| SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 3 Months Ended |
| 31-May-14 |
| Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
| Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
| Basis of presentation |
|
| These financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents |
|
| The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had cash equivalents of $2,360 at May 31, 2014 and $1,336 at February 28, 2014. |
|
| Use of estimates and assumptions |
|
| The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences, future results may be affected. Estimates used in preparing these financial statements include the carrying value of the equipment, deferred income tax amounts, rates and timing of the reversal of income tax differences. |
|
| Mineral property costs |
|
| The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation on May 7, 2010 and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property acquisition and exploration costs are charged to operations as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property, are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve. |
|
| Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share |
|
| The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260 “Earnings Per Share” which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) for the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. Because the Company does not have any potentially dilutive securities, diluted loss per share is equal to the basic loss per share. |
|
| Comprehensive loss |
|
| For all periods presented, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a statement of comprehensive loss in these financial statements. |
|
| Financial instruments |
|
| The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments consisting of cash, accounts payable, and amounts due to related party approximate their carrying values due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The Company operates in Australia and therefore is exposed to foreign exchange risk. It is management's opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. |
|
| Fair value of financial instruments |
|
| The Company adopted ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements”. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows: |
|
| Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
| Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
| Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement. |
|
| The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. |
|
| The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014: |
|
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| 31-May-14 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| 28-Feb-14 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
|
| Income taxes |
|
| Deferred income taxes are provided for tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of asset and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes, which requires deferred taxes to be recorded at the statutory rate expected to being in effect when the taxes are paid. Valuation allowances are provided for a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that such asset will not be realized. |
|
| Management evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position includes a determination of whether a tax position should be recognized in the financial statements, and such a position should only be recognized if the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities, based upon the technical merits of the position. For those tax positions that should be recognized, the measurement of a tax position is determined as being the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. |
|
| Stock-based compensation |
|
| The Company has not adopted a stock option plan and therefore has not granted any stock options. Accordingly, no stock-based compensation has been recorded to date. |
|
| Foreign currency translation |
|
| Foreign denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated to their United States dollar equivalents using foreign exchange rates which prevailed at the balance sheet date. Expenses are translated at average rates of exchange during the period. Related translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity, whereas gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in results of operations. |
|
| Exploration stage company |
|
| The Company complies with ASC 915 and Securities and Exchange Commission Act Guide 7 for its characterization of the Company as an Exploration stage enterprise. |
|
| Recent accounting pronouncements |
|
| New accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed below, management believes there have been no developments to recently issued accounting standards, including expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on our financial statements, from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2014. |
|
| Change in management |
|
| Effective July 22, 2013, (a) Lena Gencarelli resigned as the Company’s sole director, and president, and (b) Stuart Carnie was appointed as the Company’s sole director and president. Effective May 12, 2014, Stuart Carnie resigned as the Company’s sole director and president and Lena Gencarelli was reappointed as the Company’s president and sole director. Effective June 12, 2014 Lena Gencarelli resigned as the Company’s president and sole director and Nicholas Soo was appointed as the Company’s president and sole director. |
|
