Risk Management and Derivative Instruments | Note 5. Risk Management and Derivative Instruments Derivative instruments are utilized to manage exposure to commodity price and interest rate fluctuations and achieve a more predictable cash flow in connection with natural gas and oil sales from production and borrowing related activities. These instruments limit exposure to declines in prices or increases in interest rates, but also limit the benefits that would be realized if prices increase or interest rates decrease. Certain inherent business risks are associated with commodity and interest derivative contracts, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk that the price of natural gas or oil will change, either favorably or unfavorably, in response to changing market conditions. Credit risk is the risk of loss from nonperformance by the counterparty to a contract. It is our policy to enter into derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, only with creditworthy counterparties, which generally are financial institutions, deemed by management as competent and competitive market makers. Some of the lenders, or certain of their affiliates, under our credit agreement are counterparties to our derivative contracts. While collateral is generally not required to be posted by counterparties, credit risk associated with derivative instruments is minimized by limiting exposure to any single counterparty and entering into derivative instruments only with creditworthy counterparties that are generally large financial institutions. Additionally, master netting agreements are used to mitigate risk of loss due to default with counterparties on derivative instruments. We have also entered into International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements (“ISDA Agreements”) with each of our counterparties. The terms of the ISDA Agreements provide us and each of our counterparties with rights of set-off upon the occurrence of defined acts of default by either us or our counterparty to a derivative, whereby the party not in default may set-off all liabilities owed to the defaulting party against all net derivative asset receivables from the defaulting party. As a result, had all counterparties failed completely to perform according to the terms of the existing contracts, we would have the right to offset $272.7 million against amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility at June 30, 2016, reducing our maximum credit exposure to approximately $197.3 million, of which approximately $64.3 million was with one counterparty. See Note 7 for additional information regarding our revolving credit facility. Commodity Derivatives We may use a combination of commodity derivatives (e.g., floating-for-fixed swaps, put options, costless collars and basis swaps) to manage exposure to commodity price volatility. We recognize all derivative instruments at fair value; however, certain of our put option derivative instruments have a deferred premium, which reduces the asset. For the deferred premium puts, the Partnership agrees to pay a premium to the counterparty at the time of settlement. At settlement, if the applicable index price is below the strike price of the put, the Partnership receives the difference between the strike price and the applicable index price multiplied by the contract volumes less the premium. If the applicable index price settles at or above the strike price of the put, the Partnership pays only the premium at settlement. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, we terminated certain “in-the-money” crude oil and NGL derivatives settling in 2016 and certain crude oil basis swaps settling in 2016 and 2017. We received cash settlements of approximately $39.3 million from the termination of these crude oil and NGL derivatives. In February 2015, we restructured a portion of our commodity derivative portfolio by effectively terminating “in-the-money” crude oil derivatives settling in 2015 through 2017 and entering into NGL derivatives with the same tenor. Cash settlement receipts of approximately $27.1 million from the termination of these crude oil derivatives were applied as premiums for the new NGL derivatives. We enter into natural gas derivative contracts that are indexed to NYMEX-Henry Hub and regional indices such as NGPL TXOK, TETCO STX, CIG and Houston Ship Channel in proximity to our areas of production. We also enter into oil derivative contracts indexed to a variety of locations such as NYMEX-WTI, ICE Brent, California Midway-Sunset and other regional locations. Our NGL derivative contracts are primarily indexed to OPIS Mont Belvieu. At June 30, 2016, we had the following open commodity positions: Remaining 2016 2017 2018 2019 Natural Gas Derivative Contracts: Fixed price swap contracts: Average Monthly Volume (MMBtu) 3,574,108 3,350,067 3,060,000 2,814,583 Weighted-average fixed price $ 4.14 $ 4.06 $ 4.18 $ 4.31 Basis swaps: Average Monthly Volume (MMBtu) 3,561,667 2,210,000 1,315,000 900,000 Spread $ (0.07 ) $ (0.04 ) $ (0.02 ) $ 0.01 Crude Oil Derivative Contracts: Fixed price swap contracts: Average Monthly Volume (Bbls) 184,313 301,600 312,000 160,000 Weighted-average fixed price $ 74.27 $ 85.00 $ 83.74 $ 85.52 Basis swaps: Average Monthly Volume (Bbls) 99,000 37,500 — — Spread $ (12.28 ) $ (12.20 ) $ — $ — Purchased put option contracts: Average Monthly Volume (Bbls) 60,000 — — — Weighted-average strike price $ 40.00 $ — $ — $ — Weighted-average deferred premium $ (0.86 ) $ — $ — $ — NGL Derivative Contracts: Fixed price swap contracts: Average Monthly Volume (Bbls) 195,100 43,300 — — Weighted-average fixed price $ 34.01 $ 37.55 $ — $ — Our basis swaps included in the table above are presented on a disaggregated basis below: Remaining 2016 2017 2018 2019 Natural Gas Derivative Contracts: NGPL TexOk basis swaps: Average Monthly Volume (MMBtu) 2,986,667 1,800,000 1,200,000 900,000 Spread-Henry Hub $ (0.07 ) $ (0.07 ) $ (0.03 ) $ 0.01 HSC basis swaps: Average Monthly Volume (MMBtu) 135,000 115,000 115,000 — Spread-Henry Hub $ 0.07 $ 0.14 $ 0.15 $ — CIG basis swaps: Average Monthly Volume (MMBtu) 170,000 — — — Spread-Henry Hub $ (0.30 ) $ — $ — $ — TETCO STX basis swaps: Average Monthly Volume (MMBtu) 270,000 295,000 — — Spread-Henry Hub $ 0.06 $ 0.03 $ — $ — Crude Oil Derivative Contracts: Midway-Sunset basis swaps: Average Monthly Volume (Bbls) 99,000 37,500 — — Spread - Brent $ (12.28 ) $ (12.20 ) $ — $ — Interest Rate Swaps Periodically, we enter into interest rate swaps to mitigate exposure to market rate fluctuations by converting variable interest rates such as those in our credit agreement to fixed interest rates. From time to time we enter into offsetting positions to avoid being economically over-hedged. At June 30, 2016, we had the following interest rate swap open positions: Remaining 2016 2017 2018 Average Monthly Notional (in thousands) $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 300,000 Weighted-average fixed rate 0.943 % 1.612 % 1.427 % Floating rate 1 Month LIBOR 1 Month LIBOR 1 Month LIBOR Balance Sheet Presentation The following table summarizes both: (i) the gross fair value of derivative instruments by the appropriate balance sheet classification even when the derivative instruments are subject to netting arrangements and qualify for net presentation in the balance sheet and (ii) the net recorded fair value as reflected on the balance sheet at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. There was no cash collateral received or pledged associated with our derivative instruments since most of the counterparties, or certain of their affiliates, to our derivative contracts are lenders under our credit agreement. Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives June 30, December 31, June 30, December 31, Type Balance Sheet Location 2016 2015 2016 2015 (In thousands) Commodity contracts Short-term derivative instruments $ 176,076 $ 324,265 $ 34,216 $ 53,581 Interest rate swaps Short-term derivative instruments — — 3,508 1,214 Gross fair value 176,076 324,265 37,724 54,795 Netting arrangements Short-term derivative instruments (35,584 ) (51,945 ) (35,584 ) (51,945 ) Net recorded fair value Short-term derivative instruments $ 140,492 $ 272,320 $ 2,140 $ 2,850 Commodity contracts Long-term derivative instruments $ 343,646 $ 492,730 $ 13,005 $ 30,920 Interest rate swaps Long-term derivative instruments — — 3,630 1,441 Gross fair value 343,646 492,730 16,635 32,361 Netting arrangements Long-term derivative instruments (14,415 ) (30,920 ) (14,415 ) (30,920 ) Net recorded fair value Long-term derivative instruments $ 329,231 $ 461,810 $ 2,220 $ 1,441 (Gains) Losses on Derivatives We do not designate derivative instruments as hedging instruments for accounting and financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, all gains and losses, including changes in the derivative instruments’ fair values, have been recorded in the accompanying statements of operations. The following table details the gains and losses related to derivative instruments for the periods indicated (in thousands): For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months Ended Statements of June 30, June 30, Operations Location 2016 2015 2016 2015 Commodity derivative contracts (Gain) loss on commodity derivatives $ 124,580 $ 61,403 $ 72,835 $ (84,056 ) Interest rate derivatives Interest expense, net 1,844 644 5,526 3,085 |