Inland Real Estate Income Trust 424B3 Prospectus supplement

Filed pursuant to 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-176775

SUPPLEMENT NO. 16
DATED AUGUST 16, 2013
TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 18, 2012
OF INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

This Supplement No. 16 supplements, and should be read in conjunction with, the prospectus of Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., dated October 18, 2012, as previously supplemented by Supplement No. 11 dated April 16, 2013 (which superseded and replaced all prior supplements), Supplement No. 12 dated April 29, 2013, Supplement No. 13 dated May 14, 2013, Supplement No. 14 dated May 22, 2013 and Supplement No. 15 dated July 16, 2013. Unless otherwise defined in this Supplement No. 16, capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings as set forth in the prospectus.

Summary OVERVIEW

The following disclosures update the same sections contained in Supplement No. 15.

Our Debt Obligations

The following table summarizes, as of August 15, 2013, the material terms of any outstanding loans that we or our subsidiaries have obtained, or assumed at closing (dollar amounts stated in thousands):

Property Name	Date of Financing	Approximate Outstanding Principal Balance	Interest per Annum (%)	Maturity Date
Dollar General Properties (Phase II)	12/28/12	$4,140	4.347%	1/1/20 (2)
–Daleville, Mobile and Valley, AL; Brooks and LaGrange, GA; and Maryville, TN

Newington Fair Shopping Center –Newington, CT	12/27/12	$9,790	LIBOR + 3.25% with floor of 3.5% (1)	12/27/15

Dollar General Properties (Phase I)	11/6/12	$3,340	4.310%	12/1/19 (3)
–East Brewton, Robertsdale and Wetumpka, AL; and Madisonville and Newport, TN

(1) LIBOR means the London Interbank Offered Rate and represents the rate of interest at which banks offer to lend money to each other. The rate is used as an index to set the cost of a variable rate loan. In this case, the rate on the applicable loan is based on the “Three Month LIBOR” which as of August 15, 2013 was 0.2632% plus the applicable margin of 3.25%. (2) The date represents the anticipated repayment date, as defined. The maturity date is October 1, 2027. (3) The date represents the anticipated repayment date, as defined. The maturity date is May 1, 2027.

The loan documents for each of these mortgages payable contain customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants, agreements, representations, warranties and borrowing conditions, all as set forth in the loan documents. The loan documents also contain various customary events of default.

Distributions

We began paying distributions to stockholders of record during each day of December 2012. Because 2012 was a leap year, the December 2012 monthly distributions were equal to a daily amount of $0.001639344 per share per day. Beginning on January 1, 2013, the distributions paid and declared are equal to a daily amount of $0.001643836 per share per day, which if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 6.0% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share. A summary of the distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flows from operations through June 30, 2013 follows:

					Distributions Paid
Period	Distributions Declared		Distributions Declared Per Share		Cash		Rein- vested via DRP		Total		Cash Flows From Operations		Net Offering Proceeds
2^nd Quarter 2013	$	157,306	$	0.15 (1)	$	66,238	$	63,617	$	129,855	$	(242,969)	$	5,140,880 (2)
1^st Quarter 2013	$	74,600	$	0.15 (3)	$	42,218	$	11,922	$	54,140	$	(788,803)	$	4,410,135 (2)
December 31, 2012 (4)	$	13,793 (5)	$	0.0508 (6)	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	(524,042)	$	1,699,688 (2)

(1)		Assumes that a share was issued and outstanding each day during the second quarter of 2013.
(2)		100% of distributions paid for the month of December 2012 and the first and second quarters of 2013 were paid from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering.
(3)		Assumes that a share was issued and outstanding each day during the first quarter of 2013.
(4)		We began paying distributions to stockholders of record during December 2012.
(5)		Distributions declared in December 2012 were paid on January 2, 2013.
(6)		Assumes that a share was issued and outstanding each day during the month of December 2012.

We have also paid distributions to each stockholder of record between July 1, 2013 and July 31, 2013. The monies used to pay these distributions were funded from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering. On July 9, 2013, our board of directors declared distributions payable to stockholders of record each day beginning on the close of business on August 1, 2013 through the close of business on August 31, 2013, and on August 8, 2013, our board of directors declared distributions payable to stockholders of record each day beginning on the close of business on September 1, 2013 through the close of business on September 30, 2013. We anticipate that all of the monies needed to pay our August 2013 and September 2013 distributions will be funded from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering. The distributions paid and declared are equal to a daily amount of $0.001643836 per share per day, which if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 6.0% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share. Distributions declared for each day of the month of August will be paid no later than September 7, 2013, and distributions declared for each day of the month of September will be paid no later than October 7, 2013.

We intend to continue paying distributions for future periods in the amounts and at times as determined by our board. We anticipate that some or all of the monies needed to pay future distributions will be funded from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering until we make investments that generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fully pay distributions. See also “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business — The amount and timing of distributions, if any, may vary. We may pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations, including the net offering proceeds of this offering.” and “— To date, we have not generated sufficient cash flow from operations to pay distributions, and, therefore, we have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering, which may reduce the amount of cash we ultimately invest in assets, negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment and be dilutive to our stockholders.”

DESCRIPTION OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS

The following supersedes and replaces the section of Supplement No. 15 to the prospectus captioned “Financing Transactions – Dollar General Properties (Phase II) – Bank of the Ozarks Loan,” on page 30.

Bank of the Ozarks Loan. We also entered into a loan agreement in an aggregate principal amount equal to approximately $4.7 million from Bank of the Ozarks (sometimes referred to herein as the “third loan”) of which approximately $1.96 million was used to fund a portion of the seven “Phase II” properties and the remainder of which was used to partially fund the Newington Fair Shopping Center. As of August 13, 2013 the entire principal balance and accrued and unpaid interest of the third loan had been paid in full.

RISK FACTORS

The following risk factor is inserted to the section captioned “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business.” which begins on page 37 of the prospectus.

To date, we have not generated sufficient cash flow from operations to pay distributions, and, therefore, we have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering, which reduces the amount of cash we ultimately have to invest in assets, negatively impacting the value of our stockholders’ investment and is dilutive to our stockholders.

We expect to generate little, if any, cash flow from operations until we make substantial investments. Our organizational documents permit us to make distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations. Specifically, some or all of our distributions may be paid from retained cash flow, from borrowings, from cash flow from investing activities, including the net proceeds from the sale of our assets, or from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering. Accordingly, until such time as we are generating cash flow from operations sufficient to cover distributions, we may determine not to pay distributions or to pay all or a portion of our distributions from other sources. We have not established any limit on the extent to which we may use alternate sources, including borrowings or proceeds of this offering, to pay distributions. We began declaring distributions to stockholders of record during December 2012. We have paid distribution to stockholders of record through July 31, 2013. One hundred percent (100%) of the distributions paid to stockholders for these periods were paid from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering, which is dilutive to our stockholders. To the extent we make cash distributions, or a portion thereof, from sources other than cash flow from operations, we will have less capital available to invest in properties and other real estate-related assets, the book value per share may decline. Further, distributions that exceed net operating cash flow may not be sustainable. In addition, by using the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering to fund distributions, earlier investors may benefit from the investments made with funds raised later in our “best efforts” offering, while later investors may not benefit from all of the net offering proceeds raised from earlier investors.

The following risk factor is inserted immediately after the risk factor captioned “We incurred net losses on a U.S. GAAP basis for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013,” located on page 2 of Supplement No.13.

We have incurred net losses on a U.S. GAAP basis for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013.

We incurred a net loss on a U.S. GAAP basis for the quarterly and six month period ended June 30, 2013 of $452,346 and $1,312,215, respectively. Our losses can be attributed, in part, to startup costs and expenses along with the impact of depreciation and amortization which are non-cash expenses but which reduce our net income on a U.S. GAAP basis. We may incur net losses in the future, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, operations, cash flow, and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay distributions to our stockholders. We are subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any business, including the risk that the value of an investor’s investment could decline substantially. We were formed in August 2011 and, as of June 30, 2013, had acquired 13 retail properties. We cannot assure you that, in the future, we will be profitable, will generate positive cash flow or that we will realize growth in the value of our assets.

The following supersedes and replaces the risk factor captioned “The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and invest in real estate assets,” located on page 2 of Supplement No.13.

The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and invest in real estate assets.

The Federal Insurance Deposit Corporation, or “FDIC,” generally only insures limited amounts per depositor per insured bank. Through 2013, the FDIC is insuring up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank account. At June 30,2013, we had cash and cash equivalents exceeding these federally insured levels. If the banking institutions in which we have deposited funds ultimately fails, we may lose our deposits over the federally insured levels. The loss of our deposits could reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute or invest.

The following supersedes and replaces the risk factor captioned “Certain of our tenants generated a significant portion of our revenue, and rental payment defaults by this significant tenant could adversely affect our results of operations,” located on page 2 of Supplement No.13.

We generated a significant portion of our revenue from three tenants, and rental payment defaults by these significant tenants could adversely affect our results of operations.

For the three and six months ended June 30,2013, approximately 47.2%, 39.4% and 13.4%of our consolidated rental revenue was generated from leases with Dolgencorp, LLC, a subsidiary of Dollar General Corporation, L.A. Fitness and Sam’s Club, respectively. Dollar General Corporation has guaranteed all rents and other sums due under each lease with Dolgencorp, LLC in the event that Dolgencorp, LLC defaults. As a result of the concentration of revenue generated from these properties, if any of these tenants were to cease paying rent or fulfilling their other monetary obligations, or if Dollar General Corporation did not fulfill its obligations under the guarantee, we could have significantly reduced rental revenues or higher expenses until the default was cured or the properties were leased to a new tenant or tenants. In addition, there is no assurance that the properties could be re-leased on similar or better terms, if at all.

The following supersedes and replaces the risk factor captioned “The majority of our real estate investments may include single-tenant properties that may be difficult to sell or re-lease upon tenant defaults or early lease terminations,” located on page 3 of Supplement No.13.

The majority of our real estate investments may include single-tenant properties that may be difficult to sell or re-lease upon tenant defaults or early lease terminations.

As of June 30,2013, 92% of our properties were single-tenant properties.The success of those properties will be materially dependent on the financial stability of the tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions we pay. A default of a tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue from the property and force us to find an alternative source of revenue to meet any mortgage payment and prevent a foreclosure if the property is subject to a mortgage. In the event of a default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting the property. If a lease is terminated, there is no assurance that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. A default by a tenant, the failure of a guarantor to fulfill its obligations or other premature termination of a lease, or a tenant’s election not to extend a lease upon its expiration, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to pay distributions.

The following supersedes and replaces the risk factor captioned “We exceeded the total limit we may borrow as set by our charter which may reduce the funds available for distribution and increase the risk of loss since defaults may cause us to lose the properties securing the loans,” which begins on page 3 of Supplement No.13.

We exceeded the total limit we may borrow as set by our charter which may reduce the funds available for distribution and increase the risk of loss since defaults may cause us to lose the properties securing the loans.

As of June 30, 2013 we had borrowed $23,656,707, and had exceeded the limit set forth in our charter. Notwithstanding the determination by our board that exceeding the limit was justified, there is no assurance that we will not exceed the limit in the future. As noted herein, principal and interest payments on borrowings reduces the funds available for, among other things, acquisitions, capital expenditures for existing properties or distributions to our stockholders. The level of our borrowing increases the risk of loss that may result from a default(s).

If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from our properties and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt, then the amount of cash flow from operations available for distributions to stockholders will be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In such a case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of your investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure is treated as a sale of the property or properties for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the property or properties. If the outstanding balance of the debt exceeds our tax basis in the property or properties, we would recognize taxable gain on the foreclosure but would not receive any cash proceeds. We also have, and may in the future, fully or partially guaranteed monies that subsidiaries borrow to purchase or operate properties. In these cases, we will likely be responsible to the lender for repaying some or all of the loan(s) that is in default. If any mortgage contains cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, more than one property may be affected by a default.

The following supersedes and replaces the risk factor captioned “Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders,” located on page 3 of Supplement No.13.

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We have borrowed money, which bears interest at variable rates, and therefore are exposed to increases in costs in a rising interest rate environment. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense on any variable rate debt, as well as any debt that must be refinanced at higher interest rates at the time of maturity. Our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected due to the increased requirement to service our debt and could reduce the amount we are able to distribute to our stockholders. As of June 30,2013 we had $14,448,497 or 61% of our total debt that bore interest at variable rates, of which $4,658,497 matures in 2013.

The following supersedes and replaces the risk factor captioned “To date, we have not generated sufficient cash flow from operations to pay distributions, and, therefore, we have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering, which may reduce the amount of cash we ultimately invest in assets, negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment and be dilutive to our stockholders,” located on page 3 of Supplement No.12.

We have not yet generated positive cash flow from operations and there is no assurance that we will do so unless our asset base grows significantly. Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations. Specifically, some or all of our distributions may be paid from retained cash flow, from borrowings and from cash flow from investing activities, including the net proceeds from the sale of our assets, or from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” Offering. Accordingly, until such time as we are generating cash flow from operations sufficient to cover distributions, during the pendency of our “best-efforts offering,” we have and will likely continue to pay distributions from the net proceeds of this offering. We have not established any limit on the extent to which we may use alternate sources, including borrowings or proceeds of the Offering, to pay distributions. We began declaring distributions to stockholders of record during December 2012. One hundred percent (100%) of the distributions paid to stockholders were paid from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering, which reduces the proceeds available for other purposes. To the extent we pay cash distributions, or a portion thereof, from sources other than cash flow from operations, we will have less capital available to invest in properties and other real estate-related assets, the book value per share may decline, and there will be no assurance that we will be able to sustain distributions at that level. Further, distributions that exceed cash flow from operations may not be sustainable. In addition, by using the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering to fund distributions, earlier investors may benefit from the investments made with funds raised later in our “best efforts” offering, while later investors may not benefit from all of the net offering proceeds raised from earlier investors.

MANAGEMENT

The following information updates the discussion contained in the section of our prospectus captioned “Management – The Inland Group,” which begins on page 106 of the prospectus.

Robert D. Parks has over forty years of experience in the commercial real estate industry, having been a principal of the Inland real estate organization since May 1968. Mr. Parks is currently chairman of IREIC, a position he has held since November 1984. He has also served as a director of Inland Investment Advisors, Inc. since June 1995, and served as a director of Inland Securities Corporation from August 1984 until June 2009. He served as a director of Inland Real Estate Corporation from 1994 through June 2008, and served as chairman of the board from May 1994 to May 2004 and president and chief executive officer from 1994 to April 2008. He also served as a director and chairman of the board of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. from its inception in September 1998 to March 2006, and as chief executive officer until December 2004, and as the chairman of the board and a director of Retail Properties of America, Inc. (formerly, Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.) from its inception in March 2003 to October 2010. Mr. Parks also has served as the chairman of the board and a director of Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust, Inc. since its inception in June 2008, and Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. since its inception in October 2004.

He received his bachelor degree from Northeastern Illinois University in Chicago, and his master's degree from the University of Chicago and later taught in Chicago's public schools. He is a member of NAREIT.

The following updates the discussion contained in the section of our prospectus captioned "Management -- Inland Securities Corporation," which begins on page 124 of the prospectus.

Inland Securities Corporation

Mr. Brian M. Conlon was appointed the chief executive officer of Inland Securities Corporation on August 12, 2013. Mr. Conlon previously served as a director and the president of Inland Securities Corporation from July 2009 and June 2009, respectively, through December 31, 2012.

Ms. Conlon's biography is set forth below.

Brian M. Conlon has been the chief executive officer of Inland Securities Corporation since August 12, 2013. He previously served as director and the president of Inland Securities Corporation from July 2009 and June 2009, respectively, through December 31, 2013. Mr. Conlon has also served as the chief executive officer (from February 2012 to December 2012) and a director (February 2011 to December 2012) of IREIC, and served as its president from January 2011 to February 2012. Mr. Conlon joined Inland Securities Corporation as executive vice president in September 1999 and served in that position until June 2009. Prior to joining Inland, Mr. Conlon was executive vice president and chief operating officer of Wells Real Estate Funds, where he was responsible for overseeing day-to-day operations of the company’s real estate investment and capital raising initiatives. Mr. Conlon is a general securities principal, is licensed as a real estate broker in Georgia, and has earned the certified financial planner and certified commercial investment member designations. Mr. Conlon served on the national board of directors for the Financial Planning Association in 2001 and 2002. Mr. Conlon received his bachelor degree from Georgia State University in Atlanta, Georgia and received a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Dallas, in Dallas, Texas. Mr. Conlon holds Series 7, 24 and 63 certifications with FINRA.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion updates the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” incorporated by reference into the prospectus.

The following discussion and analysis relates to the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. You should read the following discussion and analysis along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this supplement.

Overview

We are an externally managed Maryland corporation formed in August 2011 to acquire a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate located throughout the United States. We are managed by our business manager, IREIT Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. referred to herein as our “Business Manager.” We may acquire retail properties, office buildings, multi-family properties and industrial/distribution and warehouse facilities. Within these property types, we will focus primarily on “core” real estate assets.

Core real estate assets are those assets that typically satisfy some, but not necessarily all, of the following criteria:

	▪		properties located within major regional markets or accelerating secondary markets;

	▪		properties with above-market occupancy rates, with leases that provide for market rental rates and that have staggered maturity dates; and

	▪		properties that have anchor tenants with strong credit ratings.

Core real estate assets also typically provide predictable, steady cash flow and have a lower risk profile than non-core real estate assets. We also may purchase single-tenant, net-leased properties within any of these four property types. We may purchase existing or newly-constructed properties as well as properties that are under development or construction, including those where development has not commenced. In addition, in all cases, we may acquire properties directly, by purchasing the property, also known as a “fee interest,” or through joint ventures, including joint ventures in which we do not own a controlling interest. We also may invest in real estate-related equity securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies, as well as commercial mortgage-backed securities.

On October 18, 2012 we commenced our initial public offering, referred to herein as the “Offering.” We are offering 150,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $10.00 per share on a “best efforts” basis through Inland Securities Corporation, or “Inland Securities,” our dealer manager, a wholly owned subsidiary of our sponsor, Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation, referred to herein as our “Sponsor.” “Best efforts” means that Inland Securities is not obligated to purchase any specific number or dollar amount of shares. We also are offering up to 30,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $9.50 per share to stockholders who elect to participate in our distribution reinvestment plan (“DRP”). In each case, the offering price was determined arbitrarily by our board of directors.

AtJune 30, 2013, we ownedthirteen retail properties totaling298,095 square feet. As ofJune 30, 2013, our portfolio had physical and economic occupancy of100% and our annualized base rent per square foot averaged$8.01.Annualized base rent is calculated by annualizing the current, in-place monthly base rent for leases, including any tenant concessions, such as rent abatement or allowances, which may have been granted.

References in this Report to “Inland” refer to some or all of the entities that are part of The Inland Real Estate Group of Companies, Inc., which is comprised of a group of independent legal entities, some of which may be affiliates, share some common ownership or have been previously sponsored or managed by our Sponsor or its subsidiaries.

Market Outlook

As we proceed with the growth stage of our capital raising efforts, we believe that our executive management team is well positioned to execute our business strategy of acquiring quality commercial real estate assets that will generatesustainable and predictable distributions for our stockholders. Ms. McGuinness, director, president and chief operating officer of the Company, has been with Inland for over 14 years. She also serves as the president and chief executive officer forthe entities owning the real estate managers for Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust, Inc. Previously, Ms. McGuinness was head of property management for Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc., which had a successful liquidity event when it was acquired in a merger with Developers Diversified Realty Corporation (NYSE:DDR). In addition to our executive management team, Mr. Goodwin serves as our director and chairman of the board. He founded the Inland real estate organization in 1968 and has also served as director of Inland Real Estate Corporation (NYSE:IRC) since 2001 and served as Inland Real Estate Corporation chairman of the board from 2004 through 2008.

Today’s economic environment continues to be characterized by historically low interest rates that may start to increase capitalization rates for commercial properties. Commercial property prices have nearly recovered to 2007 values in many sectors. Although mild, we believe that the economy is moving from recovery status toward a growth cycle. Demographic trends are also favorable. In the past four years the population of the United States has grown, but there has been very little new real estate development during this period of time. While tenants recently have had pricing power over property owners, we believe we have reached an inflection point where that pricing power related to tenant leases will return to the property owner due to supply and demand considerations.

Our general experience tells us that a period of rising inflation can translate to a period of rising rental rates, particularly at multi-tenant retail properties that include a higher instance of lease roll-over. In comparison to single-tenant properties with longer leases, this provides significantly more opportunities to increase rental rates as a higher percentage of leases expire more frequently. As of June 30, 2013, we own 12 single tenant properties and one multi-tenant property with average lease expirations of 14 years and 12 years, respectively.

As a demonstration of its commitment to investors, IREIC, our Sponsor, invested $2.0 million and received approximately 222,222 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share on October 26, 2012. IREIC’s invested capital, combined with capital from early investors, helped satisfy our minimum offering requirement in the majority of jurisdictions and enabled us to purchase 12 single-tenant triple net lease properties, as well as one multi-tenant retail property.

Our management team continues to believe that we can produce the best risk adjusted returns in multi-tenant necessity-based retail shopping centers. This sector of the retail asset class is characterized by multiple leases with a wide variety of tenants on each property. As we raise capital, our management team intends to begin to shift its focus toward the multi-tenant retail space similar to our acquisition of the 186,205 square foot Newington Fair Shopping Center in Newington, Connecticut, but may continue to purchase net leased opportunities characterized by longer-term leases secured by high quality credit tenants.

Our investment mandate allows us to build our portfolio with core assets in core markets. We endeavor to find the best risk-adjusted opportunities, given the considerable resources available to us through our real estate managers, our business manager and our business manager’s acquisitions team.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our principal demand for funds is to acquire real estate assets, to pay operating and offering expenses, to pay interest on our outstanding indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders. We will generally seek to fund our cash needs for items other than asset acquisitions and offering costs from operations. Our cash needs for acquisitions will be funded primarily from the sale of our shares, including those offered for sale through our distribution reinvestment plan, as well as financing to be obtained concurrent with an acquisition or in the future. There may be a delay between the sale of our shares and our purchase of assets, which could result in a delay in generating returns, if any, from our investment operations. Our Business Manager, its acquisition group, and Inland Real Estate Acquisitions, or “IREA,” evaluates potential acquisitions and engages in negotiations with sellers and lenders on our behalf. Pending investment in real estate assets, we may decide to temporarily invest any unused proceeds from the Offering in certain investments that could yield lower returns than those earned on real estate assets. These lower returns may affect our ability to make or fund distributions to you.

Potential future sources of liquidity include continued proceeds from the best efforts offering and DRP, proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of assets and undistributed cash flow from operations. If necessary, we may use financings or other sources of liquidity(capital) in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures. We have not identified any sources for these types of financings.

As of June 30, 2013, the Offering generated proceeds, net of commissions, the marketing contribution and due diligence expense reimbursements, the majority of which are re-allowed to third party soliciting dealers, totaling approximately $12.5 million.

Through June 30, 2013, our liquidity needs have primarily been to purchase twelve Dollar General retail stores and the Newington Fair Shopping Center, to pay organization and offering costs and to pay distributions. Our Sponsor advanced $1.63 million to us for the payment of organization and offering costs. The Company funded the purchase of the twelve Dollar General retail stores and the Newington Fair Shopping Center in 2012, with proceeds from mortgage and mezzanine loans totaling approximately $32.7 million and $10 in cash.

The Company primarily funded its first thirteen property acquisitions by obtaining first mortgages and mezzanine loans. The Company’s charter provides for limits on the amounts the Company may borrow. The amount is limited to an aggregate of 300% of our net assets, which equates to 75% of the costs of our assets. As permitted by our charter, however, our board of director’s may determine that a higher debt level is appropriate. As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s borrowings exceeded 300% of its net assets. The Company’s board, including the independent directors, unanimously determined that a higher level was appropriate for these acquisitions due to the fact that the Company was in the early stages of raising capital and acquiring properties.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had total debt outstanding of approximately $23.7 million, which bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 4.64% per annum, of which approximately $6.4 million is due in 2013, approximately $9.8 million is due in 2015, and the remaining amount of approximately $7.5 million is due in 2027. The Company intends to repay its mezzanine loans maturing in 2013 with proceeds from its “best efforts” offering. In July and August 2013, the Company repaid the remaining principal indebtedness outstanding (totaling approximately $1.7 million) under the mezzanine loan obtained in connection with the acquisition of the Newington Fair Shopping Center and repaid a portion of the remaining principal indebtedness outstanding (totaling $4.25 million) under the equity loan obtained in connection with the Newington Fair Shopping Center and the portfolio of seven Dollar General retail stores.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we owed approximately $2.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively, to our Sponsor and its affiliates for acquisition and business management fees, not otherwise waived, advances from our Sponsor which were used to pay administrative and offering costs, and certain accrued expenses which are included in due to related parties on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These advances from our Sponsor and its affiliates do not bear interest.

Our charter requires us to monitor our expenses on a trailing 12-month basis, and it states that our “total operating expenses” will be deemed to be excessive if, at the end of any quarter, they exceed for the prior trailing 12-month period the greater of 2% of our “average invested assets” or 25% of our “net income,” each as defined in our charter. For the trailing 12 months ended June 30, 2013, our “total operating expenses” as a percentage of “average invested assets” and “net loss” were approximately 5.0% and

-152%, respectively. Our board of directors, including all of our independent directors, reviewed this analysis and unanimously determined the excess to be justified, because we are in the early stages of our offering and acquiring properties. We expect our “total operating expenses” to fall within the parameters described above as we acquire more assets.

Distributions

We have not yet generated positive cash flow from operations and may not do so unless our asset base grows significantly. Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations. Specifically, some or all of our distributions may be paid from retained cash flow, from borrowings and from cash flow from investing activities, including the net proceeds from the sale of our assets, or from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” Offering. Accordingly, until such time as we are generating cash flow from operations sufficient to cover distributions, during the pendency of our “best-efforts offering,” we have and will likely continue to pay distributions from the net proceeds of this offering. We have not established any limit on the extent to which we may use alternate sources, including borrowings or proceeds of the Offering, to pay distributions. We began declaring distributions to stockholders of record during December 2012. These distributions were paid on January 2, 2013. Subsequently, the Company has paid monthly distributions to daily stockholders of record during each month of February, March, April, May and June 2013.One hundred percent (100%) of the distributions paid to stockholders were paid from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering, which reduces the proceeds available for other purposes. To the extent we pay cash distributions, or a portion thereof, from sources other than cash flow from operations, we will have less capital available to invest in properties and other real estate-related assets, the book value per share may decline, and there will be no assurance that we will be able to sustain distributions at that level. Further, distributions that exceed cash flow from operations may not be sustainable. In addition, by using the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering to fund distributions, earlier investors may benefit from the investments made with funds raised later in our “best efforts” offering, while later investors may not benefit from all of the net offering proceeds raised from earlier investors.

Cash Flow Analysis

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Net cash flows used in operating activities	$	(1,031,772)	$	(9,963)
Net cash flows used in investing activities	$	(112,941)	$	--
Net cash flows provided by financing activities	$	110,616	$	17,808

Cash used in operating activities was $1,031,772 and $9,963 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, funds generated from property operations were offset primarily by interest payments and general and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, cash was used to pay general and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the cash deficit was funded by net offering proceeds.

Cash used in investing activities was $112,941 and $0 for the six months ended June 20, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the first six months of 2013, we invested $100,000 in an unconsolidated entity, the insurance captive, paid $6,500 for capital expenditures and funded $6,441 to a required lender held replacement escrow.

Cash provided by financing activities was $110,616 and $17,808 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We generated proceeds from the sale of shares, net of offering costs paid, of $9,317,924 during the first six months of 2013 and paid offering costs of $382,192 during the first six months of 2012. Our Sponsor did not make any advances during the six months ended June 30, 2013, but did advance $400,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2012. We generated $75,539 from the DRP and paid $183,995 in distributions during the six months ended June 30, 2013. We also used $9,020,460 of offering proceeds to repay principal indebtedness, paid $8,180 in loan costs, and are owed $70,212 from related parties for costs paid on their behalf.

A summary of the distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flows provided by operations for thesix months endedJune 30, 2013 and 2012 follows:

Distributions Paid
Six months ended June 30,	Distributions Declared		Distributions Declared Per Share (1)		Cash		Rein- vested via DRP		Total		Cash Flows From Operations		Net Offering Proceeds (2) (3)

2013	$	231,906	$	0.30	$	108,456	$	75,539	$	183,995	$	(1,031,772)	$ 9,317,924

2012	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	(9,963)	$ --

(1)		Assumes a share was issued and outstanding each day during the period.
(2)		100% of distributions paid for the six months ended June 30, 2013, were paid from the net proceeds of our “best efforts” offering.
(3)		The Offering commenced on October 18, 2012.

Results of operations

The following discussion is based on our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. Although our results of operations include income and expense incurred for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we did not purchase our first property until November 6, 2012. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the properties generated approximately $582,000 and $1,156,000, respectively, of net operating income. Our net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, was $452,346 and $1,312,215, respectively, and included the following components.

Operating income (loss). Operating income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $10,107 and $(345,842), respectively, which consisted of total income, property operating expenses, real estate taxes, general and administrative expenses, business management fee and depreciation and amortization.

Total income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $711,252 and $1,400,399, respectively, which consisted primarily of tenant rental and recovery income. Our income was derived from three tenants with an annualized base rent per square foot of $8.01. Our portfolio’s physical and economic occupancy was 100%. Property operating expenses totaled $54,509 and $94,151, respectively, and consisted of property management fees and costs of owning and maintaining our investment properties. Real estate tax expense was $74,805 and $149,964 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. Certain property operating expenses and real estate taxes are recoverable from tenants per the terms of their lease agreements.

General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $269,752 and $897,968, respectively, of which $47,414 and $389,620, respectively, was paid or accrued to related parties. General and administrative expenses consisted primarily of related party stock discounts of $911 and $255,192, professional fees of $112,050 and $204,748 and other costs of $156,791 and $438,028, respectively.

Business management fee totaled $52,266 and $104,532 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. We may pay an annual business management fee equal to 0.65% of our average invested assets, as defined in the business management agreement, payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1625% of our average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaling $249,813 and $499,626 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, was a result of depreciation and amortization on the thirteen properties purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012.

Interest expense.Interest expense of $466,323 and $970,243 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, is due to the financing of thirteen properties purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entity.Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entity of $3,870 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, resulted from our allocated share of net income from our investment in the insurance captive.

Critical Accounting Policies

Disclosures discussing all critical accounting policies are set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2013, under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies.”

Stockholder Liquidity

We provide the following programs to facilitate additional investment in our shares at a discount from the offering price in the “best efforts offering” and without being charged sales commission, the marketing contribution or the due diligence expense allowance and to provide limited liquidity for stockholders.

Specifically, stockholders may acquire additional shares without paying sales commissions, the marketing contribution or the due diligence expense allowance by reinvesting some or all of their distributions through the “Distribution Reinvestment Program” or “DRP.” Presently, the DRP shares are issued through our DRP at a price equal to $9.50 per share.

The SRP is designed to provide existing stockholders with limited interim liquidity by enabling them to sell shares back to us subject to certain restrictions, as defined. The prices at which shares may be sold back to us as Ordinary Repurchases, as defined, are as follows:

▪		92.5% of the share price for stockholders who have owned their shares continuously for at least one year but less than two years;

▪		95% of the share price for stockholders who have owned their shares continuously for at least two years but less than three years;

▪		97.5% of the share price for stockholders who have owned their shares continuously for at least three years but less than four years; and

▪		100% of the share price for stockholders who have owned their shares for at least four years.

We are authorized to fund any repurchases by using only the proceeds generated from sales of shares under our DRP plan and we will limit the number of Ordinary Repurchases, as defined in the SRP, during any calendar year to 5% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year. Shares repurchased by the Company will be cancelled and will have the status of authorized but unissued shares. The repurchased shares will not be reissued unless they are first registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act and under appropriate state securities laws or otherwise issued in compliance with exemptions from the registration provisions contained in these laws. During any offering period, the repurchase price will be equal to or below the price of the shares specified in the Offering.

In the case of an Exceptional Repurchase, as defined in the SRP, upon the death or qualifying disability of a shareholder, the price at which shares may be sold back to us is equal to 100% of the share price. Exceptional Repurchases are not subject to a one-year holding period, or the 5% repurchase limit discussed above, and may be repurchased with funds of any type.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Selected Financial Data

The following table shows our selected financial data relating to our consolidated historical financial condition and results of operations. This selected data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report.

June 30,

2013

December 31,

2012

Total assets

34,374,265

35,259,075

Mortgages and notes payable

23,656,707

32,677,167

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012

Total income	$	711,252	$	--	$	1,400,399	$	--
Net loss	$	(452,346)	$	(45,769)	$	(1,312,215)	$	(54,711)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted (a)	$	(0.43)	$	(2.29)	$	(1.68)	$	(2.74)
Distributions declared to common stockholders	$	157,306	$	--	$	231,906	$	--
Distributions per weighted average common share (a)	$	0.15	$	--	$	0.30 `	$	--
Cash flows used in operating activities	$	(242,969)	$	(961)	$	(1,031,772)	$	(9,963)
Cash flows used in investing activities	$	(53,226)	$	--	$	(112,941)	$	--
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities	$	(1,333,645)	$	(94,700)	$	110,616	$	17,808
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		1,051,400		20,000		779,333		20,000

(a)

The net loss attributable to common stockholders, per share basic and diluted is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The distributions per common share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year or period ended.

Subsequent Events

The board of directors of the Company declared distributions payable to stockholders of record each day beginning on the close of business on July 1, 2013 through the close of business on July 31, 2013. Distributions were declared in a daily amount equal to $0.001643836 per share, based upon a 365-year period. Distributions were and will continue to be paid monthly in arrears, as follows:

•		In July 2013, total distributions declared for the month of June 2013 were paid in the amount equal to $61,704, of which $32,128 was paid in cash and $29,576 was reinvested through the Company’s DRP, resulting in the issuance of an additional 3,113 shares of common stock.

•		In August 2013, total distributions declared for the month of July 2013 were paid in the amount equal to $86,327, of which $42,144 was paid in cash and $44,183 was reinvested through the Company’s DRP, resulting in the issuance of an additional 4,651 shares of common stock.

On July 5, 2013 and July 9, 2013, we used $300,000 and $1,427,760, respectively, of the net proceeds from our “best efforts” offering to repay the remaining principal indebtedness outstanding under the mezzanine loan obtained in connection with the acquisition of the Newington Fair Shopping Center on December 27, 2012.

On July 15, 2013, July 19, 2013, July 26, 2013, August 2, 2013 and August 8, 2013, we used $1,000,000, $500,000, $1,000,000, $750,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, of the net proceeds from our “best efforts” offering to repay the remaining principal indebtedness outstanding under the equity loan obtained in connection with the acquisition of the Newington Fair Shopping Center on December 27, 2012 and the acquisition of the portfolio of seven Dollar General retail stores purchased on December 28, 2012. The remaining amount outstanding after these payments is equal to $408,497.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following discussion updates the “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” incorporated by reference into the prospectus.

Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, including those caused by changes in interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates and commodity prices. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We may enter into financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in interest rates. The counterparties are expected to be major financial institutions.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to purchase properties or other real estate assets, maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures or operations. As of June 30, 2013, we had outstanding debt, which is subject to fixed interest rates and variable rates of $9,208,210 and $14,448,497, respectively, bearing interest rates in the range equal to 3.55% to 8.50% per annum. At June 30, 2013, our mortgage loans outstanding, including mezzanine debt, had a weighted average interest rate of 4.64%.

If market rates of interest on all debt which is subject to variable rates as of June 30, 2013 permanently increased by 1% (100 basis points), the increase in interest expense on this debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $144,485 annually. If market rates of interest on all debt which is subject to variable rates as of June 30, 2013 permanently decreased by 1% (100 basis points), the decrease in interest expense on this debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by the same amount, provided the variable rate of interest was greater than the minimum rate of interest.

If market rates of interest on all debt which is subject to fixed rates, assuming debt is refinanced, as of June 30, 2013 permanently increased by 1% (100 basis points), the increase in interest expense on this debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $92,082 annually. If market rates of interest on this debt which is subject to fixed rates, assuming debt is refinanced, as of June 30, 2013 permanently decreased by 1% (100 basis points), the decrease in interest expense on all debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by the same amount.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from our currently anticipated hedging strategy. We have not used derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations to date, but if we do, we will be exposed to both credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty will owe us, which creates credit risk for us because the counterparty may not perform. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. We will seek to manage the market risk associated with interest-rate contracts by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. There is no assurance we will be successful.

With regard to variable rate financing, our Business Manager assesses our interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. Our Business Manager maintains risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both of our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. While this hedging strategy is designed to minimize the impact on our net income and funds from operations from changes in interest rates, the overall returns on your investment may be reduced. Our board has not yet established policies and procedures regarding our use of derivative financial instruments for hedging or other purposes. As of June 30, 2013, we have not entered into any derivative financial instruments.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The following information is inserted at the end of the section of the prospectus captioned “Plan of Distribution,” which begins on page 207.

Status of the Offering

As of August 13, 2013, we satisfied our minimum offering requirement in Ohio and Tennessee. With the exception of subscription proceeds received from residents of Pennsylvania, all subscription proceeds have been released from the escrow account maintained by our third-party escrow agent.

The following table provides information regarding the total shares sold in our offering as of August 14, 2013.

	Shares	Gross Offering Proceeds ($) (1)	Commissions and Fees ($) (2)	Proceeds To Us, Before Expenses ($) (3)

From our sponsor in connection with our formation:	20,000	200,000	–	200,000

Shares sold in the offering:	2,145,600.138	20,659,641	1,343,029	19,316,612

Shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan:	15,715.542	149,298	-	149,298

Shares purchased pursuant to our share repurchase program:	-	-	-	-
Total:	2,181,315.680	21,008,939	1,343,029	19,665,910

(1)

Gross proceeds received by us as of the date of this table for shares sold to investors pursuant to accepted subscription agreements.

(2)

Inland Securities Corporation serves as dealer manager of this offering and is entitled to receive selling commissions and certain other fees, as discussed further in our prospectus.

(3)

Organization and offering expenses, excluding commissions, will not exceed 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds. These expenses include registration and filing fees, legal and accounting fees, printing and mailing expenses, bank fees and other administrative expenses.

ConsolidatedFinancial Statements

The following financial statements update the financial statements incorporated by reference into the prospectus.

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	F-3

Consolidated Statement of Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited)	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	F-7

F-1

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30, 2013 (unaudited)		December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Assets:
Investment properties:
Land	$	10,202,471	$	10,202,471
Building and other improvements		19,018,028		19,011,528
Total		29,220,499		29,213,999
Less accumulated depreciation		(417,163)		(31,790)
Net investment properties		28,803,336		29,182,209
Cash and cash equivalents		1,202,953		2,237,050
Investment in unconsolidated entity		103,870		--
Accounts and rents receivable		139,925		45,855
Acquired lease intangibles, net		3,218,877		3,333,131
Deferred loan fees, net		282,805		421,379
Investment in related party		1,000		1,000
Other assets		621,499		38,451
Total assets	$	34,374,265	$	35,259,075

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages and notes payable	$	23,656,707	$	32,677,167
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		314,007		541,275
Distributions payable		61,704		13,793
Acquired below market lease intangibles, net		380,836		393,196
Due to related parties		2,578,618		2,443,900
Other liabilities		25,154		170,130
Total liabilities		27,017,026		36,239,461

Commitments and contingencies

Equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding		--		--
Common stock, $.001 par value, 1,460,000,000 shares authorized, 1,394,270 and 276,239 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		1,394		276
Additional paid in capital (net of offering costs of $3,504,788 and $2,329,970 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)		10,073,533		192,905
Retained earnings (deficit)		(2,717,688)		(1,173,567)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		7,357,239		(980,386)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	34,374,265	$	35,259,075

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Inland REAL ESTATE Income Trust, Inc.

(a Maryland Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Income:
Rental income	$	606,217	$	--	$	1,212,434	$	--
Tenant recovery income		105,035		--		187,965		--
Total income		711,252		--		1,400,399		--

Expenses:
Property operating expenses		54,509		--		94,151		--
Real estate tax expense		74,805		--		149,964		--
General and administrative expenses to non-related parties		222,338		45,193		508,348		53,447
General and administrative expenses to related parties		47,414		576		389,620		1,324
Business management fee		52,266		--		104,532		--
Depreciation and amortization		249,813		--		499,626		--
Total expenses		701,145		45,769		1,746,241		54,771

Operating income (loss)		10,107		(45,769)		(345,842)		(54,771)

Interest expense		(466,323)		--		(970,243)		--
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entity		3,870		--		3,870		--

Net loss	$	(452,346)	$	(45,769)	$	(1,312,215)	$	(54,771)

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.43)	$	(2.29)	$	(1.68)	$	(2.74)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic and diluted		1,051,400		20,000		779,333		20,000

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Inland REAL ESTATE Income Trust, Inc.

(a Maryland Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

Six months ended June 30, 2013

(unaudited)

	Number of Shares	Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital		Retained Earnings (Deficit)		Total

Balance at January 1, 2013	276,239	$	276	$	192,905	$	(1,173,567)	$	(980,386)
Distributions declared	--		--		--		(231,906)		(231,906)
Proceeds from offering	1,110,080		1,110		10,724,723		--		10,725,833
Offering costs	--		--		(1,174,818)		--		(1,174,818)
Proceeds from distribution reinvestment plan	7,951		8		75,531		--		75,539
Discounts on shares to related parties	--		--		255,192		--		255,192
Net loss	--		--		--		(1,312,215)		(1,312,215)

Balance at June 30, 2013	1,394,270	$	1,394	$	10,073,533	$	(2,717,688)	$	7,357,239

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Inland REAL ESTATE Income Trust, Inc.

(a Maryland Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,312,215)	$	(54,771)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		499,626		--
Amortization of loan fees		146,754		--
Amortization of acquired below market leases		(12,360)		--
Straight-line rental income		(5,737)		--
Discount on shares issued to related parties		255,192		--
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entity		(3,870)		--
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(72,236)		44,808
Accounts and rents receivable		(88,333)		--
Due to related parties		212,780		--
Prepaid rent and other liabilities		(144,976)		--
Other assets		(506,397)		--
Net cash flows used in operating activities		(1,031,772)		(9,963)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(6,500)		--
Investment in unconsolidated entity		(100,000)		--
Restricted escrows		(6,441)		--
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(112,941)		--

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from offering		10,725,833		--
Proceeds from the distribution reinvestment plan		75,539		--
Payment of offering costs		(1,407,909)		(382,192)
Due to related parties, net		(70,212)		400,000
Distributions paid		(183,995)		--
Payment of loan costs		(8,180)		--
Payment of mortgages and notes payable		(9,020,460)		--
Net cash flows provided by financing activities		110,616		17,808

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,034,097)		7,845
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		2,237,050		34,088
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	1,202,953	$	41,933

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Inland REAL ESTATE Income Trust, Inc.

(a Maryland Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(unaudited)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid for interest	$	847,274	$	--

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:

Distributions payable	$	61,704	$	--

Accrued offering costs payable	$	229,126	$	205,121

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(unaudited)

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Readers should refer to the audited consolidated financial statements of Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are included in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report as certain footnote disclosures contained in such audited consolidated financial statements have been omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair presentation have been included.

(1) Organization

Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on August 24, 2011 to acquire and manage a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate investments located in the United States. Effective January 25, 2012, the Company changed its name from “Inland Core Assets Real Estate Trust, Inc.” to “Inland Monthly Income Trust Inc.,” and effective March 23, 2012, the Company changed its name from “Inland Monthly Income Trust, Inc.” to “Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.” The Company entered into a Business Management Agreement (the “Agreement”) with IREIT Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. (the “Business Manager”), an Affiliate of the Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation, to be the Business Manager to the Company. The Company is authorized to sell up to 150,000,000 shares of common stock (“Shares”) at $10 each in an initial public offering (the “Offering”) which commenced on October 18, 2012 and to issue 30,000,000 shares at $9.50 each issuable pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan (“DRP”).

The Company intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for federal income tax purposes commencing with the tax year ending December 31, 2013. If the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distributes at least 90% of its taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

F-7

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The Company will provide the following programs to facilitate investment in the Company’s shares and to provide limited liquidity for stockholders.

The Company will allow stockholders to purchase additional shares from the Company by automatically reinvesting distributions through the DRP, subject to certain share ownership restrictions. Such purchases under the DRP will not be subject to selling commissions or the marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance, and are made at a price of $9.50 per share.

The Company is authorized to purchase shares from stockholders who purchased their shares from us or received their shares through a non-cash transfer and who have held their shares for at least one year under the share repurchase program (“SRP”), if requested, if the Company chooses to repurchase them. Subject to funds being available, the Company will limit the number of shares repurchased during any consecutive twelve-month period to 5% of the number of shares outstanding at the beginning of that twelve-month period. Funding for the SRP will come from proceeds the Company receives from the DRP. In the case of repurchases made upon the death of a stockholder or qualifying disability, as defined, the Company is authorized to use any funds to complete the repurchase, and neither the one year holding period, the limit regarding funds available from the DRP nor the 5% limit will apply. The SRP will immediately terminate if the Company’s shares become listed for trading on a national securities exchange. In addition, the Company’s boards of directors, in its sole direction, may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the SRP.

At June 30, 2013, the Company owned thirteen retail properties totaling 298,095 square feet. As of June 30, 2013 the portfolio had economic and physical occupancy of 100%.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

General

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications were made to the 2012 financial statements to conform to the 2013 consolidated financial statement presentation.

F-8

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries. Wholly owned subsidiaries generally consist of limited liability companies (LLCs). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Each property is owned by a separate legal entity which maintains its own books and financial records and each entity’s assets are not available to satisfy the liabilities of other affiliated entities, except as otherwise disclosed in note 5.

Partially-Owned Entities

The Company will consolidate the operations of a joint venture if the Company determines that it is either the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) or has substantial influence and control of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the party that has the ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses and right to receive the returns from the VIE that would be significant to the VIE. There are significant judgments and estimates involved in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or the determination of who has control and influence of the entity. When the Company consolidates an entity, the assets, liabilities and results of operations will be included in our consolidated financial statements.

In instances where the Company determines that we are not the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or the Company does not control the joint venture but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions, the Company will use the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the operations of a joint venture will not be consolidated with the Company’s operations but instead our share of operations will be reflected as equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entity on our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, the Company’s net investment in the joint venture will be reflected as investment in unconsolidated entity on the consolidated balance sheets.

Offering and Organization Costs

Costs associated with the Offering are deferred and charged against the gross proceeds of the Offering upon closing. Formation and organizational costs were expensed as incurred.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and all short term investments with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.

F-9

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Acquisitions

Upon acquisition, the Company determines the total purchase price of each property, which includes the estimated contingent consideration to be paid or received in future periods, if any. The Company allocates the total purchase price of properties based on the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on Level 3 inputs, such as comparable sales values, discount rates, capitalization rates, revenue and expense growth rates and lease-up assumptions, from a third party appraisal or other market sources.

The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above market lease value and acquired below market lease value are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease as an adjustment to rental income. For below market lease values, the amortization period includes any renewal periods with fixed rate renewals. Amortization pertaining to the below market lease value of $6,180 and $0 was recorded as an increase to rental income for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $12,360 and $0 for the six months ended June 30,2013 and 2012, respectively.

The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease value is amortized on a straight-line basis over the acquired leases’ weighted average remaining term. The Company incurred amortization expense pertaining to acquired in-place lease intangibles of $57,127 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and$114,254and $0 for the six months ended June 30,2013 and 2012, respectively.

The portion of the purchase price allocated to customer relationship value is amortized on a straight-line basis over the weighted average remaining lease term. As of June 30, 2013,no amount has been allocated to customer relationship value.

The following table summarizes the Company’s identified intangible assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2013and December 31, 2012:

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Intangible assets:
Acquired in-place lease value	$	3,343,087	$	3,343,087
Accumulated amortization		(124,210)		(9,956)
Acquired lease intangibles, net	$	3,218,877	$	3,333,131

Intangible liabilities:
Acquired below market lease value	$	393,471	$	393,471
Accumulated amortization		(12,635)		(275)
Acquired below market lease intangibles, net	$	380,836	$	393,196

F-10

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

As of June 30,2013, the weighted average amortization periods for acquired in-place lease and below market lease intangibles are 15 and 16 years, respectively.

Estimated amortization of the respective intangible lease assets and liabilities as of June 30,2013 for each of the five succeeding years is as follows:

	Acquired In-Place Leases		Below Market Leases
��
2013 (remainder of year)	$	114,253	$	12,361
2014		228,507		24,721
2015		228,507		24,721
2016		228,507		24,721
2017		228,507		24,721
Thereafter		2,190,596		269,591
Total	$	3,218,877	$	380,836

Impairment of Investment Properties

The Company assesses the carrying values of its respective long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of the assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. In order to review its assets for recoverability, the Company considers current market conditions, as well as its intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. If the Company’s analysis indicates that the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, the Company recognizes an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the real estate property. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third party appraisals, where considered necessary (Level 3 inputs).

The Company estimates the future undiscounted cash flows based on management’s intent as follows: (i) for real estate properties that the Company intends to hold long-term, including land held for development, properties currently under development and operating buildings, recoverability is assessed based on the estimated future net rental income from operating the property and termination value; and (ii) for real estate properties that the Company intends to sell, including land parcels, properties currently under development and operating buildings, recoverability is assessed based on estimated proceeds from disposition that are estimated based on future net rental income of the property and expected market capitalization rates, less sale costs.

F-11

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The use of projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with our estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan the Company uses to manage its underlying business. However assumptions and estimates about future cash flows, including comparable sales values, discount rates, capitalization rates, revenue and expense growth rates and lease-up assumptions which impact the discounted cash flow approach to determining value are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions and the Company’s ultimate investment intent that occur subsequent to the impairment analysis could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of the real estate properties.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurredno impairment charges.

Capitalization and Depreciation

Real estate acquisitions are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Improvement and betterment costs are capitalized, and ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Transactional costs in connection with the acquisition of real estate properties and businesses are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Building and improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of30 years and5-15 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and site improvements.

Tenant improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the life of the asset or the term of the related lease as a component of depreciation and amortization expense. Leasing fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease as a component of depreciation and amortization expense.

Cost capitalization and the estimate of useful lives require judgment and include significant estimates that can and do change.

Depreciation expense was $192,686 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and $385,372 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Deferred Loan Fees

Direct financing costs are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term, or anticipated repayment date, of the related agreements as a component of interest expense.

F-12

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements

The Company has estimated fair value using available market information and valuation methodologies the Company believes to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that would be realized upon disposition.

The Company defines fair value based on the price that it believes would be received upon sale of an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below:

	Level 1 −		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.

	Level 2 −		Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

	Level 3 −		Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

F-13

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Revenue Recognition

The Company commences revenue recognition on its leases based on a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of, or controls the physical use of, the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. The determination of who is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a lease begins. If the Company is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the finished space and revenue recognition begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space, typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If the Company concludes it is not the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements (the lessee is the owner), then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded by the Company under the lease are treated as lease incentives which reduces revenue recognized over the term of the lease. In these circumstances, the Company begins revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space for the lessee to construct their own improvements. The Company considers a number of different factors to evaluate whether it or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. The determination of who owns the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, is subject to significant judgment.

Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between rental income earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of accounts and rents receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Due to the impact of the straight-line basis, rental income generally will be greater than the cash collected in the early years and decrease in the later years of a lease. The Company periodically reviews the collectability of outstanding receivables. Allowances are taken for those balances that the Company deems to be uncollectible, including any amounts relating to straight-line rent receivables.

Reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate tax and operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. The Company makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. The Company does not expect the actual results to materially differ from the estimated reimbursement.

The Company records lease termination income if there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and amounts due are considered collectible. Upon early lease termination, the Company provides for gains or losses related to unrecovered intangibles and other assets.

As a lessor, the Company defers the recognition of contingent rental income, such as percentage rent, until the specified target that triggered the contingent rental income is achieved.

F-14

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not they will be realized. A valuation allowance is established for uncertainties relating to realization of deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had a deferred tax asset of approximately $993,739 and $466,229, respectively, for income tax purposes, for which a valuation allowance was recorded due to current uncertainty of realization.

(3) Investment in Unconsolidated Entity

The Company is a member of a limited liability company formed as an insurance association captive (the “Insurance Captive”), which is wholly-owned by the Company andthree related parties, Inland Real Estate Corporation, Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc., and Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust, Inc., a third party, Retail Properties of America, Inc., and serviced by an affiliate of the Business Manager, Inland Risk and Insurance Management Services, Inc. This entity is considered a variable interest entity and the Company is not the primary beneficiary, therefore, this entity is not consolidated by the Company and the equity method of accounting is used to account for this investment.

The Company entered into an agreement and paid $100,000 in exchange for a twenty percent membership interest in the Insurance Captive.The Company’s share of net income from its investment is based on the ratio of each member’s premium contribution to the venture. The Company was allocated income of$3,870 for thethree and six months endedJune 30, 2013 and $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

(4) Operating Leases

Minimum lease payments to be received under operating leases, including ground leases, as of June 30, 2013 for the years indicated, assuming no expiring leases are renewed, are as follows:

	Minimum Lease Payments

2013 (remainder of year)	$	1,194,337
2014		2,388,674
2015		2,388,674
2016		2,388,674
2017		2,388,674
Thereafter		20,651,467
Total	$	31,400,500

F-15

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

(5) Mortgages and Notes Payable

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had the following mortgages and notes payable outstanding:

Maturity Date	Property Name	Stated Interest Rate Per Annum	Principal Balance at June 30, 2013		Notes

May 1, 2027	Dollar General Portfolio - Phase 1 - five properties	4.31%	$	3,340,450	(a),(b)

December 27, 2015	Newington Fair Shopping Center - Senior Tranche	Floating rate of interest equal to three month LIBOR rate plus 3.25% subject to a minimum rate of 3.50%		9,790,000	(c),(d)

December 27, 2013	Newington Fair Shopping Center - Junior Tranche	8.50%		1,727,760	(c),(e)

December 27, 2013	Newington Fair Shopping Center & Dollar General Portfolio - Phase II - seven properties - mezzanine loan	Floating rate of interest equal to three month LIBOR rate plus 3.75% subject to a minimum rate of 6.00%		4,658,497	(c),(d),(f)

October 1, 2027	Dollar General Portfolio - Phase II - seven properties	4.347%		4,140,000	(a),(g)

		Total	$	23,656,707

F-16

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

(a)		Our Sponsor, IREIC, has guaranteed payment and performance of the debt in the event the Company fails to provide access or information to the properties or fails to obtain the lender’s prior written consent to any liens on or transfers of the properties, and in the event of any losses, costs or damages incurred by the lender as a result of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of any individual borrower, gross negligence or willful misconduct, material waste of the properties and the breach of any representation or warranty concerning environmental laws, among other things. The Company did not pay any fees or other consideration to our Sponsor for this guarantee.
(b)		The loan requires monthly payments of interest only until December 1, 2019 (the “anticipated repayment date”). In the event the loan is not repaid as of the anticipated repayment date, the loan will bear interest at a rate equal to 3% per annum plus the greater of: (1) 4.31%; or (2) the seven year swap yield as of the first business day after the anticipated repayment date; provided, however, that the revised interest rate may not exceed 9.31% per annum. In addition, the Company will be required to make monthly payments of $18,000 until the maturity date. The loan may be prepaid in full, but not in part, any time after December 1, 2014, provided that if the prepayment occurs prior to September 1, 2019, the Company will be required to pay a prepayment premium equal to the greater of: (1) 1% of the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the excess, if any, of: (a) the sum of the present values of all then-schedule payments of principal and interest under the loan documents, over (b) the principal amount being prepaid. Subject to satisfying certain conditions, as defined, the Company may prepay a portion of the loan equal to 120% of the portion of the loan allocated to a property and obtain the release of its property and the release of its related obligations under the loan documents. Assuming no payment has been made on principal in advance of the anticipated repayment date approximately $3,340,000 will be due on the anticipated repayment date. The loan is secured by cross-collateralized first mortgages on the five properties.
(c)		Loan requires monthly payments of interest only until maturity.
(d)		The three month LIBOR rate at June 30, 2013 was 0.274%.
(e)		Our Sponsor, IREIC, has fully and unconditionally guaranteed payment and performance. The Company did not pay any fees or other consideration to our Sponsor for this guarantee. On July 5, 2013, the Company repaid $300,000 and on July 9, 2013, the Company repaid the remaining principal amount outstanding of $1,427,760 (see Note 11).

F-17

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

(f)

This loan is secured pursuant to a “Blocked Account Control Agreement,” as defined, under which our Sponsor, IREIC, deposited an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the loan into a deposit account under the control of the lender. The loan may be prepaid in full or in part, at any time, and is not subject to any pre-payment premium. $2,745,996 of the loan is attributed to the Newington Fair shopping Center and $1,912,501 of the loan is attributed to the seven properties in the Dollar General Portfolio - Phase II. In addition to securing the loan, IREIC has fully and unconditionally guaranteed payment and performance. We did not pay any fees or other consideration to IREIC for this guarantee or for the pledge of security. On July 15, 2013, July 19, 2013, July 26, 2013, August 2, 2013 and August 8, 2013, the Company repaid $1,000,000, $500,000, $1,000,000, $750,000, and $1,000,000, respectively, representing a portion of the remaining principal balance outstanding (see Note 11).

(g)

The loan requires monthly payments of interest only until January 1, 2020 (the “anticipated repayment date”). In the event the loan is not repaid as of the anticipated repayment date the loan will bear interest at a rate equal to 3% per annum plus the greater of: (1) 4.347%; or (2) the seven year swap yield as of the first business day after the anticipated repayment date provided, however, that the revised interest rate may not exceed the 9.347% per annum. In addition, the Company will be required to make monthly payments of $22,653 until the maturity date.

The loan may be prepaid in full, but not in part, any time after January 1, 2015, provided that if the prepayment occurs prior to October 1, 2019, the Company will be required to pay a prepayment premium equal to the greater of: (1) 1% of the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the excess, if any, of: (a) the sum of the present values of all then-scheduled payments of principal and interest under the loan documents, over (b) the principal amount being prepaid. Subject to satisfying certain conditions, as defined, the Company may prepay a portion of the loan equal to 120% of the portion of the loan allocated to a property and obtain the release of its property and the release of its related obligations under the loan documents. The loan is secured by cross-collateralized first mortgages on the seven properties.

F-18

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The principal amount of our mortgage loans outstanding as ofJune 30, 2013 was $23,656,707 and had a weighted average interest rate of4.64% per annum and excluding the mezzanine loans the weighted average interest rate equaled 3.88% per annum. All of the Company’s mortgage loans are secured by first mortgages on the real estate assets or are guaranteed by the Sponsor. No fees were paid in connection with any guarantees issued by the Sponsor.

The mortgage loans require compliance with certain covenants, such as debt service ratios, investment restrictions and distribution limitations. As of June 30,2013, all of the mortgages were current in payments and the Company was in compliance with such covenants.

The following table shows the scheduled maturities of mortgages and notes payable as of June 30,2013and for the nextfive years and thereafter:

	Mortgages and Notes Payable

2013 (remainder of year)	$	6,386,257
2014		--
2015		9,790,000
2016		--
2017		--
Thereafter		7,480,450
Total	$	23,656,707

The Company estimates the fair value of its total debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently offered for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities by the Company’s lenders using Level 3 inputs. The carrying value of the Company’s mortgage debt was $23,656,707 and$32,677,167 as ofJune 30, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012, respectively, and its estimated fair value was $23,615,668 and$32,677,167 as ofJune 30, 2013andDecember 31, 2012, respectively.

The Company’s charterlimits the aggregate amount the Company may borrow, whether secured or unsecured, to an amount not to exceed 300% of net assets, equivalent to 75% of the costs of our assets, unless the Company’s board (including a majority of the independent directors) determines that a higher level is appropriate. As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s borrowings exceeded 300% of its net assets. The Company’s board, including the independent directors, unanimously determined that a higher level was appropriate due to the Company’s objective of acquiring a portfolio of real estate assets with leverage prior to the Company’s receipt of offering proceeds sufficient to enable the Company to meet the borrowing limit.

F-19

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

(6) Income Tax

The Company did not have material operations during the tax year ended December 31, 2012 and therefore we intend to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for federal income tax purposes commencing with the tax year ending December 31, 2013, our first year of material operations. If the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distributes at least 90% of its taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. Subsequently, if the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

The Company had no uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company expects no significant increases or decreases in uncertain tax positions due to changes in tax positions within one year of December 31, 2012. The Company has no interest or penalties relating to income taxes recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. As of June 30, 2013, returns for the calendar years 2012 and 2011 remain subject to examination by U.S. and various state and local tax jurisdictions.

(7) Distributions

The Company currently pays distributions based on daily record dates, payable monthly in arrears. The distributions that the Company currently pays are equal to a daily amount of $0.001643836, per share based upon a 365-day period. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company declared cash distributions totaling $231,906.

(8) Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (the “common shares”). Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the common shares plus potential common shares issuable upon exercising options or other contracts. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any dilutive common share equivalents outstanding.

F-20

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

(9) Segment Reporting

The Company has one reportable segment as defined by U.S. GAAP for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable currently exists due to the small number of tenants currently comprising the Company's rental revenue. The concentration of revenues for these tenants increases the Company's risk associated with nonpayment by these tenants. In an effort to reduce risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its larger tenants.

The entirety of the Company’s revenue was derived from three tenants for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. Approximately 47.2%, 39.4% and 13.4%of consolidated rental revenue was generated from leases with Dolgencorp, LLC, a subsidiary of Dollar General Corporation, L.A. Fitness and Sam’s Club, respectively.

(10) Transactions with Related Parties

The Company is party to an agreement with an LLC formed as an insurance association captive (the “Insurance Captive”), which is wholly-owned by the Company and three other REIT’s sponsored by our Sponsor, Inland Real Estate Corporation, Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc., and Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust, Inc., and a third party, Retail Properties of America. The entity is included in the Company’s disclosure of Investment in Unconsolidated Entity (note 3) and is included in investment in unconsolidated entity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company is a party to a Shared Services Agreement with other affiliated entities of the Sponsor. The agreement allows the Company to utilize certain software in the management of its business. The Company is obligated to pay $300,000 to be a party to the agreement. As of June 30, 2013, $150,000 remained unpaid and is included in due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company owns1,000 shares of common stock in the Inland Real Estate Group of Companies with a recorded value of$1,000 atJune 30, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012. This amount is included in investment in related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company was owed funds from related parties in the amount of $71,480 which was due from related parties for costs paid by the Company on their behalf. This amount is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

F-21

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The following table summarizes the Company’s related party transactions forthree and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.Certain compensation and fees payable to the Business Manager for services to be provided to the Company are limited to maximum amounts.

		Three months ended				Six months ended				Amount Unpaid as of
		6/30/13		6/30/12		6/30/13		6/30/12		6/30/13		12/31/12
General and administrative reimbursements	(a)	$	61,533	$	576	$	119,223	$	1,324	$	73,733	$	18,476
Acquisition related costs	(b)		(15,030)		--		15,205		--		483,102		524,342
Affiliate share purchase discounts	(c)		911		--		255,192		--		--		--

Total general and administrative expenses		$	47,414	$	576	$	389,620	$	1,324	$	556,835	$	542,818

Offering costs	(d)	$	625,515	$	11,048	$	886,024	$	15,476	$	137,251	$	271,082
Sponsor non-interest bearing advances	(e)		--		100,000		--		400,000		1,630,000		1,630,000
Real estate management fees	(f)		19,196		--		39,350		--		--		2,254
Business management fees	(g)		52,266		--		104,532		--		104,532		--


(a)		The Business Manager and its related parties are entitled to reimbursement for certain general and administrative expenses of the Business Manager and its related parties relating to the Company’s administration. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses to related parties in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Unpaid amounts are included in due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(b)		The Company will pay the Business Manager or its affiliates a fee equal to 1.5% of the “contract purchase price,” as defined, of each asset acquired. The Business Manager and its related parties are also reimbursed for acquisition and transaction related costs of the Business Manager and its related parties relating to the Company’s acquisition of real estate assets, regardless of whether the Company acquires the real estate assets, subject to limits, as defined. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses to related parties in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Unpaid amounts are included in due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(c)		The Company established a discount stock purchase policy for related parties and related parties of the Business Manager that enables the related parties to purchase shares of common stock at $9.00 per share. The Company sold 911 and 238,175 shares to related parties during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

F-22

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)


(d)		A related party of the Business Manager receives selling commissions equal to 7.0% of the sale price for each share sold and a marketing contribution equal to 3.0% of the gross offering proceeds from shares sold, the majority of which is re-allowed (paid) to third party soliciting dealers. The Company also reimburses a related party of the Business Manager and the soliciting dealers for bona fide, out-of-pocket itemized and detailed due diligence expenses in amounts up to 0.5% of the gross offering proceeds. The expenses will be reimbursed from amounts paid or re-allowed to these entities as a marketing contribution. The Company will reimburse the Sponsor, its affiliates and third parties for costs and other expenses of the Offering that they pay on the Company’s behalf, in an amount not to exceed 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds from shares sold in the “best efforts” offering. The Company does not pay selling commissions or the marketing contribution or reimburse issuer costs in connection with shares of common stock issued through the distribution reinvestment plan. Offering costs are offset against the stockholders’ equity accounts.

(e)		As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company incurred $3,533,635 and $2,358,818 of offering and organization costs, respectively, of which $1,630,000 was advanced by the Sponsor. Our Business Manager or its affiliates will pay or reimburse any organization or offering costs, including any issuer costs that exceed 11.5% of the gross offering proceeds from shares sold in the “best efforts” offering over the life of the Offering.

(f)		For each property that is managed by Inland National Real Estate Services, LLC or Inland National Real Estate Services II, LLC, or their affiliates, collectively the Real Estate Managers, the Company will pay a monthly real estate management fee of up to 1.9% of the gross income from any single-tenant, net-leased property, and up to 3.9% of the gross income from any other property type. Each Real Estate Manager will determine, in its sole discretion, the amount of the fee with respect to a particular property, subject to the limitations. For each property that is managed directly by one of the Real Estate Managers or its affiliates, the Company will pay the Real Estate Manager a separate leasing fee based upon prevailing market rates applicable to the geographic market of that property. Further, in the event that the Company engages its Real Estate Managers to provide construction management services for a property, the Company will pay a separate construction management fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered to similar projects in the geographic market of the project. The Company also will reimburse each Real Estate Manager and its affiliates for property-level expenses that they pay or incur on the Company’s behalf, including the salaries and benefits of persons performing services for the Real Estate Managers and their affiliates except for the salaries and benefits of persons who also serve as an executive officer of any of the Real Estate Managers. As of December 31, 2012, unpaid amounts were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets.

(g)		The Company will pay the Business Manager an annual business management fee equal to 0.65% of its “average invested assets,” as defined in the business management agreement, payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1625% of its average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. “Average invested assets” means, for any period, the average of the aggregate book value of the Company’s assets, including all intangibles and goodwill, invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in, and loans secured by, properties, as well as amounts invested in securities and consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures or other partnerships, before reserves for amortization and depreciation or bad debts, impairments or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of these values at the end of each month during the relevant calendar quarter.

F-23

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

(11) Subsequent Events

•		In July 2013, total distributions declared for the month of June 2013 were paid in the amount equal to $61,704, of which $32,128 was paid in cash and $29,576 was reinvested through the Company’s DRP, resulting in the issuance of an additional 3,113 shares of common stock.

•		In August 2013, total distributions declared for the month of July 2013 were paid in the amount equal to $86,327, of which $42,144 was paid in cash and $44,183 was reinvested through the Company’s DRP, resulting in the issuance of an additional 4,651 shares of common stock.

On July 5, 2013 and July 9, 2013, the Company used $300,000 and $1,427,760, respectively, of the net proceeds from our “best efforts” offering to repay the remaining principal indebtedness outstanding under the Junior Tranche loan obtained in connection with the acquisition of the Newington Fair Shopping Center on December 27, 2012.

On July 15, 2013, July 19, 2013, July 26, 2013, August 2, 2013 and August 8, 2013, the Company used $1,000,000, $500,000, $1,000,000, $750,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, of the net proceeds from our “best efforts” offering to repay a portion of the principal indebtedness outstanding under the equity loan obtained in connection with the acquisition of the Newington Fair Shopping Center on December 27, 2012 and the acquisition of the portfolio of seven Dollar General retail stores purchased on December 28, 2012. The remaining amount outstanding after these payments is equal to $408,497.

F-24

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

(a Maryland Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The following table provides information regarding the total shares sold in our offering as of August 6, 2013:

	Shares	Gross Offering Proceeds ($) (1)		Commissions and Fees ($) (2)	Proceeds to Us, Before Expenses ($) (3)
From our Sponsor in connection with our formation:	20,000.000		200,000	--		200,000
Shares sold in the offering:	1,982,253.948		19,060,144	1,214,667		17,845,477
Shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan:	15,715.542		149,298	--		149,298
Shares purchased pursuant to our share repurchase program:	--		--	--		--
Total:	2,017,969.490		19,409,442	1,214,667		18,194,775

(1)		Gross proceeds received by us as of the date of this table for shares sold to investors pursuant to accepted subscription agreements.
(2)		Inland Securities Corporation serves as dealer manager of the Offering and is entitled to receive selling commissions and certain other fees, as discussed further in the prospectus for the “best efforts” offering dated October 18, 2012 as the same may be supplemented from time to time.
(3)		Organization and offering expenses, excluding commissions, will not exceed 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds. These expenses include registration and filing fees, legal and accounting fees, printing and mailing expenses, bank fees and other administrative expenses.

F-25

Inland Real Estate Income Trust (INRE) 424B3Prospectus supplement