Investments | 2. Investments AFS Securities — Our AFS investment portfolio includes bonds, collateralized loan obligations (CLO), asset-backed securities (ABS), commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), RMBS and redeemable preferred stock. Our AFS investment portfolio includes related party investments that are primarily a result of investments over which Apollo can exercise significant influence. These investments are presented as investments in related parties on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and are separately disclosed below. The following table represents the amortized cost, allowance for credit losses, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of our AFS investments by asset type: March 31, 2020 (In millions) Amortized Cost Allowance for Credit Losses Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value AFS securities U.S. government and agencies $ 37 $ — $ 3 $ — $ 40 U.S. state, municipal and political subdivisions 815 — 102 (8 ) 909 Foreign governments 278 — 14 (1 ) 291 Corporate 44,315 (15 ) 2,138 (1,970 ) 44,468 CLO 8,057 — 4 (1,420 ) 6,641 ABS 4,970 (5 ) 32 (434 ) 4,563 CMBS 2,431 (4 ) 65 (201 ) 2,291 RMBS 6,673 (54 ) 116 (267 ) 6,468 Total AFS securities 67,576 (78 ) 2,474 (4,301 ) 65,671 AFS securities – related party Corporate 18 — 1 — 19 CLO 1,226 — — (186 ) 1,040 ABS 2,760 — 1 (274 ) 2,487 Total AFS securities – related party 4,004 — 2 (460 ) 3,546 Total AFS securities including related party $ 71,580 $ (78 ) $ 2,476 $ (4,761 ) $ 69,217 The following table represents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and other than temporary impairments (OTTI) in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) of our AFS investments by asset type: December 31, 2019 (In millions) Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value OTTI in AOCI AFS securities U.S. government and agencies $ 35 $ 1 $ — $ 36 $ — U.S. state, municipal and political subdivisions 1,322 220 (1 ) 1,541 — Foreign governments 298 29 — 327 — Corporate 44,106 3,332 (210 ) 47,228 1 CLO 7,524 21 (196 ) 7,349 — ABS 5,018 124 (24 ) 5,118 4 CMBS 2,304 104 (8 ) 2,400 1 RMBS 6,872 513 (10 ) 7,375 19 Total AFS securities 67,479 4,344 (449 ) 71,374 25 AFS securities – related party Corporate 18 1 — 19 — CLO 951 3 (18 ) 936 — ABS 2,814 37 (2 ) 2,849 — Total AFS securities – related party 3,783 41 (20 ) 3,804 — Total AFS securities including related party $ 71,262 $ 4,385 $ (469 ) $ 75,178 $ 25 The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities, including related party, are shown by contractual maturity below: March 31, 2020 (In millions) Amortized Cost Fair Value AFS securities Due in one year or less $ 1,070 $ 1,064 Due after one year through five years 9,168 9,050 Due after five years through ten years 11,040 10,823 Due after ten years 24,167 24,771 CLO, ABS, CMBS and RMBS 22,131 19,963 Total AFS securities 67,576 65,671 AFS securities – related party Due after one year through five years 18 19 CLO and ABS 3,986 3,527 Total AFS securities – related party 4,004 3,546 Total AFS securities including related party $ 71,580 $ 69,217 Actual maturities can differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Unrealized Losses on AFS Securities — The following summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses for AFS securities, including related party, for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, aggregated by asset type and length of time the fair value has remained below amortized cost: March 31, 2020 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total (In millions) Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Fair Value Gross AFS securities U.S. state, municipal and political subdivisions $ 157 $ (7 ) $ 10 $ (1 ) $ 167 $ (8 ) Foreign governments 43 (1 ) — — 43 (1 ) Corporate 15,956 (1,842 ) 335 (127 ) 16,291 (1,969 ) CLO 3,996 (751 ) 2,436 (637 ) 6,432 (1,388 ) ABS 3,255 (395 ) 108 (24 ) 3,363 (419 ) CMBS 1,082 (183 ) 36 (5 ) 1,118 (188 ) RMBS 2,856 (176 ) 30 (4 ) 2,886 (180 ) Total AFS securities 27,345 (3,355 ) 2,955 (798 ) 30,300 (4,153 ) AFS securities – related party Corporate 3 — — — 3 — CLO 887 (144 ) 153 (42 ) 1,040 (186 ) ABS 2,389 (274 ) — — 2,389 (274 ) Total AFS securities – related party 3,279 (418 ) 153 (42 ) 3,432 (460 ) Total AFS securities including related party $ 30,624 $ (3,773 ) $ 3,108 $ (840 ) $ 33,732 $ (4,613 ) The following summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses for AFS securities, including related party, aggregated by asset type and length of time the fair value has remained below amortized cost: December 31, 2019 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total (In millions) Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses AFS securities U.S. government and agencies $ 3 $ — $ — $ — $ 3 $ — U.S. state, municipal and political subdivisions 78 (1 ) 10 — 88 (1 ) Corporate 2,898 (140 ) 902 (70 ) 3,800 (210 ) CLO 1,959 (38 ) 3,241 (158 ) 5,200 (196 ) ABS 642 (6 ) 255 (18 ) 897 (24 ) CMBS 220 (4 ) 41 (4 ) 261 (8 ) RMBS 445 (6 ) 163 (4 ) 608 (10 ) Total AFS securities 6,245 (195 ) 4,612 (254 ) 10,857 (449 ) AFS securities – related party CLO 362 (7 ) 242 (11 ) 604 (18 ) ABS 357 (2 ) — — 357 (2 ) Total AFS securities – related party 719 (9 ) 242 (11 ) 961 (20 ) Total AFS securities including related party $ 6,964 $ (204 ) $ 4,854 $ (265 ) $ 11,818 $ (469 ) As of March 31, 2020 , we held 4,327 AFS securities that were in an unrealized loss position. Of this total, 346 were in an unrealized loss position 12 months or more. As of March 31, 2020 , we held 104 related party AFS securities that were in an unrealized loss position. Of this total, eight were in an unrealized loss position 12 months or more. The unrealized losses on AFS securities can primarily be attributed to changes in market interest rates since acquisition. We did not recognize the unrealized losses in income as we intend to hold these securities and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell a security before the recovery of its amortized cost. Allowance for Credit Losses — The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for credit losses for AFS securities by asset type: Three months ended March 31, 2020 Additions Reductions (In millions) Beginning balance Initial credit losses Initial credit losses on PCD securities Additions for previously impaired securities Securities sold during the period Ending Balance AFS securities Corporate $ — $ 15 $ — $ — $ — $ 15 ABS — 5 — — — 5 CMBS — 4 — — — 4 RMBS 17 35 1 2 (1 ) 54 Total AFS securities $ 17 $ 59 $ 1 $ 2 $ (1 ) $ 78 Net Investment Income —Net investment income by asset class consists of the following: Three months ended March 31, (In millions) 2020 2019 AFS securities $ 837 $ 753 Trading securities 48 42 Equity securities 4 3 Mortgage loans 186 151 Investment funds (278 ) 26 Funds withheld at interest 41 163 Other 37 39 Investment revenue 875 1,177 Investment expenses (130 ) (95 ) Net investment income $ 745 $ 1,082 Investment Related Gains (Losses) —Investment related gains (losses) by asset class consists of the following: Three months ended March 31, (In millions) 2020 2019 AFS securities Gross realized gains on investment activity $ 164 $ 17 Gross realized losses on investment activity (134 ) (13 ) Net realized investment gains on AFS securities 30 4 Net recognized investment gains (losses) on trading securities (223 ) 56 Net recognized investment gains (losses) on equity securities (50 ) 18 Derivative gains (losses) (3,019 ) 1,692 Provision for credit losses (284 ) — Other gains (losses) (26 ) 6 Investment related gains (losses) $ (3,572 ) $ 1,776 Proceeds from sales of AFS securities were $1,807 million and $1,253 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 , respectively. The following table summarizes the change in unrealized gains (losses) on trading and equity securities we held as of the respective period end: Three months ended March 31, (In millions) 2020 2019 Trading securities $ (73 ) $ 71 Trading securities – related party (109 ) (2 ) Equity securities (37 ) 18 Equity securities – related party — 3 Purchased Financial Assets with Credit Deterioration —During the three months ended March 31, 2020 , we purchased PCD investments with the following amounts at the time of purchase: (In millions) Fixed maturity securities Mortgage loans Purchase price $ 14 $ — Allowance for credit losses at acquisition 1 — Discount (premiums) attributable to other factors 1 — Par value $ 16 $ — Repurchase Agreements— The following table summarizes the maturities of our repurchase agreements: March 31, 2020 Remaining Contractual Maturity (In millions) Overnight and continuous Up to 30 days 30-90 days Greater than 90 days Total Payables for repurchase agreements 1 $ — $ — $ 293 $ 1,001 $ 1,294 1 Included in payables for collateral on derivatives and securities to repurchase on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. December 31, 2019 Remaining Contractual Maturity (In millions) Overnight and continuous Up to 30 days 30-90 days Greater than 90 days Total Payables for repurchase agreements 1 $ — $ 102 $ 200 $ 210 $ 512 1 Included in payables for collateral on derivatives and securities to repurchase on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements: March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 (In millions) Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value AFS securities – Corporate $ 1,328 $ 1,435 $ 498 $ 534 Total securities pledged under repurchase agreements $ 1,328 $ 1,435 $ 498 $ 534 Reverse Repurchase Agreements — Reverse repurchase agreements represent the purchase of investments from a seller with the agreement that the investments will be repurchased by the seller at a specified price and date or within a specified period of time. The investments purchased, which represent collateral on a secured lending arrangement, are not reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheets; however, the secured lending arrangement is recorded as a short-term investment for the principal amount loaned under the agreement. As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 , amounts loaned under reverse repurchase agreements were $190 million and collateral backing the agreement was $616 million and $630 million , respectively. Mortgage Loans, including related party —Mortgage loans, net of allowances, consists of the following: (In millions) March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Commercial mortgage loans $ 11,281 $ 10,422 Commercial mortgage loans under development 140 93 Total commercial mortgage loans 11,421 10,515 Allowance for credit losses on commercial mortgage loans (343 ) (10 ) Commercial mortgage loans, net of allowances 11,078 10,505 Residential mortgage loans 4,021 4,455 Allowance for credit losses on residential mortgage loans (81 ) (1 ) Residential mortgage loans, net of allowances 3,940 4,454 Mortgage loans, net of allowances $ 15,018 $ 14,959 We primarily invest in commercial mortgage loans on income producing properties including office and retail buildings, apartments, hotels and industrial properties. We diversify the commercial mortgage loan portfolio by geographic region and property type to reduce concentration risk. We evaluate mortgage loans based on relevant current information to confirm if properties are performing at a consistent and acceptable level to secure the related debt. The distribution of commercial mortgage loans, including those under development, net of allowances, by property type and geographic region, is as follows: March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 (In millions, except for percentages) Net Carrying Value Percentage of Total Net Carrying Value Percentage of Total Property type Office building $ 3,465 31.2 % $ 2,899 27.6 % Retail 2,117 19.1 % 2,182 20.8 % Apartment 2,333 21.1 % 2,142 20.4 % Hotels 1,062 9.6 % 1,104 10.5 % Industrial 1,402 12.7 % 1,448 13.8 % Other commercial 699 6.3 % 730 6.9 % Total commercial mortgage loans $ 11,078 100.0 % $ 10,505 100.0 % U.S. Region East North Central $ 1,200 10.8 % $ 1,036 9.9 % East South Central 422 3.8 % 428 4.1 % Middle Atlantic 2,953 26.6 % 2,580 24.6 % Mountain 508 4.6 % 528 5.0 % New England 336 3.0 % 340 3.2 % Pacific 2,559 23.1 % 2,502 23.8 % South Atlantic 1,980 17.9 % 1,920 18.3 % West North Central 140 1.3 % 146 1.4 % West South Central 770 7.0 % 791 7.5 % Total U.S. Region 10,868 98.1 % 10,271 97.8 % International Region 210 1.9 % 234 2.2 % Total commercial mortgage loans $ 11,078 100.0 % $ 10,505 100.0 % Our residential mortgage loan portfolio includes first lien residential mortgage loans collateralized by properties in various geographic locations and is summarized by proportion of the portfolio in the following table: March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 U.S. States California 26.5 % 27.0 % Florida 13.5 % 12.7 % Texas 5.3 % 6.2 % Other 1 41.3 % 41.7 % Total U.S. residential mortgage loan percentage 86.6 % 87.6 % International – Ireland 13.4 % 12.4 % Total residential mortgage loan percentage 100.0 % 100.0 % 1 Represents all other states, with each individual state comprising less than 5% of the portfolio. Loan Valuation Allowance — The allowances for our mortgage loan portfolio and other loans is summarized as follows: Three months ended March 31, 2020 (In millions) Commercial Mortgage Residential Mortgage Related Party Other Investments Total Beginning balance $ 10 $ 1 $ — $ 11 Adoption of accounting standard 167 43 11 221 Provision for expected credit losses 166 37 1 204 Ending balance $ 343 $ 81 $ 12 $ 436 Residential mortgage loans – Our allowance model for residential mortgage loans is based on the characteristics of the loans in our portfolio, historical economic data and loss information, and current and forecasted economic conditions. Key loan characteristics affecting the estimate include, among others: time to maturity, delinquency status, original credit scores and loan-to-value ratios. Key macroeconomic variables include unemployment rates and the housing price index. Management reviews and approves forecasted macroeconomic variables, along with the reasonable and supportable forecast period and mean reversion technique. Management also evaluates assumptions from independent third parties and these assumptions have a high degree of subjectivity. The mean reversion technique varies by macroeconomic variable and may vary by geographic location. As of March 31, 2020 , our reasonable and supportable forecast period ranged from 3 months – 1 year , after which, we revert to the 30-year or greater historical average over a period of up to 9 months and then continue at those averages through the contractual life of the loan. Commercial mortgage loans – Our allowance model for commercial mortgage loans is based on the characteristics of the loans in our portfolio, historical economic data and loss information, and current and forecasted economic conditions. Key loan characteristics affecting the estimate include, among others: time to maturity, delinquency status, loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, etc. Key macroeconomic variables include unemployment rates, rent growth, capitalization rates, and the housing price index. Management reviews and approves forecasted macroeconomic variables, along with the reasonable and supportable forecast period and mean reversion technique. Management also evaluates assumptions from independent third parties and these assumptions have a high degree of subjectivity. The mean reversion technique varies by macroeconomic variable and may vary by geographic location. As of March 31, 2020 , our reasonable and supportable forecast period ranged from 3 months – 2 years , after which, we revert to the 30-year or greater historical average over a period of up to 10 years. Related party other investments – The allowance model for the loans included in related party other investments derives an estimate based on historical loss data available for similarly rated unsecured corporate debt obligations, while also incorporating management’s expectations around prepayment. Credit Quality Indicators Residential mortgage loans – The underwriting process for our residential mortgage loans includes an evaluation of relevant credit information including past loan performance, credit scores, loan-to-value and other relevant information. Subsequent to purchase or origination, we closely monitor economic conditions and loan performance to manage and evaluate our exposure to credit risk in our residential mortgage loan portfolio. The primary credit quality indicator monitored for residential mortgage loans is loan performance. Nonperforming residential mortgage loans are 90 days or more past due and/or are in non-accrual status. The following represents our residential loan portfolio by origination year and performance status: March 31, 2020 (In millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Total Current (less than 30 days past due) $ 38 $ 998 $ 2,042 $ 547 $ 151 $ 9 $ 3,785 30 to 59 days past due — 47 36 32 15 1 131 60 to 89 days past due — 7 11 8 4 — 30 Over 90 days past due — 9 17 32 15 2 75 Total residential mortgages $ 38 $ 1,061 $ 2,106 $ 619 $ 185 $ 12 $ 4,021 As of December 31, 2019 , $67 million of our residential mortgage loans were nonperforming. The following represents our residential loan portfolio in non-accrual status: (In millions) March 31, 2020 Beginning amortized cost of residential mortgage loans in non-accrual status $ 67 Ending amortized cost of residential mortgage loans in non-accrual status 75 Amortized cost of residential mortgage loans in non-accrual status without a related allowance for credit losses 6 During the three months ended March 31, 2020 , we recognized $1 million of interest income on residential mortgage loans in non-accrual status. Commercial mortgage loans – The following represents our commercial mortgage loan portfolio by origination year and loan performance status: March 31, 2020 (In millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Total Current (less than 30 days past due) $ 1,103 $ 4,537 $ 2,846 $ 1,050 $ 160 $ 1,725 $ 11,421 As of December 31, 2019 , none of our commercial loans were 30 days or more past due. The following represents our commercial mortgage loan portfolio in non-accrual status: (In millions) March 31, 2020 Beginning amortized cost of commercial mortgage loans in non-accrual status $ — Ending amortized cost of commercial mortgage loans in non-accrual status 40 Amortized cost of commercial mortgage loans in non-accrual status without a related allowance for credit losses — During the three months ended March 31, 2020 , no interest income was recognized on commercial mortgage loans in non-accrual status. Loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios are measures we use to assess the risk and quality of commercial mortgage loans other than those under development. Loans under development are not evaluated using these ratios as the properties underlying these loans are generally not yet income-producing and the value of the underlying property significantly fluctuates based on the progress of construction. Therefore, the risk and quality of loans under development are evaluated based on the aging and geographical distribution of such loans as shown above. The loan-to-value ratio is expressed as a percentage of the amount of the loan relative to the value of the underlying property. A loan-to-value ratio in excess of 100% indicates the unpaid loan amount exceeds the value of the underlying collateral. Loan-to-value information is updated annually as part of the re-underwriting process supporting the NAIC risk based capital rating criteria. The following represents the loan-to-value ratio of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio, excluding those under development, by origination year: March 31, 2020 (In millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Total Less than 50% $ 149 $ 760 $ 207 $ 147 $ 74 $ 1,351 $ 2,688 50% to 60% 143 1,128 786 332 40 172 2,601 61% to 70% 441 2,023 1,481 476 46 108 4,575 71% to 80% 342 599 287 95 — 54 1,377 81% to 100% — — — — — 40 40 Commercial mortgage loans $ 1,075 $ 4,510 $ 2,761 $ 1,050 $ 160 $ 1,725 $ 11,281 The following represents the loan-to-value ratio of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio, excluding those under development, net of valuation allowances: (In millions) December 31, 2019 Less than 50% $ 2,640 50% to 60% 2,486 61% to 70% 4,093 71% to 80% 1,162 81% to 100% 31 Commercial mortgage loans $ 10,412 The debt service coverage ratio is expressed as a percentage of a property’s net operating income to its debt service payments. A debt service ratio of less than 1.0 indicates a property’s operations do not generate enough income to cover debt payments. Debt service coverage ratios are updated as more recent financial statements become available, at least annually or as frequently as quarterly in some cases. The following represents the debt service coverage ratio of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio, excluding those under development, by origination year: March 31, 2020 (In millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Total Greater than 1.20x $ 860 $ 3,661 $ 2,703 $ 974 $ 160 $ 1,599 $ 9,957 1.00x – 1.20x 149 849 58 53 — 114 1,223 Less than 1.00x 66 — — 23 — 12 101 Commercial mortgage loans $ 1,075 $ 4,510 $ 2,761 $ 1,050 $ 160 $ 1,725 $ 11,281 The following represents the debt service coverage ratio of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio, excluding those under development, net of valuation allowances: (In millions) December 31, 2019 Greater than 1.20x $ 9,212 1.00x – 1.20x 1,166 Less than 1.00x 34 Commercial mortgage loans $ 10,412 Investment Funds —Our investment fund portfolio consists of funds that employ various strategies and include investments in real estate, real assets, credit , equity and natural resources. Investment funds can meet the definition of VIEs. Our investment funds do not specify timing of distributions on the funds’ underlying assets. The following summarizes our investment funds, including related party: March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 (In millions, except for percentages) Carrying value Percent of total Carrying value Percent of total Investment funds Real estate $ 284 38.4 % $ 277 36.9 % Credit funds 122 16.5 % 153 20.4 % Private equity 244 33.0 % 236 31.5 % Real assets 89 12.0 % 83 11.1 % Natural resources 1 0.1 % 1 0.1 % Total investment funds 740 100.0 % 750 100.0 % Investment funds – related parties Differentiated investments MidCap FinCo Designated Activity Company (MidCap) 1 508 11.0 % 547 15.4 % AmeriHome Mortgage Company, LLC (AmeriHome) 1 508 11.0 % 487 13.7 % Catalina Holdings Ltd. (Catalina) 296 6.4 % 271 7.6 % Athora Holding Ltd. (Athora) 1 130 2.8 % 132 3.7 % Venerable Holdings, Inc. (Venerable) 1 110 2.4 % 99 2.8 % Other 281 6.1 % 222 6.3 % Total differentiated investments 1,833 39.7 % 1,758 49.5 % Real estate 775 16.7 % 853 24.0 % Credit funds 446 9.6 % 370 10.4 % Private equity 227 4.9 % 105 3.0 % Real assets 256 5.5 % 182 5.1 % Natural resources 200 4.3 % 163 4.6 % Public equities 44 1.0 % 119 3.4 % Investment in Apollo 1 850 18.3 % — — % Total investment funds – related parties 4,631 100.0 % 3,550 100.0 % Total investment funds including related party $ 5,371 $ 4,300 1 See further discussion on MidCap, AmeriHome, Athora, Venerable and our investment in Apollo in Note 9 – Related Parties. Non-Consolidated Securities and Investment Funds Fixed maturity securities – We invest in securitization entities as a debt holder or an investor in the residual interest of the securitization vehicle. These entities are deemed VIEs due to insufficient equity within the structure and lack of control by the equity investors over the activities that significantly impact the economics of the entity. In general, we are a debt investor within these entities and, as such, hold a variable interest; however, due to the debt holders’ lack of ability to control the decisions within the trust that significantly impact the entity, and the fact the debt holders are protected from losses due to the subordination of the equity tranche, the debt holders are not deemed the primary beneficiary. Securitization vehicles in which we hold the residual tranche are not consolidated because we do not unilaterally have substantive rights to remove the general partner, or when assessing related party interests, we are not under common control, as defined by GAAP, with the related party, nor are substantially all of the activities conducted on our behalf; therefore, we are not deemed the primary beneficiary. Debt investments and investments in the residual tranche of securitization entities are considered debt instruments and are held at fair value on the balance sheet and classified as AFS or trading. Investment funds – Investment funds include non-fixed income, alternative investments in the form of limited partnerships or similar legal structures. Equity securities – We invest in preferred equity securities issued by entities deemed to be VIEs due to insufficient equity within the structure. Our risk of loss associated with our non-consolidated investments depends on the investment. Investment funds, equity securities and trading securities are limited to the carrying value plus unfunded commitments. AFS securities are limited to amortized cost plus unfunded commitments. The following summarizes the carrying value and maximum loss exposure of these non-consolidated investments: March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 (In millions) Carrying Value Maximum Loss Exposure Carrying Value Maximum Loss Exposure Investment funds $ 740 $ 1,232 $ 750 $ 1,265 Investment in related parties – investment funds 4,631 6,724 3,550 5,955 Investment in fixed maturity securities 20,380 22,548 22,694 22,170 Investment in related parties – fixed maturity securities 4,245 5,177 4,570 4,878 Investment in related parties – equity securities 49 49 58 58 Total non-consolidated investments $ 30,045 $ 35,730 $ 31,622 $ 34,326 |