Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Oct. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Change of Year End | Change of Year End |
|
Effective January 13, 2014, MamaMancini’s Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) changed its fiscal year-end date to January 31. The Company’s 2014 fiscal year commenced on February 1, 2014 and concludes on January 31, 2015. The Company changed its year end to be consistent with a significant number of its retail customers that have a fiscal year end on or near January 31. This allows the Company to more accurately account for accrued discounts and promotions to these retailers. The Company determined that recasting the prior year comparable period ended January 31, 2013 would not be material. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions impact, among others, the following: allowance for bad debt, inventory obsolescence, the fair value of share-based payments. |
|
Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from our estimates. |
Risks and Uncertainties | Risks and Uncertainties |
|
The Company operates in an industry that is subject to intense competition and change in consumer demand. The Company’s operations are subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial and operational risks including the potential risk of business failure. |
|
The Company has experienced, and in the future expects to continue to experience, variability in sales and earnings. The factors expected to contribute to this variability include, among others, (i) the cyclical nature of the grocery industry, (ii) general economic conditions in the various local markets in which the Company competes, including the general downturn in the economy, and (iii) the volatility of prices pertaining to food and beverages in connection with the Company’s distribution of the product. These factors, among others, make it difficult to project the Company’s operating results on a consistent basis. |
Cash | Cash |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company held no cash equivalents at October 31, 2014 or January 31, 2014. |
|
The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. |
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. The Company generally does not require collateral to support customer receivables. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a review of the outstanding accounts receivable, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. The Company determines if receivables are past due based on days outstanding, and amounts are written off when determined to be uncollectible by management. The maximum accounting loss from the credit risk associated with accounts receivable is the amount of the receivable recorded, which is the face amount of the receivable net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. As of October 31, 2014 and January 31, 2014, the Company had reserves of $2,000. |
Inventories | Inventories |
|
Inventories are stated at average cost using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) valuation method. Inventory was comprised of the following at October 31, 2014 and January 31, 2014: |
|
| | 31-Oct-14 | | | 31-Jan-14 | | | | | |
Finished goods | | $ | 213,455 | | | $ | 159,829 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation expense is computed using straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives. |
|
Asset lives for financial statement reporting of depreciation are: |
|
Machinery and equipment | | 2-7 years | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | | 3-5 years | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | | 3-10 years | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
For purpose of this disclosure, the fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation. The carrying amount of the Company’s short term financial instruments approximates fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments. |
Stock Issuance Costs | Stock Issuance Costs |
|
Stock issuance costs are capitalized as incurred. Upon the completion of the offering, the stock issuance costs are reclassified to equity. Offering costs recorded to equity for the nine months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and the one month ended January 31, 2014 were $334,571, $1,123,498 and $102,166, respectively. |
Research and Development | Research and Development |
|
Research and development is expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses for three months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 were $28,967 and $5,212, respectively. Research and development expenses for nine months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and the one month ended January 31, 2014 were $71,959, $12,350 and $8,477, respectively. |
Shipping and Handling Costs | Shipping and Handling Costs |
|
The Company classifies freight billed to customers as sales revenue and the related freight costs as cost of sales. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company records revenue for products when all of the following have occurred: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) the product is delivered, (3) the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability of the related customer receivable is reasonably assured. There is no stated right of return for products. |
|
The Company meets these criteria upon shipment. |
|
Expenses such as slotting fees, sales discounts, and allowances are accounted for as a direct reduction of revenues as follows: |
|
| | Nine Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | | | One Month Ended | |
31-Oct-14 | 30-Sep-13 | 31-Jan-14 |
Gross Sales | | $ | 8,903,100 | | | $ | 6,033,622 | | | $ | 796,177 | |
Less: Slotting, Discounts, Allowances | | | 310,485 | | | | 393,553 | | | | 20,925 | |
Net Sales | | $ | 8,952,615 | | | $ | 5,640,069 | | | $ | 775,252 | |
Cost of Sales | Cost of Sales |
|
Cost of sales represents costs directly related to the production and manufacturing of the Company’s products. Costs include product development, freight, packaging, and print production costs. |
Advertising | Advertising |
|
Costs incurred for producing and communicating advertising for the Company are charged to operations as incurred. Producing and communicating advertising expenses for the three months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 were $693,688 and $456,313, respectively. Producing and communicating advertising expenses for the nine months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and the one month ended January 31, 2014 were $1,959,547, $1,267,035 and $232,481, respectively. |
Stock-based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“ASC 718”) which establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based employee compensation. It defines a fair value based method of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity instrument. The Company accounts for compensation cost for stock option plans in accordance with ASC 718. The Company accounts for share-based payments to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50 “Accounting for Equity Instruments Issued to Non-Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services”. |
|
The Company recognizes all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, warrants and restricted stock grants, at their fair value on the grant date, which are based on the estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. |
|
Share-based payments, excluding restricted stock, are valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Grants of share-based payment awards issued to non-employees for services rendered have been recorded at the fair value of the share-based payment, which is the more readily determinable value. The grants are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods, which is generally the vesting period. If an award is granted, but vesting does not occur, any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed in the period related to the termination of service. Stock-based compensation expenses are included in cost of goods sold or selling, general and administrative expenses, depending on the nature of the services provided, in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Share-based payments issued to placement agents are classified as a direct cost of a stock offering and are recorded as a reduction in additional paid in capital. |
|
For the three months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 share-based compensation, including stock offering costs and restricted stock, amounted to $88,247 and $292,431, respectively. For the nine months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and the one month ended January 31, 2014 share-based compensation amounted to $436,328, $662,506 and $45,681, respectively. Of the $436,328 recorded for the nine months ended October 31, 2014, $171,981 was a direct cost of a stock offering and has been recorded as a reduction in additional paid in capital. |
|
For the nine months ended October 31, 2014, when computing fair value of share-based payments, the Company has considered the following variables: |
|
● | The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the expected term of the option in effect at the time of the grant. The risk free rate used had a range of 0.26%-1.76%. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
● | The Company has not paid any dividends on common stock since its inception and does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future. Therefore the expected dividend rate was 0%. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
● | The expected option term is computed using the “simplified” method as permitted under the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 110. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
● | The warrant term is the life of the warrant. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
● | The expected volatility was benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry. The expected volatility used had a range of 144%-193%. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
● | The forfeiture rate is based on the historical forfeiture rate for the Company’s unvested stock options, which was 0%. | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share | Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss), adjusted for changes in income or loss that resulted from the assumed conversion of convertible shares, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. |
|
The Company had the following potential common stock equivalents at October 31, 2014: |
|
Common stock subscribed | | | 66,667 | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock warrants, exercise price range of $1.00-$2.50 | | | 1,013,401 | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock options, exercise price of $1.00-$2.97 | | | 508,404 | | | | | | | | | |
Total common stock equivalents | | | 1,558,472 | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company had the following potential common stock equivalents at September 30, 2013: |
|
Common stock subscribed | | | - | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock warrants, exercise price of $1.00 | | | 782,534 | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock options, exercise price of $1.00 | | | 420,923 | | | | | | | | | |
Total common stock equivalents | | | 1,203,457 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Since the Company reflected a net loss during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the effect of considering any common stock equivalents, would have been anti-dilutive. A separate computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share is not presented. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes |
|
Income taxes are provided in accordance with ASC No. 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the period of deferred tax assets and liabilities. |
|
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, in May 2014. The amendments in this Update supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments supersede the cost guidance in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition—Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and create new Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2011-230—Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2011–250—Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Codification Amendments, both of which have been deleted. Accounting Standards Update 2014-09. The amendments in this Update are effectively for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014-09 on the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation- Stock Compensation. The amendments in this update apply to reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target can be achieved after the requisite service period. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update EITF-13D—Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which has been deleted. The proposed amendments would apply to reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update EITF-13D—Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which has been deleted. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014-12 on the condensed consolidated financial statements. |