UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-35255
C&J Energy Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 20-5673219 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
10375 Richmond Avenue, Suite 1910
Houston, Texas 77042
(Address of principal executive offices)
(713) 260-9900 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | x | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding at May 3, 2013, was 54,115,236.
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-i-
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 22,107 | | | $ | 14,442 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,256 at March 31, 2013 and $1,106 at December 31, 2012 | | | 166,320 | | | | 167,481 | |
Inventories, net | | | 52,577 | | | | 60,659 | |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 9,719 | | | | 3,984 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 3,295 | | | | 3,613 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 254,018 | | | | 250,179 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $98,438 at March 31, 2013 and $84,848 at December 31, 2012 | | | 455,663 | | | | 433,727 | |
Other assets: | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 196,512 | | | | 196,512 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 120,970 | | | | 123,487 | |
Deposits on equipment under construction | | | 874 | | | | 1,033 | |
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $1,624 at March 31, 2013 and $1,334 at December 31, 2012 | | | 3,558 | | | | 3,848 | |
Other noncurrent assets, net | | | 4,171 | | | | 3,971 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,035,766 | | | $ | 1,012,757 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 69,713 | | | $ | 69,617 | |
Payroll and related costs | | | 13,641 | | | | 10,896 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 13,838 | | | | 17,286 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 20,729 | | | | 4,029 | |
Customer advances and deposits | | | 1,097 | | | | 1,092 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 2,140 | | | | 2,122 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 121,158 | | | | 105,042 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 126,260 | | | | 132,551 | |
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations | | | 153,180 | | | | 173,705 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 1,700 | | | | 1,568 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 402,298 | | | | 412,866 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, par value of $0.01, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 54,025,942 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and 53,131,823 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 | | | 540 | | | | 531 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 232,772 | | | | 224,348 | |
Retained earnings | | | 400,156 | | | | 375,012 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 633,468 | | | | 599,891 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,035,766 | | | $ | 1,012,757 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-1-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSOF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Revenue | | $ | 276,051 | | | $ | 239,052 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Direct costs | | | 181,841 | | | | 137,992 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 37,146 | | | | 16,856 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 16,556 | | | | 7,845 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | 90 | | | | 397 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 40,418 | | | | 75,962 | |
Other expense: | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | | (1,660 | ) | | | (380 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | | | 66 | | | | (72 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other expense, net | | | (1,594 | ) | | | (452 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 38,824 | | | | 75,510 | |
Income tax expense | | | 13,680 | | | | 26,131 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 25,144 | | | $ | 49,379 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.95 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 0.92 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 52,534 | | | | 51,905 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 55,039 | | | | 53,715 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-2-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSOF CHANGESIN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Amounts in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | Additional | | | | | | | |
| | Number of | | | Amount, at | | | Paid-in | | | Retained | | | | |
| | Shares | | | $0.01 par value | | | Capital | | | Earnings | | | Total | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | 51,887 | | | | 519 | | | | 201,874 | | | | 192,662 | | | | 395,055 | |
Issuance of restricted stock | | | 780 | | | | 7 | | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 465 | | | | 5 | | | | 2,568 | | | | — | | | | 2,573 | |
Tax effect of stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,901 | | | | — | | | | 1,901 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18,012 | | | | — | | | | 18,012 | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 182,350 | | | | 182,350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | | 53,132 | | | | 531 | | | | 224,348 | | | | 375,012 | | | | 599,891 | |
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | | | 675 | | | | 7 | | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 219 | | | | 2 | | | | 1,746 | | | | — | | | | 1,748 | |
Tax effect of stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 780 | | | | — | | | | 780 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,905 | | | | — | | | | 5,905 | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 25,144 | | | | 25,144 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2013* | | | 54,026 | | | $ | 540 | | | $ | 232,772 | | | $ | 400,156 | | | $ | 633,468 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-3-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSOF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 25,144 | | | $ | 49,379 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 16,556 | | | | 7,845 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (5,973 | ) | | | 3,017 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 150 | | | | 150 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | 90 | | | | 397 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 5,905 | | | | 3,516 | |
Excess tax benefit from stock-based award activity | | | (782 | ) | | | (374 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 290 | | | | 147 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 1,702 | | | | (3,117 | ) |
Inventories | | | 8,082 | | | | (17,750 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (5,672 | ) | | | 3,489 | |
Accounts payable | | | 96 | | | | 1,447 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | (703 | ) | | | (4,668 | ) |
Accrued taxes | | | 17,480 | | | | 22,885 | |
Other | | | (45 | ) | | | 3,123 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 62,320 | | | | 69,486 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of and deposits on property, plant and equipment | | | (36,972 | ) | | | (38,759 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment | | | 295 | | | | 117 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (36,677 | ) | | | (38,642 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Payments on revolving debt, net | | | (20,000 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments of capital lease obligations | | | (508 | ) | | | — | |
Proceeds from stock options exercised | | | 1,748 | | | | 202 | |
Excess tax benefit from stock-based award activity | | | 782 | | | | 374 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | (17,978 | ) | | | 576 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 7,665 | | | | 31,420 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 14,442 | | | | 46,780 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 22,107 | | | $ | 78,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosure: | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 1,391 | | | $ | 253 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for taxes | | $ | 2,173 | | | $ | 309 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-4-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – Organization, Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
C&J Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was founded in Texas in 1997. Through its subsidiaries, the Company operates in three reportable segments: Stimulation and Well Intervention Services, Wireline Services and Equipment Manufacturing, providing services primarily to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies throughout the United States. The Company provides hydraulic fracturing, coiled tubing and other well stimulation services through its Stimulation and Well Intervention Services segment. The Company provides cased-hole wireline and other complementary services through its Wireline Services segment. In addition, the Company manufactures and repairs equipment and provides oilfield parts and supplies for third-party customers in the energy services industry, as well as fulfills the Company’s internal equipment demands, through its Equipment Manufacturing segment. See Note 6 – Segment Information for further discussion regarding the Company’s reportable segments. As used herein, references to the “Company” or “C&J” are to C&J Energy Services, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have not been audited by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, except that the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 is derived from audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for fair presentation have been included.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2013. The operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year.
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of C&J and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used in, but are not limited to, determining the following: allowance for doubtful accounts, recoverability of long-lived assets and intangibles, useful lives used in depreciation and amortization, income taxes and stock-based compensation. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Company’s operating environment changes.
-5-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Inventories
Inventories for the Stimulation and Well Intervention Services segment and the Wireline Services segment consist of finished goods, including equipment components, chemicals, proppants, and general supplies and materials for the segments’ operations. Inventories for the Equipment Manufacturing segment consist of manufacturing parts and work-in-process. See Note 6 – Segment Information for further discussion regarding the Company’s reportable segments.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market (net realizable value) on a first-in, first-out basis and appropriate consideration is given to deterioration, obsolescence and other factors in evaluating net realizable value. Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Manufacturing parts | | $ | 17,978 | | | $ | 21,551 | |
Work-in-process | | | 2,431 | | | | 1,523 | |
Finished goods | | | 32,777 | | | | 38,164 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total inventory | | | 53,186 | | | | 61,238 | |
Inventory reserve | | | (609 | ) | | | (579 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Inventory, net of reserve | | $ | 52,577 | | | $ | 60,659 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition
All revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is complete or the equipment has been delivered to the customer, the amount is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured, as follows:
Hydraulic Fracturing Revenue.The Company provides hydraulic fracturing services on either a spot market basis or under term contracts. Revenue is recognized and customers are invoiced upon the completion of each job, which can consist of one or more fracturing stages. Once a job has been completed to the customer’s satisfaction, a field ticket is written that includes charges for the service performed and the chemicals and proppants consumed during the course of the service. The field ticket may also include charges for the mobilization of the equipment to the location, additional equipment used on the job, if any, and other miscellaneous consumables. Rates for services performed on a spot market basis are based on an agreed-upon hourly spot market rate. Under term contracts, the Company’s customers are typically obligated to pay on a monthly basis for a specified number of hours of service, whether or not those services are actually utilized. To the extent customers use more than the specified contracted minimums, the Company will be paid a pre-agreed amount for the provision of such additional services. Certain of the Company’s term contracts have been extended at or prior to their expiration in the form of long-term pricing commitments. Under such pricing commitments, the Company’s customers typically commit to targeted utilization levels at agreed pricing, but without termination penalties or obligations to pay for services not utilized by the customer.
Coiled Tubing.The Company enters into arrangements to provide coiled tubing and other well stimulation services. Jobs for these services are typically short term in nature, lasting anywhere from a few hours to multiple days. Revenue is recognized upon completion of each day’s work based upon a completed field ticket. The field ticket includes charges for the mobilization of the equipment to the location, the service performed, the personnel on the job, additional equipment used on the job, if any, and miscellaneous consumables used throughout the course of the service. The Company typically charges the customer for these services on an hourly basis at agreed upon spot market rates.
-6-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Materials Consumed While Performing Services. The Company generates revenue from chemicals and proppants that are consumed while performing hydraulic fracturing services. For services performed on a spot market basis, the necessary chemicals and proppants are typically provided by the Company and the customer is billed for those materials at cost plus an agreed upon markup. For services performed on a contractual basis, when the chemicals and proppants are provided by the Company, the customer is billed for those materials at a negotiated contractual rate. When chemicals and proppants are supplied by the customer, the Company typically charges handling fees based on the amount of chemicals and proppants used.
In addition, ancillary to coiled tubing and other well stimulation services revenue, the Company generates revenue from various fluids and supplies that are necessarily consumed during those processes.
Wireline Revenue.Wireline revenue is generated from the performance of cased-hole wireline and other complementary services, including logging, perforating, pipe recovery, pressure testing and pumpdown services. These jobs are typically short term in nature, lasting anywhere from a few hours to multiple days. Revenue is recognized when the services and equipment are provided and the job is completed. The Company typically charges the customer on a per job basis for these services at agreed-upon spot market rates.
Equipment Manufacturing Revenue.The Company enters into arrangements to construct equipment, conduct equipment repair services and provide oilfield parts and supplies to third-party customers in the energy services industry. Revenue is recognized and the customer is invoiced upon the completion and delivery of each order to the customer.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation plans provide the ability to grant equity awards to officers, employees, consultants and non-employee directors. As of March 31, 2013, only nonqualified stock options and restricted stock had been granted under such plans. The Company values option grants based on the grant date fair value by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and values restricted stock grants based on the closing price of C&J’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Further information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation arrangements and the related accounting treatment can be found in Note 4 – Stock-Based Compensation.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease obligations. The recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. The carrying value of long-term debt and capital lease obligations approximate their fair value, as the interest rates approximate market rates.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes utilizing the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
-7-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. In assessing the likelihood and extent that deferred tax assets will be realized, consideration is given to projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. A valuation allowance is recorded when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more-likely-than-not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. Previously recognized tax positions are reversed in the first period in which it is no longer more-likely-than-not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination. Income tax related interest and penalties, if applicable, are recorded as a component of the provision for income tax expense. However, there were no amounts recognized relating to interest and penalties in the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock (“common shares”) outstanding during the applicable period and excludes shares subject to outstanding stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus, when their effect is dilutive, incremental shares consisting of shares subject to stock options and restricted stock.
The following is a reconciliation of the components of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the applicable periods:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributed to common shareholders | | $ | 25,144 | | | $ | 49,379 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 52,534 | | | | 51,905 | |
Effect of potentially dilutive common shares: | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 2,243 | | | | 1,810 | |
Restricted stock | | | 262 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding and assumed conversions | | | 55,039 | | | | 53,715 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.95 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 0.92 | |
| | | | | | | | |
-8-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
A summary of securities excluded from the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is presented below for the applicable periods:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | |
Unvested restricted stock | | | 1,095 | | | | — | |
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | |
Anti-dilutive stock options | | | 1,125 | | | | 1,184 | |
Anti-dilutive restricted stock | | | 1 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Potentially dilutive securities excluded as anti-dilutive | | | 1,126 | | | | 1,184 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentations. These reclassifications had no effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Note 2—Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Credit Facility
On April 19, 2011, the Company entered into a five-year $200.0 million senior secured revolving credit agreement, which was amended on June 5, 2012 and the borrowing base increased to $400.0 million (the “Credit Facility”). Loans under the Company’s Credit Facility are denominated in U.S. dollars and will mature on April 19, 2016. Outstanding loans bear interest at either LIBOR or a base rate, at the Company’s election, plus an applicable margin that ranges from 1.25% to 2.00% for base rate loans and from 2.25% to 3.00% for LIBOR loans, based upon the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio, which is the ratio of funded indebtedness to EBITDA for the Company on a consolidated basis. The Company is also required to pay a quarterly commitment fee of 0.5% on the unused portion of the Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2013, $150.0 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, along with $0.7 million in letters of credit, leaving $249.3 million available for borrowing. All obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of the Company other than any immaterial subsidiaries.
The Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and restrictive covenants including financial reporting, governance and notification requirements. Among other restrictions, the Company is unable to issue dividends under the terms of the Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants under the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2013.
Capitalized terms used in this Note 2 – Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations but not defined herein are defined in the Credit Facility.
Capital Lease Obligations
The Company leases certain service equipment, with the intent to purchase, under non-cancelable capital leases. The terms of these contracts range from three to four years with varying payment dates throughout each month.
-9-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3—Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortization Period | | March 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
Trade name | | 10-15 years | | $ | 27,275 | | | $ | 27,275 | |
Customer relationships | | 8-15 years | | | 100,193 | | | | 100,193 | |
Non-compete—Casedhole | | 4 years | | | 1,600 | | | | 1,600 | |
IPR&D—Total | | Indefinite | | | 854 | | | | 854 | |
Trade name—Total | | Indefinite | | | 6,247 | | | | 6,247 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 136,169 | | | | 136,169 | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | (15,199 | ) | | | (12,682 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Intangible assets, net | | | | $ | 120,970 | | | $ | 123,487 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Note 4—Stock-Based Compensation
The C&J Energy Services, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 LTIP”) provides for the grant of stock-based awards to the Company’s officers, employees, consultants and non-employee directors. The following types of awards are available for issuance under the 2012 LTIP: incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options; stock appreciation rights; restricted stock; restricted stock units; dividend equivalent rights; and share awards. To date, only nonqualified stock options and restricted stock have been awarded under the 2012 LTIP. A total of 4,300,000 shares of common stock were authorized and approved for issuance under the 2012 LTIP, subject to certain adjustments. Of these shares, 2,951,330 shares are available for issuance under the 2012 LTIP as of March 31, 2013.
Prior to the approval of the 2012 LTIP, all stock-based awards granted to the Company’s employees were granted under the C&J Energy Services, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan (the “2010 Plan”), and prior to December 23, 2010, all stock-based awards granted to employees were granted under the C&J Energy Services, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan” and, together with the 2010 Plan, the “Prior Plans”). Only nonqualified stock options were awarded under the Prior Plans.
Stock Options
The fair value of each option award granted under the 2012 LTIP and the Prior Plans is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Due to the Company’s lack of historical volume of option activity, the expected term of options granted is derived using the “plain vanilla” method. In addition, expected volatilities have been based on comparable public company data, with consideration given to the Company’s limited historical data. The Company makes estimates with respect to employee termination and forfeiture rates of the options within the valuation model. The risk-free rate is based on the approximate U.S. Treasury yield rate in effect at the time of grant. For options granted prior to the Company’s initial public offering, which closed on August 3, 2011, the calculation of the Company’s stock price involved the use of different valuation techniques, including a combination of an income and/or market approach. Determination of the fair value was a matter of judgment and often involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The following table presents the assumptions used in determining the fair value of option awards totaling 53,000 grants during the three months ended March 31, 2012. No stock options were granted by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
-10-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, |
| | 2012 |
Expected volatility | | 75% |
Expected dividends | | None |
Exercise price | | $16.88-$18.76 |
Expected term (in years) | | 5 - 6 |
Risk-free rate | | 1.0%-1.4% |
As of March 31, 2013, the Company had 6,040,726 options outstanding to employees, consultants and non-employee directors. Options granted under the 2012 LTIP and the Prior Plans expire ten years from the date they are granted and generally vest over a three-year period.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock is valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, 691,080 shares of restricted stock were granted to employees and non-employee directors under the 2012 LTIP at fair market values ranging from $22.81 to $23.69 per share.
Note 5—Commitments and Contingencies
Hydraulic Fracturing Term Contracts
The Company has entered into multi-year take-or-pay contracts with certain customers. Under the term contracts, these customers are typically obligated to pay on a monthly basis for a specified number of hours of service, whether or not those services are actually utilized. To the extent customers use more than the specified contract minimums, the Company will be paid for the provision of such additional services based on rates stipulated in the contract. The revenue related to these contracts is recognized on the earlier of the passage of time under terms set forth in each contract or as the services are performed. The contracts expire at various dates through 2014.
Litigation
The Company is, and from time to time may be, involved in claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Because there are inherent uncertainties in the ultimate outcome of such matters, it is presently not possible to determine the ultimate outcome of any pending or potential claims or litigation against the Company; however, management believes that the outcome of those matters that are presently known to the Company will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operation or liquidity.
-11-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 6—Segment Information
In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 280Segment Reporting, the Company routinely evaluates whether it has separate operating and reportable segments. The Company has determined that it operates in three reportable segments: Stimulation and Well Intervention Services, Wireline Services and Equipment Manufacturing. This determination is made based on the following factors: (1) the Company’s chief operating decision maker is currently managing each segment as a separate business and evaluating the performance of each segment and making resource allocation decisions distinctly and expects to do so for the foreseeable future, and (2) discrete financial information for each segment is available. The following is a brief description of the Company’s three segments:
Stimulation and Well Intervention Services. This segment has two related service lines providing hydraulic fracturing and coiled tubing and other well stimulation services, with a focus on complex, technically demanding well completions.
Wireline Services. This segment provides cased-hole wireline services and other complementary services, including logging, perforating, pipe recovery, pressure testing and pumpdown services.
Equipment Manufacturing. This segment constructs equipment, conducts equipment repair services and provides oilfield parts and supplies for the Company’s Stimulation and Well Intervention Services and Wireline Services segments, as well as for third-party customers in the energy services industry.
The following tables set forth certain financial information with respect to the Company’s reportable segments. Included in “Corporate and Other” are intersegment eliminations and costs associated with activities of a general corporate nature.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stimulation & Well Intervention Services | | | Wireline Services | | | Equipment Manufacturing | | | Corporate and Other | | | Total | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Three months ended March 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue from external customers | | $ | 212,687 | | | $ | 62,129 | | | $ | 1,235 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 276,051 | |
Inter-segment revenues | | | 11,578 | | | | — | | | | 18,700 | | | | (30,278 | ) | | | — | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | 54,382 | | | | 17,650 | | | | 1,874 | | | | (16,603 | ) | | | 57,303 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 10,507 | | | | 5,832 | | | | 402 | | | | (185 | ) | | | 16,556 | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 43,847 | | | | 11,691 | | | | 1,470 | | | | (16,590 | ) | | | 40,418 | |
Capital expenditures | | | 25,399 | | | | 12,409 | | | | 270 | | | | (1,106 | ) | | | 36,972 | |
As of March 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 593,873 | | | $ | 386,347 | | | $ | 81,081 | | | $ | (25,535 | ) | | $ | 1,035,766 | |
Goodwill | | | 60,339 | | | | 131,455 | | | | 4,718 | | | | — | | | | 196,512 | |
Three months ended March 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue from external customers | | $ | 226,545 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 12,507 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 239,052 | |
Inter-segment revenues | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,841 | | | | (15,841 | ) | | | — | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | 91,635 | | | | — | | | | 3,690 | | | | (11,193 | ) | | | 84,132 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 6,688 | | | | — | | | | 1,042 | | | | 115 | | | | 7,845 | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 84,548 | | | | — | | | | 2,649 | | | | (11,235 | ) | | | 75,962 | |
Capital expenditures | | | 42,611 | | | | — | | | | 748 | | | | (4,600 | ) | | | 38,759 | |
As of March 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 562,027 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 63,625 | | | $ | (8,873 | ) | | $ | 616,779 | |
Goodwill | | | 60,339 | | | | — | | | | 4,718 | | | | — | | | | 65,057 | |
-12-
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Management evaluates segment performance and allocates resources based on total earnings before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, net gain or loss on disposal of assets, transaction costs, and non-routine items including loss on early extinguishment of debt and legal settlement charges (“Adjusted EBITDA”), because Adjusted EBITDA is considered an important measure of each segment’s performance. In addition, management believes that the disclosure of Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of each segment’s operating performance allows investors to make a direct comparison to competitors, without regard to differences in capital and financing structure. Investors should be aware, however, that there are limitations inherent in using Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of overall profitability because it excludes significant expense items. An improving trend in Adjusted EBITDA may not be indicative of an improvement in the Company’s profitability. To compensate for the limitations in utilizing Adjusted EBITDA as an operating measure, management also uses U.S. GAAP measures of performance, including operating income and net income, to evaluate performance, but only with respect to the Company as a whole and not on a segment basis.
As required under Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, included below is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to net income, which is the nearest comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure (in thousands).
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 57,303 | | | $ | 84,132 | |
Interest expense, net | | | (1,660 | ) | | | (380 | ) |
Transaction costs | | | (173 | ) | | | — | |
Provision for income taxes | | | (13,680 | ) | | | (26,131 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (16,556 | ) | | | (7,845 | ) |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | (90 | ) | | | (397 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 25,144 | | | $ | 49,379 | |
| | | | | | | | |
-13-
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”) includes certain statements and information that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “ensure,” “expect,” “if,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecasts,” “predict,” “outlook,” “aim,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “potential,” “would,” “may,” “probable,” “likely,” and similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes, and the negative thereof, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which are not generally historical in nature, include those that express a belief, expectation or intention regarding our future activities, plans and goals and our current expectations with respect to, among other things:
| • | | our future revenues, income and operating performance; |
| • | | our ability to sustain and improve our utilization and margins; |
| • | | our ability to enter into term contacts and/or long-term pricing commitments at acceptable prices; |
| • | | operating cash flows and availability of capital; |
| • | | the timing and success of future acquisitions and other special projects; |
| • | | future capital expenditures; and |
| • | | our ability to finance equipment, working capital and capital expenditures. |
Forward-looking statements are not assurances of future performance and actual results could differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs, forecasts for our existing operations, experience, expectations and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and their effect on us, and other factors believed to be appropriate. Although management believes the expectations and assumptions reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, no assurance can be given that these assumptions are accurate or that any of these expectations will be achieved (in full or at all). Our forward-looking statements involve significant risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Known material factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | | a sustained decrease in domestic spending by the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry; |
| • | | a decline in or substantial volatility of crude oil and natural gas commodity prices; |
| • | | overcapacity and competition in our industry; |
| • | | increased pressures on pricing due to competition and economic conditions; |
| • | | the loss of or interruption in operations of one or more key suppliers; |
-14-
| • | | unanticipated costs, delays, regulatory compliance requirements and other difficulties in executing our long-term growth strategy, including those related to expansion into new geographic regions and new business lines; |
| • | | the incurrence of significant costs and liabilities in the future resulting from our failure to comply, or our compliance with, new or existing environmental regulations or an accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment; |
| • | | the loss of, or inability to attract new, key management personnel; |
| • | | the loss of, or failure to pay amounts when due by, one or more significant customers; |
| • | | a shortage of qualified workers; |
| • | | operating hazards inherent in our industry; |
| • | | accidental damage to or malfunction of equipment; |
| • | | an increase in interest rates; |
| • | | the potential inability to comply with the financial and other covenants in our debt agreements as a result of reduced revenues and financial performance or our inability to raise sufficient funds through assets sales or equity issuances should need to raise funds through such methods; and |
| • | | the potential failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. |
For additional information regarding known material factors that could affect our operating results and performance, please read (1) “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and (2) “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q, as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Should one or more of these known material risks occur, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance, achievements or plans could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
-15-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, together with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Unless the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” the “Company,” “C&J” or like terms refers to C&J Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including the financial results of Total and Casedhole Solutions (each as described below) from their respective acquisition dates.
This section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in any forward-looking statement because of various factors, including those described in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” of this Form 10-Q.
Overview
We are an independent provider of premium hydraulic fracturing, coiled tubing, wireline and other complementary services with a focus on complex, technically demanding well completions. These services are provided to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies throughout the United States. We also manufacture and repair equipment to fulfill our internal needs and for third-party companies in the energy services industry. We operate in three reportable segments: Stimulation and Well Intervention Services, Wireline Services and Equipment Manufacturing. We provide hydraulic fracturing, coiled tubing and other well stimulation services through our Stimulation and Well Intervention Services segment. We provide cased-hole wireline and other complementary services through our Wireline Services segment, which we added in June 2012 with the acquisition of Casedhole Holdings, Inc. (together with its operating subsidiary, Casedhole Solutions, Inc., “Casedhole Solutions”). Through our Equipment Manufacturing segment, which we added with the acquisition of Total E&S Inc. (“Total”) in April 2011, we manufacture and repair equipment and provide oilfield parts and supplies for companies in the energy services industry. Through Total, we fulfill our internal equipment demands and have centralized company-wide inventory management. Our three segments are described in more detail under “Our Operating Segments”.
Our Operating Segments
Stimulation and Well Intervention Services
Our Stimulation and Well Intervention Services segment provides hydraulic fracturing, coiled tubing and other well stimulation services, with a focus on complex, technically demanding well completions.
Hydraulic Fracturing Services. Our hydraulic fracturing business currently consists of approximately 300,000 total horsepower capacity. We deployed a new 32,000 horsepower fleet at the end of January 2013 in the spot market, and took delivery of an additional 32,000 horsepower capacity fleet in early April 2013.
Our hydraulic fracturing operations contributed $173.8 million, or 63%, to our consolidated revenue and completed 1,698 fracturing stages during the first quarter of 2013, compared to $185.7 million of revenue and 1,614 fracturing stages during the fourth quarter of 2012. Hydraulic fracturing revenue for the first quarter of 2012 was $186.4 million, and 1,476 fracturing stages were completed. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we averaged monthly revenue per unit of horsepower of $218 compared to $256 for the fourth quarter of 2012 and $319 for the first quarter of 2012. The decline
-16-
in revenue quarter over quarter was primarily due to lower hydraulic fracturing equipment utilization with respect to both contracted and spot market work, particularly in the latter half of the first quarter of 2013. Similarly, the decrease in revenue per horsepower from the fourth quarter of 2012 resulted from less contracted work as customers managed usage to minimum contracted hours, which generated increased spot market exposure at highly competitive pricing levels. We completed more stages quarter over quarter as a result of the additional horsepower that was deployed in January 2013.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we derived 33.6% of our consolidated revenues from term contracts. We currently have three term contracts in place covering an aggregate 114,000 hydraulic horsepower capacity, two of which are set to expire in mid-2013 and one of which is set to expire in early 2014. Our term contracts generally range from one year to three years. Under the term contacts, our customers are typically obligated to pay us on a monthly basis for a specified number of hours of service, whether or not those services are actually utilized. To the extent customers use more than the specified contract minimums, we will be paid a pre-agreed amount for the provision of such additional services. Some of our term contracts restrict the ability of the customer to terminate or require our customers to pay us a lump-sum early termination fee, generally representing all or a significant portion of the remaining economic value of the contracts to us. As a result of current market conditions, certain of our term contracts have been extended at or prior to their expiration in the form of long-term pricing commitments. Under such pricing commitments, our customers typically commit to targeted utilization levels at agreed pricing, but without termination penalties or obligations to pay for services not utilized by the customer.
We charge prevailing market prices per hour for work performed in the spot market. We may also charge fees for setup and mobilization of equipment depending on the job, additional equipment used on the job, if any, and other miscellaneous consumables. Generally, these fees and other charges vary depending on the equipment and personnel required for the job and market conditions in the region in which the services are performed. We also source chemicals and proppants that are consumed during the fracturing process. We charge our customers a fee for materials consumed in the process and a handling fee for any chemicals and proppants supplied by the customer. Materials charges reflect the cost of the materials plus a markup and are based on the actual quantity of materials used in the fracturing process. Due to the flexibility of our operating model, our revenue can fluctuate without having a material impact to earnings when our customers elect to source their own proppants. We believe that one of the benefits of working our hydraulic fracturing fleets on a spot market basis is that it serves as a marketing tool, giving us the opportunity to introduce our services to new customers and strengthen our relationships with existing customers.
Coiled Tubing and Other Well Stimulation Services. Our coiled tubing business currently consists of 20 coiled tubing units, having taken delivery of two new units in the first quarter of 2013. We have ordered four new coiled tubing units that we expect to be delivered in mid-2013.
Our coiled tubing operations contributed $36.4 million, or 13%, to our consolidated revenue, and we completed 1,057 coiled tubing jobs during the first quarter of 2013, compared to $38.4 million of revenue and 1,010 coiled tubing jobs for the fourth quarter of 2012 and $35.5 million and 908 coiled tubing jobs for the first quarter of 2012. Coiled tubing revenue decreased slightly from the fourth quarter of 2012 due to a change in the mix and type of work we encountered, as we performed a greater number of less service intensive jobs. Through our coiled tubing business, we also perform other well stimulation services, including pumpdown services for wireline and coiled tubing operations. These other services generated $2.5 million, or 1% of our consolidated revenue, during the first quarter of 2013, compared to $2.5 million for the previous quarter and $4.6 million for the prior year quarter. Revenue decreased slightly from the fourth quarter of 2012 due to reduced utilization.
-17-
Our coiled tubing and other well stimulation services are generally provided in the spot market at prevailing prices per hour, although we do have one contract in place with a major operator for dedicated coiled tubing and associated services. We may also charge fees for setup and mobilization of equipment depending on the job. The setup charges and hourly rates are determined by a competitive bid process and vary with the type of service to be performed, the equipment and personnel required for the job and market conditions in the region in which the service is performed. We also charge customers for the materials, such as stimulation fluids, nitrogen and coiled tubing materials that we use in each job. Materials charges reflect the cost of the materials plus a markup and are based on the actual quantity of materials used for the project.
Wireline Services Segment
Our Wireline Services segment, which we commenced with the acquisition of Casedhole Solutions on June 7, 2012, currently consists of 64 wireline units and 23 pumpdown units, as well as pressure control equipment. We currently plan to deploy one new wireline unit in 2013. Our Wireline Services segment contributed $62.1 million, or 23%, to our consolidated revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $53.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. Revenues from wireline operations increased from the previous quarter due to improved utilization levels, which were primarily due to targeted marketing activities.
Our Wireline Services segment provides cased-hole wireline and other complementary services, including logging, perforating, pipe recovery, pressure testing and pumpdown services, which are critical throughout a well’s lifecycle. Our services are generally provided at prevailing rates in the spot market on a job-by-job basis. The rates are determined by a competitive bid process and vary with the type of service to be performed, the equipment and personnel required for the job and market conditions in the region in which the service is performed. We have expertise in both horizontal and high-pressure, high-temperature completion applications and experience in the most complex and demanding operating environments, focusing on oily basins.
Equipment Manufacturing Segment
Our Equipment Manufacturing segment contributed $1.2 million, or less than 1%, to our consolidated revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $6.2 million of revenue for the fourth quarter of 2012 and $12.5 million of revenue for the first quarter of 2012. Our Equipment Manufacturing business has been negatively impacted by the excess equipment capacity across the pressure pumping industry, a trend that we believe is likely to continue over the near term.
Our Equipment Manufacturing segment constructs oilfield equipment, including hydraulic fracturing pumps, coiled tubing units, pressure pumping units, wireline units and other equipment, for our Stimulation and Well Intervention Services and Wireline Services segments, as well as for third party customers in the energy services industry. This segment also provides equipment repair services and oilfield parts and supplies to the energy services industry and to meet the needs of our Stimulation and Well Intervention Services and Wireline Services segments.
See Note 6 – Segment Information to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding our reportable segments.
General Trends and Outlook
We face many challenges and risks in the industry in which we operate. Although many factors contributing to these risks are beyond our ability to control, we continuously monitor these risks and have taken steps to mitigate them to the extent practicable. In addition, while we believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on available growth opportunities, we may not be able to achieve our business objectives and, consequently, our results of operations may be adversely affected. Please read this section in conjunction with the factors described in the sections titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” for additional information about the known material risks that we face.
-18-
Trends that we believe are affecting, and will continue to affect, our industry include:
Demand for Our Services.Our business depends on the capital spending programs of our customers. Our Stimulation and Well Intervention Services and Wireline Services segments are significantly driven by the exploration, development and production expenditures made by our customers, which also impacts sales by our Equipment Manufacturing segment to third-party customers in the energy services industry. These customers have historically tended to delay capital equipment projects, including maintenance and upgrades, during industry downturns, like the current one which has been characterized by excess equipment capacity across the U.S. hydraulic fracturing market. The oil and gas industry has traditionally been volatile, is highly sensitive to supply and demand cycles and is influenced by a combination of long-term and cyclical trends, including the current and expected future prices for oil and gas and the perceived stability and sustainability of those prices, as well as production depletion rates and the resultant levels of cash flows generated and allocated by exploration and production companies to their drilling and workover budgets. The volatility of the oil and gas industry, and the consequent impact on exploration and production activity, has adversely impacted, and could continue to adversely impact, the level of drilling and workover activity by our customers. This volatility affects the demand for our services and our ability to negotiate pricing at levels generating desirable margins, especially in our hydraulic fracturing business.
Due to the significant disparity between oil and natural gas prices on a Btu basis, much of the current horizontal drilling and completion related activity is concentrated in oily- and liquids-rich formations. Activity levels in natural gas-based areas in which we have a presence remain depressed due to the recent low prices of natural gas. Based on industry data, we believe this trend will continue over the near term. Our hydraulic fracturing operations encountered significant market pressure during the first quarter of 2013 as a result of the overcapacity of completion equipment in our oily- and liquids-rich based operating areas, coupled with a decline in rig count over the quarter. The hydraulic fracturing market remains highly competitive with activity levels in natural gas-based areas expected to remain depressed and spot market pricing not expected to increase during the second quarter.
In response to this difficult environment, we are focused on targeting customers who recognize the value we provide through efficiency gains that result in significant cost savings to them. From a long term perspective, the industry’s shift towards more advanced completion methods and greater rig efficiency levels are well aligned with our core strengths.
Competition.The markets in which we provide our Stimulation and Well Intervention Services and Wireline Services are highly competitive. Our competition includes many large and small oilfield service companies, including the largest integrated oilfield services companies. The sustained price disparity between oil and natural gas has led to the migration of equipment from gas-related areas, and resulted in challenging market conditions. We experienced lower utilization levels and significant pressure on pricing across our hydraulic fracturing business in the latter part of 2012, which continued through the first quarter of 2013. The impact to our hydraulic fracturing operations was greatest over the latter part of the quarter, as our exposure to a weakened spot market increased due to lower utilization by contracted customers, who generally managed to the minimum contractual hours. We expect the hydraulic fracturing market to remain highly competitive with spot market pricing not expected to increase during the second quarter.
Hydraulic Fracturing Legislation and Regulation. Hydraulic fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production of natural gas and/or oil from dense subsurface rock formations. The hydraulic fracturing process involves the injection of water, sand, and chemicals under pressure into the formation to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate production. The federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) provisions of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) to exclude hydraulic fracturing from the definition of “underground injection” and thereby exclude the process from direct federal regulation under the SDWA. The hydraulic
-19-
fracturing process is currently typically regulated by state oil and natural gas commissions. However, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has asserted federal regulatory authority over certain hydraulic fracturing activities involving the use of diesel, and has also adopted regulations requiring operators to capture rather than vent most gases that are brought to the surface during well completion activities, beginning in 2015. In addition, legislation has been introduced before Congress to provide for direct federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require public disclosure of chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. Also, many state governments have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could impose more stringent permitting, public disclosure, well construction, and operational requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations or otherwise seek to temporarily or permanently ban fracturing activities altogether. In addition to state laws, local land use restrictions, such as city ordinances, may restrict or prohibit the performance of well drilling in general or hydraulic fracturing in particular.
In addition, certain governmental reviews are either underway or being proposed that focus on environmental aspects of hydraulic fracturing practices. The EPA has commenced a study of the potential environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing on water resources. The EPA’s study includes 18 separate research projects addressing topics such as water acquisition, chemical mixing, well injection, flowback and produced water, and waste water treatment and disposal. The EPA has indicated that it expects to issue its study report in late 2014. In the interim, however, the EPA has utilized existing statutory authority under the SDWA, the Clean Water Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) to investigate and pursue actions against some oil and natural gas producers where EPA believes their activities may have impacted air quality or groundwater. Moreover, the EPA is developing effluent limitations for the treatment and discharge of wastewater resulting from hydraulic fracturing activities and plans to propose these standards by 2014. On April 13, 2012, President Obama issued an executive order creating a task force to coordinate federal oversight over domestic natural gas production and hydraulic fracturing. Other governmental agencies, including the U.S. Department of Energy, have evaluated or are evaluating various aspects of hydraulic fracturing. These reviews and studies, depending on their results, could spur initiatives to further regulate hydraulic fracturing under the SDWA or other regulatory programs. Finally, the U.S. Department of Interior is developing proposed rules that would require oil and natural gas producers to publicly disclose their hydraulic fracturing chemicals in connection with drilling wells on federal and Indian lands and would also strengthen standards for well-bore integrity and the management of fluids that return to the surface during and after fracturing operations on federal and Indian lands.
The adoption of new laws or regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or otherwise limiting or regulating, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete oil and natural gas wells in shale formations, increase our and our customers’ costs of compliance, and adversely affect the hydraulic fracturing services that we render for our exploration and production customers. In addition, if hydraulic fracturing becomes regulated at the federal level as a result of federal legislation or regulatory initiatives by the EPA, fracturing activities could become subject to additional permitting or regulatory requirements, and also to attendant permitting delays and potential increases in cost, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations are driven primarily by four interrelated variables: (1) the drilling and stimulation activities of our customers, which directly affects the demand for our services; (2) the prices we are able to charge for our services; (3) the cost of products, materials and labor, and our ability to pass those costs on to our customers; and (4) our service performance. We seek to pass the cost of raw materials, such as proppants and chemicals, on to our customers, and historically, our profitability has not been materially impacted by changes in the costs of these materials. To a large extent, the operating and pricing environments for our services will dictate our level of profitability. To mitigate the volatility in utilization and pricing for the services we offer, we have sought, and will continue to seek, term contracts and other committed contractual arrangements, particularly with respect to our hydraulic fracturing operations.
-20-
We encountered challenging conditions across the U.S. hydraulic fracturing market during the first three months of 2013, and particularly in the latter half of the quarter. Our revenues and results of operations were lower due to lower utilization of our hydraulic fracturing services with respect to both contracted and spot market work and significant pricing pressure, which resulted primarily from the current excess hydraulic fracturing capacity in the market. When compared to the first quarter of 2012, our revenues and results of operations were positively impacted by the addition of our wireline business in June 2012.
Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
The following table summarizes the change in our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | $ Change | |
Revenue | | $ | 276,051 | | | $ | 239,052 | | | $ | 36,999 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct Costs | | | 181,841 | | | | 137,992 | | | | 43,849 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 37,146 | | | | 16,856 | | | | 20,290 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 16,556 | | | | 7,845 | | | | 8,711 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | 90 | | | | 397 | | | | (307 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 40,418 | | | | 75,962 | | | | (35,544 | ) |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | | (1,660 | ) | | | (380 | ) | | | (1,280 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | | | 66 | | | | (72 | ) | | | 138 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other expenses, net | | | (1,594 | ) | | | (452 | ) | | | (1,142 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 38,824 | | | | 75,510 | | | | (36,686 | ) |
Provision for income taxes | | | 13,680 | | | | 26,131 | | | | (12,451 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 25,144 | | | $ | 49,379 | | | $ | (24,235 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue
Revenue increased $37.0 million, or 15%, to $276.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to $239.1 million for the same period in 2012. This increase was primarily related to $62.1 million in Wireline Services revenue as a result of the acquisition of Casedhole Solutions in June 2012, as well as the investments we made in additional hydraulic fracturing and coiled tubing equipment. However, our revenue for the first quarter of 2013 was negatively impacted by a decrease of $13.9 million in the Stimulations and Well Intervention Services segment due to lower hydraulic fracturing utilization with respect to both contracted and spot market work and spot market pricing, as well as a decrease of $11.3 million in the Equipment Manufacturing segment due to lower demand as a result of the current excess equipment capacity in the industry.
Direct Costs
Direct costs increased $43.8 million, or 32%, to $181.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $138.0 million for the same period in 2012 primarily due to the quarter-over-quarter increase in revenue. As a percentage of revenue, direct costs increased from 57.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to 65.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Direct costs as a percentage of revenue increased due to a decline in utilization and pricing in our hydraulic fracturing service line as a result of the current excess equipment capacity coupled with a slight U.S. onshore rig count decline.
-21-
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)
SG&A increased $20.3 million, or 120%, to $37.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to $16.9 million for the same period in 2012. The increase primarily related to $9.9 million in increased costs related to Casedhole Solutions, which we acquired in June 2012, $4.8 million in higher payroll and personnel costs associated with the continued hiring of personnel to support our recent growth, $1.9 million in higher long-term and short-term incentive costs and $0.8 million in higher professional fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $8.7 million, or 111%, to $16.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to $7.8 million for the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily related to $5.8 million from the Wireline Services segment due to the acquisition of Casedhole Solutions in June 2012 and $3.5 million from the Stimulation and Well Intervention Services segment due to the addition and deployment of new hydraulic fracturing and coiled tubing equipment, partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease from the Equipment Manufacturing segment due to the full amortization of certain intangible assets in April 2012.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased by $1.3 million, or 337%, to $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to $0.4 million for the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to higher average outstanding debt balances period over period. This debt was incurred to fund the June 2012 acquisition of Casedhole Solutions.
Income Taxes
We recorded a tax provision of $13.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, at an effective rate of 35.2%, compared to a tax provision of $26.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, at an effective rate of 34.6%. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to lower pre-tax book income versus the same quarter a year ago. The lower pre-tax book income caused state income taxes and the permanent differences between book and taxable income to have a higher proportionate impact on the calculation of the effective tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since the beginning of 2011, our primary sources of liquidity have been cash flows from operations, borrowings under our credit facilities and the net proceeds that we received from our IPO, which closed on August 3, 2011. Our primary uses of capital during this period were for the expansion of our operations, including the purchase and maintenance of equipment and the acquisitions of Casedhole Solutions and Total. Our capital expenditures and our maintenance costs have increased substantially over the last few years to support our growth, and we expect this trend to continue on a long-term basis as we continue to focus on expanding geographically, both domestically and internationally, while actively evaluating complementary service lines in an effort to further diversify our product offerings. We believe that we are well-positioned to capitalize on available opportunities and finance future growth, although sustained significant pressure on pricing and decreased utilization for our hydraulic fracturing services is expected to lead to reduced domestic capital expenditures in the near term.
Our Credit Facility (as described in more detail under “Description of Our Indebtedness” and defined in Note 2 – Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations) provides for up to $400.0 million of revolving credit, which was increased from $200.0 million in June 2012. As of March 31, 2013, we had $150.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility, and as of May 3, 2013, we had $145.0 million outstanding along with $0.7 million in letters of credit, leaving $254.3 million available for additional
-22-
borrowings at that date. Our Credit Facility contains covenants that require us to maintain an interest coverage ratio, to maintain a leverage ratio and to satisfy certain other conditions, as well as certain limitations on our ability to make capital expenditures on a fiscal year basis. These covenants are subject to a number of exceptions and qualifications. As of March 31, 2013, we were in compliance with these covenants. For more information concerning the Credit Facility, please read “Description of Our Indebtedness” and “Note 2 – Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations – Credit Facility” in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We continually monitor potential capital sources, including equity and debt financings, in order to meet our planned capital expenditures and liquidity requirements. Our ability to fund operating cash flow shortfalls, if any, and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend upon our future operating performance, and more broadly, on the availability of equity and debt financing, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in our industry and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. Based on our existing operating performance, we believe our cash flows from operations and existing capital, coupled with borrowings available under our Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet operational and capital expenditure needs over the next twelve months.
Capital Requirements
The energy services business is capital-intensive, requiring significant investment to expand, upgrade and maintain equipment. Capital expenditures totaled $37.0 million in the first quarter of 2013, $33.9 million of which was for growth capital expenditures. Our remaining 2013 capital expenditures are expected to range from $50 to $60 million for our domestic business based on current equipment orders and current growth estimates. We expect that the majority our 2013 capital expenditures will be spent on new equipment for our Stimulation and Well Intervention Services and Wireline Services segments, as well as on maintenance capital.
To date, our capital requirements have consisted primarily of, and we anticipate will continue to be:
| • | | growth capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures made to acquire additional equipment and other assets, expand geographically or advance other strategic initiatives for the purpose of growing our business; and |
| • | | maintenance capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures made to extend the useful life of partially or fully depreciated assets. |
We continually monitor new advances in hydraulic fracturing equipment and down-hole technology, as well as new technologies and products that may complement and enhance our existing businesses, and we commit capital funds to upgrade and purchase additional equipment to meet our customers’ needs. We currently have on order four new coiled tubing units along with related ancillary equipment, which are expected to be delivered mid-2013, with a combined aggregate cost of approximately $15 million, of which approximately $12.3 million was funded as of May 3, 2013. We intend to fund the remaining costs for this equipment through a combination of cash on hand and operating cash flow.
We are actively evaluating opportunities to further enhance and grow our business, including through selective acquisitions and targeted expansion, domestically and internationally. We will continue to make capital investment decisions that we believe will support our long-term growth strategy. The successful execution of our growth strategy depends on our ability to raise capital as needed. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows or to obtain additional capital on favorable terms or at all, we may be unable to sustain or increase our current level of growth in the future. However, we believe we are well positioned to finance our future growth. On June 5, 2012, we increased the borrowing base under our Credit Facility to $400.0 million from $200.0 million and as of May 3, 2013, $254.3 million was
-23-
available for borrowing. We believe our cash on hand, operating cash flow in excess of our working capital requirements and, if needed, borrowings under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund our 2013 capital expenditures and sustain our spending levels over the next 12 months. We plan to continue to monitor the economic environment and demand for our services and adjust our business strategy as necessary.
Financial Condition and Cash Flows
The net cash provided by or used in our operating, investing and financing activities is summarized below (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 62,320 | | | $ | 69,486 | |
Investing activities | | | (36,677 | ) | | | (38,642 | ) |
Financing activities | | | (17,978 | ) | | | 576 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Change in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 7,665 | | | $ | 31,420 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. This decrease was primarily due to lower net income, offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization and working capital fluctuations.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. This decrease was due primarily to the decrease in capital equipment expenditures.
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $18.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $0.1 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to the repayment of outstanding debt in the first quarter of 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, as of March 31, 2013.
Description of Our Indebtedness
Credit Facility. On April 19, 2011, we entered into a five-year $200.0 million senior secured revolving credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and line of credit issuer, Comerica Bank, as line of credit issuer and syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, and various other lenders. Obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”); non-guarantor subsidiaries are immaterial. Effective June 5, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of Casedhole Solutions, we entered into Amendment No. 1 and Joinder to Credit Agreement (the “Amendment”), among other reasons, to facilitate and permit us to fund a portion of the purchase price of the Casedhole Solutions acquisition.
-24-
The Amendment increased our borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility to $400.0 million. To effectuate this increase, new financial institutions were added to the Credit Facility as lenders and certain existing lenders severally agreed to increase their respective commitments. Pursuant to the Amendment, the aggregate amount by which we may periodically increase commitments through incremental facilities was increased from $75.0 million to $100.0 million, the sublimit for letters of credit was left unchanged at $200.0 million and the sublimit for swing line loans was increased from $15.0 million to $25.0 million. On June 7, 2012, we drew $220.0 million from the Credit Facility to fund a portion of the purchase price of the Casedhole Solutions acquisition. As of March 31, 2013, we had $150.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility, and as of May 3, 2013, we had $145.0 million outstanding along with $0.7 million in letters of credit, leaving $254.3 million available for borrowing.
Loans under our Credit Facility are denominated in U.S. dollars and will mature on April 19, 2016. Outstanding loans bear interest at either LIBOR or a base rate, at our election, plus an applicable margin which ranges from 1.25% to 2.00% for base rate loans and from 2.25% to 3.00% for LIBOR loans, based upon our Consolidated Leverage Ratio. The Consolidated Leverage Ratio is the ratio of funded indebtedness to EBITDA for us and our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. All obligations under our Credit Facility are secured, subject to agreed-upon exceptions, by a first priority perfected security position on all real and personal property of us and the Guarantor Subsidiaries.
The Credit Facility contains customary affirmative covenants including financial reporting, governance and notification requirements. The Amendment made certain changes to the Credit Facility’s affirmative covenants, including the financial reporting and notification requirements, and the Credit Facility’s negative covenants, including the restriction on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to conduct asset sales, incur additional indebtedness, issue dividends, grant liens, issue guarantees, make investments, loans or advances and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. Additionally, the Amendment altered the restriction on capital expenditures to allow us to make an unlimited amount of capital expenditures so long as (i) the pro forma Consolidated Leverage Ratio is less than 2.00 to 1.00, (ii) we have pro forma liquidity of greater than $40.0 million, (iii) no default exists and (iv) the capital expenditures could not reasonably be expected to cause a default. Further, in the event that these conditions are not met, we will be permitted to make capital expenditures of up to $200.0 million in any fiscal year, provided that up to $50.0 million of such amount in any fiscal year may be rolled over to the subsequent fiscal year and up to $50.0 million may be pulled forward from the subsequent fiscal year. These capital expenditure restrictions will not apply to capital expenditures financed solely with the proceeds from the issuance of qualified equity interests and asset sales or normal replacement and maintenance capital expenditures.
The Credit Facility requires us to maintain, measured on a consolidated basis, (1) an Interest Coverage Ratio of not less than 3.00 to 1.00 and (2) a Consolidated Leverage Ratio of not greater than 3.25 to 1.00. As of March 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
Capitalized terms used in “Description of Our Indebtedness” but not defined herein are defined in the Credit Facility.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” or “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
-25-
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2013.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No changes in our system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
-26-
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims incidental to or arising in the ordinary course of our business. Our management does not expect the outcome in any of these known legal proceedings, individually or collectively, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, including under the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” you should carefully consider the information set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, for a detailed discussion of known material factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALESOF EQUITY SECURITIESAND USEOF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes stock repurchase activity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands, except average price paid per share):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) | | | Average Price Paid Per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | | | Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under Such Program | |
January 1—January 31 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
February 1—February 28 | | | 2,415 | | | | 23.69 | | | | — | | | | — | |
March 1—March 31 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
(a) | Represents shares that were withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding obligations of an employee that arose upon the vesting of restricted stock. The value of such shares is based on the NYSE closing price on the vesting date. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
-27-
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits required to be filed or furnished by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed below.
| | |
| |
3.1 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of C&J Energy Services, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the C&J Energy Services, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated March 30, 2011 (Registration No. 333-173177)). |
| |
3.2 | | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of C&J Energy Services, Inc., effective February 27, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the C&J Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 29, 2012 (File No. 001-35255)). |
| |
*10.1 | | Executive Employment Agreement dated April 4, 2013 and effective as of April 1, 2013 by and between C&J Energy Services, Inc. and James H. Prestidge, Jr. |
| |
*31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
*31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
**32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
**32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
*** 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| |
*** 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| |
*** 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| |
*** 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| |
*** 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| |
*** 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
** | Furnished herewith in accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K. |
*** | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
-28-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
| | C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. |
| | | |
Date: May 8, 2013 | | | | By: | | /s/ Randall C. McMullen, Jr. |
| | | | | | Randall C. McMullen, Jr. President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | | | | | (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
-29-
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | |
| |
3.1 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of C&J Energy Services, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the C&J Energy Services, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated March 30, 2011 (Registration No. 333-173177)). |
| |
3.2 | | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of C&J Energy Services, Inc., effective February 27, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the C&J Energy Services, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 29, 2012 (File No. 001-35255)). |
| |
*10.1 | | Executive Employment Agreement dated April 4, 2013 and effective as of April 1, 2013 by and between C&J Energy Services, Inc. and James H. Prestidge, Jr. |
| |
*31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
*31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
**32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
**32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
*** 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| |
*** 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| |
*** 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| |
*** 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| |
*** 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| |
*** 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
** | Furnished herewith in accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K. |
*** | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
-30-