ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
(a) Organization and Business | ' |
(a) | Organization and Business: |
|
Infinity Real Estate Holdings Corporation (formally known as Accelerated Acquisitions XVI, Inc.) (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on October 21, 2011 for the purpose of raising capital that is intended to be used in connection with its business plan which may include a possible merger, acquisition or other business combination with an operating business. |
|
On July 23, 2012, Sole Comfort Shoes, Inc. (“Purchaser”) agreed to acquire 23,350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock par value $0.0001 for a price of $0.0001 per share. At the same time, Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC agreed to tender 3,500,000 of their 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock par value $0.0001 for cancellation. Following these transactions, Sole Comfort Shoes, Inc. owned approximately 94% of the Company’s 24,850,000 issued and outstanding shares of common stock par value $0.0001 and the interest of Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC was reduced to approximately 6% of the total issued and outstanding shares. Simultaneously with the share purchase, Timothy Neher resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors and Onkar Dhaliwal was simultaneously appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors. Such action represents a change of control of the Company. The Purchaser used their working capital to acquire the Shares. The Purchaser did not borrow any funds to acquire the Shares. |
|
On September 3, 2013, pursuant to Article V, Section 5.3 of the Company’s by-laws the Board of Directors authorized Sole Comfort Shoes, Inc. the Company’s majority stockholder to transfer 23,350,000 shares (100% of its holdings) of the Company’s common stock having a ($0.0001) par value to Infinity Financial Group, Inc. Following the transaction, Infinity Financial Group, Inc. owns approximately 88.61% of the Company’s 26,350,000 issued and outstanding shares of common stock have a ($0.0001) par value Simultaneously with the share transfer, Onkar Dhaliwal resigned as the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and David Lavoie was simultaneously appointed to be Company’s Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. Such action represents a change of control of the Company. Concurrent with the transfer of the shares, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware in order to change its name to “Infinity Real Estate Holdings Corporation”. |
|
On September 3, 2013, a meeting of the shareholders holding a majority of voting shares consented in writing in lieu of a shareholder meeting as provided for under Article I, Section 1.1 of the By-laws, and approved the amendment of its articles of incorporation authorizing the name of the Corporation to be changed from “Accelerated Acquisition XVI, Inc.” to “Infinity Real Estate Corporation” and further approved the increase of authorized common stock to 200,000,000 shares having a ($0.0001) par value and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock having a ($0.0001) par value, and further approved an amendment setting forth the name and address of the appointed director of the corporation to David Lavoie. The amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. |
|
The Company is currently in the development stage. All activities of the Company to date relate to its organization, initial funding and share issuances. |
(b) Basis of Presentation | ' |
(b) | Basis of Presentation – Development Stage and Going Concern |
|
The Company has not earned any revenue from operations since inception. Accordingly, the Company’s activities have been accounted for as those of a "Development Stage Enterprise" as set forth in ASC 915, "Development Stage Entities." Among the disclosures required by ASC 915, are that the Company’s financial statements be identified as those of a development stage company, and that the statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company's inception. |
|
The Company sustained operating losses and accumulated deficit of $11,748 as of June 30, 2013. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations and/or obtain additional financing, as may be required. |
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern; however, the above condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to do so. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. |
|
The unaudited condensed interim financial statements have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes for the year ended September 30, 2012 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending September 30, 2013. |
(c) Use of Estimates: | ' |
(c) | Use of Estimates: |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents | ' |
(d) | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers highly liquid financial instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalent at March 31, 2013 and September 30, 2012. |
(e) Loss per Common Share | ' |
(e) | Loss per Common Share |
|
Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each reporting period. Diluted per share includes potentially dilutive securities such as outstanding options and warrants, using various methods such as the treasury stock or modified treasury stock method in the determination of dilutive shares outstanding during each reporting period. The Company has incurred a loss during the current period, therefore any potentially dilutive shares are excluded, as they would be anti-dilutive. The Company does not have any potentially dilutive instruments for this reporting period. |
(f) Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
(f) | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10, (formerly SFAS No.157), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" for financial assets and liabilities. FASB ASC 820-10 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. |
|
- | Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
- | Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities. |
- | Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
|
The carrying amounts of financial assets such as cash approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. |
(g) Recent Accounting Prouncements | ' |
(g) | Recent Accounting Prouncements |
|
Adopted |
|
Effective January 2012, FASB adopted ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 represents the converged guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on fair value measurement. A variety of measures are included in the update intended to either clarify existing fair value measurement requirements, change particular principles requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend to change the application of existing requirements under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements. January 2012, FASB adopted ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 is intended to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of accounting guidance in this area with that of the IASB. The amendments require that all nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) : Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting. |
|
Standards Update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-12). ASU 2011-12 defers the provisions of ASU 2011-05 that require the presentation of reclassification adjustments on the face of both the statement of income and statement of other comprehensive income. Amendments under ASU 2011-05 that were not deferred under ASU 2011-12 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements. |
|
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-11). The amendments in ASU 2011-11 require the disclosure of information on offsetting and related arrangements for financial and derivative instruments to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Amendments under ASU 2011-11 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after January 1, 2013. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements. |
|
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASB’s deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements. |
|
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements. |
|
|
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2012-02—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, on July 27, 2012, to simplify the testing for a drop in value of intangible assets such as trademarks, patents, and distribution rights. The amended standard reduces the cost of accounting for indefinite-lived intangible assets, especially in cases where the likelihood of impairment is low. The changes permit businesses and other organizations to first use subjective criteria to determine if an intangible asset has lost value. The amendments to U.S. GAAP will be effective for fiscal years starting after September 15, 2012. The adoption of this ASU does not have a material impact on our financial statements. |
|
Not Adopted |
|
In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 will have on our financial statements |
|
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11: Balance Sheet (topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which requires new disclosure requirements mandating that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Entities should provide the disclosures required retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2011-11 on the financial statements. |
|
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements. |