Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
MPT Finance Corporation
November 24, 2020
Page 2
The opinions set forth below are limited to the Maryland General Corporation Law, the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act and the law of New York
Based on the foregoing, and subject to the additional qualifications set forth below, we are of the opinion that:
(1) Upon the due execution and delivery of the Supplemental Indenture by each of the parties thereto and the execution, authentication and issuance of the Notes against payment therefor pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement and in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, the Notes will be valid and binding obligations of the Issuers, enforceable against the Issuers in accordance with their terms.
(2) Upon the due execution and delivery of the Supplemental Indenture by each of the parties thereto, the execution, authentication and issuance of the Notes against payment therefor pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement and in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and the execution and issuance of the Note Guarantee in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, the Note Guarantee will be a valid and binding obligation of the Guarantor, enforceable against the Guarantor in accordance with its terms.
The opinions set forth above are subject to the following additional qualifications:
(i) Our opinions set forth above as to enforceability are subject to and limited by the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws of general application affecting the rights and remedies of creditors and to general principles of equity.
(ii) Without limiting the qualification in clause (i) above, we express no opinion with respect to: (a) the Guarantor being primarily liable rather than liable as a surety; (b) the waiver of modifications of any guaranteed obligation to the extent such modifications constitute a novation; or (c) the election of remedies that may impair the subrogation or reimbursement rights of the Guarantor against the principal obligor or otherwise prejudice the Guarantor without its consent.
(iii) We express no opinion with respect to any provision of any of the Subject Documents relating to: (a) non-reliance, exculpation, disclaimer, limitation of liability, indemnification, contribution, waiver, limitation or exclusion of remedies; (b) liquidated damages, forfeitures, default interest, late charges, make-whole premiums, payment of attorneys’ fees, collection upon acceleration of amounts that might be determined to constitute unearned interest thereon, or other economic remedies, in each case to the extent it constitutes a penalty or is prohibited by law; (c) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith, fair dealing or unconscionability; (d) governing law (except for the enforceability of any provision choosing New York law as a Subject Document’s governing law pursuant to the statutes referred to in paragraph (iv) below); (e) the waiver of the right to trial by jury or of usury, stay, extension and similar laws; (f) rights or remedies not being exclusive, not preventing the concurrent assertion of any other right or remedy, being cumulative and exercisable in addition to any other right and remedy, or any delay or omission to exercise any right or remedy not impairing any right or remedy or not constituting a waiver thereof; (g) any obligation or agreement to use best efforts, reasonable best efforts or commercially reasonable efforts; (h) any requirement that a party take further action or enter into further agreements or instruments or provide further assurances; (i) any requirement that amendments or waivers be in writing insofar as they suggest that oral or other modifications, amendments or waivers could not be effectively agreed upon by the parties or that the doctrine of promissory estoppel might not apply; (j) service of process by any method not provided for under applicable statute or court rule; and (k) the severability of any provisions to the foregoing effect to the extent such provisions are unenforceable.
(iv) To the extent that any opinion set forth herein relates to the enforceability of the choice of New York law, choice of New York forum or exclusive jurisdiction provisions in any of the Subject Documents, such opinion is rendered solely in reliance upon N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law §§ 5-1401, 5-1402 (McKinney 2010) and N.Y. CPLR 327(b) (McKinney 2010) and is subject to the qualification that such enforceability may be limited by public policy or other considerations of any jurisdiction, other than the State of New York, in which enforcement of such provisions, or of a judgment upon an agreement containing such provisions, is sought and by constitutional limitations. With respect