Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from TO
Commission file number 333-180736
ARMORED AUTOGROUP INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | | 27-3620112 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) | | |
44 Old Ridgebury Road, Suite 300 | | |
Danbury, Connecticut | | 06810 |
(Address of principal executive officers) | | (Zip Code) |
(203) 205-2900
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.05 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer o |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer x | | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
The aggregate number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding on November 16, 2012 was 1,000 shares of common stock $.01 par value.
Table of Contents
EXPLANATORY NOTE
On November 14, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) issued an Exemptive Order (Release No. 34-68224) providing regulatory relief to publicly traded companies, investment companies, accountants, transfer agents, and others affected by Hurricane Sandy. The Exemptive Order provides that registrants are exempt from any requirement to file or furnish certain reports, schedules and forms with the Commission under certain reporting provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), for the period from and including October 29, 2012 to November 20, 2012, where certain conditions are satisfied and such reports, schedules or forms are filed on or before November 21, 2012. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012 is being filed on November 19, 2012 in reliance upon the Exemptive Order.
The principal executive offices of Armored AutoGroup Inc (the “Company”) are located in Danbury, Connecticut; an area that was directly affected by Hurricane Sandy. The Company’s finance, accounting and reporting staff are all contained in this location. The Company’s principal executive offices were without electrical power from October 29, 2012 through November 1, 2012 as a result of Hurricane Sandy. Once electrical power was restored, over the next several days, many of the Company’s key accounting and reporting personnel were unable to travel to the office or were only able to work for limited periods during the day before having to return home or address personal or family safety issues because of Hurricane Sandy related damage in their local residential area. In addition, remote access to the Company’s communications and information systems normally available to Company personnel was significantly hampered by widespread power and communication tower outages in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York. During this period, the Company was unable to compile, perform its analytical reviews and procedures and complete the necessary internal processes to finalize information related to its financial statements in a timely manner to allow the Company to file this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q within 45 days after the end of its most recent fiscal quarter.
i
Table of Contents
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, prospects and industry estimates. These statements identify prospective information can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘seeks,’’ ‘‘projects,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will’’ or ‘‘should’’ or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make regarding: (i) our liquidity, including our belief that our existing cash, cash equivalents and anticipated revenues are sufficient to fund our existing operating expenses, capital expenditures and liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months; (ii) our outlook and expectations including, without limitation, statements made regarding continued market expansion and penetration for our products and (iii) expected new product launch dates and market exclusivity periods. The foregoing is not an exclusive list of all forward-looking statements we make. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. The matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report may not in fact occur. We caution you therefore against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory conditions and the following:
· We face intense competition in our business, which could lead to reduced profitability if we cannot compete effectively.
· Harm to our reputation or the reputation of one or more of our leading brands could have an adverse effect on our business.
· Customer support of our marketing and advertising programs and new product launches is critical for our success.
· A significant portion of our net sales and net earnings is derived from a few key customers. The loss of any one or more of these customers could cause a material decline in our operating results.
· Sales growth may be difficult to achieve.
· We may not successfully develop and introduce new products and line extensions.
· Our operating results and net earnings may not meet expectations.
· Acquisitions, new venture investments and divestitures may not be successful.
· Changes in market distributor relationships that are not managed successfully could result in a disruption in one or more of the affected markets.
· Our quarterly results of operations are subject to fluctuations due to the seasonality of our business and other events.
· We are exposed to commodity fluctuation risk and may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure, if at all.
· We may be adversely affected by the current economic environment or future volatility in global economies.
· Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could impact our competitiveness, allow our competitors to develop and market products with features similar to our products and demand for our products could decline.
· If we are found to have infringed the intellectual property rights of others or cannot obtain necessary intellectual property rights from others, our competitiveness could be adversely impacted.
· In the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to product liability claims and lawsuits, including potential class actions, alleging that our products have resulted in or could result in unsafe condition or injury.
· Our dependence upon third parties for the manufacture and supply of a substantial portion of our products could prevent us from delivering our products to our customers in the required quantities or within the required timeframe, which could result in order cancellations and decreased net sales.
1
Table of Contents
· Reliance on a limited base of third party contract manufacturers, logistics and procurement service providers may result in disruption to our business.
· Our facilities and those of our suppliers are subject to disruption by events beyond our control.
· We operate under a Federal Trade Commission consent order, which requires certain compliance policies and procedures. Should we violate our requirements thereunder, we may face significant fines and penalties.
· Compliance with environmental law and other government regulations could impose material costs.
· Operations outside the United States expose us to uncertain conditions and other risks in international markets.
· Because we operate and sell our products in foreign countries, changes in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our operations and financial results.
· We may not be able to hire or retain the number of qualified personnel required for our business, which would harm the development and sales of our products and limit our ability to grow.
· If we lose the services of our key personnel, our business could be adversely affected.
· A failure of a key information technology system could adversely impact our ability to conduct business.
· Our continued growth and expansion and reliance on third-party service providers could adversely affect our internal control over financial reporting, which could harm our business and financial results.
· Our historical financial information may not be representative of our results as a stand-alone company or indicative of our future financial performance.
· Changes in tax laws could adversely affect the taxes we pay and our profitability.
· We may not be able to raise additional funds when needed for our business or to exploit opportunities.
· We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements for which our accounting and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared.
· We may incur increased ongoing costs as a result of being obligated to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives as a public company.
· As an ‘‘emerging growth company’’ under the JOBS Act, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements.
Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Quarterly Report speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
2
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 7,975 | | $ | 4,935 | |
Accounts receivable | | 83,211 | | 54,300 | |
Inventories | | 52,396 | | 37,250 | |
Due from Clorox | | — | | 11,727 | |
Other current assets | | 13,844 | | 9,937 | |
Total current assets | | 157,426 | | 118,149 | |
| | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 31,932 | | 29,905 | |
Goodwill | | 386,943 | | 384,793 | |
Intangible assets | | 362,657 | | 388,175 | |
Deferred financing costs and other assets | | 5,473 | | 6,454 | |
Total assets | | $ | 944,431 | | $ | 927,476 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Book overdraft | | $ | — | | $ | 1,987 | |
Accounts payable | | 13,820 | | 8,606 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | 40,862 | | 22,614 | |
Income taxes payable | | — | | 1,821 | |
Due to Parent | | 795 | | 795 | |
Due to Clorox | | 186 | | — | |
Revolving credit loan | | 13,001 | | — | |
Current portion of long-term debt, less discount | | 329 | | 470 | |
Total current liabilities | | 68,993 | | 36,293 | |
| | | | | |
Long-term debt, less discount and current portion | | 553,630 | | 553,861 | |
Other liability | | 2,500 | | 2,500 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 109,057 | | 116,489 | |
Total liabilities | | 734,180 | | 709,143 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) | | | | | |
Shareholder’s Equity: | | | | | |
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | | — | | — | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 260,671 | | 260,484 | |
Accumulated deficit | | (52,553 | ) | (39,784 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | 2,133 | | (2,367 | ) |
Total shareholder’s equity | | 210,251 | | 218,333 | |
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity | | $ | 944,431 | | $ | 927,476 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 68,348 | | $ | 61,826 | | $ | 237,439 | | $ | 221,808 | |
Cost of products sold | | 39,728 | | 33,814 | | 126,948 | | 115,086 | |
Cost of products sold - acquisition related | | — | | — | | — | | 4,439 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 28,620 | | 28,012 | | 110,491 | | 102,283 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 10,828 | | 8,304 | | 34,935 | | 28,033 | |
Advertising costs | | 7,929 | | 4,149 | | 27,414 | | 22,823 | |
Research and development costs | | 661 | | 397 | | 1,700 | | 1,807 | |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | 9,175 | | 9,175 | | 27,526 | | 27,526 | |
Acquisition-related charges | | — | | 45 | | — | | 994 | |
Total operating expenses | | 28,593 | | 22,070 | | 91,575 | | 81,183 | |
Operating profit | | 27 | | 5,942 | | 18,916 | | 21,100 | |
Non-operating expenses (income): | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 12,406 | | 12,048 | | 36,829 | | 35,981 | |
Other expense, net | | 123 | | 550 | | 166 | | 280 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss before benefit for income taxes | | (12,502 | ) | (6,656 | ) | (18,079 | ) | (15,161 | ) |
Benefit for income taxes | | (2,729 | ) | (3,100 | ) | (5,309 | ) | (6,429 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (9,773 | ) | $ | (3,556 | ) | $ | (12,770 | ) | $ | (8,732 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) | | 3,985 | | (7,998 | ) | 4,500 | | (3,818 | ) |
Comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (5,788 | ) | $ | (11,554 | ) | $ | (8,270 | ) | $ | (12,550 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
| | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,770 | ) | $ | (8,732 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 35,089 | | 33,550 | |
Share-based compensation | | 199 | | 199 | |
Deferred income taxes | | (7,614 | ) | (11,250 | ) |
Other | | 141 | | 233 | |
Cash effect of changes in: | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | (28,911 | ) | (18,872 | ) |
Inventories | | (15,146 | ) | (10,143 | ) |
Due from Clorox | | 11,913 | | (8,007 | ) |
Other current assets | | (2,025 | ) | 874 | |
Book overdraft | | (1,987 | ) | — | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 23,462 | | 13,299 | |
Income taxes | | (3,172 | ) | 1,666 | |
Other | | 97 | | 0 | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | (724 | ) | (7,183 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | (6,718 | ) | (8,213 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (6,718 | ) | (8,213 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Borrowings under revolver | | 46,001 | | 21,500 | |
Payments on revolver | | (33,000 | ) | (21,500 | ) |
Principle payments on term loan | | (2,250 | ) | (2,250 | ) |
Advance from Parent | | — | | 795 | |
Deferred financing costs | | (350 | ) | (670 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 10,401 | | (2,125 | ) |
| | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | 81 | | 333 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | | 3,040 | | (17,188 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | | 4,935 | | 31,701 | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 7,975 | | $ | 14,513 | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 27,632 | | $ | 23,369 | |
Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | 7,791 | | $ | 1,681 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The Company
Armored AutoGroup Inc. is a consumer products company consisting primarily of Armor All® and STP®, two of the most recognizable brands in the automotive aftermarket appearance products and performance products categories, respectively. Armored AutoGroup delivers its products to distributors, resellers and end users (collectively the customers) through its direct operations in the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom and distributor relationships in approximately 50 countries. The Armor All and STP brands offer multiple automotive appearance and performance products that can be found in most of the major developed countries around the world.
On November 5, 2010, affiliates of Avista Capital Holdings, L.P. (“Avista”) acquired the Armor All, STP and certain other brands from The Clorox Company (“Clorox”) pursuant to the terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 21, 2010 (the “Acquisition”). Armored AutoGroup Parent Inc. (“AAG Parent” or “Parent”) indirectly owns all of AAG’s issued and outstanding capital stock through its direct subsidiary and AAG’s direct parent, Armored AutoGroup Intermediate Inc. (“Intermediate”).
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented. The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ materially from the estimates and assumptions made. Further, the results for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, or for any future period.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted or condensed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information in this report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-180736) filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, which includes a complete set of footnote disclosures, including the Company’s significant accounting policies. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the financial information or disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
Subsequent to the Acquisition, Clorox provided certain significant services to the Company under a Transition Services Agreement (“TSA”). On November 1, 2011, the Company completed the transition of its North American and export operations from Clorox provisioning to stand-alone operations. The Company completed the transition of certain international operations from Clorox in the second quarter of 2012 and terminated the remaining service components of the TSA.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications included separately stating interest expense of $12,048,000 and $35,981,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income which was previously included in interest and other expense, net and separately stating the change in the amount due from Clorox of $8,007,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows which was previously included in other current assets. These reclassifications did not change the previously reported net loss of the Company.
6
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Revenue Recognition
Sales are recognized as revenue when the risk of loss and title pass to the customer and when all of the following have occurred: a firm sales arrangement exists, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Sales are recorded net of allowances for returns, trade-promotions, coupons and other discounts. The Company commits to one-time or ongoing trade-promotion programs with customers and consumer coupon programs that require the Company to estimate and accrue the expected costs of such programs. Programs include cooperative marketing programs, shelf price reductions, advantageous end-of-aisle or in-store displays of the Company’s products, graphics and other trade-promotion activities conducted by the customer. Coupons are recognized as a liability when distributed based upon expected consumer redemptions. The Company maintains liabilities at the end of each period for the estimated expenses incurred, but unpaid for these programs.
The Company’s business is moderately seasonal. Sales are typically higher in the first half of the calendar year as customers purchase stock for the spring and summer seasons when weather is warmer in the northern hemisphere than in the fall and winter months. This pattern is largely reflective of customers’ seasonal purchasing patterns, as well as the timing of Company promotional activities. Weather can also influence consumer behavior, especially for appearance products. Armor All and STP automotive appearance and performance products sell best during warm, dry weather, and sell less strongly if weather is cold and wet.
Cost of Products Sold
Cost of products sold is primarily comprised of direct materials and supplies consumed in the manufacturing of product, as well as manufacturing labor, depreciation expense, direct overhead expense necessary to acquire and convert the purchased materials and supplies into finished product, contract manufacturing costs, and provisions for inventory losses (including losses on the disposition of excess and obsolete inventory). Cost of products sold also includes the cost to distribute products to customers, inbound freight costs, internal transfer costs, warehousing costs and other shipping and handling activity. The costs associated with developing and designing new packaging are expensed as incurred and include design, artwork, films, and labeling.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. For purposes of unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company’s calculates tax with reference to the anticipated effective benefit rate for the annual financial period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the anticipated future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement amounts and their respective tax bases. Management reviews the Company’s deferred tax assets to determine whether their value can be realized based upon available evidence. A valuation allowance is established when management believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the Company’s tax provision in the period of change. In addition to valuation allowances, the Company provides for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards prescribed by accounting guidance on the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled.
7
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Foreign Currency Translation
Local currencies are the functional currencies for substantially all of the Company’s foreign operations. When the transactional currency is different than the functional currency, transaction gains and losses are included as a component of other expense (income), net. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the respective balance sheet reporting date. Income and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the period. For purposes of these financial statements, currency translation adjustments were allocated based on net assets subject to translation. Gains and losses on foreign currency translations are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Deferred taxes are not provided on cumulative translation adjustments where the Company expects earnings of a foreign subsidiary to be indefinitely reinvested. The income tax effect of currency translation adjustments related to foreign subsidiaries in certain countries that are not considered indefinitely reinvested is recorded as a component of deferred taxes with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company tests its goodwill, trademarks with indefinite lives and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually on the first day of the fourth quarter unless there are indications during an interim period that these assets are more likely than not to have become impaired.
The first step of the goodwill impairment test is to compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit (including unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step of the goodwill impairment test is inherently subjective in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions based on known facts and circumstances at the time the Company performs the valuation. The use of different assumptions, inputs and judgments or changes in circumstances could materially affect the results of the valuation and could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and the magnitude of any such charge.
For trademarks and other intangible assets with indefinite lives, impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset is greater than its estimated fair value. The determination of the fair values of trademarks and other intangible assets with indefinite lives requires significant judgments in determining both the assets’ estimated cash flows as well as the appropriate discount and royalty rates applied to those cash flows to determine fair value. Changes in such estimates or the application of alternative assumptions could produce different results.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June and December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance on the presentation of other comprehensive income (“OCI”). This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and also requires presentation of reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with the exception of the requirement to present reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the financial statements, which has been deferred pending further deliberation by the FASB. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2012 and the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”) to amend the requirement for an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2011-11 on January 1, 2013, as required, but does not believe this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
During July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2012-02 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”) which is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of performing an impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets by simplifying how the Company tests those assets for impairment and to improve consistency in impairment testing guidance among long-lived asset categories. Under ASU 2012-02, the Company has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. The Company also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. The Company will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2012-02 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
Note 2 — Related-Party Transactions
Clorox
In conjunction with the Acquisition, the Company entered into a TSA with Clorox whereby Clorox would provide certain services, equipment and office space to the Company. Additionally under the TSA, the Company provided certain services to Clorox. Related-party transactions and activities involving Clorox are not always consummated on terms equivalent to those that would prevail in an arm’s-length transaction where conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may exist. On November 1, 2011, the Company completed the transition of its North American and export operations from Clorox provisioning to stand-alone operations. The Company completed the transition of certain international operations from Clorox in the second quarter of 2012 and terminated the remaining service components of the TSA..
Net expenses under the TSA were (in thousands):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
Cost of products sold | | $ | — | | $ | 1,820 | | $ | — | | $ | 5,987 | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 45 | | 487 | | 732 | | 3,053 | |
Research and development costs | | — | | — | | — | | 621 | |
| | $ | 45 | | $ | 2,307 | | $ | 732 | | $ | 9,661 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Avista
Avista and several of its employees together own approximately 99.3% of Parent, which is the sole stockholder of Intermediate, the Company’s parent. As a result, Avista has the power to elect our board of directors and has the ability to exercise significant influence or control over the Company’s operations.
The Company has entered into a monitoring agreement with Avista and affiliates of Avista whereby Avista provides services for a fixed fee to the Company. Selling and administrative expenses, including out of pocket expenses, respectively, related to this monitoring agreement were (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
$ | 250 | | $ | 327 | | $ | 851 | | $ | 827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
9
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
In connection with the Acquisition and the issuance of its long-term debt, the Company paid $4,050,000 to Avista and affiliates of Avista for consulting expenses and recorded these as deferred financing costs which are amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest rate method. Related amortization expense was (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
$ | 152 | | $ | 152 | | $ | 453 | | $ | 453 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Directors and Officers
In connection with the Acquisition and issuance of the Company’s long-term debt, the Company incurred costs of $1,800,000 for consulting expenses from individuals that later became directors and officers of the Company. Of this amount, $400,000 was paid to certain directors and officers of the Company and $1,400,000 was reinvested in the Company through the purchase of common stock. Deferred financing costs of $457,000 for consulting expenses provided by individuals that later became directors and officers of the Company were recorded in connection with the issuance of the Company’s long-term debt and are amortized over the term of the respective debt using the effective interest method. Related amortization expense was (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
$ | 17 | | $ | 17 | | $ | 51 | | $ | 51 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Parent
In May 2011, the Company received $795,000 on behalf of its Parent related to the sale of the Parent’s stock to certain of the Company’s employees. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company had $795,000 due to the Company’s Parent related to sales of the Parent’s stock to the Company’s employees.
Note 3 — Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | |
Finished goods | | $ | 41,738 | | $ | 30,814 | |
Raw materials and packaging | | 12,983 | | 8,487 | |
Allowances for obsolescence | | (2,325 | ) | (2,051 | ) |
| | $ | 52,396 | | $ | 37,250 | |
A step-up in the value of inventory of $11,668,000 was recorded in connection with the Acquisition based on valuation estimates. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $4,439,000 of this step-up amount was charged to “cost of products sold — acquisition related” as the inventory was sold.
10
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note 4 — Debt
In September 2012, the Company entered into an amendment of its credit agreement, dated November 5, 2010, among Armored Auto Group Intermediate Inc. (f/k/a Viking Intermediate Inc.), the Company, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other agents parties thereto (as amended, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Facility”) revising the maximum consolidated leverage ratio and the minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio as applicable to the Company’s $50 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”). Costs associated with the amendment of $350,000 have been deferred and are recorded as other current assets and other non-current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, and will be amortized to interest expense together with other of the Company’s deferred financing costs using the effective interest method.
Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities
The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value which is intended to increase consistency and comparability and related disclosures. An asset or liability’s classification is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement and is disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
The carrying and fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
| | September 30, 2012, | | December 31, 2011, | |
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |
Revolver | | $ | 13,001 | | $ | 13,001 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Term loan | | 287,755 | | 294,013 | | 288,889 | | 288,889 | |
Senior notes | | 266,204 | | 246,125 | | 265,442 | | 212,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The carrying value of the Company’s Revolver approximates its fair value at September 30, 2012 essentially due to its variable rate of interest. The fair value of the senior secured term loan and the $275,000,000 aggregate principal amount of our 9.25% senior notes due 2018 (the “Senior Notes”) was determined using broker quotes, which use discounted cash flows, an income approach, and the then-applicable forward LIBOR rates and, therefore, meets the definition of Level 2 fair value, as defined above.
Note 6 — Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation and Other Legal Matters
In connection with the Acquisition, Clorox retained liability associated with a potential contract claim and the Company agreed to indemnify and reimburse Clorox for 50% of the first $5,000,000 in settlement costs related to the contract claim. As of both December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, the Company has accrued $2,500,000 in long-term liabilities related to this contingency.
The Company is subject to various lawsuits and claims relating to issues such as contract disputes, product liability, patents and trademarks, advertising, employee and other matters. Although the results of claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these matters, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s financial statements taken as a whole.
11
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note 7 — Segment Data
The Company manages its business through two geographic segments: North America and International.
· North America consists of auto-care products marketed and sold in the United States and Canada. Products within this segment include auto-care products primarily under the Armor All® and STP® brands.
· International consists of products sold outside North America. Products within this segment include auto-care products primarily under the Armor All and STP, brands.
The following summarizes the financial performance of the Company’s operating segments (in thousands):
| | Three months ended September 30, 2012 | |
| | North America | | International | | Corporate | | Consolidated | |
Net sales | | $ | 50,062 | | $ | 18,286 | | $ | — | | $ | 68,348 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes | | 6,664 | | 2,415 | | (21,581 | ) | (12,502 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | 1,109 | | 446 | | — | | 1,556 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 1,578 | | 101 | | 9,175 | | 11,876 | |
Share-based compensation | | 65 | | 3 | | — | | 68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, 2011 | |
| | North America | | International | | Corporate | | Consolidated | |
Net sales | | $ | 44,923 | | $ | 16,903 | | $ | — | | $ | 61,826 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes | | 12,616 | | 3,048 | | (22,320 | ) | (6,656 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | 3,399 | | 6 | | — | | 3,405 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 1,901 | | 115 | | 9,176 | | 11,192 | |
Share-based compensation | | 61 | | 2 | | — | | 63 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine months ended September 30, 2012 | |
| | North America | | International | | Corporate | | Consolidated | |
Net sales | | $ | 183,325 | | $ | 54,114 | | $ | — | | $ | 237,439 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes | | 39,708 | | 6,568 | | (64,355 | ) | (18,079 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | 6,131 | | 586 | | — | | 6,718 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 4,130 | | 422 | | 27,526 | | 35,089 | |
Share-based compensation | | 191 | | 8 | | — | | 199 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine months ended September 30, 2011 | |
| | North America | | International | | Corporate | | Consolidated | |
Net sales | | $ | 169,426 | | $ | 52,382 | | $ | — | | $ | 221,808 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes | | 48,425 | | 8,543 | | (72,129 | ) | (15,161 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | 7,756 | | 457 | | — | | 8,213 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 5,671 | | 353 | | 27,526 | | 33,550 | |
Share-based compensation | | 192 | | 7 | | — | | 199 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The Company does not allocate its cost of products sold — acquisition related, acquisition-related charges, amortization of intangible assets or interest expense between its North America and International segments but includes them in the tables above under Corporate in order to reconcile the North America and International segments’ performance to the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. All intersegment sales are eliminated and are not included in the Company’s reportable segments’ net sales.
Total assets of the Company’s North American and International operating segments, which do not include goodwill or intangible assets, were $161,896,000 and $32,936,000, respectively, as of September 30, 2012 and $127,405,000 and $27,103,000, respectively, adjusted as of December 31, 2011.
Note 8 — Income taxes
The Company’s effective benefit rate in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 21.8% and 46.5%, respectively, and in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 29.4% and 42.4%, respectively. The Company’s effective benefit rate for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 reflects the anticipated effective benefit rate for 2012, which will differ from the statutory tax rate primarily due to the effect of additional expense for adjustments to state deferred taxes to reflect expectations of geographic earnings in the U.S.offset by the effect of U.S. federal manufacturing benefits expected for 2012 and the impact of foreign earnings taxed below the U.S. federal rate which increases the benefit rate on the anticipated loss for 2012.
The Company’s effective benefit rate for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 differed from the statutory tax rate primarily due to U.S. federal manufacturing benefits recognized during the period, which increased the benefit rate on the loss for the quarter. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, the Company determined that the actual tax expense for the period represented the best estimate of the tax provision for the year to date, in lieu of the general effective rate model.
Note 9 — Financial Information for the Company and Its Subsidiaries
The Company’s payment obligations under the Senior Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by all of the Company’s wholly owned domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the obligations of the Company under the Credit Facility. These guarantees are full and unconditional, subject, in the case of the subsidiary guarantors, to customary release provisions. The Company conducts substantially all of its business through its subsidiaries. In servicing payments to be made on the Senior Notes and other indebtedness, and to satisfy other liquidity requirements, the Company will rely, in large part, on cash flows from these subsidiaries, mainly in the form of dividends, royalties and advances or payments on account of intercompany loan arrangements. The ability of these subsidiaries to make dividend payments to the Company will be affected by, among other factors, the obligations of these entities to their creditors, requirements of corporate and other law, and restrictions contained in agreements entered into by or relating to these entities.
The following supplemental condensed combining financial information sets forth, on a combining basis, balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of comprehensive (loss) income for the Company, the guarantor subsidiaries, the non-guarantor subsidiaries and elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Company and its subsidiaries. This information is presented in lieu of separate financial statements and other related disclosures pursuant to Regulation S-X Rule 3-10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, ‘‘Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.’’
The comparative Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011 has been adjusted to report intangible brand assets in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries with no effect on total assets or shareholder’s equity of the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011. However, the adjustment did decrease the total assets and Shareholder’s equity of the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries by $22,297,000 as of December 31, 2011. The adjustment has no impact on the comprehensive income of the Issuer, Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries or Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.
13
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The operating and investing activities of the separate legal entities are fully interdependent and integrated. Accordingly, the results of the separate legal entities are not representative of what the operating results would be on a stand-alone basis.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2011
| | Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantors Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 4,935 | | $ | — | | $ | 4,935 | |
Receivables, net | | 766 | | 42,421 | | 11,113 | | — | | 54,300 | |
Inventories, net | | — | | 29,364 | | 7,886 | | — | | 37,250 | |
Due from Clorox | | (244 | ) | 11,433 | | 538 | | — | | 11,727 | |
Other current assets | | 7,370 | | 542 | | 2,025 | | — | | 9,937 | |
Total current assets | | 7,892 | | 83,760 | | 26,497 | | — | | 118,149 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | 9,102 | | 17,994 | | 2,809 | | — | | 29,905 | |
Goodwill | | — | | 310,576 | | 74,217 | | — | | 384,793 | |
Intangible assets, net | | — | | 336,378 | | 51,574 | | 223 | | 388,175 | |
Investment in subsidiaries | | 741,781 | | 149,489 | | — | | (891,270 | ) | — | |
Other assets | | 6,450 | | — | | 4 | | — | | 6,454 | |
Total assets | | $ | 765,225 | | $ | 898,197 | | $ | 155,101 | | $ | (891,047 | ) | $ | 927,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and equity | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Book overdraft | | $ | 1,987 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 1,987 | |
Accounts payable | | 2,519 | | 4,419 | | 1,668 | | — | | 8,606 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | 13,651 | | 5,097 | | 3,866 | | — | | 22,614 | |
Payable to parent company | | 795 | | — | | — | | — | | 795 | |
Notes payable, current portion | | 470 | | — | | — | | — | | 470 | |
Income taxes payable | | (33,788 | ) | 35,531 | | 78 | | — | | 1,821 | |
Total current liabilities | | (14,366 | ) | 45,047 | | 5,612 | | | | 36,293 | |
Long-term debt, less discount and current portion | | 553,861 | | — | | — | | — | | 553,861 | |
Other liabilities | | 2,500 | | — | | — | | — | | 2,500 | |
Deferred tax liability-LT | | 5,120 | | 111,369 | | — | | — | | 116,489 | |
Total liabilities | | 547,115 | | 156,416 | | 5,612 | | | | 709,143 | |
Shareholder’s Equity | | | 218,110 | | | 741,781 | | | 149,489 | | | (891,047 | ) | | 218,333 | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 765,225 | | $ | 898,197 | | $ | 155,101 | | $ | (891,047 | ) | $ | 927,476 | |
14
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2012
| | Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantors Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 4,686 | | $ | — | | $ | 3,289 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,975 | |
Accounts Receivable | | 67 | | 64,545 | | 18,599 | | — | | 83,211 | |
Inventories | | — | | 39,947 | | 12,449 | | — | | 52,396 | |
Due from Clorox | | 71 | | 173 | | (244 | ) | — | | — | |
Other current assets | | 9,751 | | 942 | | 3,151 | | — | | 13,844 | |
Total current assets | | 14,575 | | 105,607 | | 37,244 | | — | | 157,426 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 10,568 | | 18,625 | | 2,739 | | — | | 31,932 | |
Goodwill | | — | | 310,576 | | 76,367 | | — | | 386,943 | |
Intangible assets | | — | | 314,947 | | 48,089 | | (379 | ) | 362,657 | |
Investment in subsidiaries | | 714,435 | | 149,375 | | — | | (863,810 | ) | — | |
Deferred financing costs | | 5,396 | | 77 | | — | | — | | 5,473 | |
Total assets | | $ | 744,974 | | $ | 899,207 | | $ | 164,439 | | $ | (864,189 | ) | $ | 944,431 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 2,078 | | $ | 6,996 | | $ | 4,746 | | $ | — | | $ | 13,820 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | 18,657 | | 13,622 | | 8,583 | | — | | 40,862 | |
Payable to parent company | | 795 | | — | | — | | — | | 795 | |
Due to Clorox | | 186 | | — | | — | | — | | 186 | |
Current portion of long-term debt, less discount | | 13,001 | | — | | — | | — | | 13,001 | |
Discount on notes payable - ST | | 329 | | — | | — | | — | | 329 | |
Income taxes payable | | (59,427 | ) | 59,244 | | 183 | | — | | — | |
Total current liabilities | | (24,381 | ) | 79,862 | | 13,512 | | — | | 68,993 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less discount and current portion | | 553,630 | | — | | — | | — | | 553,630 | |
Other liability | | 2,500 | | — | | — | | — | | 2,500 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 2,591 | | 104,913 | | 1,553 | | — | | 109,057 | |
Total liabilities | | 534,340 | | 184,775 | | 15,065 | | — | | 734,180 | |
Total shareholder’s equity | | 210,634 | | 714,432 | | 149,374 | | (864,189 | ) | 210,251 | |
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity | | $ | 744,974 | | $ | 899,207 | | $ | 164,439 | | $ | (864,189 | ) | $ | 944,431 | |
15
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three months ended September 30, 2012
| | Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | — | | $ | 56,507 | | $ | 19,168 | | $ | (7,327 | ) | $ | 68,348 | |
Cost of products sold | | — | | 34,193 | | 12,862 | | (7,327 | ) | 39,728 | |
Gross profit | | — | | 22,314 | | 6,306 | | — | | 28,620 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 5,679 | | 2,377 | | 2,772 | | — | | 10,828 | |
Advertising costs | | — | | 6,216 | | 1,713 | | — | | 7,929 | |
Research and development costs | | — | | 661 | | — | | — | | 661 | |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | — | | 7,547 | | 1628 | | — | | 9,175 | |
Total operating expenses | | 5,679 | | 16,801 | | 6113 | | — | | 28,593 | |
Operating (loss) profit | | (5,679 | ) | 5,513 | | 193 | | — | | 27 | |
Non-operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 12,406 | | — | | — | | — | | 12,406 | |
Other expense and (income), net | | — | | 28 | | 95 | | — | | 123 | |
(Loss) earnings before income taxes | | (18,085 | ) | 5,485 | | 98 | | — | | (12,502 | ) |
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | | (7,918 | ) | 5,189 | | — | | — | | (2,729 | ) |
Equity earnings (loss) of subsidiaries, net of taxes | | 394 | | 94 | | — | | (488 | ) | — | |
Net (loss) earnings | | $ | (9,773 | ) | $ | 390 | | $ | 98 | | $ | (488 | ) | $ | (9,773 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation gain | | 4,078 | | 4,078 | | 4,078 | | (8,249 | ) | 3,985 | |
Comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (5,695 | ) | $ | 4,468 | | $ | 4,176 | | $ | (8,737 | ) | $ | (5,788 | ) |
16
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three months ended September 30, 2011
| | Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | — | | $ | 50,008 | | $ | 18,017 | | $ | (6,199 | ) | $ | 61,826 | |
Cost of products sold | | — | | 26,950 | | 13,063 | | (6,199 | ) | 33,814 | |
Gross profit | | — | | 23,058 | | 4,954 | | — | | 28,012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 3,540 | | 2,024 | | 2,740 | | — | | 8,304 | |
Advertising costs | | — | | 2,575 | | 1,574 | | — | | 4,149 | |
Research and development costs | | — | | 397 | | — | | — | | 397 | |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | — | | 7,320 | | 1,855 | | — | | 9,175 | |
Acquisition-realted charges | | 45 | | — | | — | | — | | 45 | |
Total operating expenses | | 3,585 | | 12,316 | | 6,169 | | — | | 22,070 | |
Operating (loss) profit | | (3,585 | ) | 10,742 | | (1,215 | ) | — | | 5,942 | |
Non-operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 12,059 | | — | | (11 | ) | — | | 12,048 | |
Other expense (income), net | | — | | — | | 550 | | — | | 550 | |
(Loss) earnings before income taxes | | (15,644 | ) | 10,742 | | (1,754 | ) | — | | (6,656 | ) |
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | | (6,827 | ) | 3,896 | | (169 | ) | — | | (3,100 | ) |
Equity earnings (loss) of subsidiaries, net of taxes | | 5,261 | | (1,585 | ) | — | | (3,676 | ) | — | |
Net (loss) earnings | | $ | (3,556 | ) | $ | 5,261 | | $ | (1,585 | ) | $ | (3,676 | ) | $ | (3,556 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) | | (9,062 | ) | (9,062 | ) | (9,062 | ) | 19,188 | | (7,998 | ) |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | (12,618 | ) | $ | (3,801 | ) | $ | (10,647 | ) | $ | 15,512 | | $ | (11,554 | ) |
17
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Nine months ended September 30, 2012
| | Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 154 | | $ | 200,893 | | $ | 60,584 | | $ | (24,192 | ) | $ | 237,439 | |
Cost of products sold | | — | | 109,187 | | 41,953 | | (24,192 | ) | 126,948 | |
Gross profit | | 154 | | 91,706 | | 18,631 | | — | | 110,491 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 17,378 | | 9,950 | | 7,607 | | — | | 34,935 | |
Advertising costs | | — | | 21,842 | | 5,572 | | — | | 27,414 | |
Research and development costs | | — | | 1,700 | | — | | — | | 1,700 | |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | — | | 22,637 | | 4,889 | | — | | 27,526 | |
Total operating expenses | | 17,378 | | 56,129 | | 18,068 | | — | | 91,575 | |
Operating (loss) profit | | (17,224 | ) | 35,577 | | 563 | | — | | 18,916 | |
Non-operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 36,829 | | — | | — | | — | | 36,829 | |
Other expense (income), net | | — | | 30 | | 136 | | — | | 166 | |
(Loss) earnings before income taxes | | (54,053 | ) | 35,547 | | 427 | | — | | (18,079 | ) |
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | | (23,665 | ) | 18,401 | | (45 | ) | — | | (5,309 | ) |
Equity earnings (loss) of subsidiaries, net of taxes | | 17,618 | | 468 | | — | | (18,086 | ) | — | |
Net (loss) earnings | | $ | (12,770 | ) | $ | 17,614 | | $ | 472 | | $ | (18,086 | ) | $ | (12,770 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) | | 4,723 | | 4,723 | | 4,723 | | (9,223 | ) | 4,500 | |
Comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (8,047 | ) | $ | 22,337 | | $ | 5,195 | | $ | (27,309 | ) | $ | (8,270 | ) |
18
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Nine months ended September 30, 2011
| | Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | — | | $ | 182,478 | | $ | 61,664 | | $ | (22,334 | ) | $ | 221,808 | |
Cost of products sold | | — | | 94,075 | | 43,345 | | (22,334 | ) | 115,086 | |
Cost of products sold - acquisition related | | — | | 4,439 | | — | | — | | 4,439 | |
Gross profit | | — | | 83,964 | | 18,319 | | — | | 102,283 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 13,151 | | 6,352 | | 8,530 | | — | | 28,033 | |
Advertising costs | | — | | 17,123 | | 5,700 | | — | | 22,823 | |
Research and development costs | | — | | 1,807 | | — | | — | | 1,807 | |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | — | | 22,411 | | 5,115 | | — | | 27,526 | |
Acquisition-realted charges | | 994 | | — | | — | | — | | 994 | |
Total operating expenses | | 14,145 | | 47,693 | | 19,345 | | — | | 81,183 | |
Operating (loss) profit | | (14,145 | ) | 36,271 | | (1,026 | ) | — | | 21,100 | |
Non-operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 35,924 | | — | | 57 | | — | | 35,981 | |
Other expense (income), net | | 4 | | — | | 276 | | — | | 280 | |
(Loss) earnings before income taxes | | (50,073 | ) | 36,271 | | (1,359 | ) | — | | (15,161 | ) |
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | | (19,470 | ) | 12,615 | | 426 | | — | | (6,429 | ) |
Equity earnings (loss) of subsidiaries, net of taxes | | 21,871 | | (1,785 | ) | — | | (20,086 | ) | — | |
Net (loss) earnings | | $ | (8,732 | ) | $ | 21,871 | | $ | (1,785 | ) | $ | (20,086 | ) | $ | (8,732 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) | | (4,390 | ) | (4,390 | ) | (4,390 | ) | (9,352 | ) | (3,818 | ) |
Comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (13,122 | ) | $ | 17,481 | | $ | (6,175 | ) | $ | (10,734 | ) | $ | (12,550 | ) |
19
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine months ended September 30, 2012
| | Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) earninings | | $ | (12,770 | ) | $ | 17,614 | | $ | 472 | | $ | (18,086 | ) | $ | (12,770 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 4,521 | | 29,502 | | 1,066 | | — | | 35,089 | |
Share-based compensation | | 199 | | — | | — | | — | | 199 | |
Deferred income taxes | | (2,533 | ) | (6,456 | ) | 1,375 | | — | | (7,614 | ) |
Equity earnings of subsidiaries, net of taxes | | (17,614 | ) | (472 | ) | — | | 18,086 | | — | |
Other | | — | | 141 | | — | | — | | 141 | |
Cash effects of changes, net of acquisition effects in: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 699 | | (22,124 | ) | (7,486 | ) | — | | (28,911 | ) |
Inventories | | — | | (10,583 | ) | (4,563 | ) | — | | (15,146 | ) |
Due from Clorox | | (129 | ) | 11,260 | | 782 | | — | | 11,913 | |
Other current assets | | (421 | ) | (477 | ) | (1,127 | ) | — | | (2,025 | ) |
Book overdraft | | (1,987 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (1,987 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 4,561 | | 11,102 | | 7,799 | | — | | 23,462 | |
Intercompany receivable / payable | | 49,254 | | (45,128 | ) | (3,627 | ) | (402 | ) | 97 | |
Income taxes | | (26,990 | ) | 23,713 | | 105 | | — | | (3,172 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | (3,210 | ) | 8,092 | | (5,204 | ) | (402 | ) | (724 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | (3,110 | ) | (3,334 | ) | (274 | ) | — | | (6,718 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (3,110 | ) | (3,334 | ) | (274 | ) | — | | (6,718 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payments on Revolver | | (33,000 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (33,000 | ) |
Borrowings under Revolver | | 46,001 | | — | | — | | — | | 46,001 | |
Principle payments on term loan | | (2,250 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (2,250 | ) |
Deferred financing costs | | (350 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (350 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | 10,401 | | — | | — | | — | | 10,401 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | 603 | | (4,758 | ) | 3,834 | | 402 | | 81 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | | 4,684 | | — | | (1,644 | ) | — | | 3,040 | |
Cash at beginning of period | | — | | — | | 4,935 | | — | | 4,935 | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 4,684 | | $ | — | | $ | 3,291 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,975 | |
20
Table of Contents
Armored AutoGroup Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine months ended September 30, 2011
| | Parent Issuer | | Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Combined Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Total Consolidated | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) | | $ | (8,732 | ) | $ | 21,871 | | $ | (1,785 | ) | $ | (20,086 | ) | $ | (8,732 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 3,038 | | 24,761 | | 5,751 | | — | | 33,550 | |
Share-based compensation | | 199 | | — | | — | | — | | 199 | |
Deferred income taxes | | (121 | ) | (10,732 | ) | (397 | ) | — | | (11,250 | ) |
Restructuring | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Equity earnings of subsidiaries, net of taxes | | (21,871 | ) | 1,785 | | — | | 20,086 | | | |
Other | | — | | 233 | | — | | — | | 233 | |
Cash effects of changes, net of acquisition effects in: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receivables, net | | (412 | ) | (15,752 | ) | (2,708 | ) | — | | (18,872 | ) |
Inventory | | — | | (11,222 | ) | 1,079 | | — | | (10,143 | ) |
Other current assets | | (2,179 | ) | (2,729 | ) | (2,225 | ) | — | | (7,133 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 15,352 | | (2,790 | ) | 737 | | — | | 13,299 | |
Intercompany receivable / payable | | (5,184 | ) | (4,598 | ) | 11,206 | | (1,424 | ) | — | |
Income taxes payable | | 3,094 | | 684 | | (2,112 | ) | — | | 1,666 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | (16,816 | ) | 1,511 | | 9,546 | | (1,424 | ) | (7,183 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | (6,522 | ) | (1,011 | ) | (680 | ) | — | | (8,213 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (6,522 | ) | (1,011 | ) | (680 | ) | — | | (8,213 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal payments on notes payable | | (23,750 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (23,750 | ) |
Borrowings under term loan facility, net of discount | | 21,500 | | — | | — | | — | | 21,500 | |
Debt financing costs | | (670 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (670 | ) |
Advance from parent | | 795 | | — | | — | | — | | 795 | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (2,125 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (2,125 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | (294 | ) | (500 | ) | (297 | ) | 1,424 | | 333 | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash | | (25,757 | ) | — | | 8,569 | | — | | (17,188 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | | 29,966 | | — | | 1,735 | | — | | 31,701 | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 4,209 | | $ | — | | $ | 10,304 | | $ | — | | $ | 14,513 | |
21
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the factors we describe under “Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements,” “Risk factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Overview
We are a consumer products company consisting primarily of Armor All® and STP®, two of the most recognizable brands in the automotive aftermarket appearance products and performance products categories, respectively. Both brands have leading category shares in the United States, with Armor All having a #1 value share of market in the appearance products category and STP a #3 value share of market in the performance products category, in each case, based on sales volumes in U.S. dollars in approximately the year-ending December 31, 2011 as measured by NPD Group, Inc. and Nielsen Holdings, N.V. (“Nielsen”), our primary sources for U.S. third-party industry data and forecasts. We believe there has been no significant change in our rankings since December 31, 2011. Armor All’s current product line of protectants, wipes, tire and wheel care products, glass cleaners, leather care products and washes is designed to clean, shine and protect interior and exterior automobile surfaces. STP’s offering of oil and fuel additives, functional fluids and automotive appearance products has a broad customer base ranging from professional racers to car enthusiasts and “Do-it-Yourselfers.” Our brands offer multiple automotive appearance and performance products that can be found in most of the major developed countries around the world. We have a diversified geographic footprint with direct operations in the United States, Canada, Australia, Mexico and the U.K. and distributor relationships in approximately 50 countries.
Armor All is the most recognized automotive aftermarket appearance product brand in the United States with a comprehensive and competitively priced product line. Armor All’s advertising campaigns, such as the “Go ahead. Stare,” “Care for your car” and the new “Armor All Way,” build on Armor All’s strong brand equity established over its 50 year history to maintain a high level of consumer awareness. We further believe that Armor All has distinguished itself as the leader in the automotive aftermarket appearance products category based upon its household name, high-quality product formulations, convenient application methods and tradition of innovation.
The STP brand has been characterized by a commitment to technology, performance and motor sports partnerships for over 50 years. Regular use of STP additives as part of basic maintenance helps engines run better by boosting the cleaning performance of gas and saving gas by keeping fuel systems clean. We believe the STP brand’s fuel and oil additives, functional fluids and automotive appearance products benefit from a rich heritage in the car enthusiast and racing scenes.
On November 5, 2010, affiliates of Avista Capital Holdings, L.P. (“Avista”) acquired the Armor All, STP and certain other brands from The Clorox Company (“Clorox”) pursuant to the terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 21, 2010 (the “Acquisition”). Prior to the Acquisition, the brands were managed primarily for short-term profitability, with limited resources provided to drive growth in the business. In anticipation of a potential sale of the business by Clorox, the AutoCare Products Business was established as a stand-alone division. Following the Acquisition, we began to address several of the issues that had constrained the business. Specifically, we invested in increased merchandising support, increased racing sponsorships and changed the advertising on Armor All. We have continued this merchandising support and in 2012 have begun consumer advertising of STP. We continue to focus on innovation and building a pipeline of new products. We continue to invest in the business to build upon what we believe are strong brand equity and category positions of Armor All and STP and create strong growth momentum.
22
Table of Contents
Our strategy
We intend to build on our success by pursuing the following strategies:
· Launching new and innovative products. During 2011, we launched seven new Armor All products or improvements as well as two new STP products. In 2012, we have launched 19 new Armor All stock keeping units (“SKUs”), nine new STP SKUs as well as one SKU under the Tuff Stuff equity.
· Reinvigorating the STP brand. Marketing and new product support for the STP brand was limited under Clorox ownership. To address this deficiency in 2011, we launched two new products, re-launched the STP line of fuel additives in concentrate form and returned to a major part of our STP heritage in 2011 through racing sponsorships in NASCAR, the National Hot Rod Association (“NHRA”) and the World of Outlaws Sprint Car league. In 2012, we are continuing our new product introductions and racing sponsorships and have increased our marketing spending on TV, print and online advertising.
· Building upon trade relationships. Management is taking a more active approach to cultivating trade relationships, including pursuing in-store promotional activities, designing display support and endorsing other merchandising events to drive traffic for the retailer.
· Pursuing international growth. Previously, in many countries outside of the United States, Armor All and STP were a secondary priority for a sales force focused on selling Clorox’s core household cleaning products. Although approximately 32% and 30% of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, were sold outside the United States, we believe we can increase our percentage of sales generated in international markets.
· Entering into adjacent markets. The Armor All brand is grounded in its ability to clean, shine and protect and this has applications in both the automotive aftermarket appearance category and other uses within the home and for recreation. Additionally, both brands have opportunities to compete in the professional service facility market (the “Do it for Me,” or “DIFM” market).
· Opportunistically pursuing acquisitions. We plan to opportunistically evaluate transactions that can create value across our capital structure.
Factors affecting our financial statements and critical accounting policies
See Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and also described more fully in our financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies included within our final prospectus dated July 26, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on July 26, 2012 under Rule 424(b)(3) and as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-4 for a discussion of our accounting policies and how they impact our financial statements.
23
Table of Contents
Key performance indicators
Management reviews and analyzes several key performance indicators in order to manage our business and assess the quality of, and potential variability of, our earnings and cash flows. These key performance indicators include:
· Net sales which is an indicator of our overall business growth;
· Gross profit is a key factor in the relative strength of our brands as gross profits enable us to generate cash to maintain marketing support, and therefore improve brand health; and
· Operating expenses outright and as a percentage of net sales which is an indicator of the efficiency of our business and our ability to manage our business to budget.
We are solidifying our leading category share of the automotive aftermarket appearance products and performance products categories with innovation, investment in our established Armor All and STP brands, the introduction of new products, increased investments in racing sponsorships, and enhanced promotional events and advertising. While our net sales have been increasing as a result of these initiatives, there has broadly been a decline in the performance products category of the base business volume and an overall weakening of consumer discretionary spending in the markets within which we compete due to economic uncertainty in generally unfavorable economic conditions. In the event that our top-line growth and bottom-line profitability do not develop as expected, we may have to delay certain business initiatives and adjust our strategy accordingly.
Results of Operations
Three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 compared to corresponding periods in 2011
Financial data for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 68,348 | | $ | 61,826 | | $ | 6,522 | | 11 | % | $ | 237,439 | | $ | 221,808 | | $ | 15,631 | | 7 | % |
Cost of products sold | | 39,728 | | 33,814 | | 5,914 | | 17 | | 126,948 | | 115,086 | | 11,862 | | 10 | |
Cost of products sold - acquisition related | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 4,439 | | (4,439 | ) | (100 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 28,620 | | 28,012 | | 608 | | 2 | | 110,491 | | 102,283 | | 8,208 | | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 10,828 | | 8,304 | | 2,524 | | 30 | | 34,935 | | 28,033 | | 6,902 | | 25 | |
Advertising costs | | 7,929 | | 4,149 | | 3,780 | | 91 | | 27,414 | | 22,823 | | 4,591 | | 20 | |
Research and development costs | | 661 | | 397 | | 264 | | 66 | | 1,700 | | 1,807 | | (107 | ) | (6 | ) |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | 9,175 | | 9,175 | | — | | — | | 27,526 | | 27,526 | | — | | — | |
Acquisition-related charges | | — | | 45 | | (45 | ) | (100 | ) | — | | 994 | | (994 | ) | (100 | ) |
Total operating expenses | | 28,593 | | 22,070 | | 6,523 | | | | 91,575 | | 81,183 | | 10,392 | | | |
Operating profit | | 27 | | 5,942 | | (5,915 | ) | | | 18,916 | | 21,100 | | (2,184 | ) | | |
Non-operating expenses (income): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 12,406 | | 12,048 | | 358 | | 3 | | 36,829 | | 35,981 | | 848 | | 2 | |
Other expense, net | | 123 | | 550 | | (427 | ) | (78 | ) | 166 | | 280 | | (114 | ) | (41 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss before benefit for income taxes | | (12,502 | ) | (6,656 | ) | (5,846 | ) | | | (18,079 | ) | (15,161 | ) | (2,918 | ) | | |
Benefit for income taxes | | (2,729 | ) | (3,100 | ) | 371 | | | | (5,309 | ) | (6,429 | ) | 1,120 | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (9,773 | ) | $ | (3,556 | ) | $ | (6,217 | ) | | | $ | (12,770 | ) | $ | (8,732 | ) | $ | (4,038 | ) | | |
24
Table of Contents
Net sales
Our business is moderately seasonal. Our sales are typically higher in the first half of the calendar year as our customers purchase stock for the spring and summer seasons when weather is warmer in the northern hemisphere than in the fall and winter months. This pattern is largely reflective of our customers’ seasonal purchasing patterns, as well as the timing of our promotional activities. Weather can also influence consumer behavior, especially for appearance products. Our products sell best during warm, dry weather, and sell less strongly if weather is cold and wet.
Net sales for our North America segment include products marketed and sold to customers in the United States and Canada. Our International segment represents net sales to all other regions outside of the United States and Canada, primarily being Europe, Australia and Latin America. The following table summarizes our net sales for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):
| | Three months ended Sept 30, | | Change from Prior Year | | % of Net Sales | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | $ | | % | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
North America: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Armor All products | | $ | 29,409 | | $ | 29,904 | | $ | (495 | ) | -2 | % | 43 | % | 48 | % |
STP products | | 19,043 | | 13,126 | | 5,917 | | 45 | % | 28 | % | 21 | % |
Other brands | | 1,610 | | 1,893 | | (283 | ) | -15 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % |
Total North America | | 50,062 | | 44,923 | | 5,139 | | 11 | % | 73 | % | 73 | % |
International | | 18,286 | | 16,903 | | 1,383 | | 8 | % | 27 | % | 27 | % |
Consolidated Net Sales | | $ | 68,348 | | $ | 61,826 | | $ | 6,522 | | 11 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
| | Nine months ended Sept 30, | | Change from Prior Year | | % of Net Sales | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | $ | | % | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
North America: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Armor All products | | $ | 127,098 | | $ | 116,354 | | $ | 10,744 | | 9 | % | 54 | % | 52 | % |
STP products | | 49,791 | | 46,469 | | 3,322 | | 7 | % | 21 | % | 21 | % |
Other brands | | 6,436 | | 6,604 | | (168 | ) | -3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % |
Total North America | | 183,325 | | 169,427 | | 13,898 | | 8 | % | 77 | % | 76 | % |
International | | 54,114 | | 52,382 | | 1,732 | | 3 | % | 23 | % | 24 | % |
Consolidated Net Sales | | $ | 237,439 | | $ | 221,809 | | $ | 15,630 | | 7 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
In North America, net sales increased for both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2011. In the three months ended September 30, 2012, Armor All product sales were down 2% due to the timing of holiday gift pack sales which started in September of 2011 ahead of the SAP conversion. STP products grew 45% driven by a large promotional event with a key customer. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, Armor All and STP product sales grew by 9% and 7%, respectively. This growth was driven by new products and an increased investment in racing sponsorships and advertising spend. Additionally, a price increase that was effective June 2011 across both product lines resulted in higher prices in the first half of 2012. Partially offsetting this new product growth and price increase is the decline in the performance category of the base business volume.
The International net sales increase for the both the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the corresponding period in 2011 came from both our European and our Australian regions driven by new product sales. Our International net sales have been impacted by unfavorable exchange rate changes during the three month period ended September 30, 2012.
25
Table of Contents
Gross profit
Cost of products sold
Our cost of products sold for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | |
Cost of products sold | | $ | 39,728 | | $ | 33,814 | | $ | 5,914 | | 17 | | $ | 126,948 | | $ | 115,086 | | $ | 11,862 | | 10 | |
Stated as a percentage of net sales | | 58.1 | % | 54.7 | % | | | | | 53.5 | % | 51.9 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The increase in the cost of products sold is driven by the higher volume in both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012. The percentage increase in the cost of goods sold is higher than the net sales percentage increase for the three months ending September 30, 2012 due to higher freight and warehouse costs. We are working to establish our new business model independent of Clorox, and to stabilize our expenditures in warehousing and moving product. Despite having reduced our North American inventory by almost $4 million dollars since June of this year, we are still experiencing higher costs in the procurement of warehousing space and costs associated with the movement of product through our supply chain network. However, our overall product costs remain in line with expectations.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $4.4 million associated with the step-up in the value of inventory of $11.7 million that was recorded in connection with the Acquisition was recorded in cost of products sold-acquisition related as the inventory was sold.
Gross profit
Our gross profit for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | |
Gross profit | | $ | 28,620 | | $ | 28,012 | | $ | 608 | | 2 | | $ | 110,491 | | $ | 102,283 | | $ | 8,208 | | 8 | |
Stated as a percentage of net sales | | 41.9 | % | 45.3 | % | | | | | 46.5 | % | 46.1 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included the amortization of inventory step-up resulting from purchase accounting stemming from the Company’s acquisition in November 2010. Notwithstanding the impact of that purchase accounting, gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011 would have been 48.1%. As discussed above, the impact of the excess freight and warehousing costs negatively impacted the gross profit percentage for both the three month and nine month periods of September 30, 2012. Excluding the excess freight and warehousing costs, the gross profit rates for nine months ended 2012 would have been higher than the 2011 gross profit rates reflecting the impact of higher prices.
Selling and administrative expense, advertising costs, and research and development costs
Our selling and administrative expenses, advertising costs, and research and development costs for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | $ | 10,828 | | $ | 8,304 | | $ | 2,524 | | 30 | | $ | 34,935 | | $ | 28,033 | | $ | 6,902 | | 25 | |
Advertising costs | | 7,929 | | 4,149 | | 3,780 | | 91 | | 27,414 | | 22,823 | | 4,591 | | 20 | |
Research and development costs | | 661 | | 397 | | 264 | | 66 | | 1,700 | | 1,807 | | (107 | ) | (6 | ) |
| | $ | 19,418 | | $ | 12,850 | | $ | 6,568 | | 51 | | $ | 64,049 | | $ | 52,663 | | $ | 11,386 | | 22 | |
Stated as a percentage of net sales | | 28.4 | % | 20.8 | % | | | | | 27.0 | % | 23.7 | % | | | | |
26
Table of Contents
The increase in the selling and administrative expenses in both the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 was due to a redundancy in our workforce as we transitioned from the Clorox TSA to our permanent selling, marketing, finance and administrative staff. This overlap resulted in additional costs of $0.6 million and $3.6 million in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, respectively. In addition to these transitional costs, there are $0.7 million and $3.3 million of expenses related to our new ERP system during those same periods. These redundant costs have declined each quarter in 2012. Offsetting these costs on a year over year basis is the overall reduction in the Clorox TSA costs as we transition to a stand-alone company.
The increase in our advertising costs in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2011 was primarily due to the increase in spend related to reinvigoration of the STP brand.
The decrease in our research and development costs in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2011 was primarily due to the July 1, 2011 cessation of research and development services rendered by Clorox under the TSA.
Income taxes
Our effective benefit rate in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 21.8% and 46.5%, respectively, and in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 29.4% and 42.4%, respectively. Our effective benefit rate for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 reflects our anticipated effective benefit rate for 2012, which will differ from the statutory tax rate primarily due to the effect of additional expense for adjustments to state deferred taxes to reflect expectations of geographic earnings in the U.S., offset by the effect of U.S. federal manufacturing benefits expected for 2012 and the impact of foreign earnings taxed at rates below the U.S. federal rate which will increase the benefit rate on the anticipated loss for 2012.
The effective benefit rate for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 differed from the statutory tax rate primarily due to U.S. federal manufacturing benefits recognized during the period, which increased the benefit rate on the loss for the quarter. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, we determined that the actual tax expense for the period represented the best estimate of the tax provision for the year to date, in lieu of the general effective rate model.
Amendment to Credit Facility
We have made significant progress since our separation from Clorox in November 2010; we are independent of Clorox with our own sales force, autonomous supply chain, and stand-alone administration of the business; and we are pursuing our strategy for growth with product innovation and development of our Armor All and STP brands. However, the costs to separate and operate as a independent operation are proving greater than we had anticipated, and we have invested considerably in advertising and promoting the Armor All and STP brands. In light of our results during this important period, in September 2012 we entered into an amendment of our credit agreement, dated November 5, 2010, among Armored Auto Group Intermediate Inc. (f/k/a Viking Intermediate Inc.), the Company, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other agents parties thereto (as amended, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Facility”) revising the maximum consolidated leverage ratio and the minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio as applicable to the Company’s $50 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”). The amendment to our Credit Facility did not affect our results of operations for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2012 and we expect to satisfy the revised ratios. Further, in light of our historical results we considered the potential for impairment of our intangible and other long-lived assets but as our views for prospective success for the organization and its business across the globe have not fundamentally changed, we concluded it unlikely that they have been impaired.
27
Table of Contents
Liquidity and capital resources
Our principle sources of liquidity are our cash of $8.0 million as of September 30, 2012, and our $50.0 million Revolver on which we had $13.0 million outstanding as of September 30, 2012. Our principle source of operating cash in-flows is from sales of product to customers. Our principle operating cash out-flows relate to the purchase and production of inventory and related costs, advertising, selling and administrative expenses, and capital expenditures. We believe that, as of September 30, 2012, cash on hand, cash expected to be generated from future operating activities and cash available under the Revolver will be sufficient to fund our operations, including contractual obligations and capital expenditures. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash operations and borrowed funds under our Revolver were sufficient to service our debts and other obligations and fund seasonal and other cash flow requirements. As of September 30, 2012, we expect that we will generate cash from the underlying operations of the business and we will be able to obtain needed funds under the Revolver when requested. However, in the event that funds are not available from our operating activities or from the Revolver, we may have to delay certain business initiatives and adjust our strategy accordingly.
Cash flows
The following table summarizes our cash activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012 (in thousands):
| | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | $ | (724 | ) | $ | (7,183 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (6,718 | ) | (8,213 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 10,401 | | (2,125 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily attributable to an increase in net operating assets of $15.8 million and our net loss of $12.8 million, largely offset by non-cash charges of $27.8 million. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily attributable to an increase in net operating assets of $20.9 million and our net loss of $8.7 million, partially offset by non-cash charges of $22.6 million. The increase in our operating assets in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was comprised of an increase of $28.9 million in accounts receivable which was attributable to the increase in sales due to seasonality of appearance products and the transition of receivables team from Clorox; an increase in inventories of $15.1 million which was driven by the decision to increase inventory to aid customer order fulfillment following our North America supply chain and ERP separation from Clorox; offsetting these operating asset increases was an increase of $23.5 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities; and a $11.9 million decrease in the amount due from Clorox as we completed the transition of our North American and export operations.
28
Table of Contents
Investing activities
Our cash used in investing activities for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was comprised solely of capital expenditures. Capital spending declined to 2.8% from 3.7% of net sales in the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011 and is largely attributable to our ERP system implementation.
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included seasonal net borrowings on our Revolver of $13.0 million, $2.3 million of principal payments on our term loan and $0.4 million of debt financing costs incurred related to amending our credit facility. Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included $2.3 million of principal payments on our term loan and $0.6 million of debt financing costs incurred related to amending our credit facility, together with $0.8 million we received on behalf of our Parent related to the sale of Parent’s stock to certain of our employees.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently have no material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Credit Facility and Senior Notes
Our debts include the principal of our Revolver, senior secured term loan and 9.25% senior notes due 2018. For additional details related to our debts, please see Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Debt”, included in this Quarterly Report and Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, “Notes Payable”, included in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-180736) filed with the SEC.
Commitments and contingencies
For additional details related to our contractual obligations and other commitments and contingencies, please see Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies” included in this Quarterly Report and Note 8 of the Notes to Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, “Commitments and Contingencies”, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations “Certain Information Concerning Contractual Obligations” included in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-180736) filed with the SEC.
29
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign currency risk
We sell our products in many countries outside of the United States and, as such, are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk. However, our foreign currency exchange exposure is limited due to the concentration of our revenues and profitability in the United States. Additionally, our net sales are typically earned in the same currency in which we incur our expenses in the United States and Europe, which also mitigates for foreign exchange exposure. Given management’s belief that our business faces limited foreign exchange risk, we currently do not have any currency hedging programs in place; however, we will continue to assess our foreign exchange risk management strategy as our business outside of the United States grows.
Interest rate risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with our debt instruments. As of September 30, 2012, we have approximately $582.8 million of total debt outstanding, excluding $37.0 million of unused commitments under the Revolver, of which $307.8 million have been bearing interest at a variable a rate of the sum of (i) the greater of LIBOR or 1.75% and (ii) 4.25%. As LIBOR is currently less than 1.75%, even a one percentage point change on our variable rate debt would not have affected our interest expense in the nine month period ended September 30, 2012. However, if six month LIBOR, for example, were 1.5 percentage points higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 our interest expense would have increased approximately $0.8 million for the period. We currently do not have any interest rate swaps; however, we continually assess our interest rate risk for purposes of determining whether interest rate hedges would be consistent with our overall risk management strategy.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 2012, including controls and procedures to timely alert management to material information relating to the Company and its subsidiaries required to be included in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act. Based on such evaluation, they have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our second fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our disclosure controls and procedures provide our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer reasonable assurances that our disclosure controls and procedures will achieve their objectives. However, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting can or will prevent all human error. A control system, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are internal resource constraints, and the benefit of controls must be weighed relative to their corresponding costs. Because of the limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide complete assurance that all control issues and instances of error, if any, within our company are detected.
These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur due to human error or mistake. Additionally, controls, no matter how well designed, could be circumvented by the individual acts of specific persons within the organization. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all potential future conditions.
30
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In connection with the Acquisition, Clorox retained liability associated with a potential contract claim and the Company agreed to indemnify and reimburse Clorox for 50% of the first $5,000,000 in settlement costs related to the contract claim. As of both December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, the Company has accrued $2,500,000 in long-term liabilities related to this contingency.
We are involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and claims incident to the normal conduct of business, which may include proceedings that are specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices within the industries in which we operate. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and on the results of operations in a particular quarter or year. As of September 30, 2012, we had no material ongoing litigation, regulatory or other proceedings and had no knowledge of any investigations by governmental or regulatory authorities in which we are a target that could have a material adverse effect on our current business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” included within our final prospectus dated July 26, 2012 and filed with the SEC on July 26, 2012 under Rule 424(b)(3) and as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-4. The risks described in the final prospectus are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in the prospectus referred to above.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT NO. | | DESCRIPTION |
31.1† | | Certificate by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
31.2† | | Certificate by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1† | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2† | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
101 | | The following financial statements from Armored AutoGroup’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
† Filed herewith.
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 19, 2012
| ARMORED AUTOGROUP INC. | |
| | |
| | |
| /s/ DAVID P. LUNDSTEDT | |
| David P. Lundstedt | |
| Chairman, President, | |
| and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | |
| /s/ J. ANDREW BOLT | |
| J. Andrew Bolt | |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and | |
| Principle Accounting Officer | |
33