Bahamas Concierge 10-Q 28 Oct 13 2014 Q1 Quarterly report Financial data

Document_And_Entity_Informatio

Document And Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013	Oct. 24, 2013
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	BAHAMAS CONCIERGE, INC.
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	-26
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		5,062,500
Amendment Flag	FALSE
Entity Central Index Key	1526759
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	31-Aug-13
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

Balance_Sheets_Current_Period_

Balance Sheets (Current Period Unaudited) (USD $)	Aug. 31, 2013	31-May-13
ASSETS
Cash	$9,878	$11,878
Total Assets	9,878	11,878
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	68,566	56,735
Notes payable	87,500	87,500
Due to related parties	5,001	2,936
Total Liabilities	161,067	147,171
Preferred Stock
Authorized: 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; Issued and outstanding: nil preferred shares	0	0
Common Stock
Authorized: 1000,000,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; Issued and outstanding: 5,062,500 common shares at August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013, respectively	5,063	5,063
Additional paid-in capital	39,937	39,937
Deficit accumulated during development stage	-196,189	-180,293
Total Stockholders’ Deficit	-151,189	-135,293
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$9,878	$11,878

Balance_Sheets_Current_Period_1

Balance Sheets (Current Period Unaudited) (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Aug. 31, 2013	31-May-13
Preferred Stock, Shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred Stock, Par Value (in Dollars per share)	$0.00	$0.00
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	1,000,000,000,000	1,000,000,000,000
Common Stock, Par Value (in Dollars per share)	$0.00	$0.00
Common Stock, Shares Issued	5,062,500	5,062,500
Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	5,062,500	5,062,500

Statements_of_Operations_Unaud

Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		28 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013	Aug. 31, 2012	Aug. 31, 2013
Revenues	$0	$0	$0
Operating Expenses
General and administrative	1,690	1,362	33,334
Management fees		3,000	25,000
Professional fees	12,000	12,250	121,750
Total Operating Expenses	13,690	16,612	180,084
Loss from operations	-13,690	-16,612	-180,084
Gain on forgiveness of liabilities			750
Interest expense	-2,206	-2,205	-16,855
Total other income (expense)	-2,206	-2,205	-16,105
Net Loss	($15,896)	($18,817)	($196,189)
Net Loss per Share – Basic and Diluted (in Dollars per share)	$0	$0
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted (in Shares)	5,062,500	4,500,000

Statements_of_Cashflows_Unaudi

Statements of Cashflows (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		31 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013	Aug. 31, 2012	Aug. 31, 2013
Net loss	($15,896)	($18,817)	($196,189)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Gain on forgiveness of liabilities			-750
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		4,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	11,831	11,495	69,316
Due to related parties	2,065	975	5,001
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities	-2,000	-2,347	-122,622
Financing Activities
Proceeds from note payable			87,500
Proceeds from issuance of common stock			45,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities			132,500
Increase (Decrease) in Cash	-2,000	-2,347	9,878
Cash – Beginning of Period	11,878	2,536
Cash – End of Period	9,878	189	9,878
Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid	0	0	0
Income tax paid	0	0	0
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Shares issued to founders			$4,500

Note_1_Nature_of_Operations_an

Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]	1.     Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business
	Bahamas Concierge, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 2, 2011. The Company is a development stage company, as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915, Development Stage Entities.
	Going Concern
	These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As of August 31, 2013, the Company has not recognized any revenue, and has a working capital deficit of $151,189 and an accumulated deficit of $196,189. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]	2.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
		a)	Basis of Presentation
	The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year end is May 31.
		b)	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
		c)	Cash and cash equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013, the Company had no cash equivalents.
		d)	Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
	The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.   The Company did not have any potentially dilutive common stock as of August 31, 2013 and 2012.
		e)	Financial Instruments
	Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
	Level 1
	Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
	Level 2
	Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
	Level 3
	Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
	The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, current notes payable, and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.
	The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013:
									Total Realized Loss
			$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Totals		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
		f)	Comprehensive Loss
	ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As of August 31, 2013, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.
		g)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
		-	Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
		-	Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.
	The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
		g)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements(continued)
	In October 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.

Note_3_Notes_Payable

Note 3 - Notes Payable	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Debt Disclosure [Text Block]	3.     Notes Payable
		a)	On May 3, 2011, the Company issued a $17,500 note to a non-related party. Under the terms of the note, the amount is unsecured, due interest at 10% per annum, and due on demand. As at August 31, 2013, the Company recorded accrued interest of $4,082 (May 31, 2013 - $3,639), which has been recorded as accrued liabilities.
		b)	On July 1, 2011, the Company issued a $5,000 note to a non-related party. Under the terms of the note, the amount is unsecured, due interest at 10% per annum, and due on demand. As at August 31, 2013, the Company recorded accrued interest of $1,086 (May 31, 2013 - $960), which has been recorded as accrued liabilities.
		c)	On July 5, 2011, the Company issued a $20,000 note to a non-related party. Under the terms of the note, the amount is unsecured, due interest at 10% per annum, and due on demand. As at August 31, 2013, the Company recorded accrued interest of $4,323 (May 31, 2013 - $3,819), which has been recorded as accrued liabilities.
		d)	On October 24, 2011, the Company issued a $20,000 note to a non-related party. Under the terms of the note, the amount is unsecured, due interest at 10% per annum, and due on demand. As at May 31, 2013, the Company recorded accrued interest of $3,879 (May 31, 2013 - $3,375), which has been recorded as accrued liabilities.
		e)	On April 10, 2012, the Company issued a $25,000 note to a non-related party. Under the terms of the note, the amount is unsecured, due interest at 10% per annum, and due on demand. As at May 31, 2013, the Company recorded accrued interest of $3,486 (May 31, 2013 - $2,856), which has been recorded as accrued liabilities.

Note_4_Related_Party_Transacti

Note 4 - Related Party Transactions	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]	4.     Related Party Transactions
		a)	During the three months ended August 31, 2013, the Company incurred management fees of $nil (May 31, 2013 - $3,000) to the former President and Director of the Company.
		b)	As at August 31, 2013, the Company owes $936 (May 31, 2013 - $2,936) to the former President and Director of the Company for payment of general expenses. The amount owing is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.
		c)	As at August 31, 2013, the Company owes $2,065 (May 31, 2013 - $nil) to a related party, the immediate family member of the President and Director of the Company for payment of general expenses. The amount owing is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.
		d)	As at August 31, 2013, the Company owes $2,000 (May 31, 2013 - $nil) to Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company for payment of general expenses. The amount owing is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

Note_5_Common_Shares

Note 5 - Common Shares	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Stockholders' Equity Note [Abstract]
Stockholders' Equity Note Disclosure [Text Block]	5.     Common Shares
	On October 25, 2012, the Company issued 562,500 common shares at $0.08 per share for proceeds of $45,000.
	On June 25, 2013, Nina Goldstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, purchased 4,500,000 shares of the Company's stock from the former President and Director of the Company in exchange for $22,500.00. This represents approximately 89% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company. As a result of this, the Board accepted the resignation of David Williams as a Director and Officer of the Company and appointed Nina Goldstein as the Chairperson of the Board and to act as the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. The Board also appointed Sondra Trust, R.N., B.S. as a Director on the Board and to act as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and President
	On August 21, 3013, an amendment to the articles of incorporation was filed to increase the total authorized common stock from 290,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, to 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock.

Note_6_Subsequent_Events

Note 6 - Subsequent Events	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Events [Text Block]	6.     Subsequent Events
	On October 10, 2013, the Company issued a 5 % promissory note for $20,000, due in sixty days, to a related party. The note holder has the right to convert, at any time, the unpaid principal balance and interest for $0.25 per share.

Accounting_Policies_by_Policy_

Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]	a)	Basis of Presentation
	The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year end is May 31.
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]	b)	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]	c)	Cash and cash equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013, the Company had no cash equivalents.
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]	d)	Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
	The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.   The Company did not have any potentially dilutive common stock as of August 31, 2013 and 2012.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]	e)	Financial Instruments
	Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
	Level 1
	Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
	Level 2
	Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
	Level 3
	Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
	The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, current notes payable, and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.
	The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013:
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block]	f)	Comprehensive Loss
	ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As of August 31, 2013, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.
Schedule of New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Table Text Block]	g)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
		-	Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
		-	Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.
	The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
		g)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements(continued)
	In October 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_1

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Table Text Block]								Total Realized Loss
		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Totals	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Note_1_Nature_of_Operations_an1

Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business (Details) (USD $)	Aug. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
working capital deficit	$151,189
Deficit accumulated	$196,189

Note_2_Summary_of_Significant_2

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured and Recognized at Fair Value (USD $)	Aug. 31, 2013
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
	$0
Totals	0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
	0
Totals	0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
	0
Totals	0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
	0
Totals	$0

Note_3_Notes_Payable_Details

Note 3 - Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)	Aug. 31, 2013	Jul. 05, 2013	31-May-13	Apr. 10, 2013	Oct. 24, 2011	Jul. 01, 2011	3-May-11
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Unsecured Notes Payable		$20,000		$25,000	$20,000	$5,000	$17,500
Rate of Interest on Notes Payable		10.00%		10.00%	10.00%	10.00%	10.00%
Interest on Notes issued On May 3, 2011	4,082		3,639
Interest on Notes issued On July 1, 2011	1,086		960
Interest on Notes issued On July 5, 2011	4,323		3,819
Interest on Notes issued On October 24, 2011	3,879		3,375
Interest on Notes issued On April 10, 2012	$3,486		$2,856

Note_4_Related_Party_Transacti1

Note 4 - Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	31-May-13	Aug. 31, 2013
Note 4 - Related Party Transactions (Details) [Line Items]
Management fees incurred to the President and Director of the Company	$3,000
General expenses owed to the President and Director of the Company	2,936	936
Due to Related Parties	2,936	5,001
Immediate Family Member of Management or Principal Owner [Member]
Note 4 - Related Party Transactions (Details) [Line Items]
Due to Related Parties		2,065
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary [Member]
Note 4 - Related Party Transactions (Details) [Line Items]
Due to Related Parties		$2,000

Note_5_Common_Shares_Details

Note 5 - Common Shares (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013	Aug. 21, 2013	Aug. 20, 2013	31-May-13	Oct. 25, 2012
Note 5 - Common Shares (Details) [Line Items]
Common shares issued to non-related parties					562,500
Per share value issued to non-related parties (in Dollars per share)					$0.08
Proceeds of common shares issued to non-related parties (in Dollars)					$45,000
Stock Issued and Outstanding Percent	89.00%
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	1,000,000,000,000	1,000,000,000	290,000,000	1,000,000,000,000
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share (in Dollars per share)	$0.00	$0.00		$0.00
President and Director [Member]
Note 5 - Common Shares (Details) [Line Items]
Sale of Stock, Number of Shares Issued in Transaction	4,500,000
Sale of Stock, Consideration Received on Transaction (in Dollars)	$22,500

Note_6_Subsequent_Events_Detai

Note 6 - Subsequent Events (Details) (Subsequent Event [Member], Promissory Note [Member], USD $)	0 Months Ended
	Oct. 10, 2013
Subsequent Event [Member] | Promissory Note [Member]
Note 6 - Subsequent Events (Details) [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	5.00%
Debt Instrument, Face Amount (in Dollars)	$20,000
Debt Instrument, Term	60 years
Debt Instrument, Convertible, Conversion Price (in Dollars per share)	$0.25