Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures | Note 8 Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures Risk Management Policy The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risks related to its business operations. The company’s hedging policy attempts to manage these risks to an acceptable level based on the company’s judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and costs. The company uses derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency exchange rates. The company is also exposed to the risk that its earnings and cash flows could be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. The company periodically enters into interest rate swaps, based on judgment, to manage interest costs in which the company agrees to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and floating interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional amount. Derivative instruments are not used for trading purposes or to manage exposure to changes in interest rates for investment securities, and none of the company’s outstanding derivative instruments contain credit risk related contingent features; collateral is generally not required. Financial Instruments Various AbbVie foreign subsidiaries enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage exposures to changes in foreign exchange rates for anticipated intercompany transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the local entity. These contracts, with notional amounts totaling $3.2 billion and $1.5 billion at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, were designated as cash flow hedges and were recorded at fair value. The duration of these forward exchange contracts were generally less than eighteen months. Accumulated gains and losses as of March 31, 2016 will be included in cost of products sold at the time the products are sold, generally not exceeding six months from the date of settlement. The company also enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage its exposure to foreign currency denominated trade payables and receivables and intercompany loans. These contracts were not designated as hedges and were recorded at fair value. Resulting gains or losses were reflected in net foreign exchange loss in the consolidated statements of earnings and were generally offset by losses or gains on the foreign currency exposure being managed. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, AbbVie held notional amounts of $7.1 billion and $6.8 billion, respectively, of such foreign currency forward exchange contracts. AbbVie is a party to interest rate hedge contracts, designated as fair value hedges, totaling $11.0 billion at both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The effect of the hedge is to change a fixed-rate interest obligation to a floating rate for that portion of the debt. AbbVie recorded the contracts at fair value and adjusted the carrying amount of the fixed-rate debt by an offsetting amount. The following table summarizes the amounts and location of AbbVie’s derivative instruments as of March 31, 2016: Fair value – Derivatives in asset position Fair value – Derivatives in liability position (in millions) Balance sheet caption Amount Balance sheet caption Amount Foreign currency forward exchange contracts — Hedging instruments Prepaid expenses and other $ 6 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ Hedging instruments Other long-term assets Other long-term liabilities Others not designated as hedges Prepaid expenses and other Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges Other long-term assets Other long-term liabilities — Total derivatives $ $ The following table summarizes the amounts and location of AbbVie’s derivative instruments as of December 31, 2015: Fair value – Derivatives in asset position Fair value – Derivatives in liability position (in millions) Balance sheet caption Amount Balance sheet caption Amount Foreign currency forward exchange contracts — Hedging instruments Prepaid expenses and other $ Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ — Others not designated as hedges Prepaid expenses and other Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges Other long-term assets Other long-term liabilities Total derivatives $ $ While certain derivatives are subject to netting arrangements with the company’s counterparties, the company does not offset derivative assets and liabilities within the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unrealized gains/(losses) for the effective portions of the derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss) were ($39) million and $87 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness was not significant for the three months ended March 31, 2016 or 2015. The following table summarizes the location in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and the amount of gain/(loss) recognized into net earnings for derivative instruments, including the effective portions of the gain/(loss) reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) into net earnings: Three months ended March 31, (in millions) (brackets denote losses) Income statement caption 2016 2015 Foreign currency forward exchange contracts — Designated as cash flow hedges Cost of products sold $ $ Not designated as hedges Net foreign exchange loss ) ) Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges Interest expense, net Total $ $ ) The gain/(loss) related to fair value hedges is recognized in interest expense, net and directly offsets the (loss)/gain on the underlying hedged item, the fixed-rate debt, resulting in no net impact to interest expense, net for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Fair Value Measures The fair value hierarchy under the accounting standard for fair value measurements consists of the following three levels: · Level 1 – Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the company has the ability to access; · Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market; and · Level 3 – Valuations using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market and include the use of judgment by the company’s management about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain assets and liabilities that were carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2016: Basis of fair value measurement (in millions) Balance at March 31, 2016 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Assets Cash and equivalents $ $ $ $— Time deposits — — Debt securities — — Equity securities — — Interest rate hedges — — Foreign currency contracts — — Total assets $ $ $ $— Liabilities Foreign currency contracts $ $ — $ $— Total liabilities $ $ — $ $— The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain assets and liabilities that were carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015: Basis of fair value measurement (in millions) Balance at December 31, 2015 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Assets Cash and equivalents $ $ $ $— Time deposits — — Equity securities — — Interest rate hedges — — Foreign currency contracts — — Total assets $ $ $ $— Liabilities Interest rate hedges $ $ — $ $— Foreign currency contracts — — Total liabilities $ $ — $ $— The fair values for time deposits included in cash and equivalents and short-term investments were determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis reflecting quoted market rates for the same or similar instruments. The fair values of time deposits approximate their amortized cost due to the short maturities of these instruments. The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities were generally based on prices obtained from commercial pricing services. Available-for-sale equity securities consists of investments for which the fair values were determined by using the published market price per unit multiplied by the number of units held, without consideration of transaction costs. The derivatives entered into by the company were valued using publicized spot curves for interest rate hedges and publicized forward curves for foreign currency contracts. There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between the fair value measurement levels. In addition to the financial instruments that the company is required to recognize at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, the company has certain financial instruments that were recognized at historical cost or some basis other than fair value. The carrying values and fair values of certain financial instruments as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are shown in the table below: Book values Approximate fair values (in millions) March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Assets Investments $ $ $ $ Liabilities Short-term borrowings Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations Long-term debt and lease obligations, excluding fair value hedges The following table summarizes the bases used to measure the approximate fair values of the financial instruments as of March 31, 2016: Basis of fair value measurement (in millions) Fair Value at March 31, 2016 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Assets Investments $ 35 $ — $ — $ Total assets $ 35 $ — $ — $ Liabilities Short-term borrowings $ 400 $ — $ $ — Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations — — Long-term debt and lease obligations, excluding fair value hedges — Total liabilities $ $ $ $ — The following table summarizes the bases used to measure the approximate fair values of the financial instruments as of December 31, 2015: Basis of fair value measurement (in millions) Fair Value at December 31, 2015 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Assets Investments $ 37 $ — $ — $ Total assets $ 37 $ — $ — $ Liabilities Short-term borrowings $ 406 $ — $ $ — Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations — — Long-term debt and lease obligations, excluding fair value hedges — Total liabilities $ $ $ $ — Investments consist of cost method investments. To determine the fair values of other cost method investments, the company takes into consideration recent transactions, as well as the financial information of the investee, which represents a Level 3 basis of fair value measurement. The fair values of short-term and current borrowings approximate the carrying values due to the short maturities of these instruments. The fair values of long-term debt, excluding fair value hedges and the term loans, were determined by using the published market price for the debt instruments, without consideration of transaction costs, which represents a Level 1 basis of fair value measurement. The fair values of the term loans were determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis using quoted market rates, which represents a Level 2 basis of fair value measurement. The counterparties to financial instruments consist of select major international financial institutions. Available-for-sale Securities Substantially all of the company’s investments in debt and equity securities were classified as available-for-sale. As of March 31, 2016, approximately $1.2 billion of the company’s debt securities were classified as short-term. The company’s long-term debt securities mature within five years. There were no material debt securities outstanding as of December 31, 2015. Estimated fair values of available-for-sale securities were generally based on prices obtained from commercial pricing services. The following table is a summary of available-for-sale securities by type as of March 31, 2016: Amortized Gross unrealized Fair (in millions) Cost Gains Losses Value U.S. government securities $ $ — $— $ Corporate debt securities — Other debt securities — — Equity securities ) Total $ $ $ ) $ AbbVie periodically assesses its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment losses. This evaluation is based on a number of factors, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis and adverse conditions related specifically to the security including any changes to the credit rating of the security, and the intent to sell, or whether AbbVie will more likely than not be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. AbbVie’s assessment of whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired could change in the future due to new developments or changes in assumptions related to any particular security. Based on a review of these securities, AbbVie had no other-than-temporary impairments on these securities as of March 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments were computed using the first-in, first-out method adjusted for any other-than-temporary declines in fair value that were recorded in earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, realized gains and losses were immaterial. Concentrations of Risk The functional currency of the company’s Venezuela operations is the U.S. dollar due to the hyperinflationary status of the Venezuelan economy. At December 31, 2015, there were three legal exchange mechanisms administered by the Venezuelan government. These were the official rate of 6.3, the SICAD rate of approximately 13.5, and the SIMADI rate of approximately 200. Effective March 10, 2016, the Venezuelan government devalued the official rate of 6.3 to 10 VEF per U.S. dollar, eliminated the SICAD rate, and replaced SIMADI with a new exchange mechanism called DICOM. As of March 31, 2016, the DICOM rate was approximately 270 VEF per U.S. dollar. During the first quarter of 2016, in consideration of declining economic conditions in Venezuela and a decline in transactions settled at the official rate, AbbVie determined that its net monetary assets denominated in the Venezuelan bolivar were no longer expected to be settled at the official rate of 10 VEF per U.S. dollar, but rather at the DICOM rate of approximately 270 VEF per U.S. dollar. Therefore, during the first quarter of 2016, AbbVie recorded a charge of $298 million to net foreign exchange loss to revalue its bolivar-denominated net monetary assets using the DICOM rate of approximately 270 VEF per U.S. dollar. As of March 31, 2016, after the revaluation, AbbVie’s net monetary assets in Venezuela were less than $10 million. The company cannot predict whether there will be further devaluations of the Venezuelan currency or whether use of the DICOM rate will continue to be supported by evolving facts and circumstances. The company also continues to do business with foreign governments in certain other oil-exporting countries, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, which have experienced a deterioration in economic conditions. Due to the decline in the price of oil, liquidity issues in certain countries may result in delays in the collection of receivables. Three U.S. wholesalers accounted for 41% and 51% of total net accounts receivable as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and substantially all of AbbVie’s net revenues in the United States are to these three wholesalers. In addition, net governmental receivables outstanding in Greece, Portugal, Italy, and Spain totaled $567 million at March 31, 2016 and $525 million at December 31, 2015. HUMIRA ® (adalimumab) is AbbVie’s single largest product and accounted for approximately 60% and 62% of AbbVie’s total net revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Debt and Credit Facilities In March 2015, AbbVie entered into the bridge loan in support of the then planned acquisition of Pharmacyclics. No amounts were drawn under the bridge loan, which was terminated as a result of the company’s May 2015 issuance of the senior notes. Interest expense, net in the three months ended March 2015 included $59 million of costs related to the bridge loan. Short-term borrowings include commercial paper borrowings of $400 million at both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding commercial paper borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. |