Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities | Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Prosper measures the fair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. The Company applies this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value: Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologies for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Prosper did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019. Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, Servicing Rights and loan trailing fee liability are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model include default and prepayment rates primarily derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability is valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Refer to Note 12 for further details. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands): June 30, 2020 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 457,487 $ 457,487 Loans Held for Sale — — 216,243 216,243 Servicing Assets — — 10,073 10,073 Total Assets $ — $ — $ 683,803 $ 683,803 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 209,987 $ 209,987 Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value — — 31,571 31,571 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability — — 74,998 74,998 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 2,403 2,403 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 318,959 $ 318,959 December 31, 2019 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 634,019 $ 634,019 Loans Held for Sale — — 142,026 142,026 Servicing Assets — — 12,602 12,602 Total Assets $ — $ — $ 788,647 $ 788,647 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 244,171 $ 244,171 Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust — — 52,168 52,168 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability — — 149,996 149,996 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 2,997 2,997 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 449,332 $ 449,332 As Prosper’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, servicing rights and loan trailing fee liability do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, the Company uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. Significant Unobservable Inputs The following tables present quantitative information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019: Range Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Discount rate 6.4% - 15.9% 4.4% - 12.2% Default rate 2.3% - 19.0% 2.1% - 18.6% Range Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Discount rate 8.8% - 19.9% 4.0% - 15.0% Default rate 3.2% - 17.7% 2.0% - 17.0% Prepayment rate 11.1% - 34.2% 14.5% - 33.0% Range Servicing Assets June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.9% - 19.4% 1.7% - 18.8% Prepayment rate 15.3% - 28.5% 16.5% - 28.1% Market servicing rate (1) (2) 0.625% - 0.818% 0.625 % (1) Servicing assets associated with loans enrolled in a relief program offered by the Company in response to the COVID-19 pandemic as of June 30, 2020 were measured using a market servicing rate assumption of 81.8 basis points. This rate was estimated using a multiplier consistent with observable market rates for other loan types, applied to the base market servicing rate assumption of 62.5 basis points. (2) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 4 basis points and 6 basis points, respectively, for a total market servicing rate range of 66.5 - 85.8 basis points and a total market servicing rate of 68.5 basis points, respectively. Range Loan Trailing Fee Liability June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.9% - 19.4% 1.7% - 18.8% Prepayment rate 15.3% - 28.5% 16.5% - 28.1% At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Notes fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Assets and Liabilities on a Recurring Basis The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held For Sale Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Total Balance at January 1, 2020 $ 634,019 $ 142,026 $ (244,171) $ (52,168) $ 479,706 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 65,664 622,122 (65,043) — 622,743 Principal repayments (179,552) (43,076) 77,107 9,875 (135,646) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (4,254) (491,782) — — (496,036) Other changes (158) 779 (257) 341 705 Change in fair value (58,232) (13,826) 22,377 10,381 (39,300) Balance at June 30, 2020 $ 457,487 $ 216,243 $ (209,987) $ (31,571) $ 432,172 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held for Sale Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Total Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 263,522 $ 183,788 $ (264,003) $ — $ 183,307 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 348,629 1,161,237 (86,713) (51,595) 1,371,558 Transfers in (Transfers out) 147,773 (147,773) — — — Principal repayments (134,031) (26,529) 85,728 4,272 (70,560) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (1,886) (1,053,308) — — (1,055,194) Other changes 91 89 603 (603) 180 Change in fair value (17,299) (2,542) 10,960 3,836 (5,045) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 606,799 $ 114,962 $ (253,425) $ (44,090) $ 424,246 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held For Sale Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Total Balance at April 1, 2020 $ 522,404 $ 153,236 $ (225,491) $ (35,316) $ 414,833 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 24,363 222,572 (24,468) — 222,467 Principal repayments (82,837) (24,516) 36,520 5,042 (65,791) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (1,991) (136,148) — — (138,139) Other changes 584 673 (396) 303 1,164 Change in fair value (5,036) 426 3,848 (1,600) (2,362) Balance at June 30, 2020 $ 457,487 $ 216,243 $ (209,987) $ (31,571) $ 432,172 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held for Sale Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Total Balance at April 1, 2019 $ 448,710 $ 106,640 $ (258,722) $ (19,134) $ 277,494 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 213,370 670,382 (41,774) (30,979) 810,999 Transfers in (Transfers out) 33,457 (33,457) — — — Principal repayments (77,402) (11,790) 41,611 3,139 (44,442) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (912) (615,835) — — (616,747) Other changes (48) 255 2 (436) (227) Change in fair value (10,376) (1,233) 5,458 3,320 (2,831) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 606,799 $ 114,962 $ (253,425) $ (44,090) $ 424,246 The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Servicing Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands): Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2020 $ 12,602 Additions 2,703 Less: Changes in fair value (5,232) Fair Value at June 30, 2020 $ 10,073 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2019 $ 14,687 Additions 6,378 Derecognition (1,049) Less: Changes in fair value (6,629) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 13,387 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2020 $ 11,742 Additions 729 Less: Changes in fair value (2,398) Fair Value at June 30, 2020 $ 10,073 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2019 $ 13,814 Additions 3,636 Derecognition (685) Less: Changes in fair value (3,378) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 13,387 The following tables present additional information about the Level 3 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands): Convertible Preferred Stock Balance as of January 1, 2020 $ 149,996 Change in fair value (74,998) Balance as of June 30, 2020 $ 74,998 Convertible Preferred Stock Balance as of January 1, 2019 $ 143,679 Issuance of Stock Warrants 17,553 Change in fair value 5,327 Balance as of June 30, 2019 $ 166,559 Convertible Preferred Stock Balance as of April 1, 2020 $ 94,547 Change in fair value (19,549) Balance as of June 30, 2020 $ 74,998 Convertible Preferred Stock Balance as of April 1, 2019 $ 163,483 Issuance of Stock Warrants 7,805 Change in fair value (4,729) Balance as of June 30, 2019 $ 166,559 Loan Trailing Fee The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and default rates using a discounted cash flow model. The assumptions used are the same as those used for the valuation of Servicing Assets, as described below. The following tables present additional information about the Level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands): Loan Trailing Fee Liability Balance at January 1, 2020 $ 2,997 Issuances 625 Cash Payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,271) Change in Fair Value 52 Balance at June 30, 2020 $ 2,403 Loan Trailing Fee Liability Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 3,118 Issuances 1,297 Cash Payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,298) Change in Fair Value 132 Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 3,249 Loan Trailing Fee Liability Balance at April 1, 2020 $ 2,646 Issuances 240 Cash Payment of Loan Trailing Fee (596) Change in Fair Value 113 Balance at June 30, 2020 $ 2,403 Loan Trailing Fee Liability Balance at April 1, 2019 $ 3,084 Issuances 731 Cash Payment of Loan Trailing Fee (640) Change in Fair Value 74 Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 3,249 Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Input Sensitivity Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages). Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Fair value, using the following assumptions: $ 673,730 $ 776,045 Weighted-average discount rate 11.59 % 7.00 % Weighted-average default rate 13.15 % 12.63 % Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point increase in discount rate $ 667,986 $ 768,924 200 basis point increase in discount rate $ 662,372 $ 761,971 Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 679,607 $ 783,344 200 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 685,623 $ 790,823 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent increase in default rate $ 666,236 $ 765,894 20 percent increase in default rate $ 658,771 $ 756,007 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent decrease in default rate $ 681,254 $ 786,541 20 percent decrease in default rate $ 688,814 $ 797,065 Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for Notes are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages). Notes June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Fair value, using the following assumptions: $ 209,987 $ 244,171 Weighted-average discount rate 11.23 % 6.43 % Weighted-average default rate 13.60 % 13.68 % Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point increase in discount rate $ 208,194 $ 241,927 200 basis point increase in discount rate $ 206,441 $ 239,737 Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 211,821 $ 246,471 200 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 213,698 $ 248,828 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent increase in default rate $ 207,637 $ 240,958 20 percent increase in default rate $ 205,297 $ 237,831 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent decrease in default rate $ 212,345 $ 247,489 20 percent decrease in default rate $ 214,715 $ 250,817 Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages). Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Fair value, using the following assumptions: $ 31,571 $ 52,168 Weighted-average discount rate 14.55 % 9.59 % Weighted-average default rate 13.86 % 10.12 % Weighted-average prepayment rate 22.40 % 21.41 % Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point increase in discount rate $ 31,313 $ 51,813 200 basis point increase in discount rate $ 31,060 $ 51,466 Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 31,836 $ 52,533 200 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 32,108 $ 52,909 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent increase in default rate $ 29,670 $ 48,986 20 percent increase in default rate $ 27,777 $ 45,926 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent decrease in default rate $ 33,482 $ 55,369 20 percent decrease in default rate $ 35,405 $ 58,613 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent increase in prepayment rate $ 31,514 $ 52,085 20 percent increase in prepayment rate $ 31,451 $ 52,008 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent decrease in prepayment rate $ 31,631 $ 52,253 20 percent decrease in prepayment rate $ 31,693 $ 52,340 Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for Servicing Assets is presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages). Servicing Assets June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Fair value, using the following assumptions $ 10,073 $ 12,602 Weighted-average market servicing rate 0.632 % 0.625 % Weighted-average prepayment rate 20.67 % 20.99 % Weighted-average default rate 13.47 % 12.67 % Fair value resulting from: Market servicing rate increase of 0.025% $ 9,467 $ 11,825 Market servicing rate decrease of 0.025% $ 10,680 $ 13,387 Fair value resulting from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 9,872 $ 12,348 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 10,276 $ 12,868 Fair value resulting from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate $ 9,925 $ 12,377 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate $ 10,222 $ 12,840 These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects. Assets and Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for assets, and liabilities not recorded at fair value (in thousands): June 30, 2020 Carrying Amount Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Balance at Fair Value Assets: Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 46,575 $ 46,575 $ — $ — $ 46,575 Restricted Cash 143,318 — 143,318 — 143,318 Accounts Receivable 1,047 — 1,047 — 1,047 Total Assets $ 190,940 $ 46,575 $ 144,365 $ — $ 190,940 Liabilities: Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $ 12,044 $ — $ 12,044 $ — $ 12,044 Payable to Investors 102,405 — 102,405 — 102,405 Notes Issued by Securitization Trust 235,353 — 228,924 — 228,924 Warehouse Lines 198,857 — 198,212 — 198,212 Total Liabilities $ 548,659 $ — $ 541,585 $ — $ 541,585 |
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities | Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Prosper Funding has elected to record certain financial instruments at fair value on the balance sheet. Prosper Funding classifies Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes as financial instruments and assesses their fair value each on a quarterly basis for financial statement presentation purposes. Gains and losses on these financial instruments are shown separately on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Notes fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. As demonstrated in the table below, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and because the principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value: Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologies for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Prosper Funding did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019. Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value The fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default and prepayment rates derived primarily from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands): June 30, 2020 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 211,775 $ 211,775 Servicing Assets — — 12,063 12,063 Total Assets $ — $ — $ 223,838 $ 223,838 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 209,986 $ 209,986 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 2,403 2,403 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 212,389 $ 212,389 December 31, 2019 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 245,137 $ 245,137 Servicing Assets — — 14,888 14,888 Total Assets $ — $ — $ 260,025 $ 260,025 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 244,171 $ 244,171 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 2,997 2,997 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 247,168 $ 247,168 As Prosper Funding’s Borrower Loans, Notes, Servicing Assets and loan trailing fee liability do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper Funding uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. Significant Unobservable Inputs The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper Funding’s Level 3 fair value measurements at the dates presented: Range Borrower Loans and Notes June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Discount rate 8.2% - 15.9% 4.4% - 12.1% Default rate 2.7% - 17.7% 2.4% - 17.7% Range Servicing Assets June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.9% - 19.4% 1.7% - 18.8% Prepayment rate 15.3% - 28.5% 16.5% - 28.1% Market servicing rate (1) (2) 0.625% - 0.818% 0.625 % (1) Servicing assets associated with loans enrolled in a relief program offered by the Company in response to the COVID-19 pandemic as of June 30, 2020 were measured using a market servicing rate assumption of 81.8 basis points. This rate was estimated using a multiplier consistent with observable market rates for other loan types, applied to the base market servicing rate assumption of 62.5 basis points. (2) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 4 basis points and 6 basis points, respectively, for a total market servicing rate range of 66.5 - 85.8 basis points and a total market servicing rate of 68.5 basis points, respectively. Range Loan Trailing Fee Liability June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.9% - 19.4% 1.7% - 18.8% Prepayment rate 15.3% - 28.5% 16.5% - 28.1% Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Assets and Liabilities on a Recurring Basis The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis for three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held for Sale Notes Total Balance at January 1, 2020 $ 245,137 $ — $ (244,171) $ 966 Originations 65,664 622,122 (65,043) 622,743 Principal repayments (75,596) — 77,108 1,512 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (1,564) (622,122) — (623,686) Other changes 253 — (257) (4) Change in fair value (22,119) — 22,377 258 Balance at June 30, 2020 $ 211,775 $ — $ (209,986) $ 1,789 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held for Sale Notes Total Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 263,522 $ — $ (264,003) $ (481) Originations 86,062 1,161,237 (86,713) 1,160,586 Principal repayments (82,414) — 85,728 3,314 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (1,723) (1,161,237) — (1,162,960) Other changes (200) — 603 403 Change in fair value (11,177) — 10,960 (217) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 254,070 $ — $ (253,425) $ 645 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held for Sale Notes Total Balance at April 1, 2020 $ 227,659 $ — $ (225,491) $ 2,168 Originations 24,363 222,572 (24,468) 222,467 Principal repayments (36,256) — 36,520 264 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (682) (222,572) — (223,254) Other changes 344 — (395) (51) Change in fair value (3,653) — 3,848 195 Balance at June 30, 2020 $ 211,775 $ — $ (209,986) $ 1,789 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Assets Liabilities Borrower Loans Loans Held for Sale Notes Total Balance at April 1, 2019 $ 259,899 $ — $ (258,722) $ 1,177 Originations 41,839 670,382 (41,774) 670,447 Principal repayments (41,215) — 41,611 396 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (749) (670,382) — (671,131) Other changes (115) — 2 (113) Change in fair value (5,589) — 5,458 (131) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 254,070 $ — $ (253,425) $ 645 The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Servicing Assets recorded at fair value (in thousands): Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2020 $ 14,888 Additions 3,402 Less: Changes in fair value (6,227) Fair Value at June 30, 2020 $ 12,063 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2019 $ 15,550 Additions 6,796 Less: Changes in fair value (6,885) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 15,461 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2020 $ 13,690 Additions 1,206 Less: Changes in fair value (2,833) Fair Value at June 30, 2020 $ 12,063 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2019 $ 15,174 Additions 3,830 Less: Changes in fair value (3,543) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 15,461 Loan Trailing Fee Liability The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee Liability represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and default rates using a discounted cash flow model. The assumptions used are the same as those used for the valuation of Servicing Assets, as described below. The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Loan Trailing Fee Liability Fair Value at January 1, 2020 $ 2,997 Issuances 625 Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,271) Change in fair value 52 Fair Value at June 30, 2020 $ 2,403 Loan Trailing Fee Liability Fair Value at January 1, 2019 $ 3,118 Issuances 1,297 Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,298) Change in fair value 132 Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 3,249 Loan Trailing Fee Liability Fair Value at April 1, 2020 $ 2,646 Issuances 240 Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee (596) Change in fair value 113 Fair Value at June 30, 2020 $ 2,403 Loan Trailing Fee Liability Fair Value at April 1, 2019 $ 3,084 Issuances 731 Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee (640) Change in fair value 74 Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 3,249 Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Borrower Loans. The sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for Borrower Loans are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages). Borrower Loans June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Fair value, using the following assumptions: $ 211,775 $ 245,137 Weighted-average discount rate 11.23 % 6.43 % Weighted-average default rate 13.60 % 13.68 % Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point increase in discount rate $ 209,970 $ 242,888 200 basis point increase in discount rate 208,205 240,691 Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 213,623 $ 247,442 200 basis point decrease in discount rate 215,514 249,805 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent increase in default rate $ 209,420 $ 241,930 20 percent increase in default rate 207,073 238,807 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent decrease in default rate $ 214,140 $ 248,453 20 percent decrease in default rate 216,517 251,777 Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Notes. The sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages). Notes June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Fair value, using the following assumptions: $ 209,986 $ 244,171 Weighted-average discount rate 11.23 % 6.43 % Weighted-average default rate 13.60 % 13.68 % Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point increase in discount rate $ 208,194 $ 241,927 200 basis point increase in discount rate 206,441 239,737 Fair value resulting from: 100 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 211,821 $ 246,471 200 basis point decrease in discount rate 213,698 248,828 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent increase in default rate $ 207,637 $ 240,958 20 percent increase in default rate 205,297 237,831 Fair value resulting from: 10 percent decrease in default rate $ 212,345 $ 247,489 20 percent decrease in default rate 214,715 250,817 Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Servicing Assets. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for Servicing Assets are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages). Servicing Assets June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Fair value, using the following assumptions: $ 12,063 $ 14,888 Weighted-average market servicing rate 0.632 % 0.625 % Weighted-average prepayment rate 20.67 % 20.99 % Weighted-average default rate 13.47 % 12.67 % Fair value resulting from: Market servicing rate increase of 0.025% $ 11,336 $ 13,966 Market servicing rate decrease of 0.025% 12,789 15,811 Fair value resulting from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 11,822 $ 14,583 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate 12,306 15,197 Fair value resulting from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate $ 11,885 $ 14,618 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate 12,241 15,165 These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects. |