Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606. This Update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The guidance in this Update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to illustrate the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance also includes a cohesive set of disclosure requirements that will provide users of financial statements with comprehensive information about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a reporting organization’s contracts with customers. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016 for public companies and 2017 for non-public entities. Management is evaluating the effect, if any, on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
On February 8, 2012, the Company obtained exclusive licensing rights of the QI System from Quadra International Inc. (“Quadra”), the manufacturer of the QI System, to sub-license, establish joint ventures to commercialize, use and process organic waste, and sell related by-products in the states of Johore and Selangor, Malaysia for a period of 25 years. The QI System processes organic waste to marketable by-products and is proprietary technology. This business was terminated on November 15, 2015.The Company has excluded results of QI system operations from its continuing operations to present this business in discontinued operations.
The following table shows the results of operations for years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 which are included in the loss from discontinued operations:
NOTE 5-RESTRICTED CASH
Restricted cash represented deposits in certain banks as collateral for bank acceptance bills (See Note 7). As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s restricted cash had balance of $194,836 and nil respectively.
NOTE 6-INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined using the weighted average cost) or market value and consist of the following:
| | As of June 30, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Work-in-process | | $ | 248,154 | | | $ | - | |
Packaging materials | | | 300 | | | | - | |
| | $ | 248,454 | | | $ | - | |
NOTE 7-BANK ACCEPTANCE BILLS
The Company obtained bank acceptance bills from two banks which are due between November 20, 2016 and December 6, 2016. The bank acceptance bills were collateralized by cash deposits in the banks (see Note 5).
NOTE 8 - DUE TO RELATED PARTIES
Due to related parties represents certain advances to the Company or its subsidiaries by related parties. The amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.
On November 19, 2015, the Company received a letter of forgiveness from Magnum Group International Inc. (“Magnum”), a shareholder of the Company, whereby an aggregate amount of $184,085 which was the balance of due to Magnum as of November 19, 2015 was forgiven. The amount was recorded as additional paid in capital.
During the year ended June 30, 2016, Ben Wong (the controlling shareholder of Shinning Glory which holds shares in Ionix Technology, Inc.) advanced $15,771 to the Company, $37,740 to Well Best and $165,882 (RMB 1,100,000) to Taizhou Ionix.
During the year ended on June 30, 2016, Mr. Li, the General Manager and director of Taizhou Ionix, made advances to Taizhou Ionix for $307,644 (RMB 2,040,050).
On December 31, 2015, Taizhou Ionix entered into an agreement with Taizhou Jiunuojie Electronic Technology Ltd. (“Taizhou Jiunuojie”) whose major shareholder is Mr.Guo’en Li, a director of Taizhou Ionix. Based on the agreement, Taizhou Jiunuojie will manufacture Lithium-ion battery for Taizhou Ionix at a cost of RMB1.1 per unit (approximately $0.17). Taizhou Ionix also purchased raw materials from Taizhou Jiunuojie. The total cost of raw material purchased from Taizhou Jiunuojie and manufacturing cost incurred was $720,078 for the year ended June 30, 2016.
Taizhou Ionix leased office and warehouse space from Taizhou Jiunuojie. The lease term is from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 with annual rent of RMB12,000 (approximately $1,900). The Company recorded rental expense of $679 for the year ended June 30, 2016.
Total balance owed to Taizhou Jiunuojie (including accruals) as of June 30, 2016 was $528,720 (RMB 3,506,047)
During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company borrowed $75,401 (RMB 500,000) from its president, director and chief executive officer, Ms. Doris Zhou.
NOTE 9 – CONCENTRATION OF RISKS
Major customers
For the year ended June 30, 2016, customer who accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues and its outstanding balance as of June 30, 2016 are presented as follows:
| | Revenue | | | Percentage of revenue | | | Accounts receivable | | | Percentage of accounts receivable | |
| | | | | | | | |
Customer A | | $ | 1,480,073 | | | | 75 | % | | $ | 1,267,274 | | | | 86 | % |
Customer B | | | 368,162 | | | | 19 | % | | | 214,221 | | | | 14 | % |
Total | | $ | 1,848,235 | | | $ | 94 | % | | $ | 1,481,495 | | | | 100 | % |
All customers are located in the PRC.
Major suppliers
Supplier who accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s total purchases (materials and services) and its outstanding balance as of June 30, 2016, are presented as follows:
| Total Purchase | | Percentage of total purchase | | Accounts payable/Due to related parties | | Percentage of accounts payable | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplier A-related party | | $ | 720,078 | | | | 34 | % | | $ | 528,720 | | | | N/A | |
Supplier B | | | 452,807 | | | | 22 | % | | | 416,810 | | | | 54 | % |
Total | | $ | 1,172,885 | | | | 56 | % | | $ | 945,530 | | | | 54 | % |
All suppliers of the Company are located in the PRC.
NOTE 10- INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate in the years presented is the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rate. The Company operates in various countries: United States of America Hong Kong and the PRC that are subject to taxes in the jurisdictions in which they operate.
United States of America
The Company is registered in the State of Nevada and is subject to the tax laws of United States of America.
The Company has shown losses since inception. As a result it has incurred no income tax. Under normal circumstances, the Internal Revenue Service is authorized to audit income tax returns during a three year period after the returns are filed. In unusual circumstances, the period may be longer. Tax returns for the years ended June 30, 2011 to 2014 were still exposed to audit as of June 30, 2016.
The Company received a penalty assessment from the IRS in the amount of $10,000 for failure to provide information with respect to certain foreign owned US Corporations on Form 5472 - Information Return of a 25% Foreign Owned US Corporation for the tax period ended June 30, 2013. The Company disputed this claim and is working to reverse the penalty. The Company believes that the payment of this penalty is remote and did not accrue this liability as of June 30, 2016 and 2015.
Hong Kong
The Well Best is registered in Hong Kong and for the year ended June 30, 2016, there is no assessable income chargeable to profit tax in Hong Kong.
The PRC
The Company’s Chinese subsidiaries are subject to the Corporate Income Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China at a unified income tax rate of 25%.
The reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) at the U.S. statutory rate of 35% to the Company's effective tax provision is as follows:
| | For the year ended June 30, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| | | | | | |
U.S. Statutory rate | | $ | (13,746 | ) | | $ | (40,699 | ) |
Tax rate difference between China and U.S. | | | 4,046 | | | | - | |
Change in Valuation Allowance | | | 12,569 | | | | 40,699 | |
Expiration of net loss carryforward | | | 2,289 | | | | - | |
Effective tax provision | | $ | 5,158 | | | $ | - | |
The provisions for income taxes are summarized as follows:
| | For the year ended June 30, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Current | | $ | 28,008 | | | $ | - | |
Deferred | | | (22,850 | ) | | | - | |
Total | | $ | 5,158 | | | $ | - | |
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax assets are as follows:
| | As of June 30, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Net operating loss carryforward | | $ | 12,569 | | | $ | 66,665 | |
Bad debt provision | | | 18,731 | | | | - | |
Others | | | 4,119 | | | | - | |
| | | 35,419 | | | | 66,665 | |
Less valuation allowance | | | (12,569 | ) | | | (66,665 | ) |
Deferred tax assets | | $ | 22,850 | | | $ | - | |
Net operation loss carryforwards are subject to limitation due to any ownership change (as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) which resulted in a change in business direction.
On November 20, 2015, the Company’s former majority shareholder and chief executive officer, Locksley Samuels, sold his entire 21,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Shining Glory Investments Limited which represented 65.45% of common stock outstanding and resigned from all positions with the Company. The Company terminated the business related to QI system and has shifted its focus to develop and sell lithium batteries. (see Note 1 and Note 4)
Due to change of control and change of business activities, net loss carryforward of approximately $197,000 which was generated during the period before the termination of business related to QI system were expired.
The Company has not provided deferred taxes on unremitted earnings attributable to international companies that have been considered to be reinvested indefinitely. Because of the availability of U.S. foreign tax credits, it is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested. In accordance with ASC Topic 740, interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits is classified as income tax and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of operations.
The extent of the Company’s operations involves dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state and international tax audits. The Company recognizes potential liabilities and records tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due.
NOTE 11 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
On November 30, 2015, the Company executed a 3:1 forward stock split. All relevant information relating to number of shares and per share information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this forward split for all period presented.
On August 7, 2014, the shareholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws to change the number of the authorized capital of common stock from Two Hundred Million (200,000,000) to One Hundred Ninety Five Million (195,000,000), par value of $ 0.0001. The shareholders also approved the establishment of a Preferred Stock class with an authorized capital of Five Million (5,000,000), par value of $ 0.0001.
On November 19, 2015, the Company received a letter of forgiveness from Magnum Group International Inc. (“Magnum”), a shareholder of the Company, whereby an aggregate amount of $184,085 which was the balance of due to Magnum as of November 19, 2015 was forgiven. The amount was recorded as additional paid in capital.
On February 17, 2016, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with the Company’s major shareholder to sell 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock for $50,000 at $0.01 per share. No commissions were paid to any broker or third party for this transaction. The preferred shares are not entitled to any conversion rights, and ranks junior to holders of common stock to all indebtedness of the Company.
NOTE 12– SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On August 19, 2016, Well Best, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a share transfer agreement (the “Share Transfer Agreement”) whereby Well Best sold 100% of its equity interest in Taizhou Ionix, to Mr. GuoEn Li, the sole director and officer of Taizhou for 30,000 RMB (4,525 US$) (the “Sale”). Well Best was the sole shareholder of Taizhou. The Board approved and authorized the Sale, and instructed Well Best to enter into and execute the Share Transfer Agreement due to the fact that the Company believed that Taizhou’s manufacturing contract with Taizhou Jiunuojie Electronic Technology Limited to produce lithium batteries was not beneficial to the Company. As a result of the Sale, (i) Taizhou is no longer an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and (ii) Mr. Li is no longer affiliated with the Company. The Share Transfer Agreement was filed as exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 24, 2016.
NOTE 13– RESTATEMENT
The management of the Company has concluded that we should restate our financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2015. The conclusion was reached by management because they determined that (1) impairment of intangible assets was not properly valued as of June 30, 2015, (2) the license fee receivable and deferred revenue were improperly recorded as of June 30, 2015.
The effect of the restatement on specific line items in the financial statements as of June 30, 2015 and for the year ended June 30, 2015 is set forth in the table below:
| Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2015 | |
| Previously | | | | | |
| Reported | | Adjustments | | As Adjusted | |
| | | | | | |
License fee receivable | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | (60,000 | ) | | $ | - | |
Total current assets | | $ | 60,691 | | | $ | (60,000 | ) | | $ | 691 | |
Intangible asset | | $ | 54,475 | | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | - | |
Total other assets | | $ | 54,475 | | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | - | |
Deferred revenue | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | (60,000 | ) | | $ | - | |
Total current liabilities | | $ | 237,602 | | | $ | (60,000 | ) | | $ | 177,602 | |
Accumulated deficit | | $ | (135,997 | ) | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | (190,472 | ) |
Total stockholders’ deficit | | $ | (122,436 | ) | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | (176,911 | ) |
| Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss | |
| for the Year Ended June 30, 2015 | |
| Previously | | | | | |
| Reported | | Adjustments | | As Adjusted | |
| | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | $ | 61,807 | | | $ | 54,475 | | | $ | 116,282 | |
Loss before income tax | | $ | (61,807 | ) | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | (116,282 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (61,807 | ) | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | (116,282 | ) |
| Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | |
| for the Year Ended June 30, 2015 | |
| Previously | | | | | |
| Reported | | Adjustments | | As Adjusted | |
| | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (61,807 | ) | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | (116,282 | ) |
Total stockholders' deficit | | $ | (122,436 | ) | | $ | (54,475 | ) | | $ | (176,911 | ) |
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
On July 18, 2016, the Company (“Registrant”) dismissed Michael F. Albanese, CPA (“Albanese”) as its independent registered public accounting firm. The decision was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.
The reports of Albanese on the Registrant’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, and 2014, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the Registrant’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, and 2014, and the subsequent period through the date of this report, there were (i) no disagreements with Albanese on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Albanese would have caused Albanese to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report, and (ii) no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
On July 18, 2016, the Registrant engaged Paritz & Company, P.A. (“P&C”) as the Registrant’s new independent registered public accounting firm. The appointment of P&C was approved by the Registrant’s Board of Directors effective July 18, 2016.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, and 2014, and the subsequent interim period through July 18, 2016, neither the Registrant nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with P&C regarding either (1) the application of accounting principles to any specific completed or proposed transaction, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Registrant’s financial statements, nor did P&C provide written or oral advice to the Registrant that P&C concluded was an important factor considered by the Registrant in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (2) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
The Registrant provided Albanese with a copy of the disclosures made in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 18, 2016 and requested that Albanese furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not he agrees with the Registrant’s statements contained therein. Albanese reviewed the disclosures made in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2016, and a copy of the letter furnished by Albanese was furnished as Exhibit 16.1 to the 8-K, and is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
As of June 30, 2016, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2016.
During the year ended June 30, 2016, management identified the following weaknesses, which were deemed to be material weaknesses in internal controls:
1. Due to the size of the Company and available resources, there are limited personnel to assist with the accounting and financial reporting function, which results in a lack of segregation of duties.
2. As part of our year end procedures, we identified and recorded a complete impairment of our intangible assets. As a result, management deemed the controls around the review and identification of such matters to be inadequate.
3. Audit Committee – As of June 30, 2016, our Board of Directors has not established an Audit Committee or adopted an Audit Committee Charter.
4. We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at June 30, 2016, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company's data or off-site storage of data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.
Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 308(b), this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their cost.
Changes in Internal Control and Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, which were identified in connection with our management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. | Other Information |
None.
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
Identification of Directors and Executive Officers and Term of Office
The following table sets forth the names and ages of our current directors and executive officers. Our Board of Directors appoints our executive officers. Each director of the Company serves for a term of one year or until the successor is elected at the Company's annual shareholders' meeting and is qualified, subject to removal by the Company's shareholders. Each officer serves, at the pleasure of the Board of Directors, for a term of one year and until the successor is elected at the annual meeting of the Board of Directors and is qualified. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers. None of our directors or officers has been affiliated with any company that has filed for bankruptcy within the last five years. The Company is not aware of any proceedings to which any of the Company’s officers or directors, or any associate of any such officer or director, is a party adverse to the Company or any of the Company’s subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to it or any of its subsidiaries.
Name | Age | | Position | Date of Appointment |
Doris Zhou | 34 | | Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director. | November 20, 2015 |
Yue Kou | 42 | | Chief Financial Officer | May 27, 2016 |
Well Best International Investment Limited
The following table sets forth the names and ages of Well Best’s directors and executive officers as of June 30, 2016.
Name | Age | | Position | Date of Appointment |
Qingchun Yang | 53 | | President and Director | February 17, 2016 |
Xinyu Ionix Technology Company Limited
The following table sets forth the names and ages of Xinyu Ionix’s directors and executive officers as of June 30, 2016.
Name | Age | | Position | Date of Appointment |
Zhengfu Nan | 23 | | President and Director | August 19, 2016 |
Taizhou Ionix Technology Company Limited
The following table sets forth the names and ages of Taizhou Ionix’s directors and executive officers as of June 30, 2016. The board of directors of Well Best and majority shareholders authorized and effected the sale of Taizhou Ionix on August19, 2016 to Guo’En Li. As of the date of this annual report, Taizhou is no longer a wholly owned subsidiary of Well Best.
Name | Age | | Position | Date of Appointment |
Guo’En Li | 51 | | President and Director | May 27, 2016 |
Background and Business Experience
The business experience during the past five years of the person presently listed above as an Officer or Director of the Company is as follows:
Doris Zhou- Ms. Zhou earned a Bachelor’s degree in International Finance from Shenyang University in 2005. She has worked as an assistant and served as deputy general manager to the general manager of Dalian Great Wall Trade Co., Ltd. from 2007 – 2010, gaining experience with investor inquiries, investment contracts, and investor relations. Since 2010, Ms. Zhou has been an investment advisor and private equity investor in several private companies located in China, as well as managing other private equity funds.
Yue Kou- Ms. Kou is a member of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, and the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Ms. Kou has 20 years of solid experience in statutory auditing, international accounting, and publicly listed companies. Ms. Kou started her career as Chief Accountant (1996-1999) with Xinmao Tech Holding Limited, a company in China. From 1999-2002, she was employed as a staff accountant in the Ernst & Young, Beijing Branch focusing on external audit and international accounting conversions. From 2002-2006, she worked as an account manager with China Data Broadcasting Holding Ltd, a publicly listed company on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. From 2006 to present, Ms. Kou worked as an auditor and financial controller for three different audit firms: (i) Zhongyi(HK)CPA Limited, (ii) Thomas Lee and Partners, and (iii) GDT CPA Limited.
Qingchun Yang- Qingchun Yang was born in Dalian, Liaoning Province. Mr. Yang majored in Economic Management and graduated as an Economist in 1987. From 2007 to 2011, Mr. Yang worked as the senior executive in Dalian Huanyu Venture Capital Co. where he was involved in wealth management experiences and high ability of resources integration. In 2012, Mr. Yang co-founded Jiamusi Huanqiu New Energy Company Limited, where he was in charge of drafting strategic plans and operating plan of the company, including the overall human recourse strategy plan, which is suitable for the short-term and long-term development of companies.
Zhengfu Nan- Mr. Nan graduated from Jiangxi Vocational College of Mechanical &Electrical Technology. From 2011-2016, Mr. Nan worked as the technical specialist at Jiangxi Yichun Battery Factory, and then as the legal representative of Xinyu Ionix. Mr. Nan is in charge of the technical management of the Company.
Guo’En Li- Mr. Li graduated from Qinling Aero Electric Co. Ltd., a vocational school located in Xingping City, Shaanxi Province in 1987. From 1987-1993, Mr. Li worked as a technician for Xingping City Aero Electric Co. Ltd. in Shaanxi Province. From 1994-1995, Mr. Li worked as a technician in Le Ting Electric Wire Co. Ltd of the Hong Kong Jinshan Group. From1995-1997, Mr. Li worked as an engineer in the Huizhou Xianjin battery factory of the Hong Kong Jinshan Group. From 1997-2000, Mr. Li worked as a battery R&D engineer in the engineering department of the Shenzhen Biyadi Holding Co. Ltd, a Hong Kong company. From 2001-2006, Mr. Li worked as a manager in the engineering department in the Henan Huanyu Group, and as the general manager of Henan Huatai Electromechanical Facilities Co. Ltd. From 2006-Oct. 2010, Mr. Li worked as a managing director and general manager of Zhangjianggang Jiunuojie Electromechanical Facilities Co. Ltd. From 2011- 2014, Mr. Li worked as a managing director and as the Vice CEO of Taizhou Jiunuojie Electronic Tech Co. Ltd. From 2014-present day, Mr. Li serves as the CEO and general manager of Taizhou Jiunuojie Electronic Tech Co. Ltd.
Committees
We do not have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors acts in such capacities. We believe that our members of our board of directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our company does not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors.
Identification of Significant Employees
We have no significant employees other than our officers and directors.
Family Relationship
We currently do not have any officers or directors of our Company who are related to each other.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
The Board of Directors has not established a nominating committee. The Board is of the opinion that such committee is not necessary since the Company has only two directors, and to date, such directors have been performing the functions of such committee. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation and nominations. We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executive officers or directors.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
During the past ten years no director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Company has been involved in the following:
| (1) | A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law which was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing; |
| (2) | Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); |
| (3) | Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities: |
i. Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;
ii. Engaging in any type of business practice; or
iii. Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;
| (4) | Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; |
| (5) | Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated; |
| (6) | Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated; |
| (7) | Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: |
i. Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or
ii. Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or
iii. Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or
| (8) | Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. |
Code of Ethics
The Company has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers, principal financial officers, principal accounting officers or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We anticipate that we will adopt a code of ethics when we increase the number of our directors and officers, or the number of employees.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of change in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) during the year ended June 30, 2016, Forms 5 and any amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the year ended June 30, 2016, and the representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe that during the year ended June 30, 2016, our executive officers and directors and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our executive officers, and those of Well Best and its subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Unless otherwise specified, the term of each executive officer is that as set forth under that section entitled, “Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons -- Term of Office”.
Name and Principal Position | Year Ended June 30, | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensati on ($) | Total ($) |
Doris Zhou(1) Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director | 2015 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
2016 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Yue Kou(2) Chief Financial Officer | 2015 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
2016 | 14,400 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 14,400 |
Locksley Samuels(3) Former President, CEO, CFO, Director | 2015 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
2016 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Qingchun Yang(4) Director of Well Best | 2015 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
2016 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Zhengfu Nan(5) Director of XinyuIonix | 2015 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
2016 | 5,400 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 5,400 |
Guo-En Li(6) Director of Taizhou Ionix | 2015 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
2016 | 9,000 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 9,000 |
Notes to Summary Compensation Table:
(1) Ms. Zhou was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and a Director on November 20, 2015. Ms. Zhou’s salary is Nil at this time.
(2) Ms. Kou was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company on May 27, 2016. Ms. Kou’s salary is $14,400 USD (equals to 95,990 RMB).
(1) Mr. Samuels resigned from his positions as the Company’s sole director, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer, effective as of November 20, 2015.
(2) Mr. Yang was appointed as a director of Well Best, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, on February 17, 2016. His annual salary package is $0.
(3) Zhengfu Nan was appointed as director of XinyuIonix Technology Company Limited, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, on August 19, 2016. His annual salary package is $5,400(equals to RMB36,000).
(4) Guo-En Li was appointed as a director of Taizhou Ionix on May 27, 2016. On August 19, 2016, Well Best and majority shareholder authorized and effected the sale of Taizhou Ionix to Guo’En Li. As of the date of this annual report, Taizhou is no longer a wholly owned subsidiary of Well Best and thus Guo-En Li is also no longer affiliated with the Company.
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, none of Ionix Technology, Well Best or its subsidiaries, had any compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from Ionix, Well Best or its subsidiaries with respect to any executive officer, that would result in payments to such person because of his or her resignation, retirement or other termination of employment with the Company, Well Best, or its subsidiaries, any change in control, or a change in the person’s responsibilities following a change in control of the Company, Well Best, or its subsidiaries.
Outstanding Equity Awards
There are no equity awards outstanding as of the year ended June 30, 2016 for Ionix Technology, Well Best or its subsidiaries.
Stock Options/SAR Grants
During our fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 there were no options granted to our named officers or directors.
Option Exercises
During our Fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 there were no options exercised by our named officers.
Compensation of Directors
As of June 30, 2016, there is no cash compensation paid to directors for their service on our board of directors. We do not have any agreements for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase shares of our common stock as awarded by our board of directors.
We have determined that none of our directors are independent directors, as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv)(B) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans
There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directors or a committee thereof.
Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers and Other Management
None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our company during the last two fiscal years, is or has been indebted to our company by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.
Employment Agreements
The Company has no agreement that provides for payment to executive officers at, following, or in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination, or a change in control of Company or a change in any executive officer's responsibilities following a change in control.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table lists, as of June 30, 2016, the number of shares of common stock that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of the Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using “beneficial ownership” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner, Directors and Officers: | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percentage of Beneficial Ownership (1) |
Doris Zhou (2) 3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 500S Las Vegas, NV 89169 | 0 | 0% |
Yue Kou(3) 3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 500S Las Vegas, NV 89169 | 0 | 0.0% |
Qingchun Yang(4) 3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 500S Las Vegas, NV 89169 | 0 | 0.0% |
Zhengfu Nan(5) 3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 500S Las Vegas, NV 89169 | 0 | 0.0% |
Guo-En Li(6) 3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 500S Las Vegas, NV 89169 | 0 | 0.0% |
All executive officers and directors as a group (5 people) | 0 | 0.0% |
| | |
Beneficial Shareholders greater than 5% | | |
Shining Glory Investments Limited(7) 3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 500S Las Vegas, NV 89169 | 64,800,000 | 65.45% |
(1) Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 99,003,000 shares of common stock outstanding on June 30, 2016. Percentage ownership is determined based on shares owned together with securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of June 30, 2016, for each stockholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 39, 2016, are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Our common stock is our only issued and outstanding class of securities eligible to vote.
(2) Doris Zhou is the CEO, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director of Ionix Technology. Ms. Zhou’s beneficial ownership includes 0 shares of common stock and 0 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(3) Yue Kou is the CFO of Ionix Technology. Ms. Kou’s beneficial ownership includes 0 shares of common stock and 0 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(4)Qingchun Yang is the President and Director of Well Best, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ionix Technology. Mr. Yang’s beneficial ownership includes 0 shares of common stock of the Company and 0 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(5)Zhengfu Nan is the President and Director of XinyuIonix, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Ionix Technology. Mr. Nan’s beneficial ownership includes 0 shares of common stock of the Company and 0 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(6)Guo’En Li is the former President and Director of Taizhou Ionix, a former indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Ionix Technology. Mr. Li’s beneficial ownership includes 0 shares of common stock of the Company and 0 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
(7) Shining Glory Investments Limited is the beneficial owner of 64,800,000 shares of common stock of the Company and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Ben Wong is the sole officer and director of Shining Glory Investments Limited
Changes in Control
There are no present arrangements or pledges of the Company’s securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Director Independence
For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set out in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2). The OTCBB on which our shares of common stock are quoted does not have any director independence requirements. The NASDAQ definition of “Independent Director” means a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company's Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
According to the NASDAQ definition, Doris Zhou is not independent director because she is also an executive officer of the Company. According to the NASDAQ the Company does not have any independent directors.
We do not have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors acts in such capacities. We believe that our members of our board of directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our company does not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.
Related Party Transactions
Due to related parties represents certain advances to the Company or its subsidiaries by related parties. The amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.
On November 19, 2015, the Company received a letter of forgiveness from Magnum Group International Inc. (“Magnum”), a shareholder of the Company, whereby an aggregate amount of $184,085 which was the balance of due to Magnum as of November 19, 2015 was forgiven. The amount was recorded as additional paid in capital.
During the year ended June 30, 2016, Ben Wong (the controlling shareholder of Shinning Glory which holds shares in Ionix Technology, Inc.) advanced $15,771 to the Company, $37,740 to Well Best and $165,882 (RMB 1,100,000) to Taizhou Ionix.
During the year ended on June 30, 2016, Mr. Li, the General Manager and director of Taizhou Ionix, made advances to Taizhou Ionix for $307,644 (RMB 2,040,050).
On December 31, 2015, Taizhou Ionix entered into an agreement with Taizhou Jiunuojie Electronic Technology Ltd. (“Taizhou Jiunuojie”) whose major shareholder is Mr.Guo’en Li, a director of Taizhou Ionix. Based on the agreement, Taizhou Jiunuojie will manufacture Lithium-ion battery for Taizhou Ionix at a cost of RMB1.1 per unit (approximately $0.17). Taizhou Ionix also purchased raw materials from Taizhou Jiunuojie. The total cost of raw material purchased from Taizhou Jiunuojie and manufacturing cost incurred was $720,078 for the year ended June 30, 2016.
Taizhou Ionix leased office and warehouse space from Taizhou Jiunuojie. The lease term is from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 with annual rent of RMB12,000 (approximately $1,900).
Total balance owed to Taizhou Jiunuojie (including accruals) as of June 30, 2016 was $528,720 (RMB 3,506,047)
During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company borrowed $75,401 (RMB 500,000) from its president, director and chief executive officer, Ms. Doris Zhou.
Other than the foregoing, none of the directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any person who owned of record or was known to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of its Common Stock, nor any associate or affiliate of such persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect the Company.
With regard to any future related party transaction, we plan to fully disclose any and all related party transactions in the following manner:
| · | Disclosing such transactions in reports where required; |
| · | Disclosing in any and all filings with the SEC, where required; |
| · | Obtaining disinterested directors consent; and |
| · | Obtaining shareholder consent where required. |
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
On July 18, 2016, the Company appointed Paritz & Company, P.A. as the Company’s registered independent public accounting firm. Our principal independent accountant during the year ended June 30, 2015 was Michael F. Albanese, CPA. Their pre-approved fees billed to the Company are set forth below:
| | For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 | | | For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 | |
Audit Fees | | $ | 17,500 | | | $ | 16,500 | |
Audit-related fees | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,700 | |
Tax Fees | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
All other Fees | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Total | | $ | 17,500 | | | $ | 19,200 | |
Audit Fees
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, we incurred approximately $17,500 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, we incurred approximately $19,200 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
Audit-Related Fees
The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 for assurance and related services by our principal independent accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements (and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule 14A) was $NIL and $2,700, respectively.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 for professional services rendered by our principal accountant tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $NIL and $NIL, respectively.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 for products and services provided by our principal independent accountants (other than the services reported in Items 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A) was $NIL and $NIL, respectively.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Exhibit | | | |
Number | Description of Exhibit | | |
3.01a | Articles of Incorporation, dated March 11, 2011 | | Filed with the SEC on August 23, 2011 as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form 10. |
3.01b | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated August 7, 2014 | | Filed with the SEC on September 3, 2014 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.01c | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated December 3, 2015 | | Filed with the SEC on December 10, 2015 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.02a | Bylaws | | Filed with the SEC on August 23, 2011 as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form 10. |
3.02b | Amended Bylaws, dated August 7, 2014 | | Filed with the SEC on September 3, 2014 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.01 | Stock Purchase Agreement between Locksley Samuels and Shining Glory Investments Limited, dated November 20, 2015 | | Filed with the SEC on November 23, 2015 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.02 | Manufacturing Agreement, dated as of August 19, 2016, by and between Jiangxi Huanming Technology Limited Company and Xinyu Ionix Technology Company Limited. | | Filed with the SEC on August 24, 2016 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.03 | Share Transfer Agreement, dated as of August 19, 2016, by and between GuoEn Li and Well Best International Investment Limited | | Filed with the SEC on August 24, 2016 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K |
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | | Filed herewith. |
31.01 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 | | Filed herewith. |
31.02 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 | | Filed herewith. |
32.01 | CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | | Filed herewith. |
32.02 | CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | | Filed herewith. |
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document | | Filed herewith. |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | Filed herewith. |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | Filed herewith. |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document | | Filed herewith. |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | Filed herewith. |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | Filed herewith. |
*Pursuant to Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Ionix Technology, Inc. |
| |
Date: October 11, 2016 | By: | /s/ Doris Zhou | |
| Name: Doris Zhou Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Date: October 11, 2016 | By: | /s/ Yue Kou | |
| Name: Yue Kou Title: Chief Financial Officer |
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Ionix Technology, Inc. |
| |
Date: October 11, 2016 | By: | /s/ Doris Zhou | |
| Name: Doris Zhou Title: Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
Date: October 11, 2016 | By: | /s/ Yue Kou | |
| Name: Yue Kou Title: Chief Financial Officer |