The Company maintains its cash in institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). All other deposit accounts at FDIC-insured institutions were insured up to at least $250,000 per depositor until December 31, 2009. On January 1, 2010, FDIC deposit insurance for all deposit accounts, except for certain retirement accounts, returned to $100,000 per depositor. The Company had no deposits in excess of insured amounts as of February 28, 2013.
The Company has evaluated events and transactions that occurred subsequent to February 28, 2013 through April 9, 2013, the date the interim financial statements were available to be issued, for potential recognition or disclosure in the accompanying financial statements. Other than the disclosures above, the Company did not identify any events or transactions that should be recognized or disclosed in the accompanying financial statements.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Overview
Mobile Vault, Inc. is a development stage company that was incorporated on May 18, 2011, to provide mobile security and privacy protection. The Company plans to provide mobile users the ability to check where files have come from, securely back up the data on their mobile phones, check social networks for bad links and other threats, and provide warning of unsafe websites and monitors the phone for suspicious behavior to quickly detect attacks, viruses, and malware activities.
Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and segment data and in conjunction with the Company’s S-1 and amended S-1/A’s. Results or interim periods may not be indicative of results for the full year.
During the third quarter of the fiscal year 2013, the Company continued to focus on developing software prototypes and demos for its mobile security offering. In addition, the Company continued the development of its financial planning for 2014.
The Company did not generate any revenue during the three months ended February 28, 2013.
Total expenses for the three (3) months ended February 28, 2013 were $2,022 resulting in an operating loss for the period of $2,022 as compared to total expenses of $575 for three months ended February 29, 2012. The increase in expenses was due primarily to accounting and professional fees as well as SEC filing and XBRL fees in the quarter ended February 28, 2013.
General and Administrative expenses for the three (3) months ended February 28, 2013 were $1,272. Professional fees were $750 for accounting and legal services.
Total expenses for the nine (9) months ended February 28, 2013 were $9,092 resulting in an operating loss for the period of $9,092 as compared to total expenses of $2,792 for nine months ended February 29, 2012. The increase in expenses was due primarily to accounting and professional fees as well as SEC filing and XBRL fees for the nine month period ended February 28, 2013.
General and Administrative expenses for the nine (9) months ended February 28, 2013 were $4,092. Professional fees were $5,000 for accounting and legal services.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At February 28, 2013 we had working capital of -$8,068 consisting of cash on hand of $1,390 plus accounts receivable credit of $621. The company has $10,078 in current liabilities. The Company’s working capital was $1,024 at May 31, 2012 and cash and receivables of $2,224.
Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended February 28, 2013 was $10,292 as compared to $6,513 for the period ending February 29, 2012. The increase was primarily to accounting and professional fees as well as SEC filing and XBRL fees.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:
| | |
| · | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; |
- 11 -
| | |
| · | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and |
| | |
| · | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
As of February 28, 2013 management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.
The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and (3) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of February 28, 2013.
Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2) and (3) above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.
Management’s Remediation Initiatives
In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:
We will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us. And, we plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when funds are available to us.
Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.
We anticipate that these initiatives will be at least partially, if not fully, implemented by May 31, 2013. Additionally, we plan to test our updated controls and remediate our deficiencies by May 31, 2013.
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
- 12 -
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
None.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
| |
31.1 | Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of principal executive officer |
| |
31.2 | Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of principal financial and accounting officer |
| |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer |
| |
101 * | Interactive Data Files of Financial Statements and Notes. |
* In accordance with Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed”.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| Mobile Vault, Inc. |
| | |
April 15, 2013 | By: | /s/ Danielle Olsen |
| | Danielle Olsen President, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Sole Director |
- 13 -