Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] | (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (a) Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include those related to stock-based compensation; income tax uncertainties; and the useful lives of property and equipment (b) Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities to the Company of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Although the Company may deposit its cash and cash equivalents with multiple financial institutions, its deposits, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Cash equivalents were $ 2.2 2.9 (c) Receivables Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses. In establishing the allowance, management considers historical losses adjusted to take into account current market conditions and their customers’ financial condition, the amount of receivables in dispute, and the current receivables aging and current payment patterns. The Company had no write-offs in 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the Company did not record an allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 as there were no accounts receivable outstanding. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers. (d) Revenue Recognition In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) . (e) Property and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs that do not extend the life or improve the asset are expensed in the year incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are five years for laboratory and office equipment, three years for computer equipment and software, and seven years for furniture and fixtures. (f) Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows (undiscounted) expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount, or fair value, less costs to sell. (g) Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided against net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of its income tax expense. (h) Share-Based Payments The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for grants of stock option awards, restricted stock units and restricted stock under the Company’s Incentive Plan to employees and nonemployee members of the Company’s board of directors based on the grant-date fair value of those awards. The grant-date fair value of an award is generally recognized as compensation expense over the award’s requisite service period. In addition, the Company has granted performance-based stock option awards and restricted stock grants, which vest based upon the Company satisfying certain performance conditions. Potential compensation cost, measured on the grant date, related to these performance options will be recognized only if, and when, the Company estimates that these options will vest, which is based on whether the Company considers the options’ performance conditions to be probable of attainment. The Company’s estimates of the number of performance-based options that will vest will be revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods. In addition, the Company grants stock options to nonemployee consultants from time to time in exchange for services performed for the Company. Equity instruments granted to nonemployees are subject to periodic revaluation over their vesting terms. During July 2017, the Company modified 11,250 46,000 61,487 51,000 The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to compute the estimated fair value of stock option awards. Using this model, fair value is calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility of the Company’s Common Stock price, (ii) the periods of time over which employees and members of the board of directors are expected to hold their options prior to exercise (expected term), (iii) expected dividend yield on the Common Stock, and (iv) risk-free interest rates. Stock-based compensation expense also includes an estimate, which is made at the time of grant, of the number of awards that are expected to be forfeited. This estimate is revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. 2.7 2.4 1.2 Year Ended 2017 2016 2015 Research and development $ 794,367 $ 629,400 $ 287,491 General and administrative 1,921,775 1,691,949 862,927 Restructuring costs - 51,266 - $ 2,716,142 $ 2,372,615 $ 1,150,418 The Company issued 543,000 990,000 301,500 287,000 Key assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of stock options granted are as follows: Expected Term Share-Based Payment, Risk-Free Interest Rate Expected Dividend Expected Volatility Beginning in July 2017, the volatility factor is based solely on the Company’s trading history since March 2014. 2017 2016 2015 Expected term 5.85 years 5.84 years 5.75 years Risk-free interest rate 2.13 % 1.76 % 1.63 % Expected dividend yield Expected volatility 80.54 % 84.26 % 81.39 % FASB Stock Compensation, As of December 31, 2017, there was $ 2.8 2.04 2.45 6.06 6.60 736,000 (i) Fair Value The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company determines fair value based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in the principal or most advantageous market. When considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the following fair value hierarchy distinguishes between observable and unobservable inputs, which are categorized in one of the following levels: • Level 1 Inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. • Level 2 Inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuation in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. • Level 3 Inputs: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. All of the Company’s financial instruments are valued using quoted prices in active markets or based on other observable inputs. For accrued interest income, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, the carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. Fair value measurements at reporting date using December 31, Level 1 inputs Level 2 inputs Level 3 inputs Assets: Cash equivalents - money market funds $ 2,171,814 $ 2,171,814 $ - $ - Government bonds and notes 4,741,690 4,741,690 - - Corporate bonds, notes and commercial paper 13,515,631 - 13,515,631 - $ 20,429,135 $ 6,913,504 $ 13,515,631 $ - Fair value measurements at reporting date using December 31, Level 1 inputs Level 2 inputs Level 3 inputs Assets: Cash equivalents - money market funds $ 2,920,577 $ 2,920,577 $ - $ - Government bonds and notes 7,471,054 3,752,350 3,718,704 - Corporate bonds, notes and commercial paper 13,808,516 - 13,808,516 - $ 24,200,147 $ 6,672,927 $ 17,527,220 $ - The following methods and assumptions were used to determine the fair value of each class of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the balance sheets: Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents primarily consist of highly-rated money market funds and commercial paper with original maturities to the Company of three months or less and are purchased daily at par value with specified yield rates. Cash equivalents related to money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices or broker or dealer quotations for similar assets. Cash equivalents related to commercial paper are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using broker/dealer quotes, bids and offers, benchmark yields and credit spreads and other observable inputs. Government bonds and notes: The Company uses a third-party pricing service to value these investments. United States Treasury bonds and notes are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and reportable trades. Other United States government agency bonds are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using broker/dealer quotes, bids and offers, benchmark yields and credit spreads and other observable inputs. Corporate bonds, notes, and commercial paper: The Company uses a third-party pricing service to value these investments. The pricing service utilizes broker/dealer quotes, bids and offers, benchmark yields and credit spreads and other observable inputs. The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy on the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1 or Level 2 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. (j) Earnings (Loss) per Share Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was calculated using the two-class method, which is an earnings (loss) allocation method for computing earnings (loss) per share when an entity’s capital structure includes common stock and participating securities. The two-class method determines earnings (losses) per share based on dividends declared on common stock and participating securities (i.e., distributed earnings) and participation rights of participating securities in any undistributed earnings (loss). The application of the two-class method was required since the Company’s unvested restricted stock contains non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. However, unvested restricted stock grants are not included in computing basic earnings (loss) per share for periods where the Company has losses as these securities are not contractually obligated to share in losses of the Company. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus, where applicable, the additional potential common shares that would have been outstanding related to dilutive options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock to the extent such shares are dilutive. Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Basic loss per share attributable to common stock: Numerator Net loss $ (20,982,860) $ (18,971,508) $ (18,208,378) Denominator Weighted avg. common shares outstanding 20,051,934 18,258,149 16,470,814 Basic loss per share attributable to common stock $ (1.05) $ (1.04) $ (1.11) Diluted loss per share attributable to common stock: Numerator Net loss $ (20,982,860) $ (18,971,508) $ (18,208,378) Denominator Weighted avg. common shares outstanding 20,051,934 18,258,149 16,470,814 Diluted loss per share attributable to common stock $ (1.05) $ (1.04) $ (1.11) December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Stock options 2,374,449 2,225,850 1,722,552 Unvested restricted stock awards - - 3,000 Unvested restricted stock units 203,998 - - (k) Segment Information The Company is a single reportable segment engaged in research and development for the delivery of drugs using its proprietary delivery technology. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The chief operating decision maker made such decisions and assessed performance at the company level, as one segment. (l) Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries. The Company eliminates all intercompany accounts and transactions in consolidation |