Corindus Vascular Robotics (CVRS) 10-K 30 Jun 14 2014 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Jun. 23, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Document And Entity Information	'	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'YOUR INTERNET DEFENDER, INC.	'	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001528557	'	'
Document Type	'10-K	'	'
Document Period End Date	31-Mar-14	'	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--03-31	'	'
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	'No	'	'
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	'No	'	'
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	'Yes	'	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'	'
Entity Public Float	'	'	$0
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	52,000,000	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'FY	'	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'	'

Balance_Sheets

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
CURRENT ASSETS:	'	'
Cash	$87	'
Accounts receivable	700	40,656
Prepaid Expense	'	312
Total Current Assets	787	40,968
OTHER ASSETS:	'	'
Website development costs, net	3,047	12,031
Security Deposit	325	325
Total Other Assets	3,372	12,356
Total Assets	4,159	53,324
CURRENT LIABILITIES:	'	'
Bank Overdraft	'	3,636
Note payable	46,800	43,500
Note payable - related party	93,182	'
Accounts payable	'	3,555
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	235,718	117,095
Total Current Liabilities	375,700	167,786
Total Liabilities	375,700	167,786
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:	'	'
Preferred stock par value $0.0001: 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	'	'
Common stock par value $0.0001: 150,000,000 shares authorized; 52,000,000 shares issued and outstanding	5,200	5,200
Additional paid in capital	132,440	122,040
Accumulated deficit	-509,181	-241,702
Total Stockholders' Deficit	-371,541	-114,462
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$4,159	$53,324

Balance_Sheets_Parenthetical

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	'	'
Preferred stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred stock, authorized	1,000,000	1,000,000
Preferred stock, issued	0	0
Preferred stock, outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, authorized	150,000,000	150,000,000
Common stock, issued	52,000,000	52,000,000
Common stock, outstanding	52,000,000	52,000,000

Statements_of_Operations

Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Statements Of Operations	'	'
Net revenues earned during the development stage	$35,973	$175,787
Cost of revenues	57,682	212,365
Gross Margin	-21,709	-36,578
Operating expenses	'	'
Compensation expense	10,400	10,400
Consulting fees - related party	144,000	48,000
General and administrative	73,800	91,693
Total operating expenses	228,200	150,093
Loss from operations	-249,909	-186,671
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:	'	'
Interest expense	17,570	3,167
Other (income) expense, net	17,570	3,167
Loss before income tax provision	-267,479	-189,838
Income tax provision	'	'
Net loss	($267,479)	($189,838)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	($0.01)	$0
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted	52,000,000	52,000,000

Statement_of_Stockholders_Defi

Statement of Stockholders' Deficit (USD $)	Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Total
Beginning Balance, Amount at Mar. 31, 2012	$5,200	$111,640	($51,864)	$64,976
Beginning Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2012	52,000,000	'	'	'
Non cash compensation	'	10,400	'	10,400
Net loss	'	'	-189,838	-189,838
Ending Balance, Amount at Mar. 31, 2013	5,200	122,040	-241,702	-114,462
Ending Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2013	52,000,000	'	'	'
Non cash compensation	'	10,400	'	10,400
Net loss	'	'	-267,479	-267,479
Ending Balance, Amount at Mar. 31, 2014	$5,200	$132,440	($509,181)	($371,541)
Ending Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2014	52,000,000	'	'	'

Statements_of_Cash_Flows

Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:	'	'
Net loss	($267,479)	($189,838)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities	'	'
Amortization	8,984	8,984
In-kind compensation	10,400	10,400
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	'	'
Accounts receivable	39,956	-24,787
Prepaid expenses	312	-312
Security deposit	'	'
Bank overdraft	-3,636	3,636
Accounts payable	-3,555	1,655
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	118,623	98,162
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	-96,395	-92,100
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:	'	'
Website development costs	'	'
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	'	'
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:	'	'
Proceeds from sale of common stock	'	'
Proceeds from notes payable	3,300	46,000
Proceeds from notes payable-related party	106,564	'
Repayments to notes payable	'	-2,500
Repayments to notes payable-related party	-13,382	'
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	96,482	43,500
NET CHANGE IN CASH	87	-48,600
Cash at beginning of period	'	48,600
Cash at end of period	87	'
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:	'	'
Interest paid	'	1,967
Income tax paid	'	'

Organization_and_Operations

Organization and Operations	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 1 - Organization and Operations	'
	Your Internet Defender, Inc.
	Your Internet Defender, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on May 4, 2011 under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company originally intended to engage in online brand management, focusing on offsite search engine optimization (SEO), social media reputation monitoring, and specialized brand reputation marketing. The Company intend to develop a full range of services, proprietary methodology and systems that will assist companies, professionals and individuals to protect and promote their brands in the most favorable manner, while attracting traffic to their desired web locations.

Summary_of_Significant_Account

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
	The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
	Basis of Presentation
	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
	Fiscal Year-End
	The Company elected March 31st as its fiscal year ending date.
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reporting amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimate(s) and assumption(s) affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include website development costs, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. When long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	The key assumptions used in management’s estimates of projected cash flow deal largely with forecasts of sales levels, gross margins, and operating costs of the manufacturing facilities. These forecasts are typically based on historical trends and take into account recent developments as well as management’s plans and intentions. Any difficulty in manufacturing or sourcing raw materials on a cost effective basis would significantly impact the projected future cash flows of the Company’s manufacturing facilities and potentially lead to an impairment charge for long-lived assets. Other factors, such as increased competition or a decrease in the desirability of the Company’s products, could lead to lower projected sales levels, which would adversely impact cash flows. A significant change in cash flows in the future could result in an impairment of long lived assets.
	The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
	Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
	Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.
	Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.
	Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.
	The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.
	Website Development Costs
	The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for website development costs. Under the requirements of Sections 350-50-15 and 350-50-25, the Company capitalizes costs incurred to develop a website as website development costs, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of three (3) years. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
	Commitments and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
	Income Taxes Provision
	The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
	Uncertain Tax Positions
	The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.
	Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
	Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.
	There were no potentially outstanding dilutive shares for the reporting period ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.
	Cash Flows Reporting
	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
	Subsequent Events
	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.
Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.
The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.
The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.
The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.
The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations.
Finally, the amendments remove paragraph 810-10-15-16. Paragraph 810-10-15-16 states that a development stage entity does not meet the condition in paragraph 810-10-15-14(a) to be a variable interest entity if (1) the entity can demonstrate that the equity invested in the legal entity is sufficient to permit it to finance the activities that it is currently engaged in and (2) the entity’s governing documents and contractual arrangements allow additional equity investments.
The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage.
The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.
Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915.
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Going_Concern

Going Concern	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 3 - Going Concern	'
	The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at March 31, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	The Company is attempting to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.
	The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Notes_Payable

Notes Payable	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 4 - Note Payable	'
	Notes payable consisted of the following:
		March 31,			March 31,
		2014			2013
	Note payable, issued November 9, 2012, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		27,000			27,000
	Note payable, issued January 13, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		4,500			4,500
	Note payable, issued March 13, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		10,000			10,000
	Note payable, issued March 27, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,000			2,000
	Note payable, issued June 5, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,300			-
			46,800			43,500
	Current maturities of notes payable		(46,800	)		(43,500	)
	Notes payable, net of current maturities	$	-		$	-

Related_Party_Transactions

Related Party Transactions	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 5 - Related Party Transactions	'
	Related Parties
	Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:
	Related Parties	Relationship
	Lisa Grossman	President and stockholder of the Company
	Notes Payable - Related Parties
	Notes payable – related parties consisted of the following:
		31-Mar-14			31-Mar-13
	Note payable to President, issued on April 17, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	$	13,000		$	-
	Note payable to President, issued on May 6, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on June 17, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		10,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on July 15, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,437			-
	Note payable to President, issued on September 4, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		26,645			-
	Note payable to President, issued on September 18, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		6,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on October 16, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,500			-
	Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		100			-
	Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on December 11, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,500			-
	Note payable to President, issued on January 14, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		4,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on February 14, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on March 10, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		15,000			-
			93,182			-
	Current maturities of notes payable – related parties		(93,182	)		(-	)
	Notes payable – related parties, net of current maturities	$	-		$	-

Commitments_and_Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies	'
	Consulting Agreement
	On July 30, 2012, the Company executed a four-year consulting agreement for $12,000 per month with a related party commencing upon the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of equity financings (including financings with an equity component) resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of no less than $500,000 or (ii) September 1, 2012. The agreement calls for an automatic renewal for an additional three years if the Company has raised in total a minimum of two million in gross capital from any and all sources. On October 1, 2012 the agreement was modified whereby the compensation under the consulting agreement was waived for the period from October through December 2012.
	Consulting expenses recognized for the reporting period ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled $144,000 and $48,000, respectively.

Stockholders_Equity

Stockholders' Equity	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 7 - Stockholders' Deficit	'
	Shares Authorized
	Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is One Hundred and Fifty One Million (151,000,000) shares of which One Million (1,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and One Hundred and Fifty Million (150,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
	In-Kind Contribution
	For the reporting period ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, two shareholders of the Company contributed services valued at $10,400 for each reporting period.

Income_Tax_Provision

Income Tax Provision	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 8 - Income Tax Provision	'
	Deferred Tax Assets
	At March 31, 2014, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes of $509,181 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2034. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $173,122 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance.
	Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realization. The valuation allowance increased approximately $90,943 and $64,545 for the reporting period ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:
		31-Mar-14			31-Mar-13
	Net deferred tax assets – non-current:
	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	173,122		$	82,179
	Less valuation allowance		(173,122	)		(82,179	)
	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-
	Income Tax Provision in the Statement of Operations
	A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income tax provision is as follows:
		For the Fiscal Year Ended			For the Fiscal Year Ended
		March 31,			March 31,
		2014			2013
	Federal statutory income tax rate		34			34	%
	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)
	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%

Subsequent_Events

Subsequent Events	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 9 - Subsequent Events	'
	The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

Summary_of_Significant_Account1

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Policies	'
Basis of Presentation	'
	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Fiscal Year-End	'
	The Company elected March 31st as its fiscal year ending date.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions	'
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reporting amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimate(s) and assumption(s) affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	'
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	'
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include website development costs, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. When long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	The key assumptions used in management’s estimates of projected cash flow deal largely with forecasts of sales levels, gross margins, and operating costs of the manufacturing facilities. These forecasts are typically based on historical trends and take into account recent developments as well as management’s plans and intentions. Any difficulty in manufacturing or sourcing raw materials on a cost effective basis would significantly impact the projected future cash flows of the Company’s manufacturing facilities and potentially lead to an impairment charge for long-lived assets. Other factors, such as increased competition or a decrease in the desirability of the Company’s products, could lead to lower projected sales levels, which would adversely impact cash flows. A significant change in cash flows in the future could result in an impairment of long lived assets.
	The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.
Cash Equivalents	'
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	'
	Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.
	Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.
	Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.
	The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.
Website Development Costs	'
	The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for website development costs. Under the requirements of Sections 350-50-15 and 350-50-25, the Company capitalizes costs incurred to develop a website as website development costs, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of three (3) years. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Related Parties	'
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g.  other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitments and Contingencies	'
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition	'
	The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
Income Tax Provision	'
	The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions	'
	The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share	'
	Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.
	There were no potentially outstanding dilutive shares for the reporting period ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.
Cash Flows Reporting	'
	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events	'
	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	'
	In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.
	Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.
	The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.
	The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.
	The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.
	The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations.
	Finally, the amendments remove paragraph 810-10-15-16. Paragraph 810-10-15-16 states that a development stage entity does not meet the condition in paragraph 810-10-15-14(a) to be a variable interest entity if (1) the entity can demonstrate that the equity invested in the legal entity is sufficient to permit it to finance the activities that it is currently engaged in and (2) the entity’s governing documents and contractual arrangements allow additional equity investments.
	The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage.
	The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.
	Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915.
	Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Notes_Payable_Tables

Notes Payable (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Notes Payable Tables	'
Note Payable	'
	Notes payable consisted of the following:
		March 31,			March 31,
		2014			2013
	Note payable, issued November 9, 2012, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		27,000			27,000
	Note payable, issued January 13, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		4,500			4,500
	Note payable, issued March 13, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		10,000			10,000
	Note payable, issued March 27, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,000			2,000
	Note payable, issued June 5, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,300			-
			46,800			43,500
	Current maturities of notes payable		(46,800	)		(43,500	)
	Notes payable, net of current maturities	$	-		$	-

Related_Party_Transactions_Tab

Related Party Transactions (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Related Party Transactions Tables	'
Notes Payable Related Parties	'
		31-Mar-14			31-Mar-13
	Note payable to President, issued on April 17, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	$	13,000		$	-
	Note payable to President, issued on May 6, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on June 17, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		10,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on July 15, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,437			-
	Note payable to President, issued on September 4, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		26,645			-
	Note payable to President, issued on September 18, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		6,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on October 16, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,500			-
	Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		100			-
	Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on December 11, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		3,500			-
	Note payable to President, issued on January 14, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		4,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on February 14, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		2,000			-
	Note payable to President, issued on March 10, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand		15,000			-
			93,182			-
	Current maturities of notes payable – related parties		(93,182	)		(-	)
	Notes payable – related parties, net of current maturities	$	-		$	-

Income_Tax_Provision_Tables

Income Tax Provision (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Income Tax Provision Tables	'
Components of deferred tax assets	'
	Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:
		31-Mar-14			31-Mar-13
	Net deferred tax assets – non-current:
	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	173,122		$	82,179
	Less valuation allowance		(173,122	)		(82,179	)
	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-
Income Tax Provision in the Statement of Operations	'
	A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income tax provision is as follows:
		For the Fiscal Year Ended			For the Fiscal Year Ended
		March 31,			March 31,
		2014			2013
	Federal statutory income tax rate		34			34	%
	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)
	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%

Notes_Payable_Details

Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Notes payable	$46,800	$43,500
Current maturities of notes payable	-46,800	-43,500
Notes payable, net of current maturities	'	'
Note payable, issued November 9, 2012, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Notes payable	27,000	27,000
Note payable, issued January 13, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Notes payable	4,500	4,500
Note payable, issued March 13, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Notes payable	10,000	10,000
Note payable, issued March 27, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Notes payable	2,000	2,000
Note payable, issued June 5, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Notes payable	$3,300	'

Related_Party_Transactions_Det

Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Note payable - related party	$93,182	'
Current maturities of notes payable - related parties	-93,182	'
Notes payable - related parties, net of current maturities	'	'
Note payable to President, issued on April 17, 2013, with interest at 3% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	13,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on May 6, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	3,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on June 17, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	10,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on July 15, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	2,437	'
Note payable to President, issued on September 4, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	26,645	'
Note payable to President, issued on September 18, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	6,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on October 16, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	2,500	'
Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	100	'
Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	2,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on November 19, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	3,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on December 11, 2013, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	3,500	'
Note payable to President, issued on January 14, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	4,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on February 14, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	2,000	'
Note payable to President, issued on March 10, 2014, with interest at 10% per annum, with principal and interest due on demand	'	'
Note payable - related party	$15,000	'

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Commitments And Contingencies Details Narrative	'	'
Consulting expense	$144,000	$48,000

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_N

Stockholder's Deficit (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Stockholders Deficit Details Narrative	'	'
Fair value of contributed services	$10,400	$10,400

Income_Tax_Provision_Details

Income Tax Provision (Details) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Net deferred tax assets - non-current:	'	'
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$173,122	$82,179
Less valuation allowance	-173,122	-82,179
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	'	'

Income_Tax_Provision_Details_1

Income Tax Provision (Details 1)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Income Tax Provision Details 1	'	'
Federal statutory income tax rate	34.00%	34.00%
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards	-34.00%	-34.00%
Effective income tax rate	0.00%	0.00%

Income_Tax_Provision_Details_N

Income Tax Provision (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Income Tax Provision Details Narrative	'	'
Net operating loss carry-forwards for Federal income tax	$509,181	'
Expiration Date	'2034	'
Net deferred tax assets	173,122	'
Valuation allowance	$90,943	$64,545