Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Presentation | | |
|
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year end is March 31. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Use of Estimates | | |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the collectability of accounts receivable, valuation of intangible assets, fair value of stock-based compensation, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected. |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Financial Statements | | |
|
These financial statements have been prepared in the opinion of management to reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | | |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no cash equivalents. |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
e) | Notes Receivable | |
|
The Company evaluates the collectability of notes receivable based on the age of receivable balances and debtor credit-worthiness. If the Company determines that financial conditions of its debtors have deteriorated, an allowance for doubtful accounts may be made or the notes receivables written off if all collection attempts have failed. |
|
The Company recognizes interest income on notes receivable using the effective interest method. If the Company determines that the recoverability of any of its notes receivable is not probable, it will place the notes on nonaccrual status and will cease recording interest income. Should the Company later determine that the notes receivable balance is recoverable, it will resume the accrual of interest |
Prepaid Expenses [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Prepaid Expenses | | |
|
The Company pays for some property related services in advance and recognizes these expenses as prepaid at the balance sheet date. Prepaid expenses are carried at fair value which is deemed to be the gross value of the pre-payment due to the short-term maturity of these payments. The Company does have certain prepaid expenses that extend beyond one-year and those are classified as non-current assets. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Revenue Recognition | | |
|
The Company recognizes revenue from licensing and professional fees to non-related parties. During the period ended June 30, 2014, the Company derived all of its revenue from three customers acquired under the asset purchase from Alligato. Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is reasonably assured. |
Investment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Investments | | |
|
The Company classifies its equity investments in third parties as held for investment and recognizes the fair market value of these assets. As these investments are in public companies, the Company has used the market value at June 30, 2014 as a representation of fair market value. |
Intangible Assets, Finite-Lived, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Intangible Assets | | |
|
Intangible assets include all costs incurred to acquire internet network and channels. Intangible assets are recorded at cost and amortized over its useful life of three years using the straight-line method. No amortization has been taken on intangible assets, as they have not yet been put into use. |
|
The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets and the related estimated remaining lives at each balance sheet date. The Company records an impairment or change in useful life whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Stock-based Compensation | | |
|
The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share | | |
|
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has 1,199,914 (2013 – 272,500) potentially dilutive shares. |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Comprehensive Loss | | |
|
ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As of June 30, 2014 the Company has an Other Comprehensive Loss of $163,406 (2013 – nil), which is due to the revaluation to Fair Market Value of the Company’s investment in Telupay International PLC. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value Measurement | | |
|
Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value: |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. |
|
Level 3 |
|
Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
|
The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, amounts receivable, investments, interest receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | | |
|
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to: |
|
|
| • | Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and |
|
| • | Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense. |
|
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
|
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |