Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities | Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Prosper measures the fair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value: Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologies for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. Investments held at fair value consist of Available for Sale Investments. The Available for Sale Investments may consist of corporate debt securities, commercial paper, U.S. Treasury securities, Treasury bills, agency bonds and short term bond funds. When available, Prosper uses quoted prices in active markets to measure the fair value of securities available for sale. When utilizing market data and bid-ask spreads, Prosper uses the price within the bid-ask spread that best represents fair value. When quoted prices do not exist, Prosper uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing services to measure the fair value of investment assets. Prosper's primary independent pricing service provides prices based on observable trades and discounted cash flows that incorporate observable information, such as yields for similar types of securities (a benchmark interest rate plus observable spreads) and weighted-average maturity for the same or similar securities. Prosper compares the prices obtained from its primary independent pricing service to the prices obtained from the additional independent pricing services to determine if the price obtained from the primary independent pricing service is reasonable. Prosper does not adjust the prices received from independent third-party pricing services unless such prices are inconsistent with the definition of fair value and result in a material difference in the recorded amounts. The Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability is valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Refer to Note 13 for further details. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands): September 30, 2019 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 540,969 $ 540,969 Loans Held for Sale — — 231,644 231,644 Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value — 1,500 — 1,500 Servicing Assets — — 12,936 12,936 Total Assets $ — $ 1,500 $ 785,549 $ 787,049 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 247,725 $ 247,725 Servicing Liabilities — — 2 2 Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value — — 37,564 37,564 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability — — 152,342 152,342 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,281 3,281 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 440,914 $ 440,914 December 31, 2018 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 263,522 $ 263,522 Loans Held for Sale — — 183,788 183,788 Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value — 22,173 — 22,173 Servicing Assets — — 14,687 14,687 Total Assets $ — $ 22,173 $ 461,997 $ 484,170 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 264,003 $ 264,003 Servicing Liabilities — — 12 12 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability — — 143,679 143,679 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,118 3,118 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 410,812 $ 410,812 As Prosper’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, Notes, and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. Significant Unobservable Inputs The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper’s level 3 fair value measurements at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes: Range Unobservable Input September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 4.7% - 12.3% 4.7% - 13.8% Default rate 2.1% - 18.4% 2.0% - 15.8% Servicing Rights: Range Unobservable Input September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.8% - 18.8% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.5% - 27.8% 15.5% - 25.1% Market servicing rate 0.625 % 0.625 % Loan Trailing Fee Liability: Range Unobservable Input September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.8% - 18.8% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.5% - 27.8% 15.5% - 25.1% At September 30, 2019, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. The following tables present additional information about level 3 Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at July 1, 2019 $ 606,799 $ (253,425) $ (44,090) $ 114,962 $ 424,246 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 41,460 (41,439) — 647,896 647,917 Principal repayments (87,348) 40,993 4,173 (19,580) (61,762) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (1,526) — — (511,596) (513,122) Other changes 240 (65) 252 832 1,259 Change in fair value (18,656) 6,211 2,101 (870) (11,214) Balance at September 30, 2019 $ 540,969 $ (247,725) $ (37,564) $ 231,644 $ 487,324 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at July 1, 2018 $ 277,361 $ (277,425) $ 116,817 $ 116,753 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 43,596 (43,797) 542,910 542,709 Principal repayments (42,139) 43,418 (13,105) (11,826) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (843) — (530,496) (531,339) Other changes 24 (9) 73 88 Change in fair value (9,450) 9,225 (3,004) (3,229) Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 268,549 $ (268,588) $ 113,195 $ 113,156 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 263,522 $ (264,003) $ — $ 183,788 $ 183,307 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 390,089 (128,152) (51,595) 1,809,133 2,019,475 Transfers in (Transfers out) 147,773 — — (147,773) — Principal repayments (221,379) 126,721 8,445 (46,109) (132,322) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (3,412) — — (1,564,904) (1,568,316) Other changes 331 538 (351) 921 1,439 Change in fair value (35,955) 17,171 5,937 (3,412) (16,259) Balance at September 30, 2019 $ 540,969 $ (247,725) $ (37,564) $ 231,644 $ 487,324 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2018 $ 293,005 $ (293,948) $ 49 $ (894) Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 134,671 (134,490) 1,867,010 1,867,191 Principal repayments (131,086) 134,943 (27,370) (23,513) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (2,859) — (1,724,147) (1,727,006) Other changes (314) 624 869 1,179 Change in fair value (24,868) 24,283 (3,216) (3,801) Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 268,549 $ (268,588) $ 113,195 $ 113,156 The following tables present additional information about level 3 servicing assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Servicing Fair Value at July 1, 2019 $ 13,387 Additions 2,859 Less: Changes in fair value (3,310) Fair Value at September 30, 2019 $ 12,936 Servicing Fair Value at July 1, 2018 15,644 Additions 3,156 Less: Changes in fair value (3,362) Fair Value at September 30, 2018 $ 15,438 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2019 $ 14,687 Additions 9,237 Derecognition (1,049) Less: Changes in fair value (9,939) Fair Value at September 30, 2019 $ 12,936 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2018 $ 14,711 Additions 10,658 Derecognition — Less: Changes in fair value (9,931) Fair Value at September 30, 2018 $ 15,438 The following table presents additional information about level 3 Preferred Stock Warrant Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Preferred Stock Balance as of July 1, 2019 $ 166,559 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant — Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability (14,217) Balance as of September 30, 2019 $ 152,342 Preferred Stock Balance as of July 1, 2018 $ 143,676 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant 19,561 Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability (9,283) Balance as of September 30, 2018 $ 153,954 Preferred Stock Balance as of January 1, 2019 $ 143,679 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant 17,553 Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability (8,890) Balance as of September 30, 2019 $ 152,342 Preferred Stock Balance as of January 1, 2018 $ 116,366 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant 55,473 Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability (17,885) Balance as of September 30, 2018 $ 153,954 Loan Trailing Fee The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates using a discounted cash flow model. The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Loan Trailing Fee Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 3,118 Issuances 2,063 Cash Payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,744) Change in Fair Value (156) Balance at September 30, 2019 $ 3,281 Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at September 30, 2019 for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages): Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale Notes Fair Value as of September 30, 2019 $ 772,613 $ 247,725 Discount rate assumption: 7.03 % * 6.90 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 765,521 $ 245,448 200 basis point increase $ 758,597 $ 243,225 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 779,880 $ 250,059 200 basis point decrease $ 787,326 $ 252,450 Default rate assumption: 12.27 % * 13.50 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 762,459 $ 244,453 200 basis point increase $ 752,608 $ 241,278 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 782,961 $ 251,059 200 basis point decrease $ 793,379 $ 254,417 * Represents weighted average assumptions considering all credit grades. The following table presents the estimated impact on Prosper’s estimated fair value of servicing assets, calculated using different market servicing rates and different default rates as of September 30, 2019 (in thousands, except percentages). Servicing Assets Fair Value as of September 30, 2019 $ 12,936 Market servicing rate assumptions 0.625 % Resulting fair value from: Market servicing rate increase to 0.65% $ 12,148 Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60% $ 13,758 Weighted average prepayment assumptions 21.49 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 12,781 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 13,127 Weighted average default assumptions 12.70 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate $ 12,793 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate $ 13,116 These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects. Financial Instruments, Assets and Liabilities not Recorded at Fair Value The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for financial instruments, assets, and liabilities not recorded at fair value (in thousands): September 30, 2019 Carrying Amount Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Balance at Fair Value Assets: Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 55,300 $ 55,300 $ — $ — $ 55,300 Restricted Cash 158,302 — 158,302 — 158,302 Accounts Receivable 1,670 — 1,670 — 1,670 Total Assets $ 215,272 $ 55,300 $ 159,972 $ — $ 215,272 Liabilities: Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $ 20,305 $ — $ 20,305 $ — $ 20,305 Payable to Investors 113,507 — 113,507 — 113,507 Notes Issued by Securitization Trust 260,060 — 265,207 — 265,207 Warehouse Lines 205,818 — 205,818 — 205,818 Total Liabilities $ 599,690 $ — $ 604,837 $ — $ 604,837 |
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities | Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Prosper Funding measures the fair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value: Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologies for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands): September 30, 2019 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 247,718 $ 247,718 Servicing Assets — — 15,220 15,220 Total Assets $ — $ — $ 262,938 $ 262,938 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 247,725 $ 247,725 Servicing Liabilities — — 2 2 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,281 3,281 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 251,008 $ 251,008 December 31, 2018 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 263,522 $ 263,522 Servicing Assets — — 15,550 15,550 Total Assets $ — $ — $ 279,072 $ 279,072 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 264,003 $ 264,003 Servicing Liabilities — — 12 12 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,118 3,118 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 267,133 $ 267,133 As Prosper Funding’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper Funding uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. Significant Unobservable Inputs The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper Funding’s level 3 fair value measurements at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: Borrower Loans and Notes: Range Unobservable Input September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 4.7% - 12.2% 4.7% - 13.8% Default rate 2.3% - 17.7% 2.0% - 15.8% Servicing Assets and Liabilities: Range Unobservable Input September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.8% - 18.8% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.5% - 27.8% 15.5% - 25.1% Market servicing rate 0.625 % 0.625 % Loan Trailing Fee Liability: Range Unobservable Input September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.8% - 18.8% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.5% - 27.8% 15.5% - 25.1% The changes in the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, which are level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at July 1, 2019 $ 254,070 $ (253,425) $ — $ 645 Originations 41,460 (41,439) 647,896 647,917 Principal repayments (40,600) 40,993 — 393 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (855) — (647,896) (648,751) Other changes (26) (65) — (91) Change in fair value (6,331) 6,211 — (120) Balance at September 30, 2019 $ 247,718 $ (247,725) $ — $ (7) Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at July 1, 2018 $ 277,361 $ (277,425) $ 31 $ (33) Originations 43,596 (43,797) 542,910 542,709 Principal repayments (42,139) 43,418 (6) 1,273 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (843) — (542,899) (543,742) Other changes 24 (9) — 15 Change in fair value (9,450) 9,225 (25) (250) Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 268,549 $ (268,588) $ 11 $ (28) Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 263,522 $ (264,003) $ — $ (481) Originations 127,522 (128,152) 1,809,133 1,808,503 Principal repayments (123,014) 126,721 — 3,707 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (2,578) — (1,809,133) (1,811,711) Other changes (226) 538 — 312 Change in fair value (17,508) 17,171 — (337) Balance at September 30, 2019 $ 247,718 $ (247,725) $ — $ (7) Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2018 $ 293,005 $ (293,948) $ 49 $ (894) Originations 134,671 (134,490) 1,867,010 1,867,191 Principal repayments (131,086) 134,943 (20) 3,837 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (2,859) — (1,866,999) (1,869,858) Other changes (314) 624 — 310 Change in fair value (24,868) 24,283 (29) (614) Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 268,549 $ (268,588) $ 11 $ (28) The following table presents additional information about level 3 servicing assets recorded at fair value (in thousands): Servicing Assets Fair Value at July 1, 2019 $ 15,461 Additions 3,436 Less: Changes in fair value (3,677) Fair Value at September 30, 2019 $ 15,220 Servicing Assets Fair Value at July 1, 2018 $ 16,162 Additions 3,198 Less: Changes in fair value (3,430) Fair Value at September 30, 2018 $ 15,930 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2019 $ 15,550 Additions 10,232 Less: Changes in fair value (10,562) Fair Value at September 30, 2019 $ 15,220 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2018 $ 14,598 Additions 11,345 Less: Changes in fair value (10,013) Fair Value at September 30, 2018 $ 15,930 Loan Trailing Fee The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates using a discounted cash flow model. The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Loan Trailing Fee Liability Fair Value at January 1, 2019 $ 3,118 Issuances 2,063 Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,744) Change in fair value (156) Fair Value at September 30, 2019 $ 3,281 Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at September 30, 2019 for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes funded are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages): Borrower Loans Notes Fair Value at September 30, 2019 $ 247,718 $ 247,725 Discount rate assumption: 6.90 % * 6.90 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 245,444 $ 245,448 200 basis point increase $ 243,224 $ 243,225 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 250,048 $ 250,059 200 basis point decrease $ 252,435 $ 252,450 Default rate assumption: 13.50 % * 13.50 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 244,463 $ 244,453 200 basis point increase $ 241,304 $ 241,278 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 251,036 $ 251,059 200 basis point decrease $ 254,376 $ 254,417 * Represe nts weighted average assumptions considering all credit grades. The following table presents the estimated impact on Prosper Funding’s estimated fair value of servicing assets, calculated using different market servicing rates and different default rates as of September 30, 2019 (in thousands, except percentages): Servicing Assets Fair Value at September 30, 2019 $ 15,220 Market servicing rate assumptions 0.625 % Resulting fair value from: Market servicing rate increase to 0.65% $ 14,274 Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60% $ 16,167 Weighted average prepayment assumptions 21.49 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 14,557 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 14,952 Weighted average default assumptions 12.70 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate $ 15,033 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate $ 15,412 These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects. |