regarding our dividend payments, please see “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information”.
On July 6, 2016, we implemented the Dividend Reinvestment Plan and registered 30 million shares for issuance under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The Dividend Reinvestment Plan offers holders of our common stock the opportunity to purchase additional shares by having their cash dividends automatically reinvested in our common stock. Participation in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan is optional, and shareholders who decide not to participate in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan will continue to receive cash dividends, as declared and paid in the usual manner. On February 7, 2024, May 6, 2024, August 6, 2024, November 6, 2024 and February 6, 2025, we issued 420,178 shares, 369,223 shares, 185,758 shares, 6,251 shares and 7,056 shares, respectively, pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Our Chairman and CEO, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, reinvested all his cash dividends on the aforementioned dates until August 6, 2024, after which Mr. Konstantakopoulos terminated his participation in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
On November 30, 2021, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing total repurchases of us to a maximum of $150 million of our common shares and up to $150 million of our preferred shares. Shares may be purchased from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions, or other financial arrangements at times and prices that are considered to be appropriate by the Company. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company acquired 6,267,808 common shares for a total amount of $60.0 million, with the average purchase price of $9.57 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not acquire any common shares. See “Item 16.E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers”.
Working Capital Position
We have historically financed our capital requirements with cash flow from operations, equity contributions from stockholders and long-term financing in the form of bank debt, unsecured bond loans or sale and leaseback transactions. Our main uses of funds have been capital expenditures for the acquisition of new vessels, for fleet renewal or expansion, expenditures incurred in connection with ensuring that our vessels comply with international and regulatory standards, repayments of bank loans and payments of dividends. We will require capital to fund ongoing operations, the construction of our new vessels, the acquisition cost of any secondhand vessels we agree to acquire in the future and debt service. Working capital, which is current assets minus current liabilities, including the current portion of long-term debt, was positive $294.7 million at December 31, 2024 and positive $454.9 million at December 31, 2023.
We anticipate that internally generated cash flow will be sufficient to fund the operations of our fleet, including our working capital requirements. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Cash Flows
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | (Expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | |
Condensed cash flows | | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | | $ | 331.4 | | | $ | 537.7 | |
Net Cash Provided by / (Used in) Investing Activities | | $ | 79.1 | | | $ | (79.5 | ) |
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities | | $ | (396.8 | ) | | $ | (505.5 | ) |
Years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, increased by $206.3 million to $537.7 million, from $331.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase is mainly attributable to the increased cash from operations during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, to the favorable change in working capital position, excluding the current portion of long-term debt and the accrued charter revenue (representing the difference between cash received in that period and revenue recognized on a straight-line basis), to the decrease in interest payments (including interest derivatives net receipts) during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 and to the decreased dry-docking and special survey costs during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Net Cash Provided by / (Used in) Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $79.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2024, which mainly consisted of (i) a settlement payment for the delivery of the secondhand dry bulk vessel Miracle, (ii) payments for the acquisition of the secondhand dry bulk vessels Prosper, Frontier, Magnes, Alwine and August, (iii) payments for upgrades for certain of our container and dry bulk vessels and (iv) net payments for investments into which NML entered; partly offset by proceeds we received from the sale of the dry bulk vessels Manzanillo, Progress, Konstantinos, Merida, Alliance, Pegasus, Adventure, Oracle, Titan I and Discovery.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $79.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, which mainly consisted of proceeds we received from (i) the sale of the container vessels Sealand Washington, Maersk Kalamata and Oakland and the dry bulk vessels Miner, Taibo, Comity, Peace, Pride and Cetus and (ii) the maturity of our short-term investments in US Treasury Bills; partly off-set by payments for the purchase of short-term investments in US Treasury Bills, payments for upgrades for certain of our container and dry bulk vessels, payments for the acquisition of the secondhand dry bulk vessels Enna, Dorado and Arya, an advance payment for the acquisition of the secondhand dry bulk vessel Iron Miracle (“Miracle”) and net payments for investments into which NML entered.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $505.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2024, which mainly consisted of (i) $209.0 million net payments relating to our debt financing agreements and finance lease liability agreement (including proceeds of $528.0 million we received from 18 debt financing agreements), (ii) $116.0 million we paid, in aggregate, for the full redemption of our Series E Preferred Stock, (iii) $105.0 million we paid for the full prepayment of our unsecured bond loan, (iv) $43.6 million we paid for dividends to holders of our common stock for the fourth quarter of 2023, the first quarter of 2024, the second quarter of 2024 and the third quarter of 2024 and (v) $3.8 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series B Preferred Stock, $8.5 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series C Preferred Stock and $8.7 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series D Preferred Stock for the periods from October 15, 2023 to January 14, 2024, January 15, 2024 to April 14, 2024, April 15, 2024 to July 14, 2024 and July 15, 2024 to October 14, 2024 and $5.1 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series E Preferred Stock for the periods from October 15, 2023 to January 14, 2024 and January 15, 2024 to April 14, 2024.
Net cash used in financing activities was $396.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, which mainly consisted of (a) $256.0 million net payments relating to our debt financing agreements and finance lease liability agreement (including proceeds of $576.2 million we received from eight debt financing agreements), (b) $60.0 million we paid for the re-purchase of 6.3 million of our common shares, (c) $39.1 million we paid for dividends to holders of our common stock for the fourth quarter of 2022, the first quarter of 2023, the second quarter of 2023 and the third quarter of 2023 and (d) $3.8 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series B Preferred Stock, $8.5 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series C Preferred Stock, $8.7 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series D Preferred Stock and $10.2 million we paid for dividends to holders of our Series E Preferred Stock for the periods from October 15, 2022 to January 14, 2023, January 15, 2023 to April 14, 2023, April 15, 2023 to July 14, 2023 and July 15, 2023 to October 14, 2023.
For a discussion of the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements
We operate in a capital-intensive industry, which requires significant amounts of investment, and we fund a portion of this investment through long-term debt, mainly from banks or other financial institutions. We have entered into a number of credit facilities, finance leases and other financing arrangements in order to finance the acquisition of the vessels owned by our subsidiaries and for general corporate purposes. We act either as direct borrower or as guarantor and certain of our subsidiaries act respectively as guarantors or as borrowers. The obligations under our credit facilities, finance leases and other financing arrangements are secured by, among other things, first priority mortgages over the vessels owned by the respective subsidiaries, charter assignments, first priority assignments of all insurances and earnings of the mortgaged vessels and guarantees by Costamare Inc. or the companies owning the financed vessels.
As of December 31, 2024, the interest rate on all of our existing credit facilities, finance leases and other financing arrangements is either a fixed rate or based on SOFR floating rates.
As of December 31, 2024, our existing credit facilities, finance leases and other financing arrangements have an aggregate outstanding balance of $2.1 billion. For more information on our Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements, please see Notes 11 and 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
The following table summarizes certain terms of our existing drawn credit facilities, finance leases and other financing arrangements discussed below as at December 31, 2024:
Borrowers under Our Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements | | Outstanding Principal Amount | | | | | | |
| | (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) | | | | | | |
Bank Debt | | | | | | | | |
Quentin Shipping Co. and Sander Shipping Co. | | | 64,250 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2030 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Reddick Shipping Co. and Verandi Shipping Co. | | | 21,000 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2027 | | Straight-line amortization |
Ainsley Maritime Co. and Ambrose Maritime Co. | | | 109,821 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2031 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Hyde Maritime Co. and Skerrett Maritime Co. | | | 104,596 | | Fixed Rate / SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Kemp Maritime Co. | | | 52,825 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Achilleas Maritime Corp. et al. | | | 33,492 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2026-2027 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
Costamare Inc. | | | 27,750 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2026 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Bastian et al. | | | 199,390 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
Benedict et al. | | | 294,762 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2027 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Borrowers under Our Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements | | | Outstanding Principal Amount | | | | | Maturity
| | |
Kalamata Shipping Corporation et al. | | | 54,000 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Capetanissa Maritime Corp. et al. | | | 18,917 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Adstone Marine Corp. et al. | | | 147,709 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Archet Marine Corp. et al. | | | 72,000 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2030 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
Andati Marine Corp. et al. | | | 84,931 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Silkstone Marine Corp. et al. | | | 34,611 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 2 | | | 23,250 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 3 | | | 8,190 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 4 | | | 11,628 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 5 | | | 4,942 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 6 | | | 5,510 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 7 | | | 9,581 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 8 | | | 11,196 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 9 | | | 10,900 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 10 | | | 21,392 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 11 | | | 16,485 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 12 | | | 5,910 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 13 | | | 5,302 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Borrowers under Our Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements | | | Outstanding Principal Amount | | | | | Maturity
| | |
NML Loan 14 | | | 4,385 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2028 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
NML Loan 15 | | | 5,130 | | SOFR + Margin(2) | | | 2029 | | Straight-line amortization with balloon |
Other Financing Arrangements | | | | | | | | | | |
Barkley et al. Financing arrangements | | | 339,396 | | Fixed Rate | | | 2030-2031 | | Bareboat structure-fixed daily charter with balloon |
Bertrand et al. Financing arrangements | | | 245,236 | | Fixed Rate | | | 2028 | | Variable amortization with balloon |
Finance Leases | | | | | | | | | | |
Sykes Maritime Co. Finance Lease | | | 23,955 | | Fixed Rate | | | 2025 | | Bareboat structure-fixed daily charter with balloon |
(1) | The interest rates of long-term bank debt at December 31, 2024 ranged from 2.99% to 6.63%, and the weighted average interest rate as at December 31, 2024 was 4.9%. Such calculations have accounted for fixed rate long-term bank debt and interest rate swaps/caps. |
(2) | The interest rate margin of long-term bank debt at December 31, 2024 ranged from 1.45% to 3.90%, and the weighted average interest rate margin as at December 31, 2024 was 2.2%. |
The full prepayment of $105.0 million of the unsecured bonds issued by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Costamare Participations Plc, was made with cash on hand on November 25, 2024.
Covenants and Events of Default
The credit facilities impose certain operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions in our existing credit facilities generally limit Costamare Inc. and/or our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
| • | pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividends; |
| • | purchase or otherwise acquire for value any shares of the subsidiaries’ capital; |
| • | make loans or assume financial obligations which are not subordinated to the respective credit facilities; |
| • | make investments in other persons; |
| • | sell or transfer significant assets, including any vessel or vessels mortgaged under the credit facilities, to any person other than as per the provisions of the respective credit facilities; |
| • | create liens on assets; or |
| • | allow the Konstantakopoulos family’s direct or indirect holding in Costamare Inc. to fall below 30% of the total issued share capital. |
Our existing drawn credit facilities also require Costamare Inc. and certain of our subsidiaries to maintain at all times the aggregate of (a) the market value of the mortgaged vessel or vessels and (b) the market value of any additional security provided to the lenders, above a percentage ranging between 110% to 125% of the then-outstanding amount of the credit facility and any related swap exposure.
Costamare Inc. is required to maintain compliance with the following financial covenants to maintain minimum liquidity, minimum market value adjusted net worth, interest coverage and leverage ratios, as defined.
| • | the ratio of our total liabilities (after deducting all cash and cash equivalents) to market value adjusted total assets (after deducting all cash and cash equivalents) may not exceed 0.75:1; |
| • | the ratio of EBITDA over net interest expense must be equal to or higher than 2.5:1, however such covenant should not be considered breached unless the Company’s liquidity is less than 5% of the total debt; |
| • | the aggregate amount of all cash and cash equivalents may not be less than the greater of (i) $30 million or (ii) 3% of the total debt; and |
| • | the market value adjusted net worth must at all times exceed $500 million. |
Our credit facilities contain customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal or interest, breach of covenants or material inaccuracy of representations, default under other indebtedness in excess of a threshold and bankruptcy.
The Company is not in default under any of its credit facilities.
Capital Expenditures
As of December 31, 2024, we had outstanding equity commitments of (i) $180 million in relation to the acquisition of six vessels through NML from a joint venture, as guarantor, and related entities, as sellers, under sale and leaseback transactions, subject to final documentation, under which the vessels will be chartered back to the sellers under bareboat charter agreements (our chairman and chief executive officer Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos and a member of his family indirectly hold an equity interest of approximately 17% each in the joint venture); and (ii) $15 million in relation to the acquisition of two vessels through NML under sale and leaseback transactions, subject to final documentation, under which the vessels will be chartered back to the sellers under bareboat charter agreements.
As of February 12, 2025, we had outstanding equity commitments of (i) $180 million, as described above, in relation to the acquisition of six vessels through NML from a joint venture, as guarantor, and related entities; and (ii) $39.5 million in relation to the acquisition of five vessels through NML under sale and leaseback transactions, subject to final documentation, under which the vessels will be chartered back to the sellers under bareboat charter agreements.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
The shipping industry is a capital intensive industry, requiring significant amounts of investment. Much of this investment is provided in the form of long-term debt. Our debt usually contains interest rates that fluctuate with the financial markets. Increasing interest rates could adversely impact future earnings.
Our interest expense is affected by changes in the general level of interest rates, primarily SOFR based rates. As an indication of the extent of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, an increase of 100 basis points in the reference rates would have decreased our net income and cash flows during the year ended December 31, 2024 by approximately $5.0 million based upon our debt level during 2024.
For more information on our interest rate risk see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—A. Quantitative Information About Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk”.
Interest Rate and Cross-currency Swaps and interest rate caps
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements converting floating interest rate exposure into fixed interest rates in order to economically hedge our exposure to fluctuations in prevailing market interest rates. Furthermore, we have entered into a series of interest rate cap agreements to limit the maximum interest rate on the variable-rate debt of certain of our loans and to limit our exposure to interest rate variability when three-month SOFR exceeds a certain threshold. For more information on our interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements, refer to Notes 2, 22, 23 and 24 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Furthermore, as of December 31, 2024, we have entered into two cross-currency swap agreements to hedge the foreign exchange exposure with respect to the unsecured bond loan that was fully prepaid in November 2024 which was denominated in Euro. For more information on our two cross-currency swap agreements, refer to Notes 2, 22, 23 and 24 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We generate all of our revenue in U.S. dollars, but a substantial portion of our vessel operating expenses, primarily crew wages, are in currencies other than U.S. dollars (mainly in Euro), and any gain or loss we incur as a result of the U.S. dollar fluctuating in value against those currencies is included in vessel operating expenses. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 14% of our outstanding accounts payable were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (mainly in Euro). We hold cash and cash equivalents mainly in U.S. dollars.
As of December 31, 2024, we were engaged in 12 Euro/U.S. dollar contracts totaling $39.6 million at an average forward rate of Euro/U.S. dollar 1.0837, expiring in monthly intervals up to December 2025.
As of December 31, 2023, we were engaged in 24 Euro/U.S. dollar contracts totaling $78.6 million at an average forward rate of Euro/U.S. dollar 1.0730, expiring in monthly intervals up to December 2025.
As of December 31, 2022, we were engaged in 36 Euro/U.S. dollar contracts totaling $108.6 million at an average forward rate of Euro/U.S. dollar 1.0690, expiring in monthly intervals up to December 2025. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2022, we were engaged in eight Singapore dollar/U.S. dollar forward agreements totaling $7.3 million at an average forward rate of Singapore dollar/U.S. dollar 1.3411, with settlements up to December 2023.
We recognize these financial instruments on our balance sheet at their fair value. These foreign currency forward contracts do not qualify as hedging instruments, and thus we recognize changes in their fair value in our earnings.
C. | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. |
We incur from time to time expenditures relating to inspections for acquiring new vessels. Such expenditures are insignificant and are expensed as they are incurred.
Total seaborne container trade demand increased by 5.4% in 2024, compared to a minor increase of 0.7% in 2023. The primary reasons for such an increase, among others, were strong U.S. consumption and an increase of 17.7% in TEU-miles demand mainly due to container vessels rerouting around southern Africa to avoid the Suez Canal. As of January 2025, Clarksons Research estimates seaborne container trade demand in 2025 to increase by 2.8% compared to 2024.
Total containership supply grew at around 9.4% in 2024 and demolition activity remained at low levels.
According to Clarksons Research, idle containership fleet represented 2.1% of the total fleet at the end of 2024. Containership ordering in 2024 increased to 4.4 million TEU resulting in the orderbook of containership vessels being around 27% of the total fleet at the end of 2024; 74% of the orderbook consisted of vessels larger than 12,000 TEU. If the containership demand does not improve in the following years, there may be negative pressure on charter rates across the industry.
Total seaborne dry bulk trade demand increased by 3.3% in 2024 due to the increased seaborne demand for iron ore, coal, grains and other minerals. More specifically, seaborne demand for coal increased by 3.6% in 2024 and for iron ore by 3.4%.
The total supply of dry bulk vessels grew 3.0% during 2024, bringing the total fleet size to 1,034.2 million dwt. Ordering of new dry bulk vessels remained relatively slow for the entire year, and at the end of 2024, the total dry bulk vessel orderbook was 109.3 million dwt or 10.6% of the total fleet, with expected deliveries between 2025 and 2029.
E. | Critical Accounting Estimates |
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant judgments of uncertainties and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We describe below what we believe are our most critical accounting policies, because they generally involve a comparatively higher degree of judgment in their application. For a description of all our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Vessel Impairment
The Company reviews its vessels for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a vessel might not be recoverable. The Company considers information, such as vessel sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions in order to determine if an impairment might exist.
As part of the identification of impairment indicators and Step 1 of impairment analysis, the Company computes estimates of the future undiscounted net operating cash flows for each vessel based on assumptions regarding time charter rates, vessels’ operating expenses, vessels’ capital expenditures, vessels’ residual value, fleet utilization and the estimated remaining useful life of each vessel.
Container vessels: The future undiscounted net operating cash flows are determined as the sum of (x) (i) the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days and (ii) an estimated daily time charter rate for the unfixed days (based on the most recent ten year historical average rates after eliminating outliers and without adjustment for any growth rate) over the remaining estimated life of the vessel, assuming an estimated fleet utilization rate, less (y) (i) expected outflows for vessels’ operating expenses assuming an expected increase in expenses of 2.5% over a five-year period, based on management’s estimates taking into consideration the Company’s historical data, (ii) planned dry-docking and special survey expenditures and (iii) management fees expenditures. Charter rates for container shipping vessels are cyclical and subject to significant volatility based on factors beyond Company’s control. Therefore, the Company considers the most recent ten-year historical average, after eliminating outliers, to be a reasonable and fair estimation of expected future charter rates over the remaining useful life of the Company’s vessels. The Company defines outliers as index values provided by an independent, third-party maritime research services provider. The salvage value used in the impairment test is estimated at $0.300 per light weight ton in accordance with the container vessels’ depreciation policy.
Dry bulk vessels: The future undiscounted net operating cash flows are determined as the sum of (x) (i) the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days and (ii) an estimated daily time charter rate for the unfixed days (using the most recent ten-year average of historical one-year time charter rates available for each type of dry bulk vessel over the remaining estimated life of each vessel, net of commissions), assuming an estimated fleet utilization rate, less (y) (i) expected outflows for vessels’ operating expenses assuming an expected increase in expenses of 2.5% over a five-year period, based on management’s estimates, (ii) planned dry-docking and special survey expenditures and (iii) management fees expenditures. Charter rates for dry bulk vessels are cyclical and subject to significant volatility based on factors beyond Company’s control. Therefore, the Company considers the most recent ten-year average of historical one-year time charter rates available for each type of dry bulk vessel, to be a reasonable estimation of expected future charter rates over the remaining useful life of its dry bulk vessels. The Company believes the most recent ten-year average of historical one-year time charter rates available for each type of dry bulk vessel provide a fair estimate in determining a rate for long-term forecasts. The salvage value used in the impairment test is estimated at $0.300 per light weight ton in accordance with the dry bulk vessels’ depreciation policy.
The assumptions used to develop estimates of future undiscounted net operating cash flows are based on historical trends as well as future expectations. If those future undiscounted net operating cash flows are greater than a vessel’s carrying value, there are no impairment indications for such vessel. If those future undiscounted net operating cash flows are less than a vessel’s carrying value, the Company proceeds to Step 2 of the impairment analysis for such vessel.
In Step 2 of the impairment analysis, the Company determines the fair value of the vessels that failed Step 1 of the impairment analysis, based on management estimates and assumptions, making use of available market data and taking into consideration third-party valuations. Therefore, we have categorized the fair value of the vessels as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The difference between the carrying value of the vessels that failed Step 1 of the impairment analysis and their fair value as calculated in Step 2 of the impairment analysis is recognized in the Company’s accounts as impairment loss.
The review of the carrying amounts in connection with the estimated recoverable amount of the Company’s vessels as of December 31, 2024 resulted in no impairment loss being recorded. As of December 31, 2022 and 2023, our assessment concluded that $1.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of impairment loss should be recorded.
Charter rates are subject to change based on a variety of factors that we cannot control. If, as at December 31, 2023 and 2024, we were to utilize an estimated daily time charter equivalent for our vessels’ unfixed days based on the most recent five year, three year or one year historical average rates without adjusting for inflation (or another growth assumption), the impact would be the following:
| | | | | | |
| | No. of Container Vessels (*) | | | Amount ($ US Million) (**) | | | No. of Container Vessels (*) | | | Amount ($ US Million) (**) | |
5-year historical average rate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
3-year historical average rate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
1-year historical average rate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
(*) | Number of container vessels the carrying value of which would not have been recovered. |
(**) | Aggregate carrying value that would not have been recovered. |
| | | | | | |
| | No. of Dry bulk Vessels (*) | | | Amount ($ US Million) (**) | | | No. of Container Vessels (*) | | | Amount ($ US Million) (**) | |
5-year historical average rate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
3-year historical average rate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
1-year historical average rate | | | 2 | | | | 0.8 | | | | - | | | | - | |
(*) | Number of dry bulk vessels the carrying value of which would not have been recovered. |
(**) | Aggregate carrying value that would not have been recovered. |
In addition to the two step impairment analysis, the Company also conducts a separate internal analysis. This analysis uses a discounted cash flow model utilizing inputs and assumptions based on market observations as of December 31, 2024 and suggests that 7 of our 106 vessels in the water may have current market values below their carrying values (21 of our 106 vessels in the water as at December 31, 2023).
Although we believe that the assumptions used to evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective. There can be no assurance as to how long charter rates and vessel values will remain at their current levels or whether they will improve or deteriorate by any significant degree. It is possible that charter rates may remain at depressed levels for some time which could adversely affect our revenue, profitability and future assessments of vessel impairment.
While the Company intends to continue to hold and operate its vessels, the following table presents information with respect to the carrying amount of the Company’s vessels and indicates whether their estimated market values based on our internal discounted cash flow analysis are below their carrying values as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. For the calculation of the estimated market values, the Company used third-party valuations and the following methodology. For vessels with charters expiring before December 31, 2025 (i.e. within 12 months after the date of the annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024), the Company uses charter free third-party valuations as at December 31, 2024. For all other vessels, the Company uses: (A) third-party charter free valuations of each vessel at the earliest expiry date of the charter of each vessel (e.g., in determining the residual value of a 5-year old vessel with a time charter having its earliest expiry date five years after the date of the annual financial statements, the third-party valuation provides us with the charter free value of a 10-year old vessel with the same technical characteristics and specifications, which is representative of the residual value of the vessel at the earliest expiry date of its respective time charter) discounted to December 31, 2024 plus (B) the discounted future cash flow from the charter of each vessel until the earliest expiry date of that charter.
The carrying value of each of the Company’s vessels does not necessarily represent its fair value or the amount that could be obtained if the vessel were sold. The Company’s estimates of fair values (under our internal analysis) assume that the vessels are all in good and seaworthy condition without need for repair and, if inspected, would be certified as being in class without recommendations of any kind. In addition, because vessel values are highly volatile, these estimates may not be indicative of either the current or future prices that the Company could achieve if it were to sell any of the vessels. The Company would not record impairment for any of the vessels for which the estimated fair value is below its carrying value unless and until the Company either determines to sell the vessel for a loss or determines that the vessel’s carrying amount is not recoverable under Step 2 of the impairment analysis. For the vessels with estimated fair values lower than their carrying values, we believe that such differences will be recoverable throughout the useful lives of such vessels.
Containership Fleet
| | | | | | | | | | Carrying Value December 31, 2023 ($ US Million)(1) | | Carrying Value December 31, 2024 ($ US Million)(1) |
1 | | Triton | | 14,424 | | 2016 | | November 2018 | | 100.7 | | 96.6 |
2 | | Titan | | 14,424 | | 2016 | | November 2018 | | 101.3 | | 97.2 |
3 | | Talos | | 14,424 | | 2016 | | November 2018 | | 101.6 | | 97.5 |
4 | | Taurus | | 14,424 | | 2016 | | November 2018 | | 101.9 | | 97.7 |
5 | | Theseus | | 14,424 | | 2016 | | November 2018 | | 102.3 | | 98.1 |
6 | | YM Triumph | | 12,690 | | 2020 | | July 2020 | | 84.9 | | 82.1 |
7 | | YM Truth | | 12,690 | | 2020 | | August 2020 | | 84.9 | | 82.1 |
8 | | YM Totality | | 12,690 | | 2020 | | September 2020 | | 85.5 | | 82.7 |
9 | | YM Target | | 12,690 | | 2021 | | February 2021 | | 86.4 | | 83.6 |
10 | | YM Tiptop | | 12,690 | | 2021 | | May 2021 | | 87.6 | | 84.9 |
11 | | Cape Akritas | | 11,010 | | 2016 | | March 2021 | | 73.7 | | 70.7 |
12 | | Cape Tainaro | | 11,010 | | 2017 | | March 2021 | | 75.3 | | 72.0 |
13 | | Cape Kortia | | 11,010 | | 2017 | | March 2021 | | 75.6 | | 72.1 |
14 | | Cape Sounio | | 11,010 | | 2017 | | March 2021 | | 74.6 | | 71.5 |
15 | | Cape Artemisio | | 11,010 | | 2017 | | March 2021 | | 73.5 | | 70.4 |
16 | | Cosco Hellas | | 9,469 | | 2006 | | July 2006 | | 48.2 | | 45.0 |
17 | | Zim Shanghai (ex. Cosco Guangzhou) | | 9,469 | | 2006 | | February 2006 | | 46.8 | | 43.6 |
18 | | Beijing | | 9,469 | | 2006 | | June 2006 | | 47.6 | | 44.5 |
| | | | | | Built | | | | Carrying Value December 31, 2023 ($ US Million)(1) | | Carrying Value December 31, 2024 ($ US Million)(1) |
19 | | Yantian | | 9,469 | | 2006 | | April 2006 | | 47.4 | | 44.3 |
20 | | Yantian I (ex. Zim Yantian) | | 9,469 | | 2006 | | March 2006 | | 46.9 | | 43.8 |
21 | | MSC Azov ** | | 9,403 | | 2014 | | January 2014 | | 77.2 | | 73.6 |
22 | | MSC Ajaccio ** | | 9,403 | | 2014 | | March 2014 | | 74.8 | | 74.5 |
23 | | MSC Amalfi | | 9,403 | | 2014 | | April 2014 | | 75.3 | | 75.4 |
24 | | MSC Athens ** | | 8,827 | | 2013 | | March 2013 | | 74.8 | | 70.9 |
25 | | MSC Athos ** | | 8,827 | | 2013 | | April 2013 | | 74.2 | | 70.3 |
26 | | Valor | | 8,827 | | 2013 | | June 2013 | | 68.4 | | 65.2 |
27 | | Value | | 8,827 | | 2013 | | June 2013 | | 68.5 | | 65.3 |
28 | | Valiant | | 8,827 | | 2013 | | August 2013 | | 69.2 | | 65.9 |
29 | | Valence | | 8,827 | | 2013 | | September 2013 | | 69.7 | | 66.4 |
30 | | Vantage | | 8,827 | | 2013 | | November 2013 | | 69.7 | | 66.5 |
31 | | Navarino *,** | | 8,531 | | 2010 | | May 2010 | | 72.7 | | 68.8 |
32 | | Maersk Kleven | | 8,044 | | 1996 | | September 2018 | | 14.4 | | 13.4 |
33 | | Maersk Kotka | | 8,044 | | 1996 | | September 2018 | | 13.8 | | 12.9 |
34 | | Maersk Kowloon | | 7,471 | | 2005 | | May 2017 | | 13.6 | | 12.9 |
35 | | Kure | | 7,403 | | 1996 | | December 2007 | | 13.4 | | 12.7 |
36 | | Methoni | | 6,724 | | 2003 | | October 2011 | | 31.5 | | 31.4 |
37 | | Porto Cheli | | 6,712 | | 2001 | | June 2021 | | 30.8 | | 27.9 |
38 | | Tampa I (ex. Zim Tampa) | | 6,648 | | 2000 | | June 2000 | | 19.8 | | 17.8 |
39 | | Zim America (ex. Maersk Kingston) | | 6,644 | | 2003 | | April 2003 | | 27.6 | | 25.8 |
40 | | Zim Vietnam (ex. Maersk Kolkata) | | 6,644 | | 2003 | | January 2003 | | 28.0 | | 25.1 |
41 | | Aries | | 6,492 | | 2004 | | February 2021 | | 11.8 | | 11.2 |
42 | | Argus | | 6,492 | | 2004 | | March 2021 | | 11.5 | | 11.0 |
43 | | Porto Germeno ** | | 5,908 | | 2002 | | June 2021 | | 30.2 | | 27.0 |
44 | | Glen Canyon | | 5,642 | | 2006 | | March 2021 | | 11.8 | | 11.5 |
45 | | Porto Kagio ** | | 5,570 | | 2002 | | June 2021 | | 30.7 | | 27.5 |
46 | | Leonidio | | 4,957 | | 2014 | | May 2017 | | 16.7 | | 18.7 |
47 | | Kyparissia | | 4,957 | | 2014 | | May 2017 | | 16.7 | | 18.4 |
48 | | Megalopolis | | 4,957 | | 2013 | | July 2018 | | 21.8 | | 21.0 |
49 | | Marathopolis | | 4,957 | | 2013 | | July 2018 | | 22.5 | | 21.7 |
50 | | Gialova ** | | 4,578 | | 2009 | | August 2021 | | 18.4 | | 18.8 |
51 | | Dyros ** | | 4,578 | | 2008 | | January 2022 | | 18.3 | | 17.5 |
52 | | Norfolk ** | | 4,259 | | 2009 | | May 2021 | | 24.4 | | 24.6 |
53 | | Vulpecula | | 4,258 | | 2010 | | December 2019 | | 21.7 | | 10.7 |
54 | | Volans | | 4,258 | | 2010 | | December 2019 | | 10.1 | | 9.9 |
55 | | Virgo | | 4,258 | | 2009 | | January 2020 | | 9.7 | | 13.1 |
56 | | Vela | | 4,258 | | 2009 | | December 2019 | | 20.7 | | 8.9 |
57 | | Androusa ** | | 4,256 | | 2010 | | April 2021 | | 19.5 | | 18.6 |
58 | | Neokastro | | 4,178 | | 2011 | | December 2020 | | 9.8 | | 9.4 |
59 | | Ulsan | | 4,132 | | 2002 | | February 2012 | | 18.4 | | 16.5 |
60 | | Polar Brasil** | | 3,800 | | 2018 | | June 2023 | | 39.2 | | 37.8 |
61 | | Lakonia | | 2,586 | | 2004 | | December 2014 | | 6.7 | | 8.5 |
62 | | Scorpius | | 2,572 | | 2007 | | September 2020 | | 6.0 | | 5.5 |
63 | | Etoile | | 2,556 | | 2005 | | November 2017 | | 8.4 | | 7.9 |
64 | | Areopolis | | 2,474 | | 2000 | | May 2014 | | 5.8 | | 5.2 |
65 | | Arkadia | | 1,550 | | 2001 | | December 2023 | | 5.0 | | 4.7 |
66 | | Michigan | | 1,300 | | 2008 | | April 2018 | | 7.1 | | 6.6 |
67 | | Trader | | 1,300 | | 2008 | | April 2018 | | 7.0 | | 6.4 |
68 | | Luebeck | | 1,078 | | 2001 | | August 2012 | | 3.9 | | 3.5 |
| | | | | | | | TOTAL | | 2,967.9 | | 2,825.2 |
(1) | For impairment test calculation, Carrying Value includes the unamortized balance of dry-docking cost as at December 31, 2023 and 2024. |
* | Indicates container vessel which we believe, as of December 31, 2024, may have had fair value below its carrying value. As of December 31, 2024, we believe that the carrying value of this vessel was $3.3 million more than its market value. |
** | Indicates container vessels which we believe, as of December 31, 2023, may have had fair values below their carrying values. As of December 31, 2023, we believe that the aggregate carrying value of these 12 vessels was $39.1 million more than their market value. |
Dry Bulk Fleet
| | | | | | | | | | Carrying Value December 31, 2023 ($ US Million)(1) | | Carrying Value December 31, 2024 ($ US Million)(1) |
1 | | Frontier * | | 181,415 | | 2012 | | July 2024 | | - | | 34.2 |
2 | | Miracle | | 180,643 | | 2011 | | February 2024 | | - | | 26.1 |
3 | | Prosper | | 179,895 | | 2012 | | June 2024 | | - | | 29.7 |
4 | | Dorado | | 179,842 | | 2011 | | August 2023 | | 23.2 | | 25.9 |
5 | | Magnes | | 179,546 | | 2011 | | November 2024 | | - | | 30.2 |
6 | | Enna | | 175,975 | | 2011 | | August 2023 | | 21.9 | | 24.9 |
7 | | Aeolian | | 83,478 | | 2012 | | August 2021 | | 20.5 | | 18.8 |
8 | | Greneta | | 82,166 | | 2010 | | December 2021 | | 18.0 | | 16.7 |
9 | | Hydrus | | 81,601 | | 2011 | | December 2021 | | 16.8 | | 16.0 |
10 | | Phoenix | | 81,569 | | 2012 | | December 2021 | | 19.2 | | 18.0 |
11 | | Builder *,** | | 81,541 | | 2012 | | June 2021 | | 20.8 | | 19.5 |
12 | | Farmer *,** | | 81,541 | | 2012 | | September 2021 | | 20.9 | | 19.6 |
13 | | Sauvan | | 79,700 | | 2010 | | July 2021 | | 14.5 | | 13.6 |
14 | | Rose *,** | | 76,619 | | 2008 | | October 2021 | | 17.2 | | 15.6 |
15 | | Merchia | | 63,585 | | 2015 | | December 2021 | | 21.4 | | 20.5 |
16 | | Dawn | | 63,561 | | 2018 | | July 2021 | | 21.7 | | 21.7 |
17 | | Seabird | | 63,553 | | 2016 | | July 2021 | | 19.9 | | 18.8 |
18 | | Orion | | 63,473 | | 2015 | | November 2021 | | 21.4 | | 20.4 |
19 | | Damon | | 63,301 | | 2012 | | December 2021 | | 20.9 | | 19.5 |
20 | | Arya | | 61,424 | | 2013 | | September 2023 | | 19.7 | | 19.9 |
21 | | Alwine | | 61,090 | | 2014 | | November 2024 | | - | | 24.0 |
22 | | August | | 61,090 | | 2015 | | December 2024 | | - | | 25.2 |
23 | | Titan I (2) | | 58,090 | | 2009 | | November 2021 | | 14.2 | | - |
24 | | Athena | | 58,018 | | 2012 | | September 2021 | | 15.1 | | 14.1 |
25 | | Eracle | | 58,018 | | 2012 | | July 2021 | | 15.3 | | 14.2 |
26 | | Pythias*,** | | 58,018 | | 2010 | | December 2021 | | 15.4 | | 14.3 |
27 | | Norma** | | 58,018 | | 2010 | | March 2022 | | 15.0 | | 14.0 |
28 | | Oracle(2),** | | 57,970 | | 2009 | | January 2022 | | 15.1 | | - |
29 | | Uruguay | | 57,937 | | 2011 | | September 2021 | | 16.1 | | 15.1 |
30 | | Curacao | | 57,937 | | 2011 | | October 2021 | | 16.2 | | 15.1 |
31 | | Serena** | | 57,266 | | 2010 | | August 2021 | | 13.7 | | 12.8 |
32 | | Pegasus(2),** | | 56,726 | | 2011 | | June 2021 | | 14.0 | | - |
33 | | Libra*,** | | 56,701 | | 2010 | | January 2022 | | 15.0 | | 13.8 |
| | | | | | | | | | Carrying Value December 31, 2023 ($ US Million)(1) | | Carrying Value
December 31, 2024 ($ US Million)(1) |
34 | | Merida(2),** | | 56,670 | | 2012 | | August 2021 | | 14.7 | | - |
31 | | Clara | | 56,557 | | 2008 | | August 2021 | | 13.8 | | 12.4 |
35 | | Bermondi | | 55,469 | | 2009 | | October 2021 | | 14.8 | | 14.6 |
36 | | Verity | | 37,163 | | 2012 | | July 2021 | | 13.6 | | 12.6 |
37 | | Parity | | 37,152 | | 2012 | | September 2021 | | 13.9 | | 12.9 |
38 | | Acuity | | 37,152 | | 2011 | | July 2021 | | 12.5 | | 11.6 |
39 | | Equity** | | 37,071 | | 2013 | | October 2021 | | 15.1 | | 14.0 |
40 | | Discovery(2) | | 37,019 | | 2012 | | July 2021 | | 13.8 | | - |
41 | | Bernis | | 35,995 | | 2011 | | July 2021 | | 11.8 | | 11.1 |
42 | | Alliance(2) | | 33,751 | | 2012 | | July 2021 | | 10.2 | | - |
43 | | Resource | | 31,775 | | 2010 | | September 2021 | | 10.3 | | 9.6 |
| | | | | | | | TOTAL | | 627.6 | | 691.0 |
(1) | For impairment test calculation, Carrying Value includes the unamortized balance of dry-docking cost as at December 31, 2023 and 2024. |
* | Indicates dry bulk vessels which we believe, as of December 31, 2024, may have had fair values below their carrying values. As of December 31, 2024, we believe that the aggregate carrying value of these six vessels was $8.0 million more than their aggregate market value. |
** | Indicates dry bulk vessels which we believe, as of December 31, 2023, may have had fair values below their carrying values. As of December 31, 2023, we believe that the aggregate carrying value of these nine vessels was $12.7 million more than their aggregate market value. |
Vessels are stated at cost, which consists of the contract price and any material expenses incurred upon acquisition (initial repairs, improvements and delivery expenses, interest and on-site supervision costs incurred during the construction periods). Subsequent expenditures for conversions and major improvements are also capitalized when they appreciably extend the life, increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety of the vessels.
Vessel Lives and Depreciation
We depreciate our vessels based on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic lives assigned to each vessel, which is currently 30 years from the date of their initial delivery from the shipyard for containerships and 25 years from the date of their initial delivery for dry bulk vessels, which we believe is within industry standards and represents the most reasonable useful life for each of our vessels. Depreciation is based on the cost of the vessel less its estimated residual value which is equal to the product of vessels’ lightweight tonnage and estimated scrap rate ($300 per lightweight ton). Secondhand vessels are depreciated from the date of their acquisition through their remaining estimated useful lives. A decrease in the residual value of the Company’s vessels or a decrease in the estimated economic lives assigned to the Company’s vessels due to unforeseen events (such as an extended period of weak markets, the broad imposition of age restrictions by the Company’s customers, new regulations, or other future events) which could result in a reduction of the estimated useful lives of any affected vessels may lead to higher depreciation charges and/or impairment losses in future periods for the affected vessels. We examine the prospect and the timing of each vessel sale for demolition opportunistically and on a case by case basis. The decision to sell a specific vessel for demolition depends on the prospects of the vessel to secure employment, the estimated cost of maintaining the vessel, the available financing and the price of scrap.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are primarily generated from time charter or voyage charter agreements.
Time charter agreements contain a lease as they meet the criteria of a lease under ASC 842. Time charter agreements contain a minimum non-cancellable period and an extension period at the option of the charterer. Each lease term is assessed at the inception of that lease. Time charter revenues are recognized over the term of the charter as service is provided, when they become fixed and determinable. Revenues from time charter agreements providing for varying annual rates are accounted for as operating leases and thus recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable rental periods of such agreements, as service is performed. Revenue generated from variable lease payments is recognized in the period when changes in the facts and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur. Unearned revenue includes cash received prior to the balance sheet date for which all criteria to recognize as revenue have not been met, including any unearned revenue resulting from charter agreements providing for varying annual rates, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis. Unearned revenue also includes the unamortized balance of the liability associated with the acquisition of secondhand vessels with time charters attached that were acquired at values below fair market value at the date the acquisition agreement is consummated.
Under Voyage charter agreements, a vessel is provided for the transportation of specific goods between specific ports in return for payment of an agreed upon freight per ton of cargo. We have determined that our voyage charter agreements do not contain a lease because the charterer under such contracts does not have the right to control the use of the vessel since we, as the ship-owner, retain control over the operations of the vessel, provided also that the terms of the voyage charter are pre-determined, and any change requires our consent and are therefore considered service contracts that fall under the provisions of ASC 606 “Revenue from contracts with customers”. We account for a voyage charter when all the following criteria are met: (i) the parties to the contract have approved the contract in the form of a written charter agreement or fixture recap and are committed to perform their respective obligations, (ii) we can identify each party’s rights regarding the services to be transferred, (iii) we can identify the payment terms for the services to be transferred, (iv) the charter agreement has commercial substance (that is, the risk, timing, or amount of the future cash flows is expected to change as a result of the contract) and (v) it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the services that will be transferred to the charterer. The majority of revenue from voyage charter agreements is collected in advance. We have determined that there is one single performance obligation for each of our voyage contracts, which is to provide the charterer with an integrated transportation service within a specified time period. We are also engaged in contracts of affreightment which are contracts for multiple voyage charter employments. In addition, we have concluded that revenues from voyage charters in the spot market or under contracts of affreightment are recognized ratably over time because the charterer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of our performance as we perform. Therefore, since our performance obligation under each voyage contract is met evenly as the voyage progresses, revenue is recognized on a straight line basis over the voyage days from the loading of cargo to its discharge.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
ITEM 6. | DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES |
A. | Directors and Senior Management |
The following table sets forth information regarding our directors and executive officers. The business address of each of our executive officers and directors listed below is 7 rue du Gabian, MC 98000 Monaco. Our telephone number at that address is +377 93 25 09 40. Our board of directors will be elected annually on a staggered basis, and each elected director will hold office for a three-year term. The following directors have been determined by our board of directors to be independent under the standards of the NYSE and the rules and regulations of the SEC: Vagn Lehd Møller and Charlotte Stratos. Officers are elected from time to time by vote of our board of directors and hold office until a successor is elected and qualified.
| | | | |
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos | | 55 | | Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Class III Director |
Gregory Zikos | | 56 | | Chief Financial Officer and Class II Director |
Vagn Lehd Møller | | 78 | | Class II Director |
Charlotte Stratos | | 70 | | Class III Director |
Konstantinos Zacharatos | | 52 | | Class I Director |
Anastassios Gabrielides | | 60 | | General Counsel and Secretary |
The term of our Class III directors expires in 2025, the term of our Class I director expires in 2026 and term of our Class II directors expires in 2027.
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos is our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors. Mr. Konstantakopoulos also serves as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Costamare Shipping, our manager, which he wholly owns. He also controls, together with a member of his family, Costamare Services, a service provider to our vessel-owning subsidiaries. Mr. Konstantakopoulos owns 50% of Blue Net and Blue Net Asia which provide chartering brokerage services to our as well as to third-party vessels. Mr. Konstantakopoulos has served on the board of directors of the Union of Greek Shipowners since 2006. Mr. Konstantakopoulos studied engineering at Université Paul Sabatier in France.
Gregory Zikos is our Chief Financial Officer and a member of our board of directors. Prior to joining us in 2007, Mr. Zikos was employed at DryShips, Inc., a public shipping company, as the Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2007. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Zikos was employed with J&P Avax S.A., a real estate investment and construction company, where he was responsible for project and structured finance debt transactions. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Zikos was employed at Citigroup (London), global corporate and investment banking group, where he was involved in numerous European leveraged and acquisition debt financing transactions. Mr. Zikos practiced law from 1994 to 1998, during which time he advised financial institutions and shipping companies in debt and acquisition transactions. Mr. Zikos holds an M.B.A. in finance from Cornell University, an LL.M. from the University of London King’s College, and a bachelor of laws, with merits, from the University of Athens.
Vagn Lehd Møller is a member of our board of directors. From 1963 to 2007, Mr. Møller worked with A.P. Møller-Maersk A/S where he eventually served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of the world’s largest liner company, Maersk Line. Mr. Møller was instrumental in the purchase and integration of Sea-land Services by A.P. Møller-Maersk A/S in 2000 and of P&O Nedlloyd in 2005. Mr. Møller served as a member of the board of directors (2011-2015) and chairman (2012-2015) of Scan Global Logistics A/S, a Danish based internal logistics company. He served as member of the board of directors and chairman of ZITON A/S (2012-2021) and Jack-up InvestCo 2 A/S (2012-2021) and as a member of the board of directors of Jack-up InvestCo 3 Plc. (2012-2021), all being companies investing in jack-up vessels chartered to off-shore windmill companies. Mr. Møller has also served as chairman of the board of Navadan A/S (2011-2023), a Danish company supplying tank cleaning systems, and as chairman of the board of The Survey Association A/S (2015-2024), a Danish based marine surveyor company.
Charlotte Stratos is a member of our board of directors. From 2008 to 2020, Ms. Stratos served as a Senior Advisor to Morgan Stanley’s Investment Banking Division-Global Transportation team. From 1987 to 2007, she served as Managing Director and Head of Global Greek Shipping for Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank of the Credit Agricole Group. From 1976 to 1987, Ms. Stratos served in various positions with Bankers Trust Company, as Vice President to the Shipping Department involved exclusively with ship finance to Greek shipping companies, based in New York, London and Piraeus. From 2007 to 2016, she was an independent director of Hellenic Carriers Ltd. a shipping company listed on London’s AIM. From 2006 to 2008, she served at the board of Emporiki Bank. Ms. Stratos is currently an independent director of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp., a tanker company listed on the NYSE and on the Oslo Stock Exchange.
Konstantinos Zacharatos is a member of our board of directors. Mr. Zacharatos served as our General Counsel and Secretary until April 2013. Mr. Zacharatos has also served as the Vice Chairman of Shanghai Costamare since its incorporation in 2005. Mr. Zacharatos joined Costamare Shipping in 2000, became a member of the board of directors of Costamare Shipping in June 2010 and has also been responsible for the legal affairs of Costamare Shipping, Costamare Services, CIEL, Shanghai Costamare and C-Man Maritime. Mr. Zacharatos has previously been the legal adviser of Costaterra S.A., a Greek property company. Prior to joining Costamare Shipping and Costaterra S.A., Mr. Zacharatos was employed with Pagoropoulos & Associates, a law firm. Mr. Zacharatos holds an LL.M. and an LL.B. from the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Anastassios Gabrielides is our General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Gabrielides has served as a director and secretary of Costamare Services since May 2013. From 2004 to 2011, Mr. Gabrielides served at the Hellenic Capital Markets Commission, the Greek securities regulator, first as Vice Chairman (2004 to 2009) and then as Chairman (2009 to 2011). Mr. Gabrielides also worked for the Alexander S. Onassis Foundation from 1991 to 1999 in various posts and was a member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Gabrielides has been a member of the board of supervisors of the European Securities and Markets Authority and has been a member of the Greek Financial Intelligence Unit. Mr. Gabrielides holds LL.M. degrees from Harvard Law School and the London School of Economics, a law degree from Athens University Law School, and a B.A. in economics from the American College of Greece, Deree College.
B. | Compensation of Directors and Senior Management |
Our independent non-executive directors receive annual fees in the amount of $80,000, plus reimbursement for their out-of-pocket expenses. Our non-independent directors do not receive compensation for their service as directors. We do not have any service contracts with our non-executive directors that provide for benefits upon termination of their services.
We have three shore-based officers, our chairman and chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our general counsel and secretary. We do not pay any compensation to our officers for their services as officers. Our officers are employed and are compensated for their services by Costamare Shipping and/or Costamare Services. Our chief financial officer and a non-independent board member are also employed and compensated by Costamare Bulkers and were paid aggregate cash compensation of $506,801 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.
We have five members on our board of directors. The board of directors may change the number of directors to not less than three, nor more than 15, by a vote of a majority of the entire board. Each director shall be elected to serve until the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, except in the event of death, resignation or removal. A vacancy on the board created by death, resignation, removal (which may only be for cause), or failure of the stockholders to elect the entire class of directors to be elected at any election of directors or for any other reason, may be filled only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, at any special meeting called for that purpose or at any regular meeting of the board of directors.
We are a “foreign private issuer” under the securities laws of the United States and the rules of the NYSE. Under the securities laws of the United States, “foreign private issuers” are subject to different disclosure requirements than U.S. domiciled registrants, as well as different financial reporting requirements. Under the NYSE rules, a “foreign private issuer” is subject to less stringent corporate governance requirements. Subject to certain exceptions, the rules of the NYSE permit a “foreign private issuer” to follow its home country practice in lieu of the listing requirements of the NYSE. As permitted by such exemption, as well as by our bylaws and the laws of the Marshall Islands, we currently have a board of directors with a majority of non-independent directors and a combined corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee with one non-independent director serving as a committee member. As a result, non-independent directors, including members of our management who also serve on our board of directors, may, among other things, fix the compensation of our management, make stock and option awards and resolve governance issues regarding our company. In addition, we currently have an audit committee composed solely of two independent committee members, whereas a domestic public company would be required to have three such independent members. Accordingly, in the future you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.
Corporate Governance
The board of directors and our Company’s management engage in an ongoing review of our corporate governance practices in order to oversee our compliance with the applicable corporate governance rules of the NYSE and the SEC.
We have adopted a number of key documents that are the foundation of the Company’s corporate governance, including:
| • | a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all officers and employees, which incorporates a Code of Ethics for directors and a Code of Conduct for corporate officers; |
| • | a Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee Charter; and |
| • | an Audit Committee Charter. |
These documents and other important information on our governance are posted on our website and may be viewed at http//www.costamare.com. The information contained on or connected to our website is not part of this annual report. We will also provide a paper copy of any of these documents upon the written request of a stockholder. Stockholders may direct their requests to the attention of our Secretary, Anastassios Gabrielides, 7 rue du Gabian, MC 98000 Monaco.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of Vagn Lehd Møller and Charlotte Stratos. Ms. Stratos is the chairperson of the committee. The audit committee is responsible for:
| • | the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of independent auditors and approving any non-audit services performed by such auditors; |
| • | assisting the board in monitoring the integrity of our financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of the independent accountants and our internal audit function and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; |
| • | annually reviewing an independent auditors’ report describing the auditing firm’s internal quality-control procedures, and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, of the auditing firm; |
| • | discussing the annual audited financial and quarterly statements with management and the independent auditors; |
| • | discussing earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies; |
| • | discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; |
| • | meeting separately, and periodically, with management, internal auditors and the independent auditors; |
| • | reviewing with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties and management’s responses; |
| • | setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors; |
| • | annually reviewing the adequacy of the audit committee’s written charter, the scope of the annual internal audit plan and the results of internal audits; |
| • | establishing procedures for the consideration of all related-party transactions, including matters involving potential conflicts of interest or potential usurpations of corporate opportunities; |
| • | reporting regularly to the full board of directors; and |
| • | handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the audit committee by the board of directors from time to time. |
Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee
Our corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee consists of Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, Vagn Lehd Møller and Charlotte Stratos. Mr. Konstantakopoulos is the chairman of the committee. The corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee is responsible for:
| • | nominating candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the full board of directors, for the approval of the full board of directors to fill board vacancies as and when they arise, as well as putting in place plans for succession, in particular, of the chairman of the board of directors and executive officers; |
| • | selecting, or recommending that the full board of directors select, the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders; |
| • | developing and recommending to the full board of directors corporate governance guidelines applicable to us and keeping such guidelines under review; |
| • | overseeing the evaluation of the board and management; and |
| • | handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee by the board of directors from time to time. |
For each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024, we had three shore-based officers, our chairman and chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our general counsel and secretary. We did not pay any compensation to our officers for their services as officers. Our officers were employed by and received compensation for their services from Costamare Shipping and/or Costamare Services. As of December 31, 2024, our chief financial officer and another non-independent director were also employed by and received compensation from Costamare Bulkers.
As of December 31, 2024, Costamare Shipping, Costamare Services, Costamare Bulkers, the Agency Companies and the Neptune Manager in aggregate employed approximately 290 shore-based employees. Approximately 2,430 seafarers were serving on our vessels. Our managers are responsible for recruiting, either directly or through manning agents, the officers and crew for our containerships and dry bulk vessels that they manage. We believe the streamlining of crewing arrangements through our managers allows all of our vessels to be crewed with experienced crews that have the qualifications and licenses required by international regulations and shipping conventions. We have not experienced any material work stoppages due to labor disagreements during the past three years. As of December 31, 2023, our chief financial officer and another non-independent director were also employed by and received compensation from Costamare Bulkers. As of December 31, 2023, Costamare Shipping, Costamare Services, Costamare Bulkers, the Agency Companies and the Neptune Manager in aggregate employed approximately 270 shore-based employees. Approximately 2,500 seafarers were serving on our vessels. As of December 31, 2022, our chief financial officer was also employed by and received compensation for his services from Costamare Bulkers. As of December 31, 2022, Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services employed approximately 160 shore-based employees in total and approximately 2,700 seafarers were serving on our vessels, including vessels acquired under the Framework Deed. As of December 31, 2022, Costamare Bulkers had three shore-based employees, of which one was also employed by Costamare Services.
The common stock beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers and/or entities affiliated with these individuals is disclosed in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders” below.
Equity Compensation Plans
We have not adopted any equity compensation plans.
ITEM 7. | MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
The following table and the footnotes below set forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock and Preferred Stock as of February 12, 2025 held by:
| • | each person or entity that we know beneficially owns 5% or more of our common stock; |
| • | each of our officers and directors; and |
| • | all our directors and officers as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. In general, a person who has voting power or investment power with respect to securities is treated as a beneficial owner of those securities.
Beneficial ownership does not necessarily imply that the named person has the economic or other benefits of ownership. For purposes of this table, shares subject to options, warrants or rights or shares exercisable within 60 days of February 12, 2025 are considered as beneficially owned by the person holding those options, warrants or rights. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share held. The applicable percentage of ownership of each stockholder is based on 119,961,489 shares of common stock, 1,970,649 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 3,973,135 Series C Preferred Stock and 3,986,542 Series D Preferred Stock outstanding as of February 12, 2025. Information for certain holders is based on their latest filings with the SEC or information delivered to us. Except as noted below, the address of all stockholders, officers and directors identified in the table and the accompanying footnotes below is in care of our principal executive offices.
| | Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Held | |
| | | | | | |
Identity of Person or Group | | | | | | |
Officers and Directors | | | | | | |
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos(1) | | | 34,593,548 | | | | 28.8 | % |
Gregory Zikos | | | * | | | | | |
Konstantinos Zacharatos(2) | | | * | | | | | |
Vagn Lehd Møller | | | * | | | | | |
Charlotte Stratos | | | — | | | | | |
Anastassios Gabrielides(3) | | | — | | | | | |
All officers and directors as a group (six persons) | | | 34,764,473 | | | | 29.0 | % |
5% Beneficial Owners | | | | | | | | |
Achillefs Konstantakopoulos(4) | | | 22,567,737 | | | | 18.8 | % |
Christos Konstantakopoulos(5) | | | 19,051,588 | | | | 15.9 | % |
(1) | Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, our chairman and chief executive officer, owns 13,973,469 shares of common stock directly and 20,620,079 shares of common stock indirectly through entities he controls. He also holds 12,800 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 23,003 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and 50,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock through an entity he controls, 0.6%, 0.6% and 1.3%, respectively, of the issued and outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock, respectively. He also held 5.7% of the issued and outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock as of July 15, 2024, when the Company completed the full redemption of all of its 4,574,100 outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock. |
(2) | Konstantinos Zacharatos holds less than 1% of our issued and outstanding Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock. |
(3) | Anastassios Gabrielides, our General Counsel and Secretary, holds less than 1% of our issued and outstanding Series D Preferred Stock. |
(4) | Achillefs Konstantakopoulos, the brother of our chairman and chief executive officer, owns 18,407,585 shares of common stock directly and 3,380,152 shares of common stock indirectly through entities he controls and his immediate family owns 780,000 shares of common stock. He also holds 30,203 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 80,390 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and 102,300 shares of Series D Preferred Stock through an entity he controls, or 1.5%, 2.0% and 2.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock, respectively. His immediate family also holds 31,350 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and 4,400 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, or 1.6% and 0.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, respectively. |
(5) | Christos Konstantakopoulos, the brother of our chairman and chief executive officer, owns 19,051,588 shares of common stock directly. |
* | Owns less than 1% of our issued and outstanding common stock. |
In November 2010, we completed a registered public offering of our shares of common stock and our common stock began trading on the NYSE. Our major stockholders have the same voting rights as our other stockholders. As of February 12, 2025, we had approximately 22,371 beneficial owners of our common stock.
Holders of our Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights except (1) in respect of amendments to the Articles of Incorporation which would adversely alter the preferences, powers or rights of the Preferred Stock or (2) in the event that the Company proposes to issue any parity stock if the cumulative dividends payable on outstanding Preferred Stock are in arrears or any senior stock. However, whenever dividends payable on the Preferred Stock are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, holders of Preferred Stock (voting together as a class with all other classes or series of parity stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will be entitled to elect one additional director to serve on our board of directors until such time as all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Preferred Stock have been paid in full.
B. | Related Party Transactions |
Management Affiliations
Each of our containerships and dry bulk vessels is currently managed by Costamare Shipping, which may subcontract certain services to other affiliated managers, or to V.Ships Greece or, subject to our consent, other third-party managers, pursuant to the Framework Agreement and one or more ship-management agreements between the relevant vessel-owning subsidiary and the relevant manager. Costamare Shipping, itself or together with our sub-managers provides our fleet with technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase, accounting and, insurance services pursuant to separate ship-management agreements between each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries and Costamare Shipping and, in certain cases, the relevant sub-manager. Navilands, one of the sub-managers, may subcontract certain services to and enter into a relevant sub-management agreement with Navilands (Shanghai). Costamare Services provides our vessel-owning subsidiaries with chartering, sale and purchase, insurance and certain representation and administrative services pursuant to the Services Agreement. The Agency Companies provide chartering and other services to Costamare Bulkers. The Neptune Manager provides to Neptune administrative, strategic, accounting and tax as well as insurance arrangements. Furthermore, the Neptune Manager provides vessel related services with respect to vessels being financed or to be financed by Neptune. Costamare Shipping, Local Agency A, Local Agency B, Local Agency D and the Neptune Manager are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer. Local Agency C is controlled by our chief financial officer, Gregory Zikos. Costamare Services is controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer and a member of his family. In addition, Blue Net and Blue Net Asia, charter brokerage companies which are 50% owned by our chairman and chief executive officer, provides brokerage services to our containership vessels.
Management and Services Agreements
On November 2, 2015, we entered into the Framework Agreement with Costamare Shipping as most recently amended and restated on June 28, 2021 and as further amended on December 12, 2024. On November 2, 2015 our vessel-owning subsidiaries entered into the Services Agreement with Costamare Services as amended and restated on June 28, 2021 and as further amended on December 12, 2024.
Costamare Shipping is the manager for our containerships and dry bulk vessels, and provides us with commercial, technical and other services pursuant to the Framework Agreement and to separate ship management agreements with the relevant vessel-owning subsidiaries. As of February 12, 2025, Costamare Shipping, itself or together with V.Ships Greece or, subject to our consent, other sub-managers, provides our fleet of containerships and dry bulk vessels with technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase, accounting and insurance services pursuant to separate ship-management agreements between each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries and Costamare Shipping and, in certain cases, the relevant sub-manager. As of February 12, 2025, Costamare Services provides our vessel-owning subsidiaries with chartering, sale and purchase, insurance and certain representation and administrative services pursuant to the Services Agreement. As of February 12, 2025, Navilands and Navilands (Shanghai) provide to certain of our vessel owning subsidiaries technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase, accounting and insurance services pursuant to separate ship-management agreements between each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries and Navilands and Navilands (Shanghai). Navilands and Navilands (Shanghai) provide services to us as submanagers of Costamare Shipping under the Framework Agreement and as such, the fee received by Costamare Shipping pursuant to the Framework Agreement will be reduced by any fees that we pay pursuant to the management agreements with Navilands and Navilands (Shanghai). Our managers and sub-managers are responsible for recruiting, either directly or through manning agents, the officers and crew for our containerships that they manage.
Reporting Structure
Our chairman and chief executive officer and our chief financial officer supervise, in conjunction with our board of directors, the management of our operations and the provision of services to our fleet by Costamare Shipping, Costamare Services, as well as any sub-managers, including V.Ships Greece, Navilands, Navilands (Shanghai), Vinnen, HanseContor or FML. Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services report to us and our board of directors through our chairman and chief executive officer and chief financial officer, each of which is appointed by our board of directors.
Compensation of Our Manager and Services Provider
Costamare Shipping provides us with commercial, technical and other services including technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, sale and purchase, accounting and insurance services in respect of our vessels. Costamare Services provides our vessel-owning subsidiaries with chartering, sale and purchase, insurance and certain representation and administrative services pursuant to the Services Agreement.
In the event that Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services decide to delegate certain or all of the services they have agreed to perform under the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement, respectively, either through (i) subcontracting to a sub-manager or sub-provider or (ii) by directing such sub-manager or sub-provider to enter into a direct agreement with the relevant vessel-owning subsidiary, then, in the case of subcontracting under (i), Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, will be responsible for paying the fee charged by the relevant sub-manager or sub-provider for providing such services and, in the case of a direct agreement under (ii), the fee received by Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, will be reduced by the fee payable to the sub-manager or sub-provider under the relevant direct agreement. As a result, these arrangements will not result in any increase in the aggregate management fees and services fees that we pay. In addition to management fees, we pay for any capital expenditures, financial costs, operating expenses and any general and administrative expenses, including payments to third parties, including specialist providers, in accordance with the Framework Agreement and the relevant separate ship-management agreements or supervision agreements.
Costamare Shipping received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of $1,020 per day pro-rated for the calendar days we own each vessel. This fee is reduced to $510 per day in the case of any vessel subject to a bareboat charter. We will also pay to Costamare Shipping a flat fee of $839,988 per newbuild vessel for the supervision of the construction of any newbuild vessel that we may contract. Costamare Shipping received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of 0.15% on all gross freight, demurrage, charter hire and ballast bonus or other income earned with respect to each vessel in our fleet. Costamare Services received in 2024 and 2023 a fee of 1.10%, on all gross freight, demurrage, charter hire and ballast bonus or other income earned with respect to each vessel in our fleet and a quarterly fee of (i) $666,737 and (ii) an amount equal to the value of 149,600 shares, based on the average closing price of our common stock on the NYSE for the 10 days ending on the 30th day of the last month of each quarter; provided that Costamare Services may elect to receive 149,600 shares instead of the fee under (ii). We have reserved a number of shares of common stock to cover the fees to be paid to Costamare Services under (ii) through December 31, 2025. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services charged aggregate fees of $64.6 million and $63.7 million, respectively, including $10.5 million and $14.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, charged by third-party managers. The fees include the value of the 598,400 shares we issued within each year pursuant to the Services Agreement, to Costamare Services. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2024, Costamare Shipping charged, in aggregate, to the vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, $1.7 million for services provided in accordance with the relevant agreements, including $0.8 million charged by third-party managers. Furthermore, during the year December 31, 2023, Costamare Shipping charged, in aggregate, to the companies established pursuant to the Framework Deed and to the vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, $3.0 million, for services provided in accordance with the relevant agreements, including $0.9 million charged by third-party managers.
Term and Termination Rights
Subject to the termination rights described below, on December 31, 2024, the terms of the Framework Agreement and the Services Agreement automatically renewed for another one-year period, and will automatically renew for ten more consecutive one-year period until December 31, 2035. In addition to the termination provisions outlined below, we are able to terminate the Framework Agreement and Service Agreement, subject to a termination fee, by providing 12 months’ written notice to Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, that we wish to terminate the applicable agreement at the end of the then-current term.
Our Manager’s Termination Rights. Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services may terminate the Framework Agreement or Services Agreement, respectively, prior to the end of its term if:
| • | any moneys payable by us under the applicable agreement have not been paid when due or if on demand within 20 business days of payment having been demanded; |
| • | if we materially breach the agreement and we have failed to cure such breach within 20 business days after we are given written notice from Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable; or |
| • | there is a change of control of our Company or the vessel-owning subsidiaries, as applicable. |
Our Termination Rights. We or our vessel-owning subsidiaries may terminate the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement, respectively, prior to the end of its term in the following circumstances:
| • | any moneys payable by Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services under or pursuant to the applicable agreement are not paid or accounted for within 10 business days after receiving written notice from us; |
| • | Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable materially breaches the agreement and has failed to cure such breach within 20 business days after receiving written notice from us; |
| • | there is a change of control of Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable; or |
| • | Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, is convicted of, enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendere with respect to, or enters into a plea bargain or settlement admitting guilt for a crime (including fraud), which conviction, plea bargain or settlement is demonstrably and materially injurious to Costamare, if such crime is not a misdemeanor and such crime has been committed solely and directly by an officer or director of Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, acting within the terms of its employment or office. |
Mutual Termination Rights. Either we or Costamare Shipping may terminate the Framework Agreement, and either Costamare Services or our vessel-owning subsidiaries may terminate the Services Agreement if:
| • | the other party ceases to conduct business, or all or substantially all of the equity interests, properties or assets of the other party are sold, seized or appropriated which, in the case of seizure or appropriation, is not discharged within 20 business days; |
| • | the other party files a petition under any bankruptcy law, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, seeks relief under any law for the protection of debtors or adopts a plan of liquidation, or if a petition is filed against such party seeking to have it declared insolvent or bankrupt and such petition is not dismissed or stayed within 90 business days of its filing, or such party admits in writing its insolvency or its inability to pay its debts as they mature, or if an order is made for the appointment of a liquidator, manager, receiver or trustee of such party of all or a substantial part of its assets, or if an encumbrancer takes possession of or a receiver or trustee is appointed over the whole or any part of such party’s undertaking, property or assets or if an order is made or a resolution is passed for Costamare Shipping’s, Costamare Services’ or our winding up; |
| • | the other party is prevented from performing any obligations under the applicable agreement by any cause whatsoever of any nature or kind beyond the reasonable control of such party respectively for a period of two consecutive months or more (“Force Majeure”); or |
| • | in the case of the Framework Agreement, all supervision agreements and all ship-management agreements are terminated in accordance with their respective terms. |
If Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services terminates the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement, as applicable, for any reason other than Force Majeure, or if we terminate either agreement pursuant to our ability to terminate with 12 months’ written notice, we will be obliged to pay to Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, a termination fee equal to (a) the number of full years remaining prior to December 31, 2035, times (b) the aggregate fees due and payable to Costamare Shipping or Costamare Services, as applicable, during the 12-month period ending on the date of termination (without taking into account any reduction in fees under the Framework Agreement to reflect that certain obligations have been delegated to a sub-manager); provided that the termination fee will always be at least two times the aggregate fees over the 12-month period described above. In addition, the separate ship-management agreements to which our vessels are subject may be terminated by either us or the applicable manager if the vessel is sold, becomes a total loss or is requisitioned.
Non-competition
Costamare Shipping has agreed that during the term of the Framework Agreement, and Costamare Services has agreed that during the term of the Services Agreement, they will not provide similar services to any entity other than our subsidiaries and to entities affiliated with our chairman and chief executive officer or members of his family, without our prior written approval, which we may provide under certain circumstances. We believe we will derive significant benefits from our exclusive relationship with Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services.
Costamare Shipping provides management services in respect of one container vessel, one dry bulk vessel and three offshore vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. Costamare Services provides post fixture services in respect of one container vessel partly owned by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos.
V.Ships Greece, HanseContor, FML, Vinnen, Navilands and Navilands (Shanghai) provide and/or may provide services to third parties.
Agency Agreements
Costamare Bulkers Inc. entered into separate Agency Agreements for the provision of chartering and/or cargo sourcing and/or research services with Local Agency A, Local Agency B and Local Agency C on November 14, 2022, and Local Agency D on November 20, 2023. On December 16, 2024, the Agency Agreements were most recently amended and restated such that each Local Agency can now provide its services to any dry bulk subsidiary of the Company, in addition to CBI. CBI may also charter out its vessels to Local Agency C. Local Agency A, Local Agency B and Local Agency D are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. Local Agency C is controlled by our chief financial officer, Gregory Zikos.
Term and Termination Rights
Under the agreements between Costamare Bulkers and each of the Agency Companies, Costamare Bulkers may terminate the agreement with the respective Agency Company, with immediate effect by notice, if such Agency Company (a) is subject to an insolvency event, (b) is a sanctioned person, (c) commits a material breach of the agreement that cannot be remedied or was not remedied in due time or (d) commits repeated breaches of the agreement so as to deprive Costamare Bulkers of the use or enjoyment of such Agency Companies’ services, or to cause business disruption or substantial inconvenience. In addition, Costamare Bulkers may also terminate the agreements in accordance with the force majeure clauses thereunder.
Fees
Under the agreements between Costamare Bulkers and each of the Agency Companies, Costamare Bulkers shall pay to each Agency Company, fees for the performance and provision of services by such Agency Company, calculated on the basis of (a) the cost base of the relevant Agency Company, plus (b) a mark up of 11% on the cost base of the relevant Agency Company, plus (c) any costs incurred by the relevant Agency Company (as paying agent only) on behalf of Costamare Bulkers in the performance and provision of such services.
In the year ended December 31, 2024, the Agency Companies received in aggregate a fee of $1.4 million provided in accordance with the respective Agency Agreements.
Tax Indemnity Deed
CBI also provides Local Agency C a tax indemnity in case of any tax disputes with local tax authorities relating to the characterization of the hire or freight revenue earned by Local Agency C on its charters as pass through payments.
Neptune Management Agreement
On March 15, 2023, our chairman and chief executive officer acquired 51% of the issued and outstanding capital of Neptune Manager which provides to Neptune administrative, strategic, accounting and tax as well as insurance arrangements and vessel related services in respect of vessels being financed or to be financed by Neptune. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company”.
Term and Termination Rights
Under the Neptune Management Agreement entered into between the Neptune Manager and Neptune:
| (a) | The Neptune Manager may terminate the Neptune Management Agreement with immediate effect by notice if: |
| (i) | any moneys payable by Neptune under the Neptune Management Agreement have not been received by the Neptune Manager within a certain time period from relevant request by the Neptune Manager; |
| (ii) | the Manager is required by Neptune to take any action that contravenes applicable law or is unduly hazardous or improper or hazardous to any crew member of any vessel financed or other person; or |
| (iii) | an insolvency event of Neptune occurs. |
| (b) | Neptune may terminate the Neptune Management Agreement with immediate effect by notice if a material breach by the Neptune Manager occurs in the performance of its obligations under the said agreement and such breach (if curable) is not cured within a certain period. |
Fees
In the year ended December 31, 2024, the Neptune Manager received 1.5% of the aggregate amount of all invested amount made through such year plus 0.8% of the aggregate amount of all undrawn commitments. In the year ended December 31, 2024, Neptune Manager charged an amount of $3.3 million in management fees.
NML Debt Financing
As of February 12, 2025, NML has committed to provide financing to a joint venture and related entities, subject to final documentation, in an amount up to $180 million in the form of sale and leaseback transactions. Our chairman and chief executive officer Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos and a member of his family hold equity interests of approximately 17% each in the joint venture.
Restrictive Covenant Agreements
On July 1, 2021, the restrictive covenant agreement we had entered into with Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos was amended and restated, and Mr. Konstantakopoulos agreed to similarly restrict his activities in the dry bulk sector under substantially the same terms as the existing agreement restricting his activities in the containership sector. Under the restrictive covenant agreements entered into with us, during the period of Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos’s and Konstantinos Zacharatos’s employment or service with us and for six months thereafter, each has agreed to restrictions on his ownership of any containerships and, in the case of Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, dry bulk vessels (the relevant vessels, the “covered vessels”) and on the acquisition of any shareholding in a business involved in the ownership of covered vessels (such activities are referred to here as “the restricted activities”), subject to the exceptions described below.
Each of Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos and Konstantinos Zacharatos is permitted to engage in the restricted activities in the following circumstances: (a) pursuant to his involvement with us, (b) with respect to certain permitted acquisitions (as described below) and (c) pursuant to his passive ownership of up to, in the case of Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, 19.99% of the outstanding voting securities of any publicly traded company, and in the case of Konstantinos Zacharatos, 20% of the outstanding voting securities of any publicly traded or private company, in each case that is engaged in the containership business.
As noted above, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos and Konstantinos Zacharatos are permitted to engage in restricted activities with respect to two types of permitted acquisitions, including: (1) the acquisition of a covered vessel or an acquisition or investment in a covered vessel business, on terms and conditions that are not materially more favorable, than those first offered to us and refused by an independent conflicts committee of our directors, and/or (2) the acquisition of a business that includes covered vessels. Under this second type of permitted acquisition, we must be given the opportunity to buy the covered vessel or covered vessel businesses included in the acquisition, in each case for its fair market value plus certain break-up costs.
Each of Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos and Konstantinos Zacharatos has also agreed that if one of our vessels and a covered vessel majority-owned by either of them are both available and meet the criteria for an available charter, our vessel will be offered such charter. Such priority chartering obligation applies, as of February 12, 2025, with respect to one containership and one dry bulk vessel owned or controlled by Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, but does not apply with respect to five containerships and one dry bulk vessel where Mr. Konstantakopoulos holds a passive interest, including one containership where one of our non-independent board members also holds a minority interest.
As of February 12, 2025, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, alone or in one instance with one of our non-independent board members, had an ownership interest in six containerships and two dry bulk vessels pursuant to waivers to or otherwise in compliance with the respective restrictive covenant agreement. We cannot rule out the possibility that additional such waivers will be granted by our Board of Directors in future periods.
Registration Rights Agreement
We entered into a registration rights agreement with the stockholders named therein (the “Registration Rights Holders”) on November 3, 2010, pursuant to which we granted the Registration Rights Holders and their transferees the right, under certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions to require us to register under the Securities Act shares of our common stock held by those persons. On November 27, 2015, the Company and the Registration Rights Holders entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement to extend registration rights to Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services, each of which have received or may receive shares of our common stock as fee compensation under the Group Management Agreements (prior to November 2, 2015) or under the Services Agreement. Under the registration rights agreement, the Registration Rights Holders and their transferees have the right to request us to register the sale of shares held by them on their behalf and may require us to make available shelf registration statements permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, those persons have the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights in connection with registered offerings initiated by us. The Registration Rights Holders own a total of approximately 73 million shares entitled to these registration rights.
Trademark License Agreement
Under the trademark license agreement entered into with us on November 3, 2010 as amended and restated on March 14, 2022, Costamare Shipping, one of our managers, has agreed to grant us a non-transferable, royalty free license and right to use the Costamare Inc. trademarks, which consist of the name “COSTAMARE” and the Costamare logo in connection, among others, with the operation of our containership and dry bulk vessel businesses. We will pay no additional consideration for this license and right. Costamare Shipping retains the right to use the trademarks in its own business or to maintain existing, or grant new, licenses or rights permitting any other person to use the trademarks; provided that in all such cases the use, maintenance or grant must be consistent with the license and right granted to us under the licensing agreement.
Grant of Rights and Issuance of Common Stock
On July 14, 2010, the Company offered all stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 14, 2010 (the “Record Date”), the right (collectively, the “Rights”) to subscribe for and purchase up to 32 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for each share held by such stockholder as of the Record Date. The subscription price for each share purchased pursuant to the exercise of Rights was $0.10 per share.
On March 27, 2012, the Company completed a follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 7,500,000 shares at a public offering price of $14.10 per share. The net proceeds of the follow-on offering were $100.6 million. Members of the Konstantakopoulos family purchased 750,000 shares in the offering.
On October 19, 2012, the Company completed a second follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 7,000,000 shares at a public offering price of $14.00 per share. The net proceeds of the follow-on offering were $93.5 million. Members of the Konstantakopoulos family purchased 700,000 shares in the offering.
On July 6, 2016, we implemented the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The Dividend Reinvestment Plan offers holders of our common stock the opportunity to purchase additional shares by having their cash dividends automatically reinvested in our common stock. For each of the quarters from the implementation of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan until August 6, 2024, members of the Konstantakopoulos family have reinvested in full or in part their cash dividends, receiving an aggregate of 21.3 million shares.
On December 5, 2016, the Company completed a follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $6.00 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $69.0 million. Members of the Konstantakopoulos family purchased 1,666,666 shares in the offering.
On May 31, 2017, the Company completed a follow-on public equity offering in which we issued 13,500,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $7.10 per share. The net proceeds of this offering were $91.68 million. Members of the Konstantakopoulos family purchased 1,408,451 shares in the offering.
Other Transactions
Our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, privately owns one containership (which is comparable to two of our vessels) and holds a passive interest in certain companies that own five containerships (which are comparable to 22 of our vessels). Mr. Konstantakopoulos also has a controlling interest in a company that owns one dry bulk vessel (which is comparable to six of our vessels) and holds a passive interest, together with members of his family, in a business involved in the ownership of one dry bulk vessel (which is comparable to 18 of our vessels). Mr. Konstantakopoulos may acquire additional vessels.
One of our non-independent board members holds a minority interest in a company that owns a containership comparable to four of our vessels and may acquire additional vessels.
Other than the containership and dry bulk vessel owned by Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, which have to give priority chartering to the Company’s vessels, these vessels may compete with the Company’s vessels for chartering opportunities. These investments were entered into in accordance with the terms of the restrictive covenant agreements referenced above following the review and approval of our Audit Committee and Board of Directors.
Under the Framework Deed entered into in May 2013, as amended and restated in May 2015 and as further amended in June 2018, we agreed with York to invest in newbuild and secondhand container vessels through jointly held companies, thereby increasing our ability to expand our operations while diversifying our risk. After acquiring a number of both newbuild and secondhand container vessels, the commitment period ended on May 15, 2020. The Framework Deed was terminated on December 31, 2024 upon the winding up of the last remaining Joint Venture entity.
Costamare Shipping had entered into separate management agreements with each Joint Venture entity pursuant to which Costamare Shipping provided technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering, accounting, sale and purchase, insurance and general and administrative services directly or together with V.Ships Greece directly or, upon being directed to do so, through V.Ships Shanghai. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, Costamare Shipping charged in aggregate to Joint Venture entities the amount of $2.0 million and nil, respectively, for services provided in accordance with the respective management agreements, including $0.5 million and nil, respectively, charged by third-party managers.
On January 1, 2018, Costamare Shipping entered into the Brokerage Agreement with Blue Net, as amended from time to time, which provides chartering brokerage services to our containerships and to the containerships acquired pursuant to the Framework Deed, as well as to other third-party containerships. Our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, controls 50% of Blue Net. Blue Net provided until August 2021 chartering brokerage services in exchange for a fee to the vessels belonging to a chartering pool which included one of our vessels. In addition, on March 31, 2020, Costamare Shipping agreed, on behalf of the owners of five vessels it manages, to pay Blue Net Asia, a company 50% owned by our chairman and chief executive officer, a commission of 1.25% of the gross daily hire earned from the charters arranged by Blue Net Asia for such five vessels. Blue Net does not provide its services to the five vessels for which charter brokerage services are being provided by Blue Net Asia.
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos owns 47.5% of the shares and voting rights of the International Institute of Maritime Education (“IIME”), which cooperates with the Business College of Athens, a private educational institution, for the provision of the certain on-line academic bachelor’s or master’s degrees in Maritime Business, Ship Management, Marine Engineering Management and Maritime Cyber Security. The Company agreed to offer grants of up to €2,000 per seafarer towards the fees for the aforementioned degrees or any individual course offered thereunder leading to a certificate or diploma from the Business College of Athens, up to €200,000 in total grants in each of 2023 and 2024 for enrollment up to October 2023 and October 2024, respectively. Additionally, IIME is providing a discount to our seafarers of up to 30% of the total fees per student, depending on the qualification sought.
Procedures for Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions
Related party transactions, which for purposes of review and approval, means transactions in which the Company or one of its subsidiaries is a participant and any of the Company’s directors, nominees for director, executive officers, employees, significant stockholders or members of their immediate families (other than immediate family members of employees who are not executive officers) have a direct or indirect interest, will be subject to review and approval or ratification by the board of directors and the audit committee, and will be evaluated pursuant to procedures established by the board of directors.
Where appropriate, such transactions will be subject to the approval of our independent directors, including appropriate matters arising under the Framework Agreement and Services Agreement, such as the amendment and restatement of such agreement, matters arising under the restrictive covenant agreements, such as waivers of the restrictions thereunder, and any other agreements with entities controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer.
C. | Interests of Experts and Counsel |
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
A. | Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information |
See “Item 18. Financial Statements” below.
Legal Proceedings
A subsidiary of the Company and Costamare Shipping were defendants and third-party defendants to lawsuits pending in the United States Court for the Central District of California relating to liabilities associated with damage to a pipeline and an oil spill that occurred in October 2021 off the coast of Long Beach, California. The oil spill was caused by the rupture of a pipeline owned by Amplify Energy Corp. and certain affiliates (“Amplify”). The claimants in the lawsuit alleged that a vessel owned by one of the Company’s subsidiaries, the containership Beijing, dragged its anchor across the pipeline many months prior to the rupture, during a severe heavy wind event when numerous other vessels were unable to hold their ground and dragged their anchors, and contributed to the spill. The complaint alleged that a vessel owned by another containership company also dragged its anchor across the pipeline on the same day. On December 22, 2023, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Office of Spill Prevention and Response issued a notice of violation to the Company’s subsidiary and Costamare Shipping alleging that they violated California Government Code sections 8670.20 and 8670.25.5(a)(1), which relate to notification of vessel disability or reporting of discharge or threatened discharge of oil and seeking civil administrative penalties. The Company’s subsidiary and Costamare Shipping have now settled all pending claims relating to the October 2021 oil spill. In connection with these settlements, neither the Company’s subsidiary nor Costamare Shipping have admitted liability. The payments that were required under these settlement agreements will be fully covered by insurance.
In 2022, eight subsidiaries of the Company served notices of termination for a total of eight newbuild vessels on order at a Chinese shipyard due to default by the shipyard, and they are currently in arbitration with the shipyard in connection with the terminations.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally property damage and personal injury claims. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary deductibles, although there can be no assurance our insurers would agree in any particular case. Furthermore, those claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
Dividends on Preferred Stock are payable quarterly on each of January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15, as and if declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds for such purpose. The dividend rate for the Series B Preferred Stock is 7.625% per annum per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share (equal to $1.90625 per annum per share). The dividend rate for the Series C Preferred Stock is 8.50% per annum per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share (equal to $2.125 per annum per share). The dividend rate for the Series D Preferred Stock is 8.75% per annum per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share (equal to $2.1875 per annum per share). The dividend rate for the Series E Preferred Stock was 8.75% per annum per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share (equal to $2.21875 per annum per share). The Company completed the full redemption of all of its 4,574,100 outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock on July 15, 2024. The dividend rates are not subject to adjustment.
We paid dividends to holders of our Preferred Stock as per the table below:
| | Preferred Series B amount paid per share | | | Preferred Series C amount paid per share | | | Preferred Series D amount paid per share | | | Preferred Series E amount paid per share | |
October 15, 2013 | | $ | 0.365400 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
January 15, 2014 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
April 15, 2014 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.495833 | | | | — | | | | — | |
July 15, 2014 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | | — | | | | — | |
October 15, 2014 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | | — | | | | — | |
January 15, 2015 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | | — | | | | — | |
April 15, 2015 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | | — | | | | — | |
July 15, 2015 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.376736 | | | | — | |
October 15, 2015 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
January 15, 2016 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
April 15, 2016 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
July 15, 2016 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
October 17, 2016 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
January 17, 2017 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
April 17, 2017 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
July 17, 2017 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
October 16, 2017 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
January 16, 2018 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
April 16, 2018 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.462240 | |
July 16, 2018 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
October 15, 2018 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
January 15, 2019 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
April 15, 2019 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
July 15, 2019 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
October 15, 2019 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
January 15, 2020 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
April 15, 2020 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
July 15, 2020 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
October 15, 2020 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
January 15, 2021 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
April 15, 2021 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
July 15, 2021 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
October 15, 2021 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
January 18, 2022 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
April 18, 2022 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
July 15, 2022 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
October 17, 2022 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
January 17, 2023 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
April 17, 2023 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
July 17, 2023 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
October 16, 2023 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
January 16, 2024 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
April 15, 2024 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
July 15, 2024 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | $ | 0.554688 | |
October 15, 2024 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
January 15, 2025 | | $ | 0.476563 | | | $ | 0.531250 | | | $ | 0.546875 | | | | — | |
Our Preferred Stock dividend payment obligations impact our future liquidity needs.
Common Stock Dividend Policy
We paid our first cash dividend since becoming a public company in November 2010 on February 4, 2011 in an amount of $0.25 per share of common stock. We have subsequently paid dividends to holders of our common stock of $0.25 per share on May 12, 2011 and August 9, 2011, $0.27 per share on November 7, 2011, February 8, 2012, May 9, 2012, August 7, 2012, November 6, 2012, February 13, 2013, May 8, 2013, August 7, 2013, November 6, 2013 and February 4, 2014, $0.28 per share on May 13, 2014, August 6, 2014, November 5, 2014 and February 4, 2015, $0.29 per share on May 6, 2015, August 5, 2015, November 4, 2015, February 4, 2016, May 4, 2016 and August 17, 2016 and $0.10 per share on November 4, 2016, February 6, 2017, May 8, 2017, August 7, 2017, November 6, 2017, February 6, 2018, May 8, 2018, August 8, 2018, November 8, 2018, February 7, 2019, May 8, 2019, August 7, 2019, November 7, 2019, February 5, 2020, May 7, 2020, August 7, 2020, November 5, 2020, February 5, 2021 and May 6, 2021, and $0.115 per share on August 5, 2021, November 5, 2021, February 7, 2022, May 5, 2022, August 8, 2022, November 7, 2022, February 7, 2023, May 5, 2023, August 7, 2023, November 6, 2023, February 7, 2024, May 6, 2024, August, 6, 2024, November 6, 2024 and February 6, 2025. On May 5, 2022, we also paid a special dividend of $0.50 per share.
On July 6, 2016, we implemented the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The Dividend Reinvestment Plan offers holders of our common stock the opportunity to purchase additional shares by having their cash dividends automatically reinvested in our common stock. Participation in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan is optional, and shareholders who decide not to participate in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan will continue to receive cash dividends, as declared and paid in the usual manner. On February 7, 2024, May 6, 2024, August 6, 2024, November 6, 2024 and February 6, 2025, we issued 420,178 shares, 369,233 shares, 185,758 shares, 6,251 shares and 7,056 shares, respectively, pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Our Chairman and CEO, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, reinvested all his cash dividends on the aforementioned dates until August 6, 2024, after which Mr. Konstantakopoulos terminated his participation in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
We currently intend to pay dividends in amounts that will allow us to retain a portion of our cash flows to fund vessel, fleet or company acquisitions that we expect to be accretive to earnings, and cash flows and for debt repayment and dry-docking costs, as determined by management and our board of directors. Declaration and payment of any dividend is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and the requirements of Marshall Islands law. The timing and amount of dividend payments will be dependent upon our earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, fleet renewal and expansion, restrictions in our credit facilities, the provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of distributions to stockholders and other factors. We cannot assure you that we will pay regular quarterly dividends in the amounts stated above or elsewhere in this annual report, and dividends may be reduced or discontinued at any time at the discretion of our board of directors. Our ability to pay dividends may be limited by the amount of cash we can generate from operations following the payment of fees and expenses and the establishment of any reserves, as well as additional factors unrelated to our profitability. We are a holding company, and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments.
Set out below is a table showing the dividends paid in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024.
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | |
Common Stock dividends paid | | $ | 34.3 | | | $ | 40.2 | | | $ | 88.4 | | | $ | 39.1 | | | $ | 43.5 | | | $ | 245.5 | |
Common Stock dividends paid in shares under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan | | | 13.8 | | | | 12.6 | | | | 30.3 | | | | 16.3 | | | | 11.3 | | | | 84.3 | |
Preferred Stock dividends paid | | | 31.2 | | | | 31.1 | | | | 31.1 | | | | 31.1 | | | | 28.5 | | | | 153.0 | |
Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
B. Significant Changes
See “Item 18. Financial Statements—Note 25. Subsequent Events” below.
ITEM 9. | THE OFFER AND LISTING |
Our common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CMRE”.
ITEM 10. | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
Under our articles of incorporation, our authorized capital stock consists of (i) 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which, as of December 31, 2024, 130,958,943 shares were issued, of which 11,004,510 were treasury shares and (ii) 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, issuable in series of which, as of December 31, 2024: no shares of Series A Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding, although 10,000,000 shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock in connection with our adoption of a stockholder rights plan as described below under “—Stockholder Rights Plan”; 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued and 1,970,649 are outstanding; 4,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock were issued and 3,973,135 are outstanding; and 4,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and 3,986,542 are outstanding. The Company completed the full redemption of all of its 4,574,100 outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock on July 15, 2024. The Company funded the redemption with cash on hand. All of our shares of stock are in registered form.
Please see Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for a discussion of the recent history of our share capital.
B. | Memorandum and Articles of Association |
Our purpose, as stated in our articles of incorporation, is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be organized under the BCA. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not impose any limitations on the ownership rights of our stockholders.
Under our bylaws, annual stockholder meetings will be held at a time and place selected by our board of directors. The meetings may be held inside or outside of the Marshall Islands. Special meetings may be called by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer or a majority of the board of directors. Our board of directors may set a record date between 15 and 60 days before the date of any meeting to determine the stockholders that will be eligible to receive notice and vote at the meeting. Our bylaws permit stockholder action by unanimous written consent.
We are registered in the Republic of the Marshall Islands at The Trust Company of the Marshall Islands, Inc., Registrar of Corporation for non-resident corporations, under registration number 29593.
Directors
Under our bylaws, our directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at each annual meeting of the stockholders by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election. There is no provision for cumulative voting.
Pursuant to the provisions of our bylaws, the board of directors may change the number of directors to not less than three, nor more than 15, by a vote of a majority of the entire board. Each director shall be elected to serve until the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, except in the event of death, resignation or removal. A vacancy on the board created by death, resignation, removal (which may only be for cause), or failure of the stockholders to elect the entire class of directors to be elected at any election of directors or for any other reason may be filled only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, at any special meeting called for that purpose or at any regular meeting of the board of directors. The board of directors has the authority to fix the amounts which shall be payable to the non-employee members of our board of directors for attendance at any meeting or for services rendered to us.
Common Stock
Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares of preferred stock, holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive ratably all dividends, if any, declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for dividends. Upon our dissolution or liquidation or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to the holders of preferred stock having liquidation preferences, if any, the holders of our common stock will be entitled to receive pro rata our remaining assets available for distribution. Holders of common stock do not have conversion, redemption or preemptive rights to subscribe to any of our securities. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to the rights of the holders of any shares of preferred stock which we may issue in the future. Our common stock is not subject to any sinking fund provisions and no holder of any shares will be required to make additional contributions of capital with respect to our shares in the future. There are no provisions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws discriminating against a stockholder because of his or her ownership of a particular number of shares.
We are not aware of any limitations on the rights to own our common stock, including rights of non-resident or foreign stockholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our common stock, imposed by foreign law or by our articles of incorporation or bylaws.
Preferred Stock
Our articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors, without any further vote or action by our stockholders, to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock, of which 10,000,000 shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock in connection with our adoption of a stockholder rights plan as described below under “— Stockholder Rights Plan”, 2,000,000 shares have been designated (currently 1,970,649 shares remain outstanding) Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, 4,000,000 shares have been designated (currently 3,973,135 shares remain outstanding) Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, 4,000,000 shares have been designated (currently 3,986,542 shares remain outstanding) Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock and 686,000 shares have been designated as Series E Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (currently no shares remain outstanding), and to determine, with respect to any series of preferred stock established by our board of directors, the terms and rights of that series, including:
| • | the designation of the series; |
| • | the number of shares of the series; |
| • | the preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such series; and |
| • | the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series. |
Stockholder Rights Plan
Each share of our common stock includes a right that entitles the holder to purchase from us a unit consisting of one-thousandth of a share of our Series A participating preferred stock at a purchase price of $25.00 per unit, subject to specified adjustments. The rights are issued pursuant to a stockholder rights agreement between us and Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, as rights agent. Until a right is exercised, the holder of a right will have no rights to vote or receive dividends or any other stockholder rights.
The rights may have anti-takeover effects. The rights will cause substantial dilution to any person or group that attempts to acquire us without the approval of our board of directors. As a result, the overall effect of the rights may be to render more difficult or discourage any attempt to acquire us. Because our board of directors can approve a redemption of the rights for a permitted offer, the rights should not interfere with a merger or other business combination approved by our board of directors. The adoption of the rights agreement was approved by our existing stockholders prior to our initial public offering in November 2010.
We have summarized the material terms and conditions of the rights agreement and the rights below. For a complete description of the rights, we encourage you to read the stockholder rights agreement, which we have filed as an exhibit to this annual report.
Detachment of rights
The rights are attached to all certificates representing our outstanding common stock and will attach to all common stock certificates we issue prior to the rights distribution date that we describe below. The rights are not exercisable until after the rights distribution date and will expire at the close of business on the tenth anniversary date of the adoption of the rights plan, unless we redeem or exchange them earlier as described below. The rights will separate from the common stock and a rights distribution date will occur, subject to specified exceptions, on the earlier of the following two dates:
| • | 10 days following the first public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons or an “acquiring person” has acquired or obtained the right to acquire beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock; or |
| • | 10 business days following the start of a tender or exchange offer that would result, if closed, in a person becoming an “acquiring person”. |
Our controlling stockholders are excluded from the definition of “acquiring person” for purposes of the rights, and therefore their ownership or future share acquisitions cannot trigger the rights. Specified “inadvertent” owners that would otherwise become an acquiring person, including those who would have this designation as a result of repurchases of common stock by us, will not become acquiring persons as a result of those transactions.
Our board of directors may defer the rights distribution date in some circumstances, and some inadvertent acquisitions will not result in a person becoming an acquiring person if the person promptly divests itself of a sufficient number of shares of common stock.
Until the rights distribution date:
| • | our common stock certificates will evidence the rights, and the rights will be transferable only with those certificates; and |
| • | any new shares of common stock will be issued with rights, and new certificates will contain a notation incorporating the rights agreement by reference. |
As soon as practicable after the rights distribution date, the rights agent will mail certificates representing the rights to holders of record of common stock at the close of business on that date. As of the rights distribution date, only separate rights certificates will represent the rights.
We will not issue rights with any shares of common stock we issue after the rights distribution date, except as our board of directors may otherwise determine.
Flip-in event
A “flip-in event” will occur under the rights agreement when a person becomes an acquiring person. If a flip-in event occurs and we do not redeem the rights as described under the heading “—Redemption of rights” below, each right, other than any right that has become void, as described below, will become exercisable at the time it is no longer redeemable for the number of shares of common stock, or, in some cases, cash, property or other of our securities, having a current market price equal to two times the exercise price of such right.
If a flip-in event occurs, all rights that then are, or in some circumstances that were, beneficially owned by or transferred to an acquiring person or specified related parties will become void in the circumstances which the rights agreement specifies.
Flip-over event
A “flip-over event” will occur under the rights agreement when, at any time after a person has become an acquiring person:
| • | we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction; or |
| • | 50% or more of our assets, cash flows or earning power is sold or transferred. |
If a flip-over event occurs, each holder of a right, other than any right that has become void as we describe under the heading “—Flip-in event” above, will have the right to receive the number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company having a current market price equal to two times the exercise price of such right.
Antidilution
The number of outstanding rights associated with our common stock is subject to adjustment for any stock split, stock dividend or subdivision, combination or reclassification of our common stock occurring prior to the rights distribution date. With some exceptions, the rights agreement does not require us to adjust the exercise price of the rights until cumulative adjustments amount to at least 1% of the exercise price. It also does not require us to issue fractional shares of our preferred stock that are not integral multiples of one one-hundredth of a share, and, instead, we may make a cash adjustment based on the market price of the common stock on the last trading date prior to the date of exercise. The rights agreement reserves us the right to require, prior to the occurrence of any flip-in event or flip-over event that, on any exercise of rights, a number of rights must be exercised so that we will issue only whole shares of stock.
Redemption of rights
At any time until 10 days after the date on which the occurrence of a flip-in event is first publicly announced, we may redeem the rights in whole, but not in part, at a redemption price of $0.01 per right. The redemption price is subject to adjustment for any stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction occurring before the date of redemption. At our option, we may pay that redemption price in cash, shares of common stock or any other consideration our board of directors may select. The rights are not exercisable after a flip-in event until they are no longer redeemable. If our board of directors timely orders the redemption of the rights, the rights will terminate on the effectiveness of that action.
Exchange of rights
We may, at our option, exchange the rights (other than rights owned by an acquiring person or an affiliate or an associate of an acquiring person, which have become void), in whole or in part. The exchange must be at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock per right, subject to specified adjustments at any time after the occurrence of a flip-in event and prior to:
| • | any person other than our existing stockholder becoming the beneficial owner of common stock with voting power equal to 50% or more of the total voting power of all shares of common stock entitled to vote in the election of directors; or |
| • | the occurrence of a flip-over event. |
Amendment of terms of rights
While the rights are outstanding, we may amend the provisions of the rights agreement only as follows:
| • | to cure any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency; |
| • | to make changes that do not adversely affect the interests of holders of rights, excluding the interests of any acquiring person; or |
| • | to shorten or lengthen any time period under the rights agreement, except that we cannot change the time period when rights may be redeemed or lengthen any time period, unless such lengthening protects, enhances or clarifies the benefits of holders of rights other than an acquiring person. |
At any time when no rights are outstanding, we may amend any of the provisions of the rights agreement, other than decreasing the redemption price.
Dissenters’ Rights of Appraisal and Payment
Under the BCA, our stockholders have the right to dissent from various corporate actions, including any merger or sale of all, or substantially all, of our assets not made in the usual course of our business, and receive payment of the fair value of their shares. In the event of any amendment of our articles of incorporation, a stockholder also has the right to dissent and receive payment for his or her shares if the amendment alters certain rights in respect of those shares. The dissenting stockholder must follow the procedures set forth in the BCA to receive payment. In the event that we and any dissenting stockholder fail to agree on a price for the shares, the BCA procedures involve, among other things, the institution of proceedings in the high court of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or in any appropriate court in any jurisdiction in which our shares are primarily traded on a local or national securities exchange. The value of the shares of the dissenting stockholder is fixed by the court after reference, if the court so elects, to the recommendations of a court-appointed appraiser.
Stockholders’ Derivative Actions
Under the BCA, any of our stockholders may bring an action in our name to procure a judgment in our favor, also known as a derivative action; provided that the stockholder bringing the action is a holder of common stock both at the time the derivative action is commenced and at the time of the transaction to which the action relates. A complaint shall set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure the initiation of such action by the Board of Directors or the reasons for not making such effort.
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
The BCA authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors and officers to corporations and their stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of directors’ fiduciary duties. Our articles of incorporation include a provision that eliminates the personal liability of directors for monetary damages for actions taken as a director to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Our bylaws provide that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by law. We are also expressly authorized to advance certain expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements and court costs) to our directors and officers and carry directors’ and officers’ insurance providing indemnification for our directors, officers and certain employees for some liabilities. We believe that these indemnification provisions and insurance are useful to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. In addition, stockholders’ investments may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.
Anti-Takeover Effect of Certain Provisions of Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
Several provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, which are summarized in the following paragraphs, may have anti-takeover effects. These provisions are intended to avoid costly takeover battles, lessen our vulnerability to a hostile change of control and enhance the ability of our board of directors to maximize stockholder value in connection with any unsolicited offer to acquire us. However, these anti-takeover provisions could also delay, defer or prevent (a) the merger or acquisition of our company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise that a stockholder might consider in its best interest, including attempts that may result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by the stockholders, and (b) the removal of incumbent officers and directors.
Blank check preferred stock
Under the terms of our articles of incorporation, our board of directors has authority, without any further vote or action by our stockholders, to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock, of which 10,000,000 shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock, in connection with our adoption of a stockholder rights plan as described above under “—Stockholder Rights Plan”, 2,000,000 shares have been designated Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, 4,000,000 shares have been designated Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, 4,000,000 shares have been designated Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock and 686,000 shares have been designated as Series E Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock. Our board of directors may issue shares of preferred stock on terms calculated to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or the removal of our management.
Classified board of directors
Our articles of incorporation provide for a board of directors serving staggered, three-year terms. Approximately one-third of our board of directors will be elected each year. This classified board provision could discourage a third party from making a tender offer for our shares or attempting to obtain control of our company. It could also delay stockholders who do not agree with the policies of the board of directors from removing a majority of the board of directors for two years.
Election and removal of directors
Our articles of incorporation prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors. Our bylaws require parties other than the board of directors to give advance written notice of nominations for the election of directors. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws also provide that our directors may be removed only for cause. These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent the removal of incumbent officers and directors.
Holders of the Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights except (1) in respect of amendments to the Articles of Incorporation which would adversely alter the preferences, powers or rights of the Preferred Stock or (2) in the event that the Company proposes to issue any parity stock if the cumulative dividends payable on outstanding Preferred Stock are in arrears or any senior stock. However, if and whenever dividends payable on the Preferred Stock are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, holders of Preferred Stock (for this purpose the Series B, Series C and Series D Preferred Stock will vote together as a single class with all other classes or series of parity stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will be entitled to elect one additional director to serve on our board of directors, and the size of our board of directors will be increased as needed to accommodate such change (unless the size of our board of directors already has been increased by reason of the election of a director by holders of parity stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and with which the Preferred Stock voted as a class for the election of such director). The right of such holders of Preferred Stock to elect a member of our board of directors will continue until such time as all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Preferred Stock have been paid in full.
Calling of special meeting of stockholders
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may only be called by our chairman of the board of directors, chief executive officer or by either, at the request of a majority of our board of directors.
Advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director nominations
Our bylaws provide that stockholders seeking to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders must provide timely notice of their proposal in writing to the corporate secretary.
Generally, to be timely, a stockholder’s notice must be received at our offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the previous year’s annual meeting. Our bylaws also specify requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder’s notice. These provisions may impede stockholders’ ability to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders or to make nominations for directors at an annual meeting of stockholders.
The following is a summary of each material contract outside the ordinary course of business to which we are a party. Such summaries are not intended to be complete and reference is made to the contracts themselves, which are exhibits to this annual report.
| (a) | Restrictive Covenant Agreement dated November 3, 2010, as amended and restated on July 1, 2021 between Costamare Inc. and Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Restrictive Covenant Agreements”. |
| (b) | Stockholder Rights Agreement dated October 19, 2010, between Costamare Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent. For a description of the Stockholder Rights Agreement, please see “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Stockholder Rights Plan”. |
| (c) | Trademark License Agreement dated November 3, 2010 as amended and restated on March 14, 2022, between Costamare Inc. and Costamare Shipping Company S.A., please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Trademark License Agreement”. |
| (d) | Restrictive Covenant Agreement dated July 24, 2012, between Costamare Inc. and Konstantinos Zacharatos, please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Restrictive Covenant Agreements”. |
| (e) | Framework Deed dated May 15, 2013, as amended and restated on May 18, 2015, between Sparrow Holdings, L.P., York Capital Management Global Advisors LLC, Costamare Inc. and Costamare Ventures Inc., please see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet—Framework Deed”. |
| (f) | Services Agreement dated November 2, 2015, as amended and restated on June 28, 2021 and as further amended on December 12, 2024, by and between the subsidiaries of Costamare Inc. set out in Schedule A thereto and Costamare Shipping Services Ltd., please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreement”. |
| (g) | Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 27, 2015, between Costamare Inc. and the Stockholders named therein, please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement”. |
| (h) | Framework Agreement dated November 2, 2015, as amended and restated on January 17, 2020, on June 28, 2021 and as further amended on December 12, 2024, by and between Costamare Inc. and Costamare Shipping Company S.A., please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreement”. |
| (i) | Amended and Restated Subscription and Shareholders’ Agreement Relating to Neptune Maritime Leasing Limited dated March 14, 2023, by and among Snow White Investments Limited, International Maritime Holdings A.G., Codrus Capital A.G., Stephen Asplin, Konstantinos Karamanis, Costamare Maritime Finance Limited and Neptune Maritime Leasing Limited, please see “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company”. |
D. Exchange Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders
Under Marshall Islands law, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our common stock.
MARSHALL ISLANDS COMPANY CONSIDERATIONS
Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. For example, the BCA allows the adoption of various anti-takeover measures such as shareholder “rights” plans. While the BCA also provides that it is to be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, Marshall Islands’ court cases interpreting the BCA. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as United States courts and you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction that has developed a substantial body of case law. The following table provides a comparison between the statutory provisions of the BCA and the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to shareholders’ rights.
Marshall Islands | | Delaware |
| | |
Shareholder Meetings | | |
| | |
Held at a time and place as designated in the bylaws. | | May be held at such time or place as designated in the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws, or if not so designated, as determined by the Board of Directors. |
| | |
May be held in or outside of the Marshall Islands. | | May be held in or outside of Delaware. |
| | |
Whenever shareholders are required to take action at a meeting, written notice shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting, and unless it is the annual meeting, indicates that it is being issued by or at the direction of the person calling the meeting, and if such meeting is a special meeting such notice shall also state the purpose for which it is being called. | | Whenever shareholders are required to take any action at a meeting, a written notice of the meeting shall be given which shall state the place, if any, date and hour of the meeting, and the means of remote communication, if any. |
| | |
A copy of the notice of any meeting shall be given personally, sent by mail or by electronic transmission not less than 15 nor more than 60 days before the date of the meeting. | | Written notice shall be given not less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the meeting. |
| | |
Shareholder’s Voting Rights | | |
| | |
Any action required to be taken by a meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting if consent is in writing, sets forth the action so taken and is signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote or if the articles of incorporation so provide, by holders of outstanding shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. | | With limited exceptions, shareholders may act by written consent to elect directors. |
Any person authorized to vote may authorize another person to act for him or her by proxy. | | Any person authorized to vote may authorize another person or persons to act for him or her by proxy. |
| | |
Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or bylaws, a majority of shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum. In no event shall a quorum consist of fewer than one-third of the shares entitled to vote at a meeting. | | For stock corporations, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws may specify the number to constitute a quorum, but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than one third of shares entitled to vote at a meeting. In the absence of such specifications, a majority of shares entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum. |
| | |
When a quorum is once present to organize a meeting, it is not broken by the subsequent withdrawal of any shareholders. | | When a quorum is once present to organize a meeting, it is not broken by the subsequent withdrawal of any shareholders. |
| | |
The articles of incorporation may provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors. | | The certificate of incorporation may provide for cumulative voting. |
| | |
Any two or more domestic corporations may merge into a single corporation if approved by the board and if authorized by the vote of the majority of holders of outstanding shares entitled to vote at a shareholder meeting. | | Any two or more corporations existing under the laws of the state may merge into a single corporation pursuant to a board resolution and upon the majority vote by shareholders of each constituent corporation at an annual or special meeting. |
| | |
Any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of a corporation, if not made in the corporation’s usual or regular course of business, once approved by the board, shall be authorized by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the shares of those entitled to vote at a shareholder meeting. | | Every corporation may at any meeting of the board sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of its property and assets as its board deems expedient and for the best interests of the corporation when so authorized by a resolution adopted by the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of a corporation entitled to vote. |
| | |
Any domestic corporation owning at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of another domestic corporation may merge such other corporation into itself without the authorization of the shareholders of any corporation. | | Any corporation owning at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of another corporation may merge the other corporation into itself and assume all of its obligations without the vote or consent of shareholders; however, in case the parent corporation is not the surviving corporation, the proposed merger shall be approved by a majority of the outstanding stock of the parent corporation entitled to vote at a duly called shareholder meeting. |
| | |
Any mortgage, pledge of or creation of a security interest in all or any part of the corporate property may be authorized without the vote or consent of the shareholders, unless otherwise provided for in the articles of incorporation. | | Any mortgage or pledge of a corporation’s property and assets may be authorized without the vote or consent of shareholders, except to the extent that the certificate of incorporation otherwise provides. |
| | |
Directors | | |
| | |
The board of directors must consist of at least one member. | | The board of directors must consist of at least one member. |
Number of members can be changed by an amendment to the bylaws, by the shareholders, or by action of the board pursuant to the bylaws. | | Number of board members shall be fixed by the bylaws, unless the certificate of incorporation fixes the number of directors, in which case a change in the number shall be made only by amendment of the certificate of incorporation. |
| | |
If the board of directors is authorized to change the number of directors, it can only do so by a majority of the entire board and so long as no decrease in the number shall shorten the term of any incumbent director. | | |
| | |
Removal: | | Removal: |
| | |
• Any or all of the directors may be removed for cause by vote of the shareholders. | | • Any or all of the directors may be removed, with or without cause, by the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote unless the certificate of incorporation otherwise provides. |
| | |
• If the articles of incorporation or the bylaws so provide, any or all of the directors may be removed without cause by vote of the shareholders | | • In the case of a classified board, shareholders may effect removal of any or all directors only for cause. |
| | |
Dissenter’s Rights of Appraisal | | |
| | |
With limited exceptions, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a corporation in a merger or consolidation. | | With limited exceptions, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a corporation in a merger or consolidation. |
| | |
A holder of any adversely affected shares who does not vote on, or consent in writing to, an amendment to the articles of incorporation has the right to dissent and to receive payment for such shares if the amendment | | The certificate of incorporation may provide that appraisal rights are available for shares as a result of an amendment to the certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets. |
| | |
• alters or abolishes any preferential right of any outstanding shares having preference;
• creates, alters, or abolishes any provision or right in respect to the redemption of any outstanding shares;
• alters or abolishes any preemptive right of such holder to acquire shares or other securities; or
• excludes or limits the right of such holder to vote on any matter, except as such right may be limited by the voting rights given to new shares then being authorized of any existing or new class. | | |
Shareholder’s Derivative Actions | | |
| | |
An action may be brought in the right of a corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, by a holder of shares or of voting trust certificates or of a beneficial interest in such shares or certificates. It shall be made to appear that the plaintiff is such a holder at the time of bringing the action and that he was such a holder at the time of the transaction of which he complains, or that his shares or his interest therein devolved upon him by operation of law. | | In any derivative suit instituted by a shareholder of a corporation, it shall be averred in the complaint that the plaintiff was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of the transaction of which he complains or that such shareholder’s stock thereafter devolved upon such shareholder by operation of law. |
| | |
Complaint shall set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure the initiation of such action by the board of directors or the reasons for not making such effort.
Such action shall not be discontinued, compromised or settled, without the approval of the High Court of the Marshall Islands
Reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, may be awarded if the action is successful
Corporation may require a plaintiff bringing a derivative suit to give security for reasonable expenses if the plaintiff owns less than 5% of any class of stock and the shares have a value of less than $50,000. | | |
Marshall Islands Tax Considerations
We are a non-resident domestic Marshall Islands corporation. Because we do not, and we do not expect that we will, conduct business or operations in the Marshall Islands, under current Marshall Islands law we are not subject to tax on income or capital gains and our stockholders (so long as they are not citizens or residents of the Marshall Islands) will not be subject to Marshall Islands taxation or withholding on dividends and other distributions (including upon a return of capital) we make to our stockholders. In addition, so long as our stockholders are not citizens or residents of the Marshall Islands, our stockholders will not be subject to Marshall Islands stamp, capital gains or other taxes on the purchase, holding or disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock, and our stockholders will not be required by the Republic of the Marshall Islands to file a tax return relating to our common stock or Preferred Stock.
Each stockholder is urged to consult their tax counselor or other advisor with regard to the legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent jurisdictions, including the Marshall Islands, of their investment in us. Further, it is the responsibility of each stockholder to file all state, local and non-U.S., as well as U.S. Federal tax returns that may be required of them.
Liberian Tax Considerations
The Republic of Liberia enacted a new income tax act effective as of January 1, 2001 (the “New Act”). In contrast to the income tax law previously in effect since 1977, the New Act does not distinguish between the taxation of “non-resident” Liberian corporations, such as our Liberian subsidiaries, which conduct no business in Liberia and were wholly exempt from taxation under the prior law, and “resident” Liberian corporations, which conduct business in Liberia and are (and were under the prior law) subject to taxation.
The New Act was amended by the Consolidated Tax Amendments Act of 2011, which was published and became effective on November 1, 2011 (the “Amended Act”). The Amended Act specifically exempts from taxation non-resident Liberian corporations such as our Liberian subsidiaries that engage in international shipping (and are not engaged in shipping exclusively within Liberia) and that do not engage in other business or activities in Liberia other than those specifically enumerated in the Amended Act. In addition, the Amended Act made such exemption from taxation retroactive to the effective date of the New Act.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion of U.S. Federal income tax matters is based on the Code, judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion does not address any U.S. state or local tax matters. This discussion does not address the tax treatment of U.S. holders (as defined below) which own directly, indirectly or constructively 10% or more of our shares (as measured by vote or value). You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the particular United States Federal, state and local and foreign income and other tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our common stock or Preferred Stock that may be applicable to you.
Taxation of Our Shipping Income
Subject to the discussion of “effectively connected” income below, unless exempt from U.S. Federal income tax under the rules contained in Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, a non-U.S. corporation is, under the rules of Section 887 of the Code, subject to a 4% U.S. Federal income tax in respect of its U.S. source gross transportation income (without the allowance for deductions).
For this purpose, U.S. source gross transportation income includes 50% of the shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends (but that does not both begin and end) in the United States. Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports is generally not subject to any U.S. Federal income tax.
“Shipping income” means income that is derived from:
| (b) | the hiring or leasing of vessels for use on a time, operating or bareboat charter basis; |
| (c) | the participation in a pool, partnership, strategic alliance, joint operating agreement or other joint venture it directly or indirectly owns or participates in that generates such income; or |
| (d) | the performance of services directly related to those uses. |
Under Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, a non-U.S. corporation will be exempt from U.S. Federal income tax on its U.S. source gross transportation income if:
| (a) | it is organized in a foreign country (or the “country of organization”) that grants an “equivalent exemption” to U.S. corporations; and |
| (i) | more than 50% of the value of its stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by individuals who are “residents” of our country of organization or of another foreign country that grants an “equivalent exemption” to U.S. corporations; or |
| (ii) | its stock is “primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market” in its country of organization, in another country that grants an “equivalent exemption” to U.S. corporations, or in the United States. |
We believe that we have qualified and currently intend to continue to qualify for this statutory tax exemption for the foreseeable future. However, no assurance can be given that this will be the case in the future. If we or our subsidiaries are not entitled to this exemption under Section 883 for any taxable year, we or our subsidiaries would be subject for those years to a 4% U.S. Federal income tax on our U.S. source gross transportation income, subject to the discussion of “effectively connected” income below. Since we expect that no more than 50% of our gross shipping income would be treated as U.S. source gross transportation income, we expect that the effective rate of U.S. Federal income tax on our gross transportation income would not exceed 2%. Many of our time charters contain provisions pursuant to which charterers undertake to reimburse us for the 4% gross basis tax on our U.S. source gross transportation income.
To the extent exemption under Section 883 is unavailable, our U.S. source gross transportation income that is considered to be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business would be subject to the U.S. corporate income tax currently imposed at a rate of 21% (net of applicable deductions). In addition, we may be subject to the 30% U.S. “branch profits” tax on earnings effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, and on certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the conduct of our U.S. trade or business.
Our U.S. source gross transportation income would be considered “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business only if:
| (a) | we had, or were considered to have, a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of U.S. source gross transportation income; and |
| (b) | substantially all of our U.S. source gross transportation income was attributable to regularly scheduled transportation, such as the operation of a vessel that followed a published schedule with repeated sailings at regular intervals between the same points for voyages that begin or end in the United States. |
We believe that we will not meet these conditions because we will not have, or permit circumstances that would result in us having, such a fixed place of business in the United States.
In addition, income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States is not subject to the tax rules described above. Such income is subject to either a 30% gross-basis tax or to U.S. Federal corporate income tax on net income currently imposed at a rate of 21% (and the branch profits tax discussed above). Although there can be no assurance, we do not expect to engage in transportation that produces shipping income of this type.
Taxation of Gain on Sale of Assets
Regardless of whether we qualify for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code, we will not be subject to U.S. Federal income taxation with respect to gain realized on a sale of a vessel, provided the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States (as determined under U.S. tax principles). In general, a sale of a vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if title to the vessel (and risk of loss with respect to the vessel) passes to the buyer outside of the United States. We expect that any sale of a vessel will be so structured that it will be considered to occur outside of the United States.
Taxation of United States Holders
You are a “U.S. holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common stock or our Preferred Stock and you are (i) a U.S. citizen or resident, (ii) a U.S. corporation (or other U.S. entity taxable as a corporation), (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. Federal income taxation regardless of its source or (iv) a trust if (x) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of that trust or (y) the trust has a valid election in effect to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.
If a partnership holds our common stock or Preferred Stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding our common stock or Preferred Stock, you should consult your tax advisor.
Distributions on Our Common Stock and Preferred Stock
Subject to the discussion of PFICs below, any distributions with respect to our common stock or Preferred Stock that you receive from us will generally constitute dividends, which may be taxable as ordinary income or “qualified dividend income” as described below, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. Federal tax principles). Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated first as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in our common stock or Preferred Stock (on a dollar-for-dollar basis) and thereafter as capital gain.
If you are a U.S. corporation (or a U.S. entity taxable as a corporation), you will generally not be entitled to claim a dividends-received deduction with respect to any distributions you receive from us.
Dividends paid with respect to our common stock or Preferred Stock will generally be treated as “passive category income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
If you are an individual, trust or estate, dividends you receive from us should be treated as “qualified dividend income”; provided that:
| (a) | the common stock or Preferred Stock, as the case may be, is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (such as the NYSE); |
| (b) | we are not a PFIC for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year (see the discussion below under “PFIC Status”); |
| (c) | you own our common stock or our Preferred Stock for more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the date on which the common stock or Preferred Stock becomes ex-dividend; |
| (d) | you are not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property; and |
| (e) | certain other conditions are met. |
Qualified dividend income is currently taxed at a preferential maximum rate of 15% or 20%, depending on the income level of the taxpayer.
Special rules may apply to any “extraordinary dividend”. Generally, an extraordinary dividend is a dividend in an amount that is equal to (or in excess of) 10% of your adjusted tax basis (or fair market value in certain circumstances) in a share of our common stock (5% in the case of Preferred Stock). If we pay an extraordinary dividend on our common stock or Preferred Stock that is treated as qualified dividend income and if you are an individual, estate or trust, then any loss derived by you from a subsequent sale or exchange of such common stock or Preferred Stock will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of such dividend.
There is no assurance that dividends you receive from us will be eligible for the preferential rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Dividends you receive from us that are not eligible for the preferential rates will be taxed at the ordinary income rates.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Stock and Preferred Stock
Provided that we are not a PFIC for any taxable year, you generally will recognize taxable gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized by you from such sale, exchange or other disposition and your tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if your holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S. source income or loss, as applicable, for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Your ability to deduct capital losses against ordinary income is subject to limitations.
Unearned Income Medicare Contribution Tax
Each U.S. holder who is an individual, estate or trust will generally be subject to a 3.8% Medicare tax on the lesser of (i) such U.S. holder’s “net investment income” for the relevant taxable year and (ii) the excess of such U.S. holder’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a certain threshold (which in the case of individuals will be between $125,000 and $250,000, depending on the individual’s circumstances). For this purpose, net investment income generally includes dividends on and capital gains from the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock, subject to certain exceptions. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the applicability of the Medicare tax to your income and gains from your ownership of our common stock or Preferred Stock.
PFIC Status
Special U.S. Federal income tax rules apply to you if you hold stock in a non-U.S. corporation that is classified as a PFIC for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In general, we will be treated as a PFIC in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either:
| (a) | at least 75% of our gross income for such taxable year consists of “passive income” (e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the active conduct of a rental business); or |
| (b) | at least 50% of the average value of our assets during such taxable year consists of “passive assets” (i.e., assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income). |
For purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, we will be treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of our subsidiary corporations in which we own at least 25% of the value of the subsidiary’s stock. Income we earned, or are deemed to earn, in connection with the performance of services will not constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income will generally constitute passive income (unless we are treated under certain special rules as deriving our rental income in the active conduct of a trade or business).
There are legal uncertainties involved in determining whether the income derived from time chartering activities constitutes rental income or income derived from the performance of services. In Tidewater Inc. v. United States, 565 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 2009), the Fifth Circuit held that income derived from certain time chartering activities should be treated as rental income rather than services income for purposes of a foreign sales corporation provision of the Code. In published guidance, however, the IRS states that it disagrees with the holding in Tidewater, and specifies that time charters should be treated as service contracts. Since we have chartered substantially all our vessels to unrelated charterers on the basis of voyage and time charters and since we expect to continue to do so, we believe that we are not now and have never been a PFIC. Our counsel, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, has provided us with an opinion that we should not be a PFIC based on certain representations we made to them, including the representation that Costamare Shipping, which manages the Company’s vessels, is not related to any charterer of the vessels, and of certain assumptions made by them, including the assumption that time charters of the Company will be arranged in a manner substantially similar to the terms of its existing time charters. However, we have not sought, and we do not expect to seek, an IRS ruling on this matter. As a result, the IRS or a court could disagree with our position. No assurance can be given that this result will not occur. In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner to avoid, to the extent possible, being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot assure you that the nature of our operations will not change in the future, or that we can avoid PFIC status in the future.
As discussed below, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, you generally would be subject to one of three different U.S. Federal income tax regimes, depending on whether or not you make certain elections. Additionally, for each year during which you own our common stock, we are a PFIC and the total value of all PFIC stock that you directly or indirectly own exceeds certain thresholds, you will be required to file IRS Form 8621 with your U.S. Federal income tax return to report your ownership of our common stock.
The PFIC rules are complex, and you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the PFIC rules, including the annual PFIC reporting requirement.
Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make a Timely QEF Election
If we were a PFIC and if you make a timely election to treat us as a “Qualifying Electing Fund” for U.S. Federal tax purposes (a “QEF Election”), you would be required to report each year your pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and our net capital gain for our taxable year that ends with or within your taxable year, regardless of whether we make any distributions to you. Such income inclusions would not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Your adjusted tax basis in our common stock or Preferred Stock would be increased to reflect such taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that had previously been taxed would result in a corresponding reduction in your adjusted tax basis in our common stock or Preferred Stock and would not be taxed again once distributed. You would generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock. Even if you make a QEF Election for one of our taxable years, if we were a PFIC for a prior taxable year during which you held our common stock or Preferred Stock and for which you did not make a timely QEF Election, you would also be subject to the more adverse rules described below under “Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make No Election”. Additionally, to the extent any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC, your election to treat us as a “Qualifying Electing Fund” would not be effective with respect to your deemed ownership of the stock of such subsidiary and a separate QEF Election with respect to such subsidiary is required.
You would make a QEF Election by completing and filing IRS Form 8621 with your U.S. Federal income tax return for the year for which the election is made in accordance with the relevant instructions. If we were to become aware that we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, we would notify all U.S. holders of such treatment and would provide all necessary information to any U.S. holder who requests such information in order to make the QEF Election described above with respect to us and the relevant subsidiaries.
Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make a Timely “Mark-to-Market” Election
Alternatively, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and, as we believe, our common stock or Preferred Stock is treated as “marketable stock”, you would be allowed to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common stock or Preferred Stock, provided you complete and file IRS Form 8621 with your U.S. Federal income tax return for the year for which the election is made in accordance with the relevant instructions. If that election is made, you generally would include as ordinary income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our common stock or Preferred Stock at the end of the taxable year over your adjusted tax basis in our common stock or Preferred Stock. You also would be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of your adjusted tax basis in our common stock or Preferred Stock over its fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election). Your tax basis in our common stock or Preferred Stock would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amount. Gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common stock or Preferred Stock would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included by you. However, to the extent any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC, your “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common stock or Preferred Stock would not apply to your deemed ownership of the stock of such subsidiary.
Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make No Election
Finally, if we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and if you did not make either a QEF Election or a “mark-to-market” election for that year, you would be subject to special rules with respect to (a) any excess distribution (that is, the portion of any distributions received by you on our common stock or Preferred Stock in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by you in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, your holding period for our common stock or Preferred Stock) and (b) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock. Under these special rules:
| (i) | the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over your aggregate holding period for our common stock or Preferred Stock; |
| (ii) | the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable year prior to the taxable year we were first treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. holder who does not make a QEF or a “mark-to-market” election would be taxed as ordinary income; and |
| (iii) | the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year. |
If you died while owning our common stock or Preferred Stock, your successor generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with respect to such stock for U.S. Federal tax purposes.
United States Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders
You are a “non-U.S. holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common stock (other than a partnership for U.S. tax purposes) and you are not a U.S. holder.
Distributions on Our Common Stock and Preferred Stock
You generally will not be subject to U.S. Federal income or withholding taxes on a distribution received from us with respect to our common stock or Preferred Stock, unless the income arising from such distribution is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If you are entitled to the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty with respect to that income, such income generally is taxable in the United States only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by you in the United States as required by such income tax treaty.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common Stock and Preferred Stock
You generally will not be subject to U.S. Federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock or Preferred Stock, unless:
| (a) | the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If you are entitled to the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty with respect to that gain, that gain generally is taxable in the United States only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by you in the United States as required by such income tax treaty; or |
| (b) | you are an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition and certain other conditions are met. |
Gain that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States (or so treated) generally will be subject to U.S. Federal income tax, net of certain deductions, at regular U.S. Federal income tax rates. If you are a corporate non-U.S. holder, your earnings and profits that are attributable to the effectively connected income (subject to certain adjustments) may be subject to an additional U.S. branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty).
United States Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, if you are a non-corporate U.S. holder, dividend payments (or other taxable distributions) made within the United States will be subject to information reporting requirements and backup withholding tax if you:
| (1) | fail to provide us with an accurate taxpayer identification number; |
| (2) | are notified by the IRS that you have failed to report all interest or dividends required to be shown on your Federal income tax returns; or |
| (3) | in certain circumstances, fail to comply with applicable certification requirements. |
If you are a non-U.S. holder, you may be required to establish your exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying your status on IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8ECI or W-8IMY, as applicable.
If you sell our common stock or Preferred Stock to or through a U.S. office or broker, the payment of the sales proceeds is subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information reporting unless you certify that you are a non-U.S. person, under penalties of perjury, or you otherwise establish an exemption. If you sell our common stock or Preferred Stock through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United States, then information reporting and backup withholding generally will not apply to that payment.
However, U.S. information reporting requirements (but not backup withholding) will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United States, if you sell our common stock or Preferred Stock through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is a U.S. person or has certain other connections with the United States. Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Rather, you generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed your income tax liability by accurately completing and timely filing a refund claim with the IRS.
U.S. individuals and certain entities who hold certain specified foreign assets with values in excess of certain dollar thresholds are required to report such assets on IRS Form 8938 with their U.S. Federal income tax return, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for foreign assets held in accounts maintained by U.S. financial institutions). Stock in a foreign corporation, including our common stock or Preferred Stock, is a specified foreign asset for this purpose. Penalties apply for failure to properly complete and file Form 8938. You are encouraged to consult with your tax advisor regarding the filing of this form.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information as a foreign private issuer with the SEC. You may inspect reports and other information regarding registrants, such as us, that file electronically with the SEC without charge at a website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The information contained on or connected to our website is not part of this annual report.
Not applicable.
J. | Annual Report to Security Holders |
We intend to furnish the 2024 Annual Report provided to security holders in electronic format as an exhibit to a report on Form 6-K.
ITEM 11. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
A. | Quantitative Information About Market Risk |
The shipping industry is a capital intensive industry, requiring significant amounts of investment. Much of this investment is provided in the form of long-term debt. Our debt usually contains interest rates that fluctuate with the financial markets. Increasing interest rates could adversely impact future earnings. From time to time, we take positions in interest rate derivative contracts to manage interest costs and risk associated with changing interest rates with respect to our floating-rate debt. Generally, our approach is to economically hedge a portion of the floating-rate debt and we manage the exposure to the rest of our debt based on our outlook for interest rates and other factors.
Our interest expense is affected by changes in the general level of interest rates, primarily SOFR based rates. As an indication of the extent of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, an increase of 100 basis points in the reference rates would have decreased our net income and cash flows during the year ended December 31, 2024 by approximately $5.0 million based upon our debt level during 2024.
The following table sets forth the sensitivity of our long-term debt, including the effect on our consolidated statement of income of our derivative contracts to a 100 basis points increase in the aforementioned reference rates during the next five years on the same basis.
Net Difference in Earnings and Cash Flows (in millions of U.S. dollars):
Year | | Amount | |
2025 | | | 5.5 | |
2026 | | | 4.6 | |
2027 | | | 3.8 | |
2028 | | | 2.9 | |
2029 | | | 1.2 | |
Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest Rates
According to our long-term strategic plan to maintain stability in our interest rate exposure, we have decided to minimize our exposure to floating interest rates by entering into interest rate swap/cap agreements. To this effect, we have entered into interest rate swap/cap transactions with varying start and maturity dates, in order to proactively and efficiently manage our floating rate exposure. Furthermore, we enter into cross-currency swap agreements and foreign currency exchange agreements to manage our exposure to fluctuations of foreign currencies risks.
ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, established accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. All derivatives are recognized in the consolidated financial statements at their fair value. On the inception date of the derivative contract, and an ongoing basis, and after putting in place the formal documentation required by ASC 815 in order to designate these derivatives as hedging instruments, we designate the derivative as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow to be paid. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is qualified, designated and highly effective as a cash flow hedge is recorded in other comprehensive income until earnings are affected by the forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow and are then reported in earnings. Changes in the fair value of undesignated derivative instruments and the ineffective portion of designated derivative instruments are reported in earnings in the period in which those fair value changes have occurred.
(a) Interest rate swaps and interest rate caps that meet the criteria for hedge accounting: These interest rate swaps/caps are designed to hedge the variability of interest cash flows arising from floating rate debt, attributable to movements in three-month or six-month SOFR. According to our Risk Management Accounting Policy, after putting in place the formal documentation required by ASC 815 in order to designate these interest rate swaps/caps as hedging instruments as from their inception, these interest rate derivative instruments qualified for hedge accounting. Accordingly, only hedge ineffectiveness amounts arising from the differences in the change in fair value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item are recognized in earnings. Assessment and measurement of the effectiveness of these interest rate derivative instruments are performed at each reporting period. For qualifying cash flow hedges, the fair value gain or loss associated with the effective portion of the cash flow hedge is recognized initially in “Other comprehensive income” within stockholders’ equity and recognized in the consolidated statement of income in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the consolidated statement of income immediately.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2024, we had interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements with an outstanding notional amount of $1,137.8 million and $805.0 million, respectively. The fair value of these interest rate swaps and caps outstanding at December 31, 2023 and 2024, amounted to an asset of $47.1 million and an asset of $31.6 million, respectively, and these are included in the related consolidated balance sheets. The maturity of these interest rate swaps and caps range between June 2026 and March 2031.
(b) Interest rate swaps and interest rate caps that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting: As of December 31, 2023 and 2024, we did not hold any interest rate swaps or interest rate caps that did not qualify for hedge accounting.
(c) Cross currency swap agreements that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting: We have entered into two cross-currency swap agreements, which converted our variability of the interest and principal payments in Euro into USD functional currency cash flows with specific borrowings that were repaid in 2024, in order to hedge our exposure to fluctuations deriving from Euro. As of December 31, 2024, we had two cross-currency swap agreements that are designated as cash flow hedging instruments for accounting purposes and they do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. As of December 31, 2024, these two cross-currency swap agreements had an aggregate outstanding notional amount of $122.4 million and their fair value amounted to a liability of $18.4 million. Both mature in November 2025.
(d) Foreign Currency Exchange Agreements: We generate all of our revenue in U.S. dollars, but a substantial portion of our vessel operating expenses, primarily crew wages, are in currencies other than U.S. dollars (mainly in Euro), and any gain or loss we incur as a result of the U.S. dollar fluctuating in value against those currencies is included in vessel operating expenses. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 14% of our outstanding accounts payable were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (mainly in Euro). We hold cash and cash equivalents mainly in U.S. dollars.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company was engaged in 12 Euro/U.S. dollar contracts totaling $39.6 million at an average forward rate of Euro/U.S. dollar 1.0837 expiring in monthly intervals up to December 2025.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company was engaged in 24 Euro/U.S. dollar contracts totaling $78.6 million at an average forward rate of Euro/U.S. dollar 1.0730 expiring in monthly intervals up to December 2025.
We recognize these financial instruments on our balance sheet at their fair value. These foreign currency forward contracts do not qualify as hedging instruments, and thus we recognize changes in their fair value in our earnings.
Freight Derivatives
From time to time, we take positions in freight derivatives, mainly through forward freight agreements. If we take positions in freight derivatives, we could suffer losses in the settling or termination of these agreements. This could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we entered into a series of forward freight agreements. We use the freight derivatives to establish market positions. We also use the freight derivatives as an economic hedge to reduce the risk on specific vessels trading in the spot market. Our forward freight agreements are cleared on a daily basis through clearing houses. Customary requirements for trading in forward freight agreements include the maintenance of initial and variation margins based on expected volatility, open position and mark to market of the contracts. Our freight derivatives do not qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes and as a result changes in the fair value of such instruments are recorded in earnings in the period in which those fair value changes have occurred.
As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of our outstanding freight derivatives was a net liability of $19.2 million. An increase in the daily forward rates of $5,000 would increase the fair value of our outstanding freight derivatives by $43.5 million and vice versa, as of December 31, 2024. In 2024, we recorded a net loss on our freight derivatives of $47.7 million.
Bunker Swap Agreements
From time to time, we enter into bunker swap agreements to manage our exposure to fluctuations of bunker prices associated with the consumption of bunkers by our vessels. Bunker swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange cash flows at a fixed price on bunkers, where volume, time period and price are agreed in advance. If we take positions in bunker swaps or other derivative instruments we could suffer losses in the settling or termination of these agreements. This could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we entered into a series of bunker swaps. We use bunker swaps as an economic hedge to reduce the risk on bunker price differentials. Our bunker swaps do not qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes and as a result changes in the fair value of such instruments are recorded in earnings in the period in which those fair value changes have occurred. Bunker swaps are treated as assets/liabilities until they are settled.
As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of our outstanding bunker swap agreements was a net liability of $0.4 million. An increase in the daily forward prices of $100 would increase the fair value of our outstanding bunker derivatives by $4.6 million and vice versa, as of December 31, 2024. In 2024, we recorded a net gain of $3.8 million on our bunker swaps.
EUA futures agreements
From time to time, we enter into EUA futures agreements to manage our exposure to emissions. We use EUA futures as an economic hedge to reduce the risk on EUAs price differentials. Our EUA futures agreements do not qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes and, as a result, changes in the fair value of such instruments are recorded in earnings in the period in which those fair value changes have occurred. EUA futures agreements are treated as assets/liabilities until they are settled.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we entered into a series of EUA futures agreements. As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of our outstanding EUA futures agreements was an asset of $0.3 million. An increase in the daily forward prices of €10 would increase the fair value of our outstanding EUA derivatives by $0.2 million and vice versa, as of December 31, 2024. In 2024, we recorded a net gain of $0.3 million on our EUA futures agreements.
Inflation
We do not consider inflation to be a significant risk to our business in the current environment.
ITEM 12. | DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES |
Not applicable.
ITEM 13. | DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES |
Please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources”.
ITEM 14. | MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
A. | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders |
We adopted a stockholder rights plan on October 19, 2010, that authorizes the issuance to our existing stockholders of preferred share rights and additional shares of common stock if any third party seeks to acquire control of a substantial block of our common stock. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association— Stockholder Rights Plan” included in this annual report for a description of the stockholder rights plan.
ITEM 15. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
A. | Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2024. Based on our evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2024.
B. | Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In making its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, used the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (“COSO”).
Management concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A., our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the financial statements included herein and our internal control over financial reporting and has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 which is incorporated by reference into Item 15.C. below.
C. | Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm |
The attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting issued by the registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements, Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A., appears under Item 18 and such report is incorporated herein by reference.
D. | Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
During the period covered by this annual report, we made no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16A. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT |
Our Audit Committee consists of two independent directors, Vagn Lehd Møller and Charlotte Stratos, who is the chairperson of the committee. Our board of directors has determined that Charlotte Stratos, whose biographical details are included in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management”, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined under current SEC regulations.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all officers and employees of our Company, a copy of which is posted on our website, and may be viewed at http://www.costamare.com/ethics. The information contained on or connected to our website is not part of this annual report.
We will also provide a paper copy of this document free of charge upon written request by our stockholders. Stockholders may direct their requests to the attention of Anastassios Gabrielides, Secretary, Costamare Inc., 7 rue du Gabian, MC 98000 Monaco. No waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics have been granted to any person during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
ITEM 16C. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A., an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our annual financial statements acting as our independent auditor for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024.
The chart below sets forth the total amount billed and accrued for Ernst & Young services performed in 2024 and 2023 and breaks down these amounts by the category of service.
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Audit fees | | € | 1,105,000 | | | € | 800,000 | |
Audit-related fees | | € | 12,000 | | | € | 18,000 | |
Tax fees | | € | 18,769 | | | € | 32,314 | |
All other fees | | | | | | | | |
Total fees | | | | | | | | |
Audit Fees
Audit fees represent compensation for professional services rendered for the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, for the audit of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for the review of the interim financial information. Audit fees also include fees for any services associated with audits of subsidiaries of the Company and with registration statements, reports and documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees represent compensation for assurance professional services rendered that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements and are not included in “Audit Fees.”
Tax fees
Tax fees include fees billed for tax compliance services, including services such as tax planning and advice for the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024.
All other fees
All other fees in 2023 and 2024 amounted to nil and nil, respectively, and relate to permissible non-audit services. All other fees are approved by the Audit Committee.
Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
The audit committee charter sets forth our policy regarding retention of the independent auditors, giving the audit committee responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditors. The audit committee charter provides that the committee is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance the retention of the independent auditors for the performance of all audit and lawfully permitted non-audit services. The chairman of the audit committee or, in the absence of the chairman, any member of the audit committee designated by the chairman, has authority to approve in advance any lawfully permitted non-audit services and fees. The audit committee is authorized to establish other policies and procedures for the pre-approval of such services and fees. Where non-audit services and fees are approved under delegated authority, the action must be reported to the full audit committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
ITEM 16D.
| EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES |
None.
ITEM 16E. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS |
On November 30, 2021, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing total repurchases of us to a maximum of $150 million of our common shares and up to $150 million of our preferred shares. Shares may be purchased from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions, or other financial arrangements at times and prices that are considered to be appropriate by the Company. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company acquired, under the share purchase program, 4,736,702 common shares for a total amount of $60.1 million, with the average purchase price of $12.69 per share, including commissions. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company acquired, under the share purchase program, 6,267,808 common shares for a total amount of $60.0 million, with the average purchase price of $9.57 per share, including commissions. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not acquire any common shares under the share purchase program.
Set forth below are the common shares purchased or received in 2024 by our chief executive officer and chairman, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, and entities controlled by Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos.
| | Total Number of Common Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share ($) | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
January 2024 | | | | | | | | |
February 2024 | | | 376,678 | (1) | | | | | |
March 2024 | | | 74,800 | (2) | | | | | |
April 2024 | | | | | | | | | |
May 2024 | | | 330,718 | (1) | | | | | |
June 2024 | | | 74,800 | (2) | | | | | |
July 2024 | | | | | | | | | |
August 2024 | | | 151,830 | (1) | | | | | |
September 2024 | | | 74,800 | (2) | | | | | |
October 2024 | | | | | | | | | |
November 2024 | | | | | | | | | |
December 2024 | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 1,158,426 | | | | | | |
(1) | These shares were issued by the Company pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. |
(2) | These shares were issued to Costamare Services by the Company pursuant to the Services Agreement in exchange for services provided to the Company’s vessel-owning subsidiaries. |
ITEM 16F. | CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT |
Not Applicable.
ITEM 16G. | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Statement of Significant Differences Between our Corporate Governance Practices and the New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Standards for U.S. Non-Controlled Issuers
Overview
Pursuant to certain exceptions for foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with certain of the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. However, pursuant to Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and the requirements of Form 20-F, we are required to state any significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the practices required by the NYSE. We believe that our established practices in the area of corporate governance are in line with the spirit of the NYSE standards and provide adequate protection to our stockholders. The significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE standards applicable to listed U.S. companies are set forth below.
Independent Directors
Pursuant to NYSE Rule 303A.01, the NYSE requires that listed companies have a majority of independent directors. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our bylaws, our board of directors consists of a majority of non-independent directors.
Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee
NYSE Rules 303A.04 and 303A.05 require that a listed U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, each composed entirely of independent directors. As permitted under Marshall Islands law, we have a combined corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee, which at present is composed wholly of two independent directors and one non-independent director.
NYSE Rules 303A.02 and 303A.05, contains independence requirements for compensation committee directors and compensation committee advisers for U.S. listed companies, as required by Dodd-Frank. Marshall Islands law does not have similar requirements, therefore we may not adhere to these new requirements.
Audit Committee
Pursuant to NYSE Rule 303A.07, the NYSE requires that the audit committee of a listed U.S. company have a minimum of three members. As permitted under Marshall Islands law, our audit committee consists of two members.
ITEM 16H. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE |
Not Applicable.
ITEM 16I. | DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS |
Not Applicable.