Item 8.01. Other Events.
On December 1, 2021, SLR Investment Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with SLR Senior Investment Corp., a Maryland corporation (“SUNS”), Solstice Merger Sub, Inc., a Maryland corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and SLR Capital Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and investment adviser to each of the Company and SUNS (the “SLR Capital Partners”). The Merger Agreement provides that, subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into SUNS, with SUNS continuing as the surviving company and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”), and, immediately thereafter, SUNS will merge with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving company (together with the Merger, the “Mergers”).
On January 17, 2022, a stockholder complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, against the Company and the members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “SLRC Board”), entitled Gates v. SLR Investment Corp., et al., No. 1:22-cv-00261 (the “Gates Complaint”). On January 21, 2022, a stockholder complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the Company and the members of the SLRC Board, entitled Shumacher v. SLR Investment Corp., et al., No. 1:22-cv-00576 (the “Shumacher Complaint”). On January 31, 2022, two putative class action stockholder complaints were filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland against SUNS and the members of the Board of Directors of SUNS (the “SUNS Board”), captioned respectively Neal v. Gross, et al., No. 24-C-22-000557 (Md. Cir. Ct. Baltimore City) (the “Neal Complaint”), and Tobin v. Gross, et al., 24-C-22-000558 (Md. Cir. Ct. Baltimore City) (the “Tobin Complaint”). On February 8, 2022, a stockholder complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against SUNS and the members of the SUNS Board, entitled Kershner v. SLR Senior Investment Corp., et al., No. 1:22-cv-01096 (the “Kershner Complaint”). On February 21, 2022, a stockholder complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against SUNS and the members of the SUNS Board, entitled Sharp v. SLR Senior Investment Corp., et al., No. 1:22-cv-01418 (the “Sharp Complaint”). On February 22, 2022, a stockholder complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against SUNS, the members of the SUNS Board, the Company, and SLR Capital Partners, entitled Ciccotelli v. SLR Senior Investment Corp., et al., No. 1:22-cv-01454 (the “Ciccotelli Complaint”). On February 22, 2022, a stockholder complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, against SUNS and the members of the SUNS Board entitled Justice v. SLR Senior Investment Corp., et al., No. 2:22-cv-00673 (the “Justice Complaint” and together with the Gates Complaint, the Shumacher Complaint, the Neal Complaint, the Tobin Complaint, the Kershner Complaint, the Sharp Complaint, and the Ciccotelli Complaint, the “Merger Complaints”).
The Merger Complaints seek, among other things, supplemental disclosures be made to the joint definitive proxy statement/prospectus initially filed on December 16, 2021 (the “Proxy Statement”) to address the alleged materially misleading and incomplete disclosures and to enjoin the closing of the Merger.
The Company, SUNS, the SLRC Board and the SUNS Board believe that the Company and SUNS have previously disclosed all information required to be disclosed to ensure that their respective stockholders can make an informed vote at the Special Meeting (as defined below) and that the additional disclosures requested by the plaintiffs are immaterial. Accordingly, the Company, SUNS, the SLRC Board and the SUNS Board believe these claims are without merit. However, in order to reduce the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, to reduce the risk of any potential delay of the consummation of the Mergers, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Proxy Statement as described in this Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Report”). Nothing in this Report shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, the Company, the SLRC Board, SUNS and the SUNS Board specifically deny all allegations in the Merger Complaints that any additional disclosure was or is required.
The SLRC Board, including all of the independent directors, continues to unanimously recommend that the Company’s stockholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting vote “FOR” the Merger Stock Issuance Proposal (as defined in the Proxy Statement).