Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] | (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (a) Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include those related to stock-based compensation; income tax uncertainties; and the useful lives of property and equipment. (b) Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities to the Company of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Although the Company may deposit its cash and cash equivalents with multiple financial institutions, its deposits, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Cash equivalents were $7.3 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017. (c) Receivables Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses. In establishing the allowance, management considers historical losses adjusted to take into account current market conditions and their customers’ financial condition, the amount of receivables in dispute, and the current receivables aging and current payment patterns. The Company had no write-offs in 2018, 2017 and 2016 and the Company did not record an allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 as there were no accounts receivable outstanding. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers. (d) Revenue Recognition In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) with amendments in 2015 (ASU 2015-14) and 2016 (ASU 2016-8, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20) . The updated standard is a new comprehensive revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company adopted this pronouncement effective January 1, 2017 and it did not have any effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations for the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016 as no revenue was recognized during these years. (e) Property and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs that do not extend the life or improve the asset are expensed in the year incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are five years for laboratory and office equipment, three years for computer equipment and software, and seven years for furniture and fixtures. (f) Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows (undiscounted) expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount, or fair value, less costs to sell. (g) Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided against net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of its income tax expense. (h) Share-Based Payments The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for grants of stock option awards, restricted stock units and restricted stock under the Company’s Incentive Plan to employees and nonemployee members of the Company’s board of directors based on the grant-date fair value of those awards. The grant-date fair value of an award is generally recognized as compensation expense over the award’s requisite service period. In addition, the Company has granted performance-based stock option awards and restricted stock units, which vest based upon the Company satisfying certain performance conditions. Potential compensation cost, measured on the grant date, related to these performance options will be recognized only if, and when, the Company estimates that these options or units will vest, which is based on whether the Company considers the performance conditions to be probable of attainment. The Company’s estimates of the number of performance-based options or units that will vest will be revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods. In addition, the Company grants stock options to nonemployee consultants from time to time in exchange for services performed for the Company. Equity instruments granted to nonemployees are valued based on the grant-date fair value of the awards. During July 2017, the Company modified 11,250 existing performance-vesting restricted stock units of a terminated employee by accelerating the vesting of these restricted stock units under the terms of the employee’s respective employment and severance agreement. Compensation expense of $46,000 was recorded as a result of the modification and recorded as general and administrative expense. Additionally, during August 2016 and in conjunction with the 2016 Restructuring Plan (see note 5), the Company modified 61,487 existing time-vested options of a terminated employee by extending the exercise period to three years from the date of modification under the terms of the employee’s respective employment and severance agreement. Compensation expense of $51,000 was recorded as a result of the modification and recorded as a restructuring charge. The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to compute the estimated fair value of stock option awards. Using this model, fair value is calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility of the Company’s Common Stock price, (ii) the periods of time over which employees and members of the board of directors are expected to hold their options prior to exercise (expected term), (iii) expected dividend yield on the Common Stock, and (iv) risk-free interest rates. Stock-based compensation expense also includes an estimate, which is made at the time of grant, of the number of awards that are expected to be forfeited. This estimate is revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Stock-based compensation cost that has been expensed in the statements of operations amounted to $ 1.5 2.7 2.4 Year Ended 2018 2017 2016 Research and development $ 587,437 $ 794,367 $ 629,400 General and administrative 870,283 1,921,775 1,691,949 Restructuring costs - - 51,266 $ 1,457,720 $ 2,716,142 $ 2,372,615 The Company issued 423,000 stock options, 543,000 stock options and 990,000 stock options, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Additionally, the Company issued 540,000 and 287,000 restricted stock units, respectively, during the Key assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of stock options granted are as follows: Expected Term : The expected term represents the period that the stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding. Due to limited historical experience of similar awards, the expected term was estimated using the simplified method in accordance with the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, Share-Based Payment, for awards with stated or implied service periods. The simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the contractual term and the vesting period of the stock option. For awards with performance conditions, and that have the contractual term to satisfy the performance condition, the contractual term was used. Risk-Free Interest Rate : The risk-free interest rate used was based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term. Expected Dividend : The expected dividend assumption is based on management’s current expectation about the Company’s anticipated dividend policy. The Company does not anticipate declaring dividends in the foreseeable future. Expected Volatility : Since the Company did not have sufficient trading history, the volatility factor was based on the average of similar public companies through August 2014. When selecting similar companies, the Company considered the industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Beginning in August 2014, the volatility factor is based on a combination of the Company's trading history since March 2014 and the average of similar public companies. Beginning in July 2017, the volatility factor is based solely on the Company’s trading history since March 2014. For options granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company calculated the fair value of each option grant on the respective dates of grant using the following weighted average assumptions: 2018 2017 2016 Expected term 5.78 years 5.85 years 5.84 years Risk-free interest rate 2.80 % 2.13 % 1.76 % Expected dividend yield — — — Expected volatility 83.56 % 80.54 % 84.26 % FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, Stock Compensation, requires the Company to recognize compensation expense for the portion of options that are expected to vest. Therefore, the Company applied estimated forfeiture rates that were derived from historical employee termination behavior. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods. As of December 31, 2018, there was $1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock option plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.01 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. The weighted average fair value of share-based compensation awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $1.01 per share, $2.45 per share and $6.06 per share, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2018, there was $1.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units that have either time-based vesting or performance vesting. (i) Fair Value The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company determines fair value based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in the principal or most advantageous market. When considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the following fair value hierarchy distinguishes between observable and unobservable inputs, which are categorized in one of the following levels: • Level 1 Inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. • Level 2 Inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuation in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. • Level 3 Inputs: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. All of the Company’s financial instruments are valued using quoted prices in active markets or based on other observable inputs. For accrued interest income, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, the carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2018 and 2017: Fair value measurements at reporting date using December 31, 2018 Level 1 inputs Level 2 inputs Level 3 inputs Assets: Cash equivalents - money market funds and corporate bonds $ 7,331,005 $ 4,835,433 $ 2,495,572 $ - Government treasury bills 897,381 897,381 - - Corporate bonds, notes and commercial paper 6,275,656 - 6,275,656 - $ 14,504,042 $ 5,732,814 $ 8,771,228 $ - Fair value measurements at reporting date using December 31, 2017 Level 1 inputs Level 2 inputs Level 3 inputs Assets: Cash equivalents - money market funds $ 2,171,814 $ 2,171,814 $ - $ - Government bonds and notes 4,741,690 4,741,690 - - Corporate bonds, notes and commercial paper 13,515,631 - 13,515,631 - $ 20,429,135 $ 6,913,504 $ 13,515,631 $ - The following methods and assumptions were used to determine the fair value of each class of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the balance sheets: Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents primarily consist of highly-rated money market funds, commercial paper and treasury bills with original maturities to the Company of three months or less and are purchased daily at par value with specified yield rates. Cash equivalents related to money market funds and treasury bills are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices or broker or dealer quotations for similar assets. Cash equivalents related to commercial paper are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using broker/dealer quotes, bids and offers, benchmark yields and credit spreads and other observable inputs. Government bonds and notes: The Company uses a third-party pricing service to value these investments. United States Treasury bonds and notes are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and reportable trades. Other United States government agency bonds are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using broker/dealer quotes, bids and offers, benchmark yields and credit spreads and other observable inputs. Corporate bonds, notes, and commercial paper: The Company uses a third-party pricing service to value these investments. The pricing service utilizes broker/dealer quotes, bids and offers, benchmark yields and credit spreads and other observable inputs. The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy on the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1 or Level 2 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. (j) Earnings (Loss) per Share Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus, where applicable, the additional potential common shares that would have been outstanding related to dilutive options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock units to the extent such shares are dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Basic loss per share attributable to common stock: Numerator Net loss $ (11,660,022 ) $ (20,982,860 ) $ (18,971,508 ) Denominator Weighted avg. common shares outstanding 21,352,339 20,051,934 18,258,149 Basic loss per share attributable to common stock $ (0.55 ) $ (1.05 ) $ (1.04 ) Diluted loss per share attributable to common stock: Numerator Net loss $ (11,660,022 ) $ (20,982,860 ) $ (18,971,508 ) Denominator Weighted avg. common shares outstanding 21,352,339 20,051,934 18,258,149 Diluted loss per share attributable to common stock $ (0.55 ) $ (1.05 ) $ (1.04 ) The computation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 does not include stock options and unvested restricted stock units to purchase shares in the computation of diluted earnings per share because these instruments were antidilutive: December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Stock options 2,424,617 2,374,449 2,225,850 Unvested restricted stock awards — — — Unvested restricted stock units 682,124 203,998 — (k) Segment Information The Company is a single reportable segment engaged in research and development for the delivery of drugs using its proprietary delivery technology. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The chief operating decision maker made such decisions and assessed performance at the company level, as one segment. (l) Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries. The Company eliminates all intercompany accounts and transactions in consolidation. |