Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block] | Derivatives and Other Securities In connection with our risk management strategy, we hedge a portion of our exposure to market risks, including interest rate risk, prepayment risk and credit risk, by entering into derivative and other hedging instrument contracts. We may enter into agreements for interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions, interest rate cap or floor contracts and futures or forward contracts. We may also purchase or short TBA and U.S. Treasury securities, purchase or write put or call options on TBA securities or we may invest in other types of derivative securities, including synthetic total return swaps and credit default swaps. Our risk management strategy attempts to manage the overall risk of the portfolio and reduce fluctuations in book value. We do not use derivative or other hedging instruments for speculative purposes. Derivatives have not been designated as hedging instruments. We do not offset our derivatives and related cash collateral with the same counterparties under any master netting arrangements. For additional information regarding our derivative instruments and our overall risk management strategy, please refer to the discussion of derivatives in Note 3. The table below presents the balance sheet location and fair value information for our derivatives outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands): June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Interest rate swaps $ 4,806 $ 9,414 Interest rate swaptions 4,610 5,464 TBA securities 2,519 13,495 Interest only swaps — 201 U.S. Treasury futures 680 — Mortgage options 915 — Derivative assets, at fair value $ 13,530 $ 28,574 Interest rate swaps $ 59,941 $ 73,052 TBA securities 6,930 1,863 Credit default swaps 3,159 — Interest only swaps 98 — U.S. Treasury futures — 1,066 Derivative liabilities, at fair value $ 70,128 $ 75,981 The following table summarizes the effect of our outstanding derivatives and other securities on our consolidated statements of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 2014 Realized Loss on Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps, net Realized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Realized Loss on Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps, net Realized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Interest rate swaps $ (4,433 ) $ (21,749 ) $ 50,282 $ (5,227 ) $ — $ (50,038 ) Interest rate swaptions — — 943 — (2,164 ) (1,885 ) TBA securities — (2,936 ) (9,290 ) — 14,821 12,747 U.S. Treasuries — (6,807 ) (3,393 ) — 1,711 1,480 U.S. Treasury futures — (563 ) 3,679 — (3,203 ) (523 ) Short sales of U.S. Treasuries — 97 613 — (4,417 ) (8,887 ) REIT equity investments — — — — 4,812 (1,965 ) Mortgage options — 22 (353 ) — — (140 ) Interest only swap — (930 ) (739 ) — — — Credit default swap — 325 (74 ) — — — Credit default option — — 340 — — — Total $ (4,433 ) $ (32,541 ) $ 42,008 $ (5,227 ) $ 11,560 $ (49,211 ) For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 2014 Realized Loss on Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps, net Realized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Realized Loss on Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps, net Realized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Other Derivatives and Securities, net Interest rate swaps $ (8,744 ) $ (29,574 ) $ 7,176 $ (10,174 ) $ 68 $ (78,202 ) Interest rate swaptions — (520 ) (334 ) — (16,832 ) (8,368 ) TBA securities — 13,500 (16,473 ) — 5,992 11,918 U.S. Treasuries — 9,094 (738 ) — 2,758 12,438 U.S. Treasury futures — (2,778 ) 1,746 — (3,977 ) (2,761 ) Short sales of U.S. Treasuries — (5,084 ) 934 — (5,964 ) (5,067 ) REIT equity investments — — — — 7,487 1,877 Mortgage options — 22 — — — (140 ) Interest only swap — (284 ) (311 ) — — — Credit default swap — 325 (74 ) — — — Credit default option — — 340 — — — Total $ (8,744 ) $ (15,299 ) $ (7,734 ) $ (10,174 ) $ (10,468 ) $ (68,305 ) The following tables summarize changes in notional amounts for our outstanding derivatives and other securities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): December 31, 2014 Notional Amount Additions/ Long Positions Expirations/ Terminations/ Short Positions June 30, 2015 Notional Amount Interest rate swaps $ 4,015,000 — (1,225,000 ) $ 2,790,000 Interest rate swaptions $ 550,000 — (100,000 ) $ 450,000 TBA securities $ 296,172 19,145,070 (19,498,669 ) $ (57,427 ) U.S. Treasuries $ 756,500 2,430,250 (2,906,750 ) $ 280,000 U.S. Treasury futures $ (150,000 ) 300,000 (300,000 ) $ (150,000 ) Short sales of U.S. Treasuries $ (228,500 ) 679,500 (476,000 ) $ (25,000 ) Mortgage options $ — 50,000 (50,000 ) $ — Interest only swaps $ 48,739 — (4,975 ) $ 43,764 Credit default swaps — 50,000 (500 ) $ 49,500 Credit default options $ — 50,000 (500 ) $ 49,500 December 31, 2013 Notional Amount Additions/ Long Positions Expirations/ Terminations/ Short Positions June 30, 2014 Notional Amount Interest rate swaps $ 3,240,000 875,000 (50,000 ) $ 4,065,000 Interest rate swaptions $ 2,100,000 75,000 (1,775,000 ) $ 400,000 TBA securities $ (773,816 ) 9,667,634 (7,769,168 ) $ 1,124,650 U.S. Treasuries $ 656,000 280,570 (786,570 ) $ 150,000 U.S. Treasury futures $ (150,000 ) 300,000 (300,000 ) $ (150,000 ) Short sales of U.S. Treasuries $ (23,000 ) 813,000 (1,360,000 ) $ (570,000 ) Mortgage options $ — — (100,000 ) $ (100,000 ) Interest Rate Swap Agreements As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , our derivative portfolio included interest rate swaps, which have the effect of modifying the repricing characteristics of our repurchase agreements and cash flows on such liabilities. Our interest rate swaps are used to manage the interest rate risk created by our use of short-term repurchase agreements. Under our interest rate swaps, we typically pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate based on LIBOR with terms usually ranging up to 15 years. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , we had interest rate swap agreements summarized in the tables below (dollars in thousands). June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Interest Rate Swaps Balance Sheet Location Notional Amount Fair Value Notional Amount Fair Value Interest rate swap assets Derivative assets, at fair value $ 525,000 $ 4,806 $ 925,000 $ 9,414 Interest rate swap liabilities Derivative liabilities, at fair value 2,265,000 (59,941 ) 3,090,000 (73,052 ) $ 2,790,000 $ (55,135 ) $ 4,015,000 $ (63,638 ) June 30, 2015 Notional Fair Value Weighted Average Current Maturity Date for Interest Rate Swaps (1) Fixed (2) Receive Rate (3) Maturity (Years) ≤ 3 years $ 865,000 $ (2,669 ) 1.01 % 0.28 % 1.5 > 3 to ≤ 5 years 750,000 (8,785 ) 1.78 % 0.28 % 3.8 > 5 to ≤ 7 years 875,000 (30,000 ) 2.94 % 0.28 % 6.0 > 7 years 300,000 (13,681 ) 2.93 % 0.27 % 8.2 Total $ 2,790,000 $ (55,135 ) 2.03 % 0.28 % 4.3 December 31, 2014 Notional Fair Value Weighted Average Current Maturity Date for Interest Rate Swaps (4) Fixed (2) Receive (3) Maturity ≤ 3 years $ 1,065,000 $ (1,635 ) 0.97 % 0.23 % 1.6 > 3 to ≤ 5 years 850,000 (4,441 ) 1.91 % 0.23 % 4.2 > 5 to ≤ 7 years 1,625,000 (38,780 ) 2.66 % 0.23 % 6.0 > 7 years 475,000 (18,782 ) 2.87 % 0.25 % 8.2 Total $ 4,015,000 $ (63,638 ) 2.08 % 0.23 % 4.7 ———————— (1) Includes swaps with an aggregate notional of $1.2 billion with deferred start dates averaging 0.8 years from June 30, 2015 . (2) Excluding forward starting swaps, the weighted average pay rate was 1.30% and 1.24% as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively. (3) Weighted average receive rate excludes impact of forward starting interest rate swaps. (4) Includes swaps with an aggregate notional of $2.1 billion with deferred start dates averaging 1.1 years from December 31, 2014 . As of June 30, 2015 , interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $1.4 billion and liability fair value of $(54.3) million were centrally cleared on a registered exchange. Interest Rate Swaption Agreements Our interest rate swaption agreements provide us the option to enter into interest rate swap agreements in the future where we would pay a fixed rate and receive LIBOR. The following tables present certain information about our interest rate swaption agreements as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands): June 30, 2015 Option Underlying Swap Current Option Expiration Date Cost Fair Value Weighted Average Years to Expiration Notional Amount Pay Rate Weighted Average Term (Years) ≤ 3 months $ 4,765 $ 2,048 0.2 $ 100,000 3.34 % 6.8 > 3 to ≤ 12 months 3,174 862 0.6 250,000 3.55 % 8.8 > 24 months 2,735 1,700 2.4 100,000 3.21 % 5.0 Total / weighted average $ 10,674 $ 4,610 0.9 $ 450,000 3.43 % 7.5 December 31, 2014 Option Underlying Swap Current Option Expiration Date Cost Fair Value Weighted Average Years to Expiration Notional Amount Pay Rate Weighted Average Term (Years) ≤ 3 months $ 4,013 $ 1,972 0.1 $ 150,000 2.78 % 4.3 > 3 to ≤ 12 months 3,139 1,432 0.9 200,000 3.29 % 8.8 >12 to ≤ 24 months 1,308 207 1.3 100,000 4.13 % 7.0 > 24 months 2,735 1,853 2.9 100,000 3.21 % 5.0 Total / weighted average $ 11,195 $ 5,464 1.1 $ 550,000 3.29 % 6.5 TBA Securities As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , we had contracts to purchase ("long position") and sell ("short position") TBA securities on a forward basis, presented in the following table (in thousands): June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Purchase and Sale Contracts for TBA Securities Notional Amount (1) Fair Value (2) Notional Amount (1) Fair Value (2) TBA assets Purchase of TBA securities $ 171,720 $ 151 $ 829,030 $ 8,226 Sale of TBA securities (561,012 ) 2,368 (74,758 ) 5,269 Total TBA assets (389,292 ) 2,519 754,272 13,495 TBA liabilities Purchase of TBA securities 474,700 (5,675 ) 199,000 (595 ) Sale of TBA securities (142,835 ) (1,255 ) (657,100 ) (1,268 ) Total TBA liabilities 331,865 (6,930 ) (458,100 ) (1,863 ) Total net TBA $ (57,427 ) $ (4,411 ) $ 296,172 $ 11,632 ———————— (1) Notional amount represents the par value or principal balance of the underlying agency security. (2) Fair value represents the current market value of the agency RMBS underlying the TBA contract as of period end, less the forward price to be paid for the underlying agency RMBS. U.S. Treasury Securities and Futures We purchase or sell short U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts to help mitigate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on the performance of our portfolio. We had U.S. Treasury securities with a fair value of $279.1 million and $758.6 million and a face amount of $280.0 million and $756.5 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively, which are presented as U.S. Treasury securities, at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we had short positions in U.S. Treasury futures with a notional amount of $(150.0) million as of both June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 . These short U.S. Treasury futures had fair values of $0.7 million and $(1.1) million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively, and are presented in derivative assets (liabilities), at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features The use of derivatives creates exposure to credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized in the event that the counterparties to these instruments fail to perform their obligations under the contracts. We minimize this risk by limiting our counterparties for instruments which are not centrally cleared on a registered exchange to major financial institutions with acceptable credit ratings and monitoring positions with individual counterparties. In addition, both we and our counterparties may be required to pledge assets as collateral for our derivatives, whose amounts vary over time based on the market value, notional amount and remaining term of the derivative contract. In the event of a default by a counterparty, we may not receive payments provided for under the terms of our derivative agreements, and may have difficulty obtaining our assets pledged as collateral for our derivatives. The cash and cash equivalents pledged as collateral for our derivative instruments is included in restricted cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheets. Each of our ISDA Master Agreements contains provisions pursuant to which we are required to fully collateralize our obligations under our interest rate swap agreements if at any point the fair value of the swap represents a liability greater than the minimum transfer amount contained within our ISDA Master Agreements. We are also required to post initial collateral upon execution of certain of our swap transactions. If we breach any of these provisions, we will be required to settle our obligations under the agreements at their termination values, which approximates fair value. Further, each of our ISDA Master Agreements also contains a cross default provision under which a default under certain of our other indebtedness in excess of a certain threshold causes an event of default under the agreement. Threshold amounts vary by lender. Following an event of default, we could be required to settle our obligations under the agreements at their termination values. Additionally, under certain of our ISDA Master Agreements, we could be required to settle our obligations under the agreements at their termination values if we fail to maintain either our REIT status or certain minimum stockholders’ equity thresholds, or comply with limits on our leverage above certain specified levels. As of June 30, 2015 , the fair value of the additional collateral that could be required to be posted as a result of the credit-risk related contingent features being triggered was not material to our consolidated financial statements. Concerning our non-centrally cleared interest rate swap and swaption agreements, we did not have counterparty credit risk with any single counterparty in excess of 1% of our stockholders’ equity, as of June 30, 2015 . In the case of centrally cleared interest rate swap contracts, we could be exposed to credit risk if the central clearing agency or a clearing member defaults on its respective obligation to perform under the contract; however, the risk is considered minimal due to initial and daily exchange of mark to market margin requirements and the clearinghouse guarantee fund and other resources that are available in the event of a clearing member default. |