Fitweiser (FWSR) 10-Q 5 Nov 15 2015 Q3 Quarterly report Financial data

Document and Entity Information

Document and Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Oct. 30, 2015
Document and Entity Information:
Entity Registrant Name	FITWEISER HOLDINGS, INC.
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2015
Trading Symbol	fwsr
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	1,540,334
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		85,855,000
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2,015
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Incorporation, Date of Incorporation	Nov. 14, 2013
Entity Incorporation, State Country Name	Nevada

Balance Sheet (unaudited)

Balance Sheet (unaudited) - USD ($)		Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$ 4,292	$ 25,554
Deposits		12,500	20,866
Total Current assets		16,792	46,420
Intangible Assets
Patents		10,960	0
Intangible Assets		155,855	155,855
Total Assets		183,607	202,275
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		0	1,864
Related party accounts payable		0	0
Accrued expenses		105,460	62,200
Accrued interest		28,015	13,478
Short term notes payable		245,000	251,079
Total Current Liabilities		$ 378,475	$ 328,621
Commitments and Contingencies	[1]
Fitweiser Holdings, Inc. Shareholder's Deficit
Common Stock	[2]	$ 85,855	$ 85,855
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(280,723)	(212,201)
Total Deficit Fitweiser Holdings, Inc.		(194,868)	(126,346)
Total liabilities and deficit		$ 183,607	$ 202,275
[1]	See Note 7.
[2]	Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized. 85,855,000 issued and outstanding.

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Financial Position - Parenthetical (unaudited) - $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Balance Sheet
Common Stock, Par Value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	200,000,000	200,000,000
Common Stock, Shares Issued	85,855,000	85,855,000
Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	85,855,000	85,855,000

Statement of Operations (unaudi

Statement of Operations (unaudited) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Statement of Operations
Revenues	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Operating Expenses	15,025	23,759	53,985	148,933
Net Income(Loss) from Operations	(15,025)	(23,759)	(53,985)	(148,933)
Other Income(Expenses)
Interest Expense	(5,139)	(4,050)	(14,537)	(8,595)
Total other income	(5,139)	(4,050)	(14,537)	(8,595)
Net Income(Loss) from Operations Before Income Taxes	(20,164)	(27,809)	(68,522)	(157,528)
Tax Expense	0	0	0	0
Net Income(Loss)	$ (20,164)	$ (27,809)	$ (68,522)	$ (157,528)
Income (Loss) Per Share Basic and Diluted	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Weighted average number of shares outstanding	85,855,000	85,855,000	85,855,000	71,930,000

Statement of Cash Flows (unaudi

Statement of Cash Flows (unaudited) - USD ($)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$ (68,522)	$ (157,528)
Common stock issued for services	0	73,500
(Increase) decrease in other fixed assets	8,366
(Increase) decrease in patent assets	(10,960)	(13,366)
Increase(decrease) in accounts payable	(1,864)	(3,015)
Increase(decrease) in accounts payable related party		(1,974)
Increase (decrease) in short term notes payable	(6,079)
Increase(decrease) in accrued expenses	43,260	31,800
Increase(decrease) in accrued interest	14,537	8,595
Net cash used in operating activities	(21,262)	(61,988)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of intangible assets	0	(155,855)
Stock issued for assets	0	0
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities	0	(155,855)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Stock issued for acquisition	0	10,855
Proceeds from notes payable	0	145,000
Proceeds of sale of common stock	0	1,000
Net cash provided(used) by financing activities	0	156,855
Increase in cash and equivalents	(21,262)	(60,988)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	25,554	63,063
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	4,292	2,075
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OFCASH FLOW INFORMATION
Income taxes paid	0	0
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Common stock issued	$ 0	$ 0

Description of The Company

Description of The Company	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Description of The Company	1. Description of the Company Description of Development Stage Operations Fitweiser, Inc. was incorporated on November 14, 2013 in the state of Nevada. It completed a Share Exchange Agreement with Royal Bees Company, Inc. (Royal Bees), a Nevada corporation wherein Royal Bees exchanged approximately 83 % of its total issued and outstanding common stock for 100% of Fitweiser Inc. issued and outstanding common stock in a tax free exchange on May 28, 2014. The surviving company changed its name to Fitweiser Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”, “We”, “Our”). The Company is a developing stage entity that is engaged in the development and monetization of intellectual property worldwide. The Company’s Intellectual property (IP) portfolio consist of in-process patent applications and an agreement to acquired patents covering analog and digital wireless communications and telecom, mobile technologies, security strategies and internet search and storage for business, consumer and government clientele. The Company’s patent applications are being developed internally. The company filed for three patents during the third quarter 2014. Two patents were issued in the third quarter 2015. Potential applications for our IP include dynamic, interactive and media-rich text, audio, video, and virtual content and systems delivery through landline/cable and wireless broadband, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Near Field Communication (NFC) and Rapidly Emerging Technologies, serving multiple industry sectors that can include portable apps used in smart device including cell phones and tablets for user-defined and offline communications that encompasses networking, input and output permission-base and/or restricted access, authentication, activation, recognition and monitory, demographic targeting, end-user, profiling, audience capturing, aggregation, sit and/or cloud based storage and search. The Company is exposed to a number of risks during the normal conduct of its business considering its stage in the business life cycle. These risks include, but are not limited to: (1) its ability to obtain the capital necessary to fund its operations to a point where the business can generate positive cash flows and become self-sustaining; (2) its ability to successfully protect intellectual property associated with the Company’s technology and products; and (3) its ability to attract and retain employees with the technical and other capabilities necessary to execute its business plan.

Significant Accounting Policies

Significant Accounting Policies	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Significant Accounting Policies	2. Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of financial statements. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents may include highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value due to interest rate, market price, or penalty on withdrawal. Amounts on deposit and available upon demand, or negotiated to provide for daily liquidity without penalty, are classified as Cash and cash equivalents. No items of Other Comprehensive Income and Loss The Company has no items of other comprehensive income loss for the period from November 14, 2013 (inception) to September 30, 2015. Therefore, the net loss as presented in the Company’s Statement Operations equals comprehensive loss. Income Taxes The Company accounts for its income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes .” Loss Per Share The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260-10, " ." Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) all obligations have been substantially performed pursuant to the terms of the arrangement, (iii) amounts are fixed or determinable, and (iv) the collectability of amounts is reasonably assured. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605 Revenue Recognition and Concepts Statement 5, Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises Intangible Assets - Patents Patents include the cost of patents or patent rights (hereinafter, collectively “patents”), obtained from third-parties or obtained in connection with business combinations. Capitalized patent costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their remaining economic useful lives, ranging from one to ten years. Certain patent application and prosecution costs incurred to secure additional patent claims, that based on management’s estimates are deemed to be recoverable, will be capitalized and amortized over the remaining estimated economic useful life of the related patent portfolio. Intangible Assets – Short Term Note and Royal Bees Stock As part of the Share Exchange Agreement with Royal Bees, the Company inherited a short term note for $145, 000 payable in cash no later than May 28, 2015; the annual interest is 6% and is payable at the same time the note is retired, with interest accrued monthly. The Company sent a letter to World Ventures in June 2015 requesting an extension of the loan to June 30, 2016, with the provision that if the Company did not get a response in writing by July 31, 2015, it is the understanding of Fitweiser Holdings that the loan is extended until June 30, 2015; no response was received as of July 31, 2015. The Company has the option to satisfy the $145, 000 payable with 725,000 shares ($0.20 per share) of post-Merger common stock of the Company. As part of the Share Exchange Agreement with Royal Bees, the Company received 10,855,000 shares of Royal Bees stock which is valued at $0.001per share. Impairment of Long-lived Assets. The company reviews long-lived assets and intangible assets for potential impairment annually (quarterly for patents) and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In the event the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value is recorded. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows. Fair value is generally estimated using the “Income Approach,” focusing on the estimated future net income-producing capability of the patent portfolios over the estimated remaining economic useful life. Estimates of future after-tax cash flows are converted to present value through “discounting,” including an estimated rate of return that accounts for both the time value of money and investment risk factors. Estimated cash inflows are typically based on estimates of reasonable royalty rates for the applicable technology, applied to estimated market share data. Estimated cash outflows are based on existing contractual obligations, such as contingent legal fee and inventor royalty obligations, applied to estimated license fee revenues, in addition to other estimates of out-of-pocket expenses associated with a specific patent portfolio’s licensing and enforcement program. The analysis also contemplates consideration of current information about the patent portfolio including, status and stage of litigation, periodic results of the litigation process, strength of the patent portfolio, technology coverage and other pertinent information that could impact future net cash flows. Business segments ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” “management approach” the company The Company Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2015 consist principally of short term instruments which are financial liabilities with carrying values that approximate fair value. The Company determines the fair value of these liabilities based on the effective yields of similar obligations. The Company believes all of the financial instruments’ recorded values approximate fair market value because of their nature and respective durations. The Company complies with the provisions of ASC No. 820-10 (“ASC 820-10”), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions, about market participant assumptions, which are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below: Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access. Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment" ("ASU 2012-02"), which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the asset's carrying value before applying the two-step goodwill impairment model that is currently in place. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is more likely than not greater than the asset's carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. The qualitative assessment is optional, allowing companies to go directly to the quantitative assessment. ASU 2012-02 is effective for the Company for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed beginning October 1, 2012; however, early adoption is permitted. The Company believes the adoption of ASU 2012-02 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In January 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which includes bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements that are either offset on the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. This guidance is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 24, 2013. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which provides additional disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of AOCI. This guidance is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 24, 2013. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. This update will require an entity to record an obligation resulting from joint and several liability arrangements at the greater of the amount that the entity has agreed to pay or the amount the entity expects to pay. Additional disclosures about joint and several liability arrangements will also be required. This guidance is effective for the company beginning January 1, 2014, and is to be applied retrospectively for obligations that exist at the date of adoption. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU n. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 requires the netting of unrecognized tax benefit (“UTBs”) against deferred tax assets for a loss and re other Carryforward that would apply settlement of the uncertain tax positions. UTBs. ASI 2013-11 is effective for years, including interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Going Concern

Going Concern	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Going Concern	3. Going Concern The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Currently, the Company has not established any revenue source and has incurred operating losses, and as of September 30, 2015 the Company had a working capital deficit of $374,183 and an accumulated deficit of $280,723. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management believes that the Company’s capital requirements will depend on many factors including the success of the Company’s development efforts and its efforts to raise capital. Management also believes the Company needs to raise additional capital for working capital purposes. There is no assurance that such financing will be available in the future. The conditions described above raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Income Taxes	4. Income Taxes Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The effective tax rate on the net loss before income taxes differs from the U.S. statutory rate as follows: 9/30/2015 9/30/2014 U.S statutory rate 35% 35% Less valuation allowance -0.35% -0.35% Effective tax rate 0% 0% The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: 9/30/2015 9/30/2014 Deferred tax assets Net operating losses $ 280,723 $ 189,905 Deferred tax liability - - Net deferred tax assets 98,2563 64,467 Less valuation allowance (98,253) (64,467) Deferred tax asset - net valuation allowance $ - $ - The Company has a net operating loss carryover of approximately $280,723 available to offset future income for income tax reporting purposes, which will expire in various years through 2032, if not previously utilized. However, the Company’s ability to use the carryover net operating loss may be substantially limited or eliminated pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, formerly FIN 48, and “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. The Company had no material unrecognized income tax assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2013. The Company’s policy regarding income tax interest and penalties is to expense those items as general and administrative expense but to identify them for tax purposes. During the period November 14, 2013(inception) through September 30, 2015, there were no income tax, or related interest and penalty items in the income statement, or liabilities on the balance sheet. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and Nevada state jurisdiction. We are not currently involved in any income tax examinations.

Short Term Note Payable

Short Term Note Payable	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Short Term Note Payable	5. Short Term Note Payable On November 29, 2013, the company issued an unsecured promissory note payable to an individual for $75,000. The note payable bears interest at 10 % per annum and all principal and accrued interest was due on December 1, 2014. This loan was increased by $25,000 in December 2014 for a new total of $100,000, with interest at 10% per annum, due on July 30, 2015. Additionally, the loan can automatically be extended for an additional 90 days, with interest increased to 12% per annum. Since the term of the note payable is less than 12 months, the entire amount of the principal and accrued interest is presented as a current liability. At September 30, 2015 accrued interest on the note payable is $16,665. The note payable contains language which indicates that both parties have discussed in principal the terms of a conversion provision to the note payable, but only in the event that both parties execute a separate agreement. Until such an agreement is executed. The note payable is not convertible into common stock of the Company. On November 15, 2013 the company issued a note for $67,500 in the purchase of assets for its intangible asset portfolio. This note has no stated interest rate and was payable by July 31, 2014. This agreement was extended to pay the entity $17,500 in the event the company closes any new round of debt and/or equity financing of $200,000 or more. Additionally, the company and the entity agreed to extend the July 31, 2014 date to May 28, 2015. On May 28, 2014, the company, in a Share Exchange Agreement with Royal Bees Company, Inc. (whereby the surviving entity was Fitweiser Holdings, Inc). took over an unsecured promissory note payable to World Venture for $145,000. The note payable bears interest at 6% per annum and all principal and accrued interest was due on May 28, 2015. The Company sent a letter to World Ventures in June 2015 requesting an extension of the loan to June 30, 2016, with the proviso that if the Company did not get a response in writing by July 31, 2015, it is the understanding of Fitweiser Holdings that the loan is extended until June 30, 2015; no response was received as of July 31, 2015.

Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Related Party Transactions	6. Related Party Transactions Sale of Common Stock Upon incorporation, the founder of the Company, who is also the CEO and Chairman, purchased 500,00 shares of the company’s common stock for a total of $500 at a per share cash price of $0.001. On February 18, 2014 Red Rock Servicing purchased 1,000,000 shares of the company’s common stock for a total $1,000 at a per share cash price of $0.001. In July 2014, the CEO consulting agreement was extended to May 21, 2015 and has been further extended to June 30, 2016. Some provisions are to defer or pay the CEO for his consulting services and health benefits depending on how and when financing can be secured. Technology Assignment Release Agreement As discussed in Note 7, the Company has agreed to the terms of a technology assignment agreement with an individual who is the owner of two patent applications which will be treated as purchased intangible assets upon its completion. The technology assignment agreement was originally negotiated by an entity owned by the CEO of the Company, which is a related party. As consideration for negotiating the agreement, and in concert with the Company entering into the technology assignment with the patent application holder, the Company simultaneously entered into a release agreement with the entity owned by the CEO of the Company which released all rights and claims the entity owned by the CEO had to the patent applications. As consideration for the release all rights and claims, the entity owned by the CEO of the company received a non-refundable deposit of $7,500. Additionally, if the Company was able to successfully execute the technology assignments agreement, which was to be completed on or before July 31, 2014, the entity owned by the CEO would receive $67,500 within five business days of the execution of the technology assignment agreement. This agreement was extended to pay the entity $17,500 in the event the company closes any new round of debt and/or equity financing of $200,000 or more. Additionally, the company and the entity agreed to extend the July 31, 2014 date to May 28, 2015. The entity owned by the CEO of the Company would also receive a royalty and lump-sum payment on the future commercial product sales similar to the seller of the intellectual property. The initial payment of $7,500 was satisfied in January 2014 and was presented as a deposit for future patents to be granted. During January of 2014 the company completed the following related party transactions which were classified as expense by the company. In July 2014, the consulting agreements for Soriano, Tuthill, Jason Campidonica, Red Rock Servicing, Langdon, and O’Hara were extended from January 31, 2014 to May 28, 2015, with some provisions to pay the consultants in stock in the event that the company has not completed a Qualified Round of Financing of $1,500,000 or more by January 31, 2015. The consulting agreements were extended until June 30, 2016. Michael Soriano did not fulfill his remaining consulting agreement beginning January 2015. Thus, 5,000,000 shares in Soriano’s name were redistributed to: Rudy Campidonica (3,700,000 shares), Steve Tuthill (550,000 shares), Harry Langdon (550,000 shares) and Jason Campidonica (200,000 shares) The shares presented below are for the January 2014 shares and the redistributed shares (this excludes the purchase of 1,500,000 shares under Sale of Common Stock above). Consulting Shares Authorized Michael Soriano 2,450,000 Steve Tuthill 8,000,000 Jason Campidonica 1,000,000 Red Rock Servicing 6,450,000 John Rosati 150,000 Michael Hensley 150,000 J. Scott Buono 50,000 Harry Tachian 50,000 Rudy Campidonica 44,200,000 Harry L Langdon 8,000,000 Mary O'Hara 3,000,000 Upon the execution of the May 28, 2014 Share Exchange Agreement with Royal Bees Company, Inc. (RBC), the Company received an additional 10,855,000 shares of common stock valued at $.001/share from RBC shareholders. These shares are in addition to the 75,000,000 existing shares from Fitweiser, Inc. to total 85,855,000 shares of common stock now in Fitweiser Holdings, Inc. Each of the 25 RBC shareholders has 220,000 shares or less, except for the former CEO, Vladimir Lyashevskiy, who has 10,000,000 common shares of Fitweiser Holdings, Inc.

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Commitments and Contingencies	7. Commitments and Contingencies None Technology Assignment Agreement The Company has agreed to the terms of a technology assignment agreement with an individual who is the owner of two patent applications relating to technology for resistance exercise equipment. The agreement is contingent on the Company executing a first round of financing no later than July 31, 2014. The agreement may be terminated by the owner of the patent application if the financing has no taken place before August 31, 2014. In July 2014, the company and the individual agreed to extend the July 31, 2014 agreement to May 28, 2015.

Significant Accounting Polici13

Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates in The Financial Statements (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates in The Financial Statements	Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of financial statements.

Significant Accounting Polici14

Significant Accounting Policies: Cash and Cash Equivalents (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents may include highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value due to interest rate, market price, or penalty on withdrawal. Amounts on deposit and available upon demand, or negotiated to provide for daily liquidity without penalty, are classified as Cash and cash equivalents.

Significant Accounting Polici15

Significant Accounting Policies: No Items of Other Comprehensive Income and Loss (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
No Items of Other Comprehensive Income and Loss	No items of Other Comprehensive Income and Loss The Company has no items of other comprehensive income loss for the period from November 14, 2013 (inception) to September 30, 2015. Therefore, the net loss as presented in the Company’s Statement Operations equals comprehensive loss.

Significant Accounting Polici16

Significant Accounting Policies: Income Taxes (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Income Taxes	Income Taxes The Company accounts for its income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes .”

Significant Accounting Polici17

Significant Accounting Policies: Loss Per Share (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Loss Per Share	Loss Per Share The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260-10, " ."

Significant Accounting Polici18

Significant Accounting Policies: Revenue Recognition (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Revenue Recognition	Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) all obligations have been substantially performed pursuant to the terms of the arrangement, (iii) amounts are fixed or determinable, and (iv) the collectability of amounts is reasonably assured. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605 Revenue Recognition and Concepts Statement 5, Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises

Significant Accounting Polici19

Significant Accounting Policies: Intangible Assets - Patents (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Intangible Assets - Patents	Intangible Assets - Patents Patents include the cost of patents or patent rights (hereinafter, collectively “patents”), obtained from third-parties or obtained in connection with business combinations. Capitalized patent costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their remaining economic useful lives, ranging from one to ten years. Certain patent application and prosecution costs incurred to secure additional patent claims, that based on management’s estimates are deemed to be recoverable, will be capitalized and amortized over the remaining estimated economic useful life of the related patent portfolio.

Significant Accounting Polici20

Significant Accounting Policies: Intangible Assets - Short Term Note and Royal Bees Stock (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Intangible Assets - Short Term Note and Royal Bees Stock	Intangible Assets – Short Term Note and Royal Bees Stock As part of the Share Exchange Agreement with Royal Bees, the Company inherited a short term note for $145, 000 payable in cash no later than May 28, 2015; the annual interest is 6% and is payable at the same time the note is retired, with interest accrued monthly. The Company sent a letter to World Ventures in June 2015 requesting an extension of the loan to June 30, 2016, with the provision that if the Company did not get a response in writing by July 31, 2015, it is the understanding of Fitweiser Holdings that the loan is extended until June 30, 2015; no response was received as of July 31, 2015. The Company has the option to satisfy the $145, 000 payable with 725,000 shares ($0.20 per share) of post-Merger common stock of the Company. As part of the Share Exchange Agreement with Royal Bees, the Company received 10,855,000 shares of Royal Bees stock which is valued at $0.001per share.

Significant Accounting Polici21

Significant Accounting Policies: Impairment of Long-lived Assets. (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Impairment of Long-lived Assets.	Impairment of Long-lived Assets. The company reviews long-lived assets and intangible assets for potential impairment annually (quarterly for patents) and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In the event the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value is recorded. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows. Fair value is generally estimated using the “Income Approach,” focusing on the estimated future net income-producing capability of the patent portfolios over the estimated remaining economic useful life. Estimates of future after-tax cash flows are converted to present value through “discounting,” including an estimated rate of return that accounts for both the time value of money and investment risk factors. Estimated cash inflows are typically based on estimates of reasonable royalty rates for the applicable technology, applied to estimated market share data. Estimated cash outflows are based on existing contractual obligations, such as contingent legal fee and inventor royalty obligations, applied to estimated license fee revenues, in addition to other estimates of out-of-pocket expenses associated with a specific patent portfolio’s licensing and enforcement program. The analysis also contemplates consideration of current information about the patent portfolio including, status and stage of litigation, periodic results of the litigation process, strength of the patent portfolio, technology coverage and other pertinent information that could impact future net cash flows.

Significant Accounting Polici22

Significant Accounting Policies: Business Segments (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Business Segments	Business segments ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” “management approach” the company The Company

Significant Accounting Polici23

Significant Accounting Policies: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2015 consist principally of short term instruments which are financial liabilities with carrying values that approximate fair value. The Company determines the fair value of these liabilities based on the effective yields of similar obligations. The Company believes all of the financial instruments’ recorded values approximate fair market value because of their nature and respective durations. The Company complies with the provisions of ASC No. 820-10 (“ASC 820-10”), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions, about market participant assumptions, which are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below: Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access. Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Significant Accounting Polici24

Significant Accounting Policies: Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Policies
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment" ("ASU 2012-02"), which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the asset's carrying value before applying the two-step goodwill impairment model that is currently in place. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is more likely than not greater than the asset's carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. The qualitative assessment is optional, allowing companies to go directly to the quantitative assessment. ASU 2012-02 is effective for the Company for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed beginning October 1, 2012; however, early adoption is permitted. The Company believes the adoption of ASU 2012-02 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In January 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which includes bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements that are either offset on the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. This guidance is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 24, 2013. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which provides additional disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of AOCI. This guidance is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 24, 2013. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. This update will require an entity to record an obligation resulting from joint and several liability arrangements at the greater of the amount that the entity has agreed to pay or the amount the entity expects to pay. Additional disclosures about joint and several liability arrangements will also be required. This guidance is effective for the company beginning January 1, 2014, and is to be applied retrospectively for obligations that exist at the date of adoption. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU n. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 requires the netting of unrecognized tax benefit (“UTBs”) against deferred tax assets for a loss and re other Carryforward that would apply settlement of the uncertain tax positions. UTBs. ASI 2013-11 is effective for years, including interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Income Taxes_ Schedule of Effec

Income Taxes: Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Tables/Schedules
Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation	9/30/2015 9/30/2014 U.S statutory rate 35% 35% Less valuation allowance -0.35% -0.35% Effective tax rate 0% 0%

Income Taxes_ Schedule of Defer

Income Taxes: Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Tables/Schedules
Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities	9/30/2015 9/30/2014 Deferred tax assets Net operating losses $ 280,723 $ 189,905 Deferred tax liability - - Net deferred tax assets 98,2563 64,467 Less valuation allowance (98,253) (64,467) Deferred tax asset - net valuation allowance $ - $ -

Related Party Transactions_ Sch

Related Party Transactions: Schedule of Related Party Transactions (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Tables/Schedules
Schedule of Related Party Transactions	Consulting Shares Authorized Michael Soriano 2,450,000 Steve Tuthill 8,000,000 Jason Campidonica 1,000,000 Red Rock Servicing 6,450,000 John Rosati 150,000 Michael Hensley 150,000 J. Scott Buono 50,000 Harry Tachian 50,000 Rudy Campidonica 44,200,000 Harry L Langdon 8,000,000 Mary O'Hara 3,000,000

Description of The Company (Det

Description of The Company (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Details
Entity Incorporation, Date of Incorporation	Nov. 14, 2013
Entity Incorporation, State Country Name	Nevada

Going Concern (Details)

Going Concern (Details) - USD ($)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Details
Substantial Doubt about Going Concern, Conditions or Events	Currently, the Company has not established any revenue source and has incurred operating losses, and as of September 30, 2015 the Company had a working capital deficit of $374,183 and an accumulated deficit of $280,723. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Working capital deficit	$ 374,183
Deficit accumulated during development stage	$ (280,723)	$ (212,201)
Substantial Doubt about Going Concern, Management's Evaluation	Management believes that the Company’s capital requirements will depend on many factors including the success of the Company’s development efforts and its efforts to raise capital. Management also believes the Company needs to raise additional capital for working capital purposes.

Income Taxes_ Schedule of Eff30

Income Taxes: Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation (Details)	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Details
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, at Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate, Percent	35.00%	35.00%
Valuation allowance	(0.35%)	(0.35%)
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Percent	0.00%	0.00%

Income Taxes_ Schedule of Def31

Income Taxes: Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities (Details) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Deferred Tax Assets, Net
Operating Income (Loss)	$ 280,723	$ 189,905
Deferred Tax Assets, Net	982,563	64,467
Deferred Tax Assets, Valuation Allowance	$ (98,253)	$ (64,467)

Short Term Note Payable (Detail

Short Term Note Payable (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015USD ($)
An individual
Debt Instrument, Issuance Date	Nov. 29, 2013
Debt Instrument, Face Amount	$ 75,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	10.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date, Description	December 1, 2014
Interest Expense, Debt, Excluding Amortization	$ 16,665
An individual, revised
Debt Instrument, Face Amount	$ 25,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	10.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date, Description	July 30, 2015
Entity
Debt Instrument, Issuance Date	Nov. 15, 2013
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date, Description	May 28, 2015
Short-term Debt	$ 67,500
Short-term Debt, Terms	was extended to pay the entity $17,500 in the event the company closes any new round of debt and/or equity financing of $200,000 or more
World Venture
Debt Instrument, Issuance Date	May 28, 2014
Debt Instrument, Face Amount	$ 145,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	6.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date, Description	all principal and accrued interest was due on May 28, 2015

Related Party Transactions (Det

Related Party Transactions (Details) - USD ($)	Feb. 18, 2014	Nov. 15, 2013	Sep. 30, 2015
Rudy Campidonica, CEO
Shares, Issued		50,000
Related Party Transaction, Amounts of Transaction		$ 500
Shares Issued, Price Per Share		$ 0.001
Red Rock Servicing
Shares, Issued	1,000,000
Related Party Transaction, Amounts of Transaction	$ 1,000
Shares Issued, Price Per Share	$ 0.001
The Owner of Two Patent Applications
Related Party Transaction, Amounts of Transaction			$ 7,500
Related Party Transaction, Description of Transaction			As consideration for negotiating the agreement, and in concert with the Company entering into the technology assignment with the patent application holder, the Company simultaneously entered into a release agreement with the entity owned by the CEO of the Company which released all rights and claims the entity owned by the CEO had to the patent applications. As consideration for the release all rights and claims, the entity owned by the CEO of the company received a non-refundable deposit of $7,500.
Related Party Transaction, Date			May 28, 2015
Soriano, Tuthill, Jason Campidonica, Red Rock Servicing, Langdon, and O'Hara
Related Party Transaction, Description of Transaction			In July 2014, the consulting agreements for Soriano, Tuthill, Jason Campidonica, Red Rock Servicing, Langdon, and O’Hara were extended from January 31, 2014 to May 28, 2015, with some provisions to pay the consultants in stock in the event that the company has not completed a Qualified Round of Financing of $1,500,000 or more by January 31, 2015

Related Party Transactions_ S34

Related Party Transactions: Schedule of Related Party Transactions (Details) - shares	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	200,000,000	200,000,000
Soriano
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	2,450,000
Tuthill
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	8,000,000
Jason Campidonica
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	1,000,000
Red Rock Servicing
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	6,450,000
Rosati
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	150,000
Hensley
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	150,000
Buono
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	50,000
Tachian
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	50,000
Rudy Campidonica, CEO
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	44,200,000
Langdon
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	8,000,000
O'Hara
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	3,000,000