Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block] | 1. Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation Insys Therapeutics, Inc., which was incorporated in Delaware in June 1990, and our subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “us,” and “our”) maintain headquarters in Chandler, Arizona. We are a commercial-stage specialty pharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes innovative supportive care products. We have one marketed product: Subsys, a proprietary sublingual fentanyl spray for BTCP in opioid-tolerant adult patients. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, pursuant to rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year or any other periods. The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make a number of estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition (which is affected by prescriptions dispensed, wholesaler discounts, patient discount programs, rebates and chargebacks), inventories, stock-based compensation expense, and deferred tax valuation allowances. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed by management to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates. On May 5, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of our common stock that was effected through a stock dividend. The record date for the stock split was the close of business on May 26, 2015, with share distribution occurring on June 8, 2015. As a result of the dividend, shareholders received one additional share of Insys Therapeutics, Inc. common stock, par value $0.01, for each one share they held as of the record date. All share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated for the effects of this stock split. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with current period presentation. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Restatement of Financial Statements We are filing this Amendment No. 1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Amended Form 10-Q”) to restate and amend our previously issued, unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information as of March 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, which was originally filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016 (the “Original Form 10-Q”). The restatement is the result of a misapplication of the accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 605, “Revenue Recognition” related to accounting for rebate obligations on government payer and managed care contracts. We also reversed an out-of-period adjustment related to a stock option modification previously recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2016 that related to the fourth quarter of 2015. This resulted in a decrease in operating expenses of $1,500,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and a corresponding increase in operating expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2015. We assessed the impact of these errors on our prior unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and concluded that the impact was material to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. In order to correctly present net revenue and operating expenses in the appropriate periods during 2016 and 2015, we have restated the unaudited condensed consolidated financial information included herein. We also reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform with current period presentation. Effects of Restatement on Previously Filed March 31, 2016 Form 10-Q The effect of the restatement on the previously filed unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows, in thousands: March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015 As Reported Reclassification Restatement As Restated As Reported Reclassification Restatement As Restated Accounts receivable, net $ 20,963 $ (300 ) $ — $ 20,663 $ 34,176 $ (2,559 ) $ — $ 31,617 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 3,918 (1,156 ) 1,315 4,077 2,734 2,559 689 5,982 Deferred income tax assets, net — — — — 8,479 (8,479 ) — — Total current assets 220,750 (1,456 ) 1,315 220,609 182,085 (8,479 ) 689 174,295 Deferred income tax assets, net 17,046 — 1,146 18,192 4,874 8,479 282 13,635 Total assets 325,022 (1,456 ) 2,461 326,027 247,214 — 971 248,185 Accounts payable and accrued expenses 25,746 (1,156 ) — 24,590 36,578 (8,144 ) — 28,434 Accrued sales allowances 24,994 (300 ) 5,048 29,742 15,215 — 6,111 21,326 Accrued litigation award and settlements 9,567 — — 9,567 — 8,144 — 8,144 Total current liabilities 67,546 (1,456 ) 5,048 71,138 58,802 — 6,111 64,913 Uncertain income tax position 7,481 — (91 ) 7,390 3,778 — (42 ) 3,736 Total liabilities 75,027 (1,456 ) 4,957 78,528 62,580 — 6,069 68,649 Additional paid in capital 239,433 — (6 ) 239,427 227,327 (356 ) (1,019 ) 225,952 Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) 9,854 — (2,490 ) 7,364 (43,033 ) — (4,079 ) (47,112 ) Total stockholders’ equity 249,995 — (2,496 ) 247,499 184,634 — (5,098 ) 179,536 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 325,022 $ (1,456 ) $ 2,461 $ 326,027 $ 247,214 $ — $ 971 $ 248,185 The effect of the restatement on the previously filed unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows, in thousands (except share and per share data): Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 As Reported Reclassification Restatement As Restated As Reported Reclassification Restatement As Restated Net revenue $ 61,962 $ — $ (1,541 ) $ 60,421 $ 70,770 $ — $ (3,078 ) $ 67,692 Gross profit 57,324 — (1,541 ) 55,783 64,395 — (3,078 ) 61,317 Research and development expenses 20,535 — (1,500 ) 19,035 10,602 — — 10,602 Total operating expenses 55,033 — (1,500 ) 53,533 52,764 — — 52,764 Operating income 2,291 — (41 ) 2,250 11,631 — (3,078 ) 8,553 Income before income taxes 2,565 — (41 ) 2,524 11,756 — (3,078 ) 8,678 Less: income tax expense 131 — 103 234 3,733 — (922 ) 2,811 Net income 2,434 — (144 ) 2,290 8,023 — (2,156 ) 5,867 Total comprehensive income $ 2,600 — $ (144 ) $ 2,456 $ 8,051 — $ (2,156 ) $ 5,895 Net income per common share: Basic $ 0.03 $ — $ — $ 0.03 $ 0.11 $ — $ (0.03 ) $ 0.08 Diluted $ 0.03 $ — $ — $ 0.03 $ 0.11 $ — $ (0.03 ) $ 0.08 The effect of the restatement on the previously filed unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows, in thousands: Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 As Reported Reclassification Restatement As Restated As Reported Reclassification Restatement As Restated Net income $ 2,434 $ — $ (144 ) $ 2,290 $ 8,023 $ — $ (2,156 ) $ 5,867 Stock-based compensation 5,626 — (1,500 ) 4,126 3,720 — — 3,720 Deferred income tax benefit, net (715 ) — 130 (585 ) (1,140 ) — 198 (942 ) Excess tax benefits on stock options and awards (108 ) — (545 ) (653 ) (4,069 ) 3 465 (3,601 ) Amortization of investment (premium) discount — 569 — 569 — 194 — 194 Change in accounts receivable 27,496 (887 ) — 26,609 (7,632 ) (483 ) — (8,115 ) Change in inventories 9,474 (11,139 ) — (1,665 ) (455 ) (624 ) — (1,079 ) Change in prepaid expenses and other current assets (11,083 ) 12,294 (1,315 ) (104 ) (666 ) 1,107 (655 ) (214 ) Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities (22,361 ) (267 ) 2,829 (19,799 ) 17,197 (8,004 ) 2,613 11,806 Change in accrued litigation award and settlements — — — — — 8,000 — 8,000 Net cash provided by operating activities 12,290 570 (545 ) 12,315 16,194 193 465 16,852 Purchase of investments (3,289 ) (19,285 ) — (22,574 ) (6,602 ) (3,867 ) — (10,469 ) Proceeds from sales of investments — 2,108 — 2,108 371 (371 ) — — Proceeds from maturity of investments — 16,607 — 16,607 — 4,045 — 4,045 Purchases of property and equipment (2,763 ) — — (2,763 ) (5,191 ) — — (5,191 ) Net cash used in investing activities (6,052 ) (570 ) — (6,622 ) (11,422 ) (193 ) — (11,615 ) Excess tax benefits on stock options and awards 108 — 545 653 4,069 (3 ) (465 ) 3,601 Proceeds from exercise of stock options 1,310 — — 1,310 3,127 3 — 3,130 Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities $ (11,933 ) $ — $ 545 $ (11,388 ) $ 7,196 $ — $ (465 ) $ 6,731 Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, to reduce complexity in accounting standards involving several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including (1) the income tax consequences, (2) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and (3) classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. Amendments related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition, amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement should be applied retrospectively, amendments requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement and the practical expedient for estimating expected term should be applied prospectively, and amendments related to the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows can be applied using either a prospective transition method or a retrospective transition method. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. We are currently evaluating the impact of these amendments on its financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and address how an entity should assess whether it is the principal or the agent in contracts that include three or more parties. The effective date and transition requirements for these amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU 2014-09 (discussed below). We are currently evaluating the impact of these amendments on its financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases: (Topic 842), to provide guidance on recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements, specifically differentiating between different types of leases. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from all leases. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous GAAP. There continues to be a differentiation between finance leases and operating leases. However, the principal difference from previous guidance is that the lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases should be recognized in the balance sheet. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under previous GAAP. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. These practical expedients relate to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, initial direct costs for leases that commenced before the effective date, and the ability to use hindsight in evaluating lessee options to extend or terminate a lease or to purchase the underlying asset. An entity that elects to apply the practical expedients will, in effect, continue to account for leases that commence before the effective date in accordance with previous GAAP unless the lease is modified, except that lessees are required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all operating leases at each reporting date based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments that were tracked and disclosed under previous GAAP. We are currently evaluating the impact of these amendments on its financial statements. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which amended the Financial Instruments topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is not permitted. These amendments should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values (including disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption. We are is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments on its financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. As amended by the FASB in July 2015, the standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined the method by which we will adopt the standard in 2018. In July 2015, the FASB issued guidance that requires entities to measure most inventory at the lower of cost and NRV, thereby simplifying the current guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Under the new guidance, inventory is measured at the lower of cost and NRV, which eliminates the need to determine replacement cost and evaluate whether it is above the ceiling (NRV) or below the floor (NRV less a normal profit margin). The guidance defines NRV as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. Early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidance on our financial position and results of operations. |