On October 22, 2020, Front Yard Residential Corporation (the “Company”) filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with the proposed acquisition of Front Yard Residential Corporation (the “Company” or “Front Yard”) by Pretium Midway Holdco, LP (“Parent”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 19, 2020 (the “Original Agreement”), as amended by the First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 20, 2020 (the “Amendment” and, together with the Original Agreement, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Parent and Midway AcquisitionCo REIT (“Merger Sub”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. On November 23, 2020, the Company filed with the SEC its preliminary proxy statement on Schedule 14A and on December 8, 2020, the Company filed with the SEC its definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A relating to the special meeting of stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held on January 6, 2021 (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) to, among other things, vote on a proposal to approve the merger of the Company with and into Merger Sub (the “Merger”) with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent.
Since the initial filing of the preliminary proxy statement on Schedule 14A, five actions (collectively, the “Front Yard Stockholder Actions”) have been filed in federal courts in Delaware, New York and Georgia by purported Front Yard stockholders in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement: Wang v. Front Yard Residential Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:99-mc-09999 (D. Del. Nov. 24, 2020) (the “Wang Action”); Braunstein v. Front Yard Residential Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-10110 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2020); Long v. Front Yard Residential Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01668-UNA (D. Del. Dec. 8, 2020) (the “Long Action”); Klein v. Whitfield, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-10485 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2020); and Kearny v. Front Yard Residential Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:20-mi-99999-UNA (N.D. Ga. Dec. 24, 2020). Each of the Front Yard Stockholder Actions names Front Yard and its directors as defendants, and the Wang Action and the Long Action name Parent as an additional defendant. Each of the Front Yard Stockholder Actions alleges, among other things, that the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A is false and misleading and/or omits material information concerning the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The plaintiffs in the Front Yard Stockholder Actions, among other things, seek to enjoin the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses.
SUPPLEMENT TO DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT
This supplemental information should be read in conjunction with the Definitive Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. Page references in the below disclosures are to pages in the Definitive Proxy Statement, and defined terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Definitive Proxy Statement. To the extent the following information differs from or conflicts with the information contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement, the information set forth below shall be deemed to supersede the respective information in the Definitive Proxy Statement. The Company denies the allegations in the complaints related to the Front Yard Stockholder Actions and denies any alleged violations of law or any legal or equitable duty. Without admitting in any way that the disclosures below are material or otherwise required by law, the Company makes the following amended and supplemental disclosures solely for the purpose of mooting the allegations in the complaints related to the Front Yard Stockholder Actions.
2