Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 28, 2015 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ignite and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of December 28, 2015. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. On April 17, 2015, we completed the sale of Romano’s Macaroni Grill (“Macaroni Grill”). As of December 29, 2014, the assets and associated liabilities of Macaroni Grill have been reclassified as discontinued operations. The operating results of Macaroni Grill for the current and prior periods have been aggregated and reclassified as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3 for further discussion. |
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fiscal Year Our fiscal year ends on the Monday nearest to December 31 of each year. Fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 were all 52-week years. References to 2015, 2014 and 2013 are references to fiscal years ended December 28, 2015, December 29, 2014 and December 30, 2013, respectively. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value Measurements We apply fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. We define fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value, we assume the highest and best use of the asset by market participants in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and credit risk. We apply the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels, and base the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement: Level 1— Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2— Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3— Inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement reflect an entity’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
Financial Instruments Policy [Policy Text Block] | Financial Instruments We record all financial instruments at cost, which is the fair value at the date of transaction. The amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition Revenues from food and beverage sales are recognized when payment is tendered at the point-of-sale and are presented net of promotional allowances, discounts, and employee meals. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis, or excluded from revenues, in our consolidated statements of operations. Initial franchise fees received are deferred and recognized as revenue upon opening of the franchised restaurant, which is when we have performed substantially all initial services required by the franchise agreement. Continuing licensing and royalty revenues are recognized when earned. Licensing and royalty revenues were $0.2 million, $4 thousand and $60 thousand in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of gift cards are deferred and recognized as revenue upon redemption. Deferred gift card revenue is included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Our gift cards do not have an expiration date and we do not deduct non-usage fees from outstanding gift card balances. We recognize gift card breakage income exclusive of amounts subject to state escheatment laws when the likelihood of redemption of the cards becomes remote. We recorded breakage income of $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which is included in revenues in our consolidated statements of operations. We also benefit from certain vendor rebates which are recorded as a reduction to cost of sales. Additionally, we may enter into certain contracts that provide marketing allowances, which are amortized over the life of the contract. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider cash on hand in restaurants, deposits in banks, and short-term marketable securities with original maturities of 90 days or less as cash and cash equivalents. |
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, represent their estimated net realizable value, and includes receivables from credit card processors, franchisees, the sale of gift cards in retail outlets, and allowances due to us from landlords based on lease terms. |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, and consist of food, beverage, and retail merchandise. Inventory cost is determined using the average cost method. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and Equipment Property and equipment acquired is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method, based on the following estimated useful lives: Leasehold improvements Shorter of effective lease term or estimated useful life Restaurant equipment 10 years Furniture and fixtures 5 – 10 years Computer equipment and software 3 – 5 years We capitalize major replacements and improvements that increase the useful life of the asset, whereas we expense repairs and maintenance as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation and impairment of assets sold, retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the balance sheet and any gain or loss is included in the statement of operations. We capitalize direct costs associated with the site acquisition and construction of restaurant units, including direct internal payroll and payroll-related costs, incremental travel expenses, and interest cost as leasehold improvements. If we subsequently determine that we will not continue acquiring or developing a project for which we have been capitalizing costs, any previously capitalized internal development and third-party costs will be written off as dead deals and included in general and administrative expenses. |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived assets, including property and equipment, whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Our review for impairment of these long-lived assets takes into account estimates of future undiscounted cash flows (level 3 in the fair value hierarchy). Factors considered include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business, and significant negative industry or economic trends. Our asset group for impairment testing is comprised of the assets and liabilities of each of our individual restaurants, since this is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. An impairment loss is recognized if the future undiscounted cash flows associated with the assets are less than their carrying value. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying values of the assets exceed their fair values. For assets held for sale or disposal, we measure fair value using quoted market prices or an estimation of net realizable value. From time to time, we have decided to close or dispose of restaurants. Typically, such decisions are made based on operating performance or strategic considerations and must be made before the actual costs or proceeds of disposition are known, and management must make estimates of these outcomes. Such outcomes could include the sale of a leasehold, mitigating costs through a tenant or subtenant, or negotiating a buyout of a remaining lease term. In these instances, management evaluates possible outcomes, frequently using outside real estate and legal advice, and records provisions for the effect of such outcomes. The accuracy of such provisions can vary materially from original estimates, and management regularly monitors the adequacy of the provisions until final disposition occurs. We recorded impairment charges of $9.4 million and $1.8 million in fiscal year 2015 and 2014, respectively, which is included in asset impairments and closures in our consolidated statements of operations, related to Joe’s long-lived assets (see Note 7). For assets held for sale or disposal, we measure fair value using quoted market prices or an estimation of net realizable value. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Intangible Assets We recognize acquired intangible assets apart from goodwill whenever the intangible asset arises from contractual or other legal rights, or whenever it can be separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, either individually or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability. Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of intangible assets with definite useful lives whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be fully recoverable. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying value of an intangible asset is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value. Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands): December 28, 2015 December 29, 2014 Cost Accumulated Amortization and Impairment Carrying Value Cost Accumulated Amortization and Impairment Carrying Value Definite lived: Trademarks $ 4,580 $ 4,029 $ 551 $ 4,580 $ 3,571 $ 1,009 Indefinite lived: Liquor licenses 4,931 - 4,931 4,931 - 4,931 $ 9,511 $ 4,029 $ 5,482 $ 9,511 $ 3,571 $ 5,940 The costs of purchasing transferable liquor licenses through open markets in jurisdictions with a limited number of authorized liquor licenses are capitalized as indefinite-lived intangibles and included in intangible assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets. The costs of obtaining non-transferable liquor licenses that are directly issued by local government agencies are expensed as incurred. Annual liquor license renewal fees are expensed over the renewal term. Liquor licenses are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We determined estimated fair value based on prices in the open market for licenses in similar jurisdictions (level 2 in the fair value hierarchy). No impairment charge for liquor licenses was recorded in 2015, 2014 and 2013. Definite-lived trademarks are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of 10 years. Amortization expense for definite-lived trademarks was approximately $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Scheduled amortization of definite-lived intangible assets is as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year Amount 2016 $ 387 2017 35 2018 35 2019 29 2020 15 Thereafter 50 $ 551 |
Deferred Charges, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Deferred Charges Debt issuance costs representing costs to obtain long-term financing are accounted for as a deferred charge and are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. They are amortized using the interest method for the term loan and straight-line method for the revolving credit facility over the term of the related financing. Amortization of debt issuance costs, which was approximately $1.7 million, $3.1 million and $1.1 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is included in interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations. See Note 6 regarding write-off of debt issuance costs related to debt paydown and refinancing transactions. |
Lease, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Leases We currently lease all of our restaurant locations under leases classified as operating leases. Minimum base rent for our operating leases, which generally have escalating rentals over the term of the lease, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As such, an equal amount of rent expense is attributed to each period during the term of the lease regardless of when actual payments occur. Lease terms begin on the date we take effective control of the property and include cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. The difference between rent expense and actual cash payments is classified as deferred rent in the consolidated balance sheets. Certain leases contain provisions that require additional rental payments based upon restaurant sales volume. Contingent rentals are accrued each period as the liabilities are incurred, in addition to the straight-line rent expense noted above. |
Insurance Liabilities [Policy Text Block] | Insurance Liabilities We maintain large deductibles on workers’ compensation, general liability, property, and business interruption insurance coverage. These policies have been structured to limit our per-occurrence exposure. Our estimated liabilities for workers’ compensation and general liability are undiscounted and are based on our judgment regarding a number of assumptions and factors, including the frequency and severity of claims, claims development history, case jurisdiction, applicable legislation, and our claims settlement practices. |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Advertising Expenses Advertising production costs are expensed at the time the advertising is first aired. All other advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses were approximately $22.9 million for each of the fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, and are included in other operating expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. |
Start-up Activities, Cost Policy [Policy Text Block] | Pre-opening Costs Non-capital expenditures associated with the opening of new or converted restaurants are expensed as incurred. Pre-opening costs consist of costs incurred prior to opening a new or converted restaurant and are made up primarily of manager salaries, employee payroll, and other costs related to training and preparing new or converted restaurants for opening. Pre-opening costs also include an accrual for straight-line rent recorded during the period between the date we take effective control of our leased properties and the restaurant opening date. |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-based Compensation We recognize expense for stock-based compensation awards, which is equal to the fair value of the awards at grant date, ratably in labor expenses and general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations over the requisite service period. The following table provides the significant weighted average assumptions used to determine the fair value of stock appreciation rights on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for awards granted during the fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013: Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 Expected term (in years) 6.3 6.3 6.3% Expected volatility 43.9% 42.5% 46.3% Dividend yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Risk-free interest rate 1.5% - 1.9% 1.7% - 2.0% 1.2% - 2.2% Since we have limited historical exercise experience on stock appreciation rights, we used the simplified method of estimating expected term. We estimated expected volatility by supplementing our own historical volatility with the volatility of a peer group over a recent historical period equal to the same expected term of the award. The expected dividend yield is based on our history of not paying regular dividends in the past and our current intention to not pay regular dividends in the foreseeable future. Risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant using the term equal to our expected term. Restricted stock is valued using the closing stock price of the business day prior to the grant date. |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes We are subject to U.S. federal income tax and income taxes imposed in the state and local jurisdictions where we operate our restaurants. Deferred income taxes are provided on temporary differences between financial statement and income tax reporting. Temporary differences are differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities reported for financial statement purposes and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized for temporary differences that will be deductible in future years’ tax returns and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We evaluate our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis to determine whether a valuation allowance is required. We assess whether a valuation allowance should be established based on our determination of whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that will be taxable in future years’ tax returns. We account for uncertain tax positions using a minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial statement benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold is defined as a tax position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. See Note 9 for information regarding changes in our unrecognized tax benefits. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Net Income (Loss) per Share Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, while diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus all potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the period. The following table summarizes the components to determine the denominators of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands): Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 Denominator: Basic weighted average shares outstanding 25,731 25,659 25,629 Effect of dilutive securities - - 7 Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 25,731 25,659 25,636 For fiscal year 2015, we excluded 1.2 million stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and 405 thousand shares of restricted stock from the calculation of net loss per share, and for fiscal year 2014, we excluded 1.6 million SARs and 510 thousand shares of restricted stock from the calculation of net loss per share because the effect was anti-dilutive due to the net loss during the respective periods. For fiscal year 2013, we excluded 1.2 million SARs from the calculation of net loss per share because their effect was anti-dilutive. |
Commitments and Contingencies, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Claims and Other Contingencies We recognize legal claims and other loss contingencies when information becomes available indicating that a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Predicting the outcome of claims and litigation involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from estimates. We recognize legal expenses, including those related to loss contingencies, as incurred. Generally, we do not recognize gain contingencies until all contingencies have been resolved, but we recognize gain contingencies that are recoveries of previously recognized contingent losses when realization of the recovery is deemed probable and reasonably estimable. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board issued a converged standard on revenue recognition, Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Agreement In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . |