Shareholders Equity And Share Based Payments Stock Warrant [Text Block] | 11. WARRANTS Number of Warrants Weighted-Average Outstanding and exercisable, March 31, 2015 10,823,450 1.35 Issued 7,225,625 1.35 Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2015 18,049,075 1.35 Exercised (148,787) (0.80) Outstanding and exercisable, March 31, 2016 17,900,288 1.35 Exercised (262,045) (0.80) Outstanding and exercisable, June 30, 2016 17,638,243 1.36 In February 2016, a warrant holder exercised 148,787 45,508 262,045 51,249 Common share purchase warrants Exercise Number of Expiry Date 1.40 7,735,750 February 26, 2019 1.40 1,212,500 March 27, 2019 1.40 891,250 March 31, 2019 1.40 Note 9(i) 3,115,000 April 21, 2019 1.40 Note 9 (ii) 1,418,750 May 27, 2019 1.40 Note 9(iii) 2,035,000 June 30, 2019 0.80 Note (9 i to iii) 1,229,993 February 26, 2019 17,638,243 The weighted-average remaining contractual term of the outstanding warrants is 2.52 (March 31, 2016 2.77). Exchangeable share purchase warrants In 2014, the Company repaid loans of $180,940 plus accrued interest of $12,138 owing to investors introduced by Pope and Co. As part of this transaction the Company was committed to issue these lenders warrants exercisable into 349,522 Exchangeable Shares at an exercise price of $0.23 per share for a period ending March 21, 2017. During the year ended March 31, 2015, the Company issued these warrants. Warrant derivative liability The Company’s outstanding common share purchase warrants include price protection provisions that allow for a reduction in the exercise price of the warrants in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock or options, rights, warrants or securities convertible or exchangeable for shares of common stock at a price lower than the exercise price of the warrants. Simultaneously with any reduction to the exercise price, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of each of these warrants shall be increased based on a pre-defined formula. In addition, prior to the effectiveness of certain resale registration statements or if any such registration statements are no longer effective, the holder of the Company’s warrants, at their option, may exercise all or any part of the warrants in a “cashless” or “net-issue” exercise. The Company has the option to redeem the warrants for $ 0.001 The Company’s derivative instruments have been measured at fair value at inception and at each reporting period using a simulation model. The Company recognizes all of its warrants with price protection on its consolidated balance sheet as a derivative liability. Number Value ($) Balance at March 31, 2015 10,823,450 8,382,648 Warrants issued in April 21, 2015 financing 3,426,500 2,588,722 Warrants issued in May 27, 2015 financing 1,560,625 1,025,173 Warrants issued in June 30, 2015 financing 2,238,500 1,490,969 Change in fair value of warrant derivative liability - (7,419,643) Balance at December 31, 2015 18,049,075 6,067,869 Fair value of warrants exercised (148,787) (60,966) Change in fair value of warrant derivative liability - (870,913) Balance at March 31, 2016 17,900,288 5,135,990 Change in fair value of warrant derivative liability - 434,621 Fair value of warrants exercised (262,045) (43,562) Balance at June 30, 2016 17,638,243 5,527,049 During the three month period ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded a loss of $391,059 on re-measurement of the warrant liability to fair value. The change is recorded as a change in fair value of warrant derivative liability within the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive (loss) income. Grant date Number of Expected Exercise Risk Dividend Expected Fair At Inception: February 26, 2015 7,735,750 4 1.4 0.44 % 0 % 51.83 % 464,784 February 26, 2015 773,575 4 0.8 0.44 % 0 % 51.83 % 85,590 March 27, 2015 1,212,500 3.92 1.4 0.43 % 0 % 52.37 % 950,913 March 27, 2015 121,250 3.92 0.8 0.43 % 0 % 52.37 % 85,412 March 31, 2015 891,250 3.91 1.4 0.41 % 0 % 52.45 % 696,582 March 31, 2015 89,125 3.91 0.8 0.41 % 0 % 52.45 % 62,708 April 21, 2015 3,115,000 3.85 1.4 0.68 % 0 % 51.54 % 2,371,956 April 21, 2015 311,500 3.85 0.8 0.68 % 0 % 51.54 % 216,766 May 27, 2015 1,418,750 3.76 1.4 0.46 % 0 % 51.74 % 933,065 May 27, 2015 141,875 3.76 0.8 0.46 % 0 % 51.74 % 92,108 June 30, 2015 2,035,000 3.66 1.4 0.37 % 0 % 52.94 % 1,356,512 June 30, 2015 203,500 3.66 0.8 0.37 % 0 % 52.94 % 134,457 At year end March 31, 2016: March 31, 2016 16,408,250 2.91 1.4 0.21 % 0 % 62.96 % 4,585,539 March 31, 2016 1,492,038 2.91 0.8 0.21 % 0 % 62.96 % 550,451 At Period End: June 30, 2016 16,408,250 2.66 1.4 0.26 % 0 % 70.77 % 5,003,830 June 30, 2016 1,229,993 2.66 0.8 0.26 % 0 % 70.77 % 523,219 In addition to the forgoing, the Company also utilized a holding cost to approximate the impact of a holder of the warrant to maintain a hedging strategy in which they maintained a short position. On analysis of comparable companies and other information the Company has determined that the use of 2.25% in the simulation model is a reasonable assumption. The warrant derivative liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because on initial recognition and again at each reporting period, it was valued using these significant inputs and assumptions that are unobservable in the market. Changes in the values assumed and used in the simulation model can materially affect the estimate of fair value. Generally, an increase in the market price of the Company’s common shares, an increase in the volatility of the Company’s common shares and an increase in the expected life would result in a directionally similar change in the estimated fair value of the warrant derivative liability. An increase in the risk free rate would result in a decrease in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability. The expected life is based on the remaining contractual term of the warrants. The risk free rate was based on U.S. treasury-note yields with terms commensurate with the remaining term of the warrants. Expected volatility over the expected term of the warrants is estimated based on consideration of historical volatility and other information. In addition to the assumptions above, the Company also took into consideration the probability of the Company’s participation in another round of financing, the type of such financing and the range of the stock price for the financing at that time. At each increment of the simulation, the daily volume weighted-average price was calculated. If this amount was 200% greater than the exercise price of the warrants at the time, and this threshold was maintained for 20 consecutive days, the simulation assumed the trigger of the Company’s option to redeem and the exercise of the warrants by the holder within thirty days. In the circumstance where the redemption was not triggered the warrant was valued at its discounted intrinsic value at maturity. | 10. WARRANTS Number of Warrants Weighted-Average Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2014 - - Issued 10,823,450 1.35 Outstanding and exercisable, March 31, 2015 10,823,450 1.35 Issued 7,225,625 1.35 Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2015 18,049,075 1.35 Issued 18,049,075 1.35 Exercised (148,787) (0.80) Outstanding and exercisable, March 31, 2016 17,900,288 1.35 In February 2016, a warrant holder exercised 148,787 45,508 Common share purchase warrants Exercise Number of Expiry Date 1.40 Note 8(vi) 7,735,750 February 26, 2019 0.80 Note 8(vi) 773,575 February 26, 2019 1.40 Note 8(viii) 1,212,500 March 27, 2019 0.80 Note 8(viii) 121,250 February 26, 2019 1.40 Note 8(ix) 891,250 March 31, 2019 0.80 Note 8(ix) 89,125 February 26, 2019 1.40 Note 8(x) 3,115,000 April 21, 2019 0.80 Note 8(x) 311,500 February 26, 2019 1.40 Note 8(xi) 1,418,750 May 27, 2019 0.80 Note 8(xi) 141,875 February 26, 2019 1.40 Note 8(xii) 2,035,000 June 30, 2019 0.80 Note 8(xii) 54,713 February 26, 2019 17,900,288 The weighted-average remaining contractual term of the outstanding warrants is 2.77 3.93 3.16 Exchangeable share purchase warrants In 2014 the Company repaid loans of $ 180,940 12,138 349,522 0.23 Warrant derivative liability The Company’s outstanding common share purchase warrants include price protection provisions that allow for a reduction in the exercise price of the warrants in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock or options, rights, warrants or securities convertible or exchangeable for shares of common stock at a price lower than the exercise price of the warrants. Simultaneously with any reduction to the exercise price, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of each of these warrants shall be increased based on a pre-defined formula. In addition, prior to the effectiveness of certain resale registration statements or if any such registration statements are no longer effective, the holder of the Company’s warrants, at their option, may exercise all or any part of the warrants in a “cashless” or “net-issue” exercise. The Company has the option to redeem the warrants for $0.001 per warrant if the daily volume weighted-average price of the common shares is 200% or more of the exercise price for twenty consecutive trading days provided there is an effective registration statement covering the common shares available throughout the thirty day period after the redemption date. The warrant holders then have thirty days to exercise the warrants or receive the redemption amount. The Company’s derivative instruments have been measured at fair value at inception and at each reporting period using a simulation model. The Company recognizes all of its warrants with price protection on its consolidated balance sheet as a derivative liability. Number Value ($) Warrants issued in February 26, 2015 financing Note 8(vi) 8,509,325 550,374 Warrants issued in March 27, 2015 financing Note 8(viii) 1,333,750 1,036,325 Warrants issued in March 31, 2015 financing Note 8(ix) 980,375 759,290 Change in fair value of warrant derivative liability 6,036,659 Balance at March 31, 2015 8,382,648 Warrants issued in April 21, 2015 financing Note 8(x) 3,426,500 2,588,722 Warrants issued in May 27, 2015 financing Note 8(xi) 1,560,625 1,025,173 Warrants issued in June 30, 2015 financing Note 8(xii) 2,238,500 1,490,969 Change in fair value of warrant derivative liability (7,419,643) Balance at December 31, 2015 6,067,869 Fair value of warrants exercised (60,966) Change in fair value of warrant derivative liability (870,913) Balance at March 31, 2016 5,135,990 During the year ended March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a loss of $ 548,046 8,290,601 1,382,984 7,742,555 484,124 During the three month period ended March 31, 2016, $ 870,913 Grant date Number of Expected Exercise Risk Dividend Expected Fair At Inception: February 26, 2015 7,735,750 4 1.4 0.44 % 0 % 51.83 % 464,784 February 26, 2015 773,575 4 0.8 0.44 % 0 % 51.83 % 85,590 March 27, 2015 1,212,500 3.92 1.4 0.43 % 0 % 52.37 % 950,913 March 27, 2015 121,250 3.92 0.8 0.43 % 0 % 52.37 % 85,412 March 31, 2015 891,250 3.91 1.4 0.41 % 0 % 52.45 % 696,582 March 31, 2015 89,125 3.91 0.8 0.41 % 0 % 52.45 % 62,708 April 21, 2015 3,115,000 3.85 1.4 0.68 % 0 % 51.54 % 2,371,956 April 21, 2015 311,500 3.85 0.8 0.68 % 0 % 51.54 % 216,766 May 27, 2015 1,418,750 3.76 1.4 0.46 % 0 % 51.74 % 933,065 May 27, 2015 141,875 3.76 0.8 0.46 % 0 % 51.74 % 92,108 June 30, 2015 2,035,000 3.66 1.4 0.37 % 0 % 52.94 % 1,356,512 June 30, 2015 203,500 3.66 0.8 0.37 % 0 % 52.94 % 134,457 At Period End: March 31, 2016 16,408,250 2.91 1.4 0.21 % 0 % 62.96 % 4,585,539 March 31, 2016 1,492,038 2.91 0.8 0.21 % 0 % 62.96 % 550,451 At Period End: December 31, 2015 16,408,250 3.16 1.4 0.65 % 0 % 53.58 % 5,315,536 December 31, 2015 1,640,825 3.16 0.8 0.65 % 0 % 53.58 % 752,333 At Period End: March 31, 2015 9,839,500 3.91 1.4 0.41 % 0 % 52.45 % 7,690,340 March 31, 2015 983,950 3.91 0.8 0.41 % 0 % 52.45 % 692,308 In addition to the forgoing, the Company also utilized a holding cost to approximate the impact of a holder of the warrant to maintain a hedging strategy in which they maintained a short position. On analysis of comparable companies and other information the Company has determined that the use of 2.25 The warrant derivative liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because on initial recognition and again at each reporting period, it was valued using these significant inputs and assumptions that are unobservable in the market. Changes in the values assumed and used in the simulation model can materially affect the estimate of fair value. Generally, an increase in the market price of the Company’s common shares, an increase in the volatility of the Company’s common shares and an increase in the expected life would result in a directionally similar change in the estimated fair value of the warrant derivative liability. An increase in the risk free rate would result in a decrease in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability. The expected life is based on the remaining contractual term of the warrants. The risk free rate was based on U.S. treasury-note yields with terms commensurate with the remaining term of the warrants. Expected volatility over the expected term of the warrants is estimated based on consideration of historical volatility and other information. In addition to the assumptions above, the Company also took into consideration the probability of the Company’s participation in another round of financing, the type of such financing and the range of the stock price for the financing at that time. At each increment of the simulation, the daily volume weighted-average price was calculated. If this amount was 200 |